Next Article in Journal
Corrosion Behavior of Ni/NiCr/NiCrAlSi Composite Coating on Copper for Application as a Heat Exchanger in Sea Water
Previous Article in Journal
Domain Growth in Polycrystalline Graphene
Previous Article in Special Issue
Development of Antibacterial Cotton Textiles by Deposition of Fe2O3 Nanoparticles Using Low-Temperature Plasma Sputtering
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 13
Issue 24
10.3390/nano13243128
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synthesis, Characterization and Potential Antimicrobial Activity of Selenium Nanoparticles Stabilized with Cetyltrimethylammonium Chloride

by
Anastasiya Blinova
1,
Andrey Blinov
1,
Alexander Kravtsov
1,
Andrey Nagdalian
2,*,
Zafar Rekhman
1,
Alexey Gvozdenko
1,
Maksim Kolodkin
1,
Dionis Filippov
1,
Alina Askerova
2,
Alexey Golik
1,
Alexander Serov
3,
Mohammad Ali Shariati
4,
Naiyf S. Alharbi
5,
Shine Kadaikunnan
5 and
Muthu Thiruvengadam
6,*
1
Physical and Technical Faculty, North-Caucasus Federal University, 355017 Stavropol, Russia
2
Laboratory of Food and Industrial Biotechnology, North-Caucasus Federal University, 355017 Stavropol, Russia
3
Chemical and Pharmaceutical Faculty, North-Caucasus Federal University, 355017 Stavropol, Russia
4
Scientific Department, Semey Branch of the Kazakh Research Institute of Processing and Food Industry, Gagarin Avenue 238G, Almaty 050060, Kazakhstan
5
Department of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, P. O. Box 2455, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
6
Department of Applied Bioscience, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Republic of Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2023, 13(24), 3128; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13243128
Submission received: 29 August 2023 / Revised: 2 December 2023 / Accepted: 8 December 2023 / Published: 13 December 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antimicrobial Activity of Metallic and Metal Oxide Nanoparticles)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Selenium nanoparticles (Se NPs) have a number of unique properties that determine the use of the resulting nanomaterials in various fields. The focus of this paper is the stabilization of Se NPs with cetyltrimethylammonium chloride (CTAC). Se NPs were obtained by chemical reduction in an aqueous medium. The influence of the concentration of precursors and synthesis conditions on the size of Se NPs and the process of micelle formation was established. Transmission electron microscopy was used to study the morphology of Se NPs. The influence of the pH of the medium and the concentration of ions in the sol on the stability of Se micelles was studied. According to the results of this study, the concentration of positively charged ions has a greater effect on the particle size in the positive Se NPs sol than in the negative Se NPs sol. The potential antibacterial and fungicidal properties of the samples were studied on Escherichia coli, Micrococcus luteus and Mucor. Concentrations of Se NPs stabilized with CTAC with potential bactericidal and fungicidal effects were discovered. Considering the revealed potential antimicrobial activity, the synthesized Se NPs-CTAC molecular complex can be further studied and applied in the development of veterinary drugs, pharmaceuticals, and cosmetics.

1. Introduction

A crucial component for both human and animal health is selenium (Se). It is a component of Se-cysteine, an amino acid needed to create a number of selenium-proteins in the human body [1]. Se deficiency in both humans and animals leads to serious problems such as hypothyroidism, Keshan and Kashin–Beck diseases [2,3,4,5]. Eliminating Se deficit is possible and realistic with biofortification. Profiting from nanotechnology, selenium nanoparticles (Se NPs) have recently been proved to show stronger biological activity and lower toxicity than the traditional selenium compounds [6,7,8]. Further, Se NPs are able to inhibit the growth of microorganisms [9,10].
The particle form, size, and surface chemistry have been recognized as crucial parameters determining the interaction of nanomaterials with biological entities [11]. However, Se NPs, despite their advantages and unique properties, tend to aggregate into dark clusters due to their high surface energy [12]. Such aggregates are thermodynamically stable but biologically inert [13]. Consequently, disperse state is one of the critical parameters that determine biologically activity of Se NPs and their industrial application [14]. In this regard, it is necessary to take into account possible ways of obtaining Se NPs, as well as to study the issue of their stability, physicochemical and dispersion properties.
In practice, both biological and chemical reductions can be used to conditionally classify Se NPs synthesis techniques [15,16]. Through the use of biological agents such as bacteria or plant extracts, various inorganic and chemical compounds of Se can be reduced to convenient and non-toxic Se NPs. For example, extracts of Allium cepa, Malpighia emarginata and Gymnanthemum amygdalinum were used to generate Se NPs [17,18,19]. The obtained nanoparticles were measured between 245 and 321 nm. In addition, other researchers generated Se NPs using starch encapsulation [20], bacteria (saltophilic bacteria) [21] and orange peel waste [22]. Chemical reduction uses compounds that have a reducing property to Se. Particle size is controlled using surfactants or growth-preventing reagents such as polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and folic acid. Polyvinylpyrrolidone [23], polyvinyl alcohol [24], protein molecules [25] and polysaccharides [26] can be used as stabilizers for Se NPs. Among them, polysaccharides are considered as an appropriate option for fabricating Se NPs when energy efficiency and eco-friendliness are needed [26,27]. However, Se NPs stabilized with polysaccharides have still unacceptable instability, due to enlargement of size and decline of zeta potential during preservation in aqueous environment [27,28].
Nowadays, surfactants have been widely used to coat nanoparticles for biomedical use [29,30]. Quaternary ammonium compounds are typical surfactants with a hydrophilic ammonium head group and one or two hydrophobic tail groups. Due to their amphoteric nature, they have antiseptic, anesthetic and antibacterial properties [31]. Quaternary ammonium compounds are used in the manufacture of various cosmetic products [32], to form micelles in drug delivery systems (especially in tumor therapy) and as a stabilizer for nanoparticle synthesis [33]. The environmental safety and low toxicity of these substances determine their use in various areas [34]. In contrast, Se NPs can be used in the veterinary, pharmaceutical and cosmetic industries due to their low toxicity, higher absorption capacity, and frequent elimination from the body [34,35,36,37]. Currently, Se NPs are widely applied in medical diagnosis and drug delivery [38,39,40]. The synthesis and study of Se NPs is a topical issue regarding their useful functions and properties [35,36]. Considering the high activity and low stability of Se NPs, the use of ionic and non-ionic surfactants as stabilizers can provide their practical application [37,38].
Nanomaterials have enzymatic catalytic properties and accelerate biocatalytic reactions. Unlike natural enzymes, nanosystems are highly stable and quite easy to obtain. Thus, nanomaterials are widely used in fields such as bacterial theranostics and as antibacterial agents [41,42]. Filipović et al. [11] reported that the use of Se NPs as antimicrobial agents is a promising strategy, especially when dealing with chronic and nosocomial infections. Generally, various mechanisms of nanoparticles antimicrobial activity were recognized to date: ROS generation, interaction with cell barrier (cell wall disruption and alteration in permeability), inhibition in the synthesis of proteins and DNA, expression of metabolic genes, etc. [43,44,45]. The main advantage of Se NPs as antimicrobial agents could be their ability to simultaneously act through these multiple mechanisms, which can solve the problem of the development of multidrug-resistant bacterial strains tolerant to commercial antibiotics [46].
Considering the above issues, the aim of this work was to synthesize and characterize Se NPs stabilized with cetyltrimethylammonium chloride (CTAC) and to study their potential antimicrobial activity towards Escherichia coli, Micrococcus luteus and Mucor.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Synthesis of Se NPs-CTAC

Se NPs were synthesized by chemical reduction in aqueous media in the presence of a stabilizer [47]. CTAC (analytical grade, VitaReaktiv, Dzerzhinsk, Russia) was used as the stabilizer. Selenious acid (analytical grade, INTERKHIM, Moscow, Russia) was used as a Se-containing precursor. Ascorbic acid (analytical grade, LenReaktiv, Saint Petersburg, Russia) was used as the reducing agent.
The synthesis of Se NPs was carried out as follows. Solutions were prepared with different ratios (from 0.5 to 4) of the amount of quaternary ammonium compound and the amount of selenious acid. For this purpose, from 0.68 g to 5.24 g CTAC was dissolved in 100 mL of 0.036 M selenious acid solution, depending on the ratio specified. 0.088 M ascorbic acid solution was prepared by dissolving 773.8 mg of acid in 50 mL of distilled water. At the third stage, a solution of ascorbic acid was added dropwise to solutions of selenious acid and CTAC, stirring vigorously. The obtained sample was stirred for 5–10 min. The schematic diagram of the synthesis of Se NPs-CTAC is shown in Figure 1.

2.2. Optimization of the Synthesis of Se NPs-CTAC

To optimize the experimental settings, a multivariate experiment with three input parameters and three levels of variation was carried out. The average hydrodynamic particle radius (rav) and ζ-potential energy were the output parameters. The degree of fluctuation of the parameters was assessed using early experiments as a result of this. Table 1 displays information about the concentrations of compounds and a test matrix.
The experimental findings were mathematically processed using the Neural Statistica 12 Network software program (Statsoft, Tulsa, OK, USA) [48].

2.3. Characterization of Se NPs-CTAC

The microstructure of Se NPs-CTAC were examined using a Carl Zeiss Libra 120M transmission electron magnifying lens (Carl Zeiss Microscopy, Oberkochen, Germany). Se NPs-CTAC were coupled by ultrasonic scattering of a 1:1 arrangement of test and water onto copper lattices with a carbon substrate. During transmission electron microscopy (TEM), the Libra 120M FEM thermionic weapon (Carl Zeiss Microscopy, Oberkochen, Germany) was used with a quickening voltage of 120 kV [49,50].
The amount of Se NPs was measured using Photocor-Complex gadget (Antek-97, Moscow, Russia) and dynamic light scattering (DLS) with the DynaLS software 2.0 (Photocor, Moscow, Russia). Tests of Se NPs were attenuated four times with refined water for estimation [49]. The study of the ζ-potential was carried out by electroacoustic spectroscopy using a DT-1202 setup (Dispersion Technology Inc., Lakewood, NJ, USA).
The spectral characteristics of Se NPs samples were studied by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) using FSM-1201 spectrometer (Infraspec, Saint Petersburg, Russia) and UV–visible spectroscopy using SF-56 spectrometer (OKB “Spectrum”, Saint Petersburg, Russia).

2.4. The Stability of Se NPs-CTAC

The pH and ionic strength of the solution were varied to assess the stability of Se NPs. To investigate the influence of pH on the stability of positive and negative Se NPs sols, solutions with varying pH levels were added to the samples in a 1:1 ratio. A solution was prepared by combining phosphoric acid, acetic acid and boric acid in a proportion of 0.04 M. In a 2 L volumetric flask, 5.49 mL H3PO4, 4.58 mL CH3COOH, and 4.95 g H3BO3 were combined. With distilled water, the capacity was reduced to 2 L. A 700 mL 0.2 M NaOH solution was also made separately. To create the needed pH buffer, 100 mL of acidic solution was mixed with x mL of 0.2 M NaOH solution. The resultant solution’s average hydrodynamic radius and ζ-potential were then measured [51]. The volume of NaOH utilized at the various pH levels was measured and is shown in Table S1 (Supplementary).
To study the effect of the ionic strength of solutions on the stability of Se NPs, five series of solutions were created. The particle radius was measured in solutions of sodium chloride (NaCl), ferric chloride (FeCl3), barium chloride (BaCl2), sodium sulfate (Na2SO4), and potassium phosphate (K3PO4) at 0.1 M, 0.25 M, 0.5 M, 0.75 M, and 1 M concentrations. Se NP sol and salt solution samples were combined in a 1:1 volume ratio [52].
To study the effect of storage time on the stability of Se NPs, samples were examined by DLS for 14 days. This study was conducted every two days. The samples were stored in the refrigerator at 0–+4 °C.

2.5. Potential Antibacterial and Fungicidal Activity of Se NPs-CTAC

Escherichia coli and Micrococcus luteus, as well as Mucor, were cultivated to study the inhibitory properties of the precursor (selenious acid), stabilizer (CTAC), reducing agent (ascorbic acid), and Se NPs-CTAC.
The main stages of the preparation of nutrient media and the cultivation of microorganisms are described in detail in Supplementary (Section S2). Table 2 shows how were prepared samples of each preparation.
For inoculation, a standard microbial suspension was used. To prepare a microbial suspension, microorganisms were washed off from the nutrient medium with distilled water. The resulting suspension was filtered through a sterile cotton-gauze filter and diluted with distilled water to a concentration equivalent to 0.5 according to the McFarland standard [53], diluted 100 times in isotonic solution. McFarland standard was confirmed via optical density of suspensions using Shimadzu UV-1800 spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan). Absorption at a wavelength of 625 nm was in the range of 0.08–0.10 which corresponds to concentration of 1.5 × 108 CFU/mL for bacteria and 0.75 × 109 CFU/mL for Mucor [53]. The final concentration of microorganisms in solution after dilutions was 3 × 105 CFU/mL for Escherichia coli and Micrococcus luteus, and 1.5 × 105 CFU/mL for Mucor. Inoculum of 0.1 mL was added to test tubes containing 0.1 mL of samples 1–5 of selenious acid, ascorbic acid, CTAC or Se NPs-CTAC, according to Table 2. Resulting suspensions in the amount of 100 µL were sown on the nutrient medium. Petri dishes were incubated at +37 °C for 24 h (Escherichia coli and Micrococcus luteus) and 48 h (Mucor) in a thermostat (Binder GmbH, Tuttlingen, Germany). After incubation, CFU were calculated by the method of serial dilutions. For this, 9 mL of distilled water were added to test tubes. A volume of 1 mL of inoculate was added to the first tube, then it was sequentially transferred to the next tube until the inoculate was diluted 105 times [54]. The procedure was repeated for each of sample. The experiment was performed in three repetitions.
The potetnial antibacterial activity of Se NPs was also studied by the disk diffusion method with determination of diameter of inhibition zones in mm [55]. Escherichia coli and Micrococcus luteus were also used for the potetnial antibacterial activity assay. Briefly, sterile filter paper discs (2 mm) were impregnated with samples 1–5 of selenious acid, ascorbic acid, CTAC or Se NPs-CTAC, according to Table 2. Petri dishes were filled out by the nutrient media prepared by the same method (Section S2, Supplementary). The surface of the nutrient media was inoculated by bacteria suspension using Drygalsky spatula [56]. Finally, the impregnated disks were placed on the inoculated nutrient media and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. After incubation, the diameter of the growth inhibition zones was measured. The tests were triplicated.

2.6. Statistical Data Processing

Experimental data processing was carried out in the Statistica 12.0 software (Statsoft, Tulsa, OK, USA). The Neural Statistica Network package (Statsoft, Tulsa, USA) was used to construct ternary surfaces. Graphical processing of experimental data was carried out in the Origin Pro software (https://www.originlab.com/, OriginLab, Northampton, MA, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Optimization of Parameters for the Synthesis of Se NPs-CTAC

Table 3 displays the numerical values of the average hydrodynamic radii of particles and ζ-potential of samples 1–9 prepared according to Table 1.
The determination of the concentration of Se NPs is described in Supplementary (Section S3). Figure 2 depicts the histogram of the hydrodynamic radii distribution of Se NPs in Sample 1.
The DLS findings revealed that all samples exhibited a monomodal particle size distribution. The lowest size (rav < 22 nm) of Se NPs was discovered in samples 1, 2, 4, and 8. It is crucial to note that samples 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, and 9 coagulated within 24 h after synthesis. As a result, samples 6 and 8 were chosen to explore the influence of ionic strength and pH on the stability of Se NPs sols. It is worth noting that the negative value of the electrokinetic potential in samples 3, 6 and 9 is due to the fact that desorption of the positive layer of CTAC occurred due to the achievement of the second critical micelle concentration [47]. As a result, the potential-forming layer is formed due to negatively charged ions of selenious acid.
Three-dimensional ternary dependencies were created as a consequence of mathematical processing of the data (Figure 3 and Figure 4).
The quantities of selenious acid and CTAC have the largest influence on the average hydrodynamic radius, according to an examination of the ternary surface (Figure 3). At 0.062–0.178 mol selenious acid and 0.03 mol CTAC, the minimal size of Se NPs was obtained. When the quantity of selenious acid was less than 0.06 mol or greater than 0.18 mol, as well as when the amount of CTAC was greater than 0.04 mol, the maximum size of Se NPs was generated.

3.2. Transmission Electron Microscopy of Se NPs-CTAC

Interpretation of results of TEM is schematically presented in Figure 4.
The ζ-potential of Se NPs was discovered to be strongly dependent on the concentrations of CTAC and ascorbic acid (Figure 4). The surface of the Se NPs develops a negative charge (ζ > 0) when exposed to >0.06 mol CTAC and 1 mol ascorbic acid, and a positive charge (ζ > 0) when exposed to >0.06 mol CTAC and 1 mol ascorbic acid. It was also discovered that a surface potential-forming layer, comprised of acidic residues of selenious acid (SeO32−) and CTAC, forms on the surface of positive and negative Se NPs, determining the particle charge. Figure 4 depicts the relationship between the appearance of the micelles and the component ratio.
TEM was used to confirm the assumption regarding the structure of the micelles of positive and negative Se NPs. TEM images (Figure 4) revealed that negative Se NPs contained one percent of 50–85 nm spherical particles, which corresponds with results presented in [49]. One percent with a diameter of 20–50 nm was also identified in positive Se NPs samples.

3.3. Computer Quantum Chemical Modeling of CTAC Molecule and Se NPs-CTAC Molecular Complex

Computer quantum chemical modeling was used to simulate the CTAC molecule and Se NPs-CTAC molecular complex (Figure 5, Table 4).
Quantum chemical computer modeling results show that the total energy of the CTAC molecule is −803.904 kcal/mol, and the energy of the Se-CTAC molecular complex is −12,795.691 kcal/mol. A decrease in the total energy of the system indicates the energetic advantage of chemical bond formation between Se and CTAC [57].

3.4. Spectral Characteristics of Se NPs-CTAC

The results of the study of the spectral characteristics of Se NPs-CTAC are shown in Figure 6.
The analysis of the FTIR spectrum of CTAC (Figure 6a) showed the presence of oscillation bands at 1377 and 1651 cm−1, which correspond to symmetric oscillations of the CH2 group, as well as bands at 2851, 2870, 2887, 2899, 2916, 2920 and 2924 cm−1, characteristic of the CH2 group. In the range from 1265 to 1344 cm−1, bands of symmetrical oscillations of the CH3 group are observed. The oscillation bands at 2951, 2955, 2959, 3021 and 3028 cm−1 are also characteristic of the CH3 group. In addition, oscillation bands at 1479 and 1494 cm−1 are characteristic of the NH+ bond [58].
The analysis of the FTIR spectrum of Se NPs-CTAC (Figure 6a) showed fluctuations characteristic of the CH2 group were also observed at 1377, 2851 and 2920 cm−1. Bands corresponding to fluctuations of the CH3 group are observed at 2951, 3026 cm−1 and in the range from 1265 and 1344 cm−1. Vibrations of the CH group (3399 and 3483 cm−1) and NH+ bonds (1479, 1493 cm−1) are also present on the FTIR spectrum. In addition, the FTIR spectrum of Se NPs-CTAC contains fluctuations at 592 and 665 cm−1, characteristic of Se, and fluctuations at 721 cm−1, characteristic of the Se-O bond [59].
As a result of the analysis of the FTIR spectra, it can be concluded that there is a decrease in the intensity of bands in the regions from 2851 to 3026 cm−1 and from 1265 to 1377 cm−1, characteristic of the CH2 and CH3 groups, which indicates that CTAC was present on the surface of Se NPs, oriented by a hydrophobic center to Se NPs, which is consistent with the results of computer quantum chemical modeling.
Analysis of the obtained absorption spectrum of UV–visible spectroscopy (Figure 6b) showed that Se NPs-CTAC have an absorption band at λ = 335 nm. Thus, the obtained spectral characteristics correspond to the results presented in other works [47,60,61].

3.5. The Stability of Se NPs-CTAC at Different pH

In the next step, a study was conducted on the effect of pH on the stability of Se NPs. Figure 7 shows the pH dependence of ζ-potential and the mean hydrodynamic radius for positive and negative Se NP sols.
The pH of negative Se NPs sols and positive Se NPs sol’s reversal show fundamentally different dependences on the average hydrodynamic radius of nanoparticles, which confirms the results obtained in the previous work [47]. It was found that at pH 10, a large loss of aggregation stability of the positive Se NP sol was observed, which is confirmed by the decrease in ζ-potential at these pH values. At 5 < pH < 8, an increase in particle size of the positive Se NP sol was again observed, probably because the isoelectric point of CTAC was reached [57]. For negative Se NPs sols, increasing pH does not affect aggregate stability, indicating high stability across the studied range [62,63].

3.6. The Stability of Positive and Negative Se NPs Sols at Various Ions

In the next step, the influence of various ions on the stability of positive and negative Se NPs sols was studied. The effects of the presence of cations and anions on the stability of Se NPs were analyzed by DLS. The obtained dependence of the mean hydrodynamic radius of Se NPs on the concentration of cations and anions is shown in Figure 8.
An analysis of the size dependence of Se NPs (Figure 8) showed that anions had a slight effect on particle aggregation in sols containing negative Se NPs, and particle size did not change over the entire concentration range [64]. It can be seen that Na+ ions have no effect on the size of the nanoparticles. At the same time, according to the data in Figure 8, Ba2+ and Fe3+ ions have the greatest aggregation effect on the negative Se NPs sol. The same results were obtained in study of Se NPs stabilized with cocamidopropyl betaine [47]. Ba2+ ions increased the particle size of the negative Se NPs sol from 25 nm to 175 nm, accompanied by precipitate formation [65]. The lowest concentration of Fe3+ ions (0.1 mol/L) resulted in a slight increase in particle size to 30 nm, while higher concentrations (up to 1 mol/L) resulted in a sharp increase to 225 nm.
For the positive Se NP sol, an inverse relationship was found. Anions have a significant effect on the aggregation of Se NPs. This is because PO43− and SO42− ions cause an increase in the ionic strength of the solution, leading to significant expansion of Se NPs up to 200 and 100 nm, respectively [26,66,67]. The SO42− ion dependence analysis showed that increasing the concentration of the Na2SO4 solution to 0.25 M did not change the radius of the Se NPs and the solution remained stable. A further increase in the SO42− ion concentration significantly increases the mean hydrodynamic radius of Se NPs. In the following dependencies, the initial solidification process of Se NPs resulted in the precipitation of a highly solidifying electrolyte (Na3PO4) over the considered concentration range [65]. At concentration 1 mol/L PO43− Se NPs had the largest size and solidification rate.
Figure 8 shows that cations do not significantly affect the CTAC-stabilized positive Se NP sol. It is worth noting that Fe3+ ions influence the size of the positive Se NP sol. This is because there are three Cl− anions for every Fe3+ cation, which have a corresponding effect on the size of Se NPs. Since Se NPs are used in combination with various impurities in veterinary, pharmaceutical, cosmetic compositions and even biologically active substances, the data obtained consider the high potential of practical application of Se NPs-CTAC [60,61,67,68,69,70].

3.7. The Stability of Se NPs-CTAC at Storing

At the next stage, the stability of the positive and negative Se NPs sols at the exposure time was investigated. The data obtained are presented in Figure 9.
Figure 9 shows that the average hydrodynamic radius of the positive Se NPs sol increased significantly during the storage of samples. During 14 days of the experiment, the average hydrodynamic radius of Se NPs increased from 25 ± 3 to 110 ± 9 nm, which is quite normal for Se NPs complexes [11,71,72]. At the same time, it is important to note that the average hydrodynamic radius of the negative Se NPs sol did not change significantly during the experiment (total difference was 6 nm) which characterizes its high stability at storing.

3.8. Potential Antimicrobial Activity of Se NPs-CTAC

The potential antimicrobial activity of preparations containing precursors, stabilizers, reducers and Se NPs-CTAC (Table 2) was studied against Escherichia coli and Micrococcus luteus, as well as Mucor. The results are shown in Table 5.
According to Table 5, ascorbic acid as well as selenic acid have not antimicrobial activity. Samples of these series were characterized by the growth of numerous colonies reaching 300 CFU/mL after dilutions, which corresponds to results of other works [73,74]. The results of the experiment revealed potential antimicrobial activity in the CTAC series. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was 8.322 mmol/L for Escherichia coli and Micrococcus luteus, and 83.221 mmol/L for Mucor. Similar results were reported in studies of cetyltrimethylammonium chloride as well as cetyltrimethylammonium bromide [75,76,77]. Expected, Se NPs-CTAC samples had the highest activity. The presence of 0.1940 mmoll/L Se NPs-CTAC provided inactivation of Escherichia coli, Micrococcus luteus and Mucor. Interestingly, MIC for Micrococcus luteus was detected at 0.0194 mL/L Se NPs-CTAC. Thus, potential antibacterial activity of Se NPs-CTAC against Micrococcus luteus is higher than other forms of nanoparticles reported in [78,79,80,81]. MIC of Se NPs-CTAC for Escherichia coli (0.1940 mmoll/L) was lower than MIC of Se NPs stabilized with polysorbate [82], bovine serum albumin and chitosan [11], as well as green synthesized Se NPs [83]. Regarding potential antifungal activity, the results obtained corresponds to results of other authors tested various forms and complexes of Se NPs on Mucor, Penicillium digitatum, Rhizoctonia solani, Lichtheimia corymbifera and Syncephalastrum racemosum [84,85,86].
High potential of antibacterial activity of Se NPs-CTAC was also confirmed using the disk diffusion method. The data obtained are presented in Figure 10 and Table 6.
Analysis of Figure 10a showed that in samples of ascorbic and selenic acids, Micrococcus luteus culture growth to the edges of the disks was observed. There was no inhibition zone. A stable isolate was observed in samples 1–3 of CTAC where the inhibition zones were 17–31 mm (Table 6). In all samples of Se NPs-CTAC, a stable isolate was observed with an inhibition zones 18–31 mm. According to Table 6, the largest inhibition zones were observed in both sample of CTAC (832.21 mmol/L) and Se NPs-CTAC (19.39 mmol/L). Similarly, Figure 10b shows that ascorbic and selenic acids have not an antibacterial effect against Escherichia coli—all samples were characterized by the continuous growth of disks without inhibition zones. The greatest effect was observed in sample of Se NPs-CTAC with concentration 19.39 mmol/L (33 mm). The results obtained corresponds to results of other authors observed inhibition zones of 12–25 mm at treatment of bacteria by Se NPs [87]. In addition, Islam et al. [88] described inhibition zones of 6–23 mm observed at treatment of Aspergillus niger with biosynthesized Se NPs, which also confirms potential antifungal activity of Se NPs.
The cationic surfactant CTAC belongs to a class of quaternary ammonium compounds known to have antimicrobial properties. These compounds actively act on sensitive bacterial cells, adsorb to and penetrate cell wall components [75]. Jyoti et al. [89] in their study demonstrated a mechanism of fungicidal action of CTAC based on cellular and nuclear membrane damage. After interacting with the constituents of the microbial cell membrane, disruptions occur in the molecular matter system, leading to the degradation of heterofunctional organic molecules. Consequently, the formation of micelles from quaternary ammonium compounds and cell membrane components ultimately leads to membrane solubilization and cell lysis [90,91]. Significant antibacterial and antifungal effects were observed in CTAC-treated samples in all cultures, and these results are consistent with those of other researchers [92,93]. Se NPs have natural antibacterial and fungicidal effects on various crops [94,95,96,97,98,99]. Researchers are now observing and explaining different mechanisms of action of Se NPs on microorganisms. According to Han et al. [100], the bactericidal activity of Se NPs is based on the degradation of microbial proteins. Lesnichaya et al. [101] reported that SeNPs contribute to the inactivation of the natural mechanisms of membrane transport of ions and nutrients across the cell wall, blocking the vital activity of microbial cells. Developing studies on the mechanism of antibacterial activity of Se NPs, Lesnichaya et al. [102] discovered that the slow releasing Se ions from the surface of Se NPs interacts with -SH, -NH, or -COOH functional groups of proteins and enzymes, and subsequently can lead to the loss of their tertiary and quaternary structure and function. The authors also mentioned that Se NPs inhibit the activity of dehydrogenase enzymes and disrupt the integrity of cell membranes. Se NPs is known to cause overproduction of reactive oxygen species, disruption of membrane potential, and degradation of internal adenosine triphosphate [103,104]. Liang et al. [105] found that Se NPs inhibit the ability of bacteria to adhere to surfaces and form bacterial membranes. An equally interesting effect worth noting is the photocatalytic activity of Se NPs against bacteria reported by Sahoo et al. [106]. Taking into account the results of other researchers and the results of this study, the hypothesis of antibacterial action of CTAC, Se NPs and Se NPs-CTAC was proposed (Figure 11).
The presented hypothesis can be summarized as follows: introduction of the Se NPs-CTAC molecular complex into bacterial or fungal cell cultures leads to degradation of proteins and polysaccharides and disruption of microbial cell structure, allowing an enhanced penetration of Se NPs via damaged cytoplasmic membrane, which causes oxidative damage and changes in the intensity of reactive oxygen species [107,108]. Further study of Se NPs-CTAC will be aimed at confirming this hypothesis.
Therefore, due to the synergistic effect of its components, the Se NPs-CTAC molecular complex has potential antibacterial and antifungal properties, which determines the broad potential of this formulation for practical application.

4. Conclusions

In this work, a method for the synthesis of Se NPs-CTAC was developed. The parameters for the synthesis of Se NPs-CTAC were studied and optimized.
According to the results obtained, Se NPs in stable sols have a radius of 21–27 nm. It was found that the ζ-potential of Se NPs is significantly affected by the concentrations of CTAC and ascorbic acid. The surface of Se NPs acquires a negative charge (ζ > 0) when exposed to >0.06 mol CTAC and 1 mol ascorbic acid and a positive charge (ζ > 0) when exposed to >0.06 mol CTAC and 1 mol ascorbic acid.
It was found that a surface potential formation layer consisting of acidic selenite residues (SeO32-) and CTAC is formed on the surface of positive and negative Se NPs sols and determines the charge of the particles. A study of the samples using TEM showed that both negative and positive Se NPs sols contain a fraction of spherical particles. The particle size in negative Se NPs sol was 50–85 nm; in positive Se NPs sol—20–50 nm. According to the results of quantum chemical computer modeling, the total energy of the CTAC molecule is −803.904 kcal/mol and the energy of the Se NPs-CTAC molecular complex is −12,795.691 kcal/mol. The decrease in the total energy of the system indicates that the formation of a chemical bond between Se NPs and CTAC is energetically favorable. The stability of the Se NP-CTAC complex was studied at different pH values and in the presence of different ions. It was found that the negative Se NPs sol was the most stable.
It was found that Se NPs-CTAC have potential antibacterial and antifungal activities compared to individual solutions of precursor, stabilizer, and reducing agent. Experimental results show that the minimum concentrations of Se NPs-CTAC required to exhibit potential antibacterial properties are 0.194 mmol/L for Escherichia coli, 0.0194 mmol/L for Micrococcus luteus and 0.194 mmol/L for Mucor. Disk diffusion methods revealed inhibition zones of 12–33 mm for Escherichia coli and 18–31 mm for Micrococcus luteus, which also confirms potential antibacterial activity of Se NPs-CTAC at various concentrations. The enhanced potential antibacterial and antifungal activity of Se NPs-CTAC may be due to the synergistic effect of the antibacterial properties of CTAC and Se NPs. Further research will be conducted to study the mechanisms of influence of CTAC, Se NPs and Se NPs-CTAC on microbial cells.
The research results can be further applied in the development of products containing Se NPs, such as veterinary drugs, pharmaceuticals, and cosmetics. We also plan to synthesize Se NPs stabilized with various quaternary ammonium compounds and study their activity and potential ways of application.

Limitations of This Study

Results of this study revealed the potential antibacterial and antifungal activity of Se NPs-CTAC against Escherichia coli, Micrococcus luteus and Mucor. To prove antibacterial and antifungal activity, Se NPs-CTAC will be tested for four bacterial and four fungal pathogens. In this study, we used Mucor as a fungi model that is widespread but basically harmless mold. For further study of potential antifungal activity of Se NPs-CTAC, Mucor should be considered along with isolated mycotoxins. Potential antifungal activity of Se NPs-CTAC against harmful fungi species should be studied as well. Further study of the effect on Se NPs-CTAC on major bacterial or fungal pathogens will show the perspectives of application of developed nanocomplex against multidrug-resistant bacterial strains.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nano13243128/s1, Section S1: Preparation of NaOH solutions; Table S1: NaOH volumes with corresponding pH values; Section S2: The main stages of preparation of nutrient media and cultivation of Escherichia coli, Micrococcus luteus and Mucor; Section S3: Determination of the concentration of Se NPs.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.B. (Anastasiya Blinova) and A.B. (Andrey Blinov); methodology, A.B. (Andrey Blinov) and A.G. (Alexey Gvozdenko); software, A.G. (Alexey Golik); validation, A.K., A.N. and A.S.; formal analysis, A.K., A.N. and A.A.; investigation, Z.R., A.G. (Alexey Gvozdenko), M.K., A.A. and D.F.; resources, A.N. and M.A.S.; data curation, A.B. (Anastasiya Blinova); writing—original draft preparation, A.B. (Andrey Blinov), Z.R., A.G. (Alexey Gvozdenko), M.K., D.F., A.A., A.G. (Alexey Golik), and N.S.A., S.K.; writing—review and editing, A.N., A.S., M.A.S. and M.T.; visualization, A.G. (Alexey Golik); supervision, A.S.; project administration, A.B. (Andrey Blinov) and A.N.; funding acquisition, A.B. (Anastasiya Blinova). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Russian Science Foundation grant No. 23-16-00120, https://rscf.ru/project/23-16-00120/ (assessed on 12 December 2023) and Researchers Supporting Project number (RSP2023R70), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Data Availability Statement

All raw data are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors express their sincere appreciation to the Researchers Supporting Project number (RSP2023R70), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Synthesis and characterization of selenium nanoparticles stabilized with cethyltrimethylammonium chloride were carried out with support of the Russian Science Foundation (Project number 23-16-00120).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Nieto-Argüello, A.; Torres-Castro, A.; Villaurrutia-Arenas, R.; Martínez-Sanmiguel, J.J.; González, M.U.; García-Martín, J.M.; Cholula-Díaz, J.L. Green Synthesis and Characterization of Gold-Based Anisotropic Nanostructures Using Bimetallic Nanoparticles as Seeds. Dalton Trans. 2021, 50, 16923–16928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Lee, S.; Cho, H.; Kim, H.J.; Hong, J.W.; Lee, Y.W. Shape- and Size-Controlled Palladium Nanocrystals and Their Electrocatalytic Properties in the Oxidation of Ethanol. Materials 2021, 14, 2970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Gautam, S.; Hadley, A.M.K.; Gates, B.D. Controlled Growth of Platinum Nanoparticles during Electrodeposition Using Halide Ion Containing Additives. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2022, 169, 112508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Li, Y.; Lo, W.-S.; Zhang, F.; Si, X.; Chou, L.-Y.; Liu, X.-Y.; Williams, B.P.; Li, Y.-H.; Jung, S.-H.; Hsu, Y.-S.; et al. Creating an Aligned Interface between Nanoparticles and MOFs by Concurrent Replacement of Capping Agents. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 5182–5190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Pecoraro, B.M.; Leal, D.F.; Frias-De-Diego, A.; Browning, M.; Odle, J.; Crisci, E. The Health Benefits of Selenium in Food Animals: A Review. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2022, 13, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Hossain, A.; Skalicky, M.; Brestic, M.; Maitra, S.; Sarkar, S.; Ahmad, Z.; Vemuri, H.; Garai, S.; Mondal, M.; Bhatt, R.; et al. Selenium Biofortification: Roles, Mechanisms, Responses and Prospects. Molecules 2021, 26, 881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Schiavon, M.; Nardi, S.; dalla Vecchia, F.; Ertani, A. Selenium Biofortification in the 21st Century: Status and Challenges for Healthy Human Nutrition. Plant Soil 2020, 453, 245–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Rizalputri, L.N.; Anshori, I.; Handayani, M.; Gumilar, G.; Septiani, N.L.W.; Hartati, Y.W.; Annas, M.S.; Purwidyantri, A.; Prabowo, B.A.; Yuliarto, B. Facile and Controllable Synthesis of Monodisperse Gold Nanoparticle Bipyramid for Electrochemical Dopamine Sensor. Nanotechnology 2022, 34, 055502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fouda, A.; Hassan, S.E.-D.; Eid, A.M.; Abdel-Rahman, M.A.; Hamza, M.F. Light Enhanced the Antimicrobial, Anticancer, and Catalytic Activities of Selenium Nanoparticles Fabricated by Endophytic Fungal Strain, Penicillium crustosum EP-1. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 11834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Escobar-Ramírez, M.C.; Castañeda-Ovando, A.; Pérez-Escalante, E.; Rodríguez-Serrano, G.M.; Ramírez-Moreno, E.; Quintero-Lira, A.; Contreras-López, E.; Añorve-Morga, J.; Jaimez-Ordaz, J.; González-Olivares, L.G. Antimicrobial Activity of Se-Nanoparticles from Bacterial Biotransformation. Fermentation 2021, 7, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Filipović, N.; Ušjak, D.; Milenković, M.T.; Zheng, K.; Liverani, L.; Boccaccini, A.R.; Stevanović, M.M. Comparative Study of the Antimicrobial Activity of Selenium Nanoparticles with Different Surface Chemistry and Structure. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021, 8, 624621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Yan, J.-K.; Qiu, W.-Y.; Wang, Y.-Y.; Wang, W.-H.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, H.-N. Fabrication and Stabilization of Biocompatible Selenium Nanoparticles by Carboxylic Curdlans with Various Molecular Properties. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 179, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Abadi, B.; Hosseinalipour, S.; Nikzad, S.; Pourshaikhali, S.; Fathalipour-Rayeni, H.; Shafiei, G.; Adeli-Sardou, M.; Shakibaie, M.; Forootanfar, H. Capping Agents for Selenium Nanoparticles in Biomedical Applications. J. Clust. Sci. 2022, 34, 1669–1690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhang, T.; Qi, M.; Wu, Q.; Xiang, P.; Tang, D.; Li, Q. Recent Research Progress on the Synthesis and Biological Effects of Selenium Nanoparticles. Front. Nutr. 2023, 10, 1183487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Bisht, N.; Phalswal, P.; Khanna, P.K. Selenium Nanoparticles: A Review on Synthesis and Biomedical Applications. Mater. Adv. 2022, 3, 1415–1431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sarkar, J.; Mridha, D.; Davoodbasha, M.A.; Banerjee, J.; Chanda, S.; Ray, K.; Roychowdhury, T.; Acharya, K.; Sarkar, J. A State-of-the-Art Systemic Review on Selenium Nanoparticles: Mechanisms and Factors Influencing Biogenesis and Its Potential Applications. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2023, 201, 5000–5036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Souza, L.M.d.S.; Dibo, M.; Sarmiento, J.J.P.; Seabra, A.B.; Medeiros, L.P.; Lourenço, I.M.; Kobayashi, R.K.T.; Nakazato, G. Biosynthesis of Selenium Nanoparticles Using Combinations of Plant Extracts and Their Antibacterial Activity. Curr. Res. Green Sustain. Chem. 2022, 5, 100303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ghaderi, R.S.; Adibian, F.; Sabouri, Z.; Davoodi, J.; Kazemi, M.; Amel Jamehdar, S.; Meshkat, Z.; Soleimanpour, S.; Daroudi, M. Green Synthesis of Selenium Nanoparticle by Abelmoschus Esculentus Extract and Assessment of Its Antibacterial Activity. Mater. Technol. 2021, 37, 1289–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sarkar, R.D.; Lahkar, P.; Kalita, M.C. Glycosmis pentaphylla (Retz.) DC Leaf Extract Mediated Synthesis of Selenium Nanoparticle and Investigation of Its Antibacterial Activity against Urinary Tract Pathogens. Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 2022, 17, 100894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mariadoss, A.V.A.; Saravanakumar, K.; Sathiyaseelan, A.; Naveen, K.V.; Wang, M.H. Enhancement of Anti-Bacterial Potential of Green Synthesized Selenium Nanoparticles by Starch Encapsulation. Microb. Pathog. 2022, 167, 105544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Shakeri, F.; Zaboli, F.; Fattahi, E.; Babavalian, H. Biosynthesis of Selenium Nanoparticles and Evaluation of Its Antibacterial Activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2022, 2022, 411804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Salem, S.S.; Badawy, M.S.E.M.; Al-Askar, A.A.; Arishi, A.A.; Elkady, F.M.; Hashem, A.H. Green Biosynthesis of Selenium Nanoparticles Using Orange Peel Waste: Characterization, Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Activities against Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria. Life 2022, 12, 893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. El-Ghazaly, M.A.; Fadel, N.; Rashed, E.; El-Batal, A.; Kenawy, S.A. Anti-Inflammatory Effect of Selenium Nanoparticles on the Inflammation Induced in Irradiated Rats. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2017, 95, 101–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Hashemi-Firouzi, N.; Afshar, S.; Asl, S.S.; Samzadeh-Kermani, A.; Gholamigeravand, B.; Amiri, K.; Majidi, M.; Shahidi, S. The Effects of Polyvinyl Alcohol-Coated Selenium Nanoparticles on Memory Impairment in Rats. Metab. Brain Dis. 2022, 37, 3011–3021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Tran, P.A.; O’Brien-Simpson, N.; Palmer, J.A.; Bock, N.; Reynolds, E.C.; Webster, T.J.; Deva, A.; Morrison, W.A.; O’Connor, A.J. Selenium Nanoparticles as Anti-Infective Implant Coatings for Trauma Orthopedics against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Epidermidis: In Vitro and in Vivo Assessment. Int. J. Nanomed. 2019, 14, 4613–4624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Blinov, A.V.; Kostenko, K.V.; Gvozdenko, A.A.; Maglakelidze, D.G.; Golik, A.B.; Nagdalian, A.A.; Statsenko, E.N.; Nikulnikova, N.N.; Remizov, D.M.; Verevkina, M.N.; et al. Study of Stabilization of Selenium Nanoparticles by Polysaccharides. J. Hyg. Eng. Des. 2021, 34, 209–216. [Google Scholar]
  27. Zhang, C.; Zhai, X.; Zhao, G.; Ren, F.; Leng, X. Synthesis, Characterization, and Controlled Release of Selenium Nanoparticles Stabilized by Chitosan of Different Molecular Weights. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 134, 158–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kong, H.; Yang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Fang, Y.; Nishinari, K.; Phillips, G.O. Synthesis and Antioxidant Properties of Gum Arabic-Stabilized Selenium Nanoparticles. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2014, 65, 155–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ameh, T.; Zarzosa, K.; Dickinson, J.; Braswell, W.E.; Sayes, C.M. Nanoparticle Surface Stabilizing Agents Influence Antibacterial Action. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1119550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cortés, H.; Hernández-Parra, H.; Bernal-Chávez, S.A.; Prado-Audelo, M.L.D.; Caballero-Florán, I.H.; Borbolla-Jiménez, F.V.; González-Torres, M.; Magaña, J.J.; Leyva-Gómez, G. Non-Ionic Surfactants for Stabilization of Polymeric Nanoparticles for Biomedical Uses. Materials 2021, 14, 3197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Jennings, M.C.; Minbiole, K.P.C.; Wuest, W.M. Quaternary Ammonium Compounds: An Antimicrobial Mainstay and Platform for Innovation to Address Bacterial Resistance. ACS Infect. Dis. 2015, 1, 288–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Colafemmina, G.; Palazzo, G.; Mateos, H.; Amin, S.; Fameau, A.-L.; Olsson, U.; Gentile, L. The Cooling Process Effect on the Bilayer Phase State of the CTAC/Cetearyl Alcohol/Water Surfactant Gel. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2020, 597, 124821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Slesiona, N.; Thamm, S.; Stolle, H.L.K.S.; Weißenborn, V.; Müller, P.; Csáki, A.; Fritzsche, W. DNA-Biofunctionalization of CTAC-Capped Gold Nanocubes. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Jiao, Y.; Niu, L.N.; Ma, S.; Li, J.; Tay, F.R.; Chen, J.H. Quaternary ammonium-based biomedical materials: State-of-the-art, toxicological aspects and antimicrobial resistance. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2017, 71, 53–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Kumar, A.; Prasad, K.S. Role of Nano-Selenium in Health and Environment. J. Biotechnol. 2021, 325, 152–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Mirza, K.; Naaz, F.; Ahmad, T.; Manzoor, N.; Sardar, M. Development of Cost-Effective, Ecofriendly Selenium Nanoparticle-Functionalized Cotton Fabric for Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Activity. Fermentation 2023, 9, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chauhan, P.; Chaudhary, S. Role of Surface Modification on Selenium Nanoparticles: Enumerating the Optical, Thermal and Structural Properties. Opt. Mater. 2019, 97, 109380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chauhan, P.; Bhasin, K.K.; Chaudhary, S. High Selectivity and Adsorption Proficiency of Surfactant-Coated Selenium Nanoparticles for Dye Removal Application. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 61344–61359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Meena, S.K.; Meena, C. The Implication of Adsorption Preferences of Ions and Surfactants on the Shape Control of Gold Nanoparticles: A Microscopic, Atomistic Perspective. Nanoscale 2021, 13, 19549–19560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Shurygina, I.A.; Prozorova, G.F.; Trukhan, I.S.; Korzhova, S.A.; Fadeeva, T.V.; Pozdnyakov, A.S.; Dremina, N.N.; Emel’yanov, A.I.; Kuznetsova, N.P.; Shurygin, M.G. NonToxic Silver/Poly-1-Vinyl-1,2,4-Triazole Nanocomposite Materials with Antibacterial Activity. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ali, A.; Ovais, M.; Cui, X.; Rui, Y.; Chen, C. Safety Assessment of Nanomaterials for Antimicrobial Applications. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2020, 33, 1082–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Ali, A.; Ovais, M.; Zhou, H.; Rui, Y. Tailoring metal-organic frameworks-based nanozymes for bacterial theranostics. Biomaterials 2021, 275, 120951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Hemeg, H. Nanomaterials for Alternative Antibacterial Therapy. Int. J. Nanomed. 2017, 12, 8211–8225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Wang, L.; Hu, C.; Shao, L. The Antimicrobial Activity of Nanoparticles: Present Situation and Prospects for the Future. Int. J. Nanomed. 2017, 12, 1227–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Eleraky, N.E.; Allam, A.; Hassan, S.B.; Omar, M.M. Nanomedicine Fight against Antibacterial Resistance: An Overview of the Recent Pharmaceutical Innovations. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Yang, X.; Yang, J.; Wang, L.; Ran, B.; Jia, Y.; Zhang, L.; Yang, G.; Shao, H.; Jiang, X. Pharmaceutical intermediate-modified gold nanoparticles: Against multidrug-resistant bacteria and wound-healing application via an electrospun scaffold. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 5737–5745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Blinov, A.V.; Nagdalian, A.A.; Siddiqui, S.A.; Maglakelidze, D.G.; Gvozdenko, A.A.; Blinova, A.A.; Yasnaya, M.A.; Golik, A.B.; Rebezov, M.B.; Jafari, S.M.; et al. Synthesis and Characterization of Selenium Nanoparticles Stabilized with Cocamidopropyl Betaine. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 21975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kattenborn, T.; Leitloff, J.; Schiefer, F.; Hinz, S. Review on Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) in Vegetation Remote Sensing. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2021, 173, 24–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kalinin, S.V.; Ophus, C.; Voyles, P.M.; Erni, R.; Kepaptsoglou, D.; Grillo, V.; Lupini, A.R.; Oxley, M.P.; Schwenker, E.; Chan, M.K.Y.; et al. Machine Learning in Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy. Nat. Rev. Methods Prim. 2022, 2, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Fu, R.; Lu, Y.; Cheng, W. Soft Plasmonics: Design, Fabrication, Characterization, and Applications. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2021, 10, 2101436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ferro, C.; Florindo, H.F.; Santos, H.A. Selenium Nanoparticles for Biomedical Applications: From Development and Characterization to Therapeutics. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2021, 10, 2100598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Gallego-Urrea, J.A.; Perez Holmberg, J.; Hassellöv, M. Influence of Different Types of Natural Organic Matter on Titania Nanoparticle Stability: Effects of Counter Ion Concentration and PH. Environ. Sci. Nano 2014, 1, 181–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Balouiri, M.; Sadiki, M.; Ibnsouda, S.K. Methods for in Vitro Evaluating Antimicrobial Activity: A Review. J. Pharm. Anal. 2016, 6, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Hoffmann, S.; Walter, S.; Blume, A.-K.; Fuchs, S.; Schmidt, C.; Scholz, A.; Gerlach, R.G. High-Throughput Quantification of Bacterial-Cell Interactions Using Virtual Colony Counts. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2018, 8, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Bin Ahmad, M.; Lim, J.J.; Shameli, K.; Ibrahim, N.A.; Tay, M.Y.; Chieng, B.W. Antibacterial Activity of Silver Bionanocomposites Synthesized by Chemical Reduction Route. Chem. Cent. J. 2012, 6, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Leñini, C.; Rodriguez Ayala, F.; Goñi, A.J.; Rateni, L.; Nakamura, A.; Grau, R.R. Probiotic Properties of Bacillus Subtilis DG101 Isolated from the Traditional Japanese Fermented Food Nattō. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1253480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Blinov, A.V.; Maglakelidze, D.G.; Rekhman, Z.A.; Yasnaya, M.A.; Gvozdenko, A.A.; Golik, A.B.; Blinova, A.A.; Kolodkin, M.A.; Alharbi, N.S.; Kadaikunnan, S.; et al. Investigation of the Effect of Dispersion Medium Parameters on the Aggregative Stability of Selenium Nanoparticles Stabilized with Catamine AB. Micromachines 2023, 14, 433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Liu, Y.; Zhong, Q.; Zhang, T. Preparation of Cationic Surfactant Intercalated Graphene Oxide and Quantitative Determination of the Interlamellar Spacing. Fuller. Nanotub. Carbon Nanostruct. 2014, 23, 196–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Tugarova, A.V.; Mamchenkova, P.V.; Dyatlova, Y.A.; Kamnev, A.A. FTIR and Raman Spectroscopic Studies of Selenium Nanoparticles Synthesised by the Bacterium Azospirillum thiophilum. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2018, 192, 458–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. El-Badri, A.M.; Hashem, A.M.; Batool, M.; Sherif, A.; Nishawy, E.; Ayaad, M.; Hassan, H.M.; Elrewainy, I.M.; Wang, J.; Kuai, J.; et al. Comparative Efficacy of Bio-Selenium Nanoparticles and Sodium Selenite on Morpho-Physiochemical Attributes under Normal and Salt Stress Conditions, besides Selenium Detoxification Pathways in Brassica napus L. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2022, 20, 163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Chen, W.; Cheng, H.; Xia, W. Construction of Polygonatum sibiricum Polysaccharide Functionalized Selenium Nanoparticles for the Enhancement of Stability and Antioxidant Activity. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Kim, C.; Choi, S.; Choi, J.; Seok, H.; Park, K.-O.; Cho, Y.; Park, K.; Jeon, S.; Kim, H.-U.; Kim, T. Development of a Single Particle Sizing System for Monitoring Abrasive Particles in Chemical Mechanical Polishing Process. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 2023, 37, 1317–1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Mohammadi-Jam, S.; Waters, K.E.; Greenwood, R.W. A Review of Zeta Potential Measurements Using Electroacoustics. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 309, 102778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Hassan, R.M.; Elsayed, M.; Kholief, T.E.; Hassanen, N.H.M.; Gafer, J.A.; Attia, Y.A. Mitigating Effect of Single or Combined Administration of Nanoparticles of Zinc Oxide, Chromium Oxide, and Selenium on Genotoxicity and Metabolic Insult in Fructose/Streptozotocin Diabetic Rat Model. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 48517–48534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Yu, S.; Liu, H.; Yang, R.; Zhou, W.; Liu, J. Aggregation and Stability of Selenium Nanoparticles: Complex Roles of Surface Coating, Electrolytes and Natural Organic Matter. J. Environ. Sci. 2023, 130, 14–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Guleria, A.; Baby, C.M.; Tomy, A.; Maurya, D.K.; Neogy, S.; Debnath, A.K.; Adhikari, S. Size Tuning, Phase Stabilization, and Anticancer Efficacy of Amorphous Selenium Nanoparticles: Effect of Ion-Pair Interaction, −OH Functionalization, and Reuse of RTILs as Host Matrix. J. Phys. Chem. C 2021, 125, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Gao, X.; Ren, K.; Zhu, Z.; Zhang, J.; Li, S.; Wang, J.; Xu, Y. Specific Ion Effects: The Role of Anions in the Aggregation of Permanently Charged Clay Mineral Particles. J. Soils Sediments 2023, 23, 263–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Huang, Y.; Su, E.; Ren, J.; Qu, X. The Recent Biological Applications of Selenium-Based Nanomaterials. Nano Today 2021, 38, 101205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Verevkina, M.; Goncharov, V.; Nesmeyanov, E.; Kamalova, O.; Baklanov, I.; Pokhilko, A.; Nagapetova, A.; Miroshnichenko, P. Application of the Se NPs-Chitosan Molecular Complex for the Correction of Selenium Deficiency in Rats Model. Potravin. Slovak J. Food Sci. 2023, 17, 455–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Song, X.; Chen, Y.; Sun, H.; Liu, X.; Leng, X. Physicochemical Stability and Functional Properties of Selenium Nanoparticles Stabilized by Chitosan, Carrageenan, and Gum Arabic. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 255, 117379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Khurana, A.; Tekula, S.; Saifi, M.A.; Venkatesh, P.; Godugu, C. Therapeutic Applications of Selenium Nanoparticles. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2019, 111, 802–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Hu, Y.; Liu, T.; Li, J.; Mai, F.; Li, J.; Chen, Y.; Jing, Y.; Dong, X.; Lin, L.; He, J.; et al. Selenium Nanoparticles as New Strategy to Potentiate Γδ T Cell Anti-Tumor Cytotoxicity through Upregulation of Tubulin-α Acetylation. Biomaterials 2019, 222, 119397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Shi, L.-D.; Xu, Q.-J.; Liu, J.-Y.; Han, Z.-X.; Zhu, Y.-G.; Zhao, H.-P. Will a Non-Antibiotic Metalloid Enhance the Spread of Antibiotic Resistance Genes: The Selenate Story. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 55, 1004–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Tajkarimi, M.; Ibrahim, S.A. Antimicrobial Activity of Ascorbic Acid Alone or in Combination with Lactic Acid on Escherichia Coli O157:H7 in Laboratory Medium and Carrot Juice. Food Control 2011, 22, 801–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Voumard, M.; Breider, F.; von Gunten, U. Effect of Cetyltrimethylammonium Chloride on Various Escherichia Coli Strains and Their Inactivation Kinetics by Ozone and Monochloramine. Water Res. 2022, 216, 118278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Jin, Y.; Deng, J.; Liang, J.; Shan, C.; Tong, M. Efficient Bacteria Capture and Inactivation by Cetyltrimethylammonium Bromide Modified Magnetic Nanoparticles. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2015, 136, 659–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Dong, W.; Green, J.; Korza, G.; Setlow, P. Killing of Spores of Bacillus Species by Cetyltrimethylammonium Bromide. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2019, 126, 1391–1401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Mohammadi, M.; Hafezi, S. Antibacterial Effect of Selenium Hybrid Nanoparticles and Sea Cucumber Extract on E. Coli, Micrococcus luteus and Bacillus cereus. J. Shahid Sadoughi Univ. Med. Sci. 2023, 31, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Alkhathlan, H.; Khan, M.; Khan, S.T.; Khan, M.; Adil, S.F.; Musarrat, J.; Al-Warthan, A.; Siddiqui, M.R.H.; Al-Khedhairy, A.A. Antibacterial Properties of Silver Nanoparticles Synthesized Using Pulicaria glutinosa Plant Extract as a Green Bioreductant. Int. J. Nanomed. 2014, 9, 3551–3565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Prakash, P.; Gnanaprakasam, P.; Emmanuel, R.; Arokiyaraj, S.; Saravanan, M. Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles from Leaf Extract of Mimusops elengi, Linn. for Enhanced Antibacterial Activity against Multi Drug Resistant Clinical Isolates. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2013, 108, 255–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Essa, A.M.M.; Khallaf, M.K. Antimicrobial Potential of Consolidation Polymers Loaded with Biological Copper Nanoparticles. BMC Microbiol. 2016, 16, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Vahdati, M.; Tohidi Moghadam, T. Synthesis and Characterization of Selenium Nanoparticles-Lysozyme Nanohybrid System with Synergistic Antibacterial Properties. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Khudier, M.A.A.; Hammadi, H.A.; Atyia, H.T.; Al-Karagoly, H.; Albukhaty, S.; Sulaiman, G.M.; Dewir, Y.H.; Mahood, H.B. Antibacterial Activity of Green Synthesized Selenium Nanoparticles Using Vaccinium arctostaphylos (L.) Fruit Extract. Cogent Food Agric. 2023, 9, 2245612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Hashem, A.H.; Al-Askar, A.A.; Haponiuk, J.; Abd-Elsalam, K.A.; Hasanin, M.S. Biosynthesis, Characterization, and Antifungal Activity of Novel Trimetallic Copper Oxide–Selenium–Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles against Some Mucorales Fungi. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Salem, M.F.; Abd-Elraoof, W.A.; Tayel, A.A.; Alzuaibr, F.M.; Abonama, O.M. Antifungal Application of Biosynthesized Selenium Nanoparticles with Pomegranate Peels and Nanochitosan as Edible Coatings for Citrus Green Mold Protection. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2022, 20, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Hashem, A.H.; Abdelaziz, A.M.; Askar, A.A.; Fouda, H.M.; Khalil, A.M.A.; Abd-Elsalam, K.A.; Khaleil, M.M. Bacillus megaterium-Mediated Synthesis of Selenium Nanoparticles and Their Antifungal Activity against Rhizoctonia solani in Faba Bean Plants. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Alvi, G.B.; Iqbal, M.S.; Ghaith, M.M.S.; Haseeb, A.; Ahmed, B.; Qadir, M.I. Biogenic Selenium Nanoparticles (SeNPs) from Citrus Fruit Have Anti-Bacterial Activities. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 4811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Islam, S.N.; Naqvi, S.M.A.; Raza, A.; Jaiswal, A.; Singh, A.K.; Dixit, M.; Barnwal, A.; Gambhir, S.; Ahmad, A. Mycosynthesis of Highly Fluorescent Selenium Nanoparticles from Fusarium oxysporum, Their Antifungal Activity against Black Fungus Aspergillus niger, and in-Vivo Biodistribution Studies. 3 Biotech 2022, 12, 309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Jothi, R.; Sangavi, R.; Raja, V.; Kumar, P.; Pandian, S.K.; Gowrishankar, S. Alteration of Cell Membrane Permeability by Cetyltrimethylammonium Chloride Induces Cell Death in Clinically Important Candida Species. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Qiu, Q.; Wu, J.; Quan, Z.; Zhang, H.; Qin, X.; Wang, R.; Yu, J. Electrospun Nanofibers of Polyelectrolyte–Surfactant Complexes for Antibacterial Wound Dressing Application. Soft Matter 2019, 15, 10020–10028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Kliewer, S.; Wicha, S.G.; Bröker, A.; Naundorf, T.; Catmadim, T.; Oellingrath, E.K.; Rohnke, M.; Streit, W.R.; Vollstedt, C.; Kipphardt, H.; et al. Contact-Active Antibacterial Polyethylene Foils via Atmospheric Air Plasma Induced Polymerisation of Quaternary Ammonium Salts. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2020, 186, 110679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Yu, L.; He, T.; Yao, J.; Xu, W.; Peng, S.; Feng, P.; Shuai, C. Cu Ions and Cetyltrimethylammonium Bromide Loaded into Montmorillonite: A Synergistic Antibacterial System for Bone Scaffolds. Mater. Chem. Front. 2022, 6, 103–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Al-hakimi, A.N.; Asnag, G.M.; Alminderej, F.; Alhagri, I.A.; Al-Hazmy, S.M.; Abdallah, E.M. Enhanced Structural, Optical, Electrical Properties and Antibacterial Activity of Selenium Nanoparticles Loaded PVA/CMC Blend for Electrochemical Batteries and Food Packaging Applications. Polym. Test. 2022, 116, 107794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Shakola, T.V.; Rubanik, V.V.; Rubanik, V.V., Jr.; Kurliuk, A.V.; Kirichuk, A.A.; Tskhovrebov, A.G.; Egorov, A.R.; Kritchenkov, A.S. Benzothiazole Derivatives of Chitosan and Their Derived Nanoparticles: Synthesis and In Vitro and In Vivo Antibacterial Effects. Polymers 2023, 15, 3469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Lunkov, A.; Konovalova, M.; Shagdarova, B.; Zhuikova, Y.; Il’ina, A.; Varlamov, V. Synthesis of Selenium Nanoparticles Modified by Quaternary Chitosan Covalently Bonded with Gallic Acid. Polymers 2023, 15, 2123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Niranjan, R.; Zafar, S.; Lochab, B.; Priyadarshini, R. Synthesis and Characterization of Sulfur and Sulfur-Selenium Nanoparticles Loaded on Reduced Graphene Oxide and Their Antibacterial Activity against Gram-Positive Pathogens. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Rangrazi, A.; Bagheri, H.; Ghazvini, K.; Boruziniat, A.; Darroudi, M. Synthesis and Antibacterial Activity of Colloidal Selenium Nanoparticles in Chitosan Solution: A New Antibacterial Agent. Mater. Res. Express 2020, 6, 1250h3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Hou, J.; Tamura, Y.; Lu, H.-Y.; Takahashi, Y.; Kasugai, S.; Nakata, H.; Kuroda, S. An In Vitro Evaluation of Selenium Nanoparticles on Osteoblastic Differentiation and Antimicrobial Properties against Porphyromonas gingivalis. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Boroumand, S.; Safari, M.; Shaabani, E.; Shirzad, M.; Faridi-Majidi, R. Selenium Nanoparticles: Synthesis, Characterization and Study of Their Cytotoxicity, Antioxidant and Antibacterial Activity. Mater. Res. Express 2019, 6, 0850d8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Han, H.-W.; Patel, K.D.; Kwak, J.-H.; Jun, S.-K.; Jang, T.-S.; Lee, S.-H.; Knowles, J.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Lee, H.-H.; Lee, J.-H. Selenium Nanoparticles as Candidates for Antibacterial Substitutes and Supplements against Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Lesnichaya, M.V.; Malysheva, S.F.; Belogorlova, N.A.; Graskova, I.A.; Gazizova, A.V.; Perfilyeva, A.I.; Nozhkina, O.A.; Sukhov, B.G. Synthesis and antimicrobial activity of arabinogalactan-stabilized selenium nanoparticles from sodium bis(2-phenylethyl)diselenophosphinate. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2019, 68, 2245–2251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Lesnichaya, M.; Perfileva, A.; Nozhkina, O.; Gazizova, A.; Graskova, I. Synthesis, toxicity evaluation and determination of possible mechanisms of antimicrobial effect of arabinogalactane-capped selenium nanoparticles. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 2022, 69, 126904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Huang, T.; Holden, J.A.; Heath, D.E.; O’Brien-Simpson, N.M.; O’Connor, A.J. Engineering highly effective antimicrobial selenium nanoparticles through control of particle size. Nanoscale 2019, 11, 14937–14951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Serov, D.A.; Khabatova, V.V.; Vodeneev, V.; Li, R.; Gudkov, S.V. A Review of the Antibacterial, Fungicidal and Antiviral Properties of Selenium Nanoparticles. Materials 2023, 16, 5363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Liang, X.; Zhang, S.; Gadd, G.M.; McGrath, J.; Rooney, D.W.; Zhao, Q. Fungal-derived selenium nanoparticles and their potential applications in electroless silver coatings for preventing pin-tract infections. Regen. Biomater. 2022, 9, rbac013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Sahoo, B.; Leena Panigrahi, L.; Jena, S.; Jha, S.; Arakha, M. Oxidative stress generated due to photocatalytic activity of biosynthesized selenium nanoparticles triggers cytoplasmic leakage leading to bacterial cell death. RSC Adv. 2023, 13, 11406–11414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Al Jahdaly, B.A.; Al-Radadi, N.S.; Eldin, G.M.; Almahri, A.; Ahmed, M.; Shoueir, K.; Janowska, I. Selenium nanoparticles synthesized using an eco-friendly method: Dye decolorization from aqueous solutions, cell viability, antioxidant, and antibacterial effectiveness. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2021, 11, 85–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Pekarkova, J.; Gablech, I.; Fialova, T.; Bilek, O.; Fohlerova, Z. Modifications of Parylene by Microstructures and Selenium Nanoparticles: Evaluation of Bacterial and Mesenchymal Stem Cell Viability. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021, 9, 782799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nanomaterials 13 03128 g001
Figure 1. The schematic diagram of the synthesis of Se NPs-CTAC.
Figure 1. The schematic diagram of the synthesis of Se NPs-CTAC.
Nanomaterials 13 03128 g001
Nanomaterials 13 03128 g002
Figure 2. Histogram of the average hydrodynamic radius distribution of Se NPs (Sample 1).
Figure 2. Histogram of the average hydrodynamic radius distribution of Se NPs (Sample 1).
Nanomaterials 13 03128 g002
Nanomaterials 13 03128 g003
Figure 3. Ternary surface describing the relationship between the average hydrodynamic radius and concentrations of selenious acid and CTAC.
Figure 3. Ternary surface describing the relationship between the average hydrodynamic radius and concentrations of selenious acid and CTAC.
Nanomaterials 13 03128 g003
Nanomaterials 13 03128 g004
Figure 4. Ternary surfaces describing the relationship between the ζ-potential of Se NPs and the concentrations of selenious acid and CTAC (A) with schematic models of negative (B) and positive (C) micelles of Se NPs and TEM micrographs of negative (D) and positive (E) Se NPs sols.
Figure 4. Ternary surfaces describing the relationship between the ζ-potential of Se NPs and the concentrations of selenious acid and CTAC (A) with schematic models of negative (B) and positive (C) micelles of Se NPs and TEM micrographs of negative (D) and positive (E) Se NPs sols.
Nanomaterials 13 03128 g004
Nanomaterials 13 03128 g005
Figure 5. Computer quantum chemical modeling of CTAC molecule and interaction of Se NPs with CTAC molecule: molecular model of CTAC (a), molecular model of Se NPs-CTAC (b), electron density distribution of CTAC (c), electron density distribution of Se NPs-CTAC (d), highest occupied molecular orbital of CTAC (HOMO) (e), highest occupied molecular orbital of Se NPs-CTAC (HOMO) (f), lowest unoccupied molecular orbital of CTAC (LUMO) (g), and lowest unoccupied molecular orbital of Se NPs-CTAC (LUMO) (h).
Figure 5. Computer quantum chemical modeling of CTAC molecule and interaction of Se NPs with CTAC molecule: molecular model of CTAC (a), molecular model of Se NPs-CTAC (b), electron density distribution of CTAC (c), electron density distribution of Se NPs-CTAC (d), highest occupied molecular orbital of CTAC (HOMO) (e), highest occupied molecular orbital of Se NPs-CTAC (HOMO) (f), lowest unoccupied molecular orbital of CTAC (LUMO) (g), and lowest unoccupied molecular orbital of Se NPs-CTAC (LUMO) (h).
Nanomaterials 13 03128 g005
Nanomaterials 13 03128 g006
Figure 6. Spectral characteristics of Se NPs-CTAC: (a) FTIR spectra of CTAC (1) and Se NPs-CTAC (2); (b) absorption spectrum of Se NPs-CTAC.
Figure 6. Spectral characteristics of Se NPs-CTAC: (a) FTIR spectra of CTAC (1) and Se NPs-CTAC (2); (b) absorption spectrum of Se NPs-CTAC.
Nanomaterials 13 03128 g006
Nanomaterials 13 03128 g007
Figure 7. Stability of Se NPs-CTAC at different pH: dependences of the ζ-potential and the average hydrodynamic radius of positive (A) and negative (B) Se NPs sols on pH; appearance of samples of positive (C) and negative (D) Se NPs sols at different pH; schematic models of positive (E) and negative (F) Se NPs sols.
Figure 7. Stability of Se NPs-CTAC at different pH: dependences of the ζ-potential and the average hydrodynamic radius of positive (A) and negative (B) Se NPs sols on pH; appearance of samples of positive (C) and negative (D) Se NPs sols at different pH; schematic models of positive (E) and negative (F) Se NPs sols.
Nanomaterials 13 03128 g007
Nanomaterials 13 03128 g008
Figure 8. Dependence of the average hydrodynamic radius of particles in negative (A) and positive (B) Se NPs sols on the concentration of various ions.
Figure 8. Dependence of the average hydrodynamic radius of particles in negative (A) and positive (B) Se NPs sols on the concentration of various ions.
Nanomaterials 13 03128 g008
Nanomaterials 13 03128 g009
Figure 9. Dependence of the average hydrodynamic radius of particles (R, nm) on the exposure time (τ, day).
Figure 9. Dependence of the average hydrodynamic radius of particles (R, nm) on the exposure time (τ, day).
Nanomaterials 13 03128 g009
Nanomaterials 13 03128 g010
Figure 10. Study of potential antibacterial activity of Se NPs-CTAC by the disk diffusion method: (a)—Micrococcus luteus; (b)—Escherichia coli; A—selenic acid, B—ascorbic acid; C—CTAC; D—Se NPs-CTAC.
Figure 10. Study of potential antibacterial activity of Se NPs-CTAC by the disk diffusion method: (a)—Micrococcus luteus; (b)—Escherichia coli; A—selenic acid, B—ascorbic acid; C—CTAC; D—Se NPs-CTAC.
Nanomaterials 13 03128 g010
Nanomaterials 13 03128 g011
Figure 11. The scheme of action of CTAC, Se NPs and Se NPs-CTAC on microbial cell.
Figure 11. The scheme of action of CTAC, Se NPs and Se NPs-CTAC on microbial cell.
Nanomaterials 13 03128 g011
Table 1. Variation levels of parameters and matrix of the experiment.
Table 1. Variation levels of parameters and matrix of the experiment.
Sample Num.C (H2SeO3) (mg/mL)C (CTAC) (mg/mL)C (Ascorbic Acid) (mg/mL)
10.480.615.83
20.484.8646.6
30.4838.89372.8
43.80.6146.6
53.84.86372.8
63.838.895.83
730.40.61372.8
830.44.865.83
930.438.8946.6
Table 2. Samples for the study of potential antimicrobial properties.
Table 2. Samples for the study of potential antimicrobial properties.
SampleConcentration, mmol/L
12345
Selenious acid43.93004.39300.43930.04390.0044
Ascorbic acid43.75004.37500.43750.04380.0044
CTAC832.210083.22108.32200.83200.0832
Se NPs-CTAC19.39001.93900.19400.01940.0019
Table 3. Average hydrodynamic radii of Se NPs.
Table 3. Average hydrodynamic radii of Se NPs.
Sample Num.ζ-Potential (mV)rav (nm)
128.0421 ± 4
236.4921 ± 2
3−106.23113 ± 15
452.3221 ± 2
516.2164 ± 4
6−76.2027 ± 3
715.6828 ± 2
811.3821 ± 3
9−1.7225 ± 3
rav—average hydrodynamic radius (n ± PDI).
Table 4. Numerical values of the parameters of computer quantum chemical modeling.
Table 4. Numerical values of the parameters of computer quantum chemical modeling.
SubstanceBondEHOMOLUMOη
CTAC-−803.9040.0220.0840.031
Se−12,795.691−0.005−0.0000.003
Se-−11,991.801−0.141−0.0420.050
Table 5. Potential antimicrobial activity of the precursor, stabilizer, reducing agent, and Se NPs-CTAC.
Table 5. Potential antimicrobial activity of the precursor, stabilizer, reducing agent, and Se NPs-CTAC.
PreparationSampleConcentration, mmol/LCFU, ×103 in 1 mL
Escherichia coliMicrococcus luteusMucor
Ascorbic acid143.75000.26 ± 0.030.24 ± 0.050.11 ± 0.02
24.37500.23 ± 0.040.26 ± 0.020.12 ± 0.02
30.43750.23 ± 0.030.23 ± 0.040.11 ± 0.01
40.04380.25 ± 0.020.26 ± 0.030.14 ± 0.01
50.00440.27 ± 0.020.25 ± 0.030.13 ± 0.02
Selenic acid143.93000.24 ± 0.030.25 ± 0.020.12 ± 0.03
24.39300.25 ± 0.040.23 ± 0.050.13 ± 0.01
30.43930.25 ± 0.020.22 ± 0.040.11 ± 0.02
40.04390.24 ± 0.040.24 ± 0.050.12 ± 0.02
50.00440.26 ± 0.020.27 ± 0.020.13 ± 0.01
CTAC1832.2100000
283.2210000
38.3220000.02 ± 0.01
40.83200.08 ± 0.030.03 ± 0.010.02 ± 0.01
50.08320.11 ± 0.010.04 ± 0.010.05 ± 0.02
Se NPs-CTAC119.3900000
21.9390000
30.1940000
40.01940.03 ± 0.0100.02 ± 0.01
50.00190.04 ± 0.010.03 ± 0.010.03 ± 0.01
Table 6. Potential antibacterial activity of Se NPs-CTAC.
Table 6. Potential antibacterial activity of Se NPs-CTAC.
PreparationSampleConcentration, mmol/LInhibition Zone, mm
Escherichia coliMicrococcus luteus
Ascorbic acid143.750000
24.375000
30.437500
40.043800
50.004400
Selenic acid143.930000
24.393000
30.439300
40.043900
50.004400
CTAC1832.210026 ± 331 ± 4
283.221017 ± 420 ± 2
38.322012 ± 217 ± 4
40.832000
50.083200
Se NPs-CTAC119.390033 ± 231 ± 3
21.939021 ± 526 ± 2
30.194015 ± 222 ± 3
40.019411 ± 220 ± 2
50.001912 ± 418 ± 1
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Blinova, A.; Blinov, A.; Kravtsov, A.; Nagdalian, A.; Rekhman, Z.; Gvozdenko, A.; Kolodkin, M.; Filippov, D.; Askerova, A.; Golik, A.; et al. Synthesis, Characterization and Potential Antimicrobial Activity of Selenium Nanoparticles Stabilized with Cetyltrimethylammonium Chloride. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 3128. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13243128

AMA Style

Blinova A, Blinov A, Kravtsov A, Nagdalian A, Rekhman Z, Gvozdenko A, Kolodkin M, Filippov D, Askerova A, Golik A, et al. Synthesis, Characterization and Potential Antimicrobial Activity of Selenium Nanoparticles Stabilized with Cetyltrimethylammonium Chloride. Nanomaterials. 2023; 13(24):3128. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13243128

Chicago/Turabian Style

Blinova, Anastasiya, Andrey Blinov, Alexander Kravtsov, Andrey Nagdalian, Zafar Rekhman, Alexey Gvozdenko, Maksim Kolodkin, Dionis Filippov, Alina Askerova, Alexey Golik, and et al. 2023. "Synthesis, Characterization and Potential Antimicrobial Activity of Selenium Nanoparticles Stabilized with Cetyltrimethylammonium Chloride" Nanomaterials 13, no. 24: 3128. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13243128

APA Style

Blinova, A., Blinov, A., Kravtsov, A., Nagdalian, A., Rekhman, Z., Gvozdenko, A., Kolodkin, M., Filippov, D., Askerova, A., Golik, A., Serov, A., Shariati, M. A., Alharbi, N. S., Kadaikunnan, S., & Thiruvengadam, M. (2023). Synthesis, Characterization and Potential Antimicrobial Activity of Selenium Nanoparticles Stabilized with Cetyltrimethylammonium Chloride. Nanomaterials, 13(24), 3128. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13243128

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop