Next Article in Journal
Comparative Study of Thermal and Plasma-Enhanced Atomic Layer Deposition of Iron Oxide Using Bis(N,N′-di-butylacetamidinato)iron(II)
Next Article in Special Issue
Adverse Effect of Metallic Gold and Silver Nanoparticles on Xenopus laevis Embryogenesis
Previous Article in Journal
On the Origin of Raman Activity in Anatase TiO2 (Nano)Materials: An Ab Initio Investigation of Surface and Size Effects
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Milk Protein Adsorption on Metallic Iron Surfaces

Nanomaterials 2023, 13(12), 1857; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13121857
by Parinaz Mosaddeghi Amini, Julia Subbotina * and Vladimir Lobaskin *
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Nanomaterials 2023, 13(12), 1857; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13121857
Submission received: 18 May 2023 / Revised: 9 June 2023 / Accepted: 11 June 2023 / Published: 14 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Metal Nanoparticles and Nanotoxicity)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript titled "Multiscale modeling of milk protein adsorption on metallic iron surfaces" by Parinaz Mosaddegi Amini et al. presents the findings of a study that employed a multiscale approach, integrating all-atom and coarse-grained simulations, to generate 3D protein structures. By examining adsorption energies, the authors make predictions about the composition of the protein corona on iron nanoparticles and flat surfaces using a competitive adsorption model. The paper reports interesting and well discussed results. However, there are some errors in the manuscript which need to be rectified before the acceptance of the paper. Some suggestions are provided below to improve the manuscript quality.

 In the Results section of the manuscript, although there are explanations for Figures 4 and 6, they are not marked with the corresponding sections of text. Please provide the appropriate annotations for these figures.

 What is the pH value set in the simulation of protein-nanoparticle interactions?

 Table 3: Revise “BS” to “BC”.

Author Response

We thank the reviewer for supporting our paper. We have implemented the suggestions and highlighted them in the revised manuscript.

Reviewer 2 Report

Just accept. The paper is very sound technically and is relevant practically. Possibly such a review (extremely rare from my side) results from a contrast with everything else (of poor quality) that I read this morning, but I do not see any substantial issues.

english is acceptable

Author Response

We thank the reviewer for the support.

Back to TopTop