Next Article in Journal
MoO3@MoS2 Core-Shell Structured Hybrid Anode Materials for Lithium-Ion Batteries
Next Article in Special Issue
Steam Activation of Acid-Chars for Enhanced Textural Properties and Pharmaceuticals Removal
Previous Article in Journal
Substrate-Modulated Electric and Magnetic Resonances of Lithium Niobite Nanoparticles Illuminated by White Light
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Effect of Agglomeration on Arsenic Adsorption Using Iron Oxide Nanoparticles
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 12
Issue 12
10.3390/nano12122011
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Unique Interaction between Layered Black Phosphorus and Nitrogen Dioxide

by
Jingjing Zhao
1,2,
Xuejiao Zhang
1,
Qing Zhao
1,3,4,
Xue-Feng Yu
5,
Siyu Zhang
1,* and
Baoshan Xing
6
1
Key Laboratory of Pollution Ecology and Environmental Engineering, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China
2
Shenyang Institute of Applied Ecology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
3
Key Laboratory of Integrated Agro-Environmental Pollution Control and Management, Institute of Eco-Environmental and Soil Sciences, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, China
4
China National-Regional Joint Engineering Research Center for Soil Pollution Control and Remediation in South China, Guangzhou 510650, China
5
Materials and Interfaces Center, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen 518055, China
6
Stockbridge School of Agriculture, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2022, 12(12), 2011; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12122011
Submission received: 18 April 2022 / Revised: 1 June 2022 / Accepted: 6 June 2022 / Published: 10 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Nanomaterials for Adsorption Purposes)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Air pollution caused by acid gases (NO2, SO2) or greenhouse gases (CO2) is an urgent environmental problem. Two-dimensional nanomaterials exhibit exciting application potential in air pollution control, among which layered black phosphorus (LBP) has superior performance and is environmentally friendly. However, the current interaction mechanism of LBP with hazardous gases is contradictory to experimental observations, largely impeding development of LBP-based air pollution control nanotechnologies. Here, interaction mechanisms between LBP and hazardous gases are unveiled based on density functional theory and experiments. Results show that NO2 is different from other gases, as it can react with unsaturated defects of LBP, resulting in oxidation of LBP and reduction of NO2. Computational results indicate that the redox is initiated by p orbital hybridization between one oxygen atom of NO2 and the phosphorus atom carrying a dangling single electron in a defect’s center. For NO, the interaction mechanism is chemisorption on unsaturated LBP defects, whereas for SO2, NH3, CO2 or CO, the interaction is dominated by van der Waals forces (57–82% of the total interaction). Experiments confirmed that NO2 can oxidize LBP, yet other gases such as CO2 cannot. This study provides mechanistic understanding in advance for developing novel nanotechnologies for selectively monitoring or treating gas pollutants containing NO2.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Hazardous gases emitted from industries, traffic and other causes cause a series of climate, environmental and health problems, including global warming, acid rain and photochemical smog [1,2,3]. According to International Energy Agency’s report in 2016, 6.5 million premature deaths can be attributed to air pollution worldwide annually [4]. Exposure during pregnancy and early postnatal periods to nitrogen dioxide (NO2) or sulfur dioxide (SO2) is associated with childhood allergy diseases [5]. Adsorbents are increasingly used in eliminating hazardous gases, such as molecular sieves [6], porous carbon [7], metallic clusters [8], graphene [9] and MXenes [10]. Two-dimensional (2D) nanomaterials have great advantages in gas adsorption over other materials, owing to quantum size effects, large surface areas, excellent electronic/photoelectronic performance, etc. [11,12]. A comprehensive understanding of the interaction mechanisms between nanomaterials and hazardous gases would be beneficial to developing efficient and selective nanotechnology for prevention and control of air pollution.
Layered black phosphorus (LBP) is a newly popular 2D nanomaterial [13]. Its large specific surface area (2400 m2/g [14]) offers plenty of interaction sites for hazardous gas molecules. Recent studies indicate LBP is a nanomaterial superior to graphene or molybdenum disulfide as a gas sensor for detecting a variety of hazardous gases [15,16]. LBP is attractive due to inherent biocompatibility [17], and was found to be nontoxic to L-929 fibroblasts at concentrations lower than 4 μg mL−1 [18]. As a degradable nanomaterial, the decomposition of LBP mainly produces low-toxicity phosphate, phosphite, etc. [19] Therefore, LBP has a controllable environmental risk and is suitable for the development of sustainable nanotechnology for monitoring or eliminating hazardous gas pollutants. It is necessary to understand the interaction mechanism of hazardous gases with LBP.
Compared to other gasses LBP has the highest sensitivity, superior selectivity and a short response time toward NO2 [20,21]. As low as 5 ppb of NO2 can induce a clear conductance change in an LBP sensor [16]. A similar response cannot be obtained for carbon monoxide (CO), carbon dioxide (CO2) or ammonia (NH3) until the concentrations increase to 1 × 102, 1 × 104 and 10 ppm, respectively [22]. An LBP sensor demonstrated a low limit of detection of 0.4 ppb toward NO2 under N2 and air conditions [23]. Recent studies show that incomplete recovery of an LBP sensor is remarkable after exposure to 50 ppb NO2 [24,25]. The high sensitivity/selectivity and poor reversibility of LBP sensors imply that the interaction of LBP with NO2 is undoubtedly stronger than those with other gases.
The adsorption energies (Ead) of NO2 (−0.41 to −0.27 eV [15,26]) and nitrogen monoxide (NO) (−0.26 to −0.18 eV [26,27]) on a perfect LBP are fairly similar to those of other hazardous gases, including CO2, CO and SO2 (−0.55 to –0.12 eV [28,29,30]), based on the generalized gradient approximation with the parameterization of Perdew−Burke−Ernzerhof (GGA-PBE) computation methods. As for favorable adsorption configurations, no consensus has been achieved by different computational studies for NO2 [15,31] and for SO2 [32,33,34]. Accordingly, computational studies so far suggest that NO2 is not remarkably different from other gases in terms of interacting with LBP.
The inconsistency between experimental results and theoretical computations impedes the development of LBP-based nanotechnology in the field of air pollution control. To break through the knowledge barrier, understanding the interaction mechanisms of LBP with various hazardous gases is necessary. First, NO2 or NO has an odd number of valence electrons [35,36] (Figure S1), and therefore is inferred to act more actively while interacting with nanomaterials than gas pollutants owning even numbers of valence electrons [37,38]. In addition, various defects, including Stone–Wales (SW), and single and double vacancy (SV and DV), are inevitably formed during the fabrication of LBP [39]. Due to loss of neighboring atoms, atoms in the vacancy are unsaturated, and easily form free radicals carrying single electrons [40]. Previous studies show that SV defects of LBP significantly improve adsorption of phosphine and arsine [41]. Vacancy defects can significantly promote binding energies between blue phosphorene and volatile organic compounds [42]. Accordingly, we guess that unsaturated defects carrying dangling single electrons in LBP are responsible for the distinct interaction with NO2.
In this study, the interaction mechanisms of LBP and common hazardous gases are unveiled based on density functional theoretical (DFT) computations and experiments. NO2, NO, NH3, SO2, CO2 and CO were selected as representative hazardous gas pollutants, as they possess different outer sphere electronic structures (Figure S1). Two hypotheses, associated with the electronic structures of gas molecules and defective properties of LBP, respectively, were tested to probe the interaction mechanism between NO2 and LBP. The results provide new insights on the interaction mechanisms of LBP with hazardous gas pollutants and are beneficial to developing sustainable nanomaterials for air pollution prevention and control.

2. Computational Methods

2.1. Adsorbent Model

A 3 × 1 × 3 supercell containing 36 phosphorus atoms (P1–P36) was constructed to simulate perfect SLBP. Each P atom of SLBP is covalently bonded to three adjoining P atoms, forming a wrinkled honeycomb structure (Figure S2). This wrinkled honeycomb structure lets SLBP contain two atomic layers, each including 50% of the atoms. The size of the periodic box was a = 9.845 Å, b = 17.097 Å and c = 13.972 Å along zigzag, vertical and armchair directions, respectively. The vacuum region in the vertical (b) direction was set to be 15 Å to avoid interactions of gas molecule with SLBP in the adjacent periodic box. Similar box size was used for simulating the LBP-based gas sensor [31]. Defective SLBP (d-SLBP) was constructed on the basis of optimized geometry of SLBP. The initial configurations of SLBP and d-SLBP are shown in Text S1. Additional information is included in the Support Information (Figures S1–S27, Table S1–S4, Text S1–S10). Two in-plane SW1 and SW2 [39,43] defects were built by rotating a vertical bond P18–P20 or a horizontal bond P17–P18 by 90°. SV and DV1-DV3 defects were built by deleting phosphorus atoms. Theoretically, deleting one phosphorus atom creates three neighboring unsaturated phosphorus atoms, each carrying one dangling unpaired electron. SV was constructed by removing atom P18. DV1 and DV2 were built by removing two bonded phosphorus atoms, P18–P20 and P17–P18, respectively. DV3 was obtained by removing two separate atoms, P18 and P29. Edge defects in either zigzag (EGz1 and EGz2) or armchair (EGa1 and EGa2) direction were constructed, considering the anisotropy of LBP [44]. The periodic box was enlarged in the armchair (c) or the zigzag (a) direction to 20 Å for creating edge defects. Box enlargement inevitably results in unsaturated phosphorus atoms on edges. By saturating phosphorus atoms on one edge with hydrogen atoms, EGz1 and EGa1 were built. By deleting one phosphorus atom from EGz1 (P31) or EGa1 (P21), EGz2 or EGa2 was constructed. Fully optimized geometries of SLBP and d-SLBP are shown in Figure 1.

2.2. Adsorption Complex Models

Generally, there are three widely accepted adsorption sites in LBP, including top, bridge and hollow types [29]. In this study, the three adsorption sites were further differentiated between SLBP and d-SLBP to be three top (T, T1, T2), 4 bridge (B, B1–B3) and 5 hollow (H, H1–H4) sites (Figure 1). Gas molecules were placed at one of these sites as initials. Due to the influences of spatial structures, the adsorption site for gas molecules in the fully relaxed configuration of the adsorption complex was classified according to the closest type. Different initial distances (ca. 2.14 to 4.15 Å) between gas molecule and SLBP or d-SLBP were tested in the computation. No direct bindings between gas molecules and any phosphorus atoms existed in initial configurations.
Orientations of gas molecules were comprehensively considered in the computations, as previous computational results for orientations of gas molecules adsorbed on LBP were obscure [15,31,32,33,34,39]. For nonlinear molecules (NO2, SO2, NH3), vertical orientations, including single atom pointing (i.e., 1Ov, Nv, Sv, 1Hv) or multiple atoms pointing (2Ov, 3Hv) to SLBP plane, and parallel orientations (p), were included. For linear molecules (CO2, NO, CO), vertical single atom pointing (Ov, Cv, Nv) and parallel (p) orientations were calculated. Considering the anisotropy of LBP, orientations were further differentiated to be along zigzag (z) or armchair (a) directions. Taking 2Ovz as an example, it represents a configuration where two oxygen atoms of a dioxide point to the SLBP plane, and the orientation of the dioxide is along the zigzag direction. The initial configurations of gases with different orientations on SLBP are shown in Text S1.

2.3. Computational Methods

All computations were performed with a CASTEP program in the Material Studio (Biovia, San Diego, CA) software [45]. The GGA-PBE [46] rather than LDA (Local Density Approximation) [47] was used to describe exchange-correlation functional, as LDA was regarded to usually underestimate bonding distance and overestimate binding energy. In addition, van der Waals (vdW) correction was performed within the empirical correction scheme of Grimme [48] method. The Brillouin zone was sampled using a 4 × 1 × 3 Monkhorst-Pack k-point grid. The Kinetic energy cutoff of 500 eV was used in geometry optimization process. Convergence tests for energy and k-point are shown in Text S2. Initial configurations were fully optimized until the force on each atom was less than 0.05 eV/Å and the energy tolerance was less than 1 × 10−5 eV/atom. Spin polarization was included for computing NO, NO2 or unsaturated d-SLBP (SV, DV1, DV3 and edge defects). Band structure and Mulliken population were analyzed based on fully optimized geometries. A large k-point (10 × 1 × 8) was used to achieve high accuracy in density of states (DOS) computations. The calculation methods of adsorption energies including (Ead) and not including (E0) vdW interaction energy (EvdW) corrections and deformation energies (Edef) of d-SLBP after adsorbing gas molecules are described in Text S2.

2.4. Experimental Methods

LBP was prepared by the liquid exfoliation method described in a previous study [19]. Firstly, the bulk black phosphorus was ground into powders with an agate mortar, and transferred into oxygen-free Millipore ultrapure water in the glovebox. Then, the powders were sonicated with a probe for 12 h. The LBP suspension was transferred to centrifuge tubes in a glovebox, and then centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 30 min. The supernatant was transferred to the glovebox and filtered through a 0.22 μm cellulose membrane to collect LBP. After drying overnight in the glovebox, the LBP was transferred into three anaerobic bottles. Two of the bottles were continuously pumped with NO2 (200 ppm NO2 in N2, Beijing Lvyuan Dade Biological Tech Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) and CO2 (>99.5%, Shenyang Shuntai Special Gas Co., Ltd., Shenyang, China) at a flow rate of 10 mL/min for 3 h. Then, the two bottles were sealed, allowing thorough interaction of LBP with the gases. After 24 h, each of the two bottles was injected with pure N2 for 1 h to remove excess NO2 or CO2. LBP in the third bottle was filled with pure N2 (>99.99%, Shenyang Shuntai Special Gas Co., Ltd.) for 3 h and placed in the glovebox for over 24 h. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, ESCALAB250, Thermo VG, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to identify phosphorus components of LBP after treatment with N2, NO2 or CO2.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Adsorption of Gas Molecules on Perfect LBP

A perfect single-layer LBP (SLBP) contained in a periodic box was used in computations (Figure 1a). Initial configurations of adsorption complexes were constructed by varying orientation, adsorption sites or distances of gas molecules on the plane of SLBP, in order to solve the inconsistencies in Ead values and in favorable adsorption configurations among previous computational studies. By comprehensively screening hundreds of adsorption configurations, the most stable adsorption configuration (adsorption complexes possessing the most negative Ead values) of each gas molecule was obtained (Figures S3–S5). Computational results indicate that orientations, together with distances of gas molecule toward the LBP plane, in the initially constructed adsorption configurations were key factors influencing the computational results on favorable adsorption configurations and Ead (Text S3). These two factors were the primary reasons for contrary computational results in previous studies [15,31,32,33,34,37] (Text S4). In comparison with initial orientations of gas molecules, impacts of initial adsorption sites on favorable configurations or Ead are not remarkable.
According to Ead values (Table 1), the two oxygen atoms in pointing adsorption configuration (Ead = −0.225 eV, Figure S5a) are more stable than the nitrogen atom in pointing configuration (Ead = −0.211, −0.202 eV, (Figure S5b,c) in NO2. This is different from the adsorption of NO2 on other 2D nanomaterials, such as graphene or indium nitride, where NO2 is bound to the sheet’s surface with the nitrogen end [49]. In the case of SO2, two oxygen atoms in pointing configuration are less favorable (Figure S5d–f). Parallel and sulfur atom pointing configurations showing comparatively the lowest Ead values (−0.310, −0.309 eV) are the most favorable adsorption configurations for SO2 (Figure S5d,e). Three linear molecules, CO2, NO and CO, prefer parallel configurations, as indicated by Ead values. In the most stable adsorption configurations, CO2 is almost completely parallel to the SLBP plane with a negligible dihedral angle (Figure S5g), whereas for NO or CO, the dihedral angle to the SLBP plane is 9–17° (Figure S5h–j). This small dihedral angle is mainly attributed to the asymmetry of monoxide molecules. Differently from NO2, the nitrogen atom pointing configuration is the most stable configuration for NH3 (Figure S5k).
The small Ead values (−0.310 to –0.138 eV), low charge transfer amounts (−0.15 to 0.04 e) and large distances to the SLBP plane (2.47–3.44 Å) indicate weak interaction between gas molecules and SLBP (Table 1). The distance of the N atom in NO to SLBP (2.47 Å) is the shortest in the most stable adsorption configurations of the six gas molecules, but is still much longer than a P–N covalent bond length (1.89 Å [50,51]). The adsorption of gas molecules on perfect SLBP plane is dominated by vdW forces, as indicated by the ratio of 57–82% relative to Ead.
Based on the first guess, adsorption of NO2 and NO carrying odd numbers of valence electrons on LBP should be stronger than that of other gas molecules. However, the Ead value of SO2 is the largest among all gas molecules. The computed Ead value of NH3 is between that of NO and NO2. This is not in accordance with the first guess or experimental results, which indicate that the sensitivity of LBP sensors toward NH3 (10 ppm) is about 3–5 orders of magnitude lower than that toward NO2 (0.4–20 ppb) in a dry environment [16,22,23]. Accordingly, there must be other mechanisms responsible to the distinct interaction between LBP and NO2.

3.2. Adsorption of Gas Molecules on Defects in LBP

A variety of in-plane and edge defective SLBP (d-SLBP) models were built. Optimized geometries of d-SLBP and computed formation energies can be found in Figure 1b–k and Text S5. Dioxides (NO2, SO2 or CO2) were selected in the computations to investigate the role of the outmost valence shell of gases while interacting with d-SLBP.
Ead values computed for adsorption of dioxides on all defective adsorption sites of each d-SLBP are shown in Figure 2a–c. By comparing Ead values of the most stable adsorption configurations of NO2 on each d-SLBP (Figure 2d and Text S6), we found that four among ten d-SLBP, including SV, DV3, EGz1 and EGa2, exhibit large Ead values (−2.584 to –1.304 eV). This means that strong chemisorption is formed. In the most stable adsorption configurations of the four d-SLBP, a new P–O bond, 1.56–1.64 Å in length, is formed between NO2 and a phosphorus atom in a defect center (Figure 2e). This distance is close to or falls within the range of length of P–O single bond (1.593 [52]–1.75 [53] Å) suggested for LBP. As a result, one O atom is pulled out from NO2, leaving a part containing one N atom and one O atom ([NO]). To know the nature of [NO], it was pulled away from the main part of d-SLBP, taking SV as an example to construct a desorption system by preventing any interaction between the two parts. Total charge and total spin population distributed on [NO] were 0 and 1 (Text S7), respectively. In other words, NO was formed during the interaction of the 4 d-SLBP and NO2. After separating from [NO], the newly formed P–O in d-SLBP was shortened to 1.52 Å, which is close to the length of a P=O double bond (1.445–1.502 Å [52]).
Interestingly, in comparison with SV, EGz1 or EGa2 (Ead = −1.543 to –1.304 eV), DV3 possess a larger Ead value (−2.584 eV), not only interacting with NO2, but also with SO2 or CO2 (Ead = −1.378 to –1.211 eV), as shown in Figure 2d. However, no new bonds are formed between DV3 and SO2 or CO2 (dshortest = 2.89–3.66 Å), indicating the negative Ead values are unusually large. This is because non-negligible deformation happens to DV3 while interacting with dioxides, resulting in inauthentic interaction energies. To obtain real interaction energies between dioxides and d-SLBP, deformation energies (Edef) were computed for each d-SLBP (Text S8). Taking NO2 as an example, the Edef values of DV3 (−0.718 eV) are higher than those of other d-SLBP (−0.013 to −0.254 eV), implying that the deformation of other d-SLBP is slight. After deducting Edef from Ead, the modified interaction energy (Ead-def) of NO2 and DV3 is −1.866 eV, which is comparable to those of SV, EGz1 and EGa2 (−1.543 to –1.304 eV) (Figure S6). Accordingly, the four d-SLBP show similar interaction strengths with NO2 and significantly improve the adsorption of NO2 compared with SLBP. The Ead-def values of SO2 and CO2 interacting with DV3 are −0.304 and −0.137 eV, respectively, comparable to those computed for interacting with SLBP (Figure S6). Therefore, d-SLBP enhances only the interaction of LBP with NO2, but not with SO2 or CO2.

3.3. Interaction Mechanisms of Defective LBP and Gas Molecules

To probe interaction mechanisms between NO2 and d-SLBP, spin density distributions of d-SLBP were mapped (Figure 3). Spin density can explain the distribution of unpaired electrons or single electrons in space [54]. The results show that SV, DV3, EGz1 and EGa2 possess non-zero spin density, meaning that each of the four d-SLBP has unsaturated phosphorus atoms carrying unpaired dangling single electrons. This is caused by losing one or more neighbor P atoms. Accordingly, the unpaired electron of d-SLBP is inferred to be closely related to the unique interaction with NO2.
Taking SV as an example, there were three unsaturated atoms, P13, P17 and P20, in the initially constructed geometry due to loss of P18. After geometry optimization, a new bond P13–P20, 2.37 Å in length was formed, leaving one dangling atom, P17, in SV (Figure 1d). Most of the spin density (0.64) is distributed around atom P17 in SV (Figure 3c), indicating the dangling single electron mainly presents around atom P17. According to Ead values, the most stable adsorption configuration of NO2 on the top of SV is that in which NO2 binds with atom P17 (Figure 2e). For the other three d-SLBP, the most stable adsorption configuration of NO2 also uses the phosphorus atoms carrying the highest non-zero spin density (Text S6). Unsaturated carbons in defected graphene were found to be active toward NO2 molecules [55]. Therefore, the results indicate that the unique interaction with NO2 is attributable to unpaired single electron carried by the four d-SLBP.
Although interacting with d-SLBP carrying dangling single electrons, the adsorption of SO2 or CO2 is not enhanced, as indicated by the Ead-def values (Figure S6). This means that the electron properties of gas molecules are another key factor governing interaction strengths between LBP and gases. To further prove this inference, interactions of the four unsaturated d-SLBP with NO and NH3 were computed. Similarly to NO2, NO has an odd number of outmost valence electrons. NH3 has an even number of outmost valence electrons, and every two of them are paired.
The Ead-def values (Figure 4a) between NO and SV, DV3 or EGa2 are almost as large as that of NO2. The Ead-def values between NO and EGz1 are a little lower, but still more negative than that between NO and SLBP. In the most stable adsorption configurations of the adsorption complex of each d-SLBP, the N atom of NO is near d-SLBP at a distance of 1.78–1.98 Å (Figure 4b). This distance is close to (in the case of SV, DV3, EGa2) or slightly larger (in the case of EGz1) than the length of a typical P–N single bond (commonly accepted value is 1.89 Å [50,51]), but much smaller than the distance (2.47 Å) between NO and SLBP (Table 1), which implies that there is a strong chemisorption between NO and unsaturated d-SLBP. The difference is that d-SLBP binds NO by forming a weak P–N bond but reacts with NO2 by abstracting one O atom in redox reactions. The original bond of NO (1.16 Å) was weakened but not broken (1.20 Å) by d-SLBP, but one N=O bond of NO2 was broken due to reaction with d-SLBP. The Ead-def values or distances of NH3 interacting with unsaturated d-SLBP are comparable to those of NH3 interacting with SLBP (Figure 4a and Figure S7). This confirms that the outmost valence electron characteristics of gas molecules are responsible for strong interactions with LBP.
The above computational results show that NO2 can oxidize unsaturated LBP defects to produce oxidized phosphorus and NO. This redox mechanism has never been reported for NO2 and other two-dimensional nanomaterials as far as we know. Previous studies showed that vacancy defects in graphene [56] or tungsten trioxide [57] can improve the adsorption of NO2, but did not explain the reason. Yan et al. [42] showed that unsaturated carbon atoms in carbon vacancy defects of graphene can bind the nitrogen atom of NO2. Carbon vacancies produced chemisorption sites on graphene for NO2 [58]. Therefore, the enhanced adsorption of NO2 on graphene is most likely due to strong chemisorption similar to that of NO and unsaturated LBP defects, but not a redox reaction.

3.4. Orbital Analysis on the Nature of Interaction

Total density of states (TDOS) and partial density of states (PDOS) were computed to further understand interaction mechanism of NO2 with LBP (Text S9). Taking SLBP and SW1 as examples of saturated LBP, new impurity states that emerged in conduction bands (CB) of the adsorption complexes at around 2 eV were mainly contributed by p orbitals of O and N atoms, and those in valence bands (VB) at −4 to –2 eV were contributed by p orbitals of O atoms (Figure 5a,b). Slight p orbital hybridization of O, N and P atoms near the Fermi level can explain the small amount of charge transfer (−0.11 e, −0.14 e) between NO2 and neighboring P atoms (Table 1). Since there is no single electron that can interact with these NO2 in SLBP and SW1, the whole system exhibits spin asymmetry, which is mainly derived from the nitrogen and oxygen of NO2.
Taking SV as an example of unsaturated LBP, an individual SV owns an odd number of single electrons, as shown by asymmetric TDOS (Text S9). As NO2 carries an odd number of valence electrons, the total number of valence electrons of adsorption complexes formed by SV and NO2 is even. However, the results show that the complex has a spin asymmetric TDOS (Figure 5c), indicating that electrons are unpaired. This is a cue for the presence of single-electron species in the complex of NO2 and SV, i.e., [NO] (a NO molecule) carrying an unpaired valence electron. Significant orbital overlaps indicting strong hybridization between p orbitals of O and P17 was observed, indicating formation of a P–O bond. Similar results were observed for other d-SLBP; see Text S9 for detailed discussion.
Large and continuous orbital overlaps were also observed for adsorption complexes of NO and unsaturated d-SLBP (Figure S8), but not for those with SO2 or CO2 (Text S9). This explains how NO can form strong chemisorption with d-SLBP, but SO2 or CO2 cannot. The orbital overlap of NO with in-plane vacancy defects (SV and DV3) is stronger than that with edge defects (EGa2 and EGz1), in accordance with the order of the Ead values (DV3 > SV > EGa2 > EGz1). Differently from NO2, TDOS of the adsorption complex of NO and SV is spin symmetric (Figure S8), indicating that all electrons are paired. As both individual NO and individual SV have unpaired electrons, the spin symmetry of adsorption complex is a clear clue for the formation of a P–N=O moiety (Figure S7a).

3.5. Experimental Verification of Oxidation of LBP by NO2

According to the computational results, the unique interaction between NO2 and LBP is redox in nature, as the unsaturated defect in LBP is oxidized and NO2 is reduced. To verify that LBP interacts with NO2 differently from other gas pollutants, experiments were performed. LBP was prepared following the method described in Text S10. As defects are inevitably formed during the exfoliation of LBP in water, the as-prepared LBP was exposed to NO2 in order to check whether oxidation can occur. As a comparison, the as-prepared LBP was exposed to CO2, which has no unpaired valence electrons and interacts with LBP mainly through van der Waals interactions based on our computational results. LBP exposed to N2 was used as a blank control to show the oxidation status of the original LBP.
After 24 h of exposure, LBP nanoflakes were characterized by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Characteristic peaks corresponding to P 2p1/2 and P 2p3/2 [59] were observed at 130.4 and 129.6 eV. No oxidation peaks were found when BP was exposed to N2 (Figure 6a) or CO2 (Figure 6b). However, after exposure to NO2, a noticeable peak emerged slightly above 133 eV (Figure 6c), corresponding to oxidized phosphorus (POx) [60]. The POx peak around 133 eV accounts for 23.3% of total phosphorus contents in LBP. This confirms that LBP can be rapidly oxidized by NO2. The POx peak (if there is any) in Figure 6b is as negligible at that in Figure 6a, indicating that direct interaction between oxygen atoms of CO2 with LBP is negligible. These experimental results give solid evidence supporting the computational conclusion that NO2 can oxidize LBP, whereas CO2, being without an unpaired single electron, cannot.

4. Conclusions

In summary, an interaction mechanism of LBP with common gas pollutants was unveiled in this study. LBP can react with NO2 following a redox mechanism, which is essentially different from the physisorption of SO2, NH3, CO2 and CO, or chemisorption of NO. The adsorption mechanism of gas molecules on LBP was first clarified. The unique interaction with NO2 is owed to unsaturated phosphorus carrying a single electron in LBP. This mechanism not only solves the problems puzzling experimental studies on LBP-based gas sensors, but also provides ideas for the development of environmentally friendly nanotechnology based on LBP to monitor or treat hazardous gas pollutants.

Supplementary Materials

The supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nano12122011/s1. Figure S1: Outermost electrons of gas molecules; Figure S2: Atomic structural of SLBP; Figures S3 and S4: Variations of Ead with dshortest, orientations of gas molecule or adsorption sites: Figure S5: Thermodynamically favorable adsorption configurations of gas molecules on SLBP. Figure S6: Modified interaction energies of dioxide on d–SLBP; Figure S7: Stable adsorption configurations for NO and NH3 on d-SLBP; Figure S8: TDOS and PDOS of NO on d–SLBP. Text S1–S2: Model construction and calculation details, it includes Figures S9–S16; Text S3–S4: Computational results on adsorption of gas molecules on SLBP; Text S5–S6: Computational results on individual d–SLBP and gas molecules on d–SLBP, it includes Figures S17–S16, Tables S1 and S2; Text S7: Nature of the [NO] species, it includes Figure S20 and Table S3; Text S8: Deformation of DV3, it includes Figure S21 and Table S4; Text S9: Single electron dominated mechanism for SLBP or d–SLBP absorbing gas molecules, it includes Figures S22–S26; Text S10: Experimental Details, it includes Figure S27.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.Z. and S.Z.; methodology, J.Z. and S.Z.; software, J.Z.; formal analysis, J.Z., X.Z., Q.Z. and S.Z.; investigation, X.Z., Q.Z. and S.Z.; data curation, J.Z. and S.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, J.Z.; writing—review and editing, J.Z., X.Z., Q.Z. and S.Z.; supervision, X.-F.Y. and B.X.; funding acquisition, X.Z., Q.Z. and S.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42192574, 42022056, 22176196, 21976186, 42077394) and GDAS’ Project of Science and Technology Development (2020GDASYL-20200101002). The authors also acknowledge the Liaoning Province Natural Science Foundation (2020-YQ-10), CAS Pioneer Hundred Talents Program awarded to X.-J.Z. (2016–2021), the Revitalize Liaoning Talents Program (XLYC2007124, XLYC1907136, XLYC1907118) and the Shenyang Pioneer Scientific and Technological Innovation Talents Team (RC190362).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The computational resources were provided by the Computer Network Information Center of Chinese Academy of Science.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Resitoglu, I.A.; Altinisik, K.; Keskin, A. The pollutant emissions from diesel-engine vehicles and exhaust aftertreatment systems. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 2014, 17, 15–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Raoa, S.; Klimont, Z.; Steven, J.S.; Van Dingenen, R.; Dentener, F.; Bouwman, L.; Riahi, K.; Amann, M.; Bodirsky, B.L.; van Vuuren, D.P.; et al. Future air pollution in the shared socio-economic pathways. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2016, 42, 346–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Shen, R.; Schafer, K.; Shao, L.; Schnelle-Kreis, J.; Wang, Y.; Li, F.; Liu, Z.; Emeis, S.; Schmid, H.P. Chemical characteristics of PM2.5 during haze episodes in spring 2013 in Beijing. Urban Clim. 2017, 22, 51–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. International Energy Agency. Energy and Air Pollution 2016—World Energy Outlook Special Report; International Energy Agency: Paris, France, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  5. Lu, C.; Norback, D.; Li, Y.; Deng, Q. Early-life exposure to air pollution and childhood allergic diseases: An update on the link and its implications. Expert Rev. Clin. Immunol. 2020, 16, 813–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Siakavelas, G.I.; Georgiadis, A.G.; Charisiou, N.D. Cost-effective adsorption of oxidative coupling-derived ethylene using a molecular sieve. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2021, 44, 2041–2048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Li, D.; Yang, J.; Zhao, Y. Ultra-highly porous carbon from wasted soybean residue with tailored porosity and doped structure as renewable multi-purpose absorbent for efficient CO2, toluene and water vapor capture. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 337, 130283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Pangh, A.; Esrafili, M.D.; Nejad, M.R. A DFT investigation of CO and NO adsorption on Cu5Sc and Cu6Sc+ metallic clusters. Comput. Theor. Chem. 2022, 1210, 113657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, J.; Li, X.; Zhang, X. Development of graphene aerogels with high strength and ultrahigh adsorption capacity for gas purification. Mater. Des. 2021, 208, 109903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ngoc, H.V.; Pham, K.D. First-principles study on N2, H2, O2, NO, NO2, CO, CO2, and SO2 gas adsorption properties of the Sc2CF2 monolayer. Physica E 2022, 141, 115162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Schroeder, V.; Savagatrup, S.; He, M.; Lin, S.; Swager, T.M. Carbon nanotube chemical sensors. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 599–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hsu, H.C.; Shown, I.; Wei, H.Y.; Chang, Y.C.; Du, H.Y.; Lin, Y.G.; Tseng, C.A.; Wang, C.H. Graphene oxide as A promising photocatalyst for CO2 to methanol conversion. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 262–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Liu, H.; Zhu, Z.; Luo, Z.; Xu, X.F.; Tomanek, D.; Ye, P.D. Phosphorene: An unexplored 2D semiconductor with A high hole mobility. ACS Nano. 2014, 8, 4033–4041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zhao, Q.; Ma, W.; Pan, B.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, S.; Xing, B. Wrinkle-induced high sorption makes few-layered black phosphorus: A superior adsorbent for ionic organic compounds. Environ. Sci. Nano. 2018, 5, 1454–1465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Cho, S.Y.; Lee, Y.; Koh, H.J.; Jung, H.; Kim, J.S.; Yoo, H.W.; Kim, J.; Jung, H.T. Superior chemical sensing performance of black phosphorus: Comparison with MoS2 and graphene. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 7020–7028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ahmad, N.; Abbas, B.L.; Liang, C.; Ma, Y.Q.; Cong, S.; Zhou, C. Black phosphorus gas sensors. ACS Nano. 2015, 9, 5618–5624. [Google Scholar]
  17. Shao, J.; Xie, H.; Huang, H.; Li, Z.; Sun, Z.; Xu, Y.; Xiao, Q.; Yu, X.-F.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, H.; et al. Biodegradable black phosphorus-based nanospheres for In Vivo photothermal cancer therapy. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 12967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Song, S.J.; Shin, Y.C.; Lee, H.U.; Kim, B.; Han, D.W.; Lim, D. Dose- and time-dependent cytotoxicity of layered black phosphorus in fibroblastic cells. Nanomaterials 2018, 8, 408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, S.; Zhang, X.; Lei, L.; Yu, X.F.; Chen, J.; Ma, C.; Wu, F.; Zhao, Q.; Xing, B. pH-dependent degradation of layered black phosphorus: Essential role of hydroxide ions. Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 2019, 58, 467–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sibari, A.; Kerrami, Z.; Benaissa, M.; Kara, A. Coverage-dependent adsorption of small gas molecules on black phosphorene: A DFT study. Surf. Sci. 2021, 710, 121860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Shinde, P.V.; Kumar, A.; Late, D.J.; Rout, C.S. Recent advances in 2D black phosphorus based materials for gas sensing applications. J. Mater. Chem. C 2021, 9, 3773–3794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Donarelli, M.; Giancaterini, L.; Fioravanti, G.; Perrozzi, F.; Cantalini, C. Exfoliated black phosphorus gas sensing properties at room temperature. 2D Mater. 2016, 3, 025002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Han, D.; Han, X.M.; Liu, L.L.; Li, D.H.; Liu, Y.; Liu, Z.H.; Liu, D.M.; Chen, Y.; Zhuo, K.; Sang, S.B. Sub-ppb-Level Detection of Nitrogen Dioxide Based on High-Quality Black Phosphorus. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 13942–13951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Han, B.; Duan, Z.; Xu, J.; Zhu, Y.; Xu, Q.; Wang, H.; Tai, H.; Weng, J.; Zhao, Y. The art of integrated functionalization: Super stable black phosphorus achieved through metal-organic framework coating. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 2002232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ren, H.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, X.; Gao, C.; Guo, Y. Improving room-temperature trace NO2 sensing of black phosphorus nanosheets by incorporating benzyl viologen. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2020, 321, 128520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhang, H.; Kou, L.; Jiao, Y.; Du, A.; Tang, Y.; Ni, Y. Strain engineering of selective chemical adsorption on monolayer black phosphorous. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 503, 144033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yu, Q.H.; Jiang, Y.; Zhang, W.; Wu, B.Z.; Yin, J.R.; Zhang, P.; Ding, Y.H. Noble metal atoms doped phosphorene: Electronic properties and gas adsorption ability. Mater. Res. Express 2017, 4, 045703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tit, N.; Said, K.; Yamani, Z. Ab-initio investigation of adsorption of CO and CO2 molecules on graphene: Role of intrinsic defects on gas sensing. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 394, 219–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lei, S.Y.; Luan, S.; Yu, H. Co-doped phosphorene: Enhanced sensitivity of CO gas sensing. Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 2018, 32, 1850068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lalitha, M.; Nataraj, Y.; Lakshmipathi, S. Calcium decorated and doped phosphorene for gas adsorption. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016, 377, 311–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kou, L.; Frauenheim, T.; Chen, C. Phosphorene as A superior gas sensor: Selective adsorption and distinct I-V response. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2014, 5, 2675–2681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yang, Q.; Chen, X.P.; Meng, R.S.; Jiang, J.-K.; Liang, Q.H.; Tan, C.J.; Cai, M.; Sun, X.; Yang, D.G.; Ren, T.L. First-principles study of sulfur dioxide sensor based on phosphorenes. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2016, 37, 660–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Guo, S.; Yuan, L.; Liu, X.; Zhou, W.; Song, X.; Zhang, S. First-principles study of SO2 sensors based on phosphorene and its isoelectronic counterparts: GeS, GeSe, SnS, SnSe. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2017, 686, 83–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kaewmaraya, T.; Ngamwongwan, L.; Moontragoon, P.; Karton, A.; Hussain, T. Drastic improvement in gas-sensing characteristics of phosphorene nanosheets under vacancy defects and elemental functionalization. J. Phys. Chem. C 2018, 122, 20186–20193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hiroshi, K.; Keiji, M.; Kenichi, F.; Teijiro, Y. The electronic structures of NO2, NO2+ and NO2−. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1964, 37, 11. [Google Scholar]
  36. Fourre, I.; Silvi, B. What can we learn from two-center three-electron bonding with the topological analysis of ELF? Heteroatom. Chem. 2007, 18, 135–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Cai, Y.; Ke, Q.; Zhang, G.; Zhang, Y.W. Energetics, charge transfer, and magnetism of small molecules physisorbed on phosphorene. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 3102–3110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Frenking, G.; Loschen, C.; Krapp, A.; Fau, S.; Strauss, S.H. Electronic structure of CO—An exercise in modern chemical bonding theory. J. Comput. Chem. 2007, 28, 117–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wei, H.; Yang, J.Y. Defects in phosphorene. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 20474–20480. [Google Scholar]
  40. Su, Y.; Zheng, X.; Wang, X.; Zhang, X.; Sui, Y.; Wang, X. Two stable phosphorus-containing four-membered ring radical cations with inverse spin density distributions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 6251–6254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Mahabal, M.S.; Deshpande, M.D.; Hussain, T.; Ahuja, R. Sensing characteristics of phosphorene monolayers toward PH3 and AsH3 gases upon the introduction of vacancy defects. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 20428–20436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sun, S.; Hussain, T.; Zhang, W. Blue phosphorene monolayers as potential nano sensors for volatile organic compounds under point defects. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 486, 52–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Banhart, F.; Arkady, V.K.; Kotakoski, J. Structural defects in graphene. ACS Nano. 2011, 5, 26–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Farooq, M.U.; Hashmi, A.; Hong, J. Anisotropic bias dependent transport property of defective phosphorene layer. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 12482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hohenberg, P.; Kohn, W. Inhomogeneous electron gas. Phys. Rev. 1964, 136, 864–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. John, P.; Perdew, K.B.; Matthias, E. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 4. [Google Scholar]
  47. Giannozzi, P.; Car, R.; Scoles, G. Oxygen adsorption on graphite and nanotubes. J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 118, 1003–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Grimme, S. Semiempirical GGA-type density functional constructed with A long-range dispersion correction. J. Comput. Chem. 2006, 27, 1787–1799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sun, Q.Y.; Menga, R.S.; Chen, X.P. Adsorption of gas molecules on graphene-like InN monolayer: A first-principle study. Appl. Surf. Sci 2017, 404, 291–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kornev, A.N.; Galperin, V.E.; Panova, Y.S.; Arapova, A.V.; Baranov, E.V.; Fukin, G.K.; Abakumov, G.A. Structural variability of R2C adducts of 3a,6a-Diaza-1,4-diphosphapentalene: Tuning the N-P bonding. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2017, 643, 1208–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Veinot, A.J.; Blair, A.D.; Masuda, J.D. Crystal structure of 2-azido-1,3-bis-(2,6-diiso-propyl-phen-yl)-1,3,2-di-aza-phospho-lidine. Crystallogr. Commun. 2017, 73, 905–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ziletti, A.; Carvalho, A.; Trevisanutto, P.E.; Campbell, D.K.; Coker, D.F.; Castro Neto, A.H. Phosphorene oxides: Bandgap engineering of phosphorene by oxidation. Phys. Rev. B 2015, 91, 085407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ziletti, A.; Carvalho, A.; Campbell, D.K.; Coker, D.F.; Castro Neto, A.H. Oxygen defects in phosphorene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2015, 114, 046801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Sholl, D.S.; Steckel, J.A. Density Fuctional Theory: A Practical Introduction; John Wiley & Sons: Hobocen, NJ, USA, 2009; pp. 179–192. [Google Scholar]
  55. You, Y.; Deng, J.; Tan, X.; Gorjizadeh, N.; Yoshimura, M.; Smith, S.C.; Sahajwalla, V.; Joshi, R.K. On the mechanism of gas adsorption for pristine, defective and functionalized graphene. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2017, 19, 6051–6056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Zhang, Y.H.; Chen, Y.B.; Zhou, K.G.; Liu, C.H.; Zeng, J.; Zhang, H.L.; Peng, Y. Improving gas sensing properties of graphene by introducing dopants and defects: A first-principles study. Nanotechnology 2009, 20, 185504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Qin, Y.; Ye, Z. DFT study on interaction of NO2 with the vacancy-defected WO3 nanowires for gas-sensing. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2016, 222, 499–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Muhammad, A.; Nacir, T. Adsorption of NO and NO2 molecules on defected-graphene and ozone-treated graphene: First-principles analysis. Surf. Sci 2019, 684, 28–36. [Google Scholar]
  59. Kang, J.; Wood, J.D.; Wells, S.A.; Lee, J.H.; Liu, X.; Chen, K.S.; Hersam, M.C. Solvent exfoliation of electronic-grade, two-dimensional black phosphorus. ACS Nano. 2015, 9, 3596–3604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wang, J.; Liu, D.; Huang, H.; Yang, N.; Yu, B.; Wen, M.; Wang, X.; Chu, P.K.; Yu, X.F. In-plane black phosphorus/dicobalt phosphide heterostructure for efficient electrocatalysis. Angew. Chem. 2018, 57, 2600–2604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nanomaterials 12 02011 g001 550
Figure 1. Side and top views of fully optimized geometries of SLBP and d-SLBP: (a) SLBP, (b) SW1, (c) SW2, (d) SV, (e) DV1, (f) DV2, (g) DV3, (h) EGz1, (i) EGz2, (j) EGa1 and (k) EGa2. T, T1, T2: top sites; B, B1–B3: bridge sites; H, H1–H4: hollow sites.
Figure 1. Side and top views of fully optimized geometries of SLBP and d-SLBP: (a) SLBP, (b) SW1, (c) SW2, (d) SV, (e) DV1, (f) DV2, (g) DV3, (h) EGz1, (i) EGz2, (j) EGa1 and (k) EGa2. T, T1, T2: top sites; B, B1–B3: bridge sites; H, H1–H4: hollow sites.
Nanomaterials 12 02011 g001
Nanomaterials 12 02011 g002 550
Figure 2. Adsorption energies (Ead, eV) computed for stable adsorption configurations of NO2 (a), SO2 (b) or CO2 (c) on different adsorption sites of d−SLBP. Ead values of the most stable adsorption configurations (d). The most stable adsorption configurations of NO2 on SLBP, SV, DV3, EGz1 and EGa2 (e).
Figure 2. Adsorption energies (Ead, eV) computed for stable adsorption configurations of NO2 (a), SO2 (b) or CO2 (c) on different adsorption sites of d−SLBP. Ead values of the most stable adsorption configurations (d). The most stable adsorption configurations of NO2 on SLBP, SV, DV3, EGz1 and EGa2 (e).
Nanomaterials 12 02011 g002
Nanomaterials 12 02011 g003 550
Figure 3. Spin density distribution on d−SLBP. (a) SW1, (b) SW2, (c) SV, (d) DV1, (e) DV2, (f) DV3, (g) EGz1, (h) EGz2, (i) EGa1 and (j) EGa2. Blue and yellow isosurfaces mean non−zero positive and negative spin density, respectively. Black numbers: spin population. Red numbers: Labels of phosphorus atoms.
Figure 3. Spin density distribution on d−SLBP. (a) SW1, (b) SW2, (c) SV, (d) DV1, (e) DV2, (f) DV3, (g) EGz1, (h) EGz2, (i) EGa1 and (j) EGa2. Blue and yellow isosurfaces mean non−zero positive and negative spin density, respectively. Black numbers: spin population. Red numbers: Labels of phosphorus atoms.
Nanomaterials 12 02011 g003
Nanomaterials 12 02011 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) Modified interaction energy (Ead−def, eV) for adsorption of NO and NH3 on SV, DV3, EGz1 and EGa2. (b) The most stable adsorption configurations of NO on SV, DV3, EGz1 and EGa2.
Figure 4. (a) Modified interaction energy (Ead−def, eV) for adsorption of NO and NH3 on SV, DV3, EGz1 and EGa2. (b) The most stable adsorption configurations of NO on SV, DV3, EGz1 and EGa2.
Nanomaterials 12 02011 g004
Nanomaterials 12 02011 g005 550
Figure 5. TDOS of adsorption complexes of NO2 and SLBP/d−SLBP (black solid line), and PDOS of SLBP/d−SLBP (red solid line) in adsorption complexes (upper panel). (a) SLBP, (b) SW1, (c) SV, (d) DV3, (e) EGz1 and (f) EGa2. Partial DOS of p orbitals of N (cyan solid line) and O (orange solid line) atoms, and P atom (blue solid line) (lower panel). Green dash line: Fermi level.
Figure 5. TDOS of adsorption complexes of NO2 and SLBP/d−SLBP (black solid line), and PDOS of SLBP/d−SLBP (red solid line) in adsorption complexes (upper panel). (a) SLBP, (b) SW1, (c) SV, (d) DV3, (e) EGz1 and (f) EGa2. Partial DOS of p orbitals of N (cyan solid line) and O (orange solid line) atoms, and P atom (blue solid line) (lower panel). Green dash line: Fermi level.
Nanomaterials 12 02011 g005
Nanomaterials 12 02011 g006 550
Figure 6. XPS spectra (P 2p) of LBP nanoflakes exposed to N2 (a), CO2 (b), or NO2 (c) for 24h.
Figure 6. XPS spectra (P 2p) of LBP nanoflakes exposed to N2 (a), CO2 (b), or NO2 (c) for 24h.
Nanomaterials 12 02011 g006
Table
Table 1. Parameters for the most stable adsorption configurations of gas molecules on perfect SLBP.
Table 1. Parameters for the most stable adsorption configurations of gas molecules on perfect SLBP.
GasesOrientation [a]dshortest [b]
(Å)		Ead [c]
(eV)		EvdW
(eV)		EvdW/Ead [d]Δq [e]
(e)
NO22Ovz2.91−0.225−0.16071%−0.14
SO2pz2.91−0.310−0.19563%−0.11
Svz3.07−0.309−0.17557%−0.09
CO2pa3.44−0.156−0.12479%−0.01
NOpa2.47−0.200−0.14271%−0.15
COpa3.37−0.138−0.11382%−0.01
pa3.41−0.138−0.11080%−0.02
NH3Nva3.17−0.207−0.14872%0.04
[a] 2O, S and N indicate two O atoms, one S atom and one N atom pointing toward SLBP; v and p indicate that the gas molecule stands vertically or parallel to SLBP; z and a represent zigzag and armchair directions. [b] The shortest distance between adsorbed gas molecule and SLBP. [c] Ead: adsorption energy including vdW correction. A negative value means exothermic adsorption. [d] Ratio of vdW energy (EvdW) to Ead. [e] Charge transfer amounts during adsorption. A negative sign “−” represents that a negative charge transfers from SLBP to absorbed gas molecules.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhao, J.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, Q.; Yu, X.-F.; Zhang, S.; Xing, B. Unique Interaction between Layered Black Phosphorus and Nitrogen Dioxide. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 2011. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12122011

AMA Style

Zhao J, Zhang X, Zhao Q, Yu X-F, Zhang S, Xing B. Unique Interaction between Layered Black Phosphorus and Nitrogen Dioxide. Nanomaterials. 2022; 12(12):2011. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12122011

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhao, Jingjing, Xuejiao Zhang, Qing Zhao, Xue-Feng Yu, Siyu Zhang, and Baoshan Xing. 2022. "Unique Interaction between Layered Black Phosphorus and Nitrogen Dioxide" Nanomaterials 12, no. 12: 2011. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12122011

APA Style

Zhao, J., Zhang, X., Zhao, Q., Yu, X.-F., Zhang, S., & Xing, B. (2022). Unique Interaction between Layered Black Phosphorus and Nitrogen Dioxide. Nanomaterials, 12(12), 2011. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12122011

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop