Next Article in Journal
Synthesis, Phase Transformations and Strength Properties of Nanostructured (1 − x)ZrO2 − xCeO2 Composite Ceramics
Previous Article in Journal
The Dose- and Time-Dependent Cytotoxic Effect of Graphene Nanoplatelets: In Vitro and In Vivo Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Review of Highly Mismatched III-V Heteroepitaxy Growth on (001) Silicon
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Special Issue: Silicon Nanodevices

1
Research and Development Center of Optoelectronic Hybrid IC, Guangdong Greater Bay Area Institute of Integrated Circuit and System, Guangzhou 510535, China
2
Beijing Superstring Academy of Memory Technology, Beijing 100176, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2022, 12(12), 1980; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12121980
Submission received: 26 May 2022 / Accepted: 30 May 2022 / Published: 9 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Silicon Nanodevices)
In recent years, nanodevices have attracted a large amount of attention due to their low power consumption and fast operation in electronics and photonics, as well as their high sensitivity in sensor applications. For example, following Moore’s law and the technology roadmap, the structure of transistors has been scaled down by a constant factor in order to obtain lower power consumption. Today, the scaling down of CMOS technology is focusing more on low voltages and cost-effective processes to match the requirements of mobile phone chips [1].
As a result of CMOS evolution, a lot of integration difficulties have been overcome, enabling the architecture of CMOS technology to change from planar or 2D to 3D. During this technology development, many issues, e.g., contact resistance, defects and reliability, have arisen and have been solved, which could affect device performance [2,3]. As an approach at the end of the technology roadmap (3 nm node), Si channel material is being changed to SiGe or Ge material, and even III-V materials could be integrated in the future. This is due to their material properties, as they have significantly higher carrier mobilities of −40,000 cm2 V−1 s−1 for InGaAs (for electrons) and 1900 cm2 V−1 s−1 for Ge (for holes) compared to silicon, which has 1400 cm2 V−1 s−1 for electrons and 450 cm2 V−1 s−1 for holes [1]. In many cases, these are processed to be fin-like or nanowire transistors on insulator substrates. Special attention is paid to All Gate Around (GAA) transistors in vertical or horizontal directions. In such cases, GeSi/Ge multilayers are grown, and later, GeSi can be selectively etched to reach a nano-scale channel [4]. What is interesting is the choice of our transistor design beyond Moore’s era. Meanwhile, as a future type of computation that could be used when Moore’s Law ends, quantum computing is gaining considerable attention from academic and industrial communities. Group IV material devices will be an important aspect of quantum computing.
Currently, photonic and sensor devices have also attracted a large amount of interest. For example, materials are required for emissions in the infrared and terahertz range with high responsivity and low dark currents [5,6,7]. Therefore, many studies are seeking methods to decrease the defect density, in particular in device processing. The main goal is to find a monolithic solution where a material can be used for both photonic and electronic components on the chip. Ge and GeSn are materials that are recognized as excellent candidates as optoelectronic materials [8,9,10,11,12].
In this field, nanodevices are manufactured in 3D, and the emergence of electronics and photonics is inevitable. It is obvious that the complexity of our society requires technology to become more complicated in its design. In the future, electronic–photonic designs will be our ultimate goal in nanotechnology.
This Special Issue presents the fabrication and characterization of group IV nanostructures, nanodevices and nanosensors and their integration with photonics. The issue also covers optoelectronic materials and defect engineering as well as characterization.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Radamson, H.H.; Simoen, E.; Luo, J.; Zhao, C. Past, Present and Future of CMOS; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 95–114. ISBN 978-008-102-13. [Google Scholar]
  2. Zhang, Q.; Yin, H.; Luo, J.; Yang, H.; Meng, L.; Li, Y.; Wu, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Qin, C.; et al. FOI FinFET with ultra-low parasitic resistance enabled by fully metallic source and drain formation on isolated bulk-fin. In Proceedings of the International Electron Devices Meeting, San Francisco, CA, USA, 3–7 December 2016; pp. 17.3.1–17.3.4. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ma, X.L.; Yin, H.X.; Hong, P.Z.; Xu, W.J. Self-Aligned Fin-On-Oxide (FOO) FinFETs for Improved SCE Immunity and Multi-V-TH Operation on Si Substrate. ECS Solid State Lett. 2015, 4, Q13–Q16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhang, Y.; Ai, X.; Yin, X.; Zhu, H.; Yang, H.; Wang, G.L.; Li, J.J.; Du, A.Y.; Li, C.; Radamson, H.H. Vertical Sandwich GAA FETs with Self-Aligned High-k Metal Gate Made by Quasi Atomic Layer Etching Process. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices. 2021, 68, 2604–2610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhao, X.; Wang, G.; Lin, H.; Du, Y.; Luo, X.; Kong, Z.; Su, J.; Li, J.; Xiong, W.; Radamson, H.H. High Performance pin Photodetectors on Ge-on-Insulator Platform. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Michel, J.; Liu, J.; Kimerling, L.C. High-performance Ge-on-Si photodetectors. Nat. Photonics 2010, 4, 527–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhao, X.; Moeen, M.; Toprak, M.S.; Wang, G.; Luo, J.; Ke, X.; Li, Z.; Liu, D.; Wang, W.; Zhao, C.; et al. Design impact on the performance of Ge PIN photodetectors. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2019, 31, 18–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Radamson, H.H.; Noroozi, M.; Jamshidi, A.; Thompson, P.E.; Ostling, M. Strain engineering in GeSnSi materials. ECS Trans. 2013, 50, 527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hu, T. Synthesis and Properties of Sn-Based Group IV Alloys; Arizona State University: Tempe, AZ, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  10. Vincent, B.; Gencarelli, F.; Bender, H.; Merckling, C.; Douhard, B.; Petersen, D.H.; Hansen, O.; Henrichsen, H.H.; Meersschaut, J.; Vandervorst, W.; et al. Undoped and in-situ B doped GeSn epitaxial growth on Ge by atmospheric pressure-chemical vapor deposition. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2011, 99, 152103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Margetis, J.; Mosleh, A.; Ghetmiri, S.A.; Al-Kabi, S.; Dou, W.; Du, W.; Bhargava, N.; Yu, S.-Q.; Profijt, H.; Kohen, D.; et al. Fundamentals of Ge1−xSnx and SiyGe1−x-ySnx RPCVD epitaxy. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Processing 2017, 70, 38–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Aubin, J.; Hartmann, J.M.; Gassenq, A.; Rouviere, J.L.; Robin, E.; Delaye, V.; Cooper, D.; Mollard, N.; Reboud, V.; Calvo, V. Growth and structural properties of step-graded, high Sn content GeSn layers on Ge. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 2017, 32, 094006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Radamson, H.H.; Wang, G. Special Issue: Silicon Nanodevices. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1980. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12121980

AMA Style

Radamson HH, Wang G. Special Issue: Silicon Nanodevices. Nanomaterials. 2022; 12(12):1980. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12121980

Chicago/Turabian Style

Radamson, Henry H., and Guilei Wang. 2022. "Special Issue: Silicon Nanodevices" Nanomaterials 12, no. 12: 1980. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12121980

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop