Next Article in Journal
Graphene: Hexagonal Boron Nitride Composite Films with Low-Resistance for Flexible Electronics
Next Article in Special Issue
Phase Separation in Ge-Rich GeSbTe at Different Length Scales: Melt-Quenched Bulk versus Annealed Thin Films
Previous Article in Journal
Plasmonic-Induced Transparencies in an Integrated Metaphotonic System
Previous Article in Special Issue
Interface Analysis of MOCVD Grown GeTe/Sb2Te3 and Ge-Rich Ge-Sb-Te/Sb2Te3 Core-Shell Nanowires
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Structural Assessment of Interfaces in Projected Phase-Change Memory

IBM Research Europe—Zurich Research Laboratory, CH-8803 Rüschlikon, Switzerland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2022, 12(10), 1702; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12101702
Submission received: 5 April 2022 / Revised: 27 April 2022 / Accepted: 9 May 2022 / Published: 17 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Synthesis, Properties and Applications of Germanium Chalcogenides)

Abstract

Non-volatile memories based on phase-change materials have gained ground for applications in analog in-memory computing. Nonetheless, non-idealities inherent to the material result in device resistance variations that impair the achievable numerical precision. Projected-type phase-change memory devices reduce these non-idealities. In a projected phase-change memory, the phase-change storage mechanism is decoupled from the information retrieval process by using projection of the phase-change material’s phase configuration onto a projection liner. It has been suggested that the interface resistance between the phase-change material and the projection liner is an important parameter that dictates the efficacy of the projection. In this work, we establish a metrology framework to assess and understand the relevant structural properties of the interfaces in thin films contained in projected memory devices. Using X-ray reflectivity, X-ray diffraction and transmission electron microscopy, we investigate the quality of the interfaces and the layers’ properties. Using demonstrator examples of Sb and Sb2Te3 phase-change materials, new deposition routes as well as stack designs are proposed to enhance the phase-change material to a projection-liner interface and the robustness of material stacks in the devices.
Keywords: in-memory computing; projected phase-change memory; interface engineering; confined phase-change material; sputtering deposition; X-ray reflectivity; STEM in-memory computing; projected phase-change memory; interface engineering; confined phase-change material; sputtering deposition; X-ray reflectivity; STEM

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bragaglia, V.; Jonnalagadda, V.P.; Sousa, M.; Sarwat, S.G.; Kersting, B.; Sebastian, A. Structural Assessment of Interfaces in Projected Phase-Change Memory. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1702. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12101702

AMA Style

Bragaglia V, Jonnalagadda VP, Sousa M, Sarwat SG, Kersting B, Sebastian A. Structural Assessment of Interfaces in Projected Phase-Change Memory. Nanomaterials. 2022; 12(10):1702. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12101702

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bragaglia, Valeria, Vara Prasad Jonnalagadda, Marilyne Sousa, Syed Ghazi Sarwat, Benedikt Kersting, and Abu Sebastian. 2022. "Structural Assessment of Interfaces in Projected Phase-Change Memory" Nanomaterials 12, no. 10: 1702. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12101702

APA Style

Bragaglia, V., Jonnalagadda, V. P., Sousa, M., Sarwat, S. G., Kersting, B., & Sebastian, A. (2022). Structural Assessment of Interfaces in Projected Phase-Change Memory. Nanomaterials, 12(10), 1702. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12101702

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop