Next Article in Journal
A-Site Cation Size Effect on Structure and Magnetic Properties of Sm(Eu,Gd)Cr0.2Mn0.2Fe0.2Co0.2Ni0.2O3 High-Entropy Solid Solutions
Previous Article in Journal
Gas-Phase Fluorination of g-C3N4 for Enhanced Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 12
Issue 1
10.3390/nano12010034
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Facile In Situ Synthesis of Co(OH)2–Ni3S2 Nanowires on Ni Foam for Use in High-Energy-Density Supercapacitors

by
Xuan Liang Wang
1,†,
En Mei Jin
1,†,
Jiasheng Chen
1,
Parthasarathi Bandyopadhyay
1,
Bo Jin
2 and
Sang Mun Jeong
1,*
1
Department of Chemical Engineering, Chungbuk National University, 1 Chungdae-ro, Seowon-gu, Cheongju 28644, Chungbuk, Korea
2
Key Laboratory of Automobile Materials, Ministry of Education, and College of Materials Science and Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130022, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Nanomaterials 2022, 12(1), 34; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12010034
Submission received: 19 November 2021 / Revised: 18 December 2021 / Accepted: 19 December 2021 / Published: 23 December 2021
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Ni3S2 nanowires were synthesized in situ using a one-pot hydrothermal reaction on Ni foam (NF) for use in supercapacitors as a positive electrode, and various contents (0.3−0.6 mmol) of Co(OH)2 shells were coated onto the surfaces of the Ni3S2 nanowire cores to improve the electrochemical properties. The Ni3S2 nanowires were uniformly formed on the smooth NF surface, and the Co(OH)2 shell was formed on the Ni3S2 nanowire surface. By direct NF participation as a reactant without adding any other Ni source, Ni3S2 was formed more closely to the NF surface, and the Co(OH)2 shell suppressed the loss of active material during charging–discharging, yielding excellent electrochemical properties. The Co(OH)2–Ni3S2/Ni electrode produced using 0.5 mmol Co(OH)2 (Co0.5–Ni3S2/Ni) exhibited a high specific capacitance of 1837 F g−1 (16.07 F cm−2) at a current density of 5 mA cm−2, and maintained a capacitance of 583 F g−1 (16.07 F cm−2) at a much higher current density of 50 mA cm−2. An asymmetric supercapacitor (ASC) with Co(OH)2–Ni3S2 and active carbon displayed a high-power density of 1036 kW kg−1 at an energy density of 43 W h kg−1 with good cycling stability, indicating its suitability for use in energy storage applications. Thus, the newly developed core–shell structure, Co(OH)2–Ni3S2, was shown to be efficient at improving the electrochemical performance.

1. Introduction

Currently, the main concerns in society are efficient energy storage and clean energy. Supercapacitors are the most ideal devices for use in clean energy storage, owing to their low costs, rapid discharge rates, and high electrochemical activities, in addition to mechanical and thermal stabilities [1,2]. However, despite numerous advantages, supercapacitors exhibit lower energy densities (~10 W h kg−1) compared to those of Li-ion batteries (LIBs, typically <300 Wh kg−1) [3,4]. Supercapacitors can be divided into electrochemical double-layer capacitors (EDLCs) and pseudocapacitors. EDLCs employ an electric double layer formed at the interface of an electrolyte and a polarizable electrode, such as activated carbon (AC), and pseudocapacitors are based on the Faradaic electrochemical redox mechanism of charge storage [5]. Carbons with high surface areas are mainly used in EDLCs, whereas in pseudocapacitor research, oxides, such as ruthenium and manganese, are mainly used. According to a review of recent advances in carbon–based materials for use in supercapacitor electrodes, the specific energy is generally <10 Wh kg−1 [3,6,7]. Recently, mono– and bimetallic oxides, layered double hydroxides, and transition metal sulfides were proposed to overcome the lower energy densities in supercapacitors [8,9,10,11]. The transition metal sulfides (nickel or cobalt sulfide) exhibited considerable potential; in particular, nickel sulfides exhibit excellent electrochemical energy storage and fascinating properties, such as excellent redox reversibility, conductivities, and capacitances [12,13,14,15]. However, low-rate capability and poor electrochemical stability limit practical applications because of the surface Faradaic redox reactions and reverse kinetics during rapid charge−discharge [16]. Nickel sulfides have various phases, such as α– and β–NiS, NiS2, and Ni3S2 are low−cost, abundant materials with widespread applications, such as LIB and supercapacitor electrode materials [17,18,19,20].
The most recently reported nickel sulfide-based research mainly focuses on engineering vacancies including control of morphologies and phase crystallinities, binding them with other carbon materials, and doping to optimize electrochemical performance [21,22,23,24,25]. For example, Chou et al. prepared a binder-free flaky Ni3S2 electrode as a positive material that displayed a high specific capacitance (SC) of 717 F g−1 at 2 A g−1 and excellent cycle retention of 91% [24]. Krishnamoorthy et al. used a one-pot hydrothermal method to prepare nest–type Ni3S2 with an SC of 1293 F g−1 at 5 mA cm−2 [25]. Li et al. used single–crystal β–NiS nanorod arrays to synthesize Ni3S2@β−NiS materials with novel 3D architectures and pine twig-like morphologies in hollow Ni3S2 porous frameworks, with an SC of 1158 F g−1 at 2 A g−1 [26]. Hu et al. proposed a phase modulation strategy dominated by a novel coordination agent supported by a hydrothermal process [27].
In addition, the crystallization and morphology of nickel sulfide are primarily tuned by controlling the sulfur source in the reaction. In general, nickel sulfide is synthesized by dissolving metal salts, such as nickel acetate, nitrate, and chloride, and sulfur precursors, such as sodium sulfate, thioacetamide (TAA), thiourea (TU), and sodium thiosulfate, in solution [28,29,30,31,32,33,34]. Chen et al. used Ni(NO3)2·6H2O and TU to directly prepare Ni3S2 on Ni foam (NF) [35], and Wu et al. used TAA and NF to prepare rod–like Ni3S2 [36].
In addition, numerous studies were conducted to evaluate core–shell structures to improve the electrochemical properties of Ni3S2-based supercapacitors [37,38,39,40]. The core–shell structure protects the active material, ensuring excellent cycle stability during charging and discharging. However, multi-step reactions are generally performed to prepare core–shell structures. For example, Chen et al. used a two-step hydrothermal reaction to fabricate the core–shell structures of Ni3S2@Co(OH)2 nanowires formed directly on NF for use in asymmetric supercapacitors (ASCs), and the Ni3S2@Co(OH)2 electrode exhibiting a high SC of 2139.4 F g−1 at 2 mA cm−2, and maintaining a capacitance of 1139.4 F g−1 at 40 mA cm−2 [37].
In this study, the core–shell structured Co(OH)2−Ni3S2 was synthesized in situ using a one–step hydrothermal reaction on NF as a binder-free positive electrode for use in supercapacitors. By direct NF participation as a reactant, without adding any other Ni source, Ni3S2 was formed more closely to the NF surface, and the Co(OH)2 shell suppressed the loss of active material during charging–discharging. Moreover, NF provides sufficient microcavities for simple penetration of electrolyte ions and rapid transport of the generated gas. To suppress the active material loss during cycling, various amounts of Co were added to control the thickness of the shell, yielding excellent electrochemical properties. In addition, the electrochemical properties were investigated by assembling an ASC using Co(OH)2−Ni3S2 and AC as the positive electrode and negative electrode, respectively.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials

KOH (95%), sulfur powder, and CoCl2·6H2O (98%) were obtained from Sigma–Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). For ethyl alcohol (anhydrous, 99%), SAMCHUN chemicals (Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea) products were used, and for nickel form (NF, 99.5%), Goodfellow (Huntingdon, UK) products with a thickness of 1.5 mm and a bulk density of 0.45 g/cm3 were used.

2.2. Synthesis of Ni3S2 and Co(OH)2–Ni3S2 Positive Electrode

Ni3S2 nanowires for use as positive active materials were synthesized using a one-pot hydrothermal reaction. For synthesizing the Ni3S2 nanowires, the NF (2 × 1 cm2) was used as the reactant and substrate. First, NF was sonicated in 3 M HCl for 30 min, and then washed for 30 min by deionized water and ethanol with volume ration of 1:1 to remove organic impurities and surface oxidized layer. The washed NF was subsequently vacuum-dried overnight at 50 °C.
The detailed experimental procedure for synthesizing the NF–supported Ni3S2 nanowires is shown in Figure 1. The source of sulfur was the natural sulfur powder in molar ratios of 2 mmol. Sulfur powder (99.5%) was added to 8 mL of 3 M KOH and sonicated at 70 °C until the solution turned transparent yellow. A total of 8 mL of ethyl alcohol and NF (2 × 1 cm2) were then added, and the solution was sonicated for a few minutes. Subsequently, the uniform solution was transferred to hydrothermal reactor. The reactor was heated for 18 h at 160 °C. The product, Ni3S2, was collected after the reaction system was cooled to below 30 °C. Thereafter, the Ni3S2 film was washed and vacuum–dried at 50 °C overnight. During the hydrothermal process, sulfur reacts with the NF to uniformly deposit Ni3S2 on the NF surface. The reaction formula for the formation of nickel sulfide on the NF may be as below:
3OH− + 4S → 2S2− + S2O32− + 3H+
Ni + 2OH− → Ni(OH)2 + 2e−
3Ni(OH)2 + 2S2− → Ni3S2 + 6OH−
For preparation of core–shell structured Co(OH)2–Ni3S2, after all sonication steps were completed, the 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, or 0.6 mmol of the source of cobalt was added and in the solution, followed by hydrothermal reaction at 160 °C for 18 h. The 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, or 0.6 mmol cobalt–containing Co(OH)2–Ni3S2 electrodes are denoted as Co0.3–, Co0.4–, Co0.5–, and Co0.6–Ni3S2, with a mass loading of 6.2, 6.8, 7.3, and 8.1 mg cm−2, respectively.

2.3. Cell Assembly

For the electrochemical performance study, a three-electrode system was assembled using material formed in situ on NF (area ≈ 1 × 1 cm2). Ni3S2 or Co(OH)2–Ni3S2 was used as the working electrode and Ag/AgCl and a Pt plate were used as the reference and counter electrodes, respectively. In the three-electrode configuration, 3 M KOH solution was used as the electrolyte.
The ASC device was assembled by Co0.5–Ni3S2 and AC electrodes as the positive and as negative electrodes, respectively. KOH (3 M) and filter paper (Whatman 42) were used as the electrolyte and separator, respectively. Prior to assembling the ASC device, the AC negative electrode was prepared as follows: super-p carbon black, polyvinylidene fluoride, and AC as the conductive material, binder, and active material, respectively, were mixed in a mass ratio of 1:1:8 in N–methyl–2–pyrrolidinone (NMP) to form a uniform slurry. The slurry was uniformly coated on a Ni mesh and dried in an electrical oven at 60 °C for 1 h. The dried electrode was pressed and vacuum–dried at 110 °C for a day. In addition, the filter paper and as–prepared Co0.5–Ni3S2 were immersed in electrolyte for a day. The ASC device was then assembled by sequentially stacking the soaked Co0.5–Ni3S2 electrode, filter paper, and AC electrode.

2.4. Materials Characterization and Electrochemical Measurements

The crystal structures and morphologies were characterized using X-ray diffraction (XRD, Ultima IV, Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan), field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM, LEO–1530, Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany), and FE transmission electron microscopy (FE–TEM, 200 KV, JEM–2100F, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). To evaluate the elemental composition and oxidation state, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was performed using a PHI Quantera–II (Ulvac–PHI, Chigasaki, Japan).
The electrochemical performance of the three-electrode configuration was measured using an Autolab electrochemical workstation (AUT84455, Metrohm, Herisau, Switzerland). Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was performed in the frequency range 105–10−2 Hz at an amplitude of 10 mV using an Autolab electrochemical workstation (PGSTAT302N, Metrohm, The Netherlands). All resistances were determined using the NOVA program (Version 1.10.4, Metrohm, The Netherlands) to fit the related EI spectra. Cyclic voltammetry (CV, WBCS3000L, WonATech, Seoul, Korea) was measured at a scanning rate of 0.1 mV s−1 in the voltage range 1.5–3.2 V, and charge–discharge studies were performed at 0.1 C with a cut-off voltage of 1.5–3.2 V.

3. Results and Discussion

The XRD patterns of the Ni3S2 and Co(OH)2–Ni3S2 electrodes are shown in Figure 2. The XRD patterns of all samples are consistent with the hexagonal phase (JCPDS card no. 44–1418) in the R32(155) space group, with sharp, intense peaks at 2θ = 21.75°, 31.10°, 37.78°, 44.33°, 49.73°, 50.12°, 55.16°, and 55.34° representing the (101), (110), (003), (202), (113), (211), (122), and (300) diffraction planes, respectively [41]. Peaks representing the cubic phases corresponding to nickel (JCPDS card no. 87–0712) are observed at 2θ = 44.50° (111), 51.85° (200), and 76.38° (220) [42]. These nickel patterns are observed because Ni3S2 was formed on the NF. The Co(OH)2–Ni3S2 electrodes exhibit hexagonal and cubic phases, and their patterns lack the characteristic peaks representing Co(OH)2 because they overlap with the hexagonal peaks representing Co(OH)2 and/or the amorphous phase, which is formed by the hydrothermal reaction after CoCl2 addition [43]. Peaks representing Co(OH)2 corresponding to the hexagonal phase (JCPDS card no. 45–0031) are typically observed at 2θ = 32.22° (100), 37.65° (101), 51.09° (102), and 57.63° (110) [44].
Figure 3 shows the surface morphologies of the Ni3S2 and Co(OH)2–Ni3S2 electrodes with different Co contents were characterized using FE-SEM and elemental mapping analysis. Ni3S2 exhibits a smooth surface, with the Ni3S2 nanowires uniformly formed on the NF surface following the hydrothermal reaction, clearly indicating that the NF reacts with the added sulfur. The Ni3S2 nanowires form very uniformly in terms of length and thickness, and no other form of Ni3S2 is observed in the SEM images. As shown in the highly magnified SEM image of Ni3S2 (inset of Figure 3b), long, thin nanowires are observed, with an average diameter of ~150 ± 10 nm. As the amount of added Co increases, the smoothness of the nanowire surface decreases and the Co(OH)2 shell thickness increases (Figure 3c–f), because Co(OH)2 is only formed on the surfaces of the Ni3S2 nanowires, rendering their surfaces rough. A rough surface may exhibit high electrolyte adsorption capacity due to its large specific surface area, and Co(OH)2 may suppress the Ni3S2 active material loss during the cycling, resulting in excellent electrochemical properties. In addition, as shown by the side views of the elemental mapping images (Figure 3g,h), all elements are distributed uniformly on the nanowires. Therefore, the synthesis via hydrothermal reaction at 160 °C for 18 h is successful.
HRTEM was conducted to further explore the structures of the Co0.5–Ni3S2 nanowires. As shown in Figure 4a,b, the Ni3S2 nanowires cores are uniformly covered by Co(OH)2 nanosheets shells. The interphase between Ni3S2 and Co(OH)2 is no clear boundary observed, indicating that a close contact was formed between them. Such a structure may result in improved electrochemical performance as it favors electron transfer during the Faradaic redox reactions [45]. The diameters of the core Ni3S2 nanowires are ~150 nm, and the Co(OH)2 layers covering the Ni3S2 nanowires exhibit thicknesses in the range 20–40 nm. As shown in Figure 4c, the Co0.5–Ni3S2 nanowires exhibit uniform distributions of Ni, S, and Co. This further confirming the formation of a uniform, well-defined core–shell structure. The HRTEM image of the Co0.5–Ni3S2 nanowire (Figure 4d) reveals lattice spacings of 0.4, 0.28, and 0.24 nm, corresponding to the (110) and (101) interplanar spacings of Ni3S2 and the (101) interplanar spacings of Co(OH)2, respectively. As shown in the selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern (Figure 4e), several distinct concentric rings clearly indicate the polycrystallinity of Ni3S2, and the diffraction rings from inside to outside correspond to the (101), (110), (003), (202), (113), and (104) crystalline planes of Ni3S2, respectively.
Additional evidence regarding the chemical state of the as-synthesized Co0.5–Ni3S2 electrode was obtained using XPS. The full survey spectrum (Figure 5a) of the Co0.5–Ni3S2 electrode reveals that only Ni, Co, O, and C are present, with no other impurity peaks observed. The presence of Co and O is likely caused by the adsorption of Co(OH)2 at the surface of the Ni3S2 nanowire, and the small C presence may be due to the reference and the exposure of the sample to the atmosphere [46]. The high-resolution spectrum of Ni 2p (Figure 5b) shows two main core levels of Ni 2p3/2 and Ni 2p1/2 that are characteristic of the Ni state are located at 855.1 and 872.8 eV, with two satellite peaks at 860.9 and 878.9 eV, respectively, indicating the formation of Ni2+ and Ni3+ [47,48,49]. To investigate the Co(OH)2 shell formation on the surfaces of the Ni3S2 nanowires, the Co 2p XP spectrum was obtained, as shown in Figure 5c. Peaks representing Co 2p3/2 (780.4 and 774.0 eV) and Co 2p1/2 (796.5 and 796.0 eV) are observed. These peaks (796.0 and 780.4 eV) are attributed to Co2+, indicating the formation of Co(OH)2 [50,51,52]. For detailed insight into the presence of hydroxide, the O 1s spectrum of the Co0.5–Ni3S2 electrode was analyzed, as shown in Figure 5d. The curve fitting of the O 1s spectrum indicates that the sample consists of two components, represented by peaks at 531.5 and 530.4 eV. The 531.5 eV peak indicates a bound hydroxide group (OH−), confirming that Co(OH)2 is successfully formed on the Ni3S2 surface [53,54]. The small peak at 530.4 eV indicates the H–O bonds in water [55,56,57]. Therefore, the XP spectra, when combined with the XRD and TEM results, indicate the successful preparation of the Co(OH)2 shells on the surfaces of the Ni3S2 nanowire cores.
The electrochemical behaviors of the Ni3S2 and Co(OH)2–Ni3S2 electrodes were initially investigated using CV (Figure 6a). For Ni3S2, redox peaks are observed at 0.20 and 0.30 V, respectively, indicating pseudocapacitive behavior [58]. Compared to those of Ni3S2, the redox peaks shift negatively in the voltammogram of Co(OH)2–Ni3S2, indicating that the surface redox reactions of Co2+/Co3+/Co4+ and Ni2+/Ni3+ may facilitate OH− transfer from the electrolyte [59,60]. The voltammogram of Co0.5–Ni3S2 clearly shows a large integrated area, suggesting that the former exhibits a higher electrochemical capacitance. Figure 6b shows the CV of the Co0.5–Ni3S2 electrode at scan rates ranging from 5 to 50 mV s−1. The response current density increases linearly with increasing scan rate and the cathodic and cathodic current peaks are shifted more positively and negatively, respectively. However, as the scan rates increase, clear redox peaks are observed, indicating the slow electron or ion transfer kinetics of the interfacial redox reactions [61]. Conversely, the voltammograms of Co0.5–Ni3S2 at scan rates of ≤20 mV s−1 retain their original shapes, and the currents are higher than that of Ni3S2, indicating the rapid kinetics of electron or ion transfer in the interfacial redox reactions [62]. Figure 6c shows the galvanostatic charge/discharge (GCD) curves of Co0.5–Ni3S2 at different current densities. All GCD curves shows the clear voltage plateaus suggesting Faradaic redox reactions. The specific capacitance, SCs, (CS, F g−1) and area capacitances (CA, F cm−2) of the electrodes are calculated based on the GCD curves using the following equations [63]:
C S = I · ( Δ t Δ V ) m
C A = I · ( Δ t Δ V ) A
where I, Δ V , Δ t , m, and A denote the discharge current (mA), working potential window (V), discharging time (s), deposited mass of the active material (g), and area of the NF coated with the active material (1 × 1 cm2), respectively.
Figure 6d,e shows the rate capabilities of various electrodes calculated during GCD. Co0.5–Ni3S2 exhibits a very high SC compared to those of the other samples. The SC (plot with slid lines) is 742.6 F g−1 (9.25 F cm−2) at a current density of 10 mA cm−2, which declines to 451.8 F g−1 (5.63 F cm−2) when the current density increases to 50 mA cm−2. As shown in the GCD curve, the electrode materials of the Ni3S2 and Co-Ni3S2 shows the clearly redox plateau; therefore, the specific and area capacities (dotted lines) were also plotted in the Figure 6d,e. The discharge capacity of Co0.5–Ni3S2 shows that the 90.1 mAh g−1 at a current density of 10 mA cm−2 and 52.8 mAh g−1 at 50 mA cm−2. The high SC and capacity of Co0.5–Ni3S2 may be due to the unique core–shell nanowires, wherein highly conductive Ni3S2 with a high SC is critical in enhancing the capacitance of Co(OH)2 with an ultrathin nanosheet morphology. Figure 6f shows the cycling performances of Ni3S2 and Co–Ni3S2. Ni3S2 and Co0.5–Ni3S2 showed retention rates of 83.7% and 95.4%, respectively, up to 1000 cycles, indicating that the core–shell structure improves the long–term electrochemical stability of the KOH electrolyte system. The optimal SC and cycling performance of the electroactive Ni3S2 electrode are superior or comparable to those of previously reported Ni3S2 electrodes (Table 1) [25,64,65,66,67,68].
The electrochemical performance of the AC electrode in the three–electrode configuration was measured, with the AC coated on a nickel mesh (1 × 1 cm2) used as the working electrode. Figure 7 shows the electrochemical behavior of the AC electrode at different scan rates. The CV curves (Figure 7a) of the AC electrode reveal excellent symmetrical rectangular shapes at all scan rates. This is characteristic of an ideal EDLC material and suggests good charge propagation, rapid ion diffusion within the pores and reorganization of the electrical double layer, and low contact resistance [69]. Figure 7b,c show the GCD curves of the AC electrode at different current densities (10–50 mA cm−2) and the rate capabilities, respectively. The charge–discharge curves of AC electrodes are linear and symmetrical, indicating the good reversibility. The SCs of the AC electrode are calculated based on the GCD curves using Equation (1). An SC is 109.8 F g−1 (0.4 F cm−2) appears at 5 mA cm−2, which declines to 101.5 F g−1 (0.34 F cm−2) at 50 mA cm−2. The AC electrode maintains 99.5% of its initial capacitance after 2000 cycles as shown in Figure 6d.
The ASC device was assembled in a two-electrode configuration using a Co0.5–Ni3S2 positive electrode and an AC negative electrode. Prior to assembling the ASC device, the mass balance of the positive and negative electrodes was determined. The mass (m) of the positive and negative electrodes was determined by Equation (3) [70]:
m + m − = C − × Δ V − C + × Δ V +
where m, C, and Δ V are the masses, SCs, and potential windows of the Co0.5–Ni3S2 positive (+) and AC negative (−) electrodes, in a typical three–electrode configuration. The mass ratio of AC and Co0.5–Ni3S2 is 2.73:1. The SC of the device was calculated using Equation (1), where m is the sum of the deposited masses of Co0.5–Ni3S2 and AC (cathode and anode materials, respectively). The total active mass is 27 mg. The potential window of the Co0.5–Ni3S2//AC device is obtained from the cyclic voltammograms of Co0.5–Ni3S2 (Figure 6b) and AC (Figure 7a) in a three–electrode cell. AC exhibits the typical EDLC pattern in the potential range from −1.0–0.0 V and Co0.5–Ni3S2 exhibits the potential range 0–0.4 V. Based on the cyclic voltammograms of the Co0.5–Ni3S2 and AC electrodes, the potential window of the ASC device may be extended to 1.6 V [71].
The cyclic voltammograms exhibit large current areas with broad redox peaks, which are typical of asymmetric supercapacitors that combine electrochemical capacitors and EDLC properties [72]. The potential window of the Co0.5–Ni3S2//AC device was again confirmed using CV at different windows. As shown in Figure 8a, no clear polarization is observed in the voltage range 0.0–1.60 V, indicating that 1.40 V is a reasonable potential window limit for this ASC in 3.0 M KOH electrolyte. Therefore, the combined working potential of the ASC is 1.6 V. Figure 8b shows the CV of the ASC at different scan rates in the potential window 0–1.6 V. The CV exhibit broad redox peaks, which are associated with the pseudocapacitive Ni3S2 and AC, indicating the ideal capacitive behavior of the device [73]. Figure 8c shows the typical GCD curves of the ASC with observed SCs of 2.37 F cm−2 (58.41 F g−1) at 20 mA cm−2. In addition, the SC retention of the ASC device is 94% at 20 mA cm−2, as shown in the inset of Figure 8c. To study the interfacial charge transfer resistance of the supercapacitor with the Co0.5–Ni3S2//AC device, EIS was performed after the 1st and 1000th discharges, as shown in Figure 8d. The Nyquist plot in the high–frequency region reveals that the electronic resistance of the device, also denoted the solution resistance (RS), is the equivalent series resistance (ESR), which describes the resistance of the electrolyte combined with the internal resistance of the electrode [74]. The semicircle is the result of the double-layer charging of the AC electrode and the Faradaic reaction of the Co0.5–Ni3S2 electrode. The slope of the curve in the low-frequency region corresponds to the Warburg element, which represents the electrolyte diffusion within the porous electrode and proton diffusion within the host material [75,76]. The Nyquist plot was fitted using the Randles equivalent circuit, as shown in the inset of Figure 8d, using the NOVA program, where Rct is the electrode-electrolyte charge transfer resistance, RL is the leakage resistance, CL is the double–layer capacitance, CPEDL is the constant phase element of the double layer, and CPEL is the mass capacitance. The ESR of the asymmetric device decreases from 0.25 to 0.22 Ω after 1000 cycles, and Rct also decreases after 1000 cycles, suggesting a significant decrease in the RS and Rct due to the increased surface area available during repeated cycling, which may improve the supercapacitor performance [77].
The Co0.5–Ni3S2//AC asymmetric device exhibits a maximum energy density of 60.3 W h kg−1 (20 mA cm−2) at a power density of 1944.3 W kg−1 (50 mA cm−2) and 36.0 W h kg−1 at a power density of 4309 W kg−1. The energy (E, W h kg−1) and power densities (P, W kg−1) are calculated based on the discharge curve using Equations (4) and (5), respectively [78]:
E = I ∫ V d t m × 3.6
P = E × 3600 t
where, I, ∫ V d t , m, and t are the discharge current (mA), integral area under the discharge curve, masses, and discharging time (s), respectively. The results are comparable or even superior to those of previously reported supercapacitors (Table 2), such as the rGO@Ni3S2//AC (37.19 W h kg−1 at 399.9 W kg−1), Ni3S2//AC (36 W h kg−1 at 400 W kg−1), and Ni3S2@CoS//AC (23.69 W h kg−1 at 268.95 W kg−1) devices [66,79,80,81,82,83,84,85]. A comparison of these results based on power and energy densities with related reported devices is also summarized. To further evaluate the practical applications of the Co0.5–Ni3S2//AC asymmetric device, the assembled device easily powers an LED after charging, as shown in the inset of Figure 8c. The Co0.5–Ni3S2//AC asymmetric device exhibits considerable potential for use in next–generation flexible energy storage devices, for applications in smart, wearable electronics.

4. Conclusions

Ni3S2 and Co(OH)2 shell-coated Ni3S2 nanowires were successfully prepared using a facile one–step hydrothermal reaction as positive electrodes for use in supercapacitors. The Ni3S2 nanowires were uniformly formed on the smooth NF surface, and the Co(OH)2 shell was uniformly formed on the Ni3S2 nanowire surface. As NF participates directly as the nickel source, Ni3S2 was formed more closely to the NF surface, and the Co(OH)2 shell suppressed the loss of active material during charging–discharging. The 0.5 mmol Co(OH)2 shell–coated Co0.5–Ni3S2 electrode exhibited superior performance, with a high discharge capacity of 1837 F g−1 (16.07 F cm−2) at a current density of 5 mA cm−2, and maintained a satisfactory rate capability of 583 F g−1 (16.07 F cm−2) at a much higher current density of 50 mA cm−2. The ASC delivers a power density as high as 1036 W kg−1 at an energy density of 43 W h kg−1, with a good cycling stability of 92%, which reveals its suitability for use in numerous energy storage applications. Therefore, the core–shell architecture developed in this study is an efficient way to improve the electrochemical performances in various promising energy storage applications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.M.J.; methodology, X.L.W.; investigation, X.L.W. and J.C.; data curation, X.L.W.; writing, E.M.J.; review and editing, P.B. and B.J.; visualization, supervision, project administration, and funding acquisition, S.M.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by Chungbuk National University, Korea National University Development Project (2020).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Chungbuk National University, Republic of Korea.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Huang, S.; Zhu, X.; Sarkar, S.; Zhao, Y. Challenges and opportunities for supercapacitors. APL Mater. 2019, 7, 100901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Abdel Maksoud, M.I.A.; Fahim, R.A.; Shalan, A.E.; Abd Elkodous, M.; Olojede, S.O.; Osman, A.I.; Farrell, C.; Al-Muhtaseb, A.a.H.; Awed, A.S.; Ashour, A.H.; et al. Advanced materials and technologies for supercapacitors used in energy conversion and storage: A review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2020, 19, 375–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lee, S.-H.; Kim, K.-Y.; Yoon, J.-R. Binder- and conductive additive-free laser-induced graphene/LiNi1/3Mn1/3Co1/3O2 for advanced hybrid supercapacitors. NPG Asia Mater. 2020, 12, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lamb, J.J.; Burheim, O.S. Lithium-ion capacitors: A review of design and active materials. Energies 2021, 14, 979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sung, J.; Shin, C. Recent studies on supercapacitors with next-generation structures. Micromachines 2020, 11, 1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Simon, P.; Gogotsi, Y. Materials for electrochemical capacitors. Nat. Mater. 2008, 7, 845–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Obreja, V.V.N. Supercapacitors specialities-Materials review. AIP Conf. Proc. 2014, 98, 1597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Danilovic, N.; Subbaraman, R.; Chang, K.C.; Chang, S.H.; Kang, Y.J.; Snyder, J.; Paulikas, A.P.; Strmcnik, D.; Kim, Y.T.; Myers, D.; et al. Activity-stability trends for the oxygen evolution reaction on monometallic oxides in acidic environments. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2014, 5, 2474–2478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Branco, J.B.; Ferreira, A.C.; Vieira, F.; Martinho, J.F. Cerium-based bimetallic oxides as catalysts for the methanation of CO2: Influence of the preparation method. Energy Fuels 2021, 35, 6725–6737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Anantharaj, S.; Karthick, K.; Kundu, S. Evolution of layered double hydroxides (LDH) as high performance water oxidation electrocatalysts: A review with insights on structure, activity and mechanism. Mater. Today Energy 2017, 6, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, A.; Wang, H.; Zhang, S.; Mao, C.; Song, J.; Niu, H.; Jin, B.; Tian, Y. Controlled synthesis of nickel sulfide/graphene oxide nanocomposite for high-performance supercapacitor. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2013, 282, 704–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Santhosh, N.M.; Upadhyay, K.K.; Strazar, P.; Filipic, G.; Zavasnik, J.; Mao de Ferro, A.; Silva, R.P.; Tatarova, E.; Montemor, M.F.; Cvelbar, U. Advanced carbon-nickel sulfide hybrid nanostructures: Extending the limits of battery-type electrodes for redox-based supercapacitor applications. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2021, 13, 20559–20572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, H.; Wang, J.; Liang, M.; He, Z.; Li, K.; Song, W.; Tian, S.; Duan, W.; Zhao, Y.; Miao, Z. Novel dealloying-fabricated NiS/NiO nanoparticles with superior cycling stability for supercapacitors. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 17999–18007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Huang, H.; Deng, X.; Yan, L.; Wei, G.; Zhou, W.; Liang, X.; Guo, J. One-step synthesis of self-supported Ni3S2/NiS composite film on Ni foam by electrodeposition for high-performance supercapacitors. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Lin, J.-Y.; Tai, S.-Y.; Chou, S.-W. Bifunctional one-dimensional hierarchical nanostructures composed of cobalt sulfide nanoclusters on carbon nanotubes backbone for dye-sensitized solar cells and supercapacitors. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 118, 823–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Luo, Y.; Yang, C.; Tian, Y.; Tang, Y.; Yin, X.; Que, W. A long cycle life asymmetric supercapacitor based on advanced nickel-sulfide/titanium carbide (MXene) nanohybrid and MXene electrodes. J. Power Sources 2020, 450, 227694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Shombe, G.B.; Khan, M.D.; Zequine, C.; Zhao, C.; Gupta, R.K.; Revaprasadu, N. Direct solvent free synthesis of bare alpha-NiS, beta-NiS and alpha-beta-NiS composite as excellent electrocatalysts: Effect of self-capping on supercapacitance and overall water splitting activity. Sci Rep. 2020, 10, 3260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jiang, N.; Tang, Q.; Sheng, M.; You, B.; Jiang, D.-E.; Sun, Y. Nickel sulfides for electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution under alkaline conditions: A case study of crystalline NiS, NiS2, and Ni3S2 nanoparticles. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2016, 6, 1077–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tang, J.; Ni, S.; Chao, D.; Liu, J.; Yang, X.; Zhao, J. High-rate and ultra-stable Na-ion storage for Ni3S2 nanoarrays via self-adaptive pseudocapacitance. Electrochim. Acta 2018, 265, 709–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Darezereshki, E.; Vakylabad, A.B.; Hassanzadeh, A.; Niedoba, T.; Surowiak, A.; Koohestani, B. Hydrometallurgical synthesis of nickel nano-sulfides from spent lithium-ion batteries. Minerals 2021, 11, 419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lai, C.-H.; Huang, K.-W.; Cheng, J.-H.; Lee, C.-Y.; Lee, W.-F.; Huang, C.-T.; Hwang, B.-J.; Chen, L.-J. Oriented growth of large-scale nickel sulfide nanowire arrays via a general solution route for lithium-ion battery cathode applications. J. Mater. Chem. 2009, 19, 7277–7283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhu, X.; Wen, Z.; Gu, Z.; Huang, S. Room-temperature mechanosynthesis of Ni3S2 as cathode material for rechargeable lithium polymer batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2006, 153, A504–A507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Takeuchi, T.; Sakaebe, H.; Kageyama, H.; Sakai, T.; Tatsumi, K. Preparation of NiS2 using spark-plasma-sintering process and its electrochemical properties. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2008, 155, A679–A684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chou, S.-W.; Lin, J.-Y. Cathodic Deposition of flaky nickel sulfide nanostructure as an electroactive material for high-performance supercapacitors. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2013, 160, D178–D182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Krishnamoorthy, K.; Gk, V.; Radhakrishnan, S.; Kim, S. Corrigendum to “One pot hydrothermal growth of hierarchical nanostructured Ni3S2 on Ni foam for supercapacitor application” [Chem. Eng. J. 251 (2014) 116–122]. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 266, 386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Ding, D.; Gao, Y. Controllable synthesis of three-dimensional beta-NiS nanostructured assembly for hybrid-type asymmetric supercapacitors. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Hu, Q.; Zhang, S.; Zou, X.; Hao, J.; Bai, Y.; Yan, L.; Li, W. Coordination agent-dominated phase control of nickel sulfide for high-performance hybrid supercapacitor. J. Colloid. Interface Sci. 2021, 607, 45–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sajjad, M.; Khan, Y. Rational design of self-supported Ni3S2 nanoparticles as a battery type electrode material for high-voltage (1.8 V) symmetric supercapacitor applications. Cryst. Eng. Commun. 2021, 23, 2869–2879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wu, Z.; Huang, H.; Xiong, W.; Yang, S.; Huang, H.; Zou, Y.; Zhou, W.; Cheng, Z.; Wang, J.; Luo, G. One-pot synthesis of glucose-derived carbon coated Ni3S2 nanowires as a battery-type electrode for high performance supercapacitors. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Phonsuksawang, P.; Khajondetchairit, P.; Ngamchuea, K.; Butburee, T.; Sattayaporn, S.; Chanlek, N.; Suthirakun, S.; Siritanon, T. Enhancing performance of NiCo2S4/Ni3S2 supercapacitor electrode by Mn doping. Electrochim. Acta 2021, 368, 137634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Shinde, N.M.; Xia, Q.X.; Shinde, P.V.; Yun, J.M.; Mane, R.S.; Kim, K.H. Sulphur source-inspired self-grown 3D NixSy nanostructures and their electrochemical supercapacitors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 4551–4559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Vidhya, M.S.; Ravi, G.; Yuvakkumar, R.; Velauthapillai, D.; Thambidurai, M.; Dang, C.; Saravanakumar, B. Nickel–cobalt hydroxide: A positive electrode for supercapacitor applications. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 19410–19418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kumar, R.; Singh, R.K.; Savu, R.; Dubey, P.K.; Kumar, P.; Moshkalev, S.A. Microwave-assisted synthesis of void-induced graphene-wrapped nickel oxide hybrids for supercapacitor applications. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 26612–26620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Vishnukumar, P.; Saravanakumar, B.; Ravi, G.; Ganesh, V.; Guduru, R.K.; Yuvakkumar, R. Synthesis and characterization of NiO/Ni3V2O8 nanocomposite for supercapacitor applications. Mater. Lett. 2018, 219, 114–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Anil Kumar, Y.; Dasha Kumar, K.; Kim, H.J. A novel electrode for supercapacitors: Efficient PVP-assisted synthesis of Ni3S2 nanostructures grown on Ni foam for energy storage. Dalton Trans. 2020, 49, 4050–4059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Wu, B.; Qian, H.; Nie, Z.; Luo, Z.; Wu, Z.; Liu, P.; He, H.; Wu, J.; Chen, S.; Zhang, F. Ni3S2 nanorods growing directly on Ni foam for all-solid-state asymmetric supercapacitor and efficient overall water splitting. J. Energy Chem. 2020, 46, 178–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chen, F.; Wang, H.; Ji, S.; Linkov, V.; Wang, R. Core-shell structured Ni3S2@Co(OH)2 nano-wires grown on Ni foam as binder-free electrode for asymmetric supercapacitors. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 345, 48–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, X.; Shi, B.; Fang, Y.; Rong, F.; Huang, F.; Que, R.; Shao, M. High capacitance and rate capability of a Ni3S2@CdS core–shell nanostructure supercapacitor. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 7165–7172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wang, J.; Chao, D.; Liu, J.; Li, L.; Lai, L.; Lin, J.; Shen, Z. Ni3S2@MoS2 Core/shell nanorod arrays on Ni foam for high-performance electrochemical energy storage. Nano Energy 2014, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Liu, X.X.; Wu, R.; Wang, Y.; Xiao, S.H.; He, Q.; Niu, X.B.; Blackwood, D.J.; Chen, J.S. Self-supported core/shell Co3O4@Ni3S2 nanowires for high-performance supercapacitors. Electrochim. Acta 2019, 311, 221–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Tronganh, N.; Gao, Y.; Jiang, W.; Tao, H.; Wang, S.; Zhao, B.; Jiang, Y.; Chen, Z.; Jiao, Z. Hierarchically assembled 3D nanoflowers and 0D nanoparticles of nickel sulfides on reduced graphene oxide with excellent lithium storage performances. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 439, 386–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Tian, Y.; Wang, Q.; Peng, Z.; Guan, S.; Fu, X. Ni Foam-supported tin oxide nanowall array: An integrated supercapacitor anode. Molecules 2021, 26, 4517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Yuan, R.; Jiang, M.; Gao, S.; Wang, Z.; Wang, H.; Boczkaj, G.; Liu, Z.; Ma, J.; Li, Z. 3D mesoporous α-Co(OH)2 nanosheets electrodeposited on nickel foam: A new generation of macroscopic cobalt-based hybrid for peroxymonosulfate activation. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 380, 122447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Yang, H.; Long, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Zhao, Z.; Ma, P.; Jin, J.; Ma, J. Crystal lattice distortion in ultrathin Co(OH)2nanosheets inducing elongated Co–OOH bonds for highly efficient oxygen evolution reaction. Green Chem. 2017, 19, 5809–5817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhang, J.; Lin, J.; Wu, J.; Xu, R.; Lai, M.; Gong, C.; Chen, X.; Zhou, P. Excellent electrochemical performance hierarchical Co3O4@Ni3S2 core/shell nanowire arrays for asymmetric supercapacitors. Electrochim. Acta 2016, 207, 87–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zhang, X.; Zhang, S.; Li, J.; Wang, E. One-step synthesis of well-structured NiS-Ni2P2S6 nanosheets on nickel foam for efficient overall water splitting. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 22131–22136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhou, Y.; Li, T.; Xi, S.; He, C.; Yang, X.; Wu, H. One-step synthesis of self-standing Ni3S2/Ni2P heteronanorods on nickel foam for efficient electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution over a wide pH range. Chem. Cat. Chem. 2018, 10, 5487–5495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Jing, F.; Lv, Q.; Xiao, J.; Wang, Q.; Wang, S. Highly active and dual-function self-supported multiphase NiS–NiS2–Ni3S2/NF electrodes for overall water splitting. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 14207–14214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Deng, S.; Zhang, K.; Xie, D.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wu, J.; Wang, X.; Fan, H.J.; Xia, X.; et al. Correction to: High-index-faceted Ni3S2 branch arrays as bifunctional electrocatalysts for efficient water splitting. Nanomicro Lett. 2020, 13, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Fu, Z.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Qin, Q. Electrochemical reaction of nanocrystalline Co3O4 thin film with Lithium. Solid State Ion. 2004, 170, 105–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wang, Y.; Hao, J.; Li, W.; Zuo, X.; Xiang, B.; Qiang, Y.; Zou, X.; Tan, B.; Hu, Q.; Chen, F. Mn3O4/Co(OH)2 cactus-type nanoarrays for high-energy-density asymmetric supercapacitors. J. Mater. Sci. 2019, 55, 724–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Petitto, S.C.; Marsh, E.M.; Carson, G.A.; Langell, M.A. Cobalt oxide surface chemistry: The interaction of CoO(100), Co3O4(110) and Co3O4(111) with oxygen and water. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2008, 281, 49–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Sayeed, M.A.; Herd, T.; O’Mullane, A.P. Direct electrochemical formation of nanostructured amorphous Co(OH)2 on gold electrodes with enhanced activity for the oxygen evolution reaction. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 991–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Shackery, I.; Patil, U.; Pezeshki, A.; Shinde, N.M.; Im, S.; Jun, S.C. Enhanced Non-enzymatic amperometric sensing of glucose using Co(OH)2 nanorods deposited on a three dimensional graphene network as an electrode material. Microchim. Acta 2016, 183, 2473–2479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wang, J.; Xie, T.; Deng, Q.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, Q.; Liu, S. Three-dimensional interconnected Co(OH)2 nanosheets on Ti mesh as a highly sensitive electrochemical sensor for hydrazine detection. New J. Chem. 2019, 43, 3218–3225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Feng, S.; Liu, C.; Chai, Z.; Li, Q.; Xu, D. Cobalt-based hydroxide nanoparticles @ N-doping carbonic frameworks core–shell structures as highly efficient bifunctional electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution and oxygen reduction reactions. Nano Res. 2018, 11, 1482–1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Li, H.B.; Yu, M.H.; Lu, X.H.; Liu, P.; Liang, Y.; Xiao, J.; Tong, Y.X.; Yang, G.W. Amorphous cobalt hydroxide with superior pseudocapacitive performance. ACS Appl. Mater Interfaces 2014, 6, 745–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kandula, S.; Shrestha, K.R.; Kim, N.H.; Lee, J.H. Fabrication of a 3D hierarchical sandwich Co9S8 /alpha-MnS@N-C@MoS2 nanowire architectures as advanced electrode material for high performance hybrid supercapacitors. Small 2018, 14, e1800291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ye, L.; Zhao, L.; Zhang, H.; Zan, P.; Gen, S.; Shi, W.; Han, B.; Sun, H.; Yang, X.; Xu, T. Serpent-cactus-like Co-doped Ni(OH)2/Ni3S2 hierarchical structure composed of ultrathin nanosheets for use in efficient asymmetric supercapacitors. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 1603–1613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ali Akbari, M.S.; Bagheri, R.; Song, Z.; Najafpour, M.M. Oxygen-evolution reaction by nickel/nickel oxide interface in the presence of ferrate(VI). Sci Rep. 2020, 10, 8757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Yadav, N.; Yadav, N.; Singh, M.K.; Hashmi, S.A. Nonaqueous, redox-active gel polymer electrolyte for high-performance supercapacitor. Energy Technol. 2019, 7, 1900132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. He, L.; Wang, Y.; Xu, Y.; Cai, W.; Zhu, M.; Wang, H. Facile synthesis of core-shell NiSe@α-Ni(OH)2 as battery-type electrode for high-performance hybrid supercapacitor. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 876, 160164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Wang, S.; Xu, L.; Lu, W. Synergistic effect: Hierarchical Ni3S2@Co(OH)2 heterostructure as efficient bifunctional electrocatalyst for overall water splitting. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 457, 156–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Li, W.; Wang, S.; Xin, L.; Wu, M.; Lou, X. Single-crystal β-NiS nanorod arrays with a hollow-structured Ni3S2 framework for supercapacitor applications. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 7700–7709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Yilmaz, G.; Lu, X. Direct growth of 3D hierarchical porous Ni3S2 nanostructures on nickel foam for high-Performance supercapacitors. ChemNanoMat 2016, 2, 719–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Lin, H.; Liu, F.; Wang, X.; Ai, Y.; Yao, Z.; Chu, L.; Han, S.; Zhuang, X. Graphene-coupled flower-like Ni3S2 for a free-standing 3D aerogel with an ultra-high electrochemical capacity. Electrochim. Acta 2016, 191, 705–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Zhuo, M.; Zhang, P.; Chen, Y.; Li, Q. Facile construction of graphene-like Ni3S2 nanosheets through the hydrothermally assisted sulfurization of nickel foam and their application as self-supported electrodes for supercapacitors. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 25446–25449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Yang, J.; Guo, W.; Li, D.; Wei, C.; Fan, H.; Wu, L.; Zheng, W. Synthesis and electrochemical performances of novel hierarchical flower-like nickel sulfide with tunable number of composed nanoplates. J. Power Sources 2014, 268, 113–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Liu, D.; Zhao, X.; Su, R.; Hao, Z.; Jia, B.; Li, S.; Dong, L. Highly porous graphitic activated carbons from lignite via microwave pretreatment and iron-catalyzed graphitization at low-temperature for supercapacitor electrode materials. Processes 2019, 7, 300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Wei, W.; Cui, X.; Chen, W.; Ivey, D.G. Manganese oxide-based materials as electrochemical supercapacitor electrodes. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 1697–1721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Zhuoqing, C.; Li, T.; Li, G.; Wang, K. One-pot in-situ synthesis of Ni(OH)2–NiFe2O4 nanosheet arrays on nickel foam as binder-free electrodes for supercapacitors. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2019, 30, 600–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Li, R.; Wang, S.; Huang, Z.; Lu, F.; He, T. NiCo2S4@Co(OH)2 core-shell nanotube arrays in situ grown on Ni foam for high performances asymmetric supercapacitors. J. Power Sources 2016, 312, 156–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Zhang, F.; Zhang, T.; Yang, X.; Zhang, L.; Leng, K.; Huang, Y.; Chen, Y. A high-performance supercapacitor-battery hybrid energy storage device based on graphene-enhanced electrode materials with ultrahigh energy density. Energy Environ. Sci. 2013, 6, 1623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Jiang, G.; Zhang, M.; Li, X.; Gao, H. NiMoO4@Ni(OH)2 core/shell nanorods supported on Ni foam for high-performance supercapacitors. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 69365–69370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Tian, W.; Wang, X.; Zhi, C.; Zhai, T.; Liu, D.; Zhang, C.; Golberg, D.; Bando, Y. Ni(OH)2 nanosheet @ Fe2O3 nanowire hybrid composite arrays for high-performance supercapacitor electrodes. Nano Energy 2013, 2, 754–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Xu, T.; Wang, Z.; Wang, G.; Lu, L.; Liu, S.; Gao, S.; Xu, H.; Yu, Z. One-pot synthesis of a CoS-AC electrode in a redox electrolyte for high-performance supercapacitors. J. Appl. Electrochem. 2019, 49, 1069–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Cevik, E.; Bozkurt, A. Design of high-performance flexible symmetric supercapacitors energized by redox-mediated hydrogels including metal-doped acidic polyelectrolyte. Int. J. Energy Res. 2020, 44, 4309–4320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Baasanjav, E.; Bandyopadhyay, P.; Cho, J.S.; Jeong, S.M. Hierarchical MCo2O4@Ni(OH)2 (M = Zn or Mn) core@shell architectures as electrode materials for asymmetric solid-state supercapacitors. J. Energy Storage. 2021, 44, 103345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Li, J.-J.; Hu, Y.-X.; Liu, M.-C.; Kong, L.-B.; Hu, Y.-M.; Han, W.; Luo, Y.-C.; Kang, L. Mechanical alloying synthesis of Ni3S2 nanoparticles as electrode material for pseudocapacitor with excellent performances. J. Alloys Compd. 2016, 656, 138–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Li, R.; Wang, S.; Wang, J.; Huang, Z. Ni3S2@CoS core-shell nano-triangular pyramid arrays on Ni foam for high-performance supercapacitors. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 16434–16442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Dai, C.S.; Chien, P.Y.; Lin, J.Y.; Chou, S.W.; Wu, W.K.; Li, P.H.; Wu, K.Y.; Lin, T.W. Hierarchically structured Ni3S2/carbon nanotube composites as high performance cathode materials for asymmetric supercapacitors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 12168–12174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Zhao, H.; Wang, J.; Sui, Y.; Wei, F.; Qi, J.; Meng, Q.; Ren, Y.; He, Y. Construction of layered C@MnNiCo–OH/Ni3S2 core–shell heterostructure with enhanced electrochemical performance for asymmetric supercapacitor. J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron. 2021, 32, 11145–11157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Long, L.; Yao, Y.; Yan, M.; Wang, H.; Zhang, G.; Kong, M.; Yang, L.; Liao, X.; Yin, G.; Huang, Z. Ni3S2@polypyrrole composite supported on nickel foam with improved rate capability and cycling durability for asymmetric supercapacitor device applications. J. Mater. Sci. 2016, 52, 3642–3656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Ye, B.; Gong, C.; Huang, M.; Ge, J.; Fan, L.; Lin, J.; Wu, J. A high-performance asymmetric supercapacitor based on Ni3S2-coated NiSe arrays as positive electrode. New J. Chem. 2019, 43, 2389–2399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Qian, H.; Wu, B.; Nie, Z.; Liu, T.; Liu, P.; He, H.; Wu, J.; Chen, Z.; Chen, S. A flexible Ni3S2/Ni@CC electrode for high-performance battery-like supercapacitor and efficient oxygen evolution reaction. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 420, 127646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nanomaterials 12 00034 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of hydrothermal Ni3S2 and Co(OH)2–Ni3S2 production.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of hydrothermal Ni3S2 and Co(OH)2–Ni3S2 production.
Nanomaterials 12 00034 g001
Nanomaterials 12 00034 g002 550
Figure 2. XRD patterns of the (a) N3S2, (b) Co0.3–Ni3S2, (c) Co0.4–Ni3S2, (d) Co0.5–Ni3S2, and (e) Co0.6–Ni3S2 electrodes.
Figure 2. XRD patterns of the (a) N3S2, (b) Co0.3–Ni3S2, (c) Co0.4–Ni3S2, (d) Co0.5–Ni3S2, and (e) Co0.6–Ni3S2 electrodes.
Nanomaterials 12 00034 g002
Nanomaterials 12 00034 g003 550
Figure 3. FE-SEM images at different magnifications and EDS mapping of (a) NF, (b) Ni3S2, (c) Co0.3–Ni3S2, (d) Co0.4–Ni3S2, (e) Co0.6–Ni3S2, (f) Co0.6–Ni3S2, (g) Ni3S2, and (h) Co0.5–Ni3S2.
Figure 3. FE-SEM images at different magnifications and EDS mapping of (a) NF, (b) Ni3S2, (c) Co0.3–Ni3S2, (d) Co0.4–Ni3S2, (e) Co0.6–Ni3S2, (f) Co0.6–Ni3S2, (g) Ni3S2, and (h) Co0.5–Ni3S2.
Nanomaterials 12 00034 g003
Nanomaterials 12 00034 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) Low and (b) high-magnification TEM images of the Co0.5–Ni3S2 nanowire, (c) EDS mapping images, (d) lattice-resolved HRTEM image of the Co0.5–Ni3S2 nanowire, and (e) SAED pattern of the Co0.5–Ni3S2 nanowire.
Figure 4. (a) Low and (b) high-magnification TEM images of the Co0.5–Ni3S2 nanowire, (c) EDS mapping images, (d) lattice-resolved HRTEM image of the Co0.5–Ni3S2 nanowire, and (e) SAED pattern of the Co0.5–Ni3S2 nanowire.
Nanomaterials 12 00034 g004
Nanomaterials 12 00034 g005 550
Figure 5. XPS spectra of the Co0.5–Ni3S2 electrode. (a) Survey, (b) Ni 2p, (c) Co 2p, and (d) O 1s electron XPS spectra.
Figure 5. XPS spectra of the Co0.5–Ni3S2 electrode. (a) Survey, (b) Ni 2p, (c) Co 2p, and (d) O 1s electron XPS spectra.
Nanomaterials 12 00034 g005
Nanomaterials 12 00034 g006 550
Figure 6. Cyclic voltammograms of (a) different electrodes at 5 mV s−1, (b) Co0.5–Ni3S2 at different scan rates, (c) galvanostatic charge–discharge of Co0.5–Ni3S2 electrode, (d) specific capacitances and capacities, (e) area capacitances and capacities, and (f) cycling performances at 20 mA cm−2.
Figure 6. Cyclic voltammograms of (a) different electrodes at 5 mV s−1, (b) Co0.5–Ni3S2 at different scan rates, (c) galvanostatic charge–discharge of Co0.5–Ni3S2 electrode, (d) specific capacitances and capacities, (e) area capacitances and capacities, and (f) cycling performances at 20 mA cm−2.
Nanomaterials 12 00034 g006
Nanomaterials 12 00034 g007 550
Figure 7. (a) Cyclic voltammograms of the AC negative electrode at 10–50 mV s−1, (b) galvanostatic charge–discharge curves of the AC electrode at 10–50 mA cm−2, (c) specific capacitances at different current densities, and (d) cycling performance of the AC electrode at 20 mA cm−2.
Figure 7. (a) Cyclic voltammograms of the AC negative electrode at 10–50 mV s−1, (b) galvanostatic charge–discharge curves of the AC electrode at 10–50 mA cm−2, (c) specific capacitances at different current densities, and (d) cycling performance of the AC electrode at 20 mA cm−2.
Nanomaterials 12 00034 g007
Nanomaterials 12 00034 g008 550
Figure 8. Cyclic voltammograms of the Co0.5–Ni3S2//AC device (a) in different voltage windows and (b) at different scan rates. (c) Galvanostatic charge–discharge curves of the Co0.5–Ni3S2//AC device at 8–50 mA cm−2 and (inset) cycle retention at 20 mA cm−2, and (d) EIS and fitting results of the Co0.5–Ni3S2//AC device after 1 and 1000 cycles.
Figure 8. Cyclic voltammograms of the Co0.5–Ni3S2//AC device (a) in different voltage windows and (b) at different scan rates. (c) Galvanostatic charge–discharge curves of the Co0.5–Ni3S2//AC device at 8–50 mA cm−2 and (inset) cycle retention at 20 mA cm−2, and (d) EIS and fitting results of the Co0.5–Ni3S2//AC device after 1 and 1000 cycles.
Nanomaterials 12 00034 g008
Table
Table 1. Comparison of the electrochemical energy storage performances observed in this study with those of previously reported Ni3S2 electrodes.
Table 1. Comparison of the electrochemical energy storage performances observed in this study with those of previously reported Ni3S2 electrodes.
ElectrodesCurrent DensitySpecific or Areal CapacitanceCycle StabilityRef.
Ni3S215 A g−1670 F g−197.4% (2000)[50]
Ni3S2 nanosheet @ Ni3S2 nanorods20.6 A g−1489 F g−189.3% (5000)[51]
Ni3S2 nanoflake50 A cm−22.28 F cm−277% (5000)[52]
Ni3S2 nanoporous1 mA cm−23.42 F cm−2102% (4250)[53]
Ni3S2 nanosheet15 mA cm−21.342 F cm−293.6% (3000)[54]
Ni3S2 nest25 mA cm−2682.9 F g−169% (1000)[55]
Ni3S2 nanowire 20 mA cm−2530.3 F g−1 (6.05 F cm−2)83.7% (1000)This study
Co(OH)2–Ni3S2 nanowire 20 mA cm−2656.2 F g−1 (8.17 F cm−2)95.4% (1000)
Table
Table 2. Comparison of the electrochemical energy storage performance observed in this study with those of previously reported asymmetric devices based on Ni3S2 and AC electrodes [66,79,80,81,82,83,84,85].
Table 2. Comparison of the electrochemical energy storage performance observed in this study with those of previously reported asymmetric devices based on Ni3S2 and AC electrodes [66,79,80,81,82,83,84,85].
ElectrodesEnergy Density (W h kg−1)Power Density (W kg−1)Ref.
rGO–Ni3S2//AC37.19399.9[66]
Ni3S2//AC36400[79]
Ni3S2@CoS//AC23.69268.95[80]
Ni3S2//AC10.01150.12[80]
Ni3S2/MWCNT–NC//AC19.8798[81]
C@MnNiCo–OH/Ni3S2/NF//AC36,000799.95[82]
Ni3S2@PPy//AC17.54179.33[83]
Ni3S2//AC17.73179.32[83]
NiSe/Ni3S2//AC38.7192[84]
(Ni3S2/Ni@CC//AC/CC0.27 W h cm−24.90 W cm−2[85]
Co(OH)2–Ni3S2 nanowire 60.31944.3This study
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, X.L.; Jin, E.M.; Chen, J.; Bandyopadhyay, P.; Jin, B.; Jeong, S.M. Facile In Situ Synthesis of Co(OH)2–Ni3S2 Nanowires on Ni Foam for Use in High-Energy-Density Supercapacitors. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12010034

AMA Style

Wang XL, Jin EM, Chen J, Bandyopadhyay P, Jin B, Jeong SM. Facile In Situ Synthesis of Co(OH)2–Ni3S2 Nanowires on Ni Foam for Use in High-Energy-Density Supercapacitors. Nanomaterials. 2022; 12(1):34. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12010034

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Xuan Liang, En Mei Jin, Jiasheng Chen, Parthasarathi Bandyopadhyay, Bo Jin, and Sang Mun Jeong. 2022. "Facile In Situ Synthesis of Co(OH)2–Ni3S2 Nanowires on Ni Foam for Use in High-Energy-Density Supercapacitors" Nanomaterials 12, no. 1: 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12010034

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop