Next Article in Journal
Bead-Immobilized Multimodal Molecular Beacon-Equipped DNA Machinery for Specific RNA Target Detection: A Prototypical Molecular Nanobiosensor
Next Article in Special Issue
Optical Monitoring of the Biodegradation of Porous and Solid Silicon Nanoparticles
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Electrospinning Parameters on the Microstructure of PVP/TiO2 Nanofibers
Previous Article in Special Issue
Atomic Level Insight into Wetting and Structure of Ag Droplet on Graphene Coated Copper Substrate—Molecular Dynamics versus Experiment
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Morphology and Mechanical Properties of Fossil Diatom Frustules from Genera of Ellerbeckia and Melosira

by
Qiong Li
1,2,*,
Jürgen Gluch
1,*,
Zhongquan Liao
1,*,
Juliane Posseckardt
1,
André Clausner
1,
Magdalena Łępicka
3,
Małgorzata Grądzka-Dahlke
3 and
Ehrenfried Zschech
1,2
1
Fraunhofer Institute for Ceramic Technologies and Systems IKTS, Maria-Reiche-Str. 2, 01109 Dresden, Germany
2
Institute of Physics, Faculty 1, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, Konrad-Zuse-Str. 1, 03044 Cottbus, Germany
3
Institute of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Bialystok University of Technology, Wiejska Str. 45C, 15-531 Bialystok, Poland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2021, 11(6), 1615; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11061615
Submission received: 7 May 2021 / Revised: 17 June 2021 / Accepted: 18 June 2021 / Published: 20 June 2021

Abstract

:
Fossil frustules of Ellerbeckia and Melosira were studied using laboratory-based nano X-ray tomography (nano-XCT), transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). Three-dimensional (3D) morphology characterization using nondestructive nano-XCT reveals the continuous connection of fultoportulae, tube processes and protrusions. The study confirms that Ellerbeckia is different from Melosira. Both genera reveal heavily silicified frustules with valve faces linking together and forming cylindrical chains. For this cylindrical architecture of both genera, valve face thickness, mantle wall thickness and copulae thickness change with the cylindrical diameter. Furthermore, EDS reveals that these fossil frustules contain Si and O only, with no other elements in the percentage concentration range. Nanopores with a diameter of approximately 15 nm were detected inside the biosilica of both genera using TEM. In situ micromechanical experiments with uniaxial loading were carried out within the nano-XCT on these fossil frustules to determine the maximal loading force under compression and to describe the fracture behavior. The fracture force of both genera is correlated to the dimension of the fossil frustules. The results from in situ mechanical tests show that the crack initiation starts either at very thin features or at linking structures of the frustules.

1. Introduction

Natural materials are evolutionary optimized materials that frequently feature hierarchical structures. They play an important role in bionanotechnology and composite materials [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. Diatom biosilica is one of these biological materials, mainly from two sources: diatomaceous earth and living diatoms. Diatoms are unicellular microorganisms with more than hundreds of thousands of species [8]. Their hard and porous wall with a unique 3D morphology is called diatom frustule [9,10,11]. Biosilica from diatom frustules resist disintegration and decay, and therefore, diatom-rich fossil deposits have formed over time at many sites (e.g., oceans, lakes and marshes) [12,13]. This naturally formed diatomaceous earth (or diatomite) is an abundant mineral source and distributes widely on earth [14,15], by which it can be easily obtained at a large scale and at a low cost. During the time of forming fossil frustules (diatomaceous earth), there could be other elements incorporated into the biosilica that become part of the chemical composition. Elemental analysis showed the diatomaceous earth contains a high amount of oxygen (48 wt. %) and silicon (46 wt. %) with a small amount of aluminum (3 wt. %) and iron (3 wt. %), as well as other elements [16]. However, the chemical composition of diatomaceous earth varies from region to region [17,18].
Because fossil frustules are lightweight and their specific mechanical properties have been optimized during evolution [19,20], they could be used as components in composites. So far, the market of lightweight and high-strength composite materials is growing fast [21]. Many metal matrix composites use ceramic particles such as Al2O3, SiC, MO, B4C, and TiC as reinforcing components. Only limited studies exist for SiO2-based composites [22,23,24,25]. To date, few studies have been conducted on the use of fossil frustules as reinforcement components in metal matrix composites (MMCs). Before using fossil frustules as functional materials in MMCs, the morphology and mechanical properties of the selected fossil frustules must be known. However, because the size of most diatom species ranges from 3 µm to 200 µm [26], traditional mechanical test methods struggle to characterize individual frustules. Recently, new approaches on micro- and nanomechanical tests have been developed and used to study the mechanical behavior of frustules [20,27,28,29]. Indentation by atomic force microscopy (AFM) on pennate and centric diatoms showed that the elastic modulus varied from several to hundreds GPa depending on the test locations [27,28]. In situ microindentation, in combination with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) on pennate diatom frustules (Didymosphenia geminata), shows that the applied load to achieve elastic deformation on the epivalve surface ranges from 100 µN to 1000 µN [29]. In three-point bending experiments on the centric diatom (Coscinodiscus sp.), fracture was observed at an average stress of 1.1 GPa [20]. So far, no studies on the mechanical behavior of a whole fossil frustule under compressive load using a flat punch have been published. Such experiments will provide an understanding of the fracture behavior of individual frustules under compression. Only the study from Hamm et al. [30] using glass microneedles to load and break three living species revealed that the force required to break the living diatom is in the range from dozens to hundreds of µN depending on the diameter of diatoms. Furthermore, one of the most critical points for the application of fossil frustules in MMCs is to understand the exact intricate 3D morphologies of the frustules. SEM, also in combination with a focused ion beam (FIB), and AFM, were used to study the morphologies of the diatom frustules [9,10,28,29,31,32]. However, these techniques cannot access the interior structure nondestructively. To achieve the 3D morphology of the fossil frustules and to correlate the structure to the mechanical properties, a combination of nondestructive 3D imaging with in situ micromechanical tests is required.
In this study, the studied fossil frustules from diatomaceous earth belong to the genera of Ellerbeckia and Melosira. All of them are centric diatoms with cylindrical shapes and feature a diameter in the range from 40 µm to 80 µm. Nano-XCT is used to image these frustules and to provide data to reconstruct their 3D structures. Furthermore, in situ mechanical compression tests are combined with nano-XCT imaging to investigate the maximum loading force for the whole fossil frustule and the fracture behavior of individual fossil frustules. To obtain the nanostructure and the chemical composition of the fossil frustules, thin lamellae were prepared by FIB and studied by TEM.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Morphology and Chemical Composition Study

Fossil diatom frustules were taken from diatomaceous earth (Perma-Guard Inc., North Salt Lake, UT, USA, Batch No. 3/9/17305). This diatomaceous earth has a large fraction of complete frustules. The particle density of the fossil frustules in diatomaceous earth determined by the helium pycnometry technique is about 2.23 g/cm3. The bulk density measured by the Hall flowmeter with an aperture of 2.5 mm in diameter is about 0.19 g/cm3. Complete frustules of Ellerbeckia and Melosira were selected for this study. For nano-XCT (Xradia nano-XCT-100, photon energy = 8 keV, Xradia Inc., Pleasanton, CA, USA) experiments, an intact frustule was selected and fixed on the tip of a sample holder. A gold fiducial marker was carefully positioned on top of the frustule for alignment during the tomography and tomographic reconstruction. Individual images were acquired in Zernike phase-contrast mode [33]. The detailed experimental setup of the nano-XCT tool was described in [34]. All imaging was performed in a large field of view of 66.5 × 66.5 µm2 with 512 × 512 pixels per image. The complete tomographic data sets consist of 601 images, collected over 180° (parallel beam geometry) with an exposure time of 230 s per image. The images were aligned using a custom plugin in ImageJ [35] and subsequently reconstructed using the Xradia Inc. (Pleasanton, CA, USA) commercial software package (Xradia XMReconstructor).
For chemical composition analysis and nanostructure characterization of fossil Ellerbeckia and Melosira frustules, TEM lamellae were prepared using a Dual Beam SEM-FIB system (NVision 40, Carl Zeiss AG, Oberkochen, Germany) and imaged using a scanning TEM (Libra 200 MC Cs, Carl Zeiss AG, Oberkochen, Germany) at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. Element mapping of the lamellae was performed using energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) in the TEM.

2.2. Micromechanical Behavior Study

In situ micromechanical compression tests were performed inside the nano-XCT system with an in-house-developed micromechanical test setup [36]. For the mechanical testing, a single fossil frustule from genera of Ellerbeckia and Melosira was selected and compressed between two flat surfaces (bottom: steel sample holder, top: diamond flat punch) by stepwise increasing loads. The loading force was determined and a radiograph with a 60 s exposure time was recorded at each step. Tomographies were acquired before and after the compression test. The full tomography before the indentation test was used to verify the integrity of the sample. The tomography data acquired after the indentation test were to evaluate the 3D crack pattern. All tomographies of the samples from mechanical tests consist of 401 images collected during 180° rotation with an exposure time of 120 s for each image.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Morphology and Chemical Composition Study

Nano-XCT data of a fossil frustule from Ellerbeckia with a cylindrical shape and a diameter of about 60 µm are shown in Figure 1. It is found from reconstructed 3D data of the Ellerbeckia frustule that there are fultoportulae on the surface of the mantle wall, crossing through the mantle wall and forming protrusions inside the frustule wall (Figure 1a,c,d and Figure 2a). Light microscopy (LM) and SEM images show the morphology of the protrusions on the surface wall (Figure S1a) and at the inside of the frustule wall (Figure S1b,c). Furthermore, the 3D rendering of the frustule in girdle view (Figure 1f) shows a pseudosulcus (white arrow) at the rims of the two valve faces and a linking region of the epivalve and hypovalve (orange arrow). By virtually unrolling the cylinder wall of Ellerbeckia (Figure 2a), a flat view of the cylindrical wall shows the external openings of fultoportulae (red arrow), the linking region of the valve faces (white arrow) and the region linking the epivalve and hypovalve (orange arrow). With a higher magnification of the linking region of the valve faces, interlocking series of ridges and grooves (black arrows) on the valve are observed (Figure 2b). Applying fast Fourier transform (FFT) analysis on the unrolled wall (red square area in Figure 2a), pores arranged in a periodic rhombus geometry with around an 83° angle are revealed for this specific Ellerbeckia frustule (cylindrical diameter: 63 µm). However, the frustule with a cylindrical diameter of 60 µm shows an angle of 71° (Figure S2). These data demonstrate the wide variability of the structural parameters of the frustules [32]. The average distance between two pores is about 0.6 µm, and the pore size is about 0.1 µm in diameter.
Nano-XCT images of a Melosira frustule with a cylindrical diameter of about 45 µm are shown in Figure 3. Radial striae are found on the valve faces (Figure 3a, white arrow), and tube processes (Figure 3b, red arrows) are distributed through the mantle wall. Melosira in girdle view (Figure 3c) shows the corresponding morphology of the two linked valve faces (white arrow) and a linking region of the epivalve and hypovalve (orange arrow). Figure 3d again shows the flat view of the unrolled cylindrical surface wall with distinguished striae extending from the valve face to the mantle area (red arrows), the linking region of the valve faces (white arrow) and the region to link the epivalve and hypovalve (orange arrow). However, the pores here do not form a pattern as in the frustules of Ellerbeckia (Figure 2 and Figure S3). Exploring from the surface to the interior of the unrolled wall, a few protrusions (red arrows in Figure 3e) at the inside of the frustule wall are visible.
The study of Crawford and Sims [37] shows the species from the genus of Ellerbeckia are different from the species from the genus of Melosira. Although the species from the genus of Ellerbeckia are still under the name of genus of Melosira in the Algaebase database [38,39,40], the morphological features derived from Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3 specifically show that Ellerbeckia is a different genus than Melosira. For example, between the two frustules of Ellerbeckia, there is a pronounced pseudosulcus (Figure 1f) and an interlocking series of ridges and grooves on the outer rim of the valve faces (Figure 2b), while for the Melosira frustules, there are special structures to link the two valve faces together (Figure 3c) with no pseudosulcus. The mantle wall of Ellerbeckia is evenly thick with external openings of fultoportulae and sharp protrusions inside (red arrows in Figure 1), while the mantle wall of Melosira is unevenly thick with blunt and fewer protrusions at the inside wall (red arrows in Figure 3b,e). Although there are different morphologies, the images of both the Ellerbeckia and Melosira frustules show typical heavily silicified frustules with thick frustule walls. Moreover, both genera form a cylindrical shape with the valve faces linking together to form chains (Figure 1e,f, Figure 3c, Figures S1a and S5a) [37,38,39,40,41]. Tube processes are present in the mantle wall of these frustules. (Figure 1a,c and Figure 3b), and they form protrusions at the inside wall (Figure 1d and Figure 3e). However, due to the limited resolution, no information about the nanostructure inside the biosilica is provided by nano-XCT imaging. Therefore, thin lamellae of three different fossil frustules were prepared by FIB and imaged by TEM: (i) valvocopula, (ii) linking region of the two valve faces and (iii) the center of the valve face. Additionally, EDS mapping was performed to analyze the chemical composition of these fossil frustules.
Figure 4a shows the TEM images of the valvocopula of Ellerbeckia. The substructure of this region is shown in Figure 4b. In that area, nanopores with a diameter of about 15 nm are found (Figure 4b). EDX (Figure 4c) shows that the frustule in this region contains only O and Si, i.e., SiO2. (Figure S4c). TEM imaging of Melosira in the linking region of the two valve faces shows tube processes under the radial striae of the valve surface (Figure 4d, red arrows) and a special structure (Figure 4d, black arrows) to link the two valve faces, also shown in Figure 3c (white arrow) by nano-XCT imaging. Nanopores with a diameter of about 15 nm are also found in this area (Figure 4e, green arrows). Composition analysis of the red area in Figure 4d shows again that the frustule material of the investigated sample contains pure Si and O (Figure 4f). The valve face center of Ellerbeckia also has nanopores with a diameter of about 15 nm and has the same chemical composition (Figure S6). The EDS study in the TEM shows only Si and O without other elements (or beyond the detection limit of about 0.1 wt. %) in fossil frustules, which proves that the source is very pure, similar to the frustules from the cultured diatoms [20,29].

3.2. Uniaxial Static Compression Test of Fossil Frustules

In situ uniaxial compression tests (Figure 5) were performed by a nanomechanical test device integrated into nano-XCT. More details of the setup are provided in [36,42]. As shown in Figure 5a, the whole compression setup allows acquiring radiographs from a large tilt range for limited-angle tomography. The compression setup consists of a piezomechanical actuator, a force gauge and two anvils. In this study, a diamond flat punch was used as the upper anvil.
The compression tests were carried out on either the whole valve face or on the copulae area to determine the maximal loading force (Fmax) and to understand the crack initiation of these individual fossil frustules (Figure 6, Table 1). Figure 6(1), (2) and (4) represent the compression test on the valve face for Ellerbeckia frustules and the Melosira frustule, with cylindrical diameters of 80 µm, 69.5 µm and 46 µm, respectively. Figure 6a of these frustules shows the samples under load before any cracks happen. Figure 6b,c of the Ellerbeckia frustule Figure 6(1) are two views from perpendicular directions of the broken frustule. The crack of these three frustules started from the linking region of the epivalve and hypovalve (Figure 6b, white arrows), and their maximum loading forces under compression are 82.2 mN, 45.2 mN and 20.6 mN, respectively. For the Ellerbeckia frustule Figure 6(2), a part of the hypovalve (Figure 6(2)b, red arrow) started to break right after the crack initiation. It then cracked further, and the whole hypovalve shattered (Figure 6(2)c). For the Melosira frustule Figure 6(4), a total collapse (Figure 6(4)c, red arrows) took place at the initial crack region under Fmax.
Figure 6(3) shows the compression test on the copulae area of an Ellerbeckia frustule with a cylindrical diameter of 62.5 µm. Here, the frustule started to crack at the right side in the valve face (Figure 6b, white arrows), and a small collapse took place here (Figure 6(3)d). As force increased, a large crack was observed (Figure 6(3)b, red arrow), and then the whole diatom shattered from the valve faces of both sides (Figure 6(3)c, orange arrows) under the maximum loading force of 44.1 mN (Figure 6(3)d, Table 1).
The results from compression tests (Figure 6 and Figure 7b) show that the maximal force is related to the cylindrical diameter of the frustules. For these specific fossil frustules from genera of Ellerbeckia and Melosira, Fmax decreases as the structure geometry of these frustules decreases (Table 1, Figure 7b). Hamm et al. [30] revealed that loading force and size were inversely related not only within the same species of Thalassiosira punctigera but also between different genera (Coscinodiscus and Fragilariopsis). However, the reason behind the loading force–size tendency was not clearly stated in that study. In order to understand why the maximal loading force decreases as the cylindrical diameter of the fossil frustules decreases, the structural parameters of valve thickness, mantle wall thickness and copulae thickness from 3D reconstruction data were measured and compared (Figure 7a, Table 1 and Table 2). The absolute values of valve face thickness and mantle wall thickness from both genera decrease as the cylindrical diameter decreases. However, the ratio of valve face thickness (VFT), mantle thickness (MT) and copulae thickness (CT) to cylindrical diameter (CD) for Ellerbeckia remains constant despite the different diameters.
The radiographs recorded during the compression tests (Figure 6) show that the crack initiates from either the linking region of the epivalve and hypovalve or from the valve face. Average values for the ratios of VFT, MT and CT to CD from Ellerbeckia are 0.029 ± 0.002, 0.042 ± 0.002, and 0.010 ± 0.001, respectively. Among these ratios, MT/CD is larger than VFT/CD and CT/CD, i.e., the weakest points for Ellerbeckia are the valve face and copulae. Figure 6(1–3) shows that the crack starts from the valve face or the linking region of the epivalve and hypovalve, i.e., the copulae. For Melosira (i.e., Frustule 4) with a similar cylindrical architecture compared to Ellerbeckia, the absolute values of valve face thickness and mantle wall thickness are smaller (Table 1 and Table 2). Moreover, VFT/CD increases from 0.029 to 0.035, CT/CD increases from 0.010 to 0.017, while the MT/CD ratio decreases from 0.042 to 0.025. That means, the weak point for Melosira is the region of the mantle wall, i.e., the linking region of the epivalve and hypovalve (Figure 3c, orange arrow). Figure 6(4)b shows that the crack starts exactly from that point (white arrow).
The observed maximum loading force in this study is hundreds of times higher than in the study of Hamm et al. [30]. The reason could be that Ellerbeckia and Melosira are heavily silicified frustules with valve faces linking together to form cylindrical chains, so the 3D morphology is different from Thalassiosira. Thalassiosira is not heavily silicified and does not form a cylindrical chain [43,44]. Additionally, the compression testing here is on fossil frustules, while Hamm et al. performed compression tests on living diatoms. Furthermore, the analysis of 3D reconstruction data of Thalassiosira lacustris in Figure S7 and Table S1, the same genus as Thalassiosira punctigera in the study of Hamm et al., reveals the absolute values of valve thickness, mantle wall thickness and copulae thickness do not increase as the valve diameter increases. These values remain almost constant as the valve diameter decreases.

4. Conclusions

The 3D morphology of fossils, centric frustules (genera: Ellerbeckia and Melosira), was examined using nano-XCT. It was verified that Ellerbeckia is a different genus than Melosira. The studied Ellerbeckia frustules lack striae on the valve faces and feature a pseudosulcus at the rim between two frustules. The mantle wall is evenly thick with pores in rhombic arrangement on the frustule wall. For Melosira frustules, the valve faces are linked by special substructures. The mantle wall is unevenly thick with the thinnest structure on the linking region of the epivalve and hypovalve. Additionally, there are fewer blunt protrusions inside the mantle wall of the Melosira frustules. However, the 3D morphology of both Ellerbeckia and Melosira frustules is cylindrical in shape, and the diatom cells are connected to each other by their valve faces. EDS studies confirm that fossil frustules of both genera contain Si and O only, with no other elements with a concentration above the detection limit of 0.1 wt. %. TEM imaging reveals nanopores with a size of about 15 nm distributed almost everywhere inside the biosilica.
In situ micromechanical experiments with uniaxial loading were carried out within a nano-XCT tool to determine the mechanical properties of the individual fossil frustule. For these heavily silicified fossil frustules, with similar cylindrical architecture and chemical composition, the maximum loading force is related to the dimension of the fossil frustule. Analysis of the morphological parameters shows that the absolute values of VFT, MT and CT decrease as the cylindrical diameter decreases for both genera, except for the CT of Melosira. The average values of the ratios VFT/CD, CT/CD and MT/CD and the results from mechanical compression tests indicate the valve face, as well as the linking region of the epivalve and hypovalve as weak spots. Together with the compression force data, a relationship between the maximum applicable force inducing crack initiation and the size of the fossil frustules is provided. This information might enlighten the studies when using the fossil frustules for functional materials design, e.g., as a filler material in lightweight metal matrix composites.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nano11061615/s1, Figure S1: Light microscopy (LM) and SEM imaging of the Ellerbeckia frustules, Figure S2: Data analysis of the Ellerbeckia mantle wall with a cylindrical diameter of 60 µm, Figure S3: FFT analysis of the unrolled surface wall of the Melosira frustule, Figure S4: Chemical composition analysis of Ellerbeckia in the area of the valvocopula, Figure S5: LM and SEM imaging of the Melosira frustule, Figure S6: TEM imaging and EDX of Ellerbeckia in the center of the intaglio valve face, Figure S7: Nano-XCT images of Thalassiosira lacustris, Table S1: Structure parameters of the frustules from Thalassiosira lacustris.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Q.L., Z.L. and J.G.; data curation, Q.L., J.G., Z.L. and J.P.; formal analysis, Q.L., J.G., Z.L. and A.C.; funding acquisition: J.G. and E.Z.; investigation, Q.L., J.G., Z.L. and E.Z.; methodology, Q.L., J.G., Z.L. and J.P.; project administration: J.G., E.Z., M.Ł. and M.G.-D.; resource, M.Ł. and M.G.-D.; supervision: J.G. and E.Z.; visualization: Q.L. and J.G.; writing—original draft preparation, Q.L.; writing—review and editing, Q.L., J.G., Z.L., J.P., A.C., M.Ł., M.G.-D. and E.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research is financially supported by the Federal Ministry of Economic Affairs and Energy on the basis of a resolution of the German Bundestag (Project Mecodia, CORNET, IGF-Nr.: 248EBR).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. This data are not publicly available due to the excessive size and complex format.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge K.J. Kurzydłowski and I. Zgłobicka from Bialystok University of Technology, Poland, as well as B. Jost and P. Krüger from Fraunhofer Institute for Ceramic Technologies and Systems Dresden, Germany, for valuable discussions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kamat, S.; Su, X.; Ballarini, R.; Heuer, A.H. Structural basis for the fracture toughness of the shell of the conch Strombus gigas. Nature 2000, 405, 1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhou, H.; Fan, T.; Zhang, D. Biotemplated materials for sustainable energy and environment: Current status and challenges. ChemSusChem 2011, 4, 1344–1378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Chandrasekaran, S.; Nann, T.; Voelcker, N. Silicon nanowire photocathodes for photoelectrochemical hydrogen production. Nanomaterials 2016, 6, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Gordon, R.; Losic, D.; Tiffany, M.; Nagy, S.; Sterrenburg, F. The glass menagerie: Diatoms for novel applications in nanotechnology. Trends Biotechnol. 2009, 27, 116–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rea, I.; Dardano, P.; Ferrara, A.; Stefano, L. Micro- and nano-optical devices from diatom nanostructure: Light control by mother nature. In Diatom Nanotechnology Progress and Emerging Applications, 1st ed.; Losic, D., Ed.; The Royal Society of Chemistry: London, UK, 2018; pp. 111–123. [Google Scholar]
  6. Pattnayak, A.; Madhu, N.; Panda, A.S.; Sahoo, M.K.; Mohanta, K. A comparative study on mechanical properties of Al-SiO2 composites fabricated using rice husk silica in crystalline and amorphous form as reinforcement. Mater. Today Proc. 2018, 5, 8184–8192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Meindlhumer, M.; Zalesak, J.; Pitonak, R.; Todt, J.; Sartory, B.; Burghammer, M.; Stark, A.; Schell, N.; Daniel, R.; Keckes, J.F.; et al. Biomimetic hard and tough nanoceramic Ti-Al-N film with self-assembled six-level hierarchy. Nanoscale 2019, 11, 7986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Armbrust, E.V. The life of diatoms in the world’s oceans. Nature 2009, 459, 185–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Brzozowska, W.; Sprynskyy, M.; Wojtczak, I.; Dabek, P.; Witkowski, A.; Buszewski, B. “Outsourcing” diatoms in fabrication of metal-doped 3D biosilica. Materials 2020, 13, 2576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Xing, Y.; Yu, L.; Wang, X.; Jia, J.; Liu, Y.; He, J.; Jia, Z. Characterization and analysis of Coscinodiscus genus frustule based on FIB-SEM. Prog. Nat. Sci. Mater. Int. 2017, 27, 391–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zglobicka, I.; Chmielewska, A.; Topal, E.; Kutukova, K.; Gluch, J.; Krüger, P.; Kilroy, C.; Swieszkowski, W.; Kurzydlowski, K.J.; Zschech, E. 3D diatom–designed and selective laser melting (SLM) manufactured metallic structures. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Gurel, A.; Yildiz, A. Diatom communities, lithofacies characteristics and paleo environmental interpretation of Pliocene diatomite deposits in the lhlara–Selime plain (Aksaray, Central Anatolia, Turkey). J. Asian Earth Sci. 2007, 30, 170–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Owen, R.B.; Potts, R.; Behrensmeyer, A.K.; Ditchfield, P. Diatomaceous sediments and environmental change in the Pleistocene Olorgesailie Formation, Southern Kenya Rift Valley. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2008, 269, 17–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Crangle, R.D. Diatomite: U.S. Geological Survey Mineral Commodity Summaries; U.S. Geological Survey: Washington, DC, USA, 2010; pp. 52–53.
  15. Bunch, T.R.; Bond, C.; Buhl, K.; Stone, D. Diatomaceous Earth General Fact Sheet. 2013. Available online: http://npic.orst.edu/factsheets/degen.html (accessed on 25 October 2020).
  16. Lutynski, M.; Sakiewicz, P.; Lutynska, S. Characterization of diatomaceous earth and halloysite resources of Poland. Minerals 2019, 9, 670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Antonides, L.E. Diatomite. USGS. Available online: https://www.usgs.gov/centers/nmic/diatomite-statistics-and-information (accessed on 25 October 2020).
  18. De Namor, A.D.; Elgamouz, A.; Frangie, S.; Martinez, V. Turning the volume down on heavy metals using tuned diatomite. A review of diatomite and modified diatomite for the extraction of heavy metals from water. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 241–242, 14–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hamm, C.E. The evolution of advanced mechanical defenses and potential technological applications of diatom shells. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2005, 5, 108–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Aitken, Z.H.; Luo, S.; Reynolds, S.N.; Thaulow, C.; Greer, J.R. Microstructure provides insights into evolutionary design and resilience of Coscinodiscus sp. frustule. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 2017–2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Mavhungu, S.T.; Akinlabi, E.T.; Onitiri, M.A.; Varachia, F.M. Aluminum matrix composites for industrial use: Advances and trends. Procedia Manuf. 2017, 7, 178–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rizkalla, H.L.; Abdulwahed, A. Some mechanical properties of metal-nonmetal Al-SiO2 particulate composites. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 1996, 56, 398–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sulaiman, S.; Sayuti, M.; Samin, R. Mechanical properties of the as-cast quartz particulate reinforced LM6 alloy matrix composites. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2008, 201, 731–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hashemi, M.; Jamaati, R.; Toroghinejad, M.R. Microstructure and mechanical properties of Al/SiO2 composite produced by CAR process. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2012, 532, 275–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zglobicka, I. Frustules of Didymosphenia geminata as a modifier of resin. Inzynieria Mater. 2018, 1, 10–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Svensson, F.; Norberg, J.; Snoeijs, P. Diatom cell size, coloniality and motility: Trade-offs between temperature, salinity and nutrient supply with climate change. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e109993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Almqvist, N.; Delamo, Y.; Smith, B.L.; Thomson, N.H.; Bartholdson, A.; Lal, R.; Brzezinski, M.; Hansma, P.K. Micromechanical and structural properties of a pennate diatom investigated by atomic force microscopy. J. Microsc. 2001, 202, 518–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Losic, D.; Short, K.; Mitchell, J.G.; Lal, R.; Voelcker, N.H. AFM nanoindentations of diatom biosilica surfaces. Langmuir 2007, 23, 5014–5021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Topal, E.; Rajendran, H.; Zglobicka, I.; Gluch, J.; Liao, Z.; Clausner, A.; Kurzydlowski, J.K.; Zschech, E. Numerical and experimental study of the mechanical response of diatom frustules. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hamm, C.E.; Merkel, R.; Springe, O.; Jurkojc, P.; Maier, C.; Prechtel, K.; Smetacek, V. Architecture and material properties of diatom shells provide effective mechanical protection. Nature 2003, 421, 841–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Chen, L.; Weng, D.; Du, C.; Wang, J.; Cao, S. Contribution of frustules and mucilage trails to the mobility of diatom Navicula sp. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 7342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Zgłobicka, I.; Li, Q.; Gluch, J.; Płocinska, M.; Noga, T.; Dobosz, R.; Szoszkiewicz, R.; Witkowski, A.; Zschech, E.; Kurzydłowski, K.J. Visualization of the internal structure of Didymosphenia geminata frustules using nano X-ray tomography. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 9086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Tkachuk, A.; Duewer, F.; Cui, H.; Feser, M.; Wang, S.; Yun, W. X-ray computed tomography in Zernike phase contrast mode at 8 keV with 50 nm resolution using Cu rotating anode X-ray source. Z. Kristallogr. Cryst. Mater. 2007, 222, 650–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Li, Q.; Gluch, J.; Krüger, P.; Gall, M.; Neinhuis, C.; Zschech, E. Pollen structure visualization using high-resolution laboratory-based hard X-ray tomography. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2016, 479, 272–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Schindelin, J.; Arganda-Carreras, I.; Frise, E.; Kaynig, V.; Longair, M.; Pietzsch, T.; Preibisch, S.; Rueden, C.; Saalfeld, S.; Schmid, B.; et al. Fiji: An open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 676–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Zschech, E.; Löffler, M.; Krüger, P.; Gluch, J.; Kutukova, K.; Zgłobicka, I.; Topal, E. Laboratory computed X-ray tomography–A nondestructive technique for 3D microstructure analyis of materials. Pract. Metallogr. 2018, 55, 539–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Crawford, R.M.; Sims, P.A. Ellerbeckia baileyi (H. L. Smith) Crawford &Sims Comb. Nov.: Typification and frustule morphology of a rare freshwater fossil diatom. Diatom Res. 2007, 22, 17–26. [Google Scholar]
  38. Wolle, F. Diatomaceae of North America; The Commenius Press: Bethlehem, PA, USA, 1890; pp. 15–47. [Google Scholar]
  39. Guiry, M.D.; Guiry, G.M. AlgaeBase. World-Wide Electronic Publication, National University of Ireland, Galway. 2020. Available online: http://www.algaebase.org (accessed on 25 October 2020).
  40. Diatoms of North America. Available online: https://diatoms.org/genera/ellerbeckia (accessed on 25 October 2020).
  41. Diatoms of North America. Available online: https://diatoms.org/genera/melosira (accessed on 25 October 2020).
  42. Kutukova, K. Combination of X-Ray Tomography and In-situ Micro Mechanical Testing of Composites. Master’s Thesis, DIU Dresden International University, Dresden, Germany, 9 December 2015. submission. [Google Scholar]
  43. Park, J.S.; Jung, S.W.; Lee, S.D.; Yun, S.M.; Lee, J.H. Species diversity of the genus Thalassiosira (Thalassiosirales, Bacillariophyta) in South Korea and its biogeographical distribution in the world. Phycologia 2016, 55, 403–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Li, Q.; Gluch, J.; Zschech, E. Laboratory-based high-resolution X-ray tomography for three-dimensional visualizing the natural diatoms. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 2021, 35, S80. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Ellerbeckia frustule studied by nano-XCT. (a,b) Valve view of the frustule, (d,e) girdle view of the frustule and (c,f) 3D rendering of Ellerbeckia in valve view and girdle view, respectively. Red arrows: protrusions, white arrow: pseudosulcus, orange arrows: the region linking the epivalve and hypovalve.
Figure 1. Ellerbeckia frustule studied by nano-XCT. (a,b) Valve view of the frustule, (d,e) girdle view of the frustule and (c,f) 3D rendering of Ellerbeckia in valve view and girdle view, respectively. Red arrows: protrusions, white arrow: pseudosulcus, orange arrows: the region linking the epivalve and hypovalve.
Nanomaterials 11 01615 g001
Figure 2. Data analysis of the Ellerbeckia mantle wall. (a) Part of the unfolded frustule wall, (b) magnified imaging of the morphology of the interlocking series of ridges and grooves (black arrows) on the valve faces, (c) FFT analysis of pores on the frustule wall from the red square area in (a,d) reconstructed outer wall.
Figure 2. Data analysis of the Ellerbeckia mantle wall. (a) Part of the unfolded frustule wall, (b) magnified imaging of the morphology of the interlocking series of ridges and grooves (black arrows) on the valve faces, (c) FFT analysis of pores on the frustule wall from the red square area in (a,d) reconstructed outer wall.
Nanomaterials 11 01615 g002
Figure 3. Nano-XCT images of the Melosira frustule. (a,b) Valve view of the frustule and (c) girdle view of the frustule, unfolded cylindrical wall of the Melosira frustule from the surface (d) to the interior (e).
Figure 3. Nano-XCT images of the Melosira frustule. (a,b) Valve view of the frustule and (c) girdle view of the frustule, unfolded cylindrical wall of the Melosira frustule from the surface (d) to the interior (e).
Nanomaterials 11 01615 g003
Figure 4. TEM imaging and chemical composition analysis of Ellerbeckia (ac) in the area of the valvocopula and Melosira (df) in the linking region of the two valve faces. (a) Image of the region of the valvocopula, (b) image of the green area in (a) at a higher magnification, (c) spectrum of elements in the orange area of (a), (d) image of the linking region of the two valve faces, (e) high-magnification image of the red area in (d) and (f) area spectrum of elements in the red area. Green arrows: nanopores; red arrows: tube processes; black arrows: a special structure to link the two valve faces. Pt and Ga content arises from the FIB preparation, and Cu is from the sample holder.
Figure 4. TEM imaging and chemical composition analysis of Ellerbeckia (ac) in the area of the valvocopula and Melosira (df) in the linking region of the two valve faces. (a) Image of the region of the valvocopula, (b) image of the green area in (a) at a higher magnification, (c) spectrum of elements in the orange area of (a), (d) image of the linking region of the two valve faces, (e) high-magnification image of the red area in (d) and (f) area spectrum of elements in the red area. Green arrows: nanopores; red arrows: tube processes; black arrows: a special structure to link the two valve faces. Pt and Ga content arises from the FIB preparation, and Cu is from the sample holder.
Nanomaterials 11 01615 g004
Figure 5. In situ compression test in nano-XCT. (a) Schematic diagram of the compression loading on the frustule inside the nano-XCT system and (b) photo of the compression loading sample stage, red arrow: pin with sample.
Figure 5. In situ compression test in nano-XCT. (a) Schematic diagram of the compression loading on the frustule inside the nano-XCT system and (b) photo of the compression loading sample stage, red arrow: pin with sample.
Nanomaterials 11 01615 g005
Figure 6. In situ mechanical compression tests on studying the mechanical behavior of the four different fossil frustules (14). (ac) Radiographs recorded during the mechanical test and (d) corresponding load-displacement curves. The enlarged data points in (d) correspond to the radiographs in (ac). Dashed lines are a guide for the eye.
Figure 6. In situ mechanical compression tests on studying the mechanical behavior of the four different fossil frustules (14). (ac) Radiographs recorded during the mechanical test and (d) corresponding load-displacement curves. The enlarged data points in (d) correspond to the radiographs in (ac). Dashed lines are a guide for the eye.
Nanomaterials 11 01615 g006
Figure 7. Diagrams of the studied fossil frustules. (a) Schematic diagram of studied fossil frustules with two diatom cells (light green and blue cylinders). Indicated are the valve mantle thickness (MT), valve face thickness (VFT), copulae thickness (CT) and cylindrical diameter (CD). Red arrows: positions of crack initiation. (b) Graph of the tendency of the maximum loading force on the cylindrical diameter. Blue points: Ellerbeckia, cyan point: Melosira.
Figure 7. Diagrams of the studied fossil frustules. (a) Schematic diagram of studied fossil frustules with two diatom cells (light green and blue cylinders). Indicated are the valve mantle thickness (MT), valve face thickness (VFT), copulae thickness (CT) and cylindrical diameter (CD). Red arrows: positions of crack initiation. (b) Graph of the tendency of the maximum loading force on the cylindrical diameter. Blue points: Ellerbeckia, cyan point: Melosira.
Nanomaterials 11 01615 g007
Table 1. Structure parameters and maximal loading force (Fmax) of the frustules in mechanical tests.
Table 1. Structure parameters and maximal loading force (Fmax) of the frustules in mechanical tests.
SampleFmaxCylindrical Diameter (CD)Valve Thickness (VFT)Mantle Wall Thickness (MT)Copulae Thickness (CT)
mNµmµmµmµm
Frustule 1 (Ellerbeckia)82.2 ± 0.580.0 ± 0.92.43 ± 0.13.5 ± 0.20.81 ± 0.07
Frustule 2 (Ellerbeckia)45.2 ± 0.369.5 ± 0.71.99 ± 0.072.9 ± 0.30.75 ± 0.03
Frustule 3 (Ellerbeckia)44.1 ± 0.262.5 ± 0.71.71 ± 0.082.6 ± 0.20.67 ± 0.02
Frustule 4 (Melosira)20.6 ± 0.546.0 ± 0.41.6 ± 0.31.16 ± 0.09 *0.78 ± 0.08
* Because of the uneven mantle wall of the Melosira, the data are the average value from the linking region of the epivalve and hypovalve on the mantle wall (orange arrow in Figure 3c).
Table 2. Comparison of the different structure parameters with the cylindrical diameter.
Table 2. Comparison of the different structure parameters with the cylindrical diameter.
SampleVFT/CDMT/CDCT/CD
Frustule 1 (Ellerbeckia)0.0300.0440.010
Frustule 2 (Ellerbeckia)0.0290.0410.011
Frustule 3 (Ellerbeckia)0.0270.0410.011
Frustule 4 (Melosira)0.0350.0250.017
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, Q.; Gluch, J.; Liao, Z.; Posseckardt, J.; Clausner, A.; Łępicka, M.; Grądzka-Dahlke, M.; Zschech, E. Morphology and Mechanical Properties of Fossil Diatom Frustules from Genera of Ellerbeckia and Melosira. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 1615. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11061615

AMA Style

Li Q, Gluch J, Liao Z, Posseckardt J, Clausner A, Łępicka M, Grądzka-Dahlke M, Zschech E. Morphology and Mechanical Properties of Fossil Diatom Frustules from Genera of Ellerbeckia and Melosira. Nanomaterials. 2021; 11(6):1615. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11061615

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Qiong, Jürgen Gluch, Zhongquan Liao, Juliane Posseckardt, André Clausner, Magdalena Łępicka, Małgorzata Grądzka-Dahlke, and Ehrenfried Zschech. 2021. "Morphology and Mechanical Properties of Fossil Diatom Frustules from Genera of Ellerbeckia and Melosira" Nanomaterials 11, no. 6: 1615. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11061615

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop