Next Article in Journal
Cost Effective Silver Nanowire-Decorated Graphene Paper for Drop-On SERS Biodetection
Previous Article in Journal
Novel Strategy for the Development of Antibacterial TiO2 Thin Film onto Polymer Substrate at Room Temperature
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 11
Issue 6
10.3390/nano11061494
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Solid State NMR Spectroscopy a Valuable Technique for Structural Insights of Advanced Thin Film Materials: A Review

by
Mustapha El Hariri El Nokab
1 and
Khaled O. Sebakhy
2,*
1
Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands
2
Engineering and Technology Institute Groningen, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2021, 11(6), 1494; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11061494
Submission received: 9 May 2021 / Revised: 31 May 2021 / Accepted: 2 June 2021 / Published: 4 June 2021
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Solid-state NMR has proven to be a versatile technique for studying the chemical structure, 3D structure and dynamics of all sorts of chemical compounds. In nanotechnology and particularly in thin films, the study of chemical modification, molecular packing, end chain motion, distance determination and solvent-matrix interactions is essential for controlling the final product properties and applications. Despite its atomic-level research capabilities and recent technical advancements, solid-state NMR is still lacking behind other spectroscopic techniques in the field of thin films due to the underestimation of NMR capabilities, availability, great variety of nuclei and pulse sequences, lack of sensitivity for quadrupole nuclei and time-consuming experiments. This article will comprehensively and critically review the work done by solid-state NMR on different types of thin films and the most advanced NMR strategies, which are beyond conventional, and the hardware design used to overcome the technical issues in thin-film research.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Thin films have a massive impact on the modern era of technology and have gained unprecedented interest during the past years due to their versatile properties and potential applications [1,2,3,4,5]. They are regarded as the backbone for advanced applications in various fields, such as optical devices [6], electronic devices [7], biosensors and plasmonic devices [8,9,10], environmental [11] and biological applications [12], solar cells [13,14,15], batteries [16,17,18] and so on. This class of advanced materials is generally defined as a thin layer of material having a thickness that ranges from fractions of a nanometer (i.e., monolayer) to several micrometers [19,20]. Thin films are composed of two parts: a layer or multilayer and a substrate where films are deposited on. These layers are extremely diverse, spanning from inorganic to organic materials, and are produced by two deposition methods: (1) physical methods and (2) chemical methods. The quality of thin films produced strongly hinges on their morphology and stability, which determines their final applications. It is also important to mention that the morphology and stability of thin films are strongly dictated by the deposition technique used for their preparation. Among the most commonly used physical deposition methods to prepare thin films are evaporation and sputtering techniques [21,22]. The general mechanism of the evaporation technique relies on changing the phase from solid to vapor and then again to solid phase on a specific substrate. This process usually takes place under vacuum or at controlled atmospheric conditions. Thermal vacuum evaporation is the simplest technique to form thin amorphous films, such as chalcogenide films [23,24], which are widely utilized in memory-switching applications [25,26], phase change materials [27,28] and solar applications [29]. Other evaporation techniques that are also sometimes used include electron beam evaporation [30,31,32] and laser beam evaporation [33,34]. On the other hand, sputtering is most commonly used to deposit metal and oxide films with careful control over crystalline structure and surface roughness [35,36]. In the sputtering process, an evacuated chamber composed of a metallic anode and cathode is used to generate a glow discharge, which results in the bombardment of ions [35]. The applied voltage during this process is usually in the order of several keV, and a pressure of more than 0.01 mbar is enough to ensure film deposition [35]. There are two common types of sputtering: (a) direct current (DC) sputtering and (b) radio frequency (RF) sputtering [37,38]. Aluminum nitride films are typical examples of films produced by sputtering [37,38].
Even though physical deposition methods provide high-quality thin films, they require expensive equipment and are highly costly [19,20]. Hence, chemical deposition methods are sought as economically viable and widely used global methods for the production of thin films [19,20]. Chemical deposition depends on the chemistry of solutions, pH, viscosity and so on. Among the paramount techniques used in chemical deposition is the sol–gel [39,40,41] route, which produces high-quality films with low equipment requirements. Additionally, this process produces a large quantity of nanosized films with modeled and controlled particle size, morphology, orientation and crystal structure, as well as optimized physical and chemical properties [42]. The sol–gel method has been applied to synthesize metal oxides, where it simply relies on the conversion of a colloidal suspension “sol” into a viscous gel [42]. Additionally, among the other important chemical deposition techniques that have been widely applied are: chemical vapor deposition (CVD) [43,44,45,46], spin coating [47,48,49], dip coating [50,51], chemical bath deposition [52,53] and spray pyrolysis technique [54,55].
In order to tailor the final properties of thin films in a targeted application and obtain information on their morphology, chemical and physical properties, there is a dire and urgent need to carefully characterize such films. Several characterization techniques in the past have been deployed to analyze thin films [56,57,58], but only minor attention was given to solid-state NMR with its wide range of techniques [59]. Over the last decades, solid-state NMR has developed from a low-resolution shadowed technique into an indispensable one for structural and dynamic determination of a wide range of solid and semi-solid systems. NMR is a physical phenomenon based on the perturbation of the nuclear spin located in a strong external magnetic field using a weak oscillating magnetic field, which intern responds by an electromagnetic signal that is detected and transformed into spectra. When the oscillation frequency matches the intrinsic frequency of the targeted nuclei, resonance occurs; hence, valuable chemical information can be determined. NMR phenomenon is summarized in three sequential steps:
  • The alignment of the nuclear spins along the applied external magnetic field.
  • The perturbation of this alignment using a weak oscillating magnetic field.
  • The detection of the NMR signal (voltage induced in a detection coil).
The interactions between the active nuclear spins and the magnetic fields determine the line shape of the peaks, thus the overall broadness of the spectra. Therefore, different solid-state NMR techniques were developed, including newly designed pulse sequences, to suppress and eliminate the broadness in the spectra of solid materials [60].
The arising orientation-dependent nuclear magnetic interactions in immobilized solid states is from the restricted thermal motions and lack of rapid molecular tumbling. This insufficient mobility exposes different types of internuclear and orientation-dependent nuclear interactions that accommodate information on the local geometric and electronic structure. Solid-state NMR is capable of performing a variety of experiments on a wide range of nuclei to retrieve valuable information on the local geometric and electronic structure from the emerged orientation-dependent nuclear magnetic interactions. The range of nuclei solid-state NMR is capable of measuring is not limited to the conventional nuclei for organic materials typical 1H [61,62,63,64] and 13C [65,66,67,68] nuclei for organic thin films, but extends in inorganic thin films to cover a huge portion from the periodic table such as 2H [69,70], 7,8Li [71,72,73], 11B [74], 14,15N [72,75], 17O [76], 19F [77,78,79], 27Al [80,81,82,83], 29Si [84,85,86,87], 31P [71,72,86,88,89], 55Mn [90,91,92], 59Co [93,94,95], 69,71Ga [75,96], 75As [97], 89Y [98], 129Xe [99,100] and 207Pb [101]. The most suitable solid-state NMR techniques for different thin-film types are summarized below in Table 1.

2. Chemical Connectivity

2.1. Inorganic Films

Carbon-based thin films [102] are involved in a wide range of applications starting from porous carbon/graphene nanosheets [103,104] in high-performance supercapacitors to diamond films [105], showing superconductive properties when doped with boron. The superconductive properties of diamond films doped with boron open the route for the exploration of the superconductivity origin in the proximity of metal-insulator transition. Therefore, four types of boron-doped diamond films having different crystallization properties and thickness (i.e., thick-100, thin-100, 111 and polycrystalline) were deposited on substrates by means of microwave plasma-assisted chemical vapor deposition method and investigated using 11B NMR [74].
11B is usually the nuclide choice in NMR since it is more sensitive and yields a sharper signal compared to the other boron nuclei, but when boron is doped in the diamond film, the signal intensity is directly affected by the amount of doped boron. Therefore, 11B is the measured nuclei unless the sample is enriched with 10B. Figure 1 shows a 11B NMR spectrum at 4.2 K and 34.887 MHz for the (111) diamond film [74]. The spectrum consists of 2 overlapped peaks for different boron-doped sites in the diamond films, a narrow peak located around Δf = 0 with a linewidth of 5 kHz and a broad one extended between Δf = −40 and 20 kHz. The narrow peak (blue shade) was assigned for high symmetry boron sites placed in substitutional positions of the carbon ones, and the broader peak (green shade) was assigned for boron sites in lower local symmetry, including boron–hydrogen complexes, interstitial boron sites, boron–boron occupied sites and boron sites located near lattice defects. Boron–hydrogen complexes are considered the dominant species in the broad peak (green shade) due to the synthetic process utilized, which includes using a mixed gas of CH4, (CH3)3B and H2.
Moreover, it is worthwhile to pinpoint that resolving the solid–solid interface on an atomic scale is a major obstacle facing different fields of material sciences. Complex oxide heterostructures are a combination of two or more different phases where the solid–solid interface enhances the functional properties. Preparing complex oxide heterostructure as thin films and, in particular, as vertically aligned nanocomposite films have promising applications in different fields, including superconductors and data storage media. In contrast to the conventional planar multi-layered heterostructures, the interfaces are aligned perpendicular to the layout of the substrate. A deep analysis of the interfacial surface is required for better understanding and optimizing the thin film designs [76].
17O NMR is a valuable technique for studying the presence of motion and the local structural distortions caused mainly by defects over the interface in heterostructures [106]. However, acquiring useful information from 17O NMR requires the isotopic enrichment of 17O nuclei, which is done mainly by labeled 17O2 gas state or H217O in an aqueous state [107]. Figure 2a shows the 17O NMR spectrum of the CeO2–SrTiO3 vertically aligned nanocomposite lift-off thin films, enriched with 17O at 450 °C and spun at 50 kHz in a 1.3 mm rotor [76]. From the deconvolution of the obtained 17O spectrum, the CeO2 signal observed at 879 ppm shows several components overlapped, including a narrow peak at 877 ppm for bulk CeO2 located near the core of the nanopillars and a broad CeO2 environment closer to the interface. Furthermore, upon analyzing the CeO2 signal in terms of symmetry, the signal appears to be asymmetric, and additional peaks are detected at 837 and 1000 ppm corresponding to the CeO2-like interfacial environment. Additional to the CeO2 environment, SrTiO3 and ZrO2 (from NMR rotor) signals appear at 466 and 377 ppm, respectively. Between the CeO2 and SrTiO3 environments, a broad resonance centered between the different environments appears clearly at 680 ppm and another at a smaller one at 575 ppm ascribed to SrTiO3 interfacial environment. Figure 2b, c shows isotropic chemical shifts as a function of distance from the interface for several predicted interfacial structures using DFT calculations. Figure 2b shows nine DFT calculated lowest energy 0° interfaces (A–I), where the layer linked to the CeO2 side shows a wide spread of values centered close to the bulk CeO2 side around 820 ppm and some other environments predicted at different frequencies at around 560 and 1000 ppm, which arise from the layer on the SrTiO3 and three-fold coordinated CeO2. Inversely to the formal interface, Figure 2c shows the 45° interfaces where the missing 680 ppm signal in the 0° interfaces appears and corresponds to the shared anionic layer. Further calculations show the presence of two interfaces forming the signal at 680 ppm where the first corresponds to the anion layer arranged according to the SrTiO3 structure with 14 O2− ions and the second according to the CeO2 structure with 20 O2− ions. From the calculated shifts the interfacial oxygen’s intermediate between the CeO2 and SrTiO3 structures, some modifications appear on the local oxygen environment adjacent to the SrTiO3 interface as fewer oxygen ions are available to coordinate with all the Ce4+ ions, leading to the withdrawal of more electron density from the adjacent oxygen ones, thus deshielding them and perturbing the chemical shift. On the other hand, the 20 O2− ion CeO2 interface shows a predicted range of 660–700 ppm consistent with the experimental results at 680 ppm, thus showing tetrahedrally coordinated oxygen ions adjacent to two Ce4+ ions and one Ti4+ and Sr4+ ions [76].

2.2. Organic Films

Organic semiconducting thin films have promising applications in different industrial fields, such as organic light-emitting diodes [108], organic solar cells [109] and organic thin-film transistors [110]. For obtaining the highest performance of a film-based device, the molecular orientation of the organic thin films should be studied. Solid-state NMR, contrary to X-ray diffraction, is capable of extracting structural information and molecular orientation from amorphous compounds, but the amount of information that could be extracted is limited to the sensitivity of hardware and nuclei. Therefore, in order to obtain the desired sensitivity, the maximum amount of sample should be packed in a bulk form, or polarization enhancement techniques should be used in the case of thin films. Static dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) enhanced solid-state NMR was chosen to enhance the sensitivity of phenyldi(pyren-1-yl) phosphine oxide (POPy2), a semiconducting organic material frequently used in organic light-emitting diodes for its electron transport properties. In the selected DNP experiments, a microwave irradiates dispersed radicals in the sample, which leads to an electron polarization transfer from the polarized electrons towards the 1H population in the sample. This polarization is further transferred into other nuclei by means of cross-polarization (CP), resulting in the sensitivity enhancement for the 31P nuclei in these samples [111].
Amorphous POPy2 thin layers were deposited on (SiO2 or polytetrafluoroethylene) substrates using vacuum-deposited and drop-cast techniques. The thin layers were doped with a polarizing agent (bisnitroxide radical), and the concentration of radicals (0.25 wt%) was chosen to avoid electron-electron exchange couplings, which decrease the DNP efficiency. 31P CP DNP solid-state NMR experiments under static conditions were performed on perpendicularly aligned POPy2 thin layers with respect to the external magnetic field to obtain conformational information on 31P=O from the chemical shift anisotropy (CSA). Figure 3 shows the 31P CSA spectra for amorphous POPy2 thin layers deposited on glass substrates in the presence and absence of DNP enhancement [111]. Additional to the presence and absence of DNP enhancement, different layer deposition techniques were compared in Figure 3a,b and a different number of sheets were compared, leading to the calculation of the DNP enhancement factor according to the integral signal intensity of the CSA in the presence and absence of DNP enhancement in Figure 3a,c. The DNP enhancement factor was affected by several factors, including the type of substrate and the number of sheets used, where using only one POPy2 thin layer gave the highest enhancement, which could be attributed to the cooling efficiency of the thin film. The CSA patterns for both samples were axially symmetric and covered a wide range of the chemical shift (−100 to 100 ppm) depending on the P=O orientation. P=O axis of POPy2 having an orientation parallel to the external magnetic field is around −100 ppm, while the perpendicular orientation is around 100 ppm. The CSA pattern of the vacuum deposited POPy2 shows a higher intensity around 100 ppm compared to that of the drop cast sample, and this indicates a greater contribution for the parallel aligned P=O orientation in the vacuum-deposited POPy2 film [111].
Conjugated polymers offer significant advantages over different materials when used in printable and flexible semiconductors due to their cheap, sustainable and solution-processable properties. The high mobility in these materials comes from the partial electron charge transfer between the donor and acceptor groups, which depends on the chemical properties for these groups, such as the polymeric backbone conformations and molecular level stacking arrangement of the adjacent polymer chains. However, challenges face the development of these materials in both their bulk and thin film forms since few characterization techniques are able to probe the atomic level in the presence of disorder and provide structural, conformational and packing information. Therefore, solid-state NMR with its MAS and DNP techniques offer the ability to characterize the polymeric backbone conformations and packing arrangement for the high-mobility donor-acceptor copolymer diketopyrrolo-pyrrole-dithienylthieno[3,2-b] thiophene (DPP-DTT) [112].
Figure 4 shows the DNP enhanced 13C CP MAS NMR spectra for (a) 1D spectra for bulk DPP-DTT polymer with and without microwave irradiation at 263 GHz, where the enhancement factor reached 130 for the aliphatic part of the polymer [112]. The spectrum shows low resolution that is demonstrated in broader linewidths due to the presence of a paramagnetic polarizing agent on one side and the reduction of thermal motional averaging since the experiment is performed at 100 K on the other side. The 2D 1H-13C HETCOR spectra for the DPP-DTT polymer in its bulk and thin film form using the drop-cast technique are shown in Figure 4b,c. Comparing the 2D HETCOR spectra shows that the structure in both bulk and film forms are highly identical, this is determined based on the detected weak intermolecular interactions between the quaternary carbons C1 and C2, and the corresponding hydrogens H6/H9 showing that the expected structure (based on the simulation model) is preserved even after applying the solution deposition technique. 1D spectra for DPP-DTT polymer in its thin-film form using the drop-cast and spin-coating technique are shown in Figure 4d. It is worth mentioning that the DNP experiments provide high-quality spectra in a relatively short experimental time (hours scale), despite using a limited amount of sample (1 mg). 13C NMR spectroscopy is not expected to provide useful information on drop-cast and spin-coated films at natural abundance for such limited sample amounts (1 mg) without using the DNP technique [112].
Combining several techniques for collecting structural information about DPP-DTT films provides a great overview of its high-charge carrier mobility ion devices. Two of the most important factors contributing to the efficiency of intramolecular charge transport are the degree of backbone planarity, which is based on the torsion energies of the backbone groups, and the hydrogen bonding located between thiophene and DPP units [112].
The membrane technology has emerged with conventional separation methods, which are well known and used in industry due to their sustainable production process, simplified scaling-up and energy cost efficiency [113]. There has been a tremendous amount of time and effort devoted to design novel membrane materials that are capable of fast and efficient separation. The three aforementioned benefits were achieved with the development of thin-film composite membranes, especially when synthesized from sustainable sources [114]. Those materials designed from an ultra-thin selective layer supported on a porous polymer template, and their applications have ranged from ionic filtration, metal cation separation and gas permeability [115,116].

3. Recent Advancement in NMR Strategies and Hardware Design

3.1. Hardware Advancements (Probe and Coil Design)

Magic angle spinning (MAS) is one of the most essential and valuable techniques in solid-state NMR [117,118] since it provides high-resolution spectra not only for crystalline samples but also for amorphous ones. The high resolution is obtained upon mechanically rotating the sample over an axis aligned at the magic angle (54.7°) to the external magnetic field. Among the few thin-film samples measured by MAS NMR, all sample preparation methods used were based on scratching the sample off the substrate previous to the rotor packing [81,84,85,119,120], lift-off technique, which is mainly composed of the water-soluble buffer layer method [121], followed by the polymer transfer layer method [122] and stacking the rotor with proper size pieces of thin films [123]. Solid-state NMR measurements on thin films were only possible in static mode (without sample rotation); thus, high-resolution spectra were limited to samples without anisotropic interactions [75,97]. The non-destructive property of MAS NMR leads to the development of new probe and coil designs capable of measuring thin films, including the disk MAS design present in Figure 5 [124]. Inspired from the MAS design having a thin capillary tube fixed on top of the rotor [125,126,127], the disk MAS design requires the fixing of a circular quartz substrate glued to an attachment on top of a 4 mm pencil design rotor [124]. Additionally, an external probe composed of a silver-wire coil, chip capacitors and trimmer capacitors was assembled and secured to the spinning module. Radio frequency (RF) amplitude and inhomogeneity calibration were performed on the disk MAS, and the radio frequency efficiency was 2.0 folds lower compared to that of the conventional MAS probe. The significant advantages of the disk MAS are summarized in its ability to characterize the thin film under the nondestructive MAS conditions and tracing the identical thin film undergoing ex situ experiments, such as annealing, discharging/charging and degradation [124].
Several groups were able to produce microcoils using lithographic methods, but despite all the efforts conducted, these approaches did not reach the mainstream production in NMR spectroscopy [128,129,130]. Several microcoil designs were introduced and tested previously, including the micro helix coil, planar micro helix coil, saddle coil, stripline design [131] and the microslot design [132]. The latter design has a comparable approach with the stripline one, which, in turn, alternates from the helical coil design. Planar helices microcoil designs suffer from several problems, including B1 field homogeneity, increase in RF shielding currents and windings of the microcoil, thus leading to a severe reduction in resolution and sensitivity and difficulty in implementing 2D NMR methods [133].
The passage of an RF current through a straight wire leads to the generation of an electromagnetic RF field encircling the wire. When the wire is in a position parallel to a static magnetic field, a new magnetic field is generated perpendicular to the static one, which can be used for the excitation of NMR spins. The homogeneity of the static magnetic field is barely disrupted from the positioned wire. The stripeline coil is basically a 2D flat copper wire covered with symmetric ground planes from both sides to confine the RF radiation, reduce the RF field strength decay and keep it homogeneous. The applied RF current passes through the flat strip, and a generated RF field encircles the strip. The local current density is at maximum in the middle of the strip, particularly between the boundaries of the restriction, which results in a high RF field at the sample placed along the channel. The signal generated from the sample dominates the overall signal detected by the coil. Several factors were found to be affecting the resolution and sensitivity of the stripline coil, including the tapering angle, gap width and the aqueous fluid filling the gap, as shown in Figure 6 [134]. Compromised parameters were chosen depending on numerical simulation to obtain the highest resolution and sensitivity [133,134,135]. The novel stripline probe technology proved to be valuable in studying thin films where it provided high sensitivity to detect highly mobile hydrogen species in photochromic thin films [98].

3.2. Sensitivity Detection (MRFM, β-Magnet)

NMR has established its position as an inevitable analytical technique in many areas of research, but every technique has its limitations and sensitivity, which is the main issue for NMR. NMR spectroscopy has suffered from relativity low sensitivity, especially in detection methods due to the extremely low thermodynamic population difference between the nuclear spin levels. Different methods for improving the detection sensitivity of NMR have been developed based on mechanical detection, where the first successful application was called Magnetic Resonance Force Microscopy (MRFM) [136]. The basic principle of MRFM relies on the use of a mechanical cantilever already known from Atomic Force Microscopy to detect exerted forces on a spin system in the presence of an inhomogeneous magnetic field [137]. The force experienced by the nuclear magnetic dipole moment upon settling in an external gradient field is detected by the atomic force microscope cantilever by mechanical means, and thus sub-angstrom resolution may be reached from the cantilever deflection. The inhomogeneous magnetic field is created by introducing a small magnetic particle in an external magnetic field, which results in the variation of the Larmor resonance over the sample; thus, particular slices of the sample can be excited through the variation of the irradiation frequency or the position of the magnetic field gradient source. The configuration for MRFM is illustrated in Figure 7 [77].
The driving force for developing the MRFM was the possibility to detect a single spin, which could make it an important tool in quantum computation, the efforts were successful [138], and MRFM was developed not only to detect electrons [139] but also protons [140] and latter isotope selective nuclei in organic monolayers [141]. The advancements in MRFM continued with the advanced observation of magnetization, enhanced resolution and no gradient (BOOMERANG) technique [142], ending with the coupling of ultrasensitive MRFM with 3D image reconstruction to achieve magnetic resonance imaging with <10 nm resolution limit [143].
Although advanced solid-state NMR techniques and pulse sequences, including MAS, are not applicable in MRFM, an NMR approach based on force detection method for chemical investigations using relaxation times or chemical shifts was developed [77]. Quadrupole nuclei and low γ nuclei are the best candidates for high-resolution imaging since the external field gradient does not have a major sensitivity enhancement effect, thus leaving this enhancement to be determined by the local structure experienced by the nuclei [144]. In particular, applications for MRFM includes the fields of coatings, colloids and semiconductors [77,145].
The implantation of probes (radioactive ions) that are highly spin polarized is an effective technique to overcome the low number of nuclei for a measurable signal in nanoscopic systems [146]. Optical pumping is an advanced method for spin polarization, as it provides reproducible results even with a very high degree of spin polarization (10–100%). Additionally, the need for extreme cooling of the ions is not compulsory in optical pumping since it depends on atom/ion interaction with circularly polarized laser beams. The transfer of polarization from the electron to the nucleus is completed via hyperpolarization interaction [147,148].
β-NMR spectroscopy depends on the β particles emitted anisotropically during the decay of spin-polarized nuclei. The configuration for β-NMR is illustrated in Figure 8 [149]. The beam exposed to optical pumping implants into the NMR sample after its passage through the polarization section. A continuous RF field is applied on the sample leading to the nuclear sub-level transitions at the resonance frequency, and the decrease in spin polarization as the change in β-decay asymmetry is recorded. The employment of a highly spin-polarized radioactive beam with β-NMR creates a novel nuclear method of detection that has enough sensitivity to detect the presence of a single probe nucleus and build up a typical spectrum [150]. Due to its novel features such as high magnetic fields and the ability to control the depth of implantation ranging between 2–200 nm, β-NMR found many applications in surface science [151], insulators [152], semiconductors [153,154], antiferromagnetics [155] and thin films [73,149,156,157,158].

3.3. Polarization Enhancement (Natural Abundance DNP versus Thin Films)

The transfer of polarization from electrons spins to nuclear ones through hyperfine interactions is called hyperpolarization. Upon the relaxation of the electron spin temperature back to the thermal equilibrium after its exposure to external microwaves, nuclear spins are hyperpolarized, leading to a drastic enhancement in the obtained NMR spectra. The term dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) was assigned to distinguish this scheme from alternative hyperpolarization methods [159].
DNP NMR spectroscopy has been successfully applied to materials research more than to other biological systems due to the fact that the experiments are conducted at cryogenic temperatures between 20 K and 110 K. At these cryogenic temperatures, maximum sensitivity enhancements are obtained since electron relaxation time is long enough for the polarization to be transferred to the nuclei. In the case of an ideal nuclear polarization transfer, the NMR signal could match the ESR one, and DNP NMR could find new applications in surface chemistry [159]. DNP NMR spectroscopy was recently applied on different types of thin films, including phosphorus-doped silicon [88], organolead halide perovskites [101] and organic semiconducting ones [111].

4. High-Tech Opportunities beyond Conventional Methods

In recent years, Solid-state NMR has observed significant developments and advancements that potentially revolutionized the field with respect to sensitivity and resolution. Hereby, we list the recently established techniques in solid-state NMR and explain explicitly the proper research directions that should be taken with respect to thin-film materials. The following methods are beyond the conventional known ones and include ultra-fast spinning, ultra-high magnetic fields, hyperpolarization techniques, pulse-field gradient NMR diffusion experiments and NMR relaxometry.

4.1. Ultra-Fast MAS Spinning for 1H, 19F and Heavy Spin-½ Nuclei

Spectroscopic sensitivity is a critical parameter upon studying thin-film materials, and ultra-fast MAS spinning is an elegant method for achieving that. Although 1H and 19F are expected to provide the highest sensitivity due to their high isotopic abundance and gyromagnetic ratios (99.985%, 42.577 MHz·T−1 for 1H and 100%, 40.078 MHz·T−1 for 19F), these nuclei can benefit from ultra-fast MAS spinning in different ways. For example, conduct a set of proton-detection experiments (2D COSY, 2D INEPT, 3D INEPT-TOCSY and 2D RFDR techniques) to assign the resonance and determining the intermolecular packing [160,161,162], enable proton-detection of the mobile matrix, filter out the signals of the rigid domain [163], narrow the line-width so it is comparable to solution-state NMR, assign the resonances without perdeuteration of the sample [164,165] and measure the 19F-19F/1H distances beyond 1 nm [166,167,168] without disrupting the hydrogen bonds and intermolecular packing of the material by an appropriate sparsely fluorinate labeling [168,169]. Additionally, several quadrupole nuclei having short longitudinal relaxation times benefit from the rapid acquisition of proton-detected 2D HETCOR solid-state NMR spectra under MAS conditions to obtain various chemical information [170].
Heavy spin-½ nuclei in general, and Tin in particular, has extensive use in industry and academic research. Extracting chemical information about the different positions of the heavy spin-½ nuclei and the surrounding environments is essential. Ultra-fast MAS spinning experiments are considered extremely beneficial for their simplification of ultra-wide line NMR spectra, increased mass sensitivity and the extraction of chemical information, including chemical shift anisotropy, tensor parameters, and asymmetry [171].

4.2. Ultra-High Magnetic Fields for Quadrupole Nuclei

Recently, new types of ultra-high NMR magnets were revealed, in addition to the 1.3 GHz (30.6 T) hybrid high temperature and low-temperature superconducting magnets [172]. The newly developed series-connected hybrid magnet hits 1.5 GHz (35.2 T) and is an assembly of a superconducting outset and a resistive insert [173]. The development of ultra-high magnetic fields presents a unique opportunity for the investigation of exotic quadrupole nuclei [174] since quadrupole nuclei show high sensitivity under ultra-high magnetic fields leading to a dramatic change in the spectral line-width scale [175,176,177]. Ultra-high magnetic fields resolve to a certain extent the line-broadening associated with the second-order quadrupole coupling [106]. Applying multi-field experiments is a decisive exploration strategy for extracting structural information and exploring the chemical environment of exotic quadrupole nuclei such as 2H, 17O, 33S and 35Cl in organic thin films and 7Li, 11B, 51V, 59Co, 67Zn, 71Ga and 89Yb in inorganic ones.
The greatest challenge for quadrupole nuclei is the extraction of quantitative information; the expected route to achieve this is by rapid advancements in computational methods, which enables the calculation of NMR parameters and spectral interpretation. Moreover, the development of sensitivity boosting CryoProbes [178] and multichannel probes that are capable of decoupling multiple quadrupole nuclei for enhancing spectral resolution in inorganic thin films [59].

4.3. Isotopic Enrichment of NMR Active Nuclei vs. Paramagnetic Doping for Sensitivity Boosting

Isotopic enrichment provides significant spectral sensitivity compared to natural abundance; many NMR active nuclei could be used in their enriched form to grant the necessary sensitivity needed. Various biological compounds, such as amino acids and sugars, are 13C and 15N labeled, which are used as precursors to produce uniformly or site-specific enriched proteins. Thin-film materials can also benefit from isotopic enrichment in several directions, including the 29Si-enriched precursors [179] for the production of organosilicate thin films, 17O-enriched [107] liquid H217O or gaseous 17O for the production of oxides, ceramics and catalysts, 119Sn-enriched strips [180] for the production of thin-film perovskites, 43Ca-enriched [181,182,183] carbonate thin films and several more opportunities [184].
On the other hand, paramagnetic relaxation reagents are widely used in solution-state NMR for their reducing relaxation properties and cost effectiveness, where the unpaired electrons originating from the paramagnetic species interact uniformly with the nuclear spins, thus enhancing the relaxation process [185,186]. The reduction of the relaxation time grants the quick accumulation of measuring scans leading to enhanced sensitivity in a time interval. Paramagnetic dopants are less effective in solid samples since the paramagnetic species can only interact with the neighboring nuclei but not with distant ones, thus leading to an inhomogeneous relaxation and partially resolved line-broadening [187,188]. Paramagnetic dopants were applied on thin organic semiconductors using vacuum-deposition techniques showing promising sensitivity boosting abilities when coupled to cross-polarization NMR techniques [189].

4.4. Advanced Hyperpolarization Techniques

Hyperpolarization techniques and especially natural abundance DNP ones have enhanced the NMR sensitivity drastically, but the efficiency of polarization in DNP experiments scales inversely to the external magnetic field, making high-field DNP (>9.4 T) unlucrative. Most continuous-wave DNP experiments are operated at cryogenic temperatures and moderate magnetic fields in order to obtain the desired sensitivity enhancement. The future development pathways are in the combination of fast MAS and DNP NMR [190,191] and overcoming the polarization vs. magnetic field/temperature correlation [188] by developing pulsed DNP techniques [192,193] and new polarization strategies applicable at ambient temperatures. Several hyperpolarization techniques are available and could be applied on different thin-film materials depending on their magnetic properties, such as DNP surface-enhanced NMR spectroscopy for organosilicate materials [159,194,195,196], optical pumping used for phosphorus donor nuclei, ENDOR for paramagnetic nuclei and enhancement effect in magnets for ferromagnetic nuclei [197].

4.5. NMR Techniques beyond Spectroscopy (NMR Diffusometry, Fast Field Cycle NMR, Zero Field NMR, Magnetic Resonance Imaging)

NMR techniques are extended beyond spectroscopy limits to reach diffusometry, relaxometry and imaging techniques. NMR diffusometry is also known as pulse-field gradient NMR is capable of keeping track of molecular ensembles along their diffusion pathways for distances ranging between nano- to micrometers. Its unique ability to trace the rate of molecular transport vs the distance travel makes it an attractive technique to study not only the molecular displacement as a function of time and distance but also the diffusion anisotropy, impact of diffusion on chemical conversion in porous materials and domain size distribution [198]. NMR diffusometry with all the advantages it offers was barely used in thin-film research, but it has shown valuable applications in organic thin films, especially in bulk heterojunction organic photovoltaics [199], nafion [200] and liquid crystal thin films [201].
NMR relaxometry and imaging techniques can offer decisive information about the composition, nanomorphology and dynamics in thin-film research; these techniques have well established their foot in different areas of research and proved to be as valuable as NMR spectroscopy. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has proven to be a versatile imaging technique. While it is remarkably used in biomedical research, it is also capable of producing images in material science. Magnetic resonance imaging forms an image of the measured environment solely depending on the density of protons in specific regions. Scanning with gradient coils causes the selected region to experience the specific magnetic field needed to absorb the energy, and the excited spins possess different relaxation behavior, which is measured by a receiving coil. Magnetic resonance imaging is a valuable technique for studying the solvent–matrix interactions not only in biomedical fields but also in material science and advanced film fields [202]. Meanwhile, Relaxometry refers to the study of relaxation variables under magnetic resonance and magnetic resonance imaging, where the relaxation rate of the nuclear spins is dependent on the mobility of the surrounding microscopic environment. The relaxation properties of the spins are also dependent on the applied magnetic field, where the sensitivity is enhanced for dynamic environments in strong magnetic fields and for rigid environments in low magnetic fields.
Solid-state NMR relaxometry has established its position in food science, including the determination of moisture content, solid fat content and much more [203] and shown to be complementary to traditional microscopic techniques in studying the phase morphology of blended materials used in semiconductive polymer-based devices [204].

5. Summary, Concluding Remarks and Future Perspectives

Solid-state NMR has established its position in different fields of science, starting from inorganic materials such as zeolites [205], inorganic polymers [206] and borane-phosphane [207] passing through biological [208] and biotechnological systems [209] such as carbohydrates [210], proteins [211], biomembranes [212] and plant cell wall [213], environmental chemistry [214], and ending up with material science, including metal organic frameworks [215], perovskites [216], organic semiconductors [217] and functional nanomaterials [218]. Solid-state NMR spectroscopy, with its diverse techniques and measured nuclei, offers a wide range of valuable information on the geometric and electronic structure of advanced thin-film materials. Solid-state NMR is a promising technique in resolving as yet missing aspects of the molecular structure, polymorphism, packing and dynamics of thin films. Sensitivity is a great issue in solid-state NMR, placing it on the border, but recent technical and hardware advancements brought solutions to this that provided molecular information beyond expectations. In this article, we have reviewed the most advanced NMR strategies and hardware design to be used in studying advanced thin-film materials, but nowadays, there is no single technique capable of providing information on all different chemical levels. Ideally, the pursuit of integrated methods such as the combination of solid-state NMR advanced techniques with microscopic analysis and computational approaches can provide the most valuable information in studying advanced thin-film materials.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by financial support from the Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials (ZIAM) at the University of Groningen, including funding from the Bonus Incentive Scheme (of the Dutch Ministry for Education, Culture and Science (OCW)). Special thanks to Zhenlei Zhang for the artwork provided in the graphical abstract.

Conflicts of Interest

All authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kindlund, H.; Sangiovanni, D.G.; Petrov, I.; Greene, J.E.; Hultman, L. A review of the intrinsic ductility and toughness of hard transition-metal nitride alloy thin films. Thin Solid Film. 2019, 688, 137479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wang, X.; Xu, P.; Han, R.; Ren, J.; Li, L.; Han, N.; Xing, F.; Zhu, J. A review on the mechanical properties for thin film and block structure characterized by using nanoscratch test. Nano-Technol. Rev. 2019, 8, 628–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jansson, U.; Lewin, E. Carbon-containing multi-component thin films. Thin Solid Film. 2019, 688, 137411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhao, C.; Li, L.-Y.; Guo, M.-M.; Zheng, J. Functional polymer thin films designed for anti-fouling materials and biosensors. Chem. Pap. 2012, 66, 323–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Spivack, M.A. Mechanical Properties of Very Thin Polymer Films. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 1972, 43, 985–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hu, C.; Guo, K.; Li, Y.; Gu, Z.; Quan, J.; Zhang, S.; Zheng, W. Optical coatings of durability based on transition metal nitrides. Thin Solid Film. 2019, 688, 137339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Moon, D.-B.; Lee, J.; Roh, E.; Lee, N.-E. Three-dimensional out-of-plane geometric engineering of thin films for stretchable electronics: A brief review. Thin Solid Film. 2019, 688, 137435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Serrano, A.; de la Fuente, O.R.; García, M.A. Extended and localized surface plasmons in annealed Au films on glass substrates. J. Appl. Phys. 2010, 108, 074303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Liu, X.; Feng, Y.; Chen, K.; Zhu, B.; Zhao, J.; Jiang, T. Planar surface plasmonic waveguide devices based on symmetric corrugated thin film structures. Opt. Express 2014, 22, 20107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Foley, J.J., IV; Harutyunyan, H.; Rosenmann, D.; Divan, R.; Wiederrecht, G.P.; Gray, S.K. When are Surface Plasmon Polaritons Excited in the Kretschmann-Raether Configuration? Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 9929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Branco, R.; Sousa, T.; Piedade, A.P.; Morais, P.V. Immobilization of Ochrobactrum tritici As5 on PTFE thin films for arsenite biofiltration. Chemosphere 2016, 146, 330–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Khlyustova, A.; Cheng, Y.; Yang, R. Vapor-deposited functional polymer thin films in biological applications. J. Mater. Chem. B 2020, 8, 6588–6609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Yu, P.; Yao, Y.; Wu, J.; Niu, X.; Rogach, A.L.; Wang, Z. Effects of Plasmonic Metal Core -Dielectric Shell Nanoparticles on the Broadband Light Absorption Enhancement in Thin Film Solar Cells. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 7696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Terry, M.L.; Straub, A.; Inns, D.; Song, D.; Aberle, A.G. Large open-circuit voltage improvement by rapid thermal annealing of evaporated solid-phase-crystallized thin-film silicon so-lar cells on glass. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2005, 86, 172108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Nayak, P.K.; Mahesh, S.; Snaith, H.J.; Cahen, D. Photovoltaic solar cell technologies: Analysing the state of the art. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2019, 4, 269–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mukanova, A.; Jetybayeva, A.; Myung, S.-T.; Kim, S.-S.; Bakenov, Z. A mini-review on the development of Si-based thin film anodes for Li-ion batteries. Mater. Today Energy 2018, 9, 49–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yang, G.; Abraham, C.; Ma, Y.; Lee, M.; Helfrick, E.; Oh, D.; Lee, D. Advances in Materials De-sign for All-Solid-state Batteries: From Bulk to Thin Films. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 4727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Moitzheim, S.; Put, B.; Vereecken, P.M. Advances in 3D Thin-Film Li-Ion Batteries. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 6, 1900805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jilani, A.; Abdel-wahab, M.S.; Hammad, A.H. Advance Deposition Techniques for Thin Film and Coating. In Modern Technologies for Creating the Thin-Film Systems and Coatings; Nikitenkov, N.N., Ed.; Intech: London, UK, 2017; pp. 137–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Campbell, D.S. Preparation Methods for Thin Films. In Physics of Nonmetallic Thin Films; Dupuy, C.H.S., Cachard, A., Eds.; Springer US: Boston, MA, USA, 1976; pp. 9–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mehran, Q.M.; Fazal, M.A.; Bushroa, A.R.; Rubaiee, S. A Critical Review on Physical Vapor Deposition Coatings Applied on Different Engine Components. Crit. Rev. Solid State Mater. Sci. 2018, 43, 158–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Baptista, A.; Silva, F.; Porteiro, J.; Míguez, J.; Pinto, G. Sputtering Physical Vapour Deposition (PVD) Coatings: A Critical Review on Process Improvement and Market Trend Demands. Coatings 2018, 8, 402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Hassanien, A.S.; Akl, A.A. Effect of Se addition on optical and electrical properties of chal-cogenide CdSSe thin films. Superlattices Microstruct. 2016, 89, 153–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hannachi, A.; Segura, H. Maghraoui-Meherzi, Growth of manganese sulfide (α-MnS) thin films by thermal vacuum evaporation: Structural, morphological and optical properties. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2016, 181, 326–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ananth Kumar, R.T.; Das, C.; Chithra Lekha, P.; Asokan, S.; Sanjeeviraja, C.; Pathinettam Padiyan, D. Enhancement in threshold voltage with thickness in memory switch fabricated using GeSe1.5S0.5 thin films. J. Alloy. Compd. 2014, 615, 629–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Malligavathy, M.; Ananth Kumar, R.T.; Das, C.; Asokan, S.; Pathinettam Padiyan, D. Growth and characteristics of amorphous Sb2Se3 thin films of various thicknesses for memory switching applications. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2015, 429, 93–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Abdel Rafea, M.; Farid, H. Phase change and optical band gap behavior of Se0.8S0.2 chalcogenide glass films. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2009, 113, 868–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sangeetha, B.G.; Joseph, C.M.; Suresh, K. Preparation and characterization of Ge1Sb2Te4 thin films for phase change memory applications. Microelectron. Eng. 2014, 127, 77–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Salomé, P.M.P.; Rodriguez-Alvarez, H.; Sadewasser, S. Incorporation of alkali metals in chalcogenide solar cells. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2015, 143, 9–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Merkel, J.J.; Sontheimer, T.; Rech, B.; Becker, C. Directional growth and crystallization of silicon thin films prepared by electron-beam evaporation on oblique and textured surfaces. J. Cryst. Growth 2013, 367, 126–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yang, B.; Duan, H.; Zhou, C.; Gao, Y.; Yang, J. Ordered nanocolumn-array organic semiconductor thin films with controllable molecular orientation. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2013, 286, 104–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Schulz, U.; Terry, S.G.; Levi, C.G. Microstructure and texture of EB-PVD TBCs grown under different rotation modes. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2003, 360, 319–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ashfold, M.N.R.; Claeyssens, F.; Fuge, G.M.; Henley, S.J. Pulsed laser ablation and deposition of thin films. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2004, 33, 23–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Lynds, L.; Weinberger, B.R.; Potrepka, D.M.; Peterson, G.G.; Lindsay, M.P. High temperature superconducting thin films: The physics of pulsed laser ablation. Phys. C Supercond. 1989, 159, 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Angusmacleod, H. Recent developments in deposition techniques for optical thin films and coatings. In Optical Thin Films and Coatings; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2013; pp. 3–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Barranco, A.; Borras, A.; Gonzalez-Elipe, A.R.; Palmero, A. Perspectives on oblique angle deposition of thin films: From fundamentals to devices. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2016, 76, 59–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Morosanu, C.; Dumitru, V.; Cimpoiasu, E.; Nenu, C. Comparison Between DC and RF Magnetron Sputtered Aluminum Nitride Films. In Diamond Based Composites; Prelas, M.A., Benedictus, A., Lin, L.-T.S., Po-povici, G., Gielisse, P., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1997; pp. 127–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Dumitru, V.; Morosanu, C.; Sandu, V.; Stoica, A. Optical and structural differences between RF and DC AlxNy magnetron sputtered films. Thin Solid Film. 2000, 359, 17–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mersagh Dezfuli, S.; Sabzi, M. Deposition of self-healing thin films by the sol–gel method: A review of layer-deposition mechanisms and activation of self-healing mechanisms. Appl. Phys. A 2019, 125, 557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Nagyal, L.; Gupta, S.S.; Singh, R.; Kumar, A.; Chaudhary, P. Sol-Gel Deposition of Thin Films. In Digital Encyclopedia of Applied Physics; Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Ed.; Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA: Weinheim, Germany, 2019; pp. 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Brinker, C.J.; Hurd, A.J.; Schunk, P.R.; Frye, G.C.; Ashley, C.S. Review of sol-gel thin film formation. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 1992, 147–148, 424–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Livage, J.; Sanchez, C.; Henry, M.; Doeuff, S. The chemistry of the sol-gel process. Solid State Ion. 1989, 32–33, 633–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Mattevi, C.; Kim, H.; Chhowalla, M. A review of chemical vapour deposition of graphene on copper. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 3324–3334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Cai, Z.; Liu, B.; Zou, X.; Cheng, H.-M. Chemical Vapor Deposition Growth and Applications of Two-Dimensional Materials and Their Heterostructures. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 6091–6133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Sun, L.; Yuan, G.; Gao, L.; Yang, J.; Chhowalla, M.; Gharahcheshmeh, M.H.; Gleason, K.K.; Choi, Y.S.; Hong, B.H.; Liu, Z. Chemical vapour deposition. Nat. Rev. Methods Primers 2021, 1, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Chen, N.; Kim, D.H.; Kovacik, P.; Sojoudi, H.; Wang, M.; Gleason, K.K. Polymer Thin Films and Surface Modification by Chemical Vapor Deposition: Recent Progress. Annu. Rev. Chem. Biomol. Eng. 2016, 7, 373–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Danglad-Flores, J.; Eickelmann, S.; Riegler, H. Deposition of polymer films by spin casting: A quantitative analysis. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2018, 179, 257–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Taylor, J.F. Spin coating: An overview. Met. Finish. 2001, 99, 16–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Mavukkandy, M.O.; McBride, S.A.; Warsinger, D.M.; Dizge, N.; Hasan, S.W.; Arafat, H.A. Thin film deposition techniques for polymeric membranes–A review. J. Membr. Sci. 2020, 610, 118258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Tang, X.; Yan, X. Dip-coating for fibrous materials: Mechanism, methods and applications. J. Sol. Gel Sci. Technol. 2017, 81, 378–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Riau, A.K.; Mondal, D.; Setiawan, M.; Palaniappan, A.; Yam, G.H.F.; Liedberg, B.; Venkatraman, S.S.; Mehta, J.S. Functionalization of the Polymeric Surface with Bioceramic Nanoparticles via a Novel, Nonthermal Dip Coating Method. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 35565–35577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Guire, M.R.D.; Bauermann, L.P.; Parikh, H.; Bill, J. Chemical Bath Deposition. In Chemical Solution Deposition of Functional Ox-ide Thin Films; Schneller, T., Waser, R., Kosec, M., Payne, D., Eds.; Springer: Vienna, Austria, 2013; pp. 319–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Contreras-Rascón, J.I.; Díaz-Reyes, J.; Luna-Suárez, S.; Carrillo-Torres, R.C.; Sánchez-Zeferino, R. Characterisation of chemical bath deposition PbS nanofilms using polyethylene-imine, triethanolamine and ammonium nitrate as complexing agents. Thin Solid Film. 2019, 692, 137609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Mooney, J.B.; Radding, S.B. Spray Pyrolysis Processing. Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 1982, 12, 81–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Falcony, C.; Aguilar-Frutis, M.; García-Hipólito, M. Spray Pyrolysis Technique; High-K Die-lectric Films and Luminescent Materials: A Review. Micromachines 2018, 9, 414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Baer, D.R.; Thevuthasan, S. Characterization of Thin Films and Coatings. In Handbook of Deposition Technologies for Films and Coatings; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2010; pp. 749–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Pourjamal, S.; Mäntynen, H.; Jaanson, P.; Rosu, D.M.; Hertwig, A.; Manoocheri, F.; Ikonen, E. Characterization of thin-film thickness. Metrologia 2014, 51, S302–S308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Abbas, A.N.; Liu, G.; Narita, A.; Orosco, M.; Feng, X.; Müllen, K.; Zhou, C. Deposition, Characterization, and Thin-Film-Based Chemical Sensing of Ultra-long Chemically Synthesized Graphene Nanoribbons. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 7555–7558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Reif, B.; Ashbrook, S.E.; Emsley, L.; Hong, M. Solid-state NMR spectroscopy. Nat. Rev. Methods Primers 2021, 1, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Laws, D.D.; Bitter, H.-M.L.; Jerschow, A. Solid-state NMR spectroscopic methods in chemistry. Angew. Chem. 2002, 34, 3096–3129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. De Almeida, N.E.; Paul, D.K.; Karan, K.; Goward, G.R. 1H Solid-State NMR Study of Nanothin Nafion Films. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 1280–1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Pfeffermann, M.; Dong, R.; Graf, R.; Zajaczkowski, W.; Gorelik, T.; Pisula, W.; Narita, A.; Müllen, K.; Feng, X. Free-Standing Monolayer Two-Dimensional Supramolecular Organic Framework with Good Internal Order. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 14525–14532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Blum, F.D. NMR Studies of Organic Thin films. In Annual Reports on NMR Spectroscopy; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1994; pp. 277–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Jagadeesh, B.; Demco, D.E.; Blümich, B. Surface induced order and dynamic heterogeneity in ultra-thin polymer films: A 1H multiple-quantum NMR study. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2004, 393, 416–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Wu, X.; Yang, S.; Samuelson, L.A.; Cholli, A.L.; Kumar, J. Conformation of Azobenzene-Modified Poly(α-L-Glutamate) (AZOPLGA) in Thin Films: Solid State NMR Studies. J. Macromol. Sci. Part A 2004, 41, 1359–1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Alam, T.M.; Friedmann, T.A.; Schultz, P.A.; Sebastiani, D. Low temperature annealing in tetrahedral amorphous carbon thin films observed by 13C NMR spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. B 2003, 67, 245309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Dalvi, L.C.; Laine, C.; Virtanen, T.; Liitiä, T.; Tenhunen, T.-M.; Orelma, H.; Tammelin, T.; Tamminen, T. Study of xylan and cellulose interactions monitored with solid-state NMR and QCM-D. Holzforschung 2020, 74, 643–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Yu, Y.-Y.; Chen, C.-Y.; Chen, W.-C. Synthesis and characterization of organic–inorganic hybrid thin films from poly(acrylic) and monodispersed colloidal silica. Polymer 2003, 44, 593–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Rivillon, S.; Auroy, P.; Deloche, B. Chain Segment Order in Polymer Thin Films on a Non-adsorbing Surface: A NMR Study. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000, 84, 499–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Nieuwendaal, R.C.; DeLongchamp, D.M.; Richter, L.J.; Snyder, C.R.; Jones, R.L.; Engmann, S.; Herzing, A.; Heeney, M.; Fei, Z.; Sieval, A.B.; et al. Characterization of Interfacial Structure in Polymer-Fullerene Bulk Heterojunctions via 13C {2H} Rotational Echo Double Resonance NMR. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018, 121, 026101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Marple, M.A.T.; Wynn, T.A.; Cheng, D.; Shimizu, R.; Mason, H.E.; Meng, Y.S. Local Structure of Glassy Lithium Phosphorus Oxynitride Thin Films: A Combined Experimental and Ab Initio Approach. Angew. Chem. 2020, 59, 22185–22193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Stallworth, P.E.; Vereda, F.; Greenbaum, S.G.; Haas, T.E.; Zerigian, P.; Goldner, R.B. Solid-State NMR Studies of Lithium Phosphorus Oxynitride Films Prepared by Nitrogen Ion Beam-Assisted Deposition. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2005, 152, A516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. MacFarlane, W.A.; Morris, G.D.; Beals, T.R.; Chow, K.H.; Baartman, R.A.; Daviel, S.; Dunsiger, S.R.; Hatakeyama, A.; Kreitzman, S.R.; Levy, C.D.P.; et al. 8Li β-NMR in thin metal films. Physica B 2003, 326, 213–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Mukuda, H.; Tsuchida, T.; Harada, A.; Kitaoka, Y.; Takenouchi, T.; Takano, Y.; Nagao, M.; Sakaguchi, I.; Kawarada, H. 11B-NMR study in boron-doped diamond films. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2006, 7, S37–S40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Yesinowski, J.P. 69,71Ga and 14N high-field NMR of gallium nitride films: 69,71Ga and 14N high-field NMR of gallium nitride films. Phys. Stat. Sol. 2005, 2, 2399–2402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Hope, M.A.; Zhang, B.; Zhu, B.; Halat, D.M.; MacManus-Driscoll, J.L.; Grey, C.P. Revealing the Structure and Oxygen Transport at Interfaces in Complex Oxide Heterostructures via 17O NMR Spectroscopy. Chem. Mater. 2020, 32, 7921–7931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Won, S.; Saun, S.-B.; Lee, S.; Lee, S.; Kim, K.; Han, Y. NMR Spectroscopy for Thin Films by Magnetic Resonance Force Microscopy. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 3189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Aimi, K.; Ando, S. Solid-state 19F MAS and 1H→19F CP/MAS NMR study of the phase-transition behavior of vinylidene fluoride–trifluoroethylene copolymers: 2. semi-crystalline films of VDF 75% copolymer. Polym. J. 2012, 44, 786–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Koseki, Y.; Aimi, K.; Ando, S. Crystalline structure and molecular mobility of PVDF chains in PVDF/PMMA blend films analyzed by solid-state 19F MAS NMR spectroscopy. Polym. J. 2012, 44, 757–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Cui, J.; Kast, M.G.; Hammann, B.A.; Afriyie, Y.; Woods, K.N.; Plassmeyer, P.N.; Perkins, C.K.; Ma, Z.L.; Keszler, D.A.; Page, C.J.; et al. Aluminum Oxide Thin Films from Aqueous Solutions: Insights from Solid-State NMR and Dielectric Response. Chem. Mater. 2018, 30, 7456–7463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Mazaj, M.; Costacurta, S.; Zabukovec Logar, N.; Mali, G.; Novak Tušar, N.; Innocenzi, P.; Malfatti, L.; Thibault-Starzyk, F.; Amenitsch, H.; Kaučič, V.; et al. Mesoporous Aluminophosphate Thin Films with Cubic Pore Arrangement. Langmuir 2008, 24, 6220–6225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Sarou-Kanian, V.; Gleizes, A.N.; Florian, P.; Samélor, D.; Massiot, D.; Vahlas, C. Temperature-Dependent 4-, 5- and 6-Fold Coordination of Aluminum in MOCVD-Grown Amorphous Alumina Films: A Very High Field 27 Al-NMR study. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 21965–21971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Kim, N.; Bassiri, R.; Fejer, M.M.; Stebbins, J.F. The structure of ion beam sputtered amorphous alumina films and effects of Zn doping: High-resolution 27Al NMR. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2014, 405, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Landskron, K. Periodic Mesoporous Organosilicas Containing Interconnected [Si(CH2)]3 Rings. Science 2003, 302, 266–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Hatton, B.D.; Landskron, K.; Whitnall, W.; Perovic, D.D.; Ozin, G.A. Spin-Coated Periodic Mesoporous Organosilica Thin Films? Towards a New Generation of Low-Dielectric-Constant Materials. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2005, 15, 823–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Pallister, P.J.; Barry, S.T. Surface chemistry of group 11 atomic layer deposition precursors on silica using solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. J. Chem. Phys. 2017, 146, 052812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Passos, A.A.; Tavares, M.I.B.; Neto, R.C.P.; Ferreira, A.G. The Use of Solid-State NMR to Evaluate EVA/Silica FILMs. J. Nano R. 2012, 18–19, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Järvinen, J.; Ahokas, J.; Sheludyakov, S.; Vainio, O.; Lehtonen, L.; Vasiliev, S.; Zvezdov, D.; Fujii, Y.; Mitsudo, S.; Mizusaki, T.; et al. Efficient dynamic nu-clear polarization of phosphorus in silicon in strong magnetic fields and at low temperatures. Phys. Rev. B 2014, 90, 214401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Stuart, B.W.; Grant, C.A.; Stan, G.E.; Popa, A.C.; Titman, J.J.; Grant, D.M. Gallium incorporation into phosphate-based glasses: Bulk and thin film properties. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2018, 82, 371–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Riedi, P.C.; Thomson, T.; Tomka, G.J. Chapter 2 NMR of thin magnetic films and superlattices. In Handbook of Magnetic Materials; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1999; pp. 97–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Bibes, M.; Balcells, L.; Valencia, S.; Fontcuberta, J.; Wojcik, M.; Jedryka, E.; Nadolski, S. Nanoscale Multiphase Separation at La2/3Ca1/3MnO3/SrTiO3 Interfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001, 87, 067210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Dang, K.L.; Veillet, P.; Sakakima, H.; Krishnan, R. NMR studies of compositionally modulated Co/Mn thin films. J. Phys. F Met. Phys. 1986, 16, 93–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Wieldraaijer, H.; de Jonge, W.J.M.; Kohlhepp, J.T. 59Co NMR observation of monolayer re-solved hyperfine fields in ultrathin epitaxial FCT-Co(001) films. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2005, 286, 390–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Wojcik, M.; Jay, J.P.; Panissod, P.; Jedryka, E.; Dekoster, J.; Langouche, G. New phases and chemical short range order in co-deposited CoFe thin films with bcc structure: An NMR study. Z. Phys. B Condens. Matter. 1997, 103, 5–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Thomson, T.; Riedi, P.C.; Platt, C.L.; Berkowitz, A.E. NMR studies of sputtered CoFe alloy thin films. IEEE Trans. Magn 1998, 34, 1045–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Hammann, B.A.; Ma, Z.L.; Wentz, K.M.; Kamunde-Devonish, M.K.; Johnson, D.W.; Hayes, S.E. Structural study by solid-state 71 Ga NMR of thin film transistor precursors. Dalton Trans. 2015, 44, 17652–17659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Degen, C.; Tomaselli, M.; Meier, B.H.; Voncken, M.M.A.J.; Kentgens, A.P.M. NMR investigation of atomic ordering in AlxGa1−x as thin films. Phys. Rev. B 2004, 69, 193303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Chandran, C.V.; Schreuders, H.; Dam, B.; Janssen, J.W.G.; Bart, J.; Kentgens, A.P.M.; van Bentum, P.J.M. Solid-State NMR Studies of the Photochromic Effects of Thin Films of Oxygen-Containing Yttrium Hydride. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 22935–22942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Raftery, D.; Long, H.; Reven, L.; Tang, P.; Pines, A. NMR of optically pumped xenon thin films. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1992, 191, 385–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Nossov, A.; Haddad, E.; Guenneau, F.; Mignon, C.; Gédéon, A.; Grosso, D.; Babonneau, F.; Bonhomme, C.; Sanchez, C. The first direct probing of porosity on supported mesoporous silica thin films through hyperpolarised 129Xe NMR. Chem. Commun. 2002, 2476–2477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Hanrahan, M.P.; Men, L.; Rosales, B.A.; Vela, J.; Rossini, A.J. Sensitivity-Enhanced 207Pb Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy for the Rapid, Non-Destructive Characterization of Organolead Halide Perovskites. Chem. Mater. 2018, 30, 7005–7015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Alam, T.M.; Friedmann, T.A.; Jurewicz, A.J.G. Solid State 13C MAS NMR Investigations of Amorphous Carbon Thin Films. In Thin Films: Preparation, Characterization, Applications; Soriaga, M.P., Stickney, J., Bottomley, L.A., Kim, Y.-G., Eds.; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 2002; pp. 277–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Yuan, K.; Hu, T.; Xu, Y.; Graf, R.; Brunklaus, G.; Forster, M.; Chen, Y.; Scherf, U. Engineering the Morphology of Carbon Materials: 2D Porous Carbon Nanosheets for High-Performance Supercapacitors. ChemElectroChem 2016, 3, 822–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Yuan, K.; Hu, T.; Xu, Y.; Graf, R.; Shi, L.; Forster, M.; Pichler, T.; Riedl, T.; Chen, Y.; Scherf, U. Nitrogen-doped porous carbon/graphene nanosheets derived from two-dimensional conjugated microporous polymer sandwiches with promising capacitive performance. Mater. Chem. Front. 2017, 1, 278–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Merwin, L.H.; Johnson, C.E.; Weimer, W.A. 13C NMR investigation of CVD diamond: Correlation of NMR and Raman spectral linewidths. J. Mater. Res. 1994, 9, 631–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Keeler, E.G.; Michaelis, V.K.; Colvin, M.T.; Hung, I.; Gor’kov, P.L.; Cross, T.A.; Gan, Z.; Griffin, R.G. 17O MAS NMR Correlation Spectroscopy at High Magnetic Fields. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 17953–17963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Ashbrook, S.E.; Smith, M.E. Solid state 17O NMR—an introduction to the background principles and applications to inorganic materials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2006, 35, 718–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Grover, R.; Srivastava, R.; Rana, O.; Mehta, D.S.; Kamalasanan, M.N. New Organic Thin-Film Encapsulation for Organic Light Emitting Diodes. JEAS 2011, 1, 23–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Yeh, N.; Yeh, P. Organic solar cells: Their developments and potentials. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 21, 421–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Chandar Shekar, B.; Lee, J.; Rhee, S.-W. Organic thin film transistors: Materials, processes and devices. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2004, 21, 267–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Suzuki, K.; Kubo, S.; Aussenac, F.; Engelke, F.; Fukushima, T.; Kaji, H. Analysis of Molecular Orientation in Organic Semiconducting Thin Films Using Static Dynamic Nuclear Polarization Enhanced Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy. Angew. Chem. 2017, 56, 14842–14846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Chaudhari, R.; Griffin, J.M.; Broch, K.; Lesage, A.; Lemaur, V.; Dudenko, D.; Olivier, Y.; Sirringhaus, H.; Emsley, L.; Grey, C.P. Donor–acceptor stacking arrangements in bulk and thin-film high-mobility conjugated polymers characterized using molecular modelling and MAS and surface-enhanced solid-state NMR spectroscopy. Chem. Sci. 2017, 8, 3126–3136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Park, S.-H.; Alammar, A.; Fulop, Z.; Pulido, B.A.; Nunes, S.P.; Szekely, G. Hydrophobic thin film composite nanofiltration membranes derived solely from sustainable sources. Green Chem. 2021, 23, 1175–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Chisca, S.; Marchesi, T.; Falca, G.; Musteata, V.-E.; Huang, T.; Abou-Hamad, E.; Nunes, S.P. Organic solvent and thermal resistant polytriazole membranes with enhanced mechanical properties cast from solutions in non-toxic solvents. J. Membr. Sci. 2020, 597, 117634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Begni, F.; Paul, G.; Lasseuguette, E.; Mangano, E.; Bisio, C.; Ferrari, M.-C.; Gatti, G. Synthetic Saponite Clays as Additives for Reducing Aging Effects in PIM1 Membranes. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2020, 2, 3481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Ren, D.; Jin, Y.-T.; Liu, T.-Y.; Wang, X. Phenanthroline-Based Polyarylate Porous Membranes with Rapid Water Transport for Metal Cation Separation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 7605–7616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Andrew, E.R.; Bradbury, A.; Eades, R.G. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectra from a Crystal rotated at High Speed. Nature 1958, 182, 1659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Andrew, E.R.; Bradbury, A.; Eades, R.G. Removal of Dipolar Broadening of Nuclear Magnetic resonance Spectra of Solids by Specimen Rotation. Nature 1959, 183, 1802–1803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Alam, T.M.; Fan, H. Investigation of Templated Mesoporous Silicate Thin Films Using High Speed, Solid-State 1H MAS and Double Quantum NMR Spectroscopy. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2003, 204, 2023–2030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Steinbeck, C.A.; Ernst, M.; Meier, B.H.; Chmelka, B.F. Anisotropic Optical Properties and Structures of Block Copolymer/Silica Thin Films Containing Aligned Porphyrin J–Aggregates. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 2565–2573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Lu, D.; Baek, D.J.; Hong, S.S.; Kourkoutis, L.F.; Hikita, Y.; Hwang, H.Y. Synthesis of freestanding single-crystal perovskite films and heterostructures by etching of sacrificial water-soluble layers. Nat. Mater. 2016, 15, 1255–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Liang, X.; Sperling, B.A.; Calizo, I.; Cheng, G.; Hacker, C.A.; Zhang, Q.; Obeng, Y.; Yan, K.; Peng, H.; Li, Q.; et al. Toward Clean and Crackless Transfer of Graphene. ACS Nano 2011, 5, 9144–9153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. VanderHart, L.; Prabhu, V.M.; Lavery, K.A.; Dennis, C.L.; Rao, A.B.; Lin, E.K. Thin-film solid-state proton NMR measurements using a synthetic mica substrate: Polymer blends. J. Magn. Reson. 2009, 201, 100–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Inukai, M.; Noda, Y.; Takeda, K. Nondestructive high-resolution solid-state NMR of rotating thin films at the magic-angle. J. Magn. Reson. 2011, 213, 192–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  125. Inukai, M.; Takeda, K. Studies on multiple-quantum magic-angle-spinning NMR of half-integer quadrupolar nuclei under strong rf pulses with a microcoil. Concepts Magn. Reson. B 2008, 33, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Janssen, H.; Brinkmann, A.; Kentgens, A.P.M. Microcoil High-Resolution Magic Angle Spinning NMR Spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 8722–8723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  127. Yamauchi, K.; Asakura, T. Development of MicroMAS NMR Probehead for Mass-limited Solid-state Samples. Chem. Lett. 2006, 35, 426–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Wensink, H.; Benito-Lopez, F.; Hermes, D.C.; Verboom, W.; Gardeniers, H.J.G.E.; Reinhoudt, D.N.; van den Berg, A. Measuring reaction kinetics in a lab on a chip by microcoil NMR. Lab. Chip 2005, 5, 280–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Massin, C.; Boero, G.; Vincent, F.; Abenhaim, J.; Besse, P.-A.; Popovic, R.S. High-Q factor RF planar microcoils for micro-scale NMR spectroscopy. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2002, 97–98, 280–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Dechow, J.; Forchel, A.; Lanz, T.; Haase, A. Fabrication of NMR—Microsensors for nano-liter sample volumes. Microelectron. Eng. 2000, 53, 517–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Van Bentum, P.J.M.; Janssen, J.W.G.; Kentgens, A.P.M. Towards nuclear magnetic resonance μ-spectroscopy and μ-imaging. Analyst 2004, 129, 793–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  132. Maguire, Y.; Chuang, I.L.; Zhang, S.; Gershenfeld, N. Ultra-small-sample molecular structure detection using microslot waveguide nuclear spin resonance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 9198–9203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  133. Van Bentum, P.J.M.; Janssen, J.W.G.; Kentgens, A.P.M.; Bart, J.; Gardeniers, J.G.E. Stripline probes for nuclear magnetic resonance. J. Magn. Reson. 2007, 189, 104–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Bart, J.; Janssen, J.W.G.; van Bentum, P.J.M.; Kentgens, A.P.M.; Gardeniers, J.G.E. Optimization of stripline-based microfluidic chips for high-resolution NMR. J. Magn. Reson. 2009, 201, 175–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Oosthoek de Vries, A.J.; Bart, J.; Tiggelaar, R.M.; Janssen, J.W.G.; van Bentum, P.J.M.; Gardeniers, H.J.G.E.; Kentgens, A.P.M. Continuous Flow 1H and 13C NMR Spectroscopy in Micro-fluidic Stripline NMR Chips. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 2296–2303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  136. Sidles, J.A. Noninductive detection of single-proton magnetic resonance. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1991, 58, 2854–2856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Sidles, J.A.; Garbini, J.L.; Bruland, K.J.; Rugar, D.; Züger, O.; Hoen, S.; Yannoni, C.S. Magnetic resonance force microscopy. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1995, 67, 249–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Rugar, D.; Budakian, R.; Mamin, H.J.; Chui, B.W. Single spin detection by magnetic resonance force microscopy. Nature 2004, 430, 329–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Rugar, D.; Yannoni, C.S.; Sidles, J.A. Mechanical detection of magnetic resonance. Nature 1992, 360, 563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Rugar, D.; Zuger, O.; Hoen, S.; Yannoni, C.S.; Vieth, H.-M.; Kendrick, R.D. Force Detection of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance. Science 1994, 264, 1560–1563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Mamin, H.J.; Oosterkamp, T.H.; Poggio, M.; Degen, C.L.; Rettner, C.T.; Rugar, D. Isotope-Selective Detection and Imaging of Organic Nanolayers. Nano Lett. 2009, 9, 3020–3024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Leskowitz, G.M.; Madsen, L.A.; Weitekamp, D.P. Force-detected magnetic resonance without field gradients. Solid State Nucl. Magn. Reson. 1998, 11, 73–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Degen, C.L.; Poggio, M.; Mamin, H.J.; Rettner, C.T.; Rugar, D. Nanoscale magnetic resonance imaging. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 1313–1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  144. Verhagen, R.; Wittlin, A.; Hilbers, C.W.; van Kempen, H.; Kentgens, A.P.M. Spatially Resolved Spectroscopy and Structurally Encoded Imaging by Magnetic Resonance Force Microscopy of Quadrupolar Spin Systems. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 1588–1589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Nestle, N.; Schaff, A.; Veeman, W.S. Mechanically detected NMR, an evaluation of the applicability for chemical investigations. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 2001, 38, 1–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Jancso, A.; Correia, J.G.; Gottberg, A.; Schell, J.; Stachura, M.; Szunyogh, D.; Pallada, S.; Lupascu, D.C.; Kowalska, M.; Hemmingsen, L. TDPAC and β-NMR applications in chemistry and biochemistry. J. Phys. G Nucl. Part. Phys. 2017, 44, 064003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  147. Neugart, R.; Balabanski, D.L.; Blaum, K.; Borremans, D.; Himpe, P.; Kowalska, M.; Lievens, P.; Mallion, S.; Neyens, G.; Vermeulen, N.; et al. Precision Measurement of 11Li Moments: Influence of Halo Neutrons on the 9Li Core. Phys. Rev. Lett 2008, 101, 132502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  148. Keim, M.; Georg, U.; Klein, A.; Neugart, R.; Neuroth, M.; Wilbert, S.; Lievens, P.; Vermeeren, L.; Brown, B.A. ISOLDE Collaboration. Measurement of the electric quadrupole moments of 26–29Na. Eur. Phys. J. A 2000, 8, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  149. McKenzie, I.; Chai, Y.; Cortie, D.L.; Forrest, J.A.; Fujimoto, D.; Karner, V.L.; Kiefl, R.F.; Levy, C.D.P.; MacFarlane, W.A.; McFadden, R.M.L.; et al. Direct measurements of the temperature, depth and processing dependence of phenyl ring dynamics in polystyrene thin films by β-detected NMR. Soft Matter 2018, 14, 7324–7334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Brewer, W.D. Recent developments in radiative detection of nuclear magnetic resonance. Hyperfine Interact 1982, 12, 173–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Winnefeld, H.; Czanta, M.; Fahsold, G.; Jänsch, H.J.; Kirchner, G.; Mannstadt, W.; Paggel, J.J.; Platzer, R.; Schillinger, R.; Veith, R.; et al. Electron localization in (7 × 7) re-constructed and hydrogen-covered Si(111) surfaces as seen by NMR on adsorbed Li. Phys. Rev. B 2002, 65, 195319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Koumoulis, D.; Morris, G.D.; He, L.; Kou, X.; King, D.; Wang, D.; Hossain, M.D.; Wang, K.L.; Fiete, G.A.; Kanatzidis, M.G.; et al. Nanoscale β-nuclear magnetic resonance depth imaging of topological insulators. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, E3645–E3650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  153. Mansour, A.I.; Morris, G.D.; Salman, Z.; Chow, K.H.; Dunlop, T.; Jung, J.; Fan, I.; MacFarlane, W.A.; Kiefl, R.F.; Parolin, T.J.; et al. Development of the 8Li cross-relaxation technique: Applications in semiconductors and other condensed matter systems. Physica B Condensed Matter 2007, 401–402, 662–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Chow, K.H.; Salman, Z.; Kiefl, R.F.; MacFarlane, W.A.; Levy, C.D.P.; Amaudruz, P.; Baartman, R.; Chakhalian, J.; Daviel, S.; Hirayama, Y.; et al. The new β-NMR facility at TRI-UMF and applications in semiconductors. Physica B Condensed Matter 2003, 340–342, 1151–1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Cortie, D.L.; Buck, T.; Dehn, M.H.; Karner, V.L.; Kiefl, R.F.; Levy, C.D.P.; McFadden, R.M.L.; Morris, G.D.; McKenzie, I.; Pearson, M.R.; et al. β-NMR Investigation of the Depth-Dependent Magnetic Properties of an Antiferromagnetic Surface. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2016, 116, 106103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  156. Morris, G.D.; MacFarlane, W.A.; Chow, K.H.; Salman, Z.; Arseneau, D.J.; Daviel, S.; Hatakeyama, A.; Kreitzman, S.R.; Levy, C.D.P.; Poutissou, R.; et al. Depth-Controlled β-NMR of 8Li in a Thin Silver Film. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 93, 157601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  157. McKenzie, I.; Daley, C.R.; Kiefl, R.F.; Levy, C.D.P.; MacFarlane, W.A.; Morris, G.D.; Pearson, M.R.; Wang, D.; Forrest, J.A. Enhanced high-frequency molecular dynamics in the near-surface region of polystyrene thin films observed with β-NMR. Soft Matter 2015, 11, 1755–1761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. McKenzie, I.; Harada, M.; Kiefl, R.F.; Levy, C.D.P.; MacFarlane, W.A.; Morris, G.D.; Ogata, S.-I.; Pearson, M.R.; Sugiyama, J. β-NMR Measurements of Lithium Ion Transport in Thin Films of Pure and Lithium-Salt-Doped Poly(ethylene oxide). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 7833–7836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Rossini, A.J.; Zagdoun, A.; Lelli, M.; Lesage, A.; Copéret, C.; Emsley, L. Dynamic Nuclear Polarization Surface Enhanced NMR Spectroscopy. Acc. Chem. Res. 2013, 46, 1942–1951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Elena, B.; Lesage, A.; Steuernagel, S.; Böckmann, A.; Emsley, L. Proton to Carbon-13 INEPT in Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 17296–17302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Agarwal, V.; Reif, B. Residual methyl protonation in perdeuterated proteins for multi-dimensional correlation experiments in MAS solid-state NMR spectroscopy. J. Magn. Reson. 2008, 194, 16–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Baldus, M.; Meier, B.H. Total Correlation Spectroscopy in the Solid State. The Use of Scalar Couplings to Determine the Through-Bond Connectivity. J. Magn. Reson. Ser. A 1996, 121, 65–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Phyo, P.; Hong, M. Fast MAS 1H–13C correlation NMR for structural investigations of plant cell walls. J. Biomol. NMR 2019, 73, 661–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Mance, D.; Sinnige, T.; Kaplan, M.; Narasimhan, S.; Daniëls, M.; Houben, K.; Baldus, M.; Weingarth, M. An Efficient Labelling Approach to Harness Backbone and Side-Chain Protons in 1H-Detected Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy. Angew. Chem. 2015, 54, 15799–15803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  165. Baker, L.A.; Sinnige, T.; Schellenberger, P.; de Keyzer, J.; Siebert, C.A.; Driessen, A.J.M.; Baldus, M.; Grünewald, K. Combined 1H-Detected Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy and Electron Cryotomography to Study Membrane Proteins across Resolutions in Native Environments. Structure 2018, 26, 161–170.e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  166. Roos, M.; Mandala, V.S.; Hong, M. Determination of Long-Range Distances by Fast Magic-Angle-Spinning Radiofrequency-Driven 19F–19F Dipolar Recoupling NMR. J. Phys. Chem. B 2018, 122, 9302–9313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Wang, M.; Lu, M.; Fritz, M.P.; Quinn, C.M.; Byeon, I.-J.L.; Byeon, C.-H.; Struppe, J.; Maas, W.; Gronenborn, A.M.; Polenova, T. Fast Magic-Angle Spinning 19F NMR Spectroscopy of HIV-1 Capsid Protein Assemblies. Angew. Chem. 2018, 57, 16375–16379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Shcherbakov, A.A.; Mandala, V.S.; Hong, M. High-Sensitivity Detection of Nanometer 1H–19F Distances for Protein Structure Determination by 1H-Detected Fast MAS NMR. J. Phys. Chem. B 2019, 123, 4387–4391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Fry, R.A.; Tsomaia, N.; Pantano, C.G.; Mueller, K.T. 19F MAS NMR Quantification of Accessible Hydroxyl Sites on Fiberglass Surfaces. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 2378–2379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Venkatesh, A.; Hanrahan, M.P.; Rossini, A.J. Proton detection of MAS solid-state NMR spectra of half-integer quadrupolar nuclei. Solid State Nucl. Magn. Reson. 2017, 84, 171–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Pöppler, A.-C.; Demers, J.-P.; Malon, M.; Singh, A.P.; Roesky, H.W.; Nishiyama, Y.; Lange, A. Ultrafast Magic-Angle Spinning: Benefits for the Acquisition of Ultrawide-Line NMR Spectra of Heavy Spin-1/2 Nuclei. ChemPhysChem 2016, 17, 812–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Iwasa, Y.; Bascunan, J.; Hahn, S.; Voccio, J.; Kim, Y.; Lecrevisse, T.; Song, J.; Kajikawa, K. A High-Resolution 1.3-GHz/54-mm LTS/HTS NMR Magnet. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond 2015, 25, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Gan, Z.; Hung, I.; Wang, X.; Paulino, J.; Wu, G.; Litvak, I.M.; Gor’kov, P.L.; Brey, W.W.; Lendi, P.; Schiano, J.L.; et al. NMR spectroscopy up to 35.2 T using a series-connected hybrid magnet. J. Magn. Reson. 2017, 284, 125–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Bryce, D.L. New frontiers for solid-state NMR across the periodic table: A snapshot of mod-ern techniques and instrumentation. Dalton Trans. 2019, 48, 8014–8020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Gan, Z.; Gor’kov, P.; Cross, T.A.; Samoson, A.; Massiot, D. Seeking Higher Resolution and Sensitivity for NMR of Quadrupolar Nuclei at Ultrahigh Magnetic Fields. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 5634–5635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Madsen, R.S.K.; Qiao, A.; Sen, J.; Hung, I.; Chen, K.; Gan, Z.; Sen, S.; Yue, Y. Ultrahigh-field 67Zn NMR reveals short-range disorder in zeolitic imidazolate framework glasses. Science 2020, 367, 1473–1476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Ashbrook, S.E.; Sneddon, S. New Methods and Applications in Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy of Quadrupolar Nuclei. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 15440–15456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  178. Hassan, A.; Quinn, C.M.; Struppe, J.; Sergeyev, I.V.; Zhang, C.; Guo, C.; Runge, B.; Theint, T.; Dao, H.H.; Jaroniec, C.P.; et al. Sensitivity boosts by the CPMAS CryoProbe for challenging biological assemblies. J. Magn. Reson. 2020, 311, 106680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. Stebbins, J.F. Anionic speciation in sodium and potassium silicate glasses near the metasilicate ([Na,K]2SiO3) composition: 29Si, 17O, and 23Na MAS NMR. J. Non-Cryst. Solids X 2020, 6, 100049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Qi, G.; Wang, Q.; Xu, J.; Wu, Q.; Wang, C.; Zhao, X.; Meng, X.; Xiao, F.; Deng, F. Direct observation of tin sites and their reversible interconversion in zeolites by solid-state NMR spectroscopy. Commun. Chem. 2018, 1, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Widdifield, C.M. Applications of Solid-State 43Ca Nuclear Magnetic Resonance: Superconductors, Glasses, Biomaterials, and NMR Crystallography. In Annual Reports on NMR Spectroscopy; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 227–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Laurencin, D.; Smith, M.E. Development of 43Ca solid state NMR spectroscopy as a probe of local structure in inorganic and molecular materials. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 2013, 68, 1–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Bryce, D.L. Calcium binding environments probed by 43Ca NMR spectroscopy. Dalton Trans. 2010, 39, 8593–8602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  184. Leroy, C.; Bryce, D.L. Recent advances in solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy of exotic nuclei. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 2018, 109, 160–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. Natusch, D.F.S. Carbon-13 intensity problem. Elimination of the Overhauser effect with an added paramagnetic species. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1971, 93, 2566–2567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Gansow, O.A.; Burke, A.R.; Vernon, W.D. Temperature-dependent carbon-13 nuclear magnetic resonance spectra of the h5-cyclopentadienyliron dicarbonyl dimer, an application of a shiftless relaxation reagent. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 2550–2552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Long, H.W.; Tycko, R. Biopolymer Conformational Distributions from Solid-State NMR:  α-Helix and 310-Helix Contents of a Helical Peptide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 7039–7048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Meinhold, R.H.; MacKenzie, K.J.D. Effect of lanthanides on the relaxation rates of 89Y and 29Si in yttrium silicon oxynitride phases. Solid State Nucl. Magn. Reson. 1995, 5, 151–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Nishiyama, Y.; Fukushima, T.; Fukuchi, M.; Fujimura, S.; Kaji, H. Sensitivity boosting in solid-state NMR of thin organic semiconductors by a paramagnetic dopant of copper phthalo-cyanine. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2013, 556, 195–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Wang, Z.; Hanrahan, M.P.; Kobayashi, T.; Perras, F.A.; Chen, Y.; Engelke, F.; Reiter, C.; Purea, A.; Rossini, A.J.; Pruski, M. Combining fast magic angle spinning dynamic nuclear polarization with indirect detection to further enhance the sensitivity of solid-state NMR spectroscopy. Solid State Nucl. Magn. Reson. 2020, 109, 101685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  191. Berruyer, P.; Björgvinsdóttir, S.; Bertarello, A.; Stevanato, G.; Rao, Y.; Karthikeyan, G.; Casano, G.; Ouari, O.; Lelli, M.; Reiter, C.; et al. Dynamic Nuclear Polarization Enhancement of 200 at 21.15 T Enabled by 65 kHz Magic Angle Spinning. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2020, 11, 8386–8391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Hoehne, F.; Dreher, L.; Franke, D.P.; Stutzmann, M.; Vlasenko, L.S.; Itoh, K.M.; Brandt, M.S. Submillisecond Hyperpolarization of Nuclear Spins in Silicon. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2015, 114, 117602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Can, T.V.; Walish, J.J.; Swager, T.M.; Griffin, R.G. Time domain DNP with the NOVEL sequence. J. Chem. Phys. 2015, 143, 054201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  194. Griffin, R.G. Clear signals from surfaces. Nature 2010, 468, 381–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. W.-Liao, C.; Ghaffari, B.; Gordon, C.P.; Xu, J.; Copéret, C. Dynamic Nuclear Polarization Surface Enhanced NMR spectroscopy (DNP SENS): Principles, protocols, and practice. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2018, 33, 63–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Lesage, A.; Lelli, M.; Gajan, D.; Caporini, M.A.; Vitzthum, V.; Miéville, P.; Alauzun, J.; Rous-sey, A.; Thieuleux, C.; Mehdi, A.; et al. Surface Enhanced NMR Spectroscopy by Dynamic Nuclear Polarization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 15459–15461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  197. Lee, S. Sensitive detection of NMR for thin films. Solid State Nucl. Magn. Reson. 2015, 71, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  198. Kärger, J.; Avramovska, M.; Freude, D.; Haase, J.; Hwang, S.; Valiullin, R. Pulsed field gradient NMR diffusion measurement in nanoporous materials. Adsorption 2021, 27, 453–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Nieuwendaal, R.C.; Ro, H.W.; Germack, D.S.; Kline, R.J.; Toney, M.F.; Chan, C.K.; Agrawal, A.; Gundlach, D.; VanderHart, D.L.; Delongchamp, D.M. Measuring Domain Sizes and Compositional Heterogeneities in P3HT-PCBM Bulk Heterojunction Thin Films with 1H Spin Diffusion NMR Spectroscopy. Adv. Funct. Mater 2012, 22, 1255–1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Sel, O.; To Thi Kim, L.; Debiemme-Chouvy, C.; Gabrielli, C.; Laberty-Robert, C.; Perrot, H. Determination of the Diffusion Coefficient of Protons in Nafion Thin Films by ac Electrogravimetry. Langmuir 2013, 29, 13655–13660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Han, X.; Xu, K.; Taratula, O.; Farsad, K. Applications of nanoparticles in biomedical imaging. Nanoscale 2019, 11, 799–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  202. Mariette, F. Modern Magnetic Resonance; Webb, G.A., Ed.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 1–23. [Google Scholar]
  203. Zhang, J.; MacGregor, R.P.; Balcom, B.J. Liquid crystal diffusion in thin films investigated by PFG magnetic resonance and magnetic resonance imaging. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2008, 461, 106–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Mens, R.; Adriaensens, P.; Lutsen, L.; Swinnen, A.; Bertho, S.; Ruttens, B.; D’Haen, J.; Manca, J.; Cleij, T.; Vanderzande, D.; et al. NMR study of the nanomorphology in thin films of polymer blends used in organic PV devices: MDMO-PPV/PCBM. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2008, 46, 138–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Koller, H.; Weiß, M. Solid State NMR of Porous Materials. In Solid State NMR; Chan, J.C.C., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2011; pp. 189–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Borisov, A.S.; Hazendonk, P.; Hayes, P.G. Solid-State Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy: A Review of Modern Techniques and Applications for Inorganic Polymers. J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. 2010, 20, 183–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Knitsch, R.; Brinkkötter, M.; Wiegand, T.; Kehr, G.; Erker, G.; Hansen, M.R.; Eckert, H. Solid-State NMR Techniques for the Structural Characterization of Cyclic Aggregates Based on Borane–Phosphane Frustrated Lewis Pairs. Molecules 2020, 25, 1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  208. Van der Wel, P.C.A. New applications of solid-state NMR in structural biology. Emerg. Top. Life Sci. 2018, 2, 57–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  209. Rodin, V.V. NMR techniques in studying water in biotechnological systems. Biophys. Rev. 2020, 12, 683–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  210. El Hariri El Nokab, M.; van der Wel, P.C.A. Use of solid-state NMR spectroscopy for investigating polysaccharide-based hydrogels: A review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 240, 116276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  211. Krushelnitsky, A.; Reichert, D.; Saalwächter, K. Solid-State NMR Approaches to Internal Dynamics of Proteins: From Picoseconds to Microseconds and Seconds. Acc. Chem. Res. 2013, 46, 2028–2036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  212. Molugu, T.R.; Lee, S.; Brown, M.F. Concepts and Methods of Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy Applied to Biomembranes. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 12087–12132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Zhao, W.; Fernando, L.D.; Kirui, A.; Deligey, F.; Wang, T. Solid-state NMR of plant and fungal cell walls: A critical review. Solid State Nucl. Magn. Reson. 2020, 107, 101660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Simpson, A.J.; Simpson, M.J.; Soong, R. Environmental Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy: An Overview and a Primer. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 628–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Brunner, E.; Rauche, M. Solid-state NMR spectroscopy: An advancing tool to analyse the structure and properties of metal–organic frameworks. Chem. Sci. 2020, 11, 4297–4304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  216. Piveteau, L.; Morad, V.; Kovalenko, M.V. Solid-State NMR and NQR Spectroscopy of Lead-Halide Perovskite Materials. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 19413–19437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  217. Seifrid, M.; Reddy, G.N.M.; Chmelka, B.F.; Bazan, G.C. Insight into the structures and dynamics of organic semiconductors through solid-state NMR spectroscopy. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2020, 5, 910–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Marchetti, A.; Chen, J.; Pang, Z.; Li, S.; Ling, D.; Deng, F.; Kong, X. Understanding Surface and Interfacial Chemistry in Functional Nanomaterials via Solid-State NMR. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1605895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Nanomaterials 11 01494 g001 550
Figure 1. 11B NMR spectrum for the (111) film, the fitted red curve shows 2 boron sites, which are identified as B(1) blue and B(2) green, respectively. Reproduced with permission [73]. Copyright 2006, Taylor & Francis. www.tandfonline.com. (accessed on April 2021).
Figure 1. 11B NMR spectrum for the (111) film, the fitted red curve shows 2 boron sites, which are identified as B(1) blue and B(2) green, respectively. Reproduced with permission [73]. Copyright 2006, Taylor & Francis. www.tandfonline.com. (accessed on April 2021).
Nanomaterials 11 01494 g001
Nanomaterials 11 01494 g002 550
Figure 2. (a) 17O NMR spectrum for CeO2-SrTiO3 nanopillar lift-off isotopically enriched films. (b,c) DFT-calculated isotopic chemical shifts as a function of distance from the interface of different interfacial structures. Three structure interfaces of the simple model and a low-energy structure were found from random structure searching in 0° interface (b) and 45° interface (c). Reproduced with permission. [76] Copyright 2020, American Chemical Society.
Figure 2. (a) 17O NMR spectrum for CeO2-SrTiO3 nanopillar lift-off isotopically enriched films. (b,c) DFT-calculated isotopic chemical shifts as a function of distance from the interface of different interfacial structures. Three structure interfaces of the simple model and a low-energy structure were found from random structure searching in 0° interface (b) and 45° interface (c). Reproduced with permission. [76] Copyright 2020, American Chemical Society.
Nanomaterials 11 01494 g002
Nanomaterials 11 01494 g003 550
Figure 3. 31P CSA NMR spectra for POPy2 film with (black) and without (gray) DNP enhancement: (a) vacuum-deposited on SiO2 (12 sheets), (b) drop-cast on SiO2 (15 sheets) and (c) vacuum-deposited on SiO2 (1 sheets). Reproduced with permission. [111] Copyright 2017, Angewandte Chemie, Wiley-VCH.
Figure 3. 31P CSA NMR spectra for POPy2 film with (black) and without (gray) DNP enhancement: (a) vacuum-deposited on SiO2 (12 sheets), (b) drop-cast on SiO2 (15 sheets) and (c) vacuum-deposited on SiO2 (1 sheets). Reproduced with permission. [111] Copyright 2017, Angewandte Chemie, Wiley-VCH.
Nanomaterials 11 01494 g003
Nanomaterials 11 01494 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) 13C DNP-CPMAS NMR spectra for DPP-DTT bulk polymer with (upper spectrum) and without (lower spectrum) DNP enhancement. (b) 1H-13C DNP-HETCOR NMR spectra for DPP-DTT bulk polymer. (c) 1H-13C DNP-HETCOR NMR spectra for the drop-cast film. (d) 13C DNP-CPMAS NMR spectra for DPP-DTT drop-cast (red) and spin-coated (blue) films. Reproduced with permission. [112] Copyright 2017, The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Figure 4. (a) 13C DNP-CPMAS NMR spectra for DPP-DTT bulk polymer with (upper spectrum) and without (lower spectrum) DNP enhancement. (b) 1H-13C DNP-HETCOR NMR spectra for DPP-DTT bulk polymer. (c) 1H-13C DNP-HETCOR NMR spectra for the drop-cast film. (d) 13C DNP-CPMAS NMR spectra for DPP-DTT drop-cast (red) and spin-coated (blue) films. Reproduced with permission. [112] Copyright 2017, The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Nanomaterials 11 01494 g004
Nanomaterials 11 01494 g005 550
Figure 5. (a) A schematic description for the disk MAS design, including its fit in the NMR probe (b) a side and front view of a 4 mm pencil type rotor (Agilent technology, Inc.) with an attached 12 mm quartz disk, and (c) a photograph of the square quartz substrate. Reproduced with permission. [124] Copyright 2011, Elsevier.
Figure 5. (a) A schematic description for the disk MAS design, including its fit in the NMR probe (b) a side and front view of a 4 mm pencil type rotor (Agilent technology, Inc.) with an attached 12 mm quartz disk, and (c) a photograph of the square quartz substrate. Reproduced with permission. [124] Copyright 2011, Elsevier.
Nanomaterials 11 01494 g005
Nanomaterials 11 01494 g006 550
Figure 6. Parameters that are varied for optimization of the resolution. Reproduced with permission. [134] Copyright 2009, Elsevier.
Figure 6. Parameters that are varied for optimization of the resolution. Reproduced with permission. [134] Copyright 2009, Elsevier.
Nanomaterials 11 01494 g006
Nanomaterials 11 01494 g007 550
Figure 7. (a) A schematic description of the MRFM setup and (b) showing the original cantilever tip where the sample is deposited (appearing dark). Reproduced with permission. [77] Copyright 2013, Nature.
Figure 7. (a) A schematic description of the MRFM setup and (b) showing the original cantilever tip where the sample is deposited (appearing dark). Reproduced with permission. [77] Copyright 2013, Nature.
Nanomaterials 11 01494 g007
Nanomaterials 11 01494 g008 550
Figure 8. A schematic description of the β-NMR setup where the experiment starts with a 4 s long 8Li+ pulse, followed by the β particles emitted anisotropically during the decay of spin-polarized nuclei. The β trajectory (orange line) is shown hitting the detector. Reproduced with permission. [149] Copyright 2017, The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Figure 8. A schematic description of the β-NMR setup where the experiment starts with a 4 s long 8Li+ pulse, followed by the β particles emitted anisotropically during the decay of spin-polarized nuclei. The β trajectory (orange line) is shown hitting the detector. Reproduced with permission. [149] Copyright 2017, The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Nanomaterials 11 01494 g008
Table
Table 1. A summary of the most suitable solid-state NMR techniques for the chemically different thin-film types. MAS: magic angle spinning; DNP: dynamic nuclear polarization; MRFM: magnetic resonance force microscopy.
Table 1. A summary of the most suitable solid-state NMR techniques for the chemically different thin-film types. MAS: magic angle spinning; DNP: dynamic nuclear polarization; MRFM: magnetic resonance force microscopy.
NMR Active NucleiChemical ConnectivitySolid State NMR TechniqueReferences
1HOrganic/Inorganic1D, 2D MAS and multiple quantum[61,62,63,64]
2HOrganic1D, 2D MAS[69,70]
7,8LiInorganic1D MAS and β-NMR[71,72,73]
11BInorganic1D MAS[74]
13COrganic1D, 2D MAS[65,66,67,68]
14,15NInorganicHigh-field NMR[72,75]
17OInorganicfast MAS, isotopic enrichment[76]
19FOrganic/Inorganic1D MAS, MRFM[77,78,79]
27AlInorganic1D, 2D MAS, high-field NMR[80,81,82,83]
29SiOrganic/Inorganic1D MAS[84,85,86,87]
31POrganic/Inorganic1D, 2D MAS, DNP[71,72,86,88,89]
55MnInorganicNMR relaxometry[90,91,92]
59CoInorganicNMR relaxometry[93,94,95]
69,71GaInorganicHigh-field NMR[75,96]
75AsInorganic1D MAS[97]
89YInorganic1D MAS[98]
129XeInorganicHyper-polarization[99,100]
207PdInorganicFast MAS, DNP[101]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

El Hariri El Nokab, M.; Sebakhy, K.O. Solid State NMR Spectroscopy a Valuable Technique for Structural Insights of Advanced Thin Film Materials: A Review. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 1494. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11061494

AMA Style

El Hariri El Nokab M, Sebakhy KO. Solid State NMR Spectroscopy a Valuable Technique for Structural Insights of Advanced Thin Film Materials: A Review. Nanomaterials. 2021; 11(6):1494. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11061494

Chicago/Turabian Style

El Hariri El Nokab, Mustapha, and Khaled O. Sebakhy. 2021. "Solid State NMR Spectroscopy a Valuable Technique for Structural Insights of Advanced Thin Film Materials: A Review" Nanomaterials 11, no. 6: 1494. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11061494

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop