Next Article in Journal
Free-Standing rGO-CNT Nanocomposites with Excellent Rate Capability and Cycling Stability for Na2SO4 Aqueous Electrolyte Supercapacitors
Next Article in Special Issue
Low-Temperature Growth of ZnO Nanowires from Gravure-Printed ZnO Nanoparticle Seed Layers for Flexible Piezoelectric Devices
Previous Article in Journal
Fabrication, Microstructure and Colloidal Stability of Humic Acids Loaded Fe3O4/APTES Nanosorbents for Environmental Applications
Previous Article in Special Issue
Dimensional Roadmap for Maximizing the Piezoelectrical Response of ZnO Nanowire-Based Transducers: Impact of Growth Method
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 11
Issue 6
10.3390/nano11061419
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Environment-Friendly Zinc Oxide Nanorods-Grown Cellulose Nanofiber Nanocomposite and Its Electromechanical and UV Sensing Behaviors

by
Lindong Zhai
1,
Hyun-Chan Kim
1,
Ruth M. Muthoka
1,
Muhammad Latif
1,
Hussein Alrobei
2,
Rizwan A. Malik
3 and
Jaehwan Kim
1,*
1
CRC for Nanocellulose Future Composites, Inha University, Incheon 22212, Korea
2
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Prince Sattam bin Abdul Aziz University, AlKharj 11942, Saudi Arabia
3
Department of Metallurgy and Materials Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Taxila 47050, Pakistan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2021, 11(6), 1419; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11061419
Submission received: 25 April 2021 / Revised: 26 May 2021 / Accepted: 26 May 2021 / Published: 27 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue ZnO Nanowires: Growth, Properties, and Energy Applications)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This paper reports a genuine environment-friendly hybrid nanocomposite made by growing zinc oxide (ZnO) nanorods on cellulose nanofiber (CNF) film. The nanocomposite preparation, characterizations, electromechanical property, and ultraviolet (UV) sensing performance are explained. CNF was extracted from the pulp by combining the 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl radical (TEMPO) oxidation and the aqueous counter collision (ACC) methods. The CNF film was fabricated using doctor blade casting, and ZnO nanorods were grown on the CNF film by seeding and by a hydrothermal method. Morphologies, optical transparency, mechanical and electromechanical properties, and UV sensing properties were examined. The nanocomposite’s optical transparency was more than 80%, and the piezoelectric charge constant d31 was 200 times larger than the CNF film. The UV sensing performance of the prepared ZnO-CNF nanocomposites was tested in terms of ZnO concentration, UV irradiance intensity, exposure side, and electrode materials. A large aspect ratio of ZnO nanorods and a work function gap between ZnO nanorods and the electrode material are essential for improving the UV sensing performance. However, these conditions should be compromised with transparency. The use of CNF for ZnO-cellulose hybrid nanocomposite is beneficial not only for electromechanical and UV sensing properties but also for high mechanical properties, renewability, biocompatibility, flexibility, non-toxicity, and transparency.

1. Introduction

Organic and inorganic functional nanocomposites combine advantages of the individual materials that surpass parental material properties. They can achieve high mechanical strength, electrical conductivity, thermal conductivity, antibacterial, gas barrier, flame retardancy, electromagnetic shielding, optical transparency, energy harvesting, and actuating properties [1]. Cellulose nanofiber (CNF) is an outstanding organic material composed of nano-sized cellulose fibrils with a high aspect ratio [2,3,4,5,6,7]. The width of CNF is typically in the range of 5–20 nm, and its length is typically up to several micrometers. Cellulose molecules can form microfibrils during the biosynthesis process by forming inter- and intra-molecular hydrogen bonds [4]. CNF extracted from plants by the top-down approach has excellent properties: not only renewability, biodegradability, abundance, low price, and light weight but also high optical transparency, outstanding mechanical properties, and low thermal expansion coefficient [6]. Thus, CNF can be a building block of future materials applied for structural composites, coatings, cosmetics, 3D printing, sensors, soft actuators, flexible electronics, energy devices, and flexible displays [8,9,10,11,12,13].
Inorganic nanomaterials can improve the functional properties of organic-inorganic functional nanocomposites. The inorganic nanomaterials can be either blended or coated with/on the polymer nanocomposites [14,15]. Owing to its benefits in terms of wide bandgap (3.37 eV), high exciton binding energy (60 meV), ultraviolet (UV) response, optical transparency, highly electrical conductivity, and piezoelectricity, zinc oxide (ZnO) has been widely studied [16,17]. ZnO is broadly used in electronic devices, hybrid diodes, energy harvesters, piezoelectric devices, field-effect transistors, gas sensors, photovoltaics, and UV sensors [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. It can be quickly grown on various substrates, including metal, glass, silicon, sapphire, plastics, polymers, and cellulose [20,26,27,28,29,30,31,32].
With increasing interest in wearable devices, the ZnO-cellulose hybrid composite is attractive because it can bridge ZnO’s functional properties and renewability and flexibility of cellulose. Recently ZnO nanorods grown on paper and cellulose have been reported [33,34,35,36,37,38]. A flexible and transparent cellulose-ZnO hybrid nanocomposite was prepared by direct ZnO seeding and hydrothermal ZnO nanorod growth on a regenerated cellulose film [35,36]. A zinc oxide nanolayer was uniformly formed on a regenerated cellulose film using a solution-based hydrothermal process, which shows a drastic improvement of its electromechanical behavior [37]. However, they used regenerated cellulose, which was prepared using special solvents, such as LiCl/DMAc [39]. It is essential to use CNF film instead of regenerated cellulose in cellulose-ZnO hybrid nanocomposites because the particular solvent usage can be eliminated.
Thus, this research aimed to prepare a genuine environment-friendly ZnO-CNF nanocomposite (ZCN) by growing ZnO nanorods on a CNF film according to the hydrothermal method. By using CNF instead of regenerated cellulose, the genuine environment-friendly ZnO-cellulose nanocomposite was prepared. Since CNF possesses numerous hydroxyl groups on its surface, ZnO can be efficiently anchored on the CNF film surface. This paper illustrates the CNF isolation, CNF film preparation, and the ZnO nanorods growth on the CNF film. The ZnO nanorods were grown by adopting the seeding process, followed by the hygrothermal process [37]. The morphologies, optical transparency, mechanical, electromechanical, and UV sensing properties of the prepared ZCN were investigated.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Hardwood (HW) pulp was received from Hansol Paper and Pulp Co. (Jeonju, Korea). HW bleached kraft pulp in dried pad form is a combination of Aspen and Poplar, and its alpha-cellulose (α) content is 85.7%, and viscosity is 14.6 cPs. 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl radical (TEMPO, 98%), sodium bromide (NaBr, 99%), sodium hypochlorite (NaClO, 15%), and hydrochloric acid (HCl, 37%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich St. Louis, MO, USA, and Sodium hydroxide (NaOH, 98%) was purchased from Daejung Chemical, Busan, Korea. They were used to oxidize HW pulp further to extract CNF. Zinc acetate dihydrate (Zn(CH3COO)2·2H2O, reagent grade 98%) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, and ethyl alcohol anhydrous (C2H5OH, purity 99.5%) was purchased from Daejung Chemical. Zinc nitrate hexahydrate (Zn(NO3)2·6H2O, reagent grade 98%) and hexamethylenetetramine (HMT, (CH2)6N4, reagent grade 99%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. All other chemicals used were analytical-reagent-grade (Purity > 99%) and used as received.

2.2. CNF Extraction and CNF Film Fabrication

The CNF was extracted by the TEMPO oxidation and aqueous counter collision system (ACC, ACCNAC-100, CNNT, Suwon, Korea) combined method, which has been reported previously [40]. The TEMPO oxidation acts as a pretreatment process for the ACC process. In brief, the HW pulp was cut into small pieces and swelled in deionized (DI) water for one day before disintegrating by a food mixer for 10 min. After that, TEMPO, NaBr, and DI water were added to the swollen HW pulp suspension. To start the oxidization process, the NaClO was added into the mixture and stirred at room temperature. A pH meter (Orion Star A211, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to monitor the mixture’s pH value, maintaining it at 12 by adding NaOH. To stop the TEMPO oxidation reaction, 0.5 M HCl was added into the mixture and adjusted the pH value to 7. Finally, the oxidized cellulose pulp was washed with DI water to remove the chemical residues using a 90 μm mesh sieve. The TEMPO-oxidized pulp was further pulverized using the ACC system. The pulp was passed through a pair of diamond nozzles in a collision chamber with 200 MPa, such that a pair of aqueous solution jets collide against each other, resulting in an aqueous CNF suspension. The number of ejections passing through the nozzles was called “pass” As the number of passes increases, the CNF size decreases. TEMPO oxidation 60 min and ACC 30-pass-treated CNF was an optimum condition from the previous research [40], and the same condition was used in this research. The CNF suspension was degassed using a centrifuge machine (Supra 22K, Hanil Scientific Inc., Incheon, Korea) with 5000 rpm, 1 h.
The CNF film was prepared using a doctor blade casting, as shown in Figure 1. A polycarbonate (PC) substrate was used for the CNF film casting. The PC substrate, where its boundaries were covered with the polyimide tape, was treated with an oxygen plasma using an oxygen-plasma treatment system (FEMTO Science, CUTE, Hwaseong-si, Korea) for 20 s to slightly increase its hydrophilicity of the PC substrate. The CNF suspension was cast on the plasma-treated PC plate using a doctor blade and dried in a cleanroom. After drying, the pristine CNF film was immersed in an ethanol bath for separating the pristine CNF film from the PC substrate. After evaporating ethanol, the pristine CNF film was peeled off from the PC substrate.

2.3. ZnO-CNF Nanocomposite Fabrication

The previously reported two-step process was adopted for growing ZnO nanorods on the CNF film: ZnO nanoparticles seeding and the ZnO nanorod growing [35]. In brief, the CNF film was fixed on a silicon wafer to maintain its flatness. Zinc acetate was dissolved in ethanol by stirring under 60 °C for 1 h, and the solution temperature was maintained at 60 °C to prevent ZnO crystal extraction. The solution was then spin-coated on the CNF film, followed by drying at 100 °C. This process was repeated 10 times with 3 min duration to form a dense ZnO seeding layer on top of the CNF film. After that, the ZnO-seeded CNF film was annealed at 100 °C for 30 min. Figure 2a shows the ZnO seeding process.
For growing ZnO nanorods, zinc nitrate aqueous solution and HMT aqueous solution were mixed. After the ZnO-seeded CNF film was floated on the surface of zinc nitrate aqueous solution, the solution was heated up to 90 °C for 1 h. As the nanorods grew, the CNF film color was changed from transparent to hazy then perfectly white. After growing ZnO nanorods, the nanocomposite was dried at room temperature. By controlling the chemical concentration, 25 mM and 50 mM of ZnO growing solutions were used to fabricate two ZCNs: 25 mM ZCN and 50mM ZCN. Figure 2b shows the schematic of the ZCN fabrication process.

2.4. Characterizations

A UV-2501PC UV-Vis spectrometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) was used to analyze the transparency of the pristine CNF film and ZCNs. Field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) (S-4000, Hitachi, Matsuda, Japan) was used to investigate the morphologies of the pristine CNF film and ZCNs.
The mechanical and electromechanical properties were measured using a tensile test system, which consists of a load cell (UU-K010, Dacell, Nami-Myeon, Korea), a servo motor controller, a picoammeter (Keithley 6485, Tektronix, Beaverton, OR, USA), an environmental chamber, and LabVIEW software (National Instruments, Austin, TX, USA)) with a personal computer [41]. Aluminum electrodes were deposited on both sides of specimens by a thermal evaporation system (SHE-6D-350T, Samhan, Paju, Korea). Thin copper wires were connected to the electrodes and grounded to release space charges accumulated on the electrodes during the deposition. The electromechanical property was found by measuring the piezoelectric charge constant, d31, in the tensile test system. The specimens were subjected to a tensile load in its length direction, and the induced current was measured across the thickness direction from the electrodes using the picoammeter. The induced current can be converted into a charge per unit electrode area, and d31 can be obtained as:
d 31 = ∂ D 3 ∂ T 1 E = Induced   charge   per   unit   electrod   area Applied   in − plane   normal   stress   [ C / N ]

2.5. UV Sensing Test

Figure 3a shows the schematic of UV sensing from ZCN. The ZCN was cut into 1.7 × 1.7 cm2, and then platinum or indium tin oxide (ITO) was coated with 1.5 × 1.5 cm2 size using a sputtering system (K575X, Quorum Technologies Ltd., Lewes, UK) to form electrodes on both side of the specimens. Thin copper wires were attached to both electrodes using a conductive silver paste and then coated with a thin laminate film to protect the ZnO layer. Before proceeding with the UV sensing test, the specimen was attached on a linear stage such that the distance between the UV light source and the specimen can be adjusted (see Figure 3b). A UV light lamp (PL-S 9W/2P BLB, Philips, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) of 365 nm wavelength was used as the light source. The UV irradiance intensity was measured using a UV meter (UV-A Meter, Kuhnast, Wächtersbach, Germany), which has the highest sensitivity at 360 nm wavelength. UV irradiance intensities of 1, 1.5, 3, and 5 mW/cm2 were applied to the specimens. For evaluating the UV sensing performance, the induced current was measured using the picoammeter. The UV irradiance was exposed to the cellulose side and ZnO side, and the exposure side effect was also investigated.

3. Results

3.1. Optical Transparencies and Morphologies

Figure 4 shows the transparency of the prepared ZCNs and the pristine CNF film. The pristine CNF film showed the highest transparency of 89.2% in the visible light range, and the ZCNs exhibited high transparencies of 82.9% and 80.7% for the 25 mM and 50 mM ZnO concentrations. Within the UV wavelength range up to 370 nm, the ZCNs mostly block UV light, indicating that the ZnO nanorods adsorb most UV lights.
Figure 5 shows the surface and cross-sectional morphologies of the pristine CNF film and ZCNs. The pristine CNF film surface is very smooth, and its cross-section exhibits a layered structure similar to the regenerated cellulose [42]. The ZnO nanorods were successfully grown vertically from the surface of CNF film, and their lengths of the 25 mM and 50 mM specimens are 500 nm and 800 nm. The vertically grown ZnO nanorods are beneficial for improving optical transparency and electromechanical properties. The ZnO nanorod morphologies are similar to the previous report [35]. The ZnO nanorod diameter was similar to the previous result, 110 nm [35]. Lower optical transparency of the 50 mM ZCN was attributed to the longer ZnO nanorods than the 25 mM ZCN.

3.2. Mechanical and Electromechanical Properties

The mechanical and electromechanical properties of the pristine CNF and ZCNs were measured. Figure 6a shows the stress-strain curves of the specimens. The yielding occurred around 0.8–1.2% strain, and by fitting the slopes of the stress-strain curves within the elastic region, Young’s moduli were found. The results are listed in Table 1. The tensile strength (St) of the pristine CNF film was 131.4 MPa, which is a bit larger than the regenerated cellulose film (120 MPa, no-stretching) [42]. The Young’s modulus of the pristine CNF film was 12.8 GPa, much larger than the regenerated cellulose film (5.3 GPa, no-stretching). The CNF pristine film’s mechanical properties increase might be associated with the CNF alignment in the pristine CNF film. Thus, it is beneficial to use the pristine CNF film instead of the regenerated cellulose film for the ZCN.
After ZnO nanorod growing, the tensile strength of ZCNs ranged 115–116 MPa, and Young’s modulus was in the range of 9.6–9.7 GPa, a bit less than the pristine CNF film. The decreased mechanical properties might be due to the material mismatch between the CNF film and the grown ZnO nanorods. Note that the thickness of the ZnO nanorod layers was 0.5–0.8 μm, and the CNF film thickness was 20 μm. The grown ZnO nanorods cannot resist under the tensile load because they were grown perpendicular to the CNF film. Thus, although the ZnO layer thickness was smaller than the CNF film, the overall mechanical properties of ZCN were decreased.
Figure 6b shows the charge-strain curves of the pristine CNF film and ZCNs. Strain-induced charges increased with increasing the ZnO concentration within the elastic region. The piezoelectric charge constant, d31, of the pristine CNF film was 0.22 pC/N. This value is lower than the regenerated-cellulose electro-active paper (EAPap) without stretching, 3.4 pC/N [42]. Note that the d31 of the regenerated cellulose EAPap drastically increased up to 16–17 pC/N as the stretching ratio increased to 2.0 [42,43]. The d31 values of the 25 mM and 50 mM ZCNs were 26 and 48.8 pC/N. The maximum d31 of the 50 mM ZCN is 14 times larger than the regenerated cellulose EAPap, and 200 times larger than the pristine CNF film. The remarkable electromechanical property is attributed to the dipolar orientation of ZnO nanorods and surface piezoelectricity between the CNF film and the ZnO nanorods.

3.3. UV Sensing Test

The prepared ZCNs were UV-sensing-tested. The ZnO concentration effect on the UV sensing was investigated. Figure 7 shows the induced current from the ZCNs depending on the ZnO concentration when the UV light was on and off under 5 mW/cm2 UV irradiance. As the UV light was on, the current output from ZCNs sharply increased and saturated within 20–30 s. The 50 mM ZCN, however, gradually decreased after the saturation. After the UV light was off, the current output of ZCNs immediately decreased and returned to the nearly initial level after 120 s. Note that the current outputs are repeatable. The 50 mM ZCN exhibited almost four times higher current output than the 25 mM ZCN, which might be associated with the ZnO nanorods’ length. Since bigger ZnO nanorods in the 50 mM ZCN (800 nm) than the 25 mM ZCN (500 nm) give a larger surface area, more oxygen molecules can be attracted on the ZnO nanorods, such that larger current output can be obtained from the 50 mM ZCN than the 25 mM ZCN.
Figure 8a,b show the induced current outputs of ZCNs under the UV irradiance change. By controlling the distance between the UV light source and the specimens, the UV irradiance intensity was measured using the UV-A meter, and the intensity levels were 1, 1.5, 3, and 5 mW/cm2. Both 25 mM and 50 mM ZCNs were tested under the same condition. As the UV irradiance turned on and off with increasing the UV irradiance intensity, the current outputs followed the intensity signals and the maximum current outputs increased. Figure 8c shows the maximum current outputs of ZCNs with the UV irradiance change. The 25 mM ZCN exhibited a linear response, whereas the 50 mM ZCN represented a nonlinear response, which might be due to its large current output.
Since the ZCN has two different sides, the UV exposure side effect was investigated by irradiating UV light onto the ZnO nanorods side and cellulose side. Figure 9 represents the induced current outputs of ZCNs by exposing UV irradiance to ZnO nanorods side and cellulose side for the 25 mM ZCN (a) and 50 mM ZCN (b). The test was performed under 3 mW/cm2 UV irradiance intensity. In the 25 mM ZCN, the current output from the cellulose side was slightly larger than the ZnO nanorods side. However, the 50 mM ZCN was different: the current output from the cellulose side was almost twice higher than the ZnO nanorods side. The CNF film is transparent, and the interface boundary between the CNF film and the ZnO seed layer is smoother than the ZnO nanorods side. The cellulose side scattered the UV irradiance less than the ZnO nanorods side, such that more current output occurred from the cellulose-side exposure [35].
So far, Pt was coated on both sides of ZCNs to form electrodes. To investigate the electrode material effect on the UV sensing performance, a transparent electrode material, ITO, was coated on both sides of the ZCNs and compared with the Pt electrode. Figure 10 shows the current output of the 25 mM ZCN (a) and the 50 mM ZCN (b) for both electrode materials. Inset photographs show the images of the Pt- and ITO-coated ZCNs. Note that ITO is known to be transparent at 365 nm in contrast to Pt. Thus the ITO-coated ZCN is beneficial for achieving a transparent UV sensor. The Pt electrode ones showed larger current output than the ITO electrode cases in 25 mM and 50 mM ZCNs. The Pt-electrode-induced current was 1.8 times larger than the ITO electrode, and the 50 mM ZCN was 3 times larger. This phenomenon might be associated with the work function difference between the electrode and ZnO nanorods: ZnO work function is 4.3 eV, Pt is 5.7 eV, and ITO is around 4.3 eV [44]. The large work function gap between the ZnO and the electrode induced high current output under the same UV irradiance intensity. Since the work function of ITO electrode is almost the same as the ZnO, the ITO electrode did not show large current outputs. The Pt electrode on the ZnO nanorods could correspond to Schottky contact, which results in a large forward current and very low reverse bias. Additionally, the conductivity of the ITO electrode is lower than the Pt electrode. Note that the ITO electrode’s current outputs dropped quickly after turning on the UV light. It might be because the oxygen atoms incorporated into the ITO electrode decrease the oxygen vacancies and then give rise to the ITO electrode’s high resistivity, which resulted in fast current decay.
The UV sensing performance of ZCN was compared with the previously reported cellulose-ZnO hybrid nanocomposite (CEZOHN) [35]. CEZOHN is a ZnO-nanorod hybrid nanocomposite grown on a regenerated cellulose film. Figure 11a shows the peak current outputs of the ZCNs compared with the CEZOHN as the UV irradiation intensity changes. The current outputs were normalized with the electrode areas, and the ZCNs were recapped from Figure 8c. The peak current outputs increased with the UV irradiation intensity, and the CEZOHN exhibited higher UV sensing performance than the ZCNs. The high performance of UV sensing was investigated with the ZnO nanorod length. The ZCNs used the same ZnO seeding and growing process as the CEZOHN. Note that the CEZOHN used a 50 mM concentration of zinc nitrate aqueous solution for growing the ZnO nanorods. Figure 11b represents the unit current output of ZCNs and CEZOHN with the length of the nanorods. The unit current output was calculated from the maximum peak current outputs divided by the UV irradiation intensity, which turned out to be nA/mW. The ZnO nanorods’ length of CEZOHN was 1 μm, and the ZC was 500 nm and 800 nm. Table 2 represents the photosensitivities of the prepared ZCNs comparing with CEZOHN. The peak current increased from 59.69 ± 2.57 to 212.53 ± 9.09 nA for the 25 mM and 50 mM ZCNs, and their unit current output increased from 11.94 ± 0.51 to 42.51 ± 1.82 nA/mW/cm2. It is clearly shown that the current output is strongly related to the ZnO nanorods’ length. Thus, a large aspect ratio of ZnO nanorods is crucial for improving the UV sensing performance. A significant work function difference between ZnO nanorods and the electrode material should be made for performance improvement. However, the large aspect ratio of ZnO nanorods and considerable work function electrode material could deteriorate the ZCN’s transparency. Thus, they should be compromised with the transparency of ZCN. Nevertheless, the use of CNF for ZCN is beneficial for high mechanical properties, renewability, biocompatibility, flexibility, non-toxicity, and transparency.

4. Conclusions

In this study, the environment-friendly ZnO-CNF nanocomposites were fabricated by growing ZnO nanorods on the CNF film using two-step methods: seeding and nanorod growing by the hydrothermal method. The CNF extraction, the film casting, the ZnO nanorod growing, and all characterization were performed. The tensile strength and Young’s modulus of the CNF film (120 MPa, 12.8 GPa) were higher than the regenerated cellulose film (120 MPa, 5.3 GPa). Thus, it is beneficial to use the CNF film instead of the regenerated cellulose film to form the nanocomposites. Transparency of the ZnO-CNF nanocomposites slightly decreased from the pristine CNF film but still maintained more than 80%. The SEM images exhibited that the ZnO nanorods were grown uniformly on the CNF film surface, and the length of the nanorods was 500 nm and 800 nm for 25 mM and 50 mM ZnO concentration nanocomposites. After growing ZnO nanorods on the CNF film, the electromechanical property was increased more than 200 times compared to the pristine CNF film. As the ZnO concentration increased, the electromechanical property increased.
The UV sensing performance of the prepared ZnO-CNF nanocomposites was tested in terms of ZnO concentration, UV irradiance intensity, exposure side, and electrode materials. When increasing the ZnO concentration and UV irradiance intensity, the induced current output also increased. When the cellulose side was exposed to the UV irradiance, the induced current was higher than the ZnO nanorods-side exposure. Due to the transparency and smooth surface of the CNF film, it scattered UV irradiance less than the ZnO nanorods side. Regarding the electrode materials, the Pt electrode generated larger current output than the ITO electrode, which is associated with the work function difference between the electrode material and the ZnO nanorods.
The UV sensing performance of the ZnO-CNF nanocomposite and the previously reported regenerated cellulose-based ZnO hybrid nanocomposite was compared. The current output from the regenerated cellulose-based one was higher than the ZnO-CNF nanocomposites, attributed to the ZnO nanorods’ length. When increasing the length of the nanorods, the current output also increased. The high aspect ratio of ZnO nanorods in conjunction with the work function gap between ZnO nanorods and the electrode material are essential to improve the UV sensing performance, although they should be compromised with the transparency. The use of CNF for ZnO-cellulose hybrid nanocomposites is beneficial not only for electromechanical and UV sensing properties but also for high mechanical properties, renewability, biocompatibility, flexibility, non-toxicity, and transparency.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.Z. and J.K.; Data curation and experiments, R.M.M. and H.-C.K.; Writing—original draft preparation, L.Z.; Visualization, R.M.M. and M.L.; Writing—review and editing, H.A., R.A.M. and J.K.; Supervision, J.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Deanship of Scientific Research at Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University under research project no. 2020/1/17063.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tressler, J.F.; Alkoy, S.; Dogan, A.; Newnham, R.E. Functional composites for sensors, actuators and transducers. Compos. Part. A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 1999, 30, 477–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Marchessault, R.H.; Liang, C.Y. Infrared spectra of crystalline polysaccharides. III. Mercerized cellulose. J. Polym. Sci. 1960, 43, 71–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Moon, R.J.; Martini, A.; Nairn, J.; Simonsen, J.; Youngblood, J. Cellulose nanomaterials review: Structure, properties and nanocomposites. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 3941–3994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Klemm, D.; Kramer, F.; Moritz, S.; Lindström, T.; Ankerfors, M.; Gray, D.; Dorris, A. Nanocelluloses: A new family of nature-based materials. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 5438–5466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mokhena, T.C.; John, M.J. Cellulose nanomaterials: New generation materials for solving global issues. Cellulose 2020, 27, 1149–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dufresne, A. Nanocellulose: A new ageless bionanomaterial. Mater. Today 2013, 16, 220–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ray, U.; Zhu, S.; Pang, Z.; Li, T. Mechanics design in cellulose-enabled high-performance functional materials. Adv. Mater. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Cherian, B.M.; Leão, A.L.; de Souza, S.F.; Costa, L.M.M.; de Olyveira, G.M.; Kottaisamy, M.; Nagarajan, E.R.; Thomas, S. Cellulose nanocomposites with nanofibres isolated from pineapple leaf fibers for medical applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 2011, 86, 1790–1798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Aulin, C.; Gällstedt, M.; Lindström, T. Oxygen and oil barrier properties of microfibrillated cellulose films and coatings. Cellulose 2010, 17, 559–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chen, J.; Huang, X.; Zhu, Y.; Jiang, P. Cellulose nanofiber supported 3D interconnected BN nanosheets for epoxy nanocomposites with ultrahigh thermal management capability. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017, 27, 1604754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kim, J.; Yun, S.; Ounaies, Z. Discovery of cellulose as a smart material. Macromolecules 2006, 39, 4202–4206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kafy, A.; Sadasivuni, K.K.; Akther, A.; Min, S.-K.; Kim, J. Cellulose/graphene nanocomposite as multifunctional electronic and solvent sensor material. Mater. Lett. 2015, 159, 20–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kafy, A.; Sadasivuni, K.K.; Kim, H.-C.; Akther, A.; Kim, J. Designing flexible energy and memory storage materials using cellulose modified graphene oxide nanocomposites. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 5923–5931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Gomez-Romero, P. Hybrid organic-inorganic materials—In search of synergic activity. Adv. Mater. 2001, 13, 163–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sanchez, C.; Julián, B.; Belleville, P.; Popall, M. Applications of hybrid organic-inorganic nanocomposites. J. Mater. Chem. 2005, 15, 3559–3592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Özgür, Ü.; Alivov, Y.I.; Liu, C.; Teke, A.; Reshchikov, M.A.; Doğan, S.; Avrutin, V.; Cho, S.-J.; Morkoç, H. A comprehensive review of ZnO materials and devices. J. Appl. Phys. 2005, 98, 041301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Jayadevan, K.P.; Tseng, T.Y. One-dimensional ZnO nanostructures. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2012, 12, 4409–4457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, X.; Song, J.; Liu, J.; Wang, Z.L. Direct-current nanogenerator driven by ultrasonic waves. Science 2007, 316, 102–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Chu, S.; Li, D.; Chang, P.-C.; Lu, J.G. Flexible dye-sensitized solar cell based on vertical ZnO nanowire arrays. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2010, 6, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Yao, I.C.; Tseng, T.-Y.; Lin, P. ZnO nanorods grown on polymer substrates as UV photodetectors. Sens. Actuator A Phys. 2012, 178, 26–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Nanto, H.; Minami, T.; Takata, S. Zinc-oxide thin-film ammonia gas sensors with high sensitivity and excellent selectivity. J. Appl. Phys. 1986, 60, 482–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Swanwick, M.E.; Pfaendler, S.M.L.; Akinwande, A.I.; Flewitt, A.J. Near-ultraviolet zinc oxide nanowire sensor using low temperature hydrothermal growth. Nanotechnology 2012, 23, 344009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Park, T.; Kim, N.; Kim, D.; Kim, S.-W.; Oh, Y.; Yoo, J.-K.; You, J.; Um, M.-K. An organic/inorganic nanocomposite of cellulose nanofibers and ZnO nanorods for highly sensitive, reliable, wireless, and wearable multifunctional sensor applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 48239–48248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Rodwihok, C.; Choopun, S.; Ruankham, P.; Gardchareon, A.; Phadungdhitidhada, S.; Wongratanaphisan, D. UV sensing properties of ZnO nanowires/nanorods. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 477, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Park, T.; Lee, K.E.; Kim, N.; Oh, Y.; Yoo, J.K.; Um, M.-K. Aspect ratio-controlled ZnO nanorods for highly sensitive wireless ultraviolet sensor applications. J. Mater. Chem. C 2017, 46, 12256–12263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kar, J.P.; Das, S.N.; Choi, J.H.; Lee, Y.A.; Lee, T.Y.; Myoung, J.M. Fabrication of UV detectors based on ZnO nanowires using silicon microchannel. J. Cryst. Growth 2009, 311, 3305–3309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Khan, A.; Hussain, M.; Nur, O.; Willander, M. Mechanical and piezoelectric properties of zinc oxide nanorods grown on conductive textile fabric as an alternative substrate. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2014, 47, 345102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhou, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Cai, Z. Low-temperature growth of ZnO nanorods on PET fabrics with two-step hydrothermal method. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2010, 256, 4724–4728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ladanov, M.; Ram, M.K.; Matthews, G.; Kumar, A. Structure and opto-electrochemical properties of ZnO nanowires grown on n-Si substrate. Langmuir 2011, 27, 9012–9017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Asib, N.A.M.; Husairi, F.S.; Eswar, K.A.; Afaah, A.N.; Mamat, M.H.; Rusop, M.; Khusaimi, Z. Developing high-sensitivity UV sensors based on ZnO nanorods grown on TiO2 seed layer films using solution immersion method. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2020, 302, 111827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, X.; Ren, S.; He, X.; Dong, L.; Bai, W.; Lei, T.; Chen, H. Preparation and characterization of cellulose nanofiber/zinc oxide composite Films. J. Biobased Mater. Bioenergy 2020, 14, 203–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Fan, B.; Yao, Q.; Wang, C.; Xiong, Y.; Sun, Q.; Jin, C. Spawns structure of rod-like ZnO wrapped in cellulose nanofibers for electromagnetic wave absorption. J. Nanomater. 2017, 2017, 6329072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Manekkathodi, A.; Lu, M.-Y.; Wang, C.W.; Chen, L.-J. Direct growth of aligned zinc oxide nanorods on paper substrates for low-cost flexible electronics. Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 4059–4063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Gullapalli, H.; Vemuru, V.S.M.; Kumar, A.; Botello-Mendez, A.; Vajtai, R.; Terrones, M.; Nagarajaiah, S.; Ajayan, P.M. Flexible piezoelectric ZnO-paper nanocomposite strain sensor. Small 2010, 6, 1641–1646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Mun, S.; Kim, H.C.; Ko, H.-U.; Zhai, L.; Kim, J.W.; Kim, J. Flexible cellulose and ZnO hybrid nanocomposite and its UV sensing characteristics. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2017, 18, 437–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Ko, H.-U.; Mun, S.; Min, S.-K.; Kim, G.-W.; Kim, J. Fabrication of cellulose ZnO hybrid nanocomposite and its strain sensing behavior. Materials 2014, 7, 7000–7009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Mun, S.; Ko, H.-U.; Zhai, L.; Min, S.-K.; Kim, H.-C.; Kim, J. Enhanced electromechanical behavior of cellulose film by zinc oxide nanocoating and its vibration energy harvesting. Acta Mater. 2016, 114, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. John, A.; Ko, H.-U.; Kim, D.-G.; Kim, J. Preparation of cellulose-ZnO hybrid films by a wet chemical method and their characterization. Cellulose 2011, 18, 675–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Nayak, J.N.; Chen, Y.; Kim, J. Removal of impurities from cellulose films after their regeneration from cellulose dissolved in DMAc/LiCl solvent system. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2008, 47, 1702–1706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hai, L.V.; Zhai, L.; Kim, H.C.; Kim, J.W.; Choi, E.S.; Kim, J. Cellulose nanofibers isolated by TEMPO-oxidation and aqueous counter collision methods. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 191, 65–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yun, S.; Kim, J. Mechanical, electrical, piezoelectric and electro-active behavior of aligned multi-walled carbon nanotube/cellulose composites. Carbon 2011, 49, 518–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Yang, C.; Kim, J.-H.; Kim, J.-H.; Kim, J.; Kim, H.S. Piezoelectricity of wet drawn cellulose electro-active paper. Sens. Actuator A Phys. 2009, 154, 117–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Yun, S.; Kim, J.H.; Li, Y.; Kim, J. Alignment of cellulose chains of regenerated cellulose by corona poling and its piezoelectricity. J. Appl. Phys. 2008, 103, 083301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Schlaf, R.; Murata, H.; Kafafi, Z.H. Work function measurements on indium tin oxide films. J. Electron. Spectros. Relat. Phenomena 2001, 120, 149–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nanomaterials 11 01419 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic of CNF film fabrication process.
Figure 1. Schematic of CNF film fabrication process.
Nanomaterials 11 01419 g001
Nanomaterials 11 01419 g002 550
Figure 2. Schematic of ZnO-CNF nanocomposite fabrication process: (a) seeding process and (b) nanorod growing process.
Figure 2. Schematic of ZnO-CNF nanocomposite fabrication process: (a) seeding process and (b) nanorod growing process.
Nanomaterials 11 01419 g002
Nanomaterials 11 01419 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) Schematic of UV sensing ZCN and (b) UV-sensing test setup.
Figure 3. (a) Schematic of UV sensing ZCN and (b) UV-sensing test setup.
Nanomaterials 11 01419 g003
Nanomaterials 11 01419 g004 550
Figure 4. Optical transparencies of the pristine CNF film and ZnO-CNF nanocomposites.
Figure 4. Optical transparencies of the pristine CNF film and ZnO-CNF nanocomposites.
Nanomaterials 11 01419 g004
Nanomaterials 11 01419 g005 550
Figure 5. Surface (a–c) and cross-sectional (d–f) FESEM images: (a,d) the pristine CNF film, (b,e) 25 mM ZCN, (c,f) 50 mM ZCN.
Figure 5. Surface (a–c) and cross-sectional (d–f) FESEM images: (a,d) the pristine CNF film, (b,e) 25 mM ZCN, (c,f) 50 mM ZCN.
Nanomaterials 11 01419 g005
Nanomaterials 11 01419 g006 550
Figure 6. (a) Stress-strain curves and (b) induced charge curves of the pristine CNF film and ZCNs.
Figure 6. (a) Stress-strain curves and (b) induced charge curves of the pristine CNF film and ZCNs.
Nanomaterials 11 01419 g006
Nanomaterials 11 01419 g007 550
Figure 7. Induced current outputs of ZCNs with different ZnO concentrations.
Figure 7. Induced current outputs of ZCNs with different ZnO concentrations.
Nanomaterials 11 01419 g007
Nanomaterials 11 01419 g008 550
Figure 8. Induced current outputs of ZCNs: (a) 25 mM ZCN, (b) 50 mM ZCN, and (c) the UV irradiance intensity effect.
Figure 8. Induced current outputs of ZCNs: (a) 25 mM ZCN, (b) 50 mM ZCN, and (c) the UV irradiance intensity effect.
Nanomaterials 11 01419 g008
Nanomaterials 11 01419 g009 550
Figure 9. Current outputs of ZCNs with different UV irradiate sides: (a) 25 mM ZCN and (b) 50 mM ZCN.
Figure 9. Current outputs of ZCNs with different UV irradiate sides: (a) 25 mM ZCN and (b) 50 mM ZCN.
Nanomaterials 11 01419 g009
Nanomaterials 11 01419 g010 550
Figure 10. Platinum and ITO electrodes’ effect on the ZCN: (a) 25 mM ZCN and (b) 50 mM ZCN.
Figure 10. Platinum and ITO electrodes’ effect on the ZCN: (a) 25 mM ZCN and (b) 50 mM ZCN.
Nanomaterials 11 01419 g010
Nanomaterials 11 01419 g011 550
Figure 11. Current output comparison of ZCNs and CEZOHN: (a) peak current outputs with UV intensity changing and (b) the maximum unit current output with the ZnO nanorods’ length.
Figure 11. Current output comparison of ZCNs and CEZOHN: (a) peak current outputs with UV intensity changing and (b) the maximum unit current output with the ZnO nanorods’ length.
Nanomaterials 11 01419 g011
Table
Table 1. Mechanical and electromechanical properties of the pristine CNF and ZCNs.
Table 1. Mechanical and electromechanical properties of the pristine CNF and ZCNs.
SampleE (GPa)St (MPa)d31 (pC/N)
Pristine CNF film12.8 ± 0.1131.4 ± 3.70.22 ± 0.1
25 mM ZCN9.6 ± 1.4116.0 ± 1226 ± 5.6
50 mM ZCN9.7 ± 0.3115.0 ± 13.748.8 ± 11.7
Regenerated cellulose EAPap [36]5.31203.4
Table
Table 2. Photosensitivities of the ZCNs compared with CEZOHN.
Table 2. Photosensitivities of the ZCNs compared with CEZOHN.
SampleZCNsCEZOHN
25 mM ZCN50 mM ZCN
Peak current (nA/cm2)59.69 ± 2.57212.53 ± 9.09142.5
Unit current output (nA/mW/cm2)11.94 ± 0.5142.51 ± 1.82124.0
ZnO nanorod size (nm)5008001000
Response time (s)703525
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhai, L.; Kim, H.-C.; Muthoka, R.M.; Latif, M.; Alrobei, H.; Malik, R.A.; Kim, J. Environment-Friendly Zinc Oxide Nanorods-Grown Cellulose Nanofiber Nanocomposite and Its Electromechanical and UV Sensing Behaviors. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 1419. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11061419

AMA Style

Zhai L, Kim H-C, Muthoka RM, Latif M, Alrobei H, Malik RA, Kim J. Environment-Friendly Zinc Oxide Nanorods-Grown Cellulose Nanofiber Nanocomposite and Its Electromechanical and UV Sensing Behaviors. Nanomaterials. 2021; 11(6):1419. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11061419

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhai, Lindong, Hyun-Chan Kim, Ruth M. Muthoka, Muhammad Latif, Hussein Alrobei, Rizwan A. Malik, and Jaehwan Kim. 2021. "Environment-Friendly Zinc Oxide Nanorods-Grown Cellulose Nanofiber Nanocomposite and Its Electromechanical and UV Sensing Behaviors" Nanomaterials 11, no. 6: 1419. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11061419

APA Style

Zhai, L., Kim, H.-C., Muthoka, R. M., Latif, M., Alrobei, H., Malik, R. A., & Kim, J. (2021). Environment-Friendly Zinc Oxide Nanorods-Grown Cellulose Nanofiber Nanocomposite and Its Electromechanical and UV Sensing Behaviors. Nanomaterials, 11(6), 1419. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11061419

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop