Next Article in Journal
Enhanced Performance and Diffusion Robustness of Phase-Change Metasurfaces via a Hybrid Dielectric/Plasmonic Approach
Next Article in Special Issue
Pore Modification and Phosphorus Doping Effect on Phosphoric Acid-Activated Fe-N-C for Alkaline Oxygen Reduction Reaction
Previous Article in Journal
Study of the Correlation between the Amorphous Indium-Gallium-Zinc Oxide Film Quality and the Thin-Film Transistor Performance
Previous Article in Special Issue
Ruling Factors in Cinnamaldehyde Hydrogenation: Activity and Selectivity of Pt-Mo Catalysts
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:

Biobased Carbon Dots: From Fish Scales to Photocatalysis

Department of Molecular Sciences and Nanosystems, Università Ca’ Foscari di Venezia, Via Torino 155, 30172 Venezia Mestre, Italy
Division of Material Science, Department of Engineering Sciences and Mathematichs, Luleå University of Technology, 971 87 Luleå, Sweden
The European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, 38043 Grenoble CEDEX 9, France
Partnership for Soft Condensed Matter PSCM, ESRF The European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, 71 Avenue des Martyrs, 38043 Grenoble CEDEX 9, France
CNR-IOM, Institut Laue Langevin, 71, Avenue des Martyrs, 38042 Grenoble CEDEX 9, France
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2021, 11(2), 524;
Received: 11 January 2021 / Revised: 25 January 2021 / Accepted: 14 February 2021 / Published: 18 February 2021


The synthesis, characterization and photoreduction ability of a new class of carbon dots made from fish scales is here described. Fish scales are a waste material that contains mainly chitin, one of the most abundant natural biopolymers, and collagen. These components make the scales rich, not only in carbon, hydrogen and oxygen, but also in nitrogen. These self-nitrogen-doped carbonaceous nanostructured photocatalyst were synthesized from fish scales by a hydrothermal method in the absence of any other reagents. The morphology, structure and optical properties of these materials were investigated. Their photocatalytic activity was compared with the one of conventional nitrogen-doped carbon dots made from citric acid and diethylenetriamine in the photoreduction reaction of methyl viologen.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The term “circular economy” is currently recognized as one of the drivers for research in chemistry, as it is the science that holds the key for the recovery of waste and its conversion into useable materials, chemicals and products.
A yet untapped source of biowaste derives from the fish (catch and farming) industries. In fact, in 2016 the worldwide fish production amounted to 171 million tons, where China was the major productor [1]. Furthermore, the average consumption of fish has increased in the past forty years from 12.6 to 19.8 kg per person [2].
The estimated waste from fisheries is still a matter of debate, with yearly quantities varying in a wide range. However, though this scenario is not completely clear, the resulting amount of fish biowaste is in the order of dozens of million tons per year [3]; this could represent a resource of sustainable chemical richness [4]. Fish residues are comprised of whole waste fish, head, viscera, skin, bones, etc., and their composition is variable according to the specie, sex, age, time of the year and geographic area. However, all fish biowaste contains several valuable molecules such as oils, collagen, chitin, gelatin and pigments [5]. Nowadays, the most common option for the treatment of such waste is a low-tech solution for the obtainment of fishmeal: A product used in the animal feed and fertilizer sectors [6,7]. Despite this, in recent years, various processes and technologies have been reported for the upgrade to high added-value products from fishery waste [8,9].
In this work we studied the possibility of valorization of bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) scales, using them as the carbon source for the synthesis of Carbon Dots (CDs): Luminescent carbon nanomaterials. Bass is a common fish in the Northern Adriatic Sea and its farming and consumption are well spread in Northern Italy. The choice of using scales as the carbon source was made based on their composition. In fact, they represent an inexpensive, accessible source of nitrogen-containing biomass that does not directly impact the food chain. The principal components of fish scales are collagen, chitin, minerals, lipids and pigments. Chitin is the main organic component and is a natural nitrogen containing polysaccharide (poly-β(1/4)-N-acetyl-D-glucosamine) that provides an efficient precursor for the N-doped CDs [10].
Thanks to their superiority in water solubility, chemical inertness, low toxicity, ease of functionalization and resistance to photobleaching, CDs have inspired intensive research efforts in recent years [11,12].
These nanoparticles have drawn considerable attention in a wide range of applications, ranging from biomedical [13,14,15] to energy-related fields [16,17]. Among them, CDs appeared to be a promising luminescent bio-based nanomaterial for photocatalytic applications; however, to date, the photocatalytic activity of CDs has been under-explored despite their remarkable light harvesting properties and excellent electron donor/acceptor capabilities. Moreover, most reported photosystems of CDs are limited by the co-presence of precious metal complexes or enzymes as redox mediators [18,19,20].
The accurate design of CDs with tunable photoelectric properties is one of the major issues faced to achieve a breakthrough in this field. In particular, many efforts have been focused on the doping of CDs with nitrogen and it has been demonstrated that nitrogen doping can significantly enhance their properties and thus expand their applications [21,22].
In one of our previous works, we demonstrated that the carbon source and synthetic procedures diversely affect the structural and optical properties of the CDs, which in turn influence their photoelectron transfer ability [23]. Six different types of CDs, made from citric acid, glucose or fructose and using two different synthetic pathways (hydrothermal or pyrolytic), were tested for the photoreduction of methyl viologen. Overall, citric acid-CDs were found to provide the best photocatalytic performance. This led us to further investigate the citric acid CDs and their photoreduction ability. With this purpose four different CDs were synthesized by using two different methods (hydrothermal and pyrolytic) and two sets of reagents (neat citric acid and a mixture of citric acid and diethylenetriamine). The photocatalytic activity of the nanoparticles was investigated on the model photoreduction of methyl viologen. The most active CDs in the photoreduction was shown to be the amorphous N-doped CDs (a-N-CDs, obtained with hydrothermal treatment using citric acid and diethylenetriamine as reagents) [24]. For this reason, in this work, we decided to compare the new class of carbon nanomaterials from fish scales (bass-CDs) with a-N-CDs for the photoreduction of methyl viologen.
In recent years, the preparation of carbon nanoparticles from biomass is starting to be investigated because biomass carbon sources are widely available, inexpensive, green and safe starting materials. Compared to molecular carbon sources, biomass, and in particular waste biomass, has therefore many advantages [25]. Moreover, biomass naturally contains heteroatoms in contrast with man-made carbon sources that require external addition [26]. In recent literature, various types of biomasses have been used as carbon sources to synthesize CDs, such as walnut peel [27], papaya juice [28], goose feather [29] and bee pollen [30], and they have been applied to various fields: Bio-imaging, sensors, drug delivery and others. Fish scales have also been recently described for the preparation of fluorescent nanomaterials with applications in different fields. Zhang et al. [10], for example, reported a facile synthesis route for the preparation of CDs from grass carp scales for the detection of hypochlorite. Another work shows how fish scale-derived CDs could be used also for the determination of the presence of ferric ions in real water samples and human serum [31]. Carbon dots produced from fishery waste were synthesized also from Kai et al. [32] and used for the detection of pharmaceuticals molecules as lidocaine hydrochloride. Another application of fish scale-derived CDs is in the biomedical field: Alshatwi et al. [33], for example, produce simultaneously hydroxyapatite and carbon nanoparticles from Lethrinus lentjan scales applicable for bio-imaging and bone-tissue engineering applications. In this context, however, the photocatalytic activity of this type of CDs is still underexplored.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

All the reagents were purchased from Merck Life Science S.r.l. (Milano, Italy), were of analytical grade and used without further purification. MilliQ water was used as a solvent throughout the experiment and it was obtained with a Merck Millipore C79625 system.
The scales were of sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) and were purchased from a local market. Before use, the scales were washed thoroughly with water and dried in a vacuum oven at 70 °C overnight. Figure 1 summarizes the unit operations from scales to CDs.

2.2. Synthesis of CDs from Fish Scales

In a typical experiment 2 g of dried and grounded fish scales were put in a Teflon-lined autoclave with 20 mL of MilliQ water. The system was heated at 200 °C for 24 h. The obtained brownish suspension was filtered, and the water was removed by rotary evaporation to obtain a brown solid with 30–50% yield.
For some studies the CDs were further purified via dialysis: A total of 200 mg was dispersed in 3 mL of milliQ water and dialyzed for 24 h using a 1KDa dialysis membrane in 2 L milliQ water. The resulted purified CDs were obtained with 2–6% yield.

2.3. Characterization of CDs

The physical characterization of the nanoparticles was determined by CHNS elemental analysis, Fourier-Transform Infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy, X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS), Small Angle X-Ray Scattering (SAXS) and Static Light Scattering (SLS).
CHNS analysis was performed on an Elemental Unicube (Elementar Italia Srl, Lomazzo, Italy) and FT-IR spectra have been recorded on a Perkin-Elmer Spectrum One FT-IR spectrometer (PerkinElmer Italia, Milano, Italy) at wavenumbers ranging from 400 to 4000 cm−1. XPS was performed with a Perkin Elmer Φ 5600ci spectrometer (PerkinElmer Italia, Milano, Italy) in the 10−7 Pa pressure range, by using nonmonochromatic Al Kα radiation (1486.6 eV). The binding energy (BE) values are referred to the Fermi level. BE scale calibration was confirmed by the position of both Au4f7/2 and Cu2p3/2 bands in pure metal samples, falling, respectively, at 84.0 and 932.6 eV. Wide range survey spectra were recorded for all the sample. Single spectra were recorded for C1s, O1s and N1s regions. The recorded XPS bands were fitted using a non-linear least-square fitting procedure adopting a Shirley-type background and Gaussian–Lorentzian peak shapes for all the peaks (XPSPEAK41 free software, 4.1, Raymund W.M. Kwok, Hong Kong, China). The BE correction from the surface charging evidenced during analysis (around 2–3 eV) was done by using as internal reference, with the position at 284.6 eV of the C1s band related to C=C bonds [24], checking, in addition, the consistency of the BE positions of all the other bands evidenced in the different XPS peaks. The BE values final uncertainty was not larger than 0.2 eV. The atomic composition of the analyzed region (about 5–10 nm of thickness from the surface) was estimated by using sensitivity factors provided by Φ V5.4A software (Perkin Elmer, Physical Electronics, Eden Prairie, MN, USA): The relative uncertainty of the atomic fraction of the different elements was lower than 0.1.
SAXS measurements were performed at the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF; Grenoble, France) on the ID02 beamline [34], using an X-ray wavelength of ~0.1 nm. Two sample-to-detector distances (SDD) were used (1 and 8 m) to obtain a Q-range of 0.0008–0.74 Å−1 (Q = scattering angle). Scattering patterns were collected by taking 10 successive exposures of 0.05 s to reduce radiation damage. The measured two-dimensional scattering patterns were normalized to an absolute intensity scale and azimuthally averaged to obtain the one-dimensional scattering profiles. The corresponding background was then subtracted before the profiles, from different SDDs, were merged. The one-dimensional SAXS profiles were analyzed using the SasView software [35].
Static Light Scattering (SLS) measurements were performed using a Malvern Zetasizer (Malvern Products, Palaiseau, France) with a He-Ne laser light source (633 nm). The measurements were carried out at 25.0 °C for a duration of 30 s for each one, and the samples were dispersed in water, filtered at 0.22 mm and placed in 1 mL cuvettes.
The high-resolution Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM, Oxford Instruments Cypher Asylum Research, available at the AFM platform of the PSCM at Grenoble) was used in tapping mode to investigate dimensions and morphology of the obtained nanoparticles or of their aggregates. The samples were prepared in accordance with the standard procedures using a spin coater.
For the optical characterization of CDs, an UV–Vis spectrophotometer Agilent 8456 (Agilent Technologies Italia, Milano, Italy) and photoluminescence excitation (PLE) were used and emission (PL) spectra were recorded by a Perkin Elmer LS 55 fluorescence spectrophotometer (PerkinElmer Italia, Milano, Italy).
1H, 13C{1H}, DOSY NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker AV 300 (1H: 300 MHz; 13C: 75.5 MHz; 51V: 78.28 MHz) spectrometer (Bruker GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). For 1H and 13C{1H} NMR, the chemical shifts (δ) were reported in parts per million (ppm) relative to the residual undeuterated solvent as an internal reference.

2.4. Photoreduction of Methyl Viologen (MV)

A solution composed by 0.1 M of EDTA, 60 µM of MV with an absorbance normalized amount of CDs (a.b.s. = 0.13 a.u.; 0.005 mg/mL a-N-CDs, 0.2 mg/mL bass-CDs) were placed under inert atmosphere in a quartz cuvette. The solutions were then irradiated at 365 nm fixed wavelength emission (Hangar s.r.l.; ATON LED-UV 365; 80 W/m2 of irradiance in the UVA spectral range 315–400 cm−1). The progress of the reactions was monitored using an UV spectrophotometer following the formation of the typical absorption band of the reduced MV+. radical cation form centered at 605 nm, and its concentration was estimated using ε = 13,700 M−1 cm−1. The same experiment was conducted also using the same concentration of bass-CDs and a-N-CDs (0.2 mg/mL).
A series of blank reaction were also performed to assess the effectiveness of the CDs in catalyzing the reduction of MV (E = −0.45 V vs NHE). All the blank tests performed reveal that CDs is essential to guarantee the effectiveness of the photochemical reduction of the MV.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Synthesis and Characterization of Bass-CDs

All the carbonaceous nanoparticles were synthesized by hydrothermal treatment as previously reported [23,24].
The nanoparticles made from the waste bass scales were obtained in 30–50%wt yields. This variability was probably due to the different composition of the scales depending on season, fish age, sex, habitat, etc. The lower yields, compared with the 72% yield of a-N-CDs, clearly indicate that a high fraction of the biomass is not convertible into CDs. In fact, fish scales also contain a large fraction of minerals such as CaCO3 (27–47% [36,37,38]). An average composition of the scales was obtained by elemental analysis as reported in Table 1.
An exploratory test for the removal of minerals from scales was also performed. Bass scales were pre-treated by stirring in 0.25 M HCl for 30 min at room temperature followed by rinsing to neutral pH and drying. The demineralized scales were then employed to synthesize CDs by hydrothermal treatment (200 °C, 24 h). The CDs made from demineralized scales were CHNS analyzed showing a C:N ratio of 3.2; the same as for the bass-CDs obtained from non-demineralized scales. This implies that the minerals present in the fish scales are not involved in the formation of the nanoparticles. Based on this evidence, all the following CDs syntheses were performed without demineralizing the scales. The photocatalytic ability of the CDs obtained after dialysis and of the demineralized ones were compared to that of the CDs made by simple treatment of the scales and showed no significant difference.
When the bass-CDs were dialyzed, the obtained purified yields were 2–6%. The resulting materials were predominantly carbonaceous solids as confirmed by the silent 1H, 13C {1H} and two-dimensional (2D) DOSY NMR spectra (Figures S1–S3). The NMR experiments excluded the presence of soluble molecular and/or oligomeric species. On the other hand, the a-N-CDs were sufficiently small to completely permeate the membrane, probably indicative of a significant formation of molecular-like fluorophores.
In our previous work [23], we showed that the synthetic procedure (hydrothermal vs pyrolytic) determines the morphology of the CDs. Hydrothermal treatment—used in the present case—yields predominantly amorphous CDs lacking a graphitic core.
The morphology, composition and surface properties of the nanoparticles were studied by Small Angle X-Ray Scattering (SAXS), Static Light Scattering (SLS), Fourier Transform InfraRed (FT-IR) spectroscopy, X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS), Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) and elemental analysis.
The elemental composition of the nanoparticles indicated a C:N ratio of 3.2 for both the bass-CDs and the a-N-CDs used for comparison (Table 1). This result allowed to conclude that the CDs synthesized from bass scales have the same amount of nitrogen as the a-N-CDs, without the need of any doping agent.
The surface morphology of the nanoparticles was evaluated by FT-IR and XPS and the results are summarized in Table 2.
FT-IR analysis (spectrum in Figure S4) showed a broad absorption band around 3400 cm−1 corresponding to the O−H vibrations and a peak around 3300 cm−1 due to the N–H stretching. The strong absorption bands around 1700−1600 cm−1 reflected the presence of carboxylic acid, ketone and amide groups. Multiple signals in the region between 1600–1400 cm−1 were assigned to both C–C stretching of aromatic or conjugated double bonds and to the N–H bending of the N-containing groups.
The XPS wide range spectrum of bass-CDs evidenced bands related to the presence of carbon, oxygen, and nitrogen. The quantitative analysis obtained by the intensity of C1s, O1s and N1s single spectra gave a relative composition of 66% carbon, 26% oxygen and 8% nitrogen (for a-N-CDs, the ratio was 70:20:10 of C:O:N). XPS analysis gave a different C/N ratio in respect to CHNS, because this technique refers only to the surface of the nanoparticles, whereas elemental analysis is related to the whole composition of the material. With this in mind, it can be highlighted that for both bass-CDs and a-N-CDs the nitrogen concentration is lower at the surface than in the bulk. In Figure S5, the C1s band, recorded in high-resolution mode, evidences three different contributions centered at 284.6 eV (related to C=C bonds, 60% of total area), at 285.8 eV (related to C=O and/or C=N bonds, 25% of total area) and at 288.0 eV (related to C–O and/or C–N bonds, 15% of total area) [24]. The O1s band is centered around 531.6 eV, in agreement with the presence of carbon-oxygen bonds. As far as nitrogen is concerned, the N1s band (Figure S6) can be well-fitted only by assuming the overlap of two different components, having approximately the same intensity, centered at 399.8 and at 401.1 eV of binding energy. The first component is in agreement with the presence of nitrogen involved in amine functional groups, the second one in amide compounds [39].
SAXS measurements showed the presence of clusters with dimensions in the order of hundreds of nanometers, from the upturn in intensity in the low Q region of the scattering curves of both samples (Figure S9). The surface fractal dimensions (Ds), extracted from the fitting procedures (described in SI), informs about the roughness of the clusters surface. The Ds values are 2.29 for the a-N-CDs sample and 2.14 for the bass-CDs, describing quite smooth surfaces. The low roughness of the clusters’ surface indicates that they consist of small primary particles, with low porosity and a smooth surface.
Furthermore, SAXS measurements showed that the bass-CDs sample is characterized by the presence of smaller aggregates with a mass fractal behavior, evidenced by the characteristic power law behavior in the middle Q region (from approx. 0.0045 to 0.045 Å−1) (More details in the Supplementary Materials). The best fit, with a specific fractal model, confirmed their mass fractal behavior, indicating the presence of aggregates with size of (127 ± 8) nm. The presence of these agglomerates was confirmed also by SLS measurement, which revealed the presence of clusters with an average diameter of (120 ± 30) nm (see Figure S10). The used model for SAXS measurements gives also the radius of the primary particles composing the aggregates, that is (4 ± 1) nm. For a-N-CDs, SLS turned out to be an unsuitable technique. In fact, they absorb the majority of the incident radiation and no intensity is able to reach the detector. AFM measurements highlight the spherical shape of both bass-CDs and a-N-CDs. The bass-CDs sample showed nanoparticles and clusters of different sizes. In Figure 2a, visible clusters of hundreds of nanometers (center and bottom of the image) and agglomerates with a diameter around 120 nm (top left of the image) can be seen. In Figure 2b,c, single smaller spherical nanoparticles with a diameter around 10 nm are shown. The nanoparticle diameters estimated by AFM are in accordance with the ones measured by SAXS and SLS. It appears that the a-N-CDs have a more homogeneous size distribution compared to the bass-CDs, with nanoparticles having a diameter of 13 nm (Figure 2d,e).
The optical properties of the CDs were investigated by Ultraviolet–Visible (UV–Vis) spectroscopy, Photoluminescence (PL) and time-resolved PL measurements.
UV–Vis absorption spectroscopy of aqueous solution (0.25 mg/mL) of bass-CDs exhibits a characteristic absorption peak around 250 nm, which is mainly derived from the π-π* transition of aromatic carbons. The other peak around 350 nm could be ascribable to the n-π* transition of double bonds containing groups such as C=O and C=N (see Figure S7) [40]. As seen in Figure 3, both bass-CDs and a-N-CDs have the same absorption peaks but the absorbances are far more intense in citric acid-derived nanoparticles.
The PL-PLE analysis of the bass-CDs revealed an excitation-dependent emission around 450 nm (Figure S8), with a decrease in the emission wavelength decreasing the excitation wavelength. This could probably highlight that the emission is from defect and not from well-defined electronic levels. For a-N-CDs, the high presence of one fluorophore gave a very stable and excitation-independent emission peak at 450 nm.
To fully explain the photocatalytic reactions, time-resolved Photoluminescence (PL) was applied to evaluate the PL lifetimes of the carbon nanoparticles (Figure 4). The average lifetime of the excited state (τ) of bass-CDs was 7.0 ns, while for a-N-CDs τ = 13.5 ns was observed. The τ of the dialyzed sample of bass-CDs was 6.5 ns, similar to the one of non-dialyzed bass-CDs. To fit the emission of bass-CDs, three constants were needed, while for a-N-CDs, only two were needed; the behaviors of the PL decays and the parameters are reported in Table S1. The more linear character of a-N-CDs was consonant with a molecular-like emission, explained by the presence in its structure of molecular fluorophores [24].
Quantum Yields (QYs, based on quinine sulphate) were also measured for the three types of CDs (a-N-CDs, bass-CDs and dialyzed bass-CDs). In Figure 5, the spectra collected in the integration sphere are reported. The excitation wavelength is 372 nm. The blue, red, green and yellow curves refer to the scattering from a blank reference (Sr) and the sample (Ss), the emission from the reference (Er) and the sample (Es), respectively. The quantum yield is calculated using the following equation: QY(η) = (Es − Er)/(Sr − Ss).
The QYs for a-N-CDs, bass-CDs and dialyzed bass-CDs were, respectively, 17.3%, 6.0% and 3.1%. The large QY observed for the a-N-CDs was attributed to the presence of molecular fluorophores, while the purified bass-CDs have a ~48% lower QY, probably due to the loss of fluorophores.
Another parameter that was taken into account was the mass absorption coefficient ε. From our previous work, ε was dependent on the presence of nitrogen [24]; however, in this study ε = 10.93 L·g−1·cm−1 for a-N-CDs and ε = 0.37 L·g−1·cm−1 for the bass-CDs. These experimental data highlighted that ε was independent from the N-doping of the CDs: Although the C/N ratio is almost the same (3.23 for a-N-CDs and 3.21 bass-CD), the mass absorption coefficient is very different.
For easier comparison, in Table 3 the average lifetime (τ) of the excited state, the QY, and ε for the CDs, together with the photocatalytic activities (initial rate and conversion), are summarized.
The observed trend indicates that higher QY of a-N-CDs (17.3%) with respect to the bass-CDs (6.0%) does not strictly correlate with the kinetics (4.9 Ms−1 for a-N-CDs and 7.5 Ms−1 for a-N-CDs). This apparent inconsistency was explained because QY, ε and τ are helpful in understanding PET but not strictly correlated with the catalytic activity that depends on multiple variables.

3.2. Photocatalysis

Starting from the assumption that the photocatalytic activity of the CDs (i.e., their photoelectron transfer (PET) ability) depends on their morphology, structure and optical properties, we decided to probe it by studying the photoreduction of methyl viologen MV2+ to its radical cation MV+. In this reaction, an electron is transferred from the photoexcited state of the CDs to the MV2+ that acts as acceptor molecule and is an established reactivity-test to prove the PET efficiency of CDs [19,20,41] (Figure 6). To understand the photoredox activity and correlate it with the structure of the bass-CDs, we measured the photoreduction rates of MV2+ (−0.45 V vs NHE) in aqueous solution in the presence of ethylenediaminetetraacetate as a sacrificial electron donor under light-emitting diode irradiation at 365 nm (the time resolved UV-Vis spectra are shown in Figure S11) and compared with the one obtained with the already known a-N-CDs [24]. To compare the photocatalytic activity of two different types of CDs, we decided to perform two different experiments: One using a concentration of nanoparticles normalized for absorption at 365 nm and another using the same concentration (mg of CDs/mL) of photocatalyst.
In the experiment with the normalized absorption of CDs, bass-CDs resulted to be far less luminescent and a higher concentration of CDs was needed to reach the same absorption as a-N-CDs (0.2 mg/mL of bass-CDs vs 0.005 mg/mL a-N-CDs to have an absorbance of 0.13 a.u.); however, as shown in Figure 7 and Table 3, bass-CDs exhibited a higher initial photoreduction rate (7.5 × 10−8 vs 4.9 × 10−8 Ms−1) and a higher MV2+ conversion (34.0 vs 21.8 µM). On the other hand, using the same concentration of photocatalyst, a-N-CDs resulted to be far more luminescent (2.9 vs 0.13 a.u. at 365 nm) and only slightly more reactive toward PET to MV2+. In fact, as highlighted in Figure 7 and Table 3, after 30 min, a-N-CDs gave a substrate conversion of 62.5% (37.5 µM) compared to the 56.6% of bass-CDs. This underlines the high PET ability of bass-CDs, despite their low absorbance at 365 nm and without the need of any external nitrogen doping agent.
A series of control reactions with a-N-CDs (tested in the absence of light, without CDs and without EDTA) were already reported in our previous work [24] and demonstrated that, in the absence of irradiation, EDTA or CDs, no MV2+ reduction was observed, implying that all three were indispensable. Two additional control experiments, with the bass-CDs and in the absence of light (pink data in Figure 7) and with bass-CDS and without EDTA (green datapoints in Figure 7), further confirmed these requirements for the photochemical reduction of MV2+.
Cyclic Voltammetry (CV) experiments were carried out on a-N-CDs in our previous work [42] to measure their redox activity and correlate the energy levels of the nanomaterials with the relative band gap. a-N-CDs showed a negative potential (E onset red = −1.94 vs Ag|AgCl), suggesting a good reducing capability. The energy gap of the nanomaterials resulted to be of 3 eV, thanks to the presence of molecular-like fluorophores that ensure a high PET efficiency, implying a great energy of the excited electron generated upon irradiation.

4. Conclusions

In this work we demonstrate the possibility to valorize fishery waste, in particular bass scales, using them as a carbon source for the production of luminescent carbon nanoparticles with a high ability in photoelectron transfer. This new class of CDs was characterized in-depth regarding their morphology, composition and surface properties, showing a considerable nitrogen content (3.21 C/N from elemental analysis) without the need of any external doping agent. Since nitrogen doping in CDs is known to enhance the photocatalytic activity of the nanoparticles, bass-CDs were then compared with CDs obtained from citric acid and diethylenetriamine (a-N-CDs) toward the single electron reduction of MV2+.
Bass-CDs resulted to have a lower lifetime of the excited state (7.0 ns vs 13.0 ns of a-N-CDs), mass absorption coefficient (0.37 L·g−1 cm−1 vs 10.93) and QY (6.0% vs 17.3%), but higher initial photoreduction rate (7.5 × 10−8 M·s−1 vs 4.9 × 10−8 M·s−1 for absorption normalized experiment). This experimental evidence contributes to highlight the fact that τ, ε and QY are important parameters to understand the photoelectron transfer activity of CDs, but they are not strictly correlated with the photocatalytic ability of the nanoparticles. However, a lower value of QY seems to favor the photocatalytic activity of CDs, presumably because the absorbed photons are not immediately re-emitted but can instead transfer their energy to perform the photoreduction.
The fish scale-derived CDs have similar morphology to that of the a-N-CDs, but less intense absorbance, lower QY, τ and ε. Despite this, bass-CDs resulted to function as a valuable photocatalyst and to have a higher photoelectron transfer ability toward methyl viologen.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at, Figure S1: 1H NMR of crude and purified bass-CDs in D2O, Figure S2:13C {1H} of crude and purified bass-CDs in D2O, Figure S3: 2D DOSY of purified bass-CDs in D2O, Figure S4: FT-IR spectrum of bass-CDs in KBr, Figure S5: C1s XPS spectrum of bass-CDs, Figure S6: N1s XPS spectrum of bass-CDs, Figure S7: UV–Vis spectrum of bass-CDs, Figure S8: PL-PLE spectrum of bass-CDs, Figure S9: Scattering intensity I(Q) vs Q for both CDs samples, together with the best curve fit obtained by using the model described in the text, Figure S10: SLS size distribution vs intensity in percent, Figure S11: Time resolved UV-Vis spectra of bass-CDs (0.2 mg/mL) with methyl viologen (MV2+, 60μM) in aqueous EDTA, Table S1: Biexponential fitting of lifetime data, Table S2: List of the parameters of the fit curves reported in Figure S9. * The values between brackets are the surface fractal dimensions D s .

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.P., C.C. and M.S.; data curation, C.C., E.C., A.V., S.Y., L.M., S.Z. and C.M.; investigation, C.C., S.Y. and C.M.; methodology, L.M. and M.C.; project administration, A.P.; supervision, A.P.; writing—review and editing, A.P., C.C. and M.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.


This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article or Supplementary Material.


Francesca Mazzolini is gratefully acknowledged for experimental assistance in the processing of the fish scales to make the carbon dots.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


  1. Al Khawli, F.; Pateiro, M.; Dominguez, R.; Lorenzo, J.M.; Gullòn, P.; Kousoulaki, K.; Ferrer, E.; Berrada, H.; Barda, F.J. Innovative Green Technologies of Intensification for Valorisation of Seafood and Their By-Products. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 689–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  2. Cai, J.; Hishamunda, N. World Aquaculture Performance Indicators (WAPI): A user friendly tool. FAO Aquac. Newsl. 2013, 51, 34–36. [Google Scholar]
  3. Maschmeyer, T.; Luque, R.; Selva, M. Upgrading of marine (fish and crustaceans) biowaste for high added-value molecules and bio(nano)-materials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49, 4527–4563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Xu, C.; Nasrollahzadeh, M.; Selva, M.; Issaabadi, Z.; Luque, R. Waste-to-wealth: Biowaste valorization into valuable bio(nano)materials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48, 4791–4822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kerton, F.M.; Liu, Y.; Omari, K.W.; Hawboldt, K. Green chemistry and the ocean-based biorefinery. Green. Chem. 2013, 15, 860–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  6. IFFO The Marine Ingredients Organisation. Available online: (accessed on 30 October 2020).
  7. Santos, V.P.; Marques, N.S.S.; Maia, P.C.S.V.; Barbosa de Lima, M.A.; de Oliveira Franco, L.; de Campos-Takaki, G.M. Seafood waste as attractive source of Chitin and Chitosan production and their applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4290–4306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jayathilakan, K.; Sultana, K.; Radhakrishna, K.; Bawa, A.S. Utilization of byproducts and waste materials from meat, poultry and fish processing industries: A review. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2012, 49, 278–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  9. Maqsood, S.; Benjakul, S.; Kamal-Eldin, A. Extraction, processing, and stabilization of health-promoting fish oils. Recent Pat. Food Nutr. Agric. 2012, 4, 141–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wu, G.; Feng, M.; Zhan, H. Generation of nitrogen-doped photoluminescent carbonaceous nanodots via the hydrothermal treatment of fish scales for the detection of hypochlorite. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 44636–44641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Baker, S.N.; Baker, G.A. Luminescent Carbon Nanodots: Emergent nanolights. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 6726–6744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Li, H.; Kang, Z.; Liu, Y.; Lee, S.T. Carbon Nanodots: Synthesis, properties and applications. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 24230–24253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chen, B.; Li, F.; Li, S.; Weng, W.; Guo, H.; Guo, T.; Zhang, X.; Chen, Y.; Huang, T.; Hong, X.; et al. Large scale synthesis of photoluminescent carbon nanodots and their application for bioimaging. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 1967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Cailotto, S.; Amadio, E.; Facchin, M.; Selva, M.; Pontoglio, E.; Rizzolio, F.; Riello, P.; Toffoli, G.; Benedetti, A.; Perosa, A. Carbon Dots from Sugars and Ascorbic Acid: Role of the Precursors on Morphology, Properties, Toxicity, and Drug Uptake. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2018, 9, 832–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Huang, S.-W.; Lin, Y.-F.; Li, Y.-X.; Hu, C.-C.; Chiu, T.-C. Synthesis of Fluorescent Carbon Dots as Selective and Sensitive Probes for Cupric Ions and Cell Imaging. Molecules 2019, 24, 1785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  16. Tuerhong, M.; Xu, Y.; Yin, X.-B. Review on Carbon Dots and Their Applications. Chin. J. Anal. Chem. 2017, 45, 139–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chandra, S.; Patra, P.; Pathan, S.H.; Roy, S.; Mitra, S.; Layek, A.; Bhar, R.; Pramanik, P.; Goswami, A. Luminescent S-doped carbon dots: An emergent architecture for multimodal applications. J. Mater. Chem. B 2013, 1, 2375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hutton, G.A.M.; Martindale, B.C.M.; Reisner, E. Carbon dots as photosensitisers for solar-driven catalysis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 6111–6123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  19. Martindale, B.C.M.; Hutton, G.A.M.; Caputo, C.A.; Reisner, E. Solar Hydrogen Production Using Carbon Quantum Dots and a Molecular Nickel Catalyst. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 6018–6025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Martindale, B.C.M.; Hutton, G.A.M.; Caputo, C.A.; Prantl, S.; Godin, R.; Durrant, J.R.; Reisner, E. Enhancing Light Absorption and Charge Transfer Efficiency in Carbon Dots through Graphitization and Core Nitrogen Doping. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 6459–6463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  21. Zhang, H.; Li, Y.; Liu, X.; Liu, P.; Wang, Y.; An, T. Determination of iodide via direct fluorescence quenching at Nitrogen-Doped carbon quantum dot fluorophores. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2014, 1, 87–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, C.; Wu, X.; Li, X.; Wang, W.; Wang, L.; Gu, M. Upconversion fluorescent carbon nanodots enriched with nitrogen for light harvesting. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 15522–15525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  23. Amadio, E.; Cailotto, S.; Campalani, C.; Branzi, L.; Raviola, C.; Ravelli, D.; Cattaruzza, E.; Trave, E.; Benedetti, A.; Selva, M.; et al. Precursor-Dependent Photocatalytic Activity of Carbon Dots. Molecules 2020, 25, 101–109. [Google Scholar]
  24. Cailotto, S.; Mazzaro, R.; Enrichi, F.; Vomiero, A.; Selva, M.; Cattaruzza, E.; Cristofori, D.; Amadio, E.; Perosa, A. Design of Carbon Dots for Metal-free Photoredox Catalysis. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 40560–40567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Meng, W.; Bai, X.; Wang, B.; Liu, Z.; Lu, S.; Yang, B. Biomass-derived carbon Dots and their applications. Energy Environ. Mater. 2019, 2, 172–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhao, S.; Lan, M.; Zhu, X.; Xue, H.; Ng, T.-W.; Meng, X.; Lee, C.-S.; Wang, P.; Zhang, W. Green Synthesis of Bifunctional Fluorescent Carbon Dots from Garlic for Cellular Imaging and Free Radicals Scavenging. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 17060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yang, W.; Shimanouchi, T.; Kimura, Y. Characterization of the Residue and Liquid Products Produced from Husks of Nuts from Carya cathayensis Sarg by Hydrothermal Carbonization. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2015, 3, 591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kasibabu, B.S.B.; D’souza, S.L.; Jha, S.; Kailasa, S.K. Imaging of Bacterial and Fungal CellsUsing Fluorescent Carbon Dots Prepared from carica Papaya Juice. J. Fluoresc. 2015, 25, 810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Liu, R.; Zhang, J.; Gao, M.; Li, Z.; Chen, J.; Wu, D.; Liu, P. A facile Microwave-hydrothermal approach towards highly photoluminescent carbon dots from goose feathers. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 4428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhang, J.; Yuan, Y.; Liang, G.; Yu, S.H. Scale-up Synthesis of Fragrant Nitrogen-doped Carbon Dots from Bee Pollens for Bioimaging and Catalysis. Adv. Sci. 2015, 2, 1500002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, Y.; Gao, Z.; Yang, X.; Chang, J.; Liu, Z.; Jiang, K. Fish-scale-derived carbon dots as efficient fluorescent nanoprobes for detection of ferric ions. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  32. Zhang, Y.; Gao, Z.; Zhang, W.; Wang, W.; Chang, J.; Kai, J. Fluorescent carbon dots as nanoprobe for determination of lidocaine hydrochloride. Sens. Actuators B 2018, 262, 928–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Athinarayanan, J.; Periasamy, V.S.; Alshatwi, A.A. Simultaneous fabrication of Carbon nanodots and hydroxyapatite nanoparticles from fish scale for biomedical applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2020, 117, 111313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Narayanan, T. Small-Angle Scattering. In Structure from Diffraction Methods; Bruce, D.W., O’Hare, D., Walton, R.I., Eds.; Wiley Online Library: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2014; pp. 259–324. [Google Scholar]
  35. Doucet, M.; Cho, J.H.; Alina, G.; Attala, Z.; Bakker, J.; Bouwman, W.; Butler, P.; Campbell, K.; Cooper-Benun, T.; Durniak, C.; et al. SasView Version 5.0.3 Zenodo (2020, July 4). Available online: (accessed on 15 February 2021).
  36. Cao, T.H.; Nguyen, T.T.O.; Nguyen, T.M.H.; Le, N.T.; Razumovskaya, R.G. Characteristics and physicochemical properties of gelatin extracted from scales of seabass (Lates calcarifer) and grey mullet (Mugil cephalus) in Vietnam. J. Aquat. Food Prod. Technol. 2017, 26, 1293–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Dinçer, M.T.; Agçay, O.Y.; Sargin, H.; Bayram, H. Functional properties of gelatin recovered from scales of farmed sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax). Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 2015, 39, 102–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chuaychan, S.; Benjakul, S.; Kishimura, H. Characteristics of acid- and pepsin-soluble collagens from scale of seabass (Lates calcarifer). LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 63, 71–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kehrer, M.; Duchoslav, J.; Hinterreiter, A.; Cobet, M.; Mehic, A.; Stehrer, T.; Stifter, D. XPS investigation on the reactivity of surface imine groupswith TFAA. PlasmaProcess Polym. 2019, 16, 1800160. [Google Scholar]
  40. Yang, Y.H.; Cui, J.H.; Zheng, M.T.; Hu, C.F.; Tan, S.Z.; Xiao, Y.; Yang, Q.; Liu, Y.L. One-step Synthesis of amino-functionalized fluorescent carbon nanoparticles by hydrothermal carbonization of chitosan. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 380–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Rigodanza, F.; Đorđevic, L.; Arcudi, F.; Prato, M. Customizing the Electrochemical Properties of Carbon Nanodots by Using Quinones in Bottom-up Synthesis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 5062–5067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Cailotto, S.; Negrato, M.; Daniele, S.; Luque, R.; Selva, M.; Amadio, E.; Perosa, A. Carbon dots as photocatalysts for organic synthesis: Metal-free methylene-oxygen-bond photocleavage. Green Chem. 2020, 22, 1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Synthetic pathway for the bass carbon dots (bass-CDs).
Figure 1. Synthetic pathway for the bass carbon dots (bass-CDs).
Nanomaterials 11 00524 g001
Figure 2. AFM images of bass-CDs (a–c) and a-N-CDs (d,e).
Figure 2. AFM images of bass-CDs (a–c) and a-N-CDs (d,e).
Nanomaterials 11 00524 g002
Figure 3. Comparison between UV–Vis spectra of bass-CDs (black line) and a-N-CDs (red-line).
Figure 3. Comparison between UV–Vis spectra of bass-CDs (black line) and a-N-CDs (red-line).
Nanomaterials 11 00524 g003
Figure 4. Time-resolved PL measurements of a-N-CDs (green), bass-CDs (black) and dialyzed bass-CDs (red).
Figure 4. Time-resolved PL measurements of a-N-CDs (green), bass-CDs (black) and dialyzed bass-CDs (red).
Nanomaterials 11 00524 g004
Figure 5. The PL spectra collected in the integration sphere.
Figure 5. The PL spectra collected in the integration sphere.
Nanomaterials 11 00524 g005
Figure 6. Catalytic scheme for the single electron photoreduction of methyl viologen with carbon dots (CDs).
Figure 6. Catalytic scheme for the single electron photoreduction of methyl viologen with carbon dots (CDs).
Nanomaterials 11 00524 g006
Figure 7. Reaction kinetics of the formation of methyl viologen radical (MV+) using bass-CDs (black datapoints) and a-N-CDs (red and blue datapoints). Blank tests in absence of light (pink datapoints) and of EDTA (green datapoints).
Figure 7. Reaction kinetics of the formation of methyl viologen radical (MV+) using bass-CDs (black datapoints) and a-N-CDs (red and blue datapoints). Blank tests in absence of light (pink datapoints) and of EDTA (green datapoints).
Nanomaterials 11 00524 g007
Table 1. Elemental percentage composition of bass scales, bass-CDs and amorphous nitrogen-doped carbon dots (a-N-CDs).
Table 1. Elemental percentage composition of bass scales, bass-CDs and amorphous nitrogen-doped carbon dots (a-N-CDs).
Bass scales9.0025.004.500.202.78
Table 2. Comparison of morphology, composition and surface properties of bass-CDs and a-N-CDs.
Table 2. Comparison of morphology, composition and surface properties of bass-CDs and a-N-CDs.
Elemental AnalysisFT-IRXPS
Bass-CDsC/N = 3.21-OH
-NH (amines/amides)
-Aromatic C=C
-C–O or C–N
-C=O or C=N
C/O/N = 66/26/8
a-N-CDsC/N = 3.23-OH
-NH (amines/amides)
-Aromatic C=C
-C–O or C–N
-C=O or C=N
C/O/N = 70/20/10
Table 3. Initial photoreduction rate (v0), Quantum Yield (QY), mass absorption coefficient (ε), average lifetime (τ), and MV2+ conversion of the synthesized CDs.
Table 3. Initial photoreduction rate (v0), Quantum Yield (QY), mass absorption coefficient (ε), average lifetime (τ), and MV2+ conversion of the synthesized CDs.
CDs Concentration (mg/mL)Absorbance at 365 nmv0·10−8 (M·s−1)QY (%)ε (L·g−1 ·cm−1)τ (ns)MV2+ Conversion (%)
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Campalani, C.; Cattaruzza, E.; Zorzi, S.; Vomiero, A.; You, S.; Matthews, L.; Capron, M.; Mondelli, C.; Selva, M.; Perosa, A. Biobased Carbon Dots: From Fish Scales to Photocatalysis. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 524.

AMA Style

Campalani C, Cattaruzza E, Zorzi S, Vomiero A, You S, Matthews L, Capron M, Mondelli C, Selva M, Perosa A. Biobased Carbon Dots: From Fish Scales to Photocatalysis. Nanomaterials. 2021; 11(2):524.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Campalani, Carlotta, Elti Cattaruzza, Sandro Zorzi, Alberto Vomiero, Shujie You, Lauren Matthews, Marie Capron, Claudia Mondelli, Maurizio Selva, and Alvise Perosa. 2021. "Biobased Carbon Dots: From Fish Scales to Photocatalysis" Nanomaterials 11, no. 2: 524.

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop