Next Article in Journal
Uptake and Accumulation of Nano/Microplastics in Plants: A Critical Review
Previous Article in Journal
The Ripple Effect of Graphite Nanofilm on Stretchable Polydimethylsiloxane for Optical Sensing
Previous Article in Special Issue
Carbon Dioxide-Derived Biodegradable and Cationic Polycarbonates as a New siRNA Carrier for Gene Therapy in Pancreatic Cancer
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 11
Issue 11
10.3390/nano11112936
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Polymer-Coated Nanoparticles for Therapeutic and Diagnostic Non-10B Enriched Polymer-Coated Boron Carbon Oxynitride (BCNO) Nanoparticles as Potent BNCT Drug

by
Chen-Wei Chiang
1,
Yun-Chen Chien
1,
Wen-Jui Yu
2,
Chia-Yu Ho
1,
Chih-Yi Wang
1,
Tzu-Wei Wang
1,
Chi-Shiun Chiang
2 and
Pei-Yuin Keng
1,*
1
Department of Material Science and Engineering, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu City 300, Taiwan
2
Department of Biomedical Engineering and Environmental Science, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu City 300, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2021, 11(11), 2936; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11112936
Submission received: 18 September 2021 / Revised: 27 October 2021 / Accepted: 28 October 2021 / Published: 2 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Polymer Coated Nanoparticles for Therapeutic and Diagnostic Applications)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) is a powerful and selective anti-cancer therapy utilizing 10B-enriched boron drugs. However, clinical advancement of BCNT is hampered by the insufficient loading of B-10 drugs throughout the solid tumor. Furthermore, the preparation of boron drugs for BNCT relies on the use of the costly B-10 enriched precursor. To overcome these challenges, polymer-coated boron carbon oxynitride (BCNO) nanoparticles, with ~30% of boron, were developed with enhanced biocompatibility, cell uptake, and tumoricidal effect via BNCT. Using the ALTS1C1 cancer cell line, the IC50 of the PEG@BCNO, bare, PEI@BCNO were determined to be 0.3 mg/mL, 0.1 mg/mL, and 0.05 mg/mL, respectively. As a proof-of-concept, the engineered non-10B enriched polymer-coated BCNO exhibited excellent anti-tumor effect via BNCT due to their high boron content per nanoparticle and due to the enhanced cellular internalization and retention compared to small molecular 10B-BPA drug. The astrocytoma ALTS1C1 cells treated with bare, polyethyleneimine-, and polyethylene glycol-coated BCNO exhibited an acute cell death of 24, 37, and 43%, respectively, upon 30 min of neutron irradiation compared to the negligible cell death in PBS-treated and non-irradiated cells. The radical approach proposed in this study addresses the expensive and complex issues of B-10 isotope enrichment process; thus, enabling the preparation of boron drugs at a significantly lower cost, which will facilitate the development of boron drugs for BNCT.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

More than 50% of cancer patients received radiation therapy during their course of treatment [1]. The combination of chemotherapy and radiation therapy remains the first line of treatment in the clinical management of several solid tumors. However, this treatment paradigm can lead to significant toxicity and side effects in patients because both treatments (i.e., chemotherapy and radiation therapy) destroy the neighboring healthy tissues surrounding the cancer cells or healthy tissues that are in the lane of the radiation beam. Boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) is an alternative radiotherapy that enables the selective destruction of individual cancer cells when a boron drug is administered. The fundamental principle of BNCT is based on the nuclear reaction between B-10 isotope and a low-energy epithermal neutron to induce lethal damage at the targeted tumor cells. This nuclear reaction produces high-linear energy transfer (LET) particles that dissipates their energy within a very short distance (5–9 µm), which is comparable to the size of a single cell [2,3]. Consequently, BNCT enables the selective destruction of tumor cells, while sparring the adjacent healthy tissues. To date, only two boron drugs (sodium mercaptoundecahydro-closo-dodecaborate (BSH) and borophenylalanine (BPA)) have been approved by FDA for BNCT treatment in patients owing to their low toxicity. BPA/BSH-BNCT have been used for the clinical treatment of various cancers such as hepatic cancer [4], melanoma cancer [5], gastric cancer [6], gliomas [3,7], head, and neck cancer [8,9,10,11,12,13]. However, preclinical and clinical studies on these drugs are still non-conclusive. One of the major challenges of BCNT is the development of a highly-selective boron carrier that can deliver a high concentration of 10B into cancer cells, and concomitantly, a high tumor to normal tissue uptake ratio. In addition, cancer recurrence after BNCT treatment has significantly limited the clinical application of BNCT, and this could be attributed to the low boron content of small-molecule drugs, which are rapidly eliminated via blood circulation, and the lack of targeting ability of the boron drugs [14]. To overcome the disadvantages of small-molecule boron drugs, various approaches, such as the use of carborane and metallocarborane derivatives [15,16,17,18], macromolecules [19,20,21,22,23], dendrimers [24,25,26,27,28], liposomes [29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36], dextran conjugates [37,38,39], and polymer micelles [40,41] were employed to deliver a high loading of 10B to the tumor site with high specificity. These approaches utilize the multifunctionality of nanomedicine and the nanometer size of these nanostructures for accumulating in tumor site via the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect. Among these third-generation boron drugs, boron-based nanostructures have emerged as a potential boron nanodrug for delivering a high loading of B-10 atom tumor site. The first demonstration of using boron nanoparticle instead of conventional soluble boron cluster as boron drug for BNCT was pioneered by Hokland in 2007. This early study showed that boron nanoparticle is non-toxic and can deliver a high loading of B-10 (~2000 ppm of boron) into the tumor cell [42]. This initial study showed an increase in survival rates and decreased in tumor growth after BNCT treatment. Hwang et al., later developed the most complex nanomedicine theranostic boron nanoparticle with silica shell, which enabled treatment of brain cancer via BNCT and image-guided delivery via optical and MRI [43]. However, further development of this [10B]-boron nanoparticles for BNCT is limited due to the low tumor to blood ratio. Various boron nitride nanomaterial has also been as boron drug delivery agent, due to the high loading of boron and simultaneously delivery anti-cancer drug selectively into the tumor cell [44,45]. However, surface functionalization is needed for the boron nitride nanomaterial due to the poor suspension in the biological solution [46,47,48]. Boron nitride nanotube (BNNT) functionalized with a biocompatible polymers showed three-folds greater in 10B accumulation compared to BSH in B16 melanoma cell [49,50]. Recent studies have also revealed that the cytotoxicity of boron-based nanomaterials increases with a decrease in the particle size, suggesting that the appropriate surface protection of boron-containing nanomaterial is essential for their development as potential nanotherapeutics [51]. Particularly, current approaches rely on the use of 10B-enriched boron precursor to ensure the sufficient loading of B-10 atoms into the tumor cells for an effective BNCT. However, the high time and cost consumption of 10B-enrichment process have limited further clinical application of BNCT. We hypothesized that the utilization of the natural abundances of 10B in boron-based nanomaterials and an appropriate surface functionalization is sufficient for achieving a potent anti-tumor effect via BNCT.
Herein, we demonstrate the synthesis and functionalization of non-10B enriched polymer-coated quasi-spherical boron carbon oxynitride (BCNO) nanoparticles as an effective boron drug for BNCT (Scheme 1). BCNO is a non-toxic, non-rare earth and earth-friendly phosphor with application in light emitting diodes (LEDs) [52,53,54,55,56], highly sensitive fingerprint readers [57,58], toxic metal sensors [57,59,60], and in high contrast cellular imaging [61,62]. In contrast to previously reported boron nanomaterials, BCNO possesses an inherent photoluminescence (PL) property without the need of an additional labelling chemistry for imaging purposes. For biomedical application, surface functionalization of nanomaterials is one of the utmost important criteria towards a successful treatment or imaging outcome. However, to date, only a few studies in functionalizing the surface of BCNO nanoparticles have been demonstrated [63,64]. Herein, we have successfully modulated the cytotoxicity, optical properties, cellular uptake and tumoricidal effect of the polymer-coated BCNO nanoparticles as a novel theranostic agent for BNCT. In contrast to previously reported boron nanomaterials, BCNO possesses an inherent photoluminescence (PL) property without the need of an additional labelling chemistry for imaging purposes. To achieve a successful BNCT, the deposition of a high concentration of 10B (20 µg/g of 10B per gram of tumor cells) within the tumor cell is required to induce a cytocidal effect in the tumor tissues. Conventionally, to ensure the sufficient loading of 10B within a tumor cell, 10B enriched precursor is utilized during the preparation of boron drug for BNCT. However, 10B enrichment process is a highly time-consuming and cost intensive separation process; thus, significantly limiting the development of boron drugs and the clinical application of BNCT. Recent work on polyboronic acid (PBA) nanoparticles prepared using non-enriched isotopes demonstrated promising results [65]. However, the PBA nanoparticles composed of a limited number of boron. As a result, the BNCT treatment efficacy using PBA was only comparable to 10B-BPA. In this study, we engineered non-10B enriched boron-based nanodrugs with higher tumoricidal effect than the state-of-the-art 10B-BPA treatment. Our results showed that through polymer functionalization, the cytotoxicity, cell uptake, tumoricidal effect and optical properties can be modulated to achieve a highly efficient and safe BNCT.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals and Instrument

Boric acid 99.99% (H3BO3) and hexamethylenetetramine ≥99% (C6H12N4) were purchased from Alfa Aesar (Lancashire, United Kingdom) as used without further purification. Guanidine hydrochloride 99.5% (CH5N3·HCl) was purchased from Arcos Organics. Polyethylene glycol (MW 20,000 g/mol) was purchased from Alfa Aesar without further purification. Polyethyleneimine (MW 1800 g/mol) was purchased from Alfa Aesar without further purification. Congo red was purchased from Alfa Aesar. Polystyrene maleic anhydride PSMA (MW 1900 g/mol) was purchased from Aldrich. Dimethylformamide (DMF) was purchased from Honeywell without further purification. The morphology of BCNO samples was analyzed via transmission electron microscope (JEOL, JEM-ARM200FTH, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Photoluminescence emission spectra were obtained on the photoluminescence spectrometer (PerkinElmer, LS55), and optical absorption spectra were determined by the UV-Vis spectrometer (HITACHI, U-3900). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy was analyzed via high resolution X-ray photoelectron spectrometer (ULVAC-PHI, PHI Quantera II). Carbon correction was performed by using adventitious carbon at 284.6 eV. Infrared spectroscopy spectra were recorded by Fourier-transform infrared spectrometer (Bruker, Vertex 80v) using Attenuated Total Reflectance (ATR). XRD diffractions were obtained using the Bruker D2 spectrometer. Boron concentrations were measured via inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometer (ICP-OES) (Agilent 725). The ICP-OES boron content measurement of quasi-spherical BCNO nanoparticle was prepared by dissolving BCNO sample in 10 microliters of hydrofluoric acid (HF) and 1 mL of nitric acid (HNO3) and heated at 70 °C for 1 h. The 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl) (MTS) reagent was purchased from Promega Cooperation and used as received.

2.2. Synthesis of BCNO Nanoparticle

BCNO nanoparticles were synthesized via a facile low-temperature sintering process. Boric acid (6 g, 0.1 mol), guanidine hydrochloride (3.09 g, 0.032 mol), and hexamethylenetetramine (0.46 g, 0.0032 mol) were dissolved in 100 mL of DI water and heated at 90 °C. Upon subsequent evaporation, a glutinous mixture was dried in an oven overnight to obtain a completely dried solid. The white solid was grounded into fine powder using a mortar and pestle and subjected to calcination in a tube furnace at 800 °C for 12 h under ambient atmosphere. After cooling to room temperature, a ‘yellowish’ solid was recovered (0.5 g). The as-prepared BCNO was purified by centrifugation with water and ethanol (the ratio of solvent and product was 10 mL:100 mg) at 6000 rpm for 10 min. After centrifugation, the product was redissolved in distilled water, diluted with ethanol (1:10 v/v), finally the BCNO solution was deposited onto carbon-coated copper grid for TEM analysis. For the XPS specimens, the purified BCNO sample was drop cast onto the silicon wafer.

2.3. Functionalization of the BCNO Nanoparticle with PEI and PEG Ligands

Functionalization of the BCNO nanoparticles was performed by dissolving the polymer ligands (PEG or PEI) into the BCNO nanoparticle solution in water with a mass ratio of 1:3. The mixture was then stirred at 25 °C for 3 days. The solution was then centrifuged at 6000 rpm for 10 min and repeated three times to obtain the isolated polymer-coated BCNO solid. Then the solid was re-dispersed in DI water at known concentration for further characterization.

2.4. Functionalization of the BCNO Nanoparticle with PSMA-CR

Functionalization of BCNO with PSMA-Congo red dye was performed in two steps. First, Congo red was substituted onto the anhydride moieties of PSMA via a base-catalyzed ring-opening substitution reaction [66]. The PSMA and Congo red dye with a mole ratio of 1:1 was dissolved in 20 mL of ethanol. Then, 5 mL of DMF were added into the solution as catalysts. The solution mixture was stirred for 24 h at room temperature. The mixture was concentrated by rotatory evaporator and precipitated in cold ether. Then the red color solid was dried in an oven at 80 °C for 12 h and stored at ambient conditions. The PSMA-CR was then functionalized onto the surface of BCNO nanoparticle via a ligand exchange reaction [67]. Briefly, the PSMA-CR (1 g) was first dissolved in ethanol (100 mL) and then added into a solution of 300 mg of BCNO nanoparticle in ethanol (100 mL) solution. The mixture was stirred at 50 °C for 3 days. The red solution was purified via centrifugation at 6000 rpm for 10 min and repeated three times to obtain the purified PSMA-CR coated BCNO nanoparticles as a red solid paste. The isolated solid (0.5 g) was re-dispersed in DI water at a known concentration for further characterization.

2.5. Synthesis of L-(4-10Borophenyl)alanine Fructose Complex (BPA-F)

BPA-F complex was prepared in a 1:1.1 weight percent ratio according to literature procedure [43]. In a typical experiment, 60 mg of 10BPA (98% 10B-enriched; Hammercap Medical AB, Stockholm) was dissolved in 10 mL of distilled water. To this turbid solution, 10 M NaOH solution was added dropwise to obtain a clear solution. Then, the addition of NaOH was continued until the pH reached ~10.5. After continuous stirring for 20 min, 66 mg of fructose was added and stirred for another 10 min. Then, the pH was adjusted to 8.0 with 12 M HCl, followed by the dropwise addition of 1 M HCl to obtain a solution with a pH of 7.4. Then, the BPA-F complex solution was filtered through a 1 µm and 0.45 µm filters and then stored at 4 °C overnight. After 24 h, the pH of the solution was re-measured at room temperature. Then, the solution was filtered again with 0.22 µm filter and finally stored at 2–8 °C.

2.6. Cell Viability Assay

The (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay was performed to evaluate the cytotoxic effect of BCNO and polymer-coated BCNO on ALTS1C1 cells. In a typical experiment, 1 × 107 ALTS1C1 cells/mL were cultured and incubated for 24 h. After 24 h, the cells were removed from the culture plate by trypsinization. Then 5000 ALTS1C1 cells were added into a 96 well-plate along with 100 microliters of Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM). Then different concentrations of BCNO and polymer functionalized BCNO were added into each well and allowed to incubate with ALTS1C1 cells with different concentrations of BCNO solutions for 72 h. After 72 h of incubation, 10 microliters of MTT reagent (0.5 mg/mL) was added to each well and incubated for another 4 h at 37 °C. After 4 h of incubation with MTT reagent, the violet-colored cell pellet was dissolved in 1 mL of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). The UV absorbances of the 96-well plate were recorded using an enzyme linked-immunosorbent assay (ELISA) plate reader at 570 nm. The absorbance values were then converted into cellular viabilities based on the calibration curve for different cell plating densities without any treatment of BCNO. Cell viability assay at 4 h was performed similarly by incubating the ALTS1C1 cells in 25 µg/mL concentration of bare BCNO, PEG@BCNO, PEI@BCNO and BPA-F complex for 4 h. The cell viability assays were performed similarly for the other boron drugs described in this study.

2.7. In Vitro Cell Uptake

In vitro cell uptake of BCNO and polymer-coated BCNO were performed by following a literature procedure [43]. Briefly, ALTS1C1 cells (2 × 104 cells/mL) were cultured in a 6-well plate by placing a coverslip inside each well. After 24 h of incubation, the cells were attached to the surface of the plate. Then 0.05 mg/mL of BCNO and polymer-coated BCNO solution were added into each well and incubated for 4 h. The cells were then washed with PBS buffer followed by trypsinization and then resuspended in PBS and analyzed using flow cytometry under the FITC channel. The concentration of boron atom taken up by ALTS1C1 cells was determined via ICP-MS by the following procedure. Briefly, ALTS1C1 cells (2 × 104 cells/mL) were cultured in a 6-well plate by placing a coverslip inside each well. After 24 h of incubation, the cells were attached to the surface of the plate. Then 0.05 mg/mL of BCNO and polymer-coated BCNO were added into each well and incubated for 4 h. The cells were then washed with PBS followed by trypsinization and then resuspended in PBS. Then the PBS suspension was centrifuged at 1500 rpm for 5 min, and the solid cell matrix was collected. The solid cell matrix was then dissolved in 10 microliters of hydrofluoric acid (HF) and 1 mL of nitric acid (HNO3) for ICP-MS boron measurement. Intracellular uptake of the bare BCNO and polymer-coated BCNO were imaged using confocal microscopy. First, the ALTS1C1 cells were cultured in a 6-well plate by placing a coverslip inside each well. After 24 h of incubation, the cells were attached to the surface of the plate inside each well. Then 0.05 mg/mL of BCNO containing solution were added to each well and incubated for 4 h at 37 °C. The cells were then washed with PBS three times, then the cells were stained with Fast dil and examined using confocal microscopy under the FITC channel to image the cellular uptake of the green fluorescence BCNO nanoparticles uptake into the ALTS1C1 cells. The in vitro intracellular boron uptake experiments were performed similarly using other boron drugs described in this study.

2.8. Thermal Neutron Irradiation Experiments

The thermal neutron irradiation experiments were performed by following a literature procedure [38]. Briefly 200 ul of DMEM medium solution containing 2 × 104 of ALTS1C1 cells was loaded in the central 28-well of a 96-well plate. The plate was placed in an incubator at 37 °C to incubate for 24 h to allow the ALTS1C1 cells to stick on the bottom of the 96-well plate. After 24 h, the original DMEM medium solution were removed and 200 uL of DMEM medium solution containing 25 µg/mL of BCNO solution was added into each well. The plate was placed in the incubator for 4 h to allow for cellular uptake. After 4 h of incubation, the free BCNO nanoparticles in the solution were removed by washing the cells twice using PBS buffer solution. The plate was then irradiated by slow thermal neutron beam at the Tsing Hua Open Pool Reactor (THOR) for 15, and 30 min. After neutron irradiation, the plates were further incubated at 37 °C for 6 h, and then cell viability were determined and the cell viabilities were determined by MTS assay. MTS reagent (20 µL) of was added to each well and incubated for another 1.5 h at 37 °C. After 1.5 h of incubation with MTS reagent, the UV absorbances of the 96-well plate were recorded using an enzyme linked-immunosorbent assay (ELISA) plate reader at 490 nm. The cell viabilities of ALTS1C1 cells incubated with BCNO nanoparticles and the BPA-F complex after neutron irradiation were obtained by normalizing to the control group without BCNO nanoparticle and without neutron irradiation. All experiments were repeated five times and the average cell survival data are calculated. Thermal neutron irradiation experiments were performed similarly for the other boron drugs described in this study.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Synthesis and Characterization of Polymer-Coated BCNO

TEM images in Figure 1 revealed the as prepared BCNO nanoparticles is irregular in shapes with an average lateral diameter of 6.1   ±   0.73 nm) and possessed a turbostractic boron nitride diffraction patterns. (Figure 1a and Figure S1—XRD) The as prepared bare BCNO quasi-spherical nanoparticles and the PEG@BCNO nanoparticles remained dispersed in aqueous solution and randomly assembled onto the TEM Cu grid as shown in Figure 1. Upon ligand exchange, the size of the BCNO nanoparticles is slightly reduced to an average diameter of 5.1 ± 0.67 nm (Figure 1b) due to the effective surface passivation of the polymer ligands in stabilizing individual BCNO nanoparticles from coalescensing with neighboring BCNO as shown in Figure 1a. As a result, the aqueous dispersibility of the the polymer-coated BCNO nanoparticles is qualitatively more stable and the colloidal solution of the polymer-coated BCNO also remained stable for a prolonged period of time compared to the bare nanoparticles.
The photoluminescence (PL) spectra of the quasi-spherical BCNO nanoparticles with different polymer coating is presented in Figure 2. The PL spectra of the bare BCNO produced a broad emission with three bumps at 412 nm, 445 nm and 489 nm, which is consistent with literature reports [68,69]. Upon functionalization with PEG ligands, the photoluminescence spectra of PEG@BCNO remained the same compared to the PL spectra of bare BCNO nanoparticles. However, PEI@BCNO showed a dramatic 40 nm blueshift. Such as large PL spectra blue shift of PEI@BCNO can be explained by the high electronegativity of nitrogen acting as the electron donor ligand in inducing a higher energy state within the HOMO-LUMO energy gap of BCNO, as shown in the carbon-dot system [70,71]. As for PEG@BCNO, the oxygen atom on the polymer backbone served as both the electron donor and electron acceptor [71,72]. Such anomalies could explain for the lack of emission spectra shift of PEG@BCNO compared to the bare BCNO.
The FTIR spectra of bare BCNO nanoparticles and the polymer-coated BCNO is presented in Figure 3. The bare BCNO showed B-N in-plane stretching at 1400 cm−1, B-N out of plane stretching at around 900 cm−1, N–O stretching at around 1500 cm−1, a broad stretching of O–H group around 3200 cm−1, and a B–O stretching around 1200 cm−1. Such bonding characteristics confirmed the successful synthesis of BCNO [73,74]. Upon functionalization with PEI, there is a reduction in the B–O stretching, while the amine stretching intensity at around 1600 cm−1 and 3400 cm−1 increases. This result indicates that the B–O bonding was substituted with B-N bonding from the reaction between the amine group from PEI with the electrophilic boron on the surface of BCNO [75,76]. Upon functionalization with PEG, the C–O–C stretching at around 1200 cm−1 and C–O stretching at around 1100 cm−1 emerged, which corresponded to the ether functional group in PEG. The broad O–H stretching band at around 3400 cm−1 also significantly increases, which indicates that PEG was successfully functionalized onto the surface of the BCNO quasi-spherical nanoparticle [77]. Zeta potential measurements of the bare BCNO, PEG@BCNO, and PEI@BCNO is presented in Figure 3c. Both the bare BCNO and PEG@BCNO possessed negative surface charges of −29 mV and −27 mV, respectively. In contrast, PEI@BCNO possessed positive surface charge of 29 mV, due to the protonation of amine groups on the PEI (pKa = 8.2) at physiological pH. The change in the surface potential of PEI@BCNO implies the successful functionalization of PEI on BCNO.
To further investigate the blue shift phenomena observed in PEI@BCNO, XPS analysis was conducted in order to elucidate the evolution of chemical bonding before and after functionalization with the nitrogen-containing ligand. XPS analysis of the bare quasi-spherical nanoparticle BCNO and PEI@BCNO are presented in Figure 4 and Table 1. The surface elemental composition of boron in PEI@BCNO was significantly reduced with concurrent increased in carbon content compared to the bare BCNO (Table 1). The high resolution C1s spectrum of the PEI@BCNO is dominated by C–C and C–N bonding at 283.4 and 284.5 eV, respectively. (Figure 4a,b) Thirdly, the B-N-O peak in the N1s spectrum of the bare BCNO was replaced by the B–N–C bonding at 396.8 eV upon functionalization with the PEI ligand (Figure 4b,d). Both the XPS and FTIR results further confirmed the successful functionalization of PEI polymer onto the surface of BCNO through a substitution reaction between the amino group of PEI and the B–O moieties on BCNO surface [76,78,79].
As a proof-of-concept, we demonstrated the functionalization of Congo red dye onto the surface of the quasi-spherical BCNO nanoparticles via a two-steps process. First, the amino group of the Congo red dye is substituted onto the electropositive anhydride moieties of the reactive PSMA copolymer. Subsequently, the Congo red substituted PSMA copolymer, abbreviated as PSMACR, is used to functionalize onto the surface of BCNO nanoparticles via a standard ligand exchange methodology [80]. In principle, this method can be extended to install other functionalities onto BCNO nanoparticles to impart desirable properties tailored for a specific application. Congo red is an organic red dye that is commonly used as a pH and chemical sensor [67,81,82], cell staining agent in biology, and as nano-theranostic agent [67,83,84,85,86]. It is also known that Congo red readily forms complex with amyloid fibril resulting in a phenomenon known as “aggregation-induced emission” (AIE). AIE refers to the enhancement in photoluminescence of Congo red upon self-aggregation, which has been utilized as biomarker for various amyloid-fibril related diseases, including Alzheimer’s disease [85,87]. The success of functionalization Congo red onto the surface of BCNO was further investigated using UV-vis and photoluminescence spectroscopy. Compared to the bare BCNO, the PSMACR@BCNO also showed a blue-shifted PL spectrum due to the electron donating effect of the amine group of CR.(Figure 5a) Furthermore, the emission band at 600 nm of PSMACR@BCNO was significantly enhanced compared to free Congo-red dye due to the AIE phenomenon. (Figure 5b red trace) The AIE behavior observed in PSMACR@BCNO could be explained by two folds. First, the confinement of PSMACR polymer ligand onto the surface of BCNO increases the local concentration of the CR dye. The increased in local centration of CR dye on the surface of the BCNO nanoparticles leads to the self-aggregation of CR red through their hydrophobic interactions, giving rise to the AIE phenomena. Furthermore, UV-Vis spectrum of the purified PSMACR@BCNO showed signature absorbance bands from both BCNO and Congo red in water with maxima at 240, 335, and 493 nm.(Figure 5c) The 240 nm absorbance could be assigned to the electronic transition from the valence band to the nitrogen vacancy level in BCNO and from the π–π* transition of the aromatic group in CR. The 335 nm and 493 nm absorbance bands could be attributed to the π–π* transition of the –NH and the π–π* transition of the azo group in CR, respectively [88,89]. In addition to the AIE behavior of CR, CR also exhibits pH dependence optical behavior. When the pH of the solution is above the pKa of the Congo-red dye (pKa ~ 5.5), the disulfonate dianion of Congo red gives rise to the absorbance band at 335 and 493 nm. At a lower pH value, the nitrogen and azo bond are protonated resulting in the emergence of a new absorbance band at 653 nm. Both the UV-vis absorbance and photoluminescence spectra confirmed that PSMACR@BCNO retained their photophysical properties of Congo red upon functionalization onto BCNO nanoparticles. This proof-of-concept demonstration enables BCNO to be functionalized with various chemical moieties for a wide range of applications, including as biomarker, nanotheranostic agent, hybrid organic-semiconductor devices, and pH chemical sensors [67,82,86,90].

3.2. Cytotoxicity Study of the BCNO, PEI@BCNO, and PEG@BCNO

The boron drug must have low cytotoxicity and high biocompatibility (i.e., dispersion in aqueous media) to be developed as a safe and effective BNCT drug. The as-prepared BCNO was readily dissolved in water, and it exhibited a concentration-dependent cytotoxicity behavior in the astrocytoma ALTS1C1 cells [43,91]. Based on previous work on the preparation of 10B-enriched boron nanoparticles for treating murine brain tumors via BNCT, we used the ALTS1C1 cells as a model study for a proof-of-concept demonstration [43]. Although it is well known that nanoparticle drugs cannot infiltrate the blood–brain barrier (BBB) to treat brain-related diseases, researchers have used various strategies to temporarily disrupt the BBB to allow nanotherapeutics to be delivered to the brain [92,93]. Moreover, research has demonstrated that the ALTSIC1 murine brain tumor model is highly infiltrative, making it a suitable candidate for future in vivo studies [91]. After 72 h of incubation, the half-maximal inhibitor concentrations (IC50) of the bare BCNO, PEG@BCNO, and PEI@BNCO were determined to be 0.1 mg/mL, 0.3 mg/mL, and 0.05 mg/mL, respectively.(Figure 6a–c) As anticipated, the bare BCNO nanoparticle exhibited higher cytotoxicity than PEG@BCNO because of the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) on the surface of the BCNO nanoparticles, which resulted in oxidative stress of the cells [51,94,95]. Conversely, the positively charged PEI@BCNO exhibited the highest cytotoxicity among the three BCNO samples investigated in this study, because of the cationic PEI ligand’s ability to induce apoptosis and cell necrosis in the targeted ALTS1C1 cell [96,97]. One of the greatest limitations of small molecule drugs, such as BPA, is the requirement for continuous BPA infusion in the blood to maintain BPA accumulation in tumor cells. Therefore, the concentration of 10B in the blood is also high, posing significant health risks to the patient during BNCT. According to the literature, nanodrugs are actively internalized through the formation of multiple interactions with the cell membrane, resulting in nanoparticle endocytosis and remaining trapped within the cell [65,98]. More in-depth in vivo biodistribution studies will be conducted to confirm the advantages of boron-based nanodrugs for BNCT over small molecule BPA. Cell internalization can be enhanced through appropriate surface functionalization with specific ligands that target the overexpressed receptors on cell membranes or with positively charged polymer ligands that can interact favorably with negatively charged glycocalyx. Based on these findings, the positively charged PEI@BCNO did have the highest cell internalization, followed by PEG@BCNO, while the bare BCNO had the lowest cell internalization, as confirmed via flow cytometry analysis (Figure 6d). Effective cell internalization and accumulation are essential for achieving effective BNCT using non-10B-enriched precursors.
Compared to small molecule boron drug, which contained one boron atom per molecule, the as prepared BCNO quasi-spherical nanoparticles contained about 30% of boron atom per nanoparticles based on ICP-OES analysis. We hypothesized that a rationally engineered BCNO nanoparticles could deliver sufficient 10B for effective BNCT treatment by taking advantage of the natural abundances of 10B isotopes (~80% and ~20% of 11B and 10B) and the improved cell internalization characteristic. To test this question, the intracellular uptake of the bare BCNO, PEG@BCNO and PEI@BCNO into ALTS1C1 cells was measured via ICP-MS to be negligible, ~16 µg and 48 µg of boron/g of cell, respectively (Figure 7). This proof-of-concept demonstration showed that the cytotoxicity and cell internalization capability of BCNO can be simply modulated by functionalizing their surfaces with appropriate polymers, opening up opportunities of advancing BNCT research in using non-10B enriched precursor.
Taking advantage of their inherent photoluminescence properties of BCNO nanoparticles, along with their high boron content, the distribution of polymer-coated quasi-spherical BCNO nanoparticle could be detected using a fluorescence microscope [61,62]. The ALTS1C1 cells were stained with Fast-dil dye, which appeared red, while BCNO nanoparticles showed green fluorescence upon photoexcitation under the FITC channel. Intracellular colocalization of BCNO nanoparticles and the ALTS1C1 cells appeared as yellow fluorescence in the merged image, as shown in Figure 8. Qualitatively, the cell uptake of the PEI@BCNO is much higher compared to the PEG@BCNO and the bare BCNO nanoparticles. The fluorescence microscopy results support the flow cytometry experiments, which concluded that cell uptake efficiency increases from the bare BCNO, PEG@BCNO and PEI@BCNO, respectively.

3.3. In-Vitro Boron Neutron Capture Therapy Using Polymer-Coated BCNO Nanoparticles

To test our hypothesis that non-10B-enriched polymer-coated BCNO nanoparticles can exhibit a tumoricidal effect via BNCT, in vitro cellular neutron flux experiments were conducted using ALTS1C1 cells. A fixed concentration of 25 µg/mL dosage of the BCNO nanoparticles and BPA-fructose complex was used for the thermal neutron irradiation experiment, and the cellular cytotoxicity was low after 4 h of incubation. Before neutron irradiation, the ALTS1C1 cells incubated with BPA, bare BCNO, and PEG@BCNO showed negligible cell death, whereas PEI@BCNO showed ~3% of cell death, according to the cell viability analysis (Figure 9). The neutron flux experiments were conducted using the Tsing Hua Open-Pool Reactor (THOR) at Hsinchu, Taiwan. In our study, we chose a thermal neutron beam intensity of 1 × 109 n/cm2 s based on the literature [43]. ALTS1C1 cells incubated with BCNO nanoparticles were exposed to thermal neutron irradiation for 15 and 30 min, with a neutron beam intensity of 1 × 109 n/cm2 s. The optical densities were normalized to the control set of experiments without nanoparticle incubation and thermal neutron irradiation, and the cell viabilities were obtained using the MTS assay. After thermal neutron irradiation, the ALTS1C1 cells that were internalized with the bare BCNO, PEG@BCNO, and PEI@BCNO had acute cell death compared to the controlled group (Figure 9). More cell deaths were observed when the neutron irradiation time was increased from 15 to 30 min for all the ALTS1C1 cells internalized with BCNO nanoparticles. Remarkably, our study showed that the non-10B-enriched bare BCNO, PEG@BCNO, and PEI@BCNO caused acute cell deaths of 24%, 37%, and 43%, respectively, after 30 min of neutron irradiation (27 × 1011 n/cm2 neutron dose). Compared to the state-of-the-art 10B-enriched BPA-F complex treatment, only 17% of cell death was measured. Although the ALTS1C1 cells showed negligible intracellular boron uptake (Figure 7), the tumoricidal effect of the bare BCNO nanoparticles on the ALTS1C1 cells can be explained by the slight differences in sample preparation for the intracellular boron uptake and neutron flux experiments. According to the neutron flux experiment protocols, residual-free BCNO nanoparticles could remained on the well plate, which was subsequently irradiated with a slow thermal neutron beam. Thus, the residual BCNO nanoparticles that remained on the plate produced LET particles during the thermal irradiation, inducing a moderate cell-killing effect. Since LET particles have a path length of 5–9 µm, cells within the ionizing radiation path will be affected. Furthermore, the slight differences between the tumoricidal effects of PEI@BCNO and PEG@BCNO despite the large differences in the intracellular boron uptake (Figure 7) can be explained by the exocytosis mechanism of nanoparticles. Since the cell viability analysis was conducted 6 h after neutron irradiation, there is a high probability that the PEI@BCNO nanoparticles were pumped out from the ALTS1C1 cells via the exocytosis mechanism during the 6 h incubation period. This could also explain the small differences in the cell viability of the ALTS1C1 cells upon being treated with PEI@BCNO and PEG@BCNO. In future studies, more investigations will be conducted to clarify this hypothesis. Nevertheless, we showed that the non-10B-enriched PEG@BCNO and PEI@BCNO exhibited effective tumoricidal effects because of the enhanced intercellular localization achieved through polymer functionalization and the high boron content in the BCNO nanoparticles. This proof-of-concept demonstration created an opportunity for a new economical approach toward designing a safer and more potent boron nanodrug for BNCT application.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, we have successfully demonstrated an innovative approach in developing a non-10B enriched boron nanodrug for BNCT with potent tumoricidal effect. Through polymer functionalization of the quasi-spherical BCNO nanoparticle with PEI and PEG polymer ligands, their tumor killing effect, cytotoxicity, cell uptake, and optical properties can be modulated. The PEI@BCNO was engineered to possess a positive charge surface potential on the BCNO nanoparticle and thus demonstrated a higher in vitro cell penetration (~48 µg B/g of cell), while the PEG@BCNO nanoparticles exhibited significantly reduction in cell cytotoxicity and with moderate intercellular cell uptake (~16 µg B/g of cell). An in vitro neutron flux experiment confirmed that the non-10B enriched polymer-coated BCNO nanoparticles resulted in 24%, 37% and 43% of acute cell death for ALTS1C1 incubated with bare BCNO, PEG@BCNO and PEI@BCNO, respectively. Under similar neutron dose irradiation and nanoparticles dosing, this study demonstrated higher tumor killing effect compared to the state-of-the-art boron nanodrug and the BPA-F molecular drugs (13% cell death). In vivo BNCT studies will be performed to evaluate the tumoricidal effect of polymer-coated BCNO nanoparticles and their biodistribution in mice. This research could potentially pave a new and economical approach towards designing a safer and more potent boron nanodrug for BNCT application.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nano11112936/s1, Figure S1: XRD pattern of the as prepared BCNO displaying a broad peak ca. 26.6° and another broad peak at 43.1°, which represents the (002) plane reflection of hexagonal boron nitride(h-BN) and the unresolved reflection planes of h-BN, respectively.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.-Y.K.; methodology, P.-Y.K., C.-S.C., C.-W.C.; software, C.-W.C.; validation, P.-Y.K., C.-S.C., T.-W.W., formal analysis, C.-W.C., P.-Y.K.; investigation, C.-W.C., Y.-C.C., W.-J.Y., C.-Y.W., C.-Y.H. resources, P.-Y.K., C.-S.C., T.-W.W.; writing—original draft preparation, C.-W.C.; writing—review and editing, P.-Y.K., C.-S.C., T.-W.W.; visualization, P.-Y.K.; supervision, P.-Y.K., C.-S.C., T.-W.W.; project administration, P.-Y.K., C.-S.C., T.-W.W.; funding acquisition, P.-Y.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Ministry of Science and Technology Taiwan (MOST 108-2113-M-007-030-).

Data Availability Statement

The data is available on reasonable request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Dymova, M.A.; Taskaev, S.Y.; Richter, V.A.; Kuligina, E.V. Boron Neutron Capture Therapy: Current Status and Future Perspectives. Cancer Commun. 2020, 40, 406–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Nedunchezhian, K. Boron Neutron Capture Therapy––A Literature Review. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2016, 10, ZE01–ZE04. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Barth, R.F.; Goodman, J.H.; Gupta, N.; Yang, W. Boron Neutron Capture Therapy of Brain Tumors: An Emerging Therapeutic Modality. Neurosurgery 2018, 18, 433–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Wittig, A.; Malago, M.; Collette, L.; Huiskamp, R.; Bührmann, S.; Nievaart, V.; Kaiser, G.M.; Jöckel, K.-H.; Schmid, K.W.; Ortmann, U.; et al. Uptake of Two 10B-Compounds in Liver Metastases of Colorectal Adenocarcinoma for Extracorporeal Irradiation with Boron Neutron Capture Therapy (EORTC Trial 11001). Int. J. Cancer 2007, 122, 1164–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Menéndez, P.R.; Roth, B.M.C.; Pereira, M.D.; Casal, M.R.; González, S.J.; Feld, D.B.; Santa Cruz, G.A.; Kessler, J.; Longhino, J.; Blaumann, H.; et al. BNCT for Skin Melanoma in Extremities: Updated Argentine Clinical Results. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2009, 67, S50–S53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Yanagie, H.; Higashi, S.; Seguchi, K.; Ikushima, I.; Fujihara, M.; Nonaka, Y.; Oyama, K.; Maruyama, S.; Hatae, R.; Suzuki, M.; et al. Pilot Clinical Study of Boron Neutron Capture Therapy for Recurrent Hepatic Cancer Involving the Intra-Arterial Injection of a 10BSH-Containing WOW Emulsion. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2014, 88, 32–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Slatkin, D.N. A History of Boron Neutron Capture Therapy of Brain Tumours: Postulation of a Brain Radiation Dose Tolerance Limit. Brain 1991, 114, 1609–1629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Fuwa, N.; Suzuki, M.; Sakurai, Y.; Nagata, K.; Kinashi, Y.; Masunaga, S.; Maruhashi, A.; Imahori, Y.; Kodaira, T.; Tachibana, H.; et al. Treatment Results of Boron Neutron Capture Therapy Using Intra-Arterial Administration of Boron Compounds for Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer. Br. J. Radiol. 2008, 81, 749–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Hung, Y.-H.; Lin, Y.-C.; Lin, Y.-T.; Shih, G.-W.; Liao, J.-W.; Chen, K.-S.; Liu, H.-M.; Chen, Y.-W.; Chuang, Y.-J.; Yang, C.-M.; et al. Therapeutic Efficacy and Radiobiological Effects of Boric Acid-Mediated BNCT in a VX2 Multifocal Liver Tumor-Bearing Rabbit Model. Anticancer Res. 2019, 39, 5495–5504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Kageji, T.; Otersen, B.; Gabel, D.; Huiskamp, R.; Nakagawa, Y.; Matsumoto, K. Interaction of Mercaptoundecahydrododecaborate ŽBSH/with Phosphatidylcholine: Relevance to Boron Neutron Capture Therapy. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Lipids Lipid Metab. 1998, 1391, 377–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kankaanranta, L.; Seppälä, T.; Koivunoro, H.; Saarilahti, K.; Atula, T.; Collan, J.; Salli, E.; Kortesniemi, M.; Uusi-Simola, J.; Välimäki, P.; et al. Boron Neutron Capture Therapy in the Treatment of Locally Recurred Head-and-Neck Cancer: Final Analysis of a Phase I/II Trial. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. 2012, 82, e67–e75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wang, L.W.; Wang, S.J.; Chu, P.Y.; Ho, C.Y.; Jiang, S.H.; Liu, Y.W.H.; Liu, Y.H.; Liu, H.M.; Peir, J.J.; Chou, F.I.; et al. BNCT for Locally Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer: Preliminary Clinical Experience from a Phase I/II Trial at Tsing Hua Open-Pool Reactor. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2011, 69, 1803–1806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hu, K.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, L.; Xie, L.; Wang, L.; Xu, H.; Josephson, L.; Liang, S.H.; Zhang, M.-R. Boron Agents for Neutron Capture Therapy. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2020, 405, 213139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Fuentes, I.; García-Mendiola, T.; Sato, S.; Pita, M.; Nakamura, H.; Lorenzo, E.; Teixidor, F.; Marques, F.; Viñas, C. Metallacarboranes on the Road to Anticancer Therapies: Cellular Uptake, DNA Interaction, and Biological Evaluation of Cobaltabisdicarbollide [COSAN]. Chemistry 2018, 24, 17239–17254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kawai, K.; Nishimura, K.; Okada, S.; Sato, S.; Suzuki, M.; Takata, T.; Nakamura, H. Cyclic RGD-Functionalized Closo-Dodecaborate Albumin Conjugates as Integrin Targeting Boron Carriers for Neutron Capture Therapy. Mol. Pharm. 2020, 17, 3740–3747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Oleshkevich, E.; Morancho, A.; Saha, A.; Galenkamp, K.M.O.; Grayston, A.; Crich, S.G.; Alberti, D.; Protti, N.; Comella, J.X.; Teixidor, F.; et al. Combining Magnetic Nanoparticles and Icosahedral Boron Clusters in Biocompatible Inorganic Nanohybrids for Cancer Therapy. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 2019, 20, 101986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Ferrer-Ugalde, A.; Sandoval, S.; Pulagam, K.R.; Muñoz-Juan, A.; Laromaine, A.; Llop, J.; Tobias, G.; Núñez, R. Radiolabeled Cobaltabis(Dicarbollide) Anion–Graphene Oxide Nanocomposites for In Vivo Bioimaging and Boron Delivery. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2021, 4, 1613–1625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Azab, A.-K.; Srebnik, M.; Doviner, V.; Rubinstein, A. Targeting Normal and Neoplastic Tissues in the Rat Jejunum and Colon with Boronated, Cationic Acrylamide Copolymers. J. Control. Release 2005, 106, 14–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ignatius, A.A.; Claes, L. In Vitro Biocompatibility of Bioresorbable Polymers: Poly(~, DL-Lactide) and Poly(L-Lactide-Co-Glycolide). Biomaterials 1996, 17, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Takeuchi, I.; Nomura, K.; Makino, K. Hydrophobic Boron Compound-Loaded Poly(l-Lactide-Co-Glycolide) Nanoparticles for Boron Neutron Capture Therapy. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2017, 159, 360–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Takeuchi, I.; Tomoda, K.; Hamano, A.; Makino, K. Effects of Physicochemical Properties of Poly(Lactide-Co-Glycolide) on Drug Release Behavior of Hydrophobic Drug-Loaded Nanoparticles. Colloids Surf. Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2017, 520, 771–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Xiong, H.; Zhou, D.; Qi, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Xie, Z.; Chen, X.; Jing, X.; Meng, F.; Huang, Y. Doxorubicin-Loaded Carborane-Conjugated Polymeric Nanoparticles as Delivery System for Combination Cancer Therapy. Biomacromolecules 2015, 16, 3980–3988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Cai, J.; Soloway, A.H.; Barth, R.F.; Adams, D.M.; Hariharan, J.R.; Wyzlic, I.M.; Radcliffe, K. Boron-Containing Polyamines as DNA Targeting Agents for Neutron Capture Therapy of Brain Tumors: Synthesis and Biological Evaluation. J. Med. Chem. 1997, 40, 3887–3896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liko, F.; Hindré, F.; Fernandez-Megia, E. Dendrimers as Innovative Radiopharmaceuticals in Cancer Radionanotherapy. Biomacromolecules 2016, 17, 3103–3114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Parrott, M.C.; Marchington, E.B.; Valliant, J.F.; Adronov, A. Synthesis and Properties of Carborane-Functionalized Aliphatic Polyester Dendrimers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 12081–12089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Shukla, S.; Wu, G.; Chatterjee, M.; Yang, W.; Sekido, M.; Diop, L.A.; Müller, R.; Sudimack, J.J.; Lee, R.J.; Barth, R.F.; et al. Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Folate Receptor-Targeted Boronated PAMAM Dendrimers as Potential Agents for Neutron Capture Therapy. Bioconjug. Chem. 2003, 14, 158–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Wolinsky, J.; Grinstaff, M. Therapeutic and Diagnostic Applications of Dendrimers for Cancer Treatment. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2008, 60, 1037–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Altieri, S.; Balzi, M.; Bortolussi, S.; Bruschi, P.; Ciani, L.; Clerici, A.M.; Faraoni, P.; Ferrari, C.; Gadan, M.A.; Panza, L.; et al. Carborane Derivatives Loaded into Liposomes as Efficient Delivery Systems for Boron Neutron Capture Therapy. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 52, 7829–7835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Fang, J.; Nakamura, H.; Maeda, H. The EPR Effect: Unique Features of Tumor Blood Vessels for Drug Delivery, Factors Involved, and Limitations and Augmentation of the Effect. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2011, 63, 136–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Feakes, D.A.; Shelly, K.; Knobler, C.B.; Hawthorne, M.F. Na3[B20H17NH3]: Synthesis and Liposomal Delivery to Murine Tumors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1994, 91, 3029–3033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Feakes, D.A.; Shelly, K.; Hawthorne, M.F. Selective Boron Delivery to Murine Tumors by Lipophilic Species Incorporated in the Membranes of Unilamellar Liposomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1995, 92, 1367–1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Feng, B.; Tomizawa, K.; Michiue, H.; Miyatake, S.; Han, X.-J.; Fujimura, A.; Seno, M.; Kirihata, M.; Matsui, H. Delivery of Sodium Borocaptate to Glioma Cells Using Immunoliposome Conjugated with Anti-EGFR Antibodies by ZZ-His. Biomaterials 2009, 30, 1746–1755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Malam, Y.; Loizidou, M.; Seifalian, A.M. Liposomes and Nanoparticles: Nanosized Vehicles for Drug Delivery in Cancer. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2009, 30, 592–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Shelly, K.; Feakes, D.A.; Hawthorne, M.F.; Schmidt, P.G.; Krisch, T.A.; Bauer, W.F. Model Studies Directed toward the Boron Neutron-Capture Therapy of Cancer: Boron Delivery to Murine Tumors with Liposomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1992, 89, 9039–9043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Ueda, M.; Ashizawa, K.; Sugikawa, K.; Koumoto, K.; Nagasaki, T.; Ikeda, A. Lipid-Membrane-Incorporated Arylboronate Esters as Agents for Boron Neutron Capture Therapy. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2017, 15, 1565–1569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Gedda, L.; Olsson, P.; Pontén, J.; Carlsson, J. Development and in Vitro Studies of Epidermal Growth Factor−Dextran Conjugates for Boron Neutron Capture Therapy. Bioconjug. Chem. 1996, 7, 584–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Holmberg, A.; Meurling, L. Preparation of Sulfhydrylborane-Dextran Conjugates for Boron Neutron Capture Therapy. Bioconjug. Chem. 1993, 4, 570–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Sumitani, S.; Nagasaki, Y. Boron Neutron Capture Therapy Assisted by Boron-Conjugated Nanoparticles. Polym. J. 2012, 44, 522–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Chen, J.; Yang, Q.; Liu, M.; Lin, M.; Wang, T.; Zhang, Z.; Zhong, X.; Guo, N.; Lu, Y.; Xu, J.; et al. Remarkable Boron Delivery of IRGD-Modified Polymeric Nanoparticles For Boron Neutron Capture Therapy. Int. J. Nanomed. 2019, 14, 8161–8177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Liu, J.; Ai, X.; Zhang, H.; Zhuo, W.; Mi, P. Polymeric Micelles with Endosome Escape and Redox-Responsive Functions for Enhanced Intracellular Drug Delivery. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 2019, 15, 373–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Petersen, M.S.; Petersen, C.C.; Agger, R.; Sutmuller, M.; Jensen, M.R.; Sørensen, P.G.; Mortensen, M.W.; Hansen, T.; Bjørnholm, T.; Gundersen, H.J.; et al. Boron Nanoparticles Inhibit Tumour Growth by Boron Neutron Capture Therapy in the Murine B16-OVA Model. Anticancer Res. 2008, 28, 571–576. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  42. Kuthala, N.; Vankayala, R.; Li, Y.-N.; Chiang, C.-S.; Hwang, K.C. Engineering Novel Targeted Boron-10-Enriched Theranostic Nanomedicine to Combat against Murine Brain Tumors via MR Imaging-Guided Boron Neutron Capture Therapy. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1700850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Ferreira, T.H.; Miranda, M.C.; Rocha, Z.; Leal, A.S.; Gomes, D.A.; Sousa, E.M.B. An Assessment of the Potential Use of BNNTs for Boron Neutron Capture Therapy. Nanomaterials 2017, 7, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Horváth, L.; Magrez, A.; Golberg, D.; Zhi, C.; Bando, Y.; Smajda, R.; Horváth, E.; Forró, L.; Schwaller, B. In Vitro Investigation of the Cellular Toxicity of Boron Nitride Nanotubes. ACS Nano 2011, 5, 3800–3810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Lee, C.H.; Drelich, J.; Yap, Y.K. Superhydrophobicity of Boron Nitride Nanotubes Grown on Silicon Substrates. Langmuir 2009, 25, 4853–4860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Pakdel, A.; Zhi, C.; Bando, Y.; Nakayama, T.; Golberg, D. Boron Nitride Nanosheet Coatings with Controllable Water Repellency. ACS Nano 2011, 5, 6507–6515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Yu, J.; Qin, L.; Hao, Y.; Kuang, S.; Bai, X.; Chong, Y.-M.; Zhang, W.; Wang, E. Vertically Aligned Boron Nitride Nanosheets: Chemical Vapor Synthesis, Ultraviolet Light Emission, and Superhydrophobicity. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 414–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Nakamura, H.; Koganei, H.; Miyoshi, T.; Sakurai, Y.; Ono, K.; Suzuki, M. Antitumor Effect of Boron Nitride Nanotubes in Combination with Thermal Neutron Irradiation on BNCT. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2015, 25, 172–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Singh, B.; Kaur, G.; Singh, P.; Singh, K.; Kumar, B.; Vij, A.; Kumar, M.; Bala, R.; Meena, R.; Singh, A.; et al. Nanostructured Boron Nitride With High Water Dispersibility For Boron Neutron Capture Therapy. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 35535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Mateti, S.; Wong, C.S.; Liu, Z.; Yang, W.; Li, Y.; Li, L.H.; Chen, Y. Biocompatibility of Boron Nitride Nanosheets. Nano Res. 2018, 11, 334–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Chen, T.; Zhang, Q.; Xie, Z.; Tan, C.; Chen, P.; Zeng, Y.; Wang, F.; Liu, H.; Liu, Y.; Liu, G.; et al. Carbon Nitride Modified Hexagonal Boron Nitride Interface as Highly Efficient Blue LED Light-Driven Photocatalyst. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2018, 238, 410–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Dwivedi, J.; Kumar, P.; Kedawat, G.; Gupta, B. K New Emerging Rare-Earth Free Yellow Emitting 2D BCNO Nanophosphor for White Light Emitting Diodes. New J. Chem. 2015, 39, 5161–5170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Fang, S.; Li, G.; Zhao, M.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, L.; Li, L. Non-Rare Earth Containing BCNO Phosphors: Chemical Activation for LED Application. J. Lumin. 2017, 192, 428–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ogi, T.; Kaihatsu, Y.; Iskandar, F.; Wang, W.-N.; Okuyama, K. Facile Synthesis of New Full-Color-Emitting BCNO Phosphors with High Quantum Efficiency. Adv. Mater. 2008, 20, 3235–3238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zhang, X.; Lu, Z.; Liu, H.; Lin, J.; Xu, X.; Meng, F.; Zhao, J.; Tang, C. Blue Emitting BCNO Phosphors with High Quantum Yields. J. Mater. Chem. C 2015, 3, 3311–3317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Jia, X.; Li, L.; Yu, J.; Gao, X.; Yang, X.; Lu, Z.; Zhang, X.; Liu, H. Facile Synthesis of BCNO Quantum Dots with Applications for Ion Detection, Chemosensor and Fingerprint Identification. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2018, 203, 214–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Kanodarwala, F.K.; Moret, S.; Spindler, X.; Lennard, C.; Roux, C. Nanoparticles Used for Fingermark Detection—A Comprehensive Review. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Forensic Sci. 2019, 1, e1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ren, M.; Han, W.; Bai, Y.; Ge, C.; He, L.; Zhang, X. Melamine Sponge-Assisted Synthesis of Porous BCNO Phosphor with Yellow-Green Luminescence for Cr6+ Detection. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2020, 244, 122673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wu, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Huang, H.; Su, Z.; Chen, S.; Rong, M. BCNO QDs and ROS Synergistic Oxidation Effect on Fluorescence Enhancement Sensing of Tetracycline. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021, 332, 129530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Gupta, B.K.; Kumar, P.; Kedawat, G.; Kanika, K.; Vithayathil, S.A.; Gangwar, A.K.; Singh, S.; Kashyap, P.K.; Lahon, R.; Singh, V.N.; et al. Tunable Luminescence from Two Dimensional BCNO Nanophosphor for High-Contrast Cellular Imaging. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 41486–41494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Xue, Q.; Zhang, H.; Zhu, M.; Wang, Z.; Pei, Z.; Huang, Y.; Huang, Y.; Song, X.; Zeng, H.; Zhi, C. Hydrothermal Synthesis of Blue-Fluorescent Monolayer BN and BCNO Quantum Dots for Bio-Imaging Probes. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 79090–79094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Dong, G.; Liu, X.; Xiao, X.; Zhang, Q.; Lin, G.; Ma, Z.; Chen, D.; Qiu, J. Tunable Emission of BCNO Nanoparticle-Embedded Polymer Electrospun Nanofibers. Electrochem. Solid State Lett. 2009, 12, K53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Suryamas, A.B.; Munir, M.M.; Ogi, T.; Khairurrijal; Okuyama, K. Intense Green and Yellow Emissions from Electrospun BCNO Phosphor Nanofibers. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 12629–12631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Kim, A.; Suzuki, M.; Matsumoto, Y.; Fukumitsu, N.; Nagasaki, Y. Non-Isotope Enriched Phenylboronic Acid-Decorated Dual-Functional Nano-Assembles for an Actively Targeting BNCT Drug. Biomaterials 2021, 268, 120551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Van Wijk, J.; Van Deventer, N.; Harmzen, E.; Meuldijk, J.; Klumperman, B. Formation of Hybrid Poly(Styrene-Co-Maleic Anhydride)–Silica Microcapsules. J. Mater. Chem. B 2014, 2, 4826–4835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Sun, J.; Ling, P.; Gao, F. A Mitochondria-Targeted Ratiometric Biosensor for PH Monitoring and Imaging in Living Cells with Congo-Red-Functionalized Dual-Emission Semiconducting Polymer Dots. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 11703–11710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Wang, W.-N.; Ogi, T.; Kaihatsu, Y.; Iskandar, F.; Okuyama, K. Novel Rare-Earth-Free Tunable-Color-Emitting BCNO Phosphors. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 5183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Tang, C.; Bando, Y.; Zhi, C.; Golberg, D. Boron–Oxygen Luminescence Centres in Boron–Nitrogen Systems. Chem. Commun. 2007, 44, 4599–4601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Srivastava, I.; Khamo, J.S.; Pandit, S.; Fathi, P.; Huang, X.; Cao, A.; Haasch, R.T.; Nie, S.; Zhang, K.; Pan, D. Influence of Electron Acceptor and Electron Donor on the Photophysical Properties of Carbon Dots: A Comparative Investigation at the Bulk-State and Single-Particle Level. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29, 1902466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Yang, S.; Sun, J.; Li, X.; Zhou, W.; Wang, Z.; He, P.; Ding, G.; Xie, X.; Kang, Z.; Jiang, M. Large-Scale Fabrication of Heavy Doped Carbon Quantum Dots with Tunable-Photoluminescence and Sensitive Fluorescence Detection. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 8660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Li, L.; Dong, T. Photoluminescence Tuning in Carbon Dots: Surface Passivation or/and Functionalization, Heteroatom Doping. J. Mater. Chem. C 2018, 6, 7944–7970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Geick, R.; Perry, C.H.; Rupprecht, G. Normal Modes in Hexagonal Boron Nitride. Phys. Rev. 1966, 146, 543–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Lu, F.; Zhang, X.; Lu, Z.; Xu, X.; Tang, C. Effects of Annealing Temperature and Ambient Atmosphere on the Structure and Photoluminescence of BCNO Phosphors. J. Lumin. 2013, 143, 343–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Huang, K.; Liang, L.; Chai, S.; Tumuluri, U.; Li, M.; Wu, Z.; Sumpter, B.G.; Dai, S. Aminopolymer Functionalization of Boron Nitride Nanosheets for Highly Efficient Capture of Carbon Dioxide. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 16241–16248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Wang, Y.; Tong, L.; You, Y.; Tu, L.; Zhou, M.; Liu, X. Polyethylenimine Assisted Bio-Inspired Surface Functionalization of Hexagonal Boron Nitride for Enhancing the Crystallization and the Properties of Poly(Arylene Ether Nitrile). Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Chen, T.; Zheng, S.; Li, X.; Zhang, Y.; Wong, Y.-S. PEG-nanolized ultrasmall selenium nanoparticles overcome drug resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma HepG2 cells through induction of mitochondria dysfunction. Int. J. Nanomed. 2012, 7, 3939–3949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Chien, L.C.; Chiang, C.W.; Lao, C.C.; Lin, Y.-I.; Lin, H.-W.; Keng, P.Y. Boron Carbon Oxynitride as a Novel Metal-Free Photocatalyst. 2021, in press. [Google Scholar]
  78. Wu, Y.; He, Y.; Zhou, T.; Chen, C.; Zhong, F.; Xia, Y.; Xie, P.; Zhang, C. Synergistic Functionalization of H-BN by Mechanical Exfoliation and PEI Chemical Modification for Enhancing the Corrosion Resistance of Waterborne Epoxy Coating. Prog. Org. Coat. 2020, 142, 105541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Akin, M.; Bongartz, R.; Walter, J.G.; Demirkol, D.O.; Stahl, F.; Timur, S.; Scheper, T. PAMAM-Functionalized Water Soluble Quantum Dots for Cancer Cell Targeting. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 11529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Cotoruelo, L.M.; Marqués, M.D.; Díaz, F.J.; Rodríguez-Mirasol, J.; Rodríguez, J.J.; Cordero, T. Equilibrium and Kinetic Study of Congo Red Adsorption onto Lignin-Based Activated Carbons. Transp. Porous Media 2010, 83, 573–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Kashyout, A.-H.; Soliman, H.; Nabil, M.; Bishara, A. Impact of Congo Red Dye in Nano-Porous Silicon as PH-Sensor. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2015, 216, 279–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Espargaró, A.; Llabrés, S.; Saupe, S.J.; Curutchet, C.; Luque, F.J.; Sabaté, R. On the Binding of Congo Red to Amyloid Fibrils. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 8104–8107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Jagusiak, A.; Konieczny, L.; Krol, M.; Marszalek, P.; Piekarska, B.; Piwowar, P.; Roterman, I.; Rybarska, J.; Stopa, B.; Zemanek, G. Intramolecular Immunological Signal Hypothesis Revived-Structural Background of Signalling Revealed by Using Congo Red as a Specific Tool. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 2015, 14, 1104–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Klunk, W. Chrysamine-G Binding to Alzheimer and Control Brain: Autopsy Study of a New Amyloid Probe. Neurobiol. Aging 1995, 16, 541–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Yakupova, E.I.; Bobyleva, L.G.; Vikhlyantsev, I.M.; Bobylev, A.G. Congo Red and Amyloids: History and Relationship. Biosci. Rep. 2019, 39, BSR20181415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Zemanek, G.; Jagusiak, A.; Chłopaś, K.; Piekarska, B.; Stopa, B. Congo Red Fluorescence upon Binding to Macromolecules––A Possible Explanation for the Enhanced Intensity. Bio-Algorithms Med-Syst. 2017, 13, 69–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. AL-Thabaiti, S.A.; Aazam, E.S.; Khan, Z.; Bashir, O. Aggregation of Congo Red with Surfactants and Ag-Nanoparticles in an Aqueous Solution. Spectrochim. Acta. A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2016, 156, 28–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Litefti, K.; Freire, M.S.; Stitou, M.; González-Álvarez, J. Adsorption of an Anionic Dye (Congo Red) from Aqueous Solutions by Pine Bark. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 16530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Costa, A.L.; Gomes, A.C.; Lopes, A.D.; Da Silva, J.P.; Pillinger, M.; Gonçalves, I.S.; Seixas de Melo, J.S. Evaluation of the Supramolecular Interaction of Congo Red with Cucurbiturils Using Mass Spectrometry and Spectroscopic Methods. New J. Chem. 2020, 44, 2587–2596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Wang, S.-C.; Hong, J.-H.; Hsueh, C.; Chiang, C.-S. Tumor-Secreted SDF-1 Promotes Glioma Invasiveness and TAM Tropism toward Hypoxia in a Murine Astrocytoma Model. Lab. Investig. J. Tech. Methods Pathol. 2012, 92, 151–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Ni, D.; Zhang, J.; Bu, W.; Xing, H.; Han, F.; Xiao, Q.; Yao, Z.; Chen, F.; He, Q.; Liu, J.; et al. Dual-Targeting Upconversion Nanoprobes across the Blood–Brain Barrier for Magnetic Resonance/Fluorescence Imaging of Intracranial Glioblastoma. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 1231–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Joshi, S.; Ergin, A.; Wang, M.; Reif, R.; Zhang, J.; Bruce, J.N.; Bigio, I.J. Inconsistent Blood Brain Barrier Disruption by Intraarterial Mannitol in Rabbits: Implications for Chemotherapy. J. Neurooncol. 2011, 104, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Taskin, I.C. Hexagonal Boron Nitrides Reduce the Oxidative Stress on Cells. Nanotechnology 2020, 31, 215101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Wang, N.; Wang, H.; Tang, C.; Lei, S.; Shen, W.; Wang, C.; Wang, G.; Wang, Z.; Wang, L. Toxicity Evaluation of Boron Nitride Nanospheres and Water-Soluble Boron Nitride in Caenorhabditis Elegans. Int. J. Nanomed. 2017, 12, 5941–5957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Kafil, V.; Omidi, Y. Cytotoxic Impacts of Linear and Branched Polyethylenimine Nanostructures in A431 Cells. BioImpacts BI 2011, 1, 23. [Google Scholar]
  96. Moghimi, S.M.; Symonds, P.; Murray, J.C.; Hunter, A.C.; Debska, G.; Szewczyk, A. A Two-Stage Poly(Ethylenimine)-Mediated Cytotoxicity: Implications for Gene Transfer/Therapy. Mol. Ther. 2005, 11, 990–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Mosquera, J.; García, I.; Liz-Marzán, L.M. Cellular Uptake of Nanoparticles versus Small Molecules: A Matter of Size. Acc. Chem. Res. 2018, 51, 2305–2313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Oh, N.; Park, J.-H. Endocytosis and Exocytosis of Nanoparticles in Mammalian Cells. Int. J. Nanomed. 2014, 9, 51–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Nanomaterials 11 02936 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Schematic illustration of functionalization of BCNO nanoparticles with (a) PEI, (b) PEG, and (c) PSMACR ligands.
Scheme 1. Schematic illustration of functionalization of BCNO nanoparticles with (a) PEI, (b) PEG, and (c) PSMACR ligands.
Nanomaterials 11 02936 sch001
Nanomaterials 11 02936 g001 550
Figure 1. TEM images of (a) the as prepared BCNO nanoparticles and (b) PEG@BCNO after ligand exchange.
Figure 1. TEM images of (a) the as prepared BCNO nanoparticles and (b) PEG@BCNO after ligand exchange.
Nanomaterials 11 02936 g001
Nanomaterials 11 02936 g002 550
Figure 2. PL spectrum of the bare and functionalized BCNO upon photoexcitation at 365 nm of (a) stacked PL spectrum of quasi-spherical BCNO nanoparticles coated with PEI, bare BCNO (black trace), PEI@BCNO (green trace) (b) overlay PL spectrum of the bare BCNO (black trace) and PEG@BCNO (pink trace).
Figure 2. PL spectrum of the bare and functionalized BCNO upon photoexcitation at 365 nm of (a) stacked PL spectrum of quasi-spherical BCNO nanoparticles coated with PEI, bare BCNO (black trace), PEI@BCNO (green trace) (b) overlay PL spectrum of the bare BCNO (black trace) and PEG@BCNO (pink trace).
Nanomaterials 11 02936 g002
Nanomaterials 11 02936 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) FTIR spectrum of bare BCNO and PEI@BCNO (b) FTIR spectrum of PEG@BCNO (c) Zeta potential measurement of the surface charge of BCNO and polymer functionalized BCNO.
Figure 3. (a) FTIR spectrum of bare BCNO and PEI@BCNO (b) FTIR spectrum of PEG@BCNO (c) Zeta potential measurement of the surface charge of BCNO and polymer functionalized BCNO.
Nanomaterials 11 02936 g003
Nanomaterials 11 02936 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) XPS C1s spectrum of BCNO (b) XPS N1s spectrum of BCNO (c) XPS C1s spectrum of PEI@BCNO (d) XPS N1s spectrum of PEI@BCNO.
Figure 4. (a) XPS C1s spectrum of BCNO (b) XPS N1s spectrum of BCNO (c) XPS C1s spectrum of PEI@BCNO (d) XPS N1s spectrum of PEI@BCNO.
Nanomaterials 11 02936 g004
Nanomaterials 11 02936 g005 550
Figure 5. Photoluminescence spectrum of (a) BCNO (black trace) and PSMACRs@BCNO (red trace) upon excitation at 365 nm (b) Congo red dye only (red trance) and PSMACRs@BCNO (black trace) excited at 490 nm (c) UV-vis spectrum of the PSMACRs@BCNO at different pH values.
Figure 5. Photoluminescence spectrum of (a) BCNO (black trace) and PSMACRs@BCNO (red trace) upon excitation at 365 nm (b) Congo red dye only (red trance) and PSMACRs@BCNO (black trace) excited at 490 nm (c) UV-vis spectrum of the PSMACRs@BCNO at different pH values.
Nanomaterials 11 02936 g005
Nanomaterials 11 02936 g006 550
Figure 6. (a) MTT assay of BCNO on ALTS1C1 (b) MTT assay of PEI@BCNO on ALTS1C1 (c) MTT assay of PEG@BCNO on ALTS1C1 (d) flow cytometry of bare BCNO, PEI@BCNO and PEG@BCNO.
Figure 6. (a) MTT assay of BCNO on ALTS1C1 (b) MTT assay of PEI@BCNO on ALTS1C1 (c) MTT assay of PEG@BCNO on ALTS1C1 (d) flow cytometry of bare BCNO, PEI@BCNO and PEG@BCNO.
Nanomaterials 11 02936 g006
Nanomaterials 11 02936 g007 550
Figure 7. ICP-MS cell uptake of PEI@BCNO, PEG@BCNO and bare BCNO with ALTS1C1 cells.
Figure 7. ICP-MS cell uptake of PEI@BCNO, PEG@BCNO and bare BCNO with ALTS1C1 cells.
Nanomaterials 11 02936 g007
Nanomaterials 11 02936 g008 550
Figure 8. Fluorescence microscopy images of bare BCNO, PEG@BCNO and PEI@BCNO incubated with ALTS1C1 cells for 4 h. The red fluorescence corresponds to the ALTS1C1 cells stained with Fast-dil, while the green fluorescent correspond to the BCNO nanoparticles. Scale bar: 50 µm.
Figure 8. Fluorescence microscopy images of bare BCNO, PEG@BCNO and PEI@BCNO incubated with ALTS1C1 cells for 4 h. The red fluorescence corresponds to the ALTS1C1 cells stained with Fast-dil, while the green fluorescent correspond to the BCNO nanoparticles. Scale bar: 50 µm.
Nanomaterials 11 02936 g008
Nanomaterials 11 02936 g009 550
Figure 9. Normalized cell viabilities of ALTS1C1 cells as a function of neutron irradiation dose and BCNO nanoparticles. The ALTS1C1 cells were internalized with bare BCNO, PEG@BCNO and PEI@BCNO nanoparticles. The cell viability was measured at 6 h after neutron irradiation. The error bar represents the standard deviation of five independent measurements.
Figure 9. Normalized cell viabilities of ALTS1C1 cells as a function of neutron irradiation dose and BCNO nanoparticles. The ALTS1C1 cells were internalized with bare BCNO, PEG@BCNO and PEI@BCNO nanoparticles. The cell viability was measured at 6 h after neutron irradiation. The error bar represents the standard deviation of five independent measurements.
Nanomaterials 11 02936 g009
Table
Table 1. XPS surface elemental composition of BCNO and PEI@BCNO.
Table 1. XPS surface elemental composition of BCNO and PEI@BCNO.
SampleBCNO
BCNO40.6%7.6%36.3%15.5%
PEI@BCNO3.4%54.9%25.8%16.8%
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chiang, C.-W.; Chien, Y.-C.; Yu, W.-J.; Ho, C.-Y.; Wang, C.-Y.; Wang, T.-W.; Chiang, C.-S.; Keng, P.-Y. Polymer-Coated Nanoparticles for Therapeutic and Diagnostic Non-10B Enriched Polymer-Coated Boron Carbon Oxynitride (BCNO) Nanoparticles as Potent BNCT Drug. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 2936. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11112936

AMA Style

Chiang C-W, Chien Y-C, Yu W-J, Ho C-Y, Wang C-Y, Wang T-W, Chiang C-S, Keng P-Y. Polymer-Coated Nanoparticles for Therapeutic and Diagnostic Non-10B Enriched Polymer-Coated Boron Carbon Oxynitride (BCNO) Nanoparticles as Potent BNCT Drug. Nanomaterials. 2021; 11(11):2936. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11112936

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chiang, Chen-Wei, Yun-Chen Chien, Wen-Jui Yu, Chia-Yu Ho, Chih-Yi Wang, Tzu-Wei Wang, Chi-Shiun Chiang, and Pei-Yuin Keng. 2021. "Polymer-Coated Nanoparticles for Therapeutic and Diagnostic Non-10B Enriched Polymer-Coated Boron Carbon Oxynitride (BCNO) Nanoparticles as Potent BNCT Drug" Nanomaterials 11, no. 11: 2936. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11112936

APA Style

Chiang, C.-W., Chien, Y.-C., Yu, W.-J., Ho, C.-Y., Wang, C.-Y., Wang, T.-W., Chiang, C.-S., & Keng, P.-Y. (2021). Polymer-Coated Nanoparticles for Therapeutic and Diagnostic Non-10B Enriched Polymer-Coated Boron Carbon Oxynitride (BCNO) Nanoparticles as Potent BNCT Drug. Nanomaterials, 11(11), 2936. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11112936

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop