Next Article in Journal
Exploring SnxTi1−xO2 Solid Solutions Grown onto Graphene Oxide (GO) as Selective Toluene Gas Sensors
Next Article in Special Issue
Hydrogen Peroxide Detection by Super-Porous Hybrid CuO/Pt NP Platform: Improved Sensitivity and Selectivity
Previous Article in Journal
Development of Pd/TiO2 Porous Layers by Pulsed Laser Deposition for Surface Acoustic Wave H2 Gas Sensor
Previous Article in Special Issue
Design of Heat-Conductive hBN–PMMA Composites by Electrostatic Nano-Assembly
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 10
Issue 4
10.3390/nano10040759
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Soft X-ray Absorption Spectroscopic Investigation of Li(Ni0.8Co0.1Mn0.1)O2 Cathode Materials

by
Jitendra Pal Singh
1,
Jae Yeon Park
2,
Keun Hwa Chae
3,
Docheon Ahn
1,* and
Sangsul Lee
1,*
1
Pohang Accelerator Laboratory, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang 37673, Korea
2
Radiation Equipment Research Division, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, Jeongup 56212, Korea
3
Advanced Analysis Center, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Seoul 02792, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2020, 10(4), 759; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10040759
Submission received: 30 March 2020 / Revised: 10 April 2020 / Accepted: 12 April 2020 / Published: 15 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanotechnologies and Nanomaterials: Selected Papers from CCMR)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Herein, we report the soft X-ray absorption spectroscopic investigation for Li(Ni0.8Co0.1Mn0.1)O2 cathode material during charging and discharging. These measurements were carried out at the Mn L-, Co L-, and Ni L-edges during various stages of charging and discharging. Both the Mn and Co L-edge spectroscopic measurements reflect the invariance in the oxidation states of Mn and Co ions. The Ni L-edge measurements show the modification of the oxidation state of Ni ions during the charging and discharging process. These studies show that eg states are affected dominantly in the case of Ni ions during the charging and discharging process. The O K-edge measurements reflect modulation of metal–oxygen hybridization as envisaged from the area-ratio variation of spectral features corresponding to t2g and eg states.

1. Introduction

Rechargeable lithium batteries with layered oxide cathode materials have rapidly risen to prominence as fundamental devices for green and sustainable energy [1,2,3]. Thus, efforts to understand electrochemistry to improve these batteries’ performances in terms of commercial development for electric vehicles [4] and large-scale grid storage applications [5] are underway. Charging capacity, thermal stability, and capacity fading are certain factors that determine a battery’s performance [6,7], leaving ample scope for researchers to investigate. These efforts are reflected in the recent structure and electronic/atomic structural investigation of cathode materials by numerous techniques in the context of battery performance [8,9,10]. The metal ions of these materials undergo transformations in terms of oxidation state and local structural order during typical battery operation [11,12]. This affects the nature of metal–oxygen hybridization. It has been reported that these factors are influenced by the orbital symmetry states of materials’ constituent ions [13,14]. Thus, investigations related to these orbital energy levels using an appropriate technique can provide atomic level insights during the charging and discharging of batteries.
X-ray absorption spectroscopic (XAS) measurements based on soft X-rays can probe the L-edge of transition metals, which are important constituents of layered oxide cathode materials. These measurements, termed near-edge X-ray absorption fine structures (NEXAFS), depict orbital symmetry states associated with the oxidation of metal ions [15,16]. The O K-edge of these layered oxide materials can also be successfully investigated with soft X-rays. The O K-edge NEXAFS measurements infer the symmetry states associated with metal–oxygen interactions in these materials [17,18]. Thus, soft XAS measurements can give a complete account of underlying phenomena due to the orbital symmetry states in the oxide cathode material during charging and discharging. To depict these phenomena, the Ni-rich cathode material, Li(Ni0.8Co0.1Mn0.1)O2, is selected for the present investigation and denoted as NCM811. NCM811 is a well-known layered oxide cathode material and preferred for Li rechargeable batteries due to its high capacity [19,20]. Thus, this work investigates NCM811 cathode materials during charging and discharging using soft XAS.

2. Experimental Details

X-ray diffraction (XRD) experiments prior to electrochemical testing of cathode material were performed with the 9B high-resolution powder diffraction (HRPD) beamline of the Pohang accelerator laboratory (PAL) [21]. Pristine cathode material was also investigated using X-ray absorption near-edge spectroscopy (XANES) imaging measurements to reveal the local electronic structure. These measurements at the Mn K-, Co K-, and Ni K-edge were performed with the 7C X-ray nano imaging (XNI) beamline of the PAL. This beamline utilizes zone plate-based transmission X-ray nanoscopy, which is a kind of transmission X-ray microscopy (TXM), for image formation. A zone plate of diameter 150 µm and 40 nm outermost zone width was used for measurements. This arrangement gave a spatial resolution of 40 nm and a field of view (FOV) of around 50 µm. The X-ray absorption images based on TXM were captured at various energies within a 1 eV interval in the range −20 to 80 eV from the main edge energies of each respective element. The XANES spectrum was extracted from these X-ray absorption images [22].
Soft XAS measurements of this cathode material at various charging and discharging states were performed with the 10D XAS-KIST beamline of the same laboratory in total electron yield (TEY) mode. The grating with 1100 grooves/mm was used to measure spectra at the Mn L-, Co L-, Ni L-, and O K-edges. The obtained spectra were background-subtracted and normalized with respect to the post-edge height [23].

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 1 shows the Rietveld refinement of the synchrotron high-resolution powder diffraction patterns of the NMC811 cathode material. The diffraction peaks in the XRD patterns are associated with rhombohedral R3m space group with Li-ion on the 3a site, transition metal ions on the 3b site, and oxygen ion on the 6c site [24]. The Rietveld refinement procedure is adopted to estimate the structural parameter for this material. Table 1 collates the structural and refined parameters. The refined values of the lattice parameter “a” and “c” are 2.871 and 14.195 Å, respectively. The unit cell volume is 101.34 Å3. The transition metal oxide (TM–O) and Li–O bond distances are 1.978 and 2.0978 Å, respectively. These parameters are similar to those reported for this composition of NMC cathode material [25].
In this structure, almost 2.52% of Ni ions occupy the Li-ions site (Table 1). This kind of effect is common in NCM cathode materials and associated with the almost similar size of Li and Ni ions [26].
The chemical state of the constituent ions of the NCM811 cathode material was investigated using XANES-imaging measurements. Figure 2 shows the XANES spectra of the NCM811 cathode material extracted from the TXM images. In Figure 2, these spectra are shown at the Ni K-edge, Mn K-edge, and Co K-edge extracted from the original TXM images. These spectra exhibit that the main edge energy of Mn, Co, and Ni ions exist at the energy of 6.552 ± 1, 7.721 ± 1, and 8.342 ± 1 eV, respectively, in this cathode material. These values are higher than those corresponding to metal edges for each ion showing a higher oxidation state of Mn (6.539 eV), Co (7.709 eV), and Ni (8.333 eV) ions in cathode material [27]. The value of the Mn K-edge energy is similar to that of MnO2, revealing the 4+ oxidation state of Mn ions in the NCM811 cathode material [28,29]. The Mn L-edge NEXAFS spectrum of this material also supports this oxidation state (Figure S1). The main energy of the Co ions occurs at 7.721 ± 1 eV, as estimated by the XANES spectrum that coincides with the spectrum of materials with a 3+ oxidation state [30,31]. The Co L-edge NEXAFS spectrum further favors this (Figure S2). The main edge energy value for Ni ions is associated with the 3+ oxidation state, which is characteristic of the NCM811 cathode material and reported by numerous authors [32,33,34]. This oxidation state of Ni ions is also evident from the Ni L-edge NEXAFS spectrum (Figure S3).
The secondary particles of cathode materials are generally 10–25 µm; thus the XANES spectrum of the selected region equivalent to the size of the secondary particles is extracted from the specific region of interest (ROI). Figure 3a shows the extracted Mn K-edge spectra of the selected ROI. These spectra exhibit spectral features a1 and b1 centered at 6.558 ± 1 and 6.573 ± 1 eV, respectively (Figure 3a). These spectral features are clearly visible in the spectra extracted from region R1, R2, and R3 (Figure 3a). This envisages that Mn ions exist at almost the same oxidation state in each region of the cathode materials. Similarly, the Co K-edge spectra for each region R1, R2, and R3 (Figure 3b) exhibit spectral features a2, b2, and c2 centered at 7.728 ± 1, 7.737 ± 1, and 7.746 ± 1 eV, respectively (Figure 3b). The oxidation state of Ni ions in NMC cathode materials plays an important role during the charging and discharging process. Thus, the Ni K-edge spectra were also measured using XANES-imaging and shown in Figure 3c. The Ni K-edge spectra in the different regions R1, R2, and R3, (Figure 3c) exhibit spectral features a3, b3, c3, and d3. These spectral features are centered at 8.351 ± 1, 8.368 ± 1, 8.384 ± 1, and 8.404 ± 1 eV, respectively (Figure 3c). Thus, these measurements show that all metal ions exist in an almost matching oxidation state despite the different ROIs.
The NCM811 cathode material exhibits structure and local electronic structure concurrent with previous reports; therefore, electrochemical testing was performed on this material. Figure 4 shows the charging and discharging curve of the NCM811 cathode material. Various states of charging (SOC) are shown by the numerals, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5. These numerals denote the charging capacity of 0 (pristine), 40, 100, 160, and 215 mAhg−1, respectively. The values at the capacity of 247, 302, 357, and 409 mAhg−1 represent the depth of discharging and are represented by the numerals 6, 7, 8, and 9, respectively.
Figure 5a shows the Mn L-edge spectra of NCM811 during charging and discharging. During the charging and discharging process, the spectral features A1, B1, and C1 present in the spectra at various stages of charging and discharging (Figure 5a). The spectral features A1, B1, and C1 are centered around 640.4 ± 0.4, 642.9 ± 0.4, and 653.3 ± 0.4 eV, respectively, in all states of charging and discharging (i.e., 1–9). The spectral features A1 and B1 are associated with L3; however, C1 is associated with the L2-edge. The presence of spectral features that correspond to the L3 and L2-edges in the Mn L-edge spectra are due to electronic transitions to the 3d levels from the 2p3/2 and 2p1/2 levels, respectively. The presence of spectral features at an almost identical position (Figure S4) and the lack of change of shape of spectra reveal that Mn ions exist in the same oxidation state during the charging and discharging process. These observations were also obtained from the XANES study of cathode materials during battery operation [32,33].
Figure 5b shows the Co L-edge spectra of NCM811 during charging and discharging. During these processes (i.e., 1–9), the spectral features A2 and B2 appeared in the spectra (Figure 5b). These spectral features were assigned to the L3- and L2-edges. Further splitting into t2g and eg symmetry state was absent in these spectra. This kind of behavior is observed in Co-based layered oxide cathode materials [35,36]. Spectral features A2 centered at 779.1 ± 0.4 and 793.3 ± 0.4 eV remain at almost the same position during charging and discharging (Figure S5). This demonstrates that during the charging and discharging process, the oxidation state of Co ions does not alter in NCM811 cathode materials. Figure 6a shows the Ni L-edge spectra of cathode material during charging (stages 1–5) and discharging (stages 6–9). The spectral features A3, B3, C3, and D3 appear in the spectra for charging and discharging (Figure 6a). These spectral features are centered at 851.4 ± 0.4 (A3), 853.3 ± 0.4 (B3), 868.4 ± 0.4 (C3), and 869.5 ± 0.4 (D3) eV in the spectra of the pristine NCM811 cathode. The presence of these spectral features is associated with the presence of Ni ions in an octahedral crystal field. These spectral features represent t2g (L3), eg (L3), t2g (L3), and eg (L3) symmetry states. The positions of spectral feature A3 remain the same during charging and discharging. The position of spectral feature B3 is slightly modified during charging and discharging (Figure 6b); this evinces that the eg symmetry states are affected dominantly during the charging and discharging state. No role is played by the t2g states.
Another interesting change observed in the Ni L-edge spectra is the relative change in intensity of spectral features A3 and B3 associated with the t2g and eg symmetry states. The changes are associated with the modification of the oxidation state of Ni ions in the cathode material during charging and discharging [37]. To get deeper insights into this behavior, the area ratio of the spectral features A3 and B3 was determined (Figure 7a) by de-convoluting the L3-edge region using the Gaussian function. The de-convolution spectra for states 1, 5, and 9 are shown in Figure 7b–d. The ratio of these spectral features changes alongside the charging and discharging states. The ratio is reduced with charging, indicating transformation to a higher oxidation state. After discharging, the ratio equivalent to the pristine state is observed, indicating that the oxidation state of Ni ions is reversible.
Figure 8 shows the O K-edge spectra of the NCM811 cathode during the charging and discharging process. Both the pre-edge and post-edge region of the O K-edge spectra reflect the systematic changes during charging and discharging. The pre-edge region of the O K-edge spectra exhibits spectral features A4 and B4 centered around 528.5 and 531.5 eV, respectively, for state 1 (Figure 8b). These spectral features also appear in the spectra for the charging/discharging states 2–9 at almost the same position. The intensities of these features change during charging and discharging.
Features C4 and D4 appear in the post-edge region of the O K-edge spectra (Figure 8a). These spectral features occur at 537.8 ± 0.4 and 541.9 ± 0.4 eV, respectively, for various charging (1–5) and discharging (6–9) states.
Because the pre-edge region of the O K-edge spectrum is effective to gather information of metal (3d)–O(2p) hybridization in transition metal oxides [17,18,38]; hence, the intensity ratio of spectral features A4 and B4 corresponding to t2g and eg symmetry state is determined and shown in Figure 9a. Figure 9b–d shows the de-convoluted spectra for states 1, 5, and 9. The intensity ratio is at its maximum for the fully charged cathode and reduces thereafter. Similar behavior is also observed by Tian et al. [39]. This shows the modulation of metal–oxygen hybridization during charging and discharging. The ratio is different from that obtained from the Ni L-edge spectra (Figure 7a); this may be due to the influence of these symmetry states from other metal ions such as Mn and Co [39] as well as to the creation of oxygen vacancies during the charging and discharging process [18].

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, we have successfully performed soft X-ray spectroscopic measurements during charging and discharging on a well-characterized NCM811 cathode material. These results envisage that oxidation state of Mn and Co ions do not influenced by the charging and discharging process. The oxidation state of Ni ions is affected by charging and discharging; however, in the case of Ni ions, eg states are dominantly influenced. Although the oxidation state of Ni ions changes, metal–oxygen hybridization during charging and discharging is affected by the presence of other metal ions.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/10/4/759/s1, Figure S1: Mn L-edge NEXAFS spectra of NCM811 with reference oxide; Figure S2: Co L-edge NEXAFS spectra of NCM811 with reference oxide; Figure S3: Ni L-edge NEXAFS spectra of NCM811 with NiO; Figure S4: Positions of spectral features A1 and B1 of Mn L-edge spectra for various states; Figure S5: Positions of spectral features A2 and B2 of Co L-edge spectra for various states.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.P.S., D.A., and S.L.; methodology, J.Y.P., K.H.C., and J.P.S; software, J.Y.P.; validation, S.L., D.A., and K.H.C.; formal analysis, J.P.S.; investigation, J.P.S.; resources, S.L.; data curation, D.A.; writing—original draft preparation, J.P.S.; writing—review and editing, S.L. and D.A.; visualization, K.H.C.; supervision, S.L.; project administration, S.L. and D.A.; funding acquisition, S.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program (grant number: 2017R1C1B1011518) and EEMAP (grant number: 2017M3A7B4049173) through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Goodenough, J.B.; Park, K.S. The Li-Ion Rechargeable Battery: A Perspective. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 1167–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Nitta, N.; Wu, F.; Lee, J.T.; Yushin, G. Li-ion Battery Materials: Present and Future. Mater. Today 2015, 18, 1369–7021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Li, M.; Lu, J.; Chen, Z.; Amine, K. 30 Years of Lithium-Ion Batteries. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1800561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Kim, T.; Song, W.; Son, D.-Y.; Ono, L.K.; Qi, Y. Lithium-ion Batteries: Outlook on Present, Future, and Hybridized Technologies. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 2942–2964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Güra, T.M. Review of Electrical Energy Storage Technologies, Materials and Systems: Challenges and Prospects for Large-Scale Grid Storage. Energy Environ. Sci. 2018, 11, 2696–2767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tarascon, J.M.; Armand, M. Issues and Challenges Facing Rechargeable Lithium Batteries. Nature 2001, 414, 359–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Biasi, L.D.; Schwarz, B.; Brezesinski, T.; Hartmann, P.; Janek, J.; Ehrenberg, H. Chemical, Structural, and Electronic Aspects of Formation and Degradation Behavior on Different Length Scales of Ni-Rich NCM and Li-Rich HE-NCM Cathode Materials in Li-Ion Batteries. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1900985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, Y.; Pei, A.; Yan, K.; Sun, Y.; Wu, C.-L.; Joubert, L.M.; Chin, R.; Koh, A.L.; Yu, Y.; Perrino, J.; et al. Atomic Structure of Sensitive Battery Materials and Interfaces Revealed by Cryo–Electron Microscopy. Science 2017, 358, 506–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Yang, Z.; Gu, L.; Hu, Y.S.; Li, H. Atomic-Scale Structure-Property Relationships in Lithium Ion Battery Electrode Materials. Ann. Rev. Mater. Res. 2017, 47, 175–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Çelik, G.; Aktaş, S.; Ateş, Ş.; Özkendir, O.M.; Klysubun, W. Crystal and Electronic Structure Study of the Li2Mn1-xNdxO3 Battery Cathode. Prog. Nat. Sci. Mater. Int. 2019, 29, 119–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Alemu, T.; Wang, F.M. In situ Electrochemical Synchrotron Radiation for Li-ion Batteries. J. Synchrotron Rad. 2018, 25, 151–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Hwang, B.J.; Tsai, Y.W.; Santhanam, R.; Wu, Y.W.; Hu, S.G.; Lee, J.F.; Liu, D.G. Evolution of Local Electronic and Atomic Structure of Co-Doped LiMn2O4 Cathode Material for Lithium Rechargeable Batteries. J. Power Sources 2003, 123, 206–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ragavendran, K.R.; Mandal, P.; Yarlagadda, S. Correlation between Battery Material Performance and Cooperative Electron-Phonon Interaction in LiCoyMn2−yO4. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2017, 110, 143901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Liu, C.; Neale, Z.G.; Cao, G. Understanding Electrochemical Potentials of Cathode Materials in Rechargeable Batteries. Mater. Today 2016, 19, 109–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tokura, Y.; Nagaosa, N. Orbital Physics in Transition-Metal Oxides. Science 2000, 288, 462–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Singh, V.; Major, D.T. Electronic Structure and Bonding in Co-Based Single and Mixed Valence Oxides: A Quantum Chemical Perspective. Inorg. Chem. 2016, 55, 3307–3315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Schuster, M.E.; Teschner, D.; Popovic, J.; Ohmer, N.; Girgsdies, F.; Tornow, J.; Willinger, M.G.; Samuelis, D.; Titirici, M.M.; Maier, J.; et al. Charging and Discharging Behavior of Solvothermal LiFePO4 Cathode Material Investigated by Combined EELS/NEXAFS Study. Chem. Mater. 2014, 26, 1040–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. House, R.A.; Maitra, U.; Jin, L.; Lozano, J.G.; Somerville, J.W.; Rees, N.H.; Naylor, A.J.; Duda, L.C.; Massel, F.; Chadwick, A.V.; et al. What Triggers Oxygen Loss in Oxygen Redox Cathode Materials? Chem. Mater. 2019, 31, 3293–3300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Xia, Y.; Zheng, J.; Wang, C.; Gu, M. Designing Principle for Ni-Rich Cathode Materials with High Energy Density for Practical Applications. Nano Energy 2018, 49, 434–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Schipper, F.; Erickson, E.M.; Erk, C.; Shin, J.Y.; Chesneau, F.F.; Aurbach, D. Recent Advances and Remaining Challenges for Lithium Ion Battery Cathodes. J. ElectroChem. Soc. 2017, 164, A6220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kim, J.; Ahn, D.; Kulshreshtha, C.; Sohn, K.-S.; Shin, N. Lithium Barium Silicate, Li2BaSiO4, from Synchrotron Powder Data. Acta Cryst. C 2009, 65, i14–i16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Park, J.Y.; Singh, J.P.; Lim, J.; Lee, S. Development of XANES Nanoscopy on BL7C at PLS-II. J. Synchrotron Rad. 2020, 27, 545–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Singh, J.P.; Kim, S.H.; Won, S.O.; Lee, I.J.; Chae, K.H. Atomic-Scale Investigation of MgO Growth on Fused Quartz Using Angle-Dependent NEXAFS Measurements. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 31275–31286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Lee, W.; Muhammad, S.; Kim, T.; Kim, H.; Lee, E.; Jeong, M.; Son, S.; Ryou, J.-H.; Yoon, W.-S. New Insight into Ni-Rich Layered Structure for Next-Generation Li Rechargeable Batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1701788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Weigel, T.; Schipper, F.; Erickson, E.M.; Susai, F.A.; Markovsky, B.; Aurbach, D. Structural and Electrochemical Aspects of LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 Cathode Materials Doped by Various Cations. ACS Energy Lett. 2019, 4, 508–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yoshio, M.; Noguchi, H.; Itoh, J.; Okada, M.; Mouri, T. Preparation and Properties of LiCoyMnxNi1−x−yO2 as a Cathode for Lithium Ion Batteries. J. Power Sources 2000, 90, 176–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ravel, B.; Newville, M. ATHENA, ARTEMIS, HEPHAESTUS: Data analysis for X-ray absorption spectroscopy using IFEFFIT. J. Synchrotron Rad. 2005, 12, 537–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Nam, K.W.; Kim, M.G.; Kim, K.B. In Situ Mn K-edge X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy Studies of Electrodeposited Manganese Oxide Films for Electrochemical Capacitors. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 749–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Manceau, A.; Marcus, M.A.; Grangeon, S. Determination of Mn valence states in mixed-valent manganates by XANES spectroscopy. Am. Mineral. 2012, 97, 816–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Okumura, T.; Yamaguchi, Y.; Shikano, M.; Kobayashia, H. Correlation of Lithium Ion Distribution and X-ray Absorption Near-Edge Structure in O3- and O2-Lithium Cobalt Oxides from First-Principle Calculation. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 17340–17348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ekwongsa, C.; Rujirawat, S.; Butnoi, P.; Vittayakorn, N.; Suttapun, M.; Yimnirun, R.; Kidkhunthod, P. Temperature Dependent Local Structure of LiCoO2 Determined by in-situ Co K-edge X-ray Absorption Fine Structure (EXAFS). Rad. Phys. Chem. 2019, 108545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bak, S.M.; Hu, E.; Zhou, Y.; Yu, X.; Senanayake, S.D.; Cho, S.J.; Kim, K.B.; Chung, K.Y.; Yang, X.Q.; Nam, K.W. Structural Changes and Thermal Stability of Charged LiNixMnyCozO2 Cathode Materials Studied by Combined In Situ Time-Resolved XRD and Mass Spectroscopy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 22594–22601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Sun, H.; Zhao, K. Electronic Structure and Comparative Properties of LiNixMnyCozO2 Cathode Materials. J. Phys. Chem. C 2017, 121, 6002–6010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Boesenberg, U.; Marcus, M.A.; Shukla, A.K.; Yi, T.; McDermott, E.; Teh, P.F.; Srinivasan, M.; Moewes, A.; Cabana, J. Asymmetric Pathways in the Electrochemical Conversion Reaction of NiO as Battery Electrode with High Storage Capacity. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 7133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Lin, F.; Markus, I.M.; Nordlund, D.; Weng, T.C.; Asta, M.D.; Xin, H.L.; Doeff, M.M. Surface Reconstruction and Chemical Evolution of Stoichiometric Layered Cathode Materials for Lithium-Ion Batteries. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Zhang, N.; Long, X.; Wang, Z.; Yu, P.; Han, F.; Fu, J.; Ren, G.X.; Wu, Y.; Zheng, S.; Huang, W.; et al. Mechanism Study on the Interfacial Stability of a Lithium Garnet-Type Oxide Electrolyte against Cathode Materials. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2018, 11, 5968–5976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sallis, S.; Pereira, N.; Mukherjee, P.; Quackenbush, N.F.; Faenza, N.; Schlueter, C.; Lee, T.-L.; Yang, W.L.; Cosandey, F.; Amatucci, G.G.; et al. Surface Degradation of Li1–xNi0.80Co0.15Al0.05O2 Cathodes: Correlating Charge Transfer Impedance with Surface Phase Transformations. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2016, 108, 263902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Singh, J.P.; Kuang, H.; Lee, S.; Chae, K.H. Investigation of Metal–Oxygen Hybridization Process during the Growth of ZnFe2O4 Films on MgO (100) Substrates. (To be communicated).
  39. Tian, C.; Nordlund, D.; Xin, H.L.; Xu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Sokaras, D.; Lin, F.; Doeff, M.M. Depth-Dependent Redox Behavior of LiNi0.6Mn0.2Co0.2O2. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2018, 165, A696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Nanomaterials 10 00759 g001 550
Figure 1. Rietveld refinement of the synchrotron high-resolution powder diffraction patterns of NCM811 cathode material prior to electrochemical testing.
Figure 1. Rietveld refinement of the synchrotron high-resolution powder diffraction patterns of NCM811 cathode material prior to electrochemical testing.
Nanomaterials 10 00759 g001
Nanomaterials 10 00759 g002 550
Figure 2. X-ray absorption near-edge spectroscopy (XANES) spectra at the Mn, Co, and Ni K-edges extracted (bulk mode) from transmission X-ray microscopy (TXM) images for NMC811 cathode material.
Figure 2. X-ray absorption near-edge spectroscopy (XANES) spectra at the Mn, Co, and Ni K-edges extracted (bulk mode) from transmission X-ray microscopy (TXM) images for NMC811 cathode material.
Nanomaterials 10 00759 g002
Nanomaterials 10 00759 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) Mn K-, (b) Co K-, and (c) Ni K-edge XANES spectra extracted from each region of interest (ROI), R1, R2, and R3, equivalent to the dimensions of secondary particles.
Figure 3. (a) Mn K-, (b) Co K-, and (c) Ni K-edge XANES spectra extracted from each region of interest (ROI), R1, R2, and R3, equivalent to the dimensions of secondary particles.
Nanomaterials 10 00759 g003
Nanomaterials 10 00759 g004 550
Figure 4. Various states of charging and discharging for NCM811 cathode materials.
Figure 4. Various states of charging and discharging for NCM811 cathode materials.
Nanomaterials 10 00759 g004
Nanomaterials 10 00759 g005 550
Figure 5. (a) Mn L-edge and (b) Co L-edge near-edge X-ray absorption fine structures (NEXAFS) spectra of NCM811 cathode material during charging and discharging.
Figure 5. (a) Mn L-edge and (b) Co L-edge near-edge X-ray absorption fine structures (NEXAFS) spectra of NCM811 cathode material during charging and discharging.
Nanomaterials 10 00759 g005
Nanomaterials 10 00759 g006 550
Figure 6. (a) Ni L-edge spectra and (b) energy of spectral features A3 and B3 of NCM811 cathode materials at stages 1–5 (charging) and 6–9 (discharging).
Figure 6. (a) Ni L-edge spectra and (b) energy of spectral features A3 and B3 of NCM811 cathode materials at stages 1–5 (charging) and 6–9 (discharging).
Nanomaterials 10 00759 g006
Nanomaterials 10 00759 g007 550
Figure 7. (a) The t2g/eg ratio estimated from the Ni L-edge spectra at various stages of charging and discharging. Here, (b–d) show the representative de-convoluted spectra for states 1, 5, and 9.
Figure 7. (a) The t2g/eg ratio estimated from the Ni L-edge spectra at various stages of charging and discharging. Here, (b–d) show the representative de-convoluted spectra for states 1, 5, and 9.
Nanomaterials 10 00759 g007
Nanomaterials 10 00759 g008 550
Figure 8. (a) O K-edge spectra and its (b) pre-edge region for the NCM811 cathode material during charging and discharging.
Figure 8. (a) O K-edge spectra and its (b) pre-edge region for the NCM811 cathode material during charging and discharging.
Nanomaterials 10 00759 g008
Nanomaterials 10 00759 g009 550
Figure 9. (a) The t2g/eg ratio estimated from the pre-edge region of the O K-edge spectra at various charging and discharging stages. Here, (b), (c), and (d) show the representative de-convoluted spectra for the 1, 5, and 9 states.
Figure 9. (a) The t2g/eg ratio estimated from the pre-edge region of the O K-edge spectra at various charging and discharging stages. Here, (b), (c), and (d) show the representative de-convoluted spectra for the 1, 5, and 9 states.
Nanomaterials 10 00759 g009
Table
Table 1. Structural parameters and reliability factors estimated from Rietveld refinement of the high-resolution powder diffraction (HRPD) pattern of the NMC811 cathode material prior to electrochemical testing.
Table 1. Structural parameters and reliability factors estimated from Rietveld refinement of the high-resolution powder diffraction (HRPD) pattern of the NMC811 cathode material prior to electrochemical testing.
a (Å)/c (Å)2.87402 (2)/14.2018 (1)
AtomSiteWyckoff positionsOccupancy *,$
Li3a0000.0812 (2)
Ni23a0000.0021 (2)
Ni13b000.50.0703 †
Co3b000.50.0075 †
Mn3b000.50.0032 †
O6c000.2419 (1)0.166 †
Reliability factorsRp = 6.67%, Rwp = 9.22%, Rexp = 5.99%, S = 1.54
* The normalized site occupation numbers in % are the following: Li1:Ni2(97.52:2.48), Ni1:Co:Mn (84.48:8.99:3.88), O (100) $ Fixed parameter. † Occupancy was achieved using the constraints. Li3a + Ni3a = 0.08333.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Singh, J.P.; Park, J.Y.; Chae, K.H.; Ahn, D.; Lee, S. Soft X-ray Absorption Spectroscopic Investigation of Li(Ni0.8Co0.1Mn0.1)O2 Cathode Materials. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 759. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10040759

AMA Style

Singh JP, Park JY, Chae KH, Ahn D, Lee S. Soft X-ray Absorption Spectroscopic Investigation of Li(Ni0.8Co0.1Mn0.1)O2 Cathode Materials. Nanomaterials. 2020; 10(4):759. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10040759

Chicago/Turabian Style

Singh, Jitendra Pal, Jae Yeon Park, Keun Hwa Chae, Docheon Ahn, and Sangsul Lee. 2020. "Soft X-ray Absorption Spectroscopic Investigation of Li(Ni0.8Co0.1Mn0.1)O2 Cathode Materials" Nanomaterials 10, no. 4: 759. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10040759

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop