Next Article in Journal
Development of Active Barrier Multilayer Films Based on Electrospun Antimicrobial Hot-Tack Food Waste Derived Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) and Cellulose Nanocrystal Interlayers
Next Article in Special Issue
Nano-Photocatalytic Materials: Possibilities and Challenges
Previous Article in Journal
Disruption of Cationic/Anionic Viscoelastic Surfactant Micellar Networks by Hydrocarbon as a Basis of Enhanced Fracturing Fluids Clean-Up
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Photocatalytic and Antibacterial Performance of Nitrogen-Doped TiO2: Surface-Structure Dependence and Silver-Deposition Effect
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:

Influence of Water on the Oxidation of NO on Pd/TiO2 Photocatalysts

M. J. Hernández Rodríguez
E. Pulido Melián
J. Araña
J. A. Navío
O. M. González Díaz
Dunia E. Santiago
1 and
J. M. Doña Rodríguez
Grupo de Fotocatálisis y Espectroscopia para Aplicaciones Medioambientales (FEAM. Unidad Asociada al CSIC por el Instituto de Ciencias de Materiales de Sevilla), Departamento de Química, Instituto de Estudios Ambientales y Recursos Naturales (i-UNAT), Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, 35017 Las Palmas, Spain
Centro Mixto CSIC-Universidad de Sevilla, Departamento de Química Inorgánica, Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Sevilla, Universidad de Sevilla, Avenida Américo Vespucio s/n, 41092 Sevilla, Spain
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2020, 10(12), 2354;
Submission received: 3 November 2020 / Revised: 24 November 2020 / Accepted: 25 November 2020 / Published: 27 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nano‐Photocatalytic Materials: Possibilities and Challenges)


Two series of new photocatalysts were synthesized based on modification with Pd of the commercial P25 photocatalyst (EVONIK®). Two techniques were employed to incorporate Pd nanoparticles on the P25 surface: photodeposition (series Pd-P) and impregnation (series Pd-I). Both series were characterized in depth using a variety of instrumental techniques: BET, DRS, XRD, XPS, TEM, FTIR and FESEM. The modified series exhibited a significant change in pore size distribution, but no differences compared to the original P25 with respect to crystalline phase ratio or particle size were observed. The Pd0 oxidation state was predominant in the Pd-P series, while the presence of the Pd2+ oxidation state was additionally observed in the Pd-I series. The photoactivity tests were performed in a continuous photoreactor with the photocatalysts deposited, by dip-coating, on borosilicate glass plates. A total of 500 ppb of NO was used as input flow at a volumetric flow rate of 1.2 L·min−1, and different relative humidities from 0 to 65% were tested. The results obtained show that under UV-vis or Vis radiation, the presence of Pd nanoparticles favors NO removal independently of the Pd incorporation method employed and independently of the tested relative humidity conditions. This improvement seems to be related to the different interaction of the water with the surface of the photocatalysts in the presence or absence of Pd. It was found in the catalyst without Pd that disproportionation of NO2 is favored through its reaction with water, with faster surface saturation. In contrast, in the catalysts with Pd, disproportionation took place through nitro-chelates and adsorbed NO2 formed from the photocatalytic oxidation of the NO. This different mechanism explains the greater efficiency in NOx removal in the catalysts with Pd. Comparing the two series of catalysts with Pd, Pd-P and Pd-I, greater activity of the Pd-P series was observed under both UV-vis and Vis radiation. It was shown that the Pd0 oxidation state is responsible for this greater activity as the Pd-I series improves its activity in successive cycles due to a reduction in Pd2+ species during the photoactivity tests.

1. Introduction

The continuing deterioration of the environment is a problem that has been acquiring ever greater relevance over the last few decades. In recent years, there has been growing concern about the deterioration in air quality. The emission of contaminating gases into the atmosphere—principally as a result of anthropogenic activity—is one of the issues that has generated the greatest concern. The legally established limits in various cities around the world are being exceeded on a regular basis. Among the most dangerous gases are ozone and nitrogen oxides or NOx [1]. These atmospheric pollutants can provoke numerous harmful chemical reactions, making their elimination a priority [2]. Heterogeneous photocatalysis has been shown to be an effective tool for such elimination, as reported in several published studies [3,4,5,6]. Various articles have demonstrated its efficiency in the elimination of NOx [7,8]. Nonetheless, it is also clear that its application with solar radiation needs to be improved as the current commercially available catalysts do not show significant photocatalytic activity in this wavelength range (400–700 nm) [9]. One of the techniques that can be used to enhance this aspect is the incorporation of metals into/onto the semiconductor [9]. In this respect, catalyst modification can be internal or surface-based. With surface modification, the metals are incorporated onto the surface of the catalyst without altering its internal structure and without affecting the arrangement of atoms in the crystalline lattice of the catalyst [10,11]. As a result of previous studies [12], it is known that the incorporation of Pd onto TiO2 can enhance photocatalyst absorption in the visible range (400–700 nm). Pd is one of the most extensively used noble metals in heterogeneous catalysis and photocatalysis after Pt and Au to improve photocatalytic efficiency in pollutant removal in water [13] and air [14]. Lee et al. [15] compared the results that they obtained according to the nature of the TiO2 employed, the type of noble metal (Pd or Pt), the deposition method and the type of photocatalytic reaction. Some of the results were apparently contradictory, showing that the Pt-TiO2 and Pd-TiO2 systems were not always more effective than the unmodified TiO2. The number of publications related to the study of the photoactivity of Pd-modified photocatalysts has grown in recent years [16,17,18,19,20]. However, very few studies have been published on NO elimination and none on in-depth analyses of the effect of the presence of Pd on the elimination mechanism. Some publications have focused very specifically on the synthesis of new materials modified with Pd [21,22], but without placing any importance on their reactivity, while others [14,23,24] have tested modified commercial materials under very specific conditions—including some not very common values for these conditions of radiation, temperature, humidity and NO concentrations. We consider that this present work constitutes an extension and completion of these previous studies. Consequently, taking as a starting point the knowledge acquired from these studies, this work evaluates the incorporation of Pd on TiO2 by impregnation and photodeposition for NOx removal at 500 ppb concentration, at a temperature of 25 °C and with and without humidity. Identification is made through infrared spectroscopy of the species that are formed in NOx oxidation, and the influence of the water and palladium species on reactivity is discussed. In addition, visible (Vis) radiation was used as well as UV-vis, and photocatalyst stability was tested after long periods of radiation and reuse. This comprises one of the major goals of this study since photocatalyst reuse is one of the issues that need to be solved for the practical application of this technology.

2. Experimental

2.1. Synthesis of Photocatalysts

The modified TiO2 catalyst was Aeroxide TiO2 P25 (Evonik Degussa GmbH, Germany). The catalysts modified with Pd were obtained by photodeposition (P) and impregnation (I). The photodeposition of Pd was described previously by Maicu et al. [12]. The P25 was suspended in water at a concentration of 5 g·L−1. A total of 400 mL of the suspension was taken, and 9.2 mL of isopropanol added, and 0.5% in weight of Pd with respect to the TiO2 from palladium (II) nitrate dihydrate (Sigma-Aldrich). The mixture was placed under a low continuous flow of N2 to maintain an inert atmosphere, illuminated for 6 h with a medium-pressure 400 W mercury lamp (2.6 × 10−7 Einstein·s−1·L−1) (Photochemical Reactors Ltd.) with emission principally in the UV-A region, and kept refrigerated at a temperature below 293 K. The suspensions were filtered using a 0.45 µm filter and dried at 383 K for 24 h. Pd impregnation was described by Wu et al. [14]. In brief, 4 g of P25 were mixed with 50 mL of a Pd(NO3)2/HCl solution (40 mg in 100 mL HCl 36% v/v). Contact was maintained for 48 h under stirring, with subsequent drying at 333 K for 12 h.

2.2. Dip Coating

The catalysts were deposited onto previously washed 50 cm2 borosilicate 3.3 plates with a dip-coating procedure (KSV-DC Dip-Coater). The plates were introduced into a 14 g·L−1 suspension of the catalyst in methanol at a rate of 500 mm·min−1, left in the suspension for 20 s and withdrawn at a rate of 120 mm·min−1. These cycles were repeated in each case until the desired catalyst mass was reached (1.16 ± 0.01 mg·cm−2). The plates were dried at 373 K for 2 h.

2.3. Analysis Techniques

Analyses of the crystalline structure were performed by X-ray diffraction (XRD Bruker D8 Advance) with a monochromatized source of Cu Kα1 radiation (λ = 0.15406 nm) at 1.6 kW (40 kV, 40 mA); samples were prepared by placing a drop of a concentrated ethanol dispersion of particles onto a single-crystal silicon plate. Crystal sizes in the different phases were estimated from line broadening of the corresponding X-ray diffraction peaks using the Scherrer equation. Anatase-rutile fractions were calculated, taking into account the relative diffraction peak intensities of crystalline planes (101) and (111) of anatase and rutile, respectively. The morphology of the samples was studied by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) using a Philips CM 200 instrument operating at 200 kV and a nominal structural resolution of ~0.25 nm. BET surface area, pore volume and pore size measurements were carried out by N2 adsorption at 77 K using a Micromeritics 2010 instrument. Diffuse reflectance spectra were recorded on a Varian Cary 5 spectrometer equipped with an integrating sphere using PTFE (poly-tetra-fluoroethylene) as a reference to study light absorption properties of the samples [25]. Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) images were obtained using a Hitachi S-4800 microscope to determine the thickness of the deposit on the plates. Surface characterization by X-ray photoelectron (XPS) was conducted on a SPECS spectrometer, working with a constant pass energy of 40 eV. The spectrometer main chamber was maintained at a pressure of 5–6 × 10−10 bar, and the machine was equipped with a PHOIBOS 150 9MCD hemispherical electron analyzer, using Al Kα (hv) 1486.6 eV at 250 W and 12.5 kV. The carbon 1 s signal (284.6 eV) was used as the internal energy reference in all measurements. All photoelectron spectra were analyzed using Casa-XPS software. A Thermo Scientific-Nicolet iS10 spectrophotometer was used for the FTIR studies. The catalyst was placed between two CaF2 mirrors, and a 4000–1000 cm−1 measurement range, 2 cm−1 resolution and forward/backward mirror speeds of 10 kHz/6.2 kHz, respectively, were used.

2.4. Photoactivity Study

The photoactivity tests were performed as described in previous studies where a scheme of the setup is presented [26]. The 500 ppb concentration of NO was obtained from dilution with the air of a 100 ppm concentration of NO (supplied by Air Liquide). Humidity was added by passing the appropriate amount of dilution air through a thermostatic water bath and was controlled by means of a Rotronic HygroPalm probe. All workflows were controlled with mass flow controllers. The borosilicate glass plates were placed in a nylon reactor with a borosilicate window and a headspace of 0.5 cm. The total workflow was 1.2 L·min−1 at 1 atm. The light source employed was a 10 W·m−2 Osram Ultra Vitalux 300 W lamp. For the tests with visible light, a 420 nm Schott cutoff filter was placed between reactor and lamp. The NOx quantification was followed with a Horiba APNA-370 N/S analyzer. The results shown are the average of two tests with a maximum deviation of 5%. In all cases, the system is kept in the dark for 30 min to reach adsorption equilibrium and then the lamp is turned on (t = 0). The results are expressed as percentages of [NO] removed, [NO2] generated and [NOx] removed in accordance with the following equations:
NO removed / % = 0 t ( [ NO ] o [ NO ] t ) dt 0 t [ NO ] o dt · 100
NO 2 generated / % = 0 t ( [ NO 2 ] t [ NO 2 ] o ) dt 0 t [ NO ] o dt · 100
NO x removed / % = 0 t [ ( [ NO ] o + [ NO 2 ] o ) ( [ NO ] t + [ NO 2 ] t ) ] dt 0 t [ NO ] o dt · 100
where [NO]o and [NO2]o are the concentrations are the concentrations at the inlet of the reactor once the adsorption equilibrium has been reached, and [NO]t and [NO2]t are the concentrations at the outlet of the photoreactor at any time under illumination.

3. Results

3.1. Characterization of the Modified Catalysts

Table 1 shows the characterization of the P25 and Pd-modified catalysts. Modification of the P25 photocatalyst through the incorporation of Pd does not result in changes in the crystalline structure of the photocatalyst. The anatase percentage is maintained, and the anatase/rutile crystallite sizes barely vary. The diffractograms can be consulted in Supporting Information. The TiO2 crystalline phases present in all the catalysts are anatase (A) and rutile (R), identified by the Crystallography Open Database (COD) as COD9015929 and COD9015662, respectively. No presence of metal is observed, as expected for the weight percentage of 0.5% of Pd, an amount which is difficult to detect using X-ray diffraction. Differences are observed in the colors of the Pd-modified photocatalysts (Figure 1). The Pd-P is grayish in color, whereas the Pd-I is more yellowish, indicating the presence of Pd0 in the Pd-P [14].
Figure 2a shows the DRS UV-vis for the Pd-modified photocatalysts. Comparing the P25 spectrum with the modified samples, similar behavior is observed with a slight shift from 400 nm to longer wavelengths (“redshift”) in the sample order Pd-P > Pd-I > P25. Pd-I has a broad band between 450 and 550 nm centered at 470 nm due to a d-d transition of Pd2+ [27], responsible for the yellowish-brown color of the photocatalyst. Pd-P does not display bands characteristic of Pd in the visible range, although its absorbance is higher than for P25 in all the visible range due to its grayish color.
Table 1 shows the surface area values obtained after modification of the P25 with Pd. No significant changes are observed, as also reported by other authors [24]. It is seen that the incorporation of metal particles at these low percentages does not entail any significant change in the surface area of the bare TiO2 (P25). However, in the pore size distribution represented in Figure 2b, there can be seen an increase of the high interparticle mesoporosity in detriment to the low intraparticle mesoporosity, with this being more noticeable for Pd-I than for Pd-P. This would seem to suggest that the metal deposits have occupied the pores of lesser volume, as has also been observed for other metals such as Pt and Au in previous studies [28,29].
The TEM study enabled the identification of the deposits of Pd particles incorporated on the P25. It can be seen for both samples that the deposits are very small at the nanometer scale (Figure 3).
The samples were analyzed by XPS in order to determine the oxidation states of the Pd incorporated on the surface of the titanium oxide. Table 2 shows the energies of the constituent elements of the different catalysts. For all the photocatalysts, the binding energy of the Ti was 458.0 ± 0.5 eV, corresponding to the Ti4+ signal of the TiO2 (9). The O signal appears at values close to 529.5 ± 0.5 eV, attributable principally to the oxygen of the crystalline lattice of the TiO2 [30]. A slight shift in the Ti and O signals was detected with respect to the P25 due to the surface inclusion of the Pd. This has previously been observed with the incorporation of other metals (Pt and Au) onto P25 [31]. The Olattice/Ti ratio remained close to the theoretical value at around 2 in the modified photocatalysts. This indicates that the modification carried out in this work by means of the deposition of palladium particles is only superficial. An analysis of the oxidation state of the Pd can be made from Figure 4.
Figure 4a,b show the 3d spectra of the Pd for Pd-P and Pd-I, respectively. For Pd-P, the predominant species is the metallic Pd (335.5 eV (3d5/2)) [32]. Despite the small amount of metal in the samples—which makes the peak-background ratio low—a certain asymmetry can be observed due to a shoulder at higher binding energies that could be due to the presence of Pd2+, as described in other samples obtained by photodeposition [12,14,21]. For Pd-I, it can be seen that the doublet corresponding to the Pd2+ (336.4 eV (3d5/2)) is clearly defined, apparently in the form of PdO according to its value [30].

3.2. Characterization of the Deposits

The deposits of 1.16 mg·cm−2 of P25 with Pd, independently of the modification method, display a continuous profile irregular in thickness, ranging between 198-1690 nm and 150–1437 nm, for Pd-P and Pd-I, respectively (Figure 5). Using ASTM Standard D3330/D3330M, it was determined that the Pd deposits show good adhesion, similar to the unmodified P25 deposit.

3.3. Comparison of Oxidation of the NOx

Table 3 shows the photoactivity results obtained according to [NO] removed, [NO2] generated and [NOx] removed for Pd-P, Pd-I and P25 for comparison purposes. Reactivity was tested with different degrees of humidity. The test profiles are shown in Figure 6.
It can be observed from Table 3 that the presence of Pd entails an enhancement in NOx removal both in the absence and presence of humidity. The percentage of removed NO remains practically unaltered for all the photocatalysts, independently of the relative humidity being tested. With respect to the generated NO2, it can be seen that, in general, as the humidity increases, more NO2 is generated.
Longer studies of up to 24 h duration were undertaken of UV-vis irradiation under more adverse conditions of 65% RH (Figure 7a,c,e) in order to evaluate the capacity for NOx elimination of the catalysts before the occurrence of surface saturation by HNO3 [33]. It was found that both Pd-I and Pd-P have a superior NOx removal capacity than that of P25. The P25 had a removal rate of 26% against the 35% of Pd-I and the 37% de Pd-P.
In the following subsection, an in-depth analysis is made using infrared spectroscopy studies of the effect of the presence of Pd on the changes in the reactivity of the P25.

3.3.1. Influence of the Presence of Water on the Catalyst Surface on the Oxidation Mechanism

Figure 8 shows the spectra obtained of the surface of the P25, P25-P and P25-I catalysts after the NO elimination studies. The spectra obtained with the P25-P and P25-I catalysts are practically the same, with bands centered at 1615, 1585, 1490, 1289 and 1250 cm−1. The P25-P spectrum additionally presents a shoulder over 1450 cm−1. The P25 spectrum presents a band at 1620 cm−1 with a shoulder at 1615 cm−1 and bands at 1585, 1423 and 1309 cm−1. These catalysts were left without illumination in an air atmosphere, and the progressive evolution of the bands observed initially was observed (Figure 8b–d). It could be seen in all cases that the initial bands progressively decreased at the same time as two new bands formed centered around 1416–1425 and 1330–1340 cm−1.
The bands that can be seen in the P25-P and P25-I at 1490 and 1289 cm−1 are attributed to nitro-chelates [34], while those observed at 1615, 1585 and 1250 cm−1 can be attributed to adsorbed NO2 [35,36]. The bands generated after concluding the test, centered around 1416–1425 and 1330–1340 cm−1, are attributed to solvated nitrates [37]. The analysis of these spectra suggests that, in the P25, after the NO elimination studies, the surface is saturated with solvated nitrates and, to a lesser extent, with nitro-chelates and adsorbed NO2. In contrast, in the catalysts with Pd, the surface is only saturated with nitro-chelates and adsorbed NO2.
The reaction of the NO with oxygen surface ions gives rise to nitrites (4), and the reaction of nitrites with oxygen surface ions gives rise to NO2 (5). Therefore, the nitrocompounds and the adsorbed NO2 observed in the FTIR studies (Figure 8) are generated from the reactions. Ruggeri et al. [38] described how the reaction between nitrites and NO2 to give nitrates, and NO constitutes an equilibrium (6). Hence, during the NO elimination studies in the catalysts with Pd, the reaction expressed in (6) does not take place until the catalysts are left in an air atmosphere, and the NO concentration decreases. However, in the case of the P25, the formation of nitrates is favored through another mechanism in which surface hydration of the catalyst is influential. This will be discussed below.
O b r     . ( a d s ) + N O ( a d s )    N O 2 ( a d s ) + Oxygen   Vacancy
N O 2 ( a d s ) + O b r ( a d s )   .      N O 2 ( a d s ) + O b r =
N O 2 ( a d s ) + N O 2 ( a d s )    N O 3 ( a d s ) + N O ( a d s )
The FTIR spectra of the catalysts after 15 h of NO elimination at 65% RH are shown in Figure 9a). Bands are mainly observed centered at 1416 and 1330 cm−1 attributed to solvated nitrates. These bands were more intense in the catalysts with Pd.
In the presence of humidity, the NO2 can be disproportionated through the following reaction:
2 N O 2 ( a d s ) + H 2 O ( a d s )    H O N O ( a d s ) + H N O 3 ( a d s )
It has been reported that the disproportionation of NO2 with water requires the formation of a prior isomer [39]. The formation of this isomer and the subsequent disproportionation of NO2 can be conditioned by the characteristics of the adsorbed water. Figure 9b shows the spectra of the catalysts and their spectra after subjecting them to a pure airflow at 65% RH. The P25 spectrum is represented by an intense band at 3400 cm−1 and another at 1620 cm−1 attributed to the stretching and bending modes of adsorbed water, respectively [40]. In contrast, in the catalysts with Pd, the spectrum is dominated by a broad band between 3600 and 2900 cm−1, another at 2134 cm−1 and a third at 1643 cm−1, which are typical of liquid water. That is, the adsorption of water in these catalysts seems to be less intense than in the P25. The intense interaction of water in the P25 appears to favor the disproportionation of NO2 through reaction (4).
These results are in agreement with those of previous studies made by our research team [41] in which it was found that the NO2 is not photocatalytically degraded but rather adsorbed and disproportionated on the surface of the TiO2.
In short, the absence of high surface hydration favors the formation of nitro-chelates and the adsorption of NO2 in the catalysts with Pd. This explains the greater eliminating capacity of this compound with the Pd-modified catalysts.

3.3.2. Influence of Palladium Oxidation State

The differences with respect to the Pd-I and Pd-P series of photocatalysts come from the amount of generated NO2. The increase of NO2 generated with humidity is greater for the Pd-I series. This means that, in 5 h, NOx removal is lower for Pd-I. Hence, in the absence of humidity, Pd-I and Pd-P function practically the same, but in the presence of humidity, the Pd-P series has greater photocatalytic efficiency. Although it was found for 65% RH that they have the same overall NOx removal capacity, the oxidation kinetics are faster for the Pd-P series (Figure 7c,e). Even though palladium deposition by photodeposition was less efficient (Table 2), the activity results of the P25-P series are better.
According to Sheng et al. [24], during irradiation, the formation of Pd4+ species takes place (8 and 9). The formation of these species is favored by the presence of humidity from the oxidation of Pd2+. The formation of these species and the consequences for the adsorption of NOx species may explain the changes in growth and decay in the NO2 profile that takes place in the first hour of irradiation for the catalysts of the Pd-I series, which are the catalysts which have a higher amount of oxidized palladium (Figure 6f).
P d 2 + + 2 H O a d s · P d 4 + + 2 O H
3 P d 2 + + 2 O 2 , a d s . + 4 H 2 O 3 P d 4 + + 8 O H
In order to clarify the results and the different evolution in the NOx oxidation kinetics in Pd-I and Pd-P, an XPS analysis was undertaken of the evolution of the Pd-I sample for different test times of 5 h and 24 h (Figure 10a).
No appreciable differences were observed in the Ti and O signals compared to the initial sample. Figure 10c,d shows the deconvoluted Pd signals at 5 h and 24 h. A shift can be observed of the doublets corresponding to the Pd with the test time to lower binding energies (from 336.4 to 335.5 eV and from 341.7 to 340.6 eV). This corresponds to the reduction from Pd2+ to Pd0. Figure 10b shows the initial deposit of Pd-I and after 24 h of radiation. A variation in color can be observed due to the majority appearance of Pd0 (grayish color). For Pd-I at 5 h, Pd presents a quite complex set of peaks, which indicates more species than Pd0 and PdO, which may be due to the Pd4+ (R5 and R6).
Table 4 shows removed NO, generated NO2 and removed NOx for various cycles of photoactivity with intermediate washes for Pd-I. Enhancement of the activity after each radiation cycle is confirmed as the Pd is reduced. In the second cycle, similar values to those of the Pd-P sample are obtained, and in the third cycle, the results are even bettered as the Pd-P sample also initially contained some oxidized Pd.
Activity was also tested with Vis radiation (Figure 7b,d,f). It can be seen that the incorporation of the metal improves P25 efficiency, especially for Pd-P with which more NOx is removed and less NO2 generated. Activity in the visible is attributable to the presence of Pd2+ and Pd0 on the surface of the modified photocatalysts. Under visible radiation, the presence of Pd0 gives rise to energy transitions between the TiO2 valence band and localized energy levels due to metal clusters [42,43]. In addition, the PdO band gap, presumably formed in Pd-I, is low, at 0.8 eV [44], which could act as a Vis-photosensitizer [45].

4. Conclusions

The presence of Pd on the TiO2 surface improves NOx removal. This improvement appears to be related to the presence of Pd, giving rise to a different interaction of the water with the TiO2 surface.
It is shown, as also indicated in previous studies, that NO2 is not photocatalytically degraded but rather is adsorbed and disproportionated on the TiO2 surface. In the present work, it was found that in the catalysts with Pd, the NO2- and NO2 generated from the photocatalytic oxidation of the NO in the absence of humidity are adsorbed on the surface of the catalyst, and there is no disproportionation to give nitrates until the NO is eliminated from the reaction medium. However, in the P25, there is some NO2 disproportionation due to the high surface hydration of the catalyst and less NO2 adsorption.
The photodeposition method produces a higher quantity of Pd0 than impregnation. It seems to be that the Pd0 form is beneficial for the activity of the catalyst under both ultraviolet and visible radiation.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization—M.J.H.R., E.P.M., J.M.D.R.; Data curation, Investigation, Writing—original draft—E.P.M., M.J.H.R. and J.A.; Formal analysis—M.J.H.R., E.P.M., J.M.D.R. and J.A.N.; Funding acquisition—J.M.D.R., O.M.G.D., J.A. and E.P.M.; Methodology—M.J.H.R., E.P.M., J.A. and D.E.S.; Supervision—E.P.M., J.M.D.R. and O.M.G.D.; Writing, review & editing—all authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.


Research was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness through the projects IPT-2012-0927-420000 (HORMIFOT) and CTQ2015-64664-C2-2-P (co-funded by FEDER EU).


M.J. Hernández thanks the University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria for its funding through their Research Support Programme.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


  1. Paz, Y. Application of TiO2 photocatalysis for air treatment: Patents’ overview. Appl. Catal. B 2010, 99, 448–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Roy, S.; Hegde, M.S.; Madras, G. Catalysis for NOx abatement. Appl. Energy 2009, 86, 2283–2297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lasek, J.; Yu, Y.H.; Wu, J.C.S. Removal of NOx by photocatalytic processes. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C 2013, 14, 29–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Skalska, K.; Miller, J.S.; Ledakowicz, S. Trends in NOx abatement: A review. Sciencie Total. Environ. 2010, 408, 3976–3989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Engel, A.; Große, J.; Dillert, R.; Bahnemann, D.W. The influence of irradiance and humidity on the photocatalytic conversion of nitrogen (II) oxide. J. Adv. Oxid. Technol. 2015, 18, 195–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Ballari, M.M.; Hunger, M.; Hüsken, G.; Brouwers, H.J.H. Modelling and experimental study of the NOx photocatalytic degradation employing concrete pavement with titanium dioxide. Catal. Today 2010, 151, 71–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ângelo, J.; Andrade, L.; Madeira, L.M.; Mendez, A. An overview of photocatalysis phenomena applied to NOx abatement. J. Environ. Manag. 2013, 129, 522–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Laufs, S.; Burgeth, G.; Duttlinger, W.; Kurtenbach, R.; Maban, M.; Thomas, C.; Wiesen, P.; Kleffmann, J. Conversion of nitrogen oxides on commercial photocatalytic dispersion paints. Atmos. Environ. 2010, 44, 2341–2349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pelaez, M.; Nolan, N.T.; Pillai, S.C.; Seery, M.K.; Falaras, P.; Kontos, A.G.; Dunlop, P.S.M.; Hamilton, J.W.J.; Byrne, J.A.; O’Shea, K. A review on the visible light active titanium dioxide photocatalysts for environmental applications. Appl. Catal. B 2012, 125, 331–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Sung-Suh, H.M.; Choi, J.R.; Hah, H.J.; Koo, S.M.; Bae, Y.C. Comparison of Ag deposition effects on the photocatalytic activity of nanoparticulate TiO2 under visible and UV light irradiation. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 2004, 163, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rothenberger, G.; Moser, J.; Graetzel, M.; Serpone, N.; Sharma, D.K. Charge carrier trapping and recombination dynamics in small semiconductor particles. J. Am. Chem. 1985, 107, 8054–8059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Maicu, M.; Hidalgo, M.C.; Colón, G.; Navío, J.A. Comparative study of the photodeposition of Pt, Au and Pd on pre-sulphated TiO2 for the photocatalytic decomposition of phenol. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 2011, 217, 275–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Papp, J.; Shen, H.S.; Kershaw, R.; Dwight, K.; Wold, A. Titanium(IV) oxide photocatalysts with palladium. Chem. Mater. 1993, 5, 284–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wu, Z.; Sheng, Z.; Wang, H.; Liu, Y. Relationship between Pd oxidation states on TiO2 and the photocatalytic oxidation behaviors of nitric oxide. Chemosphere 2009, 77, 264–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Lee, S.K.; Mills, A. Platinum and palladium in semiconductor photocatalytic systems. Platin. Metals Rev. 2003, 47, 61–72. [Google Scholar]
  16. Araña, J.; Doña-Rodríguez, J.M.; González Díaz, O.; Tello Rendón, E.; Herrera Melián, J.A.; Colón, G.; Navío, J.A.; Pérez Peña, J. Gas-phase ethanol photocatalytic degradation study with TiO2 doped with Fe, Pd and Cu. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2004, 215, 153–160. [Google Scholar]
  17. Sano, T.; Neigishi, N.; Uchino, K.; Tanaka, J.; Matsuzawa, S.; Takeuchi, K. Photocatalytic degradation of gaseous acetaldehyde on TiO2 with photodeposited metals and metal oxides. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 2003, 160, 93–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Su, I.H.; Jeffrey, J.C.S. Photo selective catalytic reduction of nitric oxide with propane at room temperature. Catal. Commun. 2009, 10, 1534–1537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yang, C.; Zhang, Q.; Li, J.; Gao, R.; Li, Z.; Huang, W. Catalytic activity and crystal structure modification of Pd/γ-Al2O3–TiO2 catalysts with different Al2O3 contents. J. Energy Chem. 2016, 25, 345–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Beck, A.; Horváth, A.; Schay, Z.; Stefler, G.Y.; Koppány, Z.S.; Sajó, I.; Geszti, O.; Guczi, L. Sol derived gold–palladium bimetallic nanoparticles on TiO2: Structure and catalytic activity in CO oxidation. Top. Catal. 2007, 44, 115–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fujiwara, K.; Müller, U.; Pratsinis, S.E. Pd Subnano-Clusters on TiO2 for Solar-Light Removal of NO. ACS Catal. 2016, 6, 1887–1893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Fujiwara, K.; Pratsinis, S.E. Atomically dispersed Pd on nanostructured TiO2 for NO removal by solar light. AIChE J. 2017, 63, 136–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wu, Z.; Sheng, Z.; Liu, Y.; Wang, H.; Tang, N.; Wang, J. Characterization and activity of Pd-modified TiO2 catalysts for photocatalytic oxidation of NO in gas phase. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 164, 542–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Sheng, Z.; Wu, Z.; Liu, Y.; Wang, H. Gas-phase photocatalytic oxidation of NO over palladium modified TiO2 catalysts. Catal. Commun. 2008, 9, 1941–1944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tandon, S.P.; Gupta, J.P. Measurement of Forbidden Energy Gap of Semiconductors by Diffuse Reflectance Technique. Physica 1970, 1, 363–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hernández Rodríguez, M.J.; Pulido Melián, E.; González Díaz, O.; Araña, J.; Macías, M.; González Orive, A.; Doña Rodríguez, J.M. Comparison of supported TiO2 catalysts in the photocatalytic degradation of NOx. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2016, 413, 56–66. [Google Scholar]
  27. Zhang, Z.; Mestl, G.; Knözinger, H.; Sachtler, W.M.H. Effects of calcination program and rehydration on palladium dispersion in zeolites. Appl. Catal. A 1992, 89, 155–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Pulido Melián, E.; López, C.R.; Ortega Méndez, A.; González Díaz, O.; Suárez, M.N.; Doña Rodríguez, J.M.; Navío, J.A.; Fernández Hevia, D. Hydrogen production using Pt-loaded TiO2 photocatalysts. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2013, 38, 11737–11748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ortega Méndez, J.A.; López, C.R.; Pulido Melián, E.; González Díaz, O.; Doña Rodríguez, J.M.; Fernández Hevia, D.; Macías, M. Production of hydrogen by water photo-splitting over commercial and synthesised Au/TiO2 catalysts. Appl. Catal. B 2014, 147, 439–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Aramendía, M.A.; Borau, V.; Colmenares, J.C.; Marinas, A.; Marinas, J.M.; Navío, J.A.; Urbano, F.J. Modification of the photocatalytic activity of Pd/TiO2 and Zn/TiO2 systems through different oxidative and reductive calcination treatments. Appl. Catal. B 2008, 80, 88–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hernández Rodríguez, M.J.; Pulido Melián, E.; García Santiago, D.; González Díaz, O.; Navío, J.A.; Doña Rodríguez, J.M. NO photooxidation with TiO2 photocatalysts modified with gold and platinum. Appl. Catal. B 2017, 205, 148–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Gniewek, A.; Trzeciak, A.M.; Ziółkowsk, J.J.; Kępiński, L.; Wrzyszcz, J.; Tylus, W. Pd-PVP colloid as catalyst for Heck and carbonylation reactions: TEM and XPS studies. J. Catal. 2005, 229, 332–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mills, A.; Elouali, S. The nitric oxide ISO photocatalytic reactor system: Measurement of NOx removal activity and capacity. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 2015, 305, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kantcheva, M. FT-IR spectroscopic investigation of the reactivity of NOx species adsorbed on Cu2+/ZrO2 and CuSO4/ZrO2 catalysts toward decane. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2003, 42, 89–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Long, S.R.Q.; Yang, R.T. Reaction mechanism of selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3 over Fe-ZSM-5 catalyst. J. Catal. 2002, 207, 224–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hixson, B.C.; Jordan, J.W.; Wagner, E.L.; Bevsek, H.M. Reaction products and kinetics of the reaction of NO2 with γ-Fe2O3. J. Phys. Chem. A 2011, 115, 13364–13369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Goebbert, D.J.; Garand, E.; Wende, T.; Bergamann, R.; Meijer, G.; Asmis, K.R.; Neurma, D.M. Infrared Spectroscopy of the Microhidated Nitrate Ions NO3-(H2O)1-6. J. Phys. Chem. A 2009, 113, 7584–7592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Ruggeri, P.; Selleri, T.; Colombo, M.; Nova, I.; Tronconi, E. Investigation of NO2 and NO interaction with an Fe-ZSM-5 catalyst by transient response methods and chemical trapping techniques. J. Catal. 2015, 328, 258–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lignell, H.; Varner, M.E.; Finlayson-Pitts, B.J.; Gerber, R.B. Isomerization and ionization of N2O4 on model ice and silica surfaces. Chem. Physics 2012, 405, 52–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Soria, J.; Sanz, J.; Sobrados, I.; Coronado, J.M.; Maira, A.J.; Herández-Alonso, M.D.; Fresno, F. FTIR and NMR Study of the Adsorbed Water on Nanocrystalline Anatase. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 10590–10596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Araña, J.; Garzón Sousa, D.; González Díaz, O.; Pulido Melián, E.; Doña Rodríguez, J.M. Effect of NO2 and NO3-/HNO3 adsorption on NO photocatalytic conversión. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2019, 244, 660–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lei, G.; Mingxia, X. Influences of the Pd doping on the visible light photocatalytic activities of InVO4–TiO2 thin films. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2006, 131, 222–229. [Google Scholar]
  43. Sakthivel, S.; Shankar, M.V.; Palanichamy, M.; Arabindoo, B.; Bahnemann, D.W.; Murugesan, V. Enhancement of photocatalytic activity by metal deposition: Characterisation and photonic efficiency of Pt, Au and Pd deposited on TiO2 catalyst. Water Res. 2014, 38, 3001–3008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Dare-Edwards, M.P.; Goodenough, J.B.; Hamnett, A. Evaluation of p-type PdO as a photocathode in water photoelectrolysis. Mater. Res. Bull 1984, 19, 435–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhou, W.; Guan, Y.; Wang, D.; Zhang, X.; Liu, D.; Jiang, H.; Wang, J.; Liu, X.; Liu, J.; Chen, S. PdO/TiO2 and Pd/TiO2 heterostructured nanobelts with enhanced photocatalytic activity. Chem. Asian J. 2014, 9, 1648–1654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Photocatalysts Pd-P (a) and Pd-I (b).
Figure 1. Photocatalysts Pd-P (a) and Pd-I (b).
Nanomaterials 10 02354 g001
Figure 2. (a) UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectra and (b) Pore volume distribution of the catalysts.
Figure 2. (a) UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectra and (b) Pore volume distribution of the catalysts.
Nanomaterials 10 02354 g002
Figure 3. TEM of Pd-modified P25: Pd-P (a) and Pd-I (b). The latter was obtained using high-angle annular dark-field imaging (HAADF).
Figure 3. TEM of Pd-modified P25: Pd-P (a) and Pd-I (b). The latter was obtained using high-angle annular dark-field imaging (HAADF).
Nanomaterials 10 02354 g003
Figure 4. XPS of Pd-modified samples: (a) Pd (3d) of Pd-P and (b) Pd (3d) of Pd-I.
Figure 4. XPS of Pd-modified samples: (a) Pd (3d) of Pd-P and (b) Pd (3d) of Pd-I.
Nanomaterials 10 02354 g004
Figure 5. Deposit of 1.16 mg·cm−2 of Pd-P (a) and Pd-I (b).
Figure 5. Deposit of 1.16 mg·cm−2 of Pd-P (a) and Pd-I (b).
Nanomaterials 10 02354 g005
Figure 6. Evolution of species for P25 0% RH (a), P25 65% RH (b), Pd-P 0% RH (c), Pd-P 65% RH (d), Pd-I 0% RH (e) and Pd-I 65% RH (f).
Figure 6. Evolution of species for P25 0% RH (a), P25 65% RH (b), Pd-P 0% RH (c), Pd-P 65% RH (d), Pd-I 0% RH (e) and Pd-I 65% RH (f).
Nanomaterials 10 02354 g006
Figure 7. Evolution of species (65% RH): P25 UV-vis (a), P25 Vis (b), Pd-P UV-vis (c), Pd-P Vis (d), Pd-I UV-vis (e) and Pd-I Vis (f).
Figure 7. Evolution of species (65% RH): P25 UV-vis (a), P25 Vis (b), Pd-P UV-vis (c), Pd-P Vis (d), Pd-I UV-vis (e) and Pd-I Vis (f).
Nanomaterials 10 02354 g007
Figure 8. Initial FTIR spectra (a) and spectra obtained after 24 h of reaction at 0% RH of the P25 (b), Pd-P (c) and Pd-I (d).
Figure 8. Initial FTIR spectra (a) and spectra obtained after 24 h of reaction at 0% RH of the P25 (b), Pd-P (c) and Pd-I (d).
Nanomaterials 10 02354 g008
Figure 9. (a) FTIR spectra obtained after 15 h of the reaction of NO elimination at 65% RH. (b) FTIR spectra of the catalysts (black) and the catalysts subjected to a pure airflow at 65% RH (red).
Figure 9. (a) FTIR spectra obtained after 15 h of the reaction of NO elimination at 65% RH. (b) FTIR spectra of the catalysts (black) and the catalysts subjected to a pure airflow at 65% RH (red).
Nanomaterials 10 02354 g009
Figure 10. XPS spectra corresponding to the 3d region of the Pd-I: comparison at different exposure times (a) and deconvolution at 5 h (c) and 24 h of illumination (d). Appearance of the coatings of initial Pd-I and Pd-I after 24 h (b).
Figure 10. XPS spectra corresponding to the 3d region of the Pd-I: comparison at different exposure times (a) and deconvolution at 5 h (c) and 24 h of illumination (d). Appearance of the coatings of initial Pd-I and Pd-I after 24 h (b).
Nanomaterials 10 02354 g010
Table 1. Main characteristics of the catalysts.
Table 1. Main characteristics of the catalysts.
Catalysts% AnataseCrystallite SizeSurface Area (m2∙g−1)Pore Volume (cm3·g−1)
Anatase (nm)Rutile (nm)
Table 2. XPS results of the Ti, O and Pd regions for the different modified photocatalysts.
Table 2. XPS results of the Ti, O and Pd regions for the different modified photocatalysts.
CatalystsBinding Energy/eV (Ti)% at. TiBinding Energy/eV (O)% at. OBinding Energy/eV Pd% at. Pd% wt. PdOlattice/Ti
Table 3. Percentages of NO removed, NO2 generated, and NOx removed for each of the tested photocatalyst samples for 5 h of UV-vis irradiation. RH stands for relative humidity.
Table 3. Percentages of NO removed, NO2 generated, and NOx removed for each of the tested photocatalyst samples for 5 h of UV-vis irradiation. RH stands for relative humidity.
NO Removed (%)NO2 Generated (%)NOx Removed (%) NO Removed (%)NO2 Generated (%)NOx Removed (%)
Pd-P 0% RH96.231.1795.06Pd-I 0% RH97.050.0097.05
Pd-P 25% RH95.043.6191.43Pd-I 25% RH95.0517.7777.28
Pd-P 40% RH89.6920.7468.95Pd-I 40% RH93.9038.4055.50
Pd-P 65% RH91.2721.1970.08Pd-I 65% RH95.0134.5460.47
P25 0% RH90.7316.2974.44P25 65% RH87.1646.5040.65
Table 4. Percentages of NO removed, NO2 generated, and NOx removed for 4 reuse cycles of Pd-I and 5 h of UV-vis irradiation.
Table 4. Percentages of NO removed, NO2 generated, and NOx removed for 4 reuse cycles of Pd-I and 5 h of UV-vis irradiation.
NO Removed (%)NO2 Generated (%)NOx Removed (%)
Cycle 195.0134.5460.47
Cycle 292.1820.5371.65
Cycle 392.339.1883.14
Cycle 494.168.1186.05
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hernández Rodríguez, M.J.; Pulido Melián, E.; Araña, J.; Navío, J.A.; González Díaz, O.M.; Santiago, D.E.; Doña Rodríguez, J.M. Influence of Water on the Oxidation of NO on Pd/TiO2 Photocatalysts. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 2354.

AMA Style

Hernández Rodríguez MJ, Pulido Melián E, Araña J, Navío JA, González Díaz OM, Santiago DE, Doña Rodríguez JM. Influence of Water on the Oxidation of NO on Pd/TiO2 Photocatalysts. Nanomaterials. 2020; 10(12):2354.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hernández Rodríguez, M. J., E. Pulido Melián, J. Araña, J. A. Navío, O. M. González Díaz, Dunia E. Santiago, and J. M. Doña Rodríguez. 2020. "Influence of Water on the Oxidation of NO on Pd/TiO2 Photocatalysts" Nanomaterials 10, no. 12: 2354.

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop