Next Article in Journal
A Facile Chemical Synthesis of PbTe Nanostructures at Room Temperature
Next Article in Special Issue
High Salinity and High Temperature Stable Colloidal Silica Nanoparticles with Wettability Alteration Ability for EOR Applications
Previous Article in Journal
The Recent Advances in the Mechanical Properties of Self-Standing Two-Dimensional MXene-Based Nanostructures: Deep Insights into the Supercapacitor
Previous Article in Special Issue
Parametric Study of Polymer-Nanoparticles-Assisted Injectivity Performance for Axisymmetric Two-Phase Flow in EOR Processes

Pore- and Core-Scale Insights of Nanoparticle-Stabilized Foam for CO2-Enhanced Oil Recovery

Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, 5007 Bergen, Norway
SINTEF Industry, 7034 Trondheim, Norway
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2020, 10(10), 1917;
Received: 4 September 2020 / Accepted: 17 September 2020 / Published: 25 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Application of Nanoparticles for Oil Recovery)
Nanoparticles have gained attention for increasing the stability of surfactant-based foams during CO2 foam-enhanced oil recovery (EOR) and CO2 storage. However, the behavior and displacement mechanisms of hybrid nanoparticle–surfactant foam formulations at reservoir conditions are not well understood. This work presents a pore- to core-scale characterization of hybrid nanoparticle–surfactant foaming solutions for CO2 EOR and the associated CO2 storage. The primary objective was to identify the dominant foam generation mechanisms and determine the role of nanoparticles for stabilizing CO2 foam and reducing CO2 mobility. In addition, we shed light on the influence of oil on foam generation and stability. We present pore- and core-scale experimental results, in the absence and presence of oil, comparing the hybrid foaming solution to foam stabilized by only surfactants or nanoparticles. Snap-off was identified as the primary foam generation mechanism in high-pressure micromodels with secondary foam generation by leave behind. During continuous CO2 injection, gas channels developed through the foam and the texture coarsened. In the absence of oil, including nanoparticles in the surfactant-laden foaming solutions did not result in a more stable foam or clearly affect the apparent viscosity of the foam. Foaming solutions containing only nanoparticles generated little to no foam, highlighting the dominance of surfactant as the main foam generator. In addition, foam generation and strength were not sensitive to nanoparticle concentration when used together with the selected surfactant. In experiments with oil at miscible conditions, foam was readily generated using all the tested foaming solutions. Core-scale foam-apparent viscosities with oil were nearly three times as high as experiments without oil present due to the development of stable oil/water emulsions and their combined effect with foam for reducing CO2 mobility View Full-Text
Keywords: nanoparticles; foam; CO2 EOR; CO2 mobility control nanoparticles; foam; CO2 EOR; CO2 mobility control
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Alcorn, Z.P.; Føyen, T.; Gauteplass, J.; Benali, B.; Soyke, A.; Fernø, M. Pore- and Core-Scale Insights of Nanoparticle-Stabilized Foam for CO2-Enhanced Oil Recovery. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1917.

AMA Style

Alcorn ZP, Føyen T, Gauteplass J, Benali B, Soyke A, Fernø M. Pore- and Core-Scale Insights of Nanoparticle-Stabilized Foam for CO2-Enhanced Oil Recovery. Nanomaterials. 2020; 10(10):1917.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alcorn, Zachary P., Tore Føyen, Jarand Gauteplass, Benyamine Benali, Aleksandra Soyke, and Martin Fernø. 2020. "Pore- and Core-Scale Insights of Nanoparticle-Stabilized Foam for CO2-Enhanced Oil Recovery" Nanomaterials 10, no. 10: 1917.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop