Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of the Biodistribution of Serinolamide-Derivatized C60 Fullerene
Previous Article in Journal
Characterisation of the PS-PMMA Interfaces in Microphase Separated Block Copolymer Thin Films by Analytical (S)TEM
Open AccessArticle

Intrinsic Control in Defects Density for Improved ZnO Nanorod-Based UV Sensor Performance

1
Intelligent Mechatronics Engineering/Smart Device Engineering, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Korea
2
Department of Chemistry, College of Science, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2455, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
3
Department of Energy and Materials Engineering, Dongguk University-Seoul, Seoul 04620, Korea
4
Environmental Welfare Research Center, Korea Institute of Science & Technology, Hwarangno 14 gil 5, Seongbuk–gu, Seoul 02792, Korea
5
Department of Electrical Engineering, National University of Sciences and Technology, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2020, 10(1), 142; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10010142
Received: 15 December 2019 / Revised: 9 January 2020 / Accepted: 9 January 2020 / Published: 13 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Nanophotonics, Characterization, Modelling, and Nanodevices)
Hitherto, most research has primarily focused on improving the UV sensor efficiency via surface treatments and by stimulating the ZnO nanorod (ZNR) surface Schottky barriers. However, to the best of our knowledge, no study has yet probed the intrinsic crystal defect generation and its effects on UV sensor efficiency. In this study, we undertake this task by fabricating an intrinsic defect-prone hydrothermally grown ZNRs (S1), Ga-doped ZNRs (S2), and defect-free microwave-assisted grown ZNRs (S3). The defect states were recognized by studying X-ray diffraction and photoluminescence characteristics. The large number of crystal defects in S1 and S2 had two pronged disadvantages. (1) Most of the UV light was absorbed by the defect traps and the e–h pair generation was compromised. (2) Mobility was directly affected by the carrier–carrier scattering and phonon scattering processes. Hence, the overall UV sensor efficiency was compromised based on the defect-induced mobility-response model. Considering the facts, defect-free S3 exhibited the best UV sensor performance with the highest on/off ratio, the least impulse response time, the highest recombination time, and highest gain-induced responsivity to 368 nm UV light, which was desired of an efficient passive metal oxide-based UV sensor. Our results were compared with the recently published results. View Full-Text
Keywords: ZnO nanorods; doping; UV sensor; defects; mobility; responsivity; nanomaterials ZnO nanorods; doping; UV sensor; defects; mobility; responsivity; nanomaterials
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

MDPI and ACS Style

Rana, A.H.S.; Shaikh, S.F.; Al-Enizi, A.M.; Agyeman, D.A.; Ghani, F.; Nah, I.W.; Shahid, A. Intrinsic Control in Defects Density for Improved ZnO Nanorod-Based UV Sensor Performance. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 142.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop