Next Article in Journal
How to Think Rationally about World Problems
Next Article in Special Issue
The Great Debate: General Ability and Specific Abilities in the Prediction of Important Outcomes
Previous Article in Journal
Individual Mental Abiities vs. the World’s Problems
Article

A Tempest in A Ladle: The Debate about the Roles of General and Specific Abilities in Predicting Important Outcomes

Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, 7 George Square, Edinburgh EH8 9JZ, UK
Received: 28 February 2018 / Revised: 28 March 2018 / Accepted: 12 April 2018 / Published: 19 April 2018
The debate about the roles of general and specific abilities in predicting important outcomes is a tempest in a ladle because we cannot measure abilities without also measuring skills. Skills always develop through exposure, are specific rather than general, and are executed using different strategies by different people, thus tapping into varied specific abilities. Relative predictive validities of measurement formats depend on the purpose: the more general and long-term the purpose, the better the more general measure. The more specific and immediate the purpose, the better the closely related specific measure. View Full-Text
Keywords: general cognitive ability; specific cognitive abilities; academic achievement; job performance; occupational attainment; health; longevity; situational specificity general cognitive ability; specific cognitive abilities; academic achievement; job performance; occupational attainment; health; longevity; situational specificity
MDPI and ACS Style

Johnson, W. A Tempest in A Ladle: The Debate about the Roles of General and Specific Abilities in Predicting Important Outcomes. J. Intell. 2018, 6, 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence6020024

AMA Style

Johnson W. A Tempest in A Ladle: The Debate about the Roles of General and Specific Abilities in Predicting Important Outcomes. Journal of Intelligence. 2018; 6(2):24. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence6020024

Chicago/Turabian Style

Johnson, Wendy. 2018. "A Tempest in A Ladle: The Debate about the Roles of General and Specific Abilities in Predicting Important Outcomes" Journal of Intelligence 6, no. 2: 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence6020024

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop