Can Intelligence Testing Inform Educational Intervention for Children with Reading Disability?
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. The Resilience of Discrepancy Testing
- The discrepancy mode has been dominant for so long [28] that it is has become steeped in everyday understandings that are difficult to break;
- Some researchers argue that dyslexia should be unexpected on the basis of functioning in other areas (e.g., [29]). Such a judgement would naturally spring from an IQ discrepancy;
- Research studies of reading disability often select participants whose IQ scores are within the average range or above. For some, the primary reason for this is that avoiding the inclusion of those with particular cognitive difficulties may help be helpful when identifying underlying cognitive mechanisms associated with reading difficulties [30];
- Some argue that despite the flaws involved, these are still preferable to existing alternatives. Thus, Elbeheri and Everatt (2009) [31] argue that other indicators are still not sufficiently robust and until these “…are fully explored and reliably measured, the arguments for using IQ tests as a basis of indication will be difficult to refute” (p. 30);
- In many countries, IQ test scores are key in determining eligibility for additional education services;
- IQ tests are restricted to appropriately qualified professionals, are iconic images of psychological practice, and, for many, are an important means of reserving and maintaining professional influence and status. As one psychologist states, “...the intelligence test is our stethoscope, like it or not” ([34], p. 54).
- Many poor readers are understandably concerned to ensure that their reading difficulties are not perceived by others as indicative of low intelligence. The hurt and humiliation that are often experienced by struggling readers, as a result of the perceptions and misunderstandings of others [35] are such that a diagnostic label that not only decouples intelligence and reading ability, but is also suggestive of higher-level intellectual functioning, will be highly attractive.
- 9.
- Assessments of dyslexia/reading disability are often conducted by those whose experience involves the use of testing rather than involvement in approaches to tackling severe reading disability. As noted below, the debate has moved away from IQ to cognitive profiling in recent years.
- (a)
- whether the individual should be diagnosed in some way (e.g., as learning disabled, having a specific learning disability, or as dyslexic) which differentiates them from others with more global difficulties (often referred to as “slow learners”). The use of such terms varies from one country to another;
- (b)
- how the individual is likely to respond when given extra assistance;
- (c)
- the ways by which the individual’s cognitive profile can be employed to inform closely related interventions.
3. IQ versus Executive Functioning
4. Predicting Academic Progress
“One of the major purposes of a comprehensive assessment is to derive hypotheses emerging from a student’s cognitive profile that would allow the derivation of different and more effective instruction. By eliminating an evaluation of cognitive abilities and psychological processes, we revert to a one-size-fits-all mentality where it is naively assumed that all children fail for the same reason…At the current stage of scientific knowledge, it is only through a comprehensive evaluation of a student’s cognitive and psychological abilities that we can gain insights into the underlying proximal and varied root causes of reading difficulties and then provide specific interventions that are targeted to each student’s individual needs”.(pp. 46–47)
Despite claims on the contrary (Hale et al., 2008) [37] there is little evidence of Aptitude x Treatment interactions for cognitive/neuropsychological skills at the level of treatment or aptitude ([83], pp. 28–29). The strongest evidence of Aptitude x Treatment interactions is when strengths and weaknesses in academic skills are used to provide differential instruction [84].
“…shift the focus of their clinical activities away from emphasis on psychometric assessment to detect cognitive and biological causes of a child’s reading difficulties for purposes of categorical labelling in favor of assessment that would eventuate in educational and remedial activities tailored to the child’s individual needs”.(p. 31)
5. Dynamic Approaches to Cognitive Testing
- improvements in strategy (into advanced solving procedures such as reasoning, seriation) over time as a consequence of instruction;
- the use of different processes: analytical versus heuristic versus trial-and-error;
- individual differences in progression; some need a lot of help but still make limited improvement; some improve a lot with the same amount of help; some perform well from the outset;
- differences in the individual’s response to various forms of assistance: metacognitive prompts; cognitive prompts, modeling;
- changes in these instructional needs as a result of training gains;
- differences in the time required to plan and to solve the task;
- the way in which such differences emerge;
- variability or constancy in the use of strategies used to solve problems;
- differences in the ways children articulate the processes they have used to help them solve problems;
- changes in the order of groups of children (seen as a measure of potential), based upon scores obtained during the assessment period;
- differences in the child’s capacity to transfer learning to new problems.
6. Conclusions and Recommendations
Author Contributions
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Lyon, G.R. Learning disabilities. Future Child. 1996, 6, 54–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cotton, S.M.; Crewther, D.P.; Crewther, S.G. Measurement error: Implications for diagnosis and discrepancy models of developmental dyslexia. Dyslexia 2005, 11, 186–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fletcher, J.M.; Lyon, G.R.; Fuchs, L.S.; Barnes, M.A. Learning Disabilities; Guilford: New York, NY, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Tanaka, H.; Black, J.M.; Hulme, C.; Stanley, L.M.; Kesler, S.R.; Whitfield-Gabrieli, S.; Reiss, A.L.; Gabrieli, J.D.; Hoeft, F. The brain basis of the phonological deficit in dyslexia is independent of IQ. Psychol. Sci. 2011, 22, 1442–1451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hoskyn, M.; Swanson, H.L. Cognitive processing of low achievers and children with reading disabilities: A selective meta-analytic review of the published literature. Sch. Psychol. Rev. 2000, 29, 102–119. [Google Scholar]
- Stuebing, K.K.; Fletcher, J.M.; LeDoux, J.M.; Lyon, R.G.; Shaywitz, S.E.; Shaywitz, B.A. Validity of IQ-discrepancy classifications of reading disabilities: A meta-analysis. Am. Educ. Res. J. 2002, 39, 469–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stuebing, K.K.; Barth, A.E.; Molfese, P.J.; Weiss, B.; Fletcher, J.M. IQ is not strongly related to response to reading instruction: A meta-analytic interpretation. Except. Child. 2009, 76, 31–51. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Francis, D.J.; Shaywitz, S.E.; Stuebing, K.K.; Shaywitz, B.A.; Fletcher, J.M. Developmental lag versus deficit models of reading disability: A longitudinal individual growth curves analysis. J. Educ. Psychol. 1996, 88, 3–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flowers, L.; Meyer, M.; Lovato, J.; Wood, F.; Felton, R. Does third grade discrepancy status predict the course of reading development? Ann. Dyslexia 2001, 51, 49–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gresham, F.M.; Vellutino, F.R. What is the role of intelligence in the identification of specific learning disabilities? Issues and clarifications. Learn. Disabil. Res. Pract. 2010, 25, 194–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Watkins, M.W.; Kush, J.C.; Glutting, J.J. Discriminant and predictive validity of the WISC-III ACID profile among children with learning disabilities. Psychol. Sch. 1997, 34, 309–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vargo, F.E.; Grossner, G.S.; Spafford, C.S. Digit span and other WISC-R scores in the diagnosis of dyslexic children. Percept. Mot. Skills 1995, 80, 1219–1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kaufman, A.S. Intelligent Testing with the WISC-III; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
- Prifitera, A.; Dersch, J. Base rates of WISC-III diagnostic subtest patterns among normal, learning disabled and ADHD samples. J. Psychoeduc. Assess. 1993, 1993, 43–55. [Google Scholar]
- Ward, S.B.; Ward, T.J.; Hatt, C.V.; Young, D.L.; Molner, N.R. The incidence and utility of the ACID, ACIDS and SCAD profiles in a referred population. Psychol. Sch. 1995, 32, 267–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Watkins, M.W. Cognitive profile analysis: A shared professional myth. Sch. Psychol. Q. 2000, 15, 465–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- British Psychological Society. Dyslexia, Literacy and Psychological Assessment: Report by a Working Party of the Division of Educational and Child Psychology of the British Psychological Society; British Psychological Society: Leicester, UK, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Frederickson, N. The ACID test—Or is it? Educ. Psychol. Pract. 1999, 15, 2–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Canivez, G.L. Psychometric versus actuarial interpretation of intelligence and related aptitude batteries. In Oxford Handbook of Psychological Assessment of Children and Adolescents; Saklofske, D.H., Schwean, V.L., Eds.; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2013; pp. 84–112. [Google Scholar]
- Kortteinen, H.; Närhi, V.; Ahonen, T. Does IQ matter in adolescents’ reading disability? Learn. Individ. Differ. 2009, 19, 257–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiménez, J.E.; Garcia de la Cadena, C. Learning disabilities in Guatemala and Spain: A cross-national study of the prevalence and cognitive processes associated with reading and spelling disabilities. Learn. Disabil. Res. Pract. 2007, 22, 161–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stanovich, K.E. The future of a mistake: Will discrepancy measurement continue to make the learning disabilities field a pseudoscience? Learn. Disabil. Q. 2005, 28, 103–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Machek, G.R.; Nelson, J.M. How should reading disabilities be operationalized? A survey of practicing school psychologists. Learn. Disabil. Res. Pract. 2007, 22, 147–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- O’Donnell, P.S.; Miller, D.N. Identifying students with specific learning disabilities: School psychologists’ acceptability of the discrepancy model versus response to intervention. J. Disabil. Policy Stud. 2011, 22, 83–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Warnke, A.; Schulte-Körne, G.; Ise, E. Developmental dyslexia. In Brain, Mind, and Developmental Psychopathology in Childhood; Garralda, M.E., Raynaud, J., Eds.; Jason Aronson Publishing: Lanham, MD, USA, 2012; pp. 173–198. [Google Scholar]
- Ramus, F. Should there really be a dyslexia debate? Brain 2014, 137, 3371–3374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elliott, J.G.; Grigorenko, E.G. The Dyslexia Debate; Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Catts, H.W.; Kamhi, A. Language and Reading Disabilities; Allyn and Bacon: Boston, MA, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Nicolson, R.I.; Fawcett, A.J. Procedural learning difficulties: Reuniting the developmental disorders? Trends Neurosci. 2007, 30, 135–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Snowling, M.J. Specific disorders and broader phenotypes: The case of dyslexia. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 2008, 61, 142–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Elbeheri, G.; Everatt, J. Dyslexia and IQ: From research to practice. In the Routledge Companion to Dyslexia; Reid, G., Ed.; Routledge: London, UK, 2009; pp. 22–32. [Google Scholar]
- Christopher, M.E.; Miyake, A.; Keenan, J.M.; Pennington, B.; DeFries, J.C.; Wadsworth, S.J.; Willcutt, E.; Olson, R.K. Predicting word reading and comprehension with executive function and speed measures across development: A latent variable analysis. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 2012, 141, 470–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vellutino, F.R.; Fletcher, J.M.; Snowling, M.J.; Scanlon, D.M. Specific reading disability (dyslexia): What have we learned in the past four decades? J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 2004, 45, 2–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kersting, K. Debating learning-disability identification. Psychology 2004, 35, 54–55. [Google Scholar]
- Callens, M.; Tops, W.; Brysbaert, M. Cognitive profile of students who enter higher education with an indication of dyslexia. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e38081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Decker, S.L.; Hale, J.B.; Flanagan, D.P. Professional practice issues in the assessment of cognitive functioning for educational applications. Psychol. Sch. 2013, 50, 300–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hale, J.B.; Fiorello, C.A.; Miller, J.A.; Wenrich, K.; Teodori, A.M.; Henzel, J. WISC-IV assessment and intervention strategies for children with specific learning difficulties. In WISC-IV Clinical Assessment and Intervention; Prifitera, A., Saklofske, D.H., Weiss, L.G., Eds.; Elsevier: New York, NY, USA, 2008; pp. 109–171. [Google Scholar]
- Hale, J.B.; Fiorello, C.A. School Neuropsychology: A Practitioner’s Handbook; Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Flanagan, D.P.; Ortiz, S.O.; Alfonso, V.C. Essentials of Cross-Battery Assessment, 2nd ed.; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Naglieri, J.A. Essentials of CAS Assessment; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Hale, J.B.; Alfonso, V.; Berninger, V.; Bracken, B.; Christo, C.; Clark, E.; Cohen, M.; Davis, A.; Decker, S.; Denckla, M.; et al. Critical issues in response to intervention, comprehensive evaluation, and specific learning disabilities evaluation and intervention: An expert white paper consensus. Learn. Disabil. Q. 2010, 33, 223–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miciak, J.; Fletcher, J.M.; Stuebing, K.K. Accuracy and validity of methods for identifying learning disabilities in a response-to-intervention service delivery framework. In Handbook of Response to Intervention: The Science and Practice of Multi-Tiered Systems of Support, 2nd ed.; Jimerson, S.R., Burns, M.K., VanDerHeyden, A.M., Eds.; Springer Science: New York, NY, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Kramer, J.J.; Henning-Stout, M.; Ullman, D.P.; Schellenberg, R.P. The viability of scatter analysis on the WISC-R and the SBIS: Examining a vestige. J. Psychoeduc. Assess. 1987, 5, 37–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stuebing, K.K.; Fletcher, J.M.; Branum-Martin, L.; Francis, D.J. Evaluation of the technical adequacy of three methods for identifying specific learning disabilities based on cognitive discrepancies. Sch. Psychol. Rev. 2012, 41, 3–22. [Google Scholar]
- Miciak, J.; Fletcher, J.M.; Stuebing, K.K.; Vaughn, S.; Tolar, T.D. Patterns of cognitive strengths and weaknesses: Identification rates, agreement, and validity for learning disabilities identification. Sch. Psychol. Q. 2014, 29, 21–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Miciak, J.; Taylor, W.P.; Denton, C.A.; Fletcher, J.M. The effect of achievement test selection on identification of learning disabilities within a patterns of strengths and weaknesses framework. Sch. Psychol. Q. 2015, 30, 321–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bradley, R.; Danielson, L.; Hallahan, D.P. (Eds.) Identification of Learning Disabilities: Research to Practice; Erlbaum: Mahwah, NJ, USA, 2002.
- Miciak, J.; Williams, J.L.; Taylor, W.P.; Cirino, P.T.; Fletcher, J.M.; Vaughn, S. Do processing patterns of strengths and weaknesses predict differential treatment response? J. Educ. Psychol. 2015, in press. [Google Scholar]
- Fletcher, J.M.; Stuebing, K.K.; Morris, R.D.; Lyon, G.R. Classification and definition of learning disabilities: A hybrid model. In Handbook of Learning Disabilities, 2nd ed.; Swanson, H.L., Harris, K.R., Graham, S., Eds.; Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA, 2013; pp. 33–50. [Google Scholar]
- Fletcher, J.M.; Morris, R.D.; Lyon, G.R. Classification and definition of learning disabilities: An integrative perspective. In Handbook of Learning Disabilities; Swanson, H.L., Harris, K.R., Graham, S., Eds.; Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA, 2003; pp. 30–56. [Google Scholar]
- Sasser, T.R.; Bierman, K.L.; Heinrichs, B. Executive functioning and school adjustment: The mediational role of pre-kindergarten learning-related behaviors. Early Child. Res. Q. 2015, 30, 70–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diamond, A. Executive functions. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2013, 64, 135–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jacob, R.; Parkinson, J. The potential for school-based interventions that target executive function to improve academic achievement: A review. Rev. Educ. Res. 2015, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bull, R.; Scerif, G. Executive functioning as a predictor of children’s mathematics ability: Inhibition, switching and working memory. Dev. Neuropsychol. 2001, 19, 273–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Borella, E.; Carretti, B.; Pelgrina, S. The specific role of inhibition in reading comprehension in good and poor comprehenders. J. Learn. Disabil. 2010, 43, 541–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Duncan, G.J.; Dowsett, C.J.; Claessens, A.; Magnuson, K.; Huston, A.C.; Klebanov, P.; Pagani, L.S.; Feinstein, L.; Engel, M.; Brooks-Gunn, J.; et al. School readiness and later achievement. Dev. Psychol. 2007, 43, 1428–1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nayfield, I.; Fuccillo, J.; Greenfield, D.B. Executive functions in early learning: Extending the relationship between executive functions and school readiness to science. Learn. Individ. Differ. 2013, 26, 81–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thompson, P.A.; Hulme, C.; Nash, H.M.; Gooch, D.; Hayiou-Thomas, E.; Snowling, M.J. Developmental dyslexia: Predicting individual risk. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 2015, 56, 976–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wass, S. Applying cognitive training to target executive functions during early development. Child Neuropsychol. 2015, 21, 150–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Diamond, A. Activities and programs that improve children’s executive functions. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 2012, 21, 335–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Redick, T.S.; Shipstead, Z.; Wiemmers, E.A.; Melby-Lervåg, M.; Hulme, C. What’s working in working memory training? An educational perspective. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Holmes, J.; Gathercole, S.E.; Dunning, D.L. Adaptive training leads to sustained enhancement of poor working memory in children. Dev. Sci. 2009, 12, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dunning, D.L.; Holmes, J.; Gathercole, S.E. Does working memory training lead to generalized improvements in children with low working memory? A randomized controlled trial. Dev. Sci. 2013, 16, 915–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kirk, H.E.; Gray, K.; Riby, D.M.; Cornish, K.M. Cognitive training as a resolution for early executive function difficulties in children with intellectual disabilities. Res. Dev. Disabil. 2015, 38, 145–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Redick, T.S. Working memory training and interpreting interactions in intelligence interventions. Intelligence 2015, 50, 14–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Estrada, E.; Ferrer, E.; Abad, F.J.; Román, F.J.; Colom, R. A general factor of intelligence fails to account for changes in tests’ scores after cognitive practice: A longitudinal multi-group latent-variable study. Intelligence 2015, 50, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hayes, T.R.; Petrov, A.A.; Sederberg, P.B. Do we really become smarter when our fluid-intelligence test scores improve? Intelligence 2015, 48, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Melby-Lervåg, M.; Hulme, C. Is working memory training effective? A meta-analytic review. Dev. Psychol. 2013, 49, 270–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Banales, E.; Kohnen, S.; McArthur, G. Can verbal working memory training improve reading? Cogn. Neuropsychol. 2015, 32, 104–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Elliott, J.G.; Gathercole, S.E.; Alloway, T.P.; Kirkwood, H.; Holmes, J. An evaluation of a classroom-based intervention to help overcome working memory difficulties. J. Cogn. Educ. Psychol. 2010, 9, 227–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rabiner, D.L.; Murray, D.W.; Skinner, A.T.; Malone, P.S. A randomized trial of two promising computer-based interventions for students with attention difficulties. J. Abnorm. Child Psychol. 2010, 38, 131–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fletcher, J.M.; Stuebing, K.K.; Barth, A.E.; Denton, C.A.; Cirino, P.T.; Francis, D.J.; Vaughn, S. Cognitive correlates of inadequate response to reading intervention. Sch. Psychol. Rev. 2011, 40, 3–22. [Google Scholar]
- Stuebing, K.K.; Barth, A.E.; Trahan, L.H.; Reddy, R.R.; Miciak, J.; Fletcher, J.M. Are child cognitive characteristics strong predictors of responses to intervention? A meta-analysis. Rev. Educ. Res. 2015, 85, 395–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Oslund, E.L.; Simmons, D.C.; Hagan-Burke, S.; Kwok, O.M.; Simmons, L.E.; Taylor, A.B.; Coyne, M.D. Can curriculum-embedded measures predict the later reading achievement of kindergarteners at risk of reading disability? Learn. Disabil. Q. 2015, 38, 3–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fuchs, D.; Compton, D.L.; Fuchs, L.S.; Bryant, J.; Hamlett, C.L.; Lambert, W. First-grade cognitive abilities as long-term predictors of reading comprehension and disability status. J. Learn. Disabil. 2012, 45, 217–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Reynolds, C.R.; Shaywitz, S.E. Response to intervention: Prevention and remediation, perhaps. Diagnosis, No. Child Dev. Perspect. 2009, 3, 44–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gresham, F.M. Using response to intervention for identification of specific learning disabilities. In Behavioral Interventions in Schools: Evidence-Based Positive Strategies; Akin-Little, A., Little, S.G., Bray, M.A., Kehl, T.J., Eds.; American Psychological Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2009; pp. 205–220. [Google Scholar]
- Fletcher, J.M.; Vaughn, S. Response to intervention: Preventing and remediating academic difficulties. Child Dev. Perspect. 2009, 3, 30–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cronbach, L.J. Beyond the two disciplines of scientific psychology. Am. Psychol. 1975, 30, 116–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pashler, H.; McDaniel, M.; Rohrer, D.; Bjork, R. Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychol. Sci. Public Interest 2008, 9, 106–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Compton, D.L.; Fuchs, L.S.; Fuchs, D.; Lambert, W.; Hamlett, C. The cognitive and academic profiles of reading and mathematics learning disabilities. J. Learn. Disabil. 2012, 45, 79–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fletcher, J.M. Dyslexia: The evolution of a scientific concept. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 2009, 15, 501–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Reschly, D.J.; Tilley, W.D. Reform trends and system design alternatives. In Special Education in Transition: Functional Assessment and Noncategorical Programming; Reschly, D.J., Tilley, W.D., Grimes, J.P., Eds.; Sopris West: Longmont, CO, USA, 1999; pp. 19–48. [Google Scholar]
- Connor, C.M.; Morrison, F.J.; Fishman, B.J.; Schatschneider, C.; Underwood, P. Algorithm-guided individualized reading instruction. Science 2007, 315, 464–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kearns, D.; Fuchs, D. Does cognitively focused instruction improve the academic performance of low-achieving students? Except. Child. 2013, 79, 263–290. [Google Scholar]
- Connor, C.M. Child characteristics-instruction interactions: Implications for students’ literacy skills development in the early grades. In Handbook on Early Literacy, 3rd ed.; Neuman, S.B., Dickinson, D.K., Eds.; Guilford: New York, NY, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Galuschka, K.; Ise, E.; Krick, K.; Schulte-Körne, G. Effectiveness of treatment approaches for children and adolescents with reading disabilities: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e89900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Elliott, J.G.; Grigorenko, E.G.; Resing, W.C.M. Dynamic Assessment: The need for a dynamic approach. In International Encyclopedia of Education; Peterson, P., Baker, E., McGaw, B., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2010; Volume 3, pp. 220–225. [Google Scholar]
- Wagner, R.; Sternberg, R.J. Alternative conceptions of intelligence and their implications for education. Rev. Educ. Res. 1984, 54, 179–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reschly, D. Diagnostic and treatment utility of intelligence tests. In Contemporary Intellectual Assessment: Theories, Tests and Issues; Flanagan, D.P., Genshaft, J.L., Harrison, P.L., Eds.; Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Fuchs, D.; Fuchs, L.S.; Benowitz, S.; Barringer, K. Norm-referenced tests: Are they valid for use with handicapped students? Except. Child. 1987, 54, 263–271. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Hessels, M.G.P. The Learning potential test for Ethnic Minorities: A tool for standardized assessment of children in kindergarten and the first years of primary school. In Dynamic Assessment: Prevailing Models and Applications; Lidz, C.S., Elliott, J.G., Eds.; Elsevier: New York, NY, USA, 2000; pp. 109–131. [Google Scholar]
- Tzuriel, D.; Kaufman, R. Mediated Learning and Cognitive Modifiability Dynamic Assessment of Young Ethiopian Immigrant Children to Israel. J. Cross Cult. Psychol. 1999, 30, 359–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carlson, J.S. (Ed.) applications. In Advances in Cognition and Educational Practice; Carlson, J.S. (Ed.) Elsevier: New York, NY, USA, 2000; Volume 6.
- Grigorenko, E.L. Dynamic assessment and response to intervention: Two sides of one coin. J. Learn. Disabil. 2009, 42, 111–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Haywood, H.C.; Lidz, C.S. Dynamic Assessment in Practice: Clinical and Educational Applications; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Robinson-Zanartu, C.; Carlson, J. Dynamic assessment, Volume 3. Testing and assessment in school psychology and education. In APA Handbook of Testing and Assessment in Psychology; Geisinger, K.F., Bracken, B.A., Carlson, J.F., Hansen, J.I.C., Kuncel, N.R., Reise, S.P., Rodriquez, M.C., Eds.; American Psychological Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2013; pp. 149–167. [Google Scholar]
- Sternberg, R.J.; Grigorenko, E.L. Dynamic Testing: The Nature and Measurement of Learning Potential; Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Tzuriel, D. Dynamic assessment of learning potential. In Self-Directed Learning Oriented Assessments in the Asia-Pacific; Springer: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2013; pp. 235–255. [Google Scholar]
- Vygotsky, L.S. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. In Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes; Cole, M., John-Steiner, V., Scribner, S., Souberman, E., Eds.; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1978; pp. 17–119. [Google Scholar]
- Vygotsky, L.S. Thought and Language; Hanfmann, E.; Vakar, G., Translators; The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1962. [Google Scholar]
- Resing, W. Dynamic Testing and Individualized Instruction: Helpful in Cognitive Education? J. Cogn. Educ. Psychol. 2013, 12, 81–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feuerstein, R.; Rand, Y.; Hoffman, M.B. The Dynamic Assessment of Retarded Performers: The Learning Potential Assessment Device, Theory, Instruments, and Techniques; University Park Press: Baltimore, MD, USA, 1979. [Google Scholar]
- Büchel, F.P.; Scharnhorst, U. The Learning Potential Assessment Device (LPAD): Discussion of theoretical and methodological problems. In Learning Potential Assessment; Hamers, J.M.H., Sijtsma, K., Ruissenaars, A.J.M., Eds.; Swets & Zeitlinger: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- Lidz, C.S. Leaning toward a consensus about dynamic assessment: Can we? Do we want to? J. Cogn. Educ. Psychol. 2014, 13, 292–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tzuriel, D. Dynamic Assessment of Young Children; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Budoff, M.; Friedman, M. “Learning potential” as an assessment approach to the adolescent mentally retarded. J. Consult. Psychol. 1964, 28, 434–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Guthke, J. Zur Diagnostik der intellektuellen Lernfähigkeit; VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften: Berlin, Germany, 1972; Volume 1. (In German) [Google Scholar]
- Guthke, J.; Beckman, J.F. The learning test concept and its application in practice. In Dynamic Assessment: Prevailing Models and Applications; Series: Advances in cognition and educational practice; Lidz, C.S., Elliott, J., Eds.; Elsevier: New York, NY, USA, 2000; Volume 6, pp. 17–69. [Google Scholar]
- Swanson, H.L. Swanson-Cognitive Processing Test: Review and applications. In Dynamic Assessment: Prevailing Models and Applications; Lidz, C.S., Elliott, J.G., Eds.; Elsevier: New York, NY, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Campione, J.C.; Brown, A.L. Linking dynamic assessment with school achievement. In Dynamic Assessment: An Interactional Approach to Evaluating Learning Potential; Lidz, C.S., Ed.; Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA, 1987; pp. 82–109. [Google Scholar]
- Ferrara, R.A.; Brown, A.L.; Campione, J.C. Children’s learning and transfer of inductive reasoning rules: Studies of proximal development. Child Dev. 1986, 57, 1087–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Grigorenko, E.L.; Sternberg, R.J. Dynamic testing. Psychol. Bull. 1998, 124, 75–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caffrey, E.; Fuchs, D.; Fuchs, L.S. The predictive validity of dynamic assessment. J. Spec. Educ. 2008, 41, 254–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bosma, T.; Resing, W.C.M. Need for instruction: Dynamic testing in special education. Eur. J. Spec. Needs Educ. 2012, 27, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burns, M.S.; Vye, N.J.; Bransford, J.D.; Delclos, V.; Ogan, T. Static and dynamic measures of learning in young handicapped children. Assess. Eff. Interv. 1987, 12, 59–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hasson, N.; Joffe, V. The case for dynamic assessment in speech and language therapy. Child Lang. Teach. Ther. 2007, 23, 9–25. [Google Scholar]
- Resing, W.C.M.; Elliott, J.G. Dynamic testing with tangible electronics: Measuring children’s change in strategy use with a series completion task. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 2011, 81, 579–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Resing, W.C.M.; Xenidou-Dervou, I.; Steijn, W.M.P.; Elliott, J.G. A “picture” of children’s potential for learning: Looking into strategy changes and working memory by dynamic testing. Learn. Individ. Differ. 2012, 22, 144–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sternberg, R.J.; Grigorenko, E.L. All testing is dynamic testing. Issues Educ. 2001, 7, 137–170. [Google Scholar]
- Beckmann, J.F. The umbrella that is too wide and yet too small: Why dynamic testing has still not delivered on the promise that was never made. J. Cogn. Educ. Psychol. 2014, 13, 308–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Elliott, J.G. Dynamic assessment in educational settings: Realising potential. Educ. Rev. 2003, 55, 15–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beckmann, J.F. Superiority: Always and everywhere? On some misconceptions in the validation of dynamic testing. Educ. Child Psychol. 2006, 23, 35–49. [Google Scholar]
- Stevenson, C.E.; Bergwerff, C.E.; Heiser, W.J.; Resing, W. Working memory and dynamic measures of analogical reasoning as predictors of children’s math and reading achievement. Infant Child Dev. 2014, 23, 51–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bosma, T.; Resing, W.C.M. Teacher’s appraisal of dynamic assessment outcomes: Recommendations for weak math-performers. J. Cogn. Educ. Psychol. 2010, 9, 91–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bridges, M.S.; Catts, H.W. The use of a dynamic screening of phonological awareness to predict risk for reading disabilities in kindergarten children. J. Learn. Disabil. 2011, 44, 330–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Compton, D.L.; Fuchs, D.; Fuchs, L.S.; Bouton, B.; Gilbert, J.K.; Barquero, L.A.; Crouch, R.C. Selecting at-risk first-grade readers for early interventions: Eliminating false positives and exploring the promise of a two-stage gated screening process. J. Educ. Psychol. 2010, 102, 327–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cho, E.; Compton, D.L.; Fuchs, D.; Fuchs, L.S.; Bouton, B. Examining the predictive validity of a dynamic assessment of decoding to forecast response to tier 2 intervention. J. Learn. Disabil. 2014, 47, 409–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cho, E.; Compton, D.L. Construct and incremental validity of dynamic assessment of decoding within and across domains. Learn. Individ. Differ. 2015, 37, 183–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fuchs, D.; Fuchs, L.S. Rethinking service delivery for students with significant learning problems developing and implementing intensive instruction. Remedial Spec. Educ. 2015, 36, 105–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wanzek, J.; Vaughn, S.; Scammacca, N.K.; Metz, K.; Murray, C.S.; Roberts, G.; Danielson, L. Extensive reading interventions for students with reading difficulties after Grade 3. Rev. Educ. Res. 2013, 83, 163–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vaughn, S.; Zumeta, R.; Wanzek, J.; Cook, B.; Klingner, J.K. Intensive interventions for students with learning disabilities in the RTI Era: Position statement of the Division for Learning Disabilities Council for Exceptional Children. Learn. Disabil. Res. Pract. 2014, 29, 90–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Regan, K.S.; Berkeley, S.L.; Hughes, M.; Brady, K.K. Understanding practitioner perceptions of responsiveness to intervention. Learn. Disabil. Q. 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
© 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Elliott, J.G.; Resing, W.C.M. Can Intelligence Testing Inform Educational Intervention for Children with Reading Disability? J. Intell. 2015, 3, 137-157. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence3040137
Elliott JG, Resing WCM. Can Intelligence Testing Inform Educational Intervention for Children with Reading Disability? Journal of Intelligence. 2015; 3(4):137-157. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence3040137
Chicago/Turabian StyleElliott, Julian G., and Wilma C. M. Resing. 2015. "Can Intelligence Testing Inform Educational Intervention for Children with Reading Disability?" Journal of Intelligence 3, no. 4: 137-157. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence3040137
APA StyleElliott, J. G., & Resing, W. C. M. (2015). Can Intelligence Testing Inform Educational Intervention for Children with Reading Disability? Journal of Intelligence, 3(4), 137-157. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence3040137