Next Article in Journal
Phenotypic, Genetic, and Environmental Correlations between Reaction Times and Intelligence in Young Twin Children
Previous Article in Journal
Can Intelligence Testing Inform Educational Intervention for Children with Reading Disability?
Editorial

Moving to the Double-Blind Review System

Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
J. Intell. 2015, 3(4), 158-159; https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence3040158
Received: 20 November 2015 / Revised: 20 November 2015 / Accepted: 20 November 2015 / Published: 1 December 2015
Note: In lieu of an abstract, this is an excerpt from the first page.

The Journal of Intelligence presently has a single-blind peer review system, unlike most other journals in the social sciences, where the double-blind peer review prevails. The choice between the two systems is not easy. Both systems have pros and cons, and a double-blind review can in fact be a single-blind review, depending on whether or not the authors can be identified after all. [...] View Full-Text
MDPI and ACS Style

De Boeck, P. Moving to the Double-Blind Review System. J. Intell. 2015, 3, 158-159. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence3040158

AMA Style

De Boeck P. Moving to the Double-Blind Review System. Journal of Intelligence. 2015; 3(4):158-159. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence3040158

Chicago/Turabian Style

De Boeck, Paul. 2015. "Moving to the Double-Blind Review System" Journal of Intelligence 3, no. 4: 158-159. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence3040158

Find Other Styles

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop