# Schrödinger Theory of Electrons in Electromagnetic Fields: New Perspectives

^{1}

^{2}

^{*}

## Abstract

**:**

## 1. Introduction

- (a)
- as a consequence of the correspondence principle, it is the vector potential $\mathbf{A}\left(\mathbf{r}\right)$ and not the magnetic field $\U0001d4d1\left(\mathbf{r}\right)$ that appears in it. This fact is significant, and is expressly employed to explain, for example, the Bohm–Aharonov [22] effect in which a vector potential can exist in a region of no magnetic field. The magnetic field $\U0001d4d1\left(\mathbf{r}\right)$ appears in the Schrödinger equation only following the choice of gauge;
- (b)
- the characteristics of the potential energy operator $v\left(\mathbf{r}\right)$ are the following:
- (i)
- for the N-electron system, it is assumed that the canonical kinetic and electron-interaction potential energy operators are known. As such, the potential $v\left(\mathbf{r}\right)$ is considered an extrinsic input to the Hamiltonian.
- (ii)
- the potential energy function $v\left(\mathbf{r}\right)$ is assumed known, e.g., it could be Coulombic, harmonic, Yukawa, etc.
- (iii)
- by assumption, the potential $v\left(\mathbf{r}\right)$ is path-independent.

## 2. Stationary State Theory: “Quantal Newtonian” First Law

## 3. New Perspectives

- (i)
- In addition to the external electrostatic $\U0001d4d4\left(\mathbf{r}\right)$ and Lorentz $\U0001d4db\left(\mathbf{r}\right)$ fields, each electron experiences an internal field ${\U0001d4d5}^{\mathrm{int}}\left(\mathbf{r}\right)$. This field via its ${\U0001d4d4}_{\mathrm{ee}}\left(\mathbf{r}\right)$ component is representative not only of Coulomb correlations as one might expect, but also those due to the Pauli exclusion principle due to the antisymmetric nature of the wave function. Additionally, there is a component $\U0001d4e9\left(\mathbf{r}\right)$ representative of the motion of the electrons; a component $\U0001d4d3\left(\mathbf{r}\right)$ representing the density, a fundamental property of the system [29]; and a term $\U0001d4d8\left(\mathbf{r}\right)$ that arises as a consequence of the external magnetic field [27]. Hence, each electron experiences an internal field that encapsulates all the basic properties of the system. As in classical physics, in summing over all the electrons, the contribution of the internal field vanishes, leading thereby to Ehrenfest’s (first law) theorem: $\int \rho \left(\mathbf{r}\right){\U0001d4d5}^{\mathrm{ext}}\left(\mathbf{r}\right)d\mathbf{r}=0$. (In fact, each component of the internal field is shown to separately vanish.).
- (ii)
- The “Quantal Newtonian” first law Equation (4) affords a rigorous physical interpretation of the external electrostatic potential $v\left(\mathbf{r}\right)$: it is the work done to move an electron from some reference point at infinity to its position at $\mathbf{r}$ in the force of a conservative field $\U0001d4d5\left(\mathbf{r}\right)$:$$v\left(\mathbf{r}\right)={\int}_{\infty}^{\mathbf{r}}\U0001d4d5\left({\mathbf{r}}^{\prime}\right)\xb7d{\ell}^{\prime},$$
- (iii)
- What the physical interpretation of the potential $v\left(\mathbf{r}\right)$ further shows is that it can no longer be thought of as an independent entity. It is intrinsically dependent upon all the properties of the system via the various components of the internal field ${\U0001d4d5}^{\mathrm{int}}\left(\mathbf{r}\right)$, and the Lorentz $\U0001d4db\left(\mathbf{r}\right)$ field through the current density $\mathbf{j}\left(\mathbf{r}\right)$. Hence, the potential energy function $v\left(\mathbf{r}\right)$ is comprised of the sum of constituent functions each representative of a property of the system.
- (iv)
- As each component of the internal field ${\U0001d4d5}^{\mathrm{int}}\left(\mathbf{r}\right)$ (and the Lorentz field $\U0001d4db\left(\mathbf{r}\right)$) are obtained from quantal sources that are expectations of Hermitian operators taken with respect to the wave function $\mathsf{\Psi}\left(\mathbf{X}\right)$, we see that the field $\U0001d4d5\left(\mathbf{r}\right)$ is a functional of $\mathsf{\Psi}\left(\mathbf{X}\right)$, i.e., $\U0001d4d5\left(\mathbf{r}\right)=\U0001d4d5\left[\mathsf{\Psi}\right(\mathbf{X}\left)\right]$. Thus, (from Equation (30)), $v\left(\mathbf{r}\right)$ is a functional of $\mathsf{\Psi}\left(\mathbf{X}\right):v\left(\mathbf{r}\right)=v\left[\mathsf{\Psi}\right(\mathbf{X}\left)\right]$. The functional $v\left[\mathsf{\Psi}\right(\mathbf{X}\left)\right]$ is exactly known [via Equation (30)].
- (v)
- On substituting the functional $v\left[\mathsf{\Psi}\right(\mathbf{X}\left)\right]$ into Equation (1), the Schrödinger equation may then be written as$$\left[\frac{1}{2}\sum _{i}{({\widehat{\mathbf{p}}}_{i}+\mathbf{A}\left({\mathbf{r}}_{i}\right))}^{2}+\frac{1}{2}\underset{i,j}{{\sum}^{\prime}}\frac{1}{|{\mathbf{r}}_{i}-{\mathbf{r}}_{j}|}+\sum _{i}v\left[\mathsf{\Psi}\right]\left({\mathbf{r}}_{i}\right)\right]\mathsf{\Psi}\left(\mathbf{X}\right)=E\mathsf{\Psi}\left(\mathbf{X}\right),$$$$\left[\frac{1}{2}\sum _{i}{({\widehat{\mathbf{p}}}_{i}+\mathbf{A}\left({\mathbf{r}}_{i}\right))}^{2}+\frac{1}{2}\underset{i,j}{{\sum}^{\prime}}\frac{1}{|{\mathbf{r}}_{i}-{\mathbf{r}}_{j}|}+\sum _{i}{\int}_{\infty}^{{\mathbf{r}}_{i}}\U0001d4d5\left[\mathsf{\Psi}\right]\left(\mathbf{r}\right)\xb7d\ell \right]\mathsf{\Psi}\left(\mathbf{X}\right)=E\mathsf{\Psi}\left(\mathbf{X}\right).$$

- (vi)
- Observe that in writing the Schrödinger equation as in Equations (31) and (32), the magnetic field $\U0001d4d1\left(\mathbf{r}\right)$ now appears in the Hamiltonian explicitly via the Lorentz field $\U0001d4db\left(\mathbf{r}\right)$ (see Equation (30)). It is the intrinsic self-consistent nature of the equation that demands the presence of $\U0001d4d1\left(\mathbf{r}\right)$ in the Hamiltonian. In other words, since the Hamiltonian $\widehat{H}\left[\mathsf{\Psi}\right]$ is being determined self-consistently, all the information of the physical system—electrons and fields—must be incorporated in it. (Of course, equivalently, the field $\U0001d4d1\left(\mathbf{r}\right)$ could be expressed in terms of the vector potential $\mathbf{A}\left(\mathbf{r}\right)$. This then shows that when written in self-consistent form, there exists another component of the Hamiltonian involving the vector potential.)
- (vii)
- The presence of a solely electrostatic external field $\U0001d4d4\left(\mathbf{r}\right)=-\mathbf{\nabla}v\left(\mathbf{r}\right)$ is a special case of the stationary state theory discussed above. This case then constitutes the description of matter as defined in the Introduction.

## 4. Examples: Quantum Dots in a Ground and Excited State

## 5. Time-Dependent Theory: “Quantal Newtonian” Second Law

## 6. Conclusions

## Acknowledgments

## Author Contributions

## Conflicts of Interest

## References and Notes

- Sahni, V.; Pan, X.-Y. Study of the Schrödinger Theory for Electrons in External Fields. Available online: http://meetings.aps.org/link/BAPS.2016.MAR.K31.13 (accessed on 9 March 2017).
- Sahni, V. Quantal Density Functional Theory, 2nd ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Sahni, V. Quantal Density Functional Theory II: Approximation Methods and Applications; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Qian, Z.; Sahni, V. Quantum mechanical interpretation of the time-dependent density functional theory. Phys. Lett. A
**1998**, 247, 303–308. [Google Scholar] - Qian, Z.; Sahni, V. Time-dependent differential virial theorems. Int. J. Quantum Chem.
**2000**, 78, 341–347. [Google Scholar] - Qian, Z.; Sahni, V. Sum rules and properties in time-dependent density functional theory. Phys. Rev. A
**2001**, 63, 042508. [Google Scholar] - Sahni, V.; Pan, X.-Y.; Yang, T. Electron correlations in local effective potential theory. Computation
**2016**, 4, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Sahni, V. Quantum-mechanical interpretation of density functional theory. In Density Functional Theory III; Nalewajski, R.F., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1996; pp. 1–39. [Google Scholar]
- Sahni, V. Physical interpretation of density functional theory and of its representation of the Hartree–Fock and Hartree theories. Phys. Rev. A
**1997**, 55, 1846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Holas, A.; March, N.H. Exact exchange-correlation potential and approximate exchange potential in terms of density matrices. Phys. Rev. A
**1995**, 51, 2040–2048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Harbola, M.K.; Sahni, V. Quantum-Mechanical Interpretation of the Exchange-Correlation Potential of Kohn–Sham Density-Functional Theory. Phys. Rev. Lett.
**1989**, 62, 489–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Sahni, V.; Harbola, M.K. Quantum-Mechanical Interpretation of the Local Many-Body Potential of Density-Functional Theory. Int. J. Quantum Chem.
**1990**, 24, 569–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Sahni, V.; Slamet, M. Interpretation of Electron Correlation in the Local Density Approximation for Exchange. Phys. Rev. B
**1993**, 48, 1910–1913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hartree, D.R. The Calculation of Atomic Structures; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1957. [Google Scholar]
- Fischer, C.F. The Hartree–Fock Theory for Atoms; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1977. [Google Scholar]
- Hohenberg, P.; Kohn, W. Inhomogeneous electron gas. Phys. Rev.
**1964**, 136, B864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Kohn, W.; Sham, L.J. Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects. Phys. Rev.
**1965**, 140, A1133. [Google Scholar] - Talman, J.D.; Shadwick, W.F. Optimized effective atomic central potential. Phys. Rev. A
**1976**, 14, 36–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Engel, E.; Vosko, S.H. Accurate optimized-potential-model solutions for spherical spin-polarized atoms: Evidence for limitations of the exchange-only local spin-density and generalized-gradient approximations. Phys. Rev. A
**1993**, 47, 2800–2811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Sahni, V.; Qian, Z.; Sen, K.D. Atomic Shell Structure in Hartree Theory. J. Chem. Phys.
**2001**, 114, 8784–8788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Sahni, V.; Li, Y.; Harbola, M.K. Atomic Structure in the Pauli-Correlated Approximation. Phys. Rev. A
**1992**, 45, 1434–1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Aharonov, Y.; Bohm, D. Significance of Electromagnetic Potentials in the Quantum Theory. Phys. Rev.
**1959**, 115, 485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Moiseiwitsch, B.L. Variational Principles; Wiley: London, UK, 1966. [Google Scholar]
- Pan, X.-Y.; Sahni, V.; Massa, L. Determination of a wave function functional. Phys. Rev. Lett.
**2004**, 93, 130401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Pan, X.-Y.; Slamet, M.; Sahni, V. Wave function functionals. Phys. Rev. A
**2010**, 81, 042524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Slamet, M.; Pan, X.-Y.; Sahni, V. Wave function functionals for the density. Phys. Rev. A
**2011**, 84, 052504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Yang, T.; Pan, X.-Y.; Sahni, V. Quantal density functional theory in the presence of a magnetic field. Phys. Rev. A
**2011**, 83, 042518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Holas, A.; March, N.H. Density matrices and density functionals in strong magnetic fields. Phys. Rev. A
**1997**, 56, 4595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - According to the first theorem of Hohenberg–Kohn [16], the nondegenerate ground state density ρ(
**r**) is a basic variable of quantum mechanics: A bijective relationship between this density and the external potential v(**r**) is proved. Hence, knowledge of this ρ(**r**) uniquely determines the potential v(**r**) to within a constant, which in turn determines the Hamiltonian of the electrons, and via the Schrödinger equation, the wave functions of the system. Hence, although this density is a one-body property, it incorporates all the many-body information such that both ground and excited state properties of a system can be determined via its knowledge. We note that in the “Quantal Newtonian” first law, the density is not restricted to the nondegenerate ground state but rather is arbitrary in that it corresponds to the state being considered. - Ashoori, R.C. Electrons in artificial atoms. Nature
**1996**, 379, 413–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Taut, M. Two electrons in a homogeneous magnetic field: Particular analytical solutions. J. Phys. A
**1994**, 27, 1045; Corrigenda. J. Phys. A**1994**, 27, 4723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Taut, M.; Eschrig, H. Exact solutions for a two-electron quantum dot model in a magnetic field and application to more complex systems. Z. Phys. Chem.
**2010**, 224, 631–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Slamet, M.; Sahni, V. Study of a Quantum Dot in an Excited State. Available online: http://meetings.aps.org/link/BAPS.2016.MAR.H31.10 (accessed on 9 March 2017).
- Slamet, M.; Sahni, V. Electron correlations in an excited state of a Quantum Dot in a uniform magnetic field. Phys. Rev. A
**2017**. in preparation. [Google Scholar] - Zhu, H.M.; Chen, J.-W.; Pan, X.-Y.; Sahni, V. Wave function for harmonically confined electrons in time-dependent electric and magnetostatic fields. J. Chem. Phys.
**2014**, 140, 024318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Kohn, W. Cyclotron resonance and de Haas-Van Alphen oscillations of an interacting electron gas. Phys. Rev.
**1961**, 123, 1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Brey, L.; Johnson, N.F.; Halperin, B.I. Optical and magneto-optical absorption in parabolic quantum wells. Phys. Rev. B
**1989**, 40, 10647–10649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Yip, S.K. Magneto-optical absorption by electrons in the presence of parabolic confinement potentials. Phys. Rev. B
**1991**, 43, 1707–1718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Maksym, P.A.; Chakraborty, T. Quantum dots in a magnetic field: Role of electron-electron interactions. Phys. Rev. Lett.
**1990**, 65, 108–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Peters, F.M. Magneto-optics in parabolic quantum dots. Phys. Rev. B
**1990**, 42, 1486–1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Dobson, J. Harmonic potential theorem: Implications for approximate many-body theories. Phys. Rev. Lett.
**1994**, 73, 2244–2247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

**Figure 2.**The electron-interaction ${\U0001d4d4}_{\mathrm{ee}}\left(\mathbf{r}\right)$, kinetic $\U0001d4e9\left(\mathbf{r}\right)$, and differential density $\U0001d4d3\left(\mathbf{r}\right)$ components of the internal field ${\U0001d4d5}^{\mathrm{int}}\left(\mathbf{r}\right)$ for a quantum dot in a magnetic field in its ground state. The sums $\U0001d4d3\left(\mathbf{r}\right)+\U0001d4e9\left(\mathbf{r}\right)$, and $-{\U0001d4d4}_{\mathrm{ee}}\left(\mathbf{r}\right)+\U0001d4e9\left(\mathbf{r}\right)+\U0001d4d3\left(\mathbf{r}\right)=-{k}_{\mathrm{eff}}r$ with ${k}_{\mathrm{eff}}=1$ are also plotted.

**Figure 3.**Same as in Figure 2 but for a quantum dot in a magnetic field in its first excited singlet state with ${k}_{\mathrm{eff}}=0.471716$.

© 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

## Share and Cite

**MDPI and ACS Style**

Sahni, V.; Pan, X.-Y.
Schrödinger Theory of Electrons in Electromagnetic Fields: New Perspectives. *Computation* **2017**, *5*, 15.
https://doi.org/10.3390/computation5010015

**AMA Style**

Sahni V, Pan X-Y.
Schrödinger Theory of Electrons in Electromagnetic Fields: New Perspectives. *Computation*. 2017; 5(1):15.
https://doi.org/10.3390/computation5010015

**Chicago/Turabian Style**

Sahni, Viraht, and Xiao-Yin Pan.
2017. "Schrödinger Theory of Electrons in Electromagnetic Fields: New Perspectives" *Computation* 5, no. 1: 15.
https://doi.org/10.3390/computation5010015