Principles of Building Digital Twins to Design Integrated Energy Systems
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Prerequisites for the Transition to Digital Twins
3. Principles of Building Digital Twins for Designing Integrated Energy Systems
- Complex engineering calculations are done to find the best ways to transform the IESs in order to improve the efficiency and reliability of their operation;
- Modeling of IES, including various types of energy systems with their individual characteristics, given the hierarchical principle of its construction;
- A single information space organized to solve the IES design problems;
- Bidirectional communication between the external environment and the digital twin of the IES to track changes and update information in the digital twin and generate IES design solutions;
- Tracking the dynamics of IES development over time;
- Consideration of the plurality of decision-making centers for the supply of energy of various types with the possibility of converting one type into another one when solving the IES design problems;
- The need to consider a large number of IES components with complex behavior;
- The knowledge about the IES, its subsystems, the software used, and the features of solving the IES design problems.
4. Approach to Designing an Integrated Energy System Based on Its Digital Twin
- An architecture of the software platform for creating digital twins;
- A set of technologies and tools for the platform implementation;
- Methods for automated construction of a digital twin based on the MDE concept;
- An algorithm for solving the problem of IES design based on its digital twin;
- Principles of organization of the computational process using the multi-agent approach.
- Description of data structures of IES and its subsystems;
- Description of software components that implement mathematical models and methods for solving an applied problem;
- A graph describing the computational process;
- A set of data structures, which describes input and output parameters.
- Computer model of the IES (data structures describing the configuration of the system and the properties of its constituent components);
- Mathematical tools (including mathematical models and algorithms);
- Software components (graphic, system, applied mathematical, typical models of components of the IES subsystems) integrated into a single software system;
- Interactive graphical user interface, including a graphical computer model;
- Data storage that contains the values of the properties of the system and its components at different points in time;
- System of data exchange with the external environment.
5. Implementation of the Digital Twin of the Integrated Energy System
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Stennikov, V.; Barakhtenko, E.; Sokolov, D.; Zhou, B. Current state of research on the energy management and expansion planning of integrated energy systems. Energy Rep. 2022, 8, 10025–10036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Voropai, N.I.; Stennikov, V.A.; Barakhtenko, E.A. Integrated energy systems: Challenges, trends, philosophy. Stud. Russ. Econ. Dev. 2017, 28, 492–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Voropai, N.I.; Stennikov, V.A.; Barakhtenko, E.A. Methodological principles of constructing the integrated energy supply systems and their technological architecture. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2018, 1111, 012001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gelernter, D. Mirror Worlds: Or the Day Software Puts the Universe in a Shoebox. How It Will Happen and What It Will Mean; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- Tao, F.; Sui, F.; Liu, A.; Qi, Q.; Zhang, M.; Song, B.; Guo, Z.; Lu, S.C.-Y.; Nee, A.Y.C. Digital twin-driven product design framework. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2019, 57, 3935–3953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lim, K.Y.H.; Zheng, P.; Chen, C. A state-of-the-art survey of Digital Twin: Techniques, engineering product lifecycle management and business innovation perspectives. J. Intell. Manuf. 2020, 31, 1313–1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharif Ullah, A.M.M. Modeling and simulation of complex manufacturing phenomena using sensor signals from the perspective of Industry 4.0. Adv. Eng. Inform. 2019, 39, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pileggi, P.; Verriet, J.; Broekhuijsen, J.; van Leeuwen, C.; Wijbrandi, W.; Konsman, M. A Digital Twin for Cyber-Physical Energy Systems. In Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Modeling and Simulation of Cyber-Physical Energy Systems, Montreal, QC, Canada, 5–15 April 2019; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, X. Machine Tool 4.0 for the New Era of Manufacturing. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2017, 92, 1893–1900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zambrano, V.; Mueller-Roemer, J.; Sandberg, M.; Talasila, P.; Zanin, D.; Larsen, P.G.; Loeschner, E.; Thronicke, W.; Pietraroia, D.; Landolfi, G.; et al. Industrial digitalization in the industry 4.0 era: Classification, reuse and authoring of digital models on Digital Twin platforms. Array 2022, 14, 100176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karanjkar, N.; Joglekar, A.; Mohanty, S.; Prabhu, V.; Raghunath, D.; Sundaresan, R. Digital Twin for Energy Optimization in an SMT-PCB Assembly Line. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Internet of Things and Intelligence System, Bali, Indonesia, 1–3 November 2018; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Katsidoniotaki, E.; Psarommatis, F.; Göteman, M. Digital Twin for the Prediction of Extreme Loads on a Wave Energy Conversion System. Energies 2022, 15, 5464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agostinelli, S.; Cumo, F.; Guidi, G.; Tomazzoli, C. Cyber-Physical Systems Improving Building Energy Management: Digital Twin and Artificial Intelligence. Energies 2021, 14, 2338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bányai, Á.; Bányai, T. Real-Time Maintenance Policy Optimization in Manufacturing Systems: An Energy Efficiency and Emission-Based Approach. Sustainability 2022, 14, 10725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fathy, Y.; Jaber, M.; Nadeem, Z. Digital Twin-Driven Decision Making and Planning for Energy Consumption. J. Sens. Actuator Netw. 2021, 10, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Henzel, J.; Wróbel, Ł.; Fice, M.; Sikora, M. Energy Consumption Forecasting for the Digital-Twin Model of the Building. Energies 2022, 15, 4318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- You, M.; Wang, Q.; Sun, H.; Castro, I.; Jiang, J. Digital twins based day-ahead integrated energy system scheduling under load and renewable energy uncertainties. Appl. Energy 2022, 305, 117899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Voropai, N.I.; Massel, L.V.; Kolosok, I.N.; Massel, A.G. IT-Infrastructure for Construction of Intelligent Management Systems of Development and Functioning of Energy Systems Based on Digital Twins and Digital Images. Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk. Energ. 2021, 1, 3–13. (In Russian) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tao, F.; Zhang, H.; Liu, A.; Nee, A.Y.C. Digital Twin in Industry: State-of-the-Art. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2019, 15, 2405–2415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kasper, L.; Birkelbach, F.; Schwarzmayr, P.; Steindl, G.; Ramsauer, D.; Hofmann, R. Toward a Practical Digital Twin Platform Tailored to the Requirements of Industrial Energy Systems. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 6981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, H.; Zhang, T.; Huang, Y. Digital Twin Technology for Integrated Energy System and Its Application. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Digital Twins and Parallel Intelligence), Beijing, China, 15 July–15 August 2021; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Chen, Q.; Gao, J.; Li, Z.; Chen, X. Hardware-in-loop based Digital Twin Technology for Integrated Energy System: A Case Study of Guangyang Island in Chongqing. In Proceedings of the 5th International Electrical and Energy Conference, Nangjing, China, 27–29 May 2022; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bai, H.; Yuan, Z.; Tang, X.; Liu, J.; Yang, W.; Pan, S.; Xue, Y.; Liu, W. Automatic Modeling and Optimization for The Digital twin of a Regional Multi-energy System. In Proceedings of the Power System and Green Energy Conference, Shanghai, China, 25–27 August 2022; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kannan, K.; Arunachalam, N. A Digital Twin for Grinding Wheel: An Information Sharing Platform for Sustainable Grinding Process. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2019, 141, 021015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moreno, A.; Velez, G.; Ardanza, A.; Barandiaran, I.; de Infante, Á.R.; Chopitea, R. Virtualisation process of a sheet metal punching machine within the Industry 4.0 vision. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. 2017, 11, 365–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, S.; Shehab, E.; Higgins, N.; Fowler, K.; Reynolds, D.; Erkoyuncu, J.A.; Gadd, P. Data management for developing digital twin ontology model. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B J. Eng. Manuf. 2020, 235, 2323–2337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Steindl, G.; Stagl, M.; Kasper, L.; Kastner, W.; Hofmann, R. Generic Digital Twin Architecture for Industrial Energy Systems. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 8903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Steinmetz, C.; Rettberg, A.; Ribeiro, F.G.C.; Schroeder, G.; Pereira, C.E. Internet of Things Ontology for Digital Twin in Cyber Physical Systems. In Proceedings of the VIII Brazilian Symposium on Computing Systems Engineering, Salvador, Brazil, 5–8 November 2018; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Massel, L.; Vorozhtsova, T. An ontological approach to the construction of digital twins of energy objects and systems. Ontol. Proekt. 2020, 10, 327–337. (In Russian) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Azure Digital Twins. Available online: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/digital-twins/ (accessed on 1 September 2022).
- IBM Engineering Lifecycle Optimization. Available online: https://www.ibm.com/ru-ru/products/engineering-lifecycle-optimization/engineering-insights (accessed on 1 September 2022).
- Siemens, MindSphere. Available online: https://new.siemens.com/ru/ru/produkty/programmnoe-obespechenie/mindsphere.html (accessed on 1 September 2022).
- GE, PREDIX. Available online: https://www.ge.com/digital/applications/digital-twin (accessed on 1 September 2022).
- Power Analytics. Available online: https://www.poweranalytics.com/paladin-software/ (accessed on 1 September 2022).
- ABB, ABBAbility. Available online: https://new.abb.com/abb-ability/ru (accessed on 1 September 2022).
- Khasilev, V.Y. Elements of the theory of hydraulic circuits. Bull. USSR Acad. Sci. Energy Transp. 1964, 69–88. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
- Merenkov, A.P.; Khasilev, V.Y. Theory of Hydraulic Circuits; Nauka: Moscow, Russia, 1985. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
- Stennikov, V.; Barakhtenko, E.; Mayorov, G.; Sokolov, D.; Zhou, B. Coordinated management of centralized and distributed generation in an integrated energy system using a multi-agent approach. Appl. Energy 2022, 309, 118487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yorke, R. Electric Circuit Theory; Pergamon Press: Oxford, UK, 1981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Staab, S.; Walter, T.; Gröner, G.; Parreiras, F.S. Model driven engineering with ontology technologies. Reasoning Web. In Reasoning Web 2010: Reasoning Web. Semantic Technologies for Software Engineering; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; pp. 62–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Brambilla, M.; Cabot, J.; Wimmer, M. Model-driven software engineering in practice. In Synthesis Lectures on Software Engineering; Morgan & Claypool: Kentfield, CA, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Silva da, A.R. Model-driven engineering: A survey supported by the unified conceptual model. Comput. Lang. Syst. Struct. 2015, 43, 139–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gruber, T.R. A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowl. Acquis. 1993, 5, 199–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Staab, S.; Studer, R. Handbook on Ontologies, 2nd ed.; Springer: Heidelberg, Germany, 2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stennikov, V.A.; Barakhtenko, E.A.; Sokolov, D.V. A Methodological Approach to the Software Development for Heating System Design. In Proceedings of the International Multi-Conference on Industrial Engineering and Modern Technologies, Vladivostok, Russia, 3–4 October 2018; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stennikov, V.A.; Barakhtenko, E.A.; Sokolov, D.V. Development of Information and Technology Platform for Optimal Design of Heating Systems. In Proceedings of the 7th Scientific Conference on Information Technologies for Intelligent Decision Making Support, Ufa, Russia, 28–29 May 2019; Atlantis Press: Paris, France, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hazzard, K.; Bock, J. Metaprogramming in NET; Manning Publications: Shelter Island, NY, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Lämmel, R. Software Languages: Syntax, Semantics, and Metaprogramming; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Ren, Y.; Fan, D.; Feng, Q.; Wang, Z.; Sun, B.; Yang, D. Agent-based restoration approach for reliability with load balancing on smart grids. Appl. Energy 2019, 249, 46–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Z.; Jing, R.; Lin, J.; Wang, X.; van Dam, K.H.; Wang, M.; Meng, C.; Xie, S.; Zhao, Y. Combining agent-based residential demand modeling with design optimization for integrated energy systems planning and operation. Appl. Energy 2020, 263, 114623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Name | Heat Generation, Gcal/h | Electricity Generation, MW | Gas Supply, m3/h | Workload, % |
---|---|---|---|---|
CHPP | 350.0 | 300.0 | - | 50.0 |
HPP | - | 420.9 | - | 84.2 |
Boiler house | 200.0 | - | - | 50.0 |
GDS | - | - | 87,240.0 | 58.2 |
Name | Electrical Load, MW | Heat Load, Gcal/h | Gas Load, m3 | Cold Load, MW | Heat Generation, Gcal/h | Electricity Generation, MW | Cold Generation, MW |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Prosumer No 1 | 150.0 | 180.0 | 6000.0 | 30.0 | 40.2 | 60.0 | 30.0 |
Prosumer No 2 | 120.0 | 150.0 | 5000.0 | 27.0 | 100.0 | 50.0 | 27.0 |
Prosumer No 3 | 90.0 | 120.0 | 4000.0 | 21.0 | 70.0 | 55.0 | 21.0 |
Name TPL | Electric Power Flow, MW | Name HM | Heat Transfer, Gcal/h | Name GM | Gas Flow Rate, m3/h |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
TPL No 1 | 0.0 | HM No 1 | 200.0 | GM No 1 | 44,705.0 |
TPL No 2 | 15.0 | HM No 2 | 85.9 | GM No 2 | 3030.0 |
TPL No 3 | 405.9 | HM No 3 | 36.1 | GM No 3 | 41,675.0 |
TPL No 4 | 375.9 | HM No 4 | 78.1 | GM No 4 | 4040.0 |
TPL No 5 | 128.3 | HM No 5 | 144.2 | GM No 5 | 35,110.0 |
TPL No 6 | 45.9 | HM No 6 | 0.0 | GM No 6 | 2525.0 |
TPL No 7 | 0.0 | HM No 7 | 57.8 | GM No 7 | 6060.0 |
TPL No 8 | 108.9 | HM No 8 | 202.0 | GM No 8 | 5050.0 |
TPL No 9 | 0.0 | HM No 9 | 0.0 | GM No 9 | 24,000.0 |
TPL No 10 | 68.3 | HM No 10 | 65.1 | GM No 10 | 42,535.0 |
TPL No 11 | 51.5 | HM No 11 | 148.1 | GM No 11 | 39,000.0 |
TPL No 12 | 300.0 | HM No 12 | 83.0 | GM No 12 | 3535.0 |
TPL No 13 | 71.4 | - | - | - | - |
TPL No 14 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - |
TPL No 15 | 30.0 | - | - | - | - |
TPL No 16 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Stennikov, V.; Barakhtenko, E.; Sokolov, D.; Mayorov, G. Principles of Building Digital Twins to Design Integrated Energy Systems. Computation 2022, 10, 222. https://doi.org/10.3390/computation10120222
Stennikov V, Barakhtenko E, Sokolov D, Mayorov G. Principles of Building Digital Twins to Design Integrated Energy Systems. Computation. 2022; 10(12):222. https://doi.org/10.3390/computation10120222
Chicago/Turabian StyleStennikov, Valery, Evgeny Barakhtenko, Dmitry Sokolov, and Gleb Mayorov. 2022. "Principles of Building Digital Twins to Design Integrated Energy Systems" Computation 10, no. 12: 222. https://doi.org/10.3390/computation10120222
APA StyleStennikov, V., Barakhtenko, E., Sokolov, D., & Mayorov, G. (2022). Principles of Building Digital Twins to Design Integrated Energy Systems. Computation, 10(12), 222. https://doi.org/10.3390/computation10120222