Next Article in Journal
Experimental Analysis of Stemming on Jurisprudential Documents Retrieval
Next Article in Special Issue
On the Use of Affordable COTS Hardware for Network Measurements: Limits and Good Practices
Previous Article in Journal
Importance Degree Research of Safety Risk Management Processes of Urban Rail Transit Based on Text Mining Method
Previous Article in Special Issue
Performance Study of Adaptive Video Streaming in an Interference Scenario of Femto-Macro Cell Networks
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessReview
Information 2018, 9(2), 27;

A Comparative Study of Web Content Management Systems

Department of Information Technologies and Communications, Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena (UPCT), Edif. Cuartel de Antigones, Plaza del Hospital 1, 30202 Cartagena, Spain
Department of Information and Communications Engineering, Universidad de Murcia (UM), Avda. Teniente Flomesta, 5, 30003 Murcia, Spain
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 15 December 2017 / Revised: 22 January 2018 / Accepted: 25 January 2018 / Published: 27 January 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Selected Papers from WMNC 2017 and JITEL 2017)
Full-Text   |   PDF [2062 KB, uploaded 30 January 2018]   |  


Web Content Management Systems (WCMS) play an increasingly important role in the Internet’s evolution. They are software platforms that facilitate the implementation of a web site or an e-commerce and are gaining popularity due to its flexibility and ease of use. In this work, we explain from a tutorial perspective how to manage WCMS and what can be achieved by using them. With this aim, we select the most popular open-source WCMS; namely, Joomla!, WordPress, and Drupal. Then, we implement three websites that are equal in terms of requirements, visual aspect, and functionality, one for each WCMS. Through a qualitative comparative analysis, we show the advantages and drawbacks of each solution, and the complexity associated. On the other hand, security concerns can arise if WCMS are not appropriately used. Due to the key position that they occupy in today’s Internet, we perform a basic security analysis of the three implement websites in the second part of this work. Specifically, we explain vulnerabilities, security enhancements, which errors should not be done, and which WCMS is initially safer. View Full-Text
Keywords: web content management systems; websites; web pages; security; joomla!; wordpress; drupal; internet web content management systems; websites; web pages; security; joomla!; wordpress; drupal; internet

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Martinez-Caro, J.-M.; Aledo-Hernandez, A.-J.; Guillen-Perez, A.; Sanchez-Iborra, R.; Cano, M.-D. A Comparative Study of Web Content Management Systems. Information 2018, 9, 27.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Information EISSN 2078-2489 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top