1. Introduction
In an era characterized by rapid technological advancements and global economic integration, the process of digitalization has emerged as a critical catalyst for transforming companies and the entire economy. The digitalization of industries and companies encompasses the adoption and integration of digital technologies into various aspects of business, with the goal of enhancing efficiency, competitiveness, and innovation [
1,
2]. This concept is multifaceted and involves a wide range of technologies, including cloud computing, big data analytics, the Internet of Things (IoT), and artificial intelligence (AI) [
3]. However, the significance of digitalization does not solely stem from the adoption of these technologies but also from the fundamental changes they bring to business models, processes, and strategies. The effects of successful digitalization are manifested through improved operational efficiency, enhanced customer experiences, data-driven decision-making, and access to new markets. Consequently, in today’s fast-paced, interconnected world, the ability to exploit the potential of digitalization has become a key determinant of competitiveness and long-term sustainability.
Although digitalization offers vast opportunities for companies, it also presents a unique set of challenges. Issues such as the digital divide, data security concerns, and the rapid obsolescence of technology are among the problems that organizations must navigate. In particular, small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), which are the backbone of most economies and significantly contribute to job creation and economic growth, face distinct challenges in their digitalization processes [
4].
In the landscape of European economic research, the categorization of enterprises by size plays a pivotal role in both policy formulation and empirical analysis. According to Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC, SMEs encompass micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises, collectively constituting a dominant 99% of all EU enterprises. This categorization not only offers structural insights but also serves as a prerequisite for accessing specific EU financial and support mechanisms tailored to SMEs. As per EU Recommendation 2003/361, micro enterprises are defined as those with no more than 10 employees and a turnover or balance sheet total not exceeding EUR 2 million. Small enterprises, on the other hand, are characterized by having fewer than 50 employees and financial thresholds of EUR 10 million in turnover or as the balance sheet total. Meanwhile, medium-sized enterprises fall within the intermediate range. They are companies with fewer than 250 employees and financial figures below EUR 50 million in turnover or EUR 43 million on the balance sheet. Large enterprises, by definition, surpass the parameters set for medium-sized enterprises in terms of both headcount and financial criteria [
5].
Therefore, understanding the distinctiveness of digitalization in the context of SMEs is important to enhancing their efforts and results. These enterprises often operate within limited resources, technical expertise, and financial constraints, making digitalization initiatives particularly complex and distinctive. Consequently, it becomes crucial to investigate and understand the specific needs, barriers, and benefits that SMEs encounter during their digitalization processes in order to enable the creation of more effective solutions and strategies tailored to their unique circumstances.
Digitalization holds a significant impact on the operations of SMEs. It positively influences’ participation in export and import activities and their overall productivity [
6]. Furthermore, within the Italian agri-food sector, digitalization enables the adoption of circular economy principles, enabling better resource management and waste reduction [
7].
However, the adoption of digitalization in SMEs is not without its challenges. Particular factors, such as performance expectancy, perceived effort, facilitating conditions, and competitive pressure significantly influence the decision to embrace digitalization [
8]. Further exploration of the factors influencing whether German SMEs decide on digital transformation addressed the knowledge gap in the context of digitalization [
9]. The impact of digitalization on technological innovations varies depending on the form of digitalization and the type of innovation, with the effects potentially being mitigated through intensified internal research and development activities [
10].
For successful digital transformation, having a clear strategic vision is also crucial. Some authors [
11] have investigated how a strategic vision of digitalization can positively affect the digital transformation of SMEs, with this effect further enhanced through resource orchestration. Concurrently, another group of authors [
12] outlined three key objectives—digital strategy, information technology, and employee skills—aimed at illuminating the antecedents, consequences, and challenges associated with the digitalization of SMEs, thus providing substantial contributions to this field.
Providing insights into the digitalization of business processes in Yemen, Saleh and Manjunath [
13] conducted a review of existing literature. Their review revealed the potential of SMEs to embark on digitalization endeavors that contribute to economic growth and development. Happonen et al. [
14] investigated digitalization-related business models arising from university–SME collaborations, offering fresh perspectives on the symbiotic relationship between academia and SMEs in the digital era. Ghobakhloo et al. [
15] contributed to the study of manufacturing SMEs and provided practical guidelines for achieving digital transformation within the framework of Industry 4.0, empowering them with knowledge and tools to navigate through the digital age. Legowo et al. [
16] enriched the research field with additional insights about the digitalization of SMEs across diverse contexts.
Although digitalization is a thoroughly researched area, there is a significant gap in the literature when it comes to SMEs. Much of the existing literature primarily focuses on large companies or explores digitalization in a global context, leaving a significant knowledge gap regarding the specificities of SMEs. This article seeks to bridge this gap by specifically concentrating on SMEs in Slovenia and aims to uncover insights that are often overlooked in more general studies, offering a tailored perspective on digitalization within a particular business environment.
Studies often treat SMEs as scaled-down versions of large companies, overlooking the specific challenges they face during the process of digitalization, such as resource constraints, limited IT expertise, and the influence of unique organizational cultures. The digital ecosystem is diverse and consists of a range of technologies, each varying in complexity and knowledge requirements. Existing literature often groups these technologies together without delving into their individual characteristics.
This article makes a valuable contribution by providing a detailed overview of various digital technologies and their adoption patterns among SMEs. By distinctly differentiating among technologies, the article offers valuable insights into which specific technologies pose challenges or opportunities for such companies. Moreover, understanding the support needs of SMEs during digitalization is also essential. Nonetheless, the existing literature often overlooks this aspect. Thus, this article tries to bridge this gap by exploring the support requirements of SMEs, covering various aspects such as strategy development, employee training, financing, and solution providers, with the aim of providing a more comprehensive understanding of the support ecosystem needed for successful digitalization within SMEs. Although many studies in the field provide theoretical frameworks and present case studies, empirical data directly collected from SMEs in Slovenia are relatively scarce, particularly in terms of including micro companies. To address this gap, this article presents primary empirical data obtained through a survey conducted among SMEs in Slovenia, offering a more grounded and contextually specific contribution to the literature by relying on the real experiences and perspectives of these businesses.
This article also aimed to investigate whether significant differences exist in the challenges and support needs of SMEs based on their size, categorizing them as micro, small, medium, or large companies. Such comparative analysis is often missing in the existing literature, which tends to treat SMEs as a homogenous group. By differentiating between these size categories, this research aims to provide a nuanced understanding of how a company’s size influences its digitalization experiences and requirements. The existing literature typically centers on a singular facet of digitalization—be it challenges, benefits, or support mechanisms. This article broadens the understanding by presenting a holistic view of digitalization within Slovenian SMEs, integrating various aspects, including characteristics, challenges, and support needs, and thus delivering a more comprehensive view of the digitalization landscape.
The article is structured as follows. First, the literature review on the use of digital technologies, digitalization effects and challenges for SMEs, and their needs for successful digitalization is provided, with identified gaps and justified hypotheses. This is followed by a methodology explanation and the results of the empirical analysis, including hypotheses testing. The article concludes with a discussion and conclusions.
4. Results
As noted in the Introduction, digital transformation encompasses the development and adoption of various technologies. In our research, we examined which technological solutions have been employed by the companies. Respondents had the option to choose from 15 different technologies and mark all of the ones they use (
Figure 1). The results indicate that the companies predominantly utilize simple, widely accepted, and long-standing technological solutions, such as websites (91%), tools for team support (87%), paperless business programs (79%), and social networks (73%). On the other hand, advanced or newer technologies like blockchain (10%), 3D printing (15%), and industrial and service robots (18%) were least represented among the companies’ responses.
The effects that companies aim to achieve through digitalization are highly diverse and dependent right on their needs and the technological solutions they employ.
Table 2 illustrates this using a 5-point Likert scale, where 1 signifies “no effect” and 5 denotes “a very large effect”. It shows that the surveyed companies have predominantly achieved seamless remote work, evidenced by an average rating of 3.64, closely followed by improved business efficiency and then by enhanced access to information and overall operational quality. As previously noted, the companies extensively utilize tools for team support (87%,
Figure 1), and their assessment of achieving smooth remote work indicates the successful implementation of this technology. The companies have achieved the least in terms of differentiation, integration into supply chains, and changes in company culture.
All companies face various challenges when adopting new initiatives, and this holds true for digitalization as well. As illustrated in
Table 3, the results from a 5-point Likert scale, where 1 signifies “does not represent a problem” and 5 denotes “represents a significant problem”, reveal that the most significant issues for companies are the necessary financial resources for digitalization (mean value: 3.13) and the lack of suitable employees (mean value: 3.08). A similar observation was made by Pucihar et al. [
60] in a study among Slovenian SMEs.
The financial resources aspect consists of two dimensions, with the second often being overlooked. First, the (initial) investment in digital technologies or tools represents an initial cost. Although companies have various measures available for such investments, this initial cost is typically high. The second aspect, often overlooked by companies, especially in the beginning, is the maintenance of technological solutions. These costs can be relatively high for small companies and represent ongoing expenses. Additionally, technology needs occasional upgrades, requiring further investments. From a financial perspective, the aspects of technological solutions can place a significant burden on companies.
Another common challenge highlighted by the surveyed companies is the lack of suitable employees due to overwork. Given that the survey primarily focused on small businesses, this result was expected since they often grapple with resource shortages, and employees end up handling multiple roles within the company, leading to overwork. Interestingly, companies perceive fewer issues with the adequacy of knowledge compared to employee overwork. The least significant difficulty the companies face is in finding suitable digital solutions, indicating that there are enough technological solutions available on the market that companies can leverage or that there are specialized solution providers tailored to individual company needs. This observation aligns with the findings of studies in Slovenia by SURS [
61] and Pucihar et al. [
60], who identified a shortage of skilled personnel as the primary reason for the slow pace of digitization in SMEs. Therefore, based on this, we tested the following hypothesis:
H1. There is a significant difference in the mean scores for challenges faced by companies in digitalization among at least one of the four groups (micro, small, medium, and large companies).
In the context of our study, ANOVA helped us assess whether there were statistically significant differences in the mean scores for challenges faced by companies in the four groups (micro, small, medium, and large) concerning digitalization. The results from
Table 4 enabled us to ascertain whether significant differences exist in the challenges encountered by these groups, providing valuable insights into how company size impacts digitalization challenges.
The ANOVA results indicate a statistically significant difference among groups concerning the perceived lack of financial resources for digitalization. The F-statistic is a measure that assesses the variance ratio between group means compared to within-group variance. An elevated F-value indicates a deviation greater than what we might expect due to random chance [
62]. Notably, our analysis of various variables revealed pronounced F-values for two specific factors: “lack of financial resources for digitalization” (F = 3.047) and “lack of suitable employees for digitalization due to overwork” (F = 2.218). These F-values indicate distinct variations in challenges perceived by companies of different sizes. In statistical terms, a high F-statistic theoretically corresponds to a reduced
p-value, which suggests a notable difference in group means. The calculated F-statistic of 3.047 exceeded the critical value (
p ≤ 0.05), suggesting the presence of significant difference between the groups. This finding is further supported by the robust test of equality of means, affirming this difference (
p ≤ 0.05).
The mean square between groups of 5.552 and the mean square within groups of 1.823 provide additional insight. The mean square deviation between groups represents the differences in responses between the different company size groups. On the other hand, the within-group mean square value reflects the differences within each group. The fact that the mean square deviation between groups was higher than the mean square deviation within groups suggests that differences in perceived lack of financial resources are more pronounced between groups than within groups [
63]. Degrees of freedom refer to the data points that can vary when estimating parameters. In our analysis, we had 3 degrees of freedom for the “between groups” component, which signifies that we studied four company size groups. On the other hand, the “within groups” metric was calculated as the difference between the total number of observations and the number of groups.
Moreover, with a significance level of 0.1, the ANOVA results indicate there might be a potential difference in the perceived lack of suitable employees for digitalization due to overwork among the groups. The calculated F-statistic was 2.218, with an associated p-value of 0.086. This suggests that there is some statistical evidence to support the hypothesis, indicating that there might be meaningful differences in the groups concerning the perceived lack of suitable employees for digitalization due to overwork. Additionally, the robust test of equality of means also pointed to a statistical difference at a significance level of p ≤ 0.1.
Based on the obtained results, significant differences among the groups were evident.
Table 5 below provides a detailed overview of these specific group differences. Using the Games–Howell post hoc test [
64], we identified a significant difference between micro and medium-sized companies regarding the perceived lack of financial resources for digitalization (
p = 0.098;
p ≤ 0.1). No significant differences were found for other group combinations.
Small businesses often face a lack of various resources necessary for effective business development, indicating a pronounced need for support within a functional entrepreneurial ecosystem. To provide adequate support, the supportive environment must align with the needs of SMEs. Based on data collection through a 5-point Likert scale, the surveyed companies identified financial support in digitalization process as their most pressing need, with a mean value of 3.91 (
Table 6). This finding is consistent with previously identified challenges related to a lack of financial resources.
Following the need for financial resources, companies also expressed a need for support during the digitalization process, particularly when conducting the implementation process themselves. However, it must be noted that the companies rated all of the listed areas as above average, indicating a broad need for support across various facets of digitalization. Their needs extend beyond financial aspects, also encompassing knowledge and skills both in managing digitalization projects and in utilizing digital and technological solutions. Therefore, based on these findings, we tested the second hypothesis:
H2. There is a significant difference in the mean scores of support needs for digitalization among at least one of the four groups (micro, small, medium, and large companies).
To test the hypothesis, the ANOVA statistical technique was used again to evaluate whether there were significant differences among the means of the groups. The results are shown in
Table 7 below.
The results imply that there is some evidence indicating the possibility of significant disparities among group means concerning the support needed for digitalization. The ANOVA results for the variable “In enhancing the digital competencies and knowledge of employees” show that there was a noteworthy finding. The calculated F-statistic was 2.525, and the associated p-value was 0.058. With a significance level set at p ≤ 0.1, the p-value was just slightly above this threshold, suggesting a borderline result. The robust test of equality of means also confirms this observation, indicating a significant difference (p ≤ 0.05).
Table 8 provides a comprehensive analysis of specific group differences. The results from a post hoc test reveal statistically significant divergence in the perceived need for support in digitalization between micro and medium-sized enterprises (
p = 0.04;
p ≤ 0.05).
6. Conclusions
SMEs’ digitalization is characterized by distinct attributes, such as resource constraints, limited IT expertise, and a unique organizational culture, distinguishing them from large companies. Understanding these particularities is essential to addressing their specific challenges and support needs when adopting diverse digital technologies. Each technology comes with its own complexities and knowledge prerequisites, requiring tailored strategies for SMEs based on their size and resource capacity.
The literature supports the hypothesis that there exist significant disparities in the challenges faced by different-sized companies during the digitalization process. This underscores the importance of empirically testing this hypothesis to provide specific insights into the nature of these differences among micro, small, medium, and large companies within the digitalization context. Recent research further emphasizes the importance of acknowledging and accommodating the distinct support requirements of micro, small, medium, and large companies throughout digitalization. The evidence aligns closely with hypothesis H2, indicating substantial differences in the support needs of these four categories. Empirical validation of this hypothesis offers valuable insights into the precise nature of these distinctions, enabling policymakers and supportive environment organizations to allocate resources effectively and provide support mechanisms to the diverse needs of companies along the digitalization spectrum.
Our study contributes valuable insights into the digitalization landscape of SMEs in Slovenia. It not only underlines the widespread use of established digital technologies but also highlights the diverse outcomes of digitization efforts. It also provides insights into the significant challenges and support needs faced by companies on this transformational journey. The comparative analysis across different company sizes underlines the importance of recognizing the differences in challenges and support requirements associated with company size. These findings serve as an important navigational guide for policymakers, industry stakeholders, and SMEs as they navigate the complex territory of digital transformation.
Our study aligns with a significant body of literature concerning the challenges and support needs of SMEs in their digitalization efforts. The literature review section highlighted the transformative nature of digitalization in various sectors, emphasizing the pivotal role of SMEs in driving economic growth and innovation, consistent with previous research [
17]. In terms of digital technologies adopted by SMEs, our findings corroborate earlier studies that indicate SMEs’ increasing use of social media, digital marketing, and online platforms to enhance competitiveness [
18,
19,
20]. Similarly, our study supports previous research highlighting the importance of cloud computing and data analytics in improving SMEs’ operational efficiency and competitiveness [
27,
28,
29]. Additionally, our findings align with the role of digital marketing and social media in enhancing customer engagement and loyalty for SMEs, consistent with prior studies [
30,
31,
32]. The findings resonate with prior research that has identified a fundamental challenge for SMEs—the lack of financial resources—as the most pressing need [
40,
41]. This consistency underscores the ongoing significance of this issue for small businesses as they navigate the complexities of digitalization. Small businesses, which typically operate with limited financial means, often find themselves at a disadvantage when attempting to invest in advanced digital technologies.
Where our study diverges from existing research is in the specific challenges and support needs identified for different company sizes during digitalization. Although the challenges related to the lack of financial resources and suitable employees due to overwork have been acknowledged in prior studies [
39,
42], our research goes further to reveal significant variations in these challenges across different company sizes. This nuanced understanding is crucial for tailoring support mechanisms effectively, addressing the unique needs of each category of companies. Moreover, our study highlights the importance of technological solutions in addressing the challenges SMEs face during digitalization. Although previous research has recognized the general challenges faced by SMEs, our study delves into the specifics of which technologies are predominantly used by companies and how they relate to the challenges faced. For example, our findings indicate that companies predominantly use widely accepted technologies like websites and tools for team support, suggesting that these technologies are instrumental in addressing certain challenges.
What is notable from the results is that companies rated all of the listed support areas as above average, indicating a broad and multifaceted need for support across various dimensions of digitalization. Although financial support is paramount, the companies also expressed a need for assistance during the actual implementation process. This suggests that they require not only the means to fund their digitalization initiatives but also guidance and expertise to effectively execute these projects.
Moreover, the study highlights the importance of knowledge and skills in managing digitalization projects and utilizing digital and technological solutions. The need for support extends beyond financial aspects and encompasses building the necessary competencies to harness the full potential of digitalization. This aligns with the broader understanding that successful digital transformation is not solely about financial investments but also about acquiring the expertise to make the most of these investments [
29]. However, we acknowledge the limitations of our study, which focused on small companies. This limitation narrows the broad interpretation of digitalization challenges across companies of different sizes, with a predominant focus on size-related differences. Further research should examine sector-specific nuances and analyze companies of specific sizes to gain a more precise understanding of digitalization challenges. In addition, the research was conducted as a one-time cross-sectional analysis within the framework of the Slovenian Entrepreneurship Observatory project in 2022. Although external validity was enhanced through random and stratified sampling and the use of generalizable variables, the focus was specific. However, these limitations are not considered obstacles but rather opportunities for future research to further the understanding of digital transformation and its effects on SMEs. To address this limitation, the analysis could be extended to different countries and regions, enabling the exploration of long-term digitalization trends by analyzing data from various time periods. Analyzing how SMEs in various countries manage the challenges and support requirements of digitalization can offer valuable cross-cultural perspectives and enhance our overall comprehension of the global digitalization landscape.
To improve the reliability of the findings, future studies should consider introducing measurable criteria to evaluate actual versus perceived needs and challenges. The use of advanced statistical methods, potentially combined with ANOVA, will enhance the result validation, particularly when multiple dependent variables (MANOVA) are present. A comprehensive understanding of the subject matter should be achieved by integrating qualitative insights with quantitative approaches. To ensure a constantly evolving understanding of the subject, conducting longitudinal studies is imperative. Such studies facilitate the monitoring of changes in necessities and challenges, as well as the assessment of the continual effectiveness of support interventions, thus providing a constantly developing viewpoint on companies’ digitalization.