Author Contributions
Formal analysis, M.R.S.; Investigation, M.R.S.; Methodology, A.N.H.; Supervision, A.N.H.; Validation, P.H.P.; Writing—original draft, M.R.S.; Writing—review & editing, A.N.H. and P.H.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was funded by Hibah Publikasi Terindeks Internasional (PUTI) Q2 2020 at Universitas Indonesia, grant number NKB-4071/UN2.RST/HKP.05.00/2020.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not Applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not Applicable.
Data Availability Statement
The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.
References
- Macintosh, A. Characterizing e-participation in policy-making. In Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Big Island, HI, USA, 5–8 January 2004; pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- Medaglia, R. eParticipation research: Moving characterization forward (2006–2011). Gov. Inf. Q. 2012, 29, 346–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Susha, I.; Grönlund, Å. eParticipation research: Systematizing the field. Gov. Inf. Q. 2012, 29, 373–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naranjo Zolotov, M.; Oliveira, T.; Casteleyn, S. E-participation adoption models research in the last 17 years: A weight and meta-analytical review. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2018, 81, 350–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kelly Garrett, R. Protest in an Information Society: A review of literature on social movements and new ICTs. Inf. Commun. Soc. 2006, 9, 202–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kollmann, T.; Kayser, I. A Comprehensive Approach to Citizen Engagement in e-Democracy. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on e-Government-ICEG, Guangzhou, China, 7–9 May 2010; pp. 54–62. [Google Scholar]
- Manoharan, A.; Holzer, M. E-Governance and Civic Engagement: Factors and Determinants of E-Democracy; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2011; pp. 1–655. [Google Scholar]
- Staerklé, C. Political Psychology. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015; ISBN 9780080970875. [Google Scholar]
- Adler, R.P.; Goggin, J. What Do We Mean By “Civic Engagement”? J. Transform. Educ. 2005, 3, 236–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- United Nations. United Nations e-Government Survey 2016; United Nations: Geneva, Switzerland, 2016; ISBN 9211231744. [Google Scholar]
- Van Den Bergh, J.; Viaene, S. Key challenges for the smart city: Turning ambition into reality. In Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Kauai, HI, USA, 5–8 January 2015; Volume 2015, pp. 2385–2394. [Google Scholar]
- Kogan, N.; Lee, K.J. Exploratory Research on the Success Factors and Challenges of Smart City Projects. Asia Pac. J. Inf. Syst. 2014, 24, 141–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Robby, M.F. Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Penggunaan Aplikasi Qlue. Bachelor’s Thesis, Universitas Islam Negri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, Kota Tangerang Selatan, Indonesia, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Nurhidayati, D. Does Digital Public Service Complaint Promote Accountability? A Comparative Analysis of Upik Yogyakarta and Qlue Jakarta. Policy Gov. Rev. 2019, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tampubolon, L.P.D. Pemeringkatan E-Government Indonesia (PEGI) dan Pemanfaatan Teknologi Informasi di DKI Jakarta. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2016, 8, 1121–1132. [Google Scholar]
- Reza, I.F.; Azmi, I.F. COMPARISON OF TECHNOLOGY, HUMAN RESOURCES, AND INSTITUTIONAL RESOURCES PERSPECTIVES: CASES OF JAKARTA SMART CITY. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Eviron. Sci. 2021, 717, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
- Didik Madyatmadja, E.; Abdurachman, E.; Gaol, F.L.; Pudjianto, B.W.; Hapsara, M. Potential Impact of Social Media to Support Government Services in Jakarta Smart City. In Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Information Management and Technology, Jakarta, Indonesia, 3–5 September 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Yanuaria, T.; Katjong, K. Public Services in Health through Hospitals. Papua Law J. 2019, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rose, J.; Sæbø, Ø. Establishing political deliberation systems: Key problems. In Proceedings of the 16th European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2008, Galway, Ireland, 9–11 June 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Parasuraman, A.; Zeithaml, V.A.; Malhotra, A. E-S-QUAL: A Multiple-Item Scale for Assessing Electronic Service Quality. J. Serv. Res. 2005, 7, 213–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, S. Local issues discussion forums in comparative perspective: Whose voices are heard? Innov. Eur. J. Soc. Sci. 2008, 21, 371–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harter, J.; Asplund, J.; Flemming, J.H. HumanSigma: A Meta-Analysis the Relationship between Employee Engagement, Customer Engagement, and Financial Performance. Gall. Bus. J. 2004, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- Pura, M. Linking perceived value and loyalty in location-based mobile services. Manag. Serv. Qual. 2005, 15, 509–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, Y.H.; Kim, D.J.; Wachter, K. A study of mobile user engagement (MoEN): Engagement motivations, perceived value, satisfaction, and continued engagement intention. Decis. Support Syst. 2013, 56, 361–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eggert, A.; Ulaga, W. Customer perceived value: A substitute for satisfaction in business markets? J. Bus. Ind. Mark. 2002, 17, 107–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fishbein, M.; Ajzen, I. Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behaviour: An Introduction to Theory and Research; Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA, USA, 1975. [Google Scholar]
- Dalton, R.J. Citizenship norms and the expansion of political participation. Polit. Stud. 2008, 56, 76–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hooghe, M.; Oser, J. The rise of engaged citizenship: The evolution of citizenship norms among adolescents in 21 countries between 1999 and 2009. Int. J. Comp. Sociol. 2015, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Inglehart, R.; Welzel, C. Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Scheidegger, R.; Staerklé, C. Political trust and distrust in Switzerland: A normative analysis. Swiss Polit. Sci. Rev. 2011, 17, 164–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Shepherd, H.R. The Structure of Perception: How Networks Shape Ideas of Norms. Sociol. Forum 2017, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kwon, H.K. Associations, civic norms, and democracy: Revisiting the Italian case. Theory Soc. 2004, 33, 135–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pattie, C.; Johnston, R. Personal mobilisation, civic norms and political participation. Geoforum 2013, 45, 178–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 1991, 50, 179–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Phang, C.W.E.I.; Kankanhalli, A. A Framework of ICT Exploitation for E-Participation Initiatives. Commun. ACM 2008, 51, 128–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verba, S.; Schlozman, K.L.; Brady, H.E. Rational action and political activity. J. Polit. 2000, 12, 243–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verba, S.; Schlozman, K.L.; Brady, H.E.; Shapiro, R.Y.; Verba, S.; Schlozman, K.L.; Brady, H.E. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
- Boone, H.N.J.; Boone, D.A. Analyzing Likert Data Likert-Type Versus Likert Scales. J. Ext. 2012, 50, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- De Oliveira, M.J.; Huertas, M.K.Z.; Lin, Z. Factors driving young users’ engagement with Facebook: Evidence from Brazil. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2016, 54, 54–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bell, E.; Bryman, A. The ethics of management research: An exploratory content analysis. Br. J. Manag. 2007, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F.; Hult, G.T.M.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling; SAGE Publications, Inc.: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2014; ISBN 978-1-4522-1744-4. [Google Scholar]
- Peng, D.X.; Lai, F. Using partial least squares in operations management research: A practical guideline and summary of past research. J. Oper. Manag. 2012, 30, 467–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet. J. Mark. Theory Pract. 2011, 19, 139–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kock, N.; Hadaya, P. Minimum sample size estimation in PLS-SEM: The inverse square root and gamma-exponential methods. Inf. Syst. J. 2018, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chin, W.W. The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Mod. Methods Bus. Res. 1998, 295, 295–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chin, W.W. How to Write Up and Report PLS Analyses. In Handbook of Partial Least Squares; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Cohen, J. Statistical Power for the Social Sciences; Laurence Erlbaum and Associates: Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 1988. [Google Scholar]
- Henseler, J.; Ringle, C.M.; Sinkovics, R.R. The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In New Challenges to International Marketing; Emerald Group Publishing Limited: Bingley, UK, 2009; pp. 277–319. [Google Scholar]
- Lehner, F.; Haas, N. Knowledge Management Success Factors–Proposal of an Empirical Research. Electron. J. Knowl. Manag. 2010, 8, 79–90. [Google Scholar]
- Hair, J.F.; Risher, J.J.; Sarstedt, M.; Ringle, C.M. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. Eur. Bus. Rev. 2019, 31, 2–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johnston, R.J.; Pattie, C.J. Towards an Understanding of Turnout at British General Elections: Voluntary and Involuntary Abstention in 1992. Parliam. Aff. 2012, 50, 280–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
| Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).