Next Article in Journal
Mobile Applications for Training Plan Using Android Devices: A Systematic Review and a Taxonomy Proposal
Next Article in Special Issue
How Much Space Is Required? Effect of Distance, Content, and Color on External Human–Machine Interface Size
Previous Article in Journal
Real-Time Tweet Analytics Using Hybrid Hashtags on Twitter Big Data Streams
Previous Article in Special Issue
Methodological Approach towards Evaluating the Effects of Non-Driving Related Tasks during Partially Automated Driving
Open AccessArticle

Sleep Inertia Countermeasures in Automated Driving: A Concept of Cognitive Stimulation

1
Würzburg Institute for Traffic Sciences; 97209 Veitshöchheim, Germany
2
Hyundai Motor Europe Technical Center GmbH; 60547 Rüsselsheim, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Information 2020, 11(7), 342; https://doi.org/10.3390/info11070342
Received: 26 May 2020 / Revised: 26 June 2020 / Accepted: 28 June 2020 / Published: 30 June 2020
When highly automated driving is realized, the role of the driver will change dramatically. Drivers will even be able to sleep during the drive. However, when awaking from sleep, drivers often experience sleep inertia, meaning they are feeling groggy and are impaired in their driving performance―which can be an issue with the concept of dual-mode vehicles that allow both manual and automated driving. Proactive methods to avoid sleep inertia like the widely applied ‘NASA nap’ are not immediately practicable in automated driving. Therefore, a reactive countermeasure, the sleep inertia counter-procedure for drivers (SICD), has been developed with the aim to activate and motivate the driver as well as to measure the driver’s alertness level. The SICD is evaluated in a study with N = 21 drivers in a level highly automation driving simulator. The SICD was able to activate the driver after sleep and was perceived as “assisting” by the drivers. It was not capable of measuring the driver’s alertness level. The interpretation of the findings is limited due to a lack of a comparative baseline condition. Future research is needed on direct comparisons of different countermeasures to sleep inertia that are effective and accepted by drivers. View Full-Text
Keywords: highly automated driving; sleep; sleep inertia; HMI design highly automated driving; sleep; sleep inertia; HMI design
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Wörle, J.; Kenntner-Mabiala, R.; Metz, B.; Fritzsch, S.; Purucker, C.; Befelein, D.; Prill, A. Sleep Inertia Countermeasures in Automated Driving: A Concept of Cognitive Stimulation. Information 2020, 11, 342.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop