Next Article in Journal
The Effects of a Predictive HMI and Different Transition Frequencies on Acceptance, Workload, Usability, and Gaze Behavior during Urban Automated Driving
Next Article in Special Issue
Coreference Resolution: Toward End-to-End and Cross-Lingual Systems
Previous Article in Journal
Cross-Generation Analysis of e-Book Consumers’ Preferences—A Prerequisite for Effective Management of Public Library
Previous Article in Special Issue
Formal Ontologies in Information Systems Development: A Systematic Review
Review

Still Minding the Gap? Reflecting on Transitions between Concepts of Information in Varied Domains

Centre for Information Science, City, University of London, Northampton Square, London EC1V 0HB, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Information 2020, 11(2), 71; https://doi.org/10.3390/info11020071
Received: 28 December 2019 / Revised: 23 January 2020 / Accepted: 25 January 2020 / Published: 29 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 10th Anniversary of Information—Emerging Research Challenges)
This conceptual paper, a contribution to the tenth anniversary Special Issue of Information, gives a cross-disciplinary review of general and unified theories of information. A selective literature review is used to update a 2013 article on bridging the gaps between conceptions of information in different domains, including material from the physical and biological sciences, from the humanities and social sciences including library and information science, and from philosophy. A variety of approaches and theories are reviewed, including those of Brenner, Brier, Burgin and Wu, Capurro, Cárdenas-García and Ireland, Hidalgo, Hofkirchner, Kolchinsky and Wolpert, Floridi, Mingers and Standing, Popper, and Stonier. The gaps between disciplinary views of information remain, although there has been progress, and increasing interest, in bridging them. The solution is likely to be either a general theory of sufficient flexibility to cope with multiple meanings of information, or multiple and distinct theories for different domains, but with a complementary nature, and ideally boundary spanning concepts. View Full-Text
Keywords: information theory; entropy; review; general theories of information; unified theories of information; philosophy of information; library and information science information theory; entropy; review; general theories of information; unified theories of information; philosophy of information; library and information science
MDPI and ACS Style

Bawden, D.; Robinson, L. Still Minding the Gap? Reflecting on Transitions between Concepts of Information in Varied Domains. Information 2020, 11, 71. https://doi.org/10.3390/info11020071

AMA Style

Bawden D, Robinson L. Still Minding the Gap? Reflecting on Transitions between Concepts of Information in Varied Domains. Information. 2020; 11(2):71. https://doi.org/10.3390/info11020071

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bawden, David, and Lyn Robinson. 2020. "Still Minding the Gap? Reflecting on Transitions between Concepts of Information in Varied Domains" Information 11, no. 2: 71. https://doi.org/10.3390/info11020071

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop