Next Article in Journal
Perceptions and Misperceptions of Smartphone Use: Applying the Social Norms Approach
Previous Article in Journal
Survey of Neural Text Representation Models
Open AccessArticle

Making the Case for a P2P Personal Health Record

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Information 2020, 11(11), 512; https://doi.org/10.3390/info11110512
Received: 23 August 2020 / Revised: 28 September 2020 / Accepted: 24 October 2020 / Published: 31 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Information Applications)
Improved health care services can benefit from a more seamless exchange of medical information between patients and health care providers. This exchange is especially important considering the increasing trends in mobility, comorbidity and outbreaks. However, current Electronic Health Records (EHR) tend to be institution-centric, often leaving the medical information of the patient fragmented and more importantly inaccessible to the patient for sharing with other health providers in a timely manner. Nearly a decade ago, several client–server models for personal health records (PHR) were proposed. The aim of these previous PHRs was to address data fragmentation issues. However, these models were not widely adopted by patients. This paper discusses the need for a new PHR model that can enhance the patient experience by making medical services more accessible. The aims of the proposed model are to (1) help patients maintain a complete lifelong health record, (2) facilitate timely communication and data sharing with health care providers from multiple institutions and (3) promote integration with advanced third-party services (e.g., risk prediction for chronic diseases) that require access to the patient’s health data. The proposed model is based on a Peer-to-Peer (P2P) network as opposed to the client–server architecture of the previous PHR models. This architecture consists of a central index server that manages the network and acts as a mediator, a peer client for patients and providers that allows them to manage health records and connect to the network, and a service client that enables third-party providers to offer services to the patients. This distributed architecture is essential since it promotes ownership of the health record by the patient instead of the health care institution. Moreover, it allows the patient to subscribe to an extended range of personalized e-health services. View Full-Text
Keywords: personal health record; peer-to-peer; service oriented architecture; Bayesian networks personal health record; peer-to-peer; service oriented architecture; Bayesian networks
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Horne, W.C.; Ben Miled, Z. Making the Case for a P2P Personal Health Record. Information 2020, 11, 512. https://doi.org/10.3390/info11110512

AMA Style

Horne WC, Ben Miled Z. Making the Case for a P2P Personal Health Record. Information. 2020; 11(11):512. https://doi.org/10.3390/info11110512

Chicago/Turabian Style

Horne, William C.; Ben Miled, Zina. 2020. "Making the Case for a P2P Personal Health Record" Information 11, no. 11: 512. https://doi.org/10.3390/info11110512

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop