Next Article in Journal
Blind Queries Applied to JSON Document Stores
Previous Article in Journal
Special Issue “Wearable Augmented and Mixed Reality Applications”
Previous Article in Special Issue
Human Activity Recognition for Production and Logistics—A Systematic Literature Review
Open AccessArticle

A Feature Selection and Classification Method for Activity Recognition Based on an Inertial Sensing Unit

1
Tianjin Key Laboratory of Electronic Materials Devices, School of Electronics and Information Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China
2
National Laboratory of Radar Signal Processing, Xidian University, Xi’an 710071, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Information 2019, 10(10), 290; https://doi.org/10.3390/info10100290
Received: 4 August 2019 / Revised: 14 September 2019 / Accepted: 15 September 2019 / Published: 21 September 2019
The purpose of activity recognition is to identify activities through a series of observations of the experimenter’s behavior and the environmental conditions. In this study, through feature selection algorithms, we researched the effects of a large number of features on human activity recognition (HAR) assisted by an inertial measurement unit (IMU), and applied them to smartphones of the future. In the research process, we considered 585 features (calculated from tri-axial accelerometer and tri-axial gyroscope data). We comprehensively analyzed the features of signals and classification methods. Three feature selection algorithms were considered, and the combination effect between the features was used to select a feature set with a significant effect on the classification of the activity, which reduced the complexity of the classifier and improved the classification accuracy. We used five classification methods (support vector machine [SVM], decision tree, linear regression, Gaussian process, and threshold selection) to verify the classification accuracy. The activity recognition method we proposed could recognize six basic activities (BAs) (standing, going upstairs, going downstairs, walking, lying, and sitting) and postural transitions (PTs) (stand-to-sit, sit-to-stand, stand-to-lie, lie-to-stand, sit-to-lie, and lie-to-sit), with an average accuracy of 96.4%. View Full-Text
Keywords: human activity recognition; inertial sensor; feature selection; combined effect human activity recognition; inertial sensor; feature selection; combined effect
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Fan, S.; Jia, Y.; Jia, C. A Feature Selection and Classification Method for Activity Recognition Based on an Inertial Sensing Unit. Information 2019, 10, 290.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop