The Italian University Habilitation and the Challenge of Increasing the Representation of Women in Academia
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Data
2.2. Statistical Analysis
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Results
3.2. Discussion
4. Conclusions
- faculty appointments based on creativity and originality, rather than publication numbers [31];
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Ceci, S.J.; Williams, W.M. Understanding current causes of women’s underrepresentation in science. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 3157–3162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- O’Brien, K.R.; Hapgood, K.P. The academic jungle: Ecosystem modelling reveals why women are driven out of research. Oikos 2012, 121, 999–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adamo, S.A. Attrition of women in the biological sciences: Workload, motherhood, and other explanations revisited. BioScience 2013, 63, 43–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rees, T. Mainstreaming gender equality in science in the European Union: The ETAN report. Gend. Educ. 2001, 13, 243–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neugebauer, K.M. Keeping tabs on the women: Life scientists in Europe. PLoS Biol. 2006, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stamm, J. Women in science — Why networking matters. European Review 2010, 18, 121–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bryson, C. The consequences for women in the academic profession of the widespread use of fixed term contracts. Gend. Work Org. 2004, 11, 187–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ioannidou, E.; Rosania, A. Under-representation of women on dental journal editorial boards. PLoS One 2015, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Moss-Racusin, C.A.; Molenda, A.K.; Cramer, C.R. Can evidence impact attitudes? Public reactions to evidence of gender bias in STEM fields. Psychol. Women Quart. 2015, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ceci, S.J.; Ginther, D.K.; Kahn, S.; Williams, W.M. Women in science: The path to progress. Sci. Am. Mind 2015, 26, 62–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- O’Connor, P. Understanding success: A case study of gendered change in the professoriate. J. High. Educ. Policy Manag. 2014, 36, 212–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stroude, A.; Bellier-Teichmann, T.; Cantero, O.; Dasoki, N.; Kaeser, L.; Ronca, M.; Morin, D. Mentoring for women starting a PhD: A “free zone” into academic identity. Int. J. Mentoring Coaching Educ. 2015, 4, 37–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van den Brink, M.; Brouns, M.; Waslander, S. Does excellence have a gender? A national research study on recruitment and selection procedures for professorial appointments in The Netherlands. Empl. Relat. 2006, 28, 523–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carvalho, T.; Santiago, R. New challenges for women seeking an academic career: The hiring process in Portuguese higher education institutions. J. High. Educ. Policy Manag. 2010, 32, 239–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bagilhole, B.; White, K. Generation and Gender in Academia; Palgrave Macmillan: UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Bagilhole, B.; White, K. Gender, Power and Management: A Cross Cultural Analysis of Higher Education; Palgrave Macmillan: UK, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Morley, L. Women and Higher Education Leadership: Absences and Aspirations; Leadership Foundation: London, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Morley, L. Lost leaders: Women in the global academy. High. Educ. Res. Dev. 2014, 33, 114–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bianco, M.L. Effetti della riforma dei concorsi universitari su carriere accademiche e dinamiche di genere. Polis 2002, 3, 417–444. (In Italian) [Google Scholar]
- She Figures 2012. Available online: http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/she-figures-2012_en.pdf (accessed on 5 March 2015).
- Balleer, A.; Gomez-Salvador, R.; Turunen, J. Labour force participation across Europe: A cohort-based analysis. Empir. Econ. 2014, 46, 1385–1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Solera, C.; Bettio, F. Women’s continuous careers in Italy: The education and public sector divide. Popul. Rev. 2013, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guetto, R. Structural and Cultural Determinants of Fertility and Female Labour Market Participation in Italy and Europe. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Trento, Trento, Italy, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Lissoni, F.; Mairesse, J.; Montobbio, F.; Pezzoni, M. Scientific productivity and academic promotion: A study on French and Italian physicists. Ind. Corp. Change 2011, 20, 253–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pezzoni, M.; Sterzi, V.; Lissoni, F. Career progress in centralized academic systems: Social capital and institutions in France and Italy. Res. Policy 2012, 41, 704–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fraumeni, B.M. Report of the committee on the status of women in the economics profession 2010. Am. Econ. Rev. 2011, 101, 731–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Larivière, V.; Ni, C.Q.; Gingras, Y.; Cronin, B.; Sugimoto, C.R. Global gender disparities in science. Nature 2013, 504, 211–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Paul-Hus, A.; Bouvier, R.L.; Ni, C.; Sugimoto, C.R.; Pislyakov, V.; Larivière, V. Forty years of gender disparities in Russian science: A historical bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics 2015, 102, 1541–1553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, L.-F. Why aren’t women sticking with science in Taiwan? Kaohsiung J. Med. Sci. 2010, 26, S28–S34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fohlmeister, J.; Helling, Ch. Career situation of female astronomers in Germany. Astronomische Nachrichten 2012, 333, 280–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lawrence, P.A. Men, women, and ghosts in science. PLoS Biology 2006, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bagla, P. Indian government offers helping hand to women scientists. Science 2008, 319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Cheveigné, S. The career paths of women (and men) in French research. Soc. Stud. Sci. 2009, 39, 113–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hill, C.; Corbett, C.; St. Rose, A. Why so few? In Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics; American Association of University Women: Washington, DC, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- The Difficulties of Gender Equality Governance at Austrian Universities. A Problem of Competing Institutional Logics? Available online: http://genderinacademia.sabanciuniv.edu/sites/genderinacademia.sabanciuniv.edu/files/birgit_sauer.pdf (accessed on 5 March 2015).
- Carr, P.L.; Gunn, C.M.; Kaplan, S.A.; Raj, A.; Freund, K.M. Inadequate progress for women in academic medicine: Findings from the national faculty study. J. Women’s Health. in press.
- Hopkins, N. Reflecting on fifty years of progress for women in science. DNA Cell Biol. 2015, 34, 159–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Draugalis, J.R.; Plaza, C.M.; Taylor, D.A.; Meyer, S.M. The status of women in US academic pharmacy. Am. J. Pharm. Educ. 2014, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mackenzie, B. The “leaky pipeline”: Examining and addressing the loss of women at consecutive career stages in marine engineering, science and technology. In Maritime Women: Global Leadership; Kitada, M., Williams, E., Loloma, L., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2015; pp. 69–81. [Google Scholar]
- Tomizawa, Y. Gender gap in medicine: Only one woman councilor in the Japan surgical society. Tohoku J. Exp. Med. 2015, 235, 97–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Groeneveld, S.; Tijdens, K.; van Kleef, D. Gender differences in academic careers: Evidence for a Dutch university from personnel data 1990–2006. Equal. Divers. Incl. Int. J. 2012, 31, 646–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shaw, A.K.; Stanton, D.E. Leaks in the pipeline: Separating demographic inertia from ongoing gender differences in academia. Proc. Royal Soc. 2012, 279, 3736–3741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Howe-Walsh, L.; Turnbull, S. Barriers to women leaders in academia: Tales from science and technology. Stud. High. Educ. in press.
- Kessel, C. Understanding underrepresentation: Women in mathematics and other fields. Math. Intell. 2014, 36, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- D’Amico, R.; Vermigli, P.; Canetto, S.S. Publication productivity and career advancement by female and male psychology faculty: The case of Italy. J. Divers. High. Educ. 2011, 4, 175–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Magnavita, N. Is there a gender gap in Italian radiology? A cross-sectional study. Eur. J. Radiol. 2013, 82, 502–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baxter, B.K.; Gunde-Cimerman, N.; Oren, A. Salty sisters: The women of halophiles. Front. Microbiol. 2014, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Morton, M.J.; Bristol, M.B.; Atherton, P.H.; Schwab, C.W.; Sonnad, S.S. Improving the recruitment and hiring process for women faculty. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2008, 206, 1210–1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bosquet, C.; Combes, P.-P.; Garcia-Penalosa, C. Gender and Promotions: Evidence from Academic Economists in France; LIEPP Working Paper n 29; Laboratoire interdisciplinaire d’évaluation des politiques publiques: Paris, France, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- De Paola, M.; Scoppa, V. Gender Discrimination and Evaluators’ Gender: Evidence from the Italian Academy; Working Paper n. 06; Dipartimento di Economia e Statistica, Università della Calabria: Cosenza, Italy, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Moss-Racusin, C.A.; Dovidio, J.F.; Brescoll, V.L.; Graham, M.J.; Handelsman, J. Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 16474–16479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Casadevall, A.; Handelsman, J. The presence of female conveners correlates with a higher proportion of female speakers at scientific symposia. mBio 2014, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Do Gender Quotas Pass the Test? Evidence from Academic Evaluations in Italy. Available online: http://www.lem.sssup.it/WPLem/files/2014-14.pdf (accessed on 5 March 2015).
- Baccini, A.; Barabesi, L.; Cioni, M.; Pisani, C. Crossing the hurdle: The determinants of individual scientific performance. Scientometrics 2014, 101, 2035–2062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reuben, E.; Sapienza, P.; Zingales, L. How stereotypes impair women’s careers in science. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 4403–4408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- McGuire, K.L.; Primack, R.B.; Losos, E.C. Dramatic improvements and persistent challenges for women ecologists. BioScience 2012, 62, 189–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Danell, R.; Hjerm, M. Career prospects for female university researchers have not improved. Scientometrics 2013, 94, 999–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pautasso, M. Focusing on publication quality would benefit all researchers. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2013, 28, 318–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Monroe, K.R.; Choi, J.; Howell, E.; Lampros-Monroe, C.; Trejo, C.; Perez, V. Gender equality in the ivory tower, and how best to achieve it. Political Sci. Politics 2014, 47, 418–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Penny, M.; Jeffries, R.; Grant, J.; Davies, S.C. Women and academic medicine: A review of the evidence on female representation. J. Royal Soc. Med. 2014, 107, 259–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van den Brink, M.; Stobbe, L. The support paradox: Overcoming dilemmas in gender equality programs. Scand. J. Manag. 2014, 30, 163–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Isbell, L.A.; Young, T.P.; Harcourt, A.H. Stag parties linger: Continued gender bias in a female-rich scientific discipline. PLoS One 2012, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Addessi, E.; Borgi, M.; Palagi, E. Is primatology an equal-opportunity discipline? PLoS One 2012, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Abramo, G.; D’Angelo, C.A.; Murgia, G. Gender differences in research collaboration. J. Informetr. 2013, 7, 811–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heijstra, T.; Bjarnason, T.; Rafnsdóttir, G.L. Predictors of gender inequalities in the rank of full professor. Scand. J. Educ. Res. in press.
- Cain, C.L.; Leahey, E. Cultural correlates of gender integration in science. Gend. Work Org. 2014, 21, 516–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Apel, R.; Leicht-Scholten, C.; Wolffram, A. Changing the face of STEM: the example of computer science in Germany. In GIEE 2011: Gender and Interdisciplinary Education for Engineers; Béraud, A., Godfroy, A.-S., Michel, J., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2012; pp. 421–437. [Google Scholar]
- Curriculare Vorschläge zur. Erhöhung des Frauenanteils in der Informatik. Available online: http://mod.iig.uni-freiburg.de/cms/fileadmin/publikationen/curriculuminf.pdf (accessed on 5 March 2015).
- Pell, A.N. Fixing the leaky pipeline: women scientists in academia. J. Anim. Sci. 1996, 74, 2843–2848. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Karukstis, K.K.; Gourley, B.L.; Wright, L.L.; Rossi, M. Mentoring strategies to recruit and advance women in science and engineering. J. Chem. Educ. 2010, 87, 355–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thomas, N.; Bystydzienski, J.; Desai, A. Changing institutional culture through peer mentoring of women STEM faculty. Innov. High. Educ. in press.
- Bowler, S. Try not to work too hard. A&G News Views Astron. Geophys. 2010, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mavriplis, C.; Heller, R.; Beil, C.; Dam, K.; Yassinskaya, N.; Shaw, M.; Sorensen, C. Mind the gap: Women in STEM career breaks. J. Technol. Manag. Innov. 2010, 5, 140–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perry, K. Daphne Jackson Fellowships offer returners the chance to re-establish a research profile after a career break. Endocr. Abstr. 2013, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Greene, J.; Lewis, P.; Richmond, G.; Stockard, J. Addressing gender equity in the physical sciences: Replications of a workshop designed to change the views of department chairs. J. Women Minorities Sci. Eng. 2011, 17, 97–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Greene, J.; Lewis, P.A.; Richmond, G.L.; Stockard, J. Changing the chairs: Impact of workshop activities in assisting chemistry department chairs in achieving racial and ethnic diversity. J. Chem. Educ. 2011, 88, 721–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McClelland, S.I.; Holland, K.J. You, me, or her. Leaders’ perceptions of responsibility for increasing gender diversity in STEM departments. Psychol. Women Quart. in press.
- Donald, A.; Harvey, P.H.; McLean, A.R. Athena SWAN awards: Bridging the gender gap in UK science. Nature 2011, 478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Royal Society of Edinburgh. Tapping All Our Talents, Women in Science, Engineering, Technology and Mathematics; A Strategy for Scotland; Royal Society of Edinburgh: Edinburgh, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Cheung, A. Rewards help institutions focus on gender inequality. New Sci. 2014, 221, 56–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jones, C.S.; Urban, M.C. Promise and pitfalls of a gender-blind faculty search. BioScience 2013, 63, 611–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, C.M.; Reissing, E.D.; Dobson, D. Work-life balance for early career Canadian psychologists in professional programs. Can. Psychol. 2009, 50, 74–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siller, H.; Bader, A.; Waldenberger-Steidl, B.; Hochleitner, M. Female and male physicians in academic medicine: Is work-life balance still an issue? In Paths to Career and Success for Women in Science; Thege, B., Popescu-Willigmann, S., Pioch, R., Badri-Höher, S., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2014; pp. 191–206. [Google Scholar]
- Machado-Taylor, M.L.; White, K.; Gouveia, O. Job satisfaction of academics: Does gender matter? High. Educ. Policy 2014, 27, 363–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bodewits, K.; Gramlich, P. Infrastructure, confidence and network: motherhood as a scientist in Germany. In Paths to Career and Success for Women in Science; Thege, B., Popescu-Willigmann, S., Pioch, R., Badri-Höher, S., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2014; pp. 289–303. [Google Scholar]
- Jagsi, R.; Tarbell, N.J.; Henault, L.E.; Chang, Y.; Hylek, E.M. The representation of women on the editorial boards of major medical journals: A 35-year perspective. Arch. Int. Med. 2008, 168, 544–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amrein, K.; Langmann, A.; Fahrleitner-Pammer, A.; Pieber, T.R.; Zollner-Schwetz, I. Women underrepresented on editorial boards of 60 major medical journals. Gend. Med. 2011, 8, 378–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Van den Brink, M. Scouting for talent: Appointment practices of women professors in academic medicine. Soc. Sci. Med. 2011, 72, 2033–2040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schroeder, J.; Dugdale, H.L.; Radersma, R.; Hinsch, M.; Buehler, D.M.; Saul, J.; Porter, L.; Liker, A.; de Cauwer, I.; Jonhnson, P.J.; et al. Fewer invited talks by women in evolutionary biology symposia. J. Evolut. Biol. 2013, 26, 2063–2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pettorelli, N.; Evans, D.M.; Garner, T.W.J.; Katzner, T.; Gompper, M.E.; Altwegg, R.; Branch, T.A.; Johnson, J.A.; Acevedo-Whitehouse, K.; DaVolls, L.; Rantanen, E.; Gordon, I.J. Addressing gender imbalances in Animal Conservation. Anim. Conserv. 2013, 16, 131–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leslie, S.-J.; Cimpian, A.; Meyer, M.; Freeland, E. Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines. Science 2015, 347, 262–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sessoli, R. Italian research at a turning point: An opportunity that cannot be missed. Angewandte Chemie Int. Edit. 2015, 54, 1374–1375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Docenza Universitaria: Un’intera Generazione è Tagliata Fuori. Available online: http://italians.corriere.it/2015/02/04/31530/ (accessed on 5 March 2015).
- Sánchez de Madariaga, I. Advancing gender equality in research and innovation in Europe and beyond: COST Network genderSTE. J. Res. Gend. Stud. 2013, 2013, 131–143. [Google Scholar]
© 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Pautasso, M. The Italian University Habilitation and the Challenge of Increasing the Representation of Women in Academia. Challenges 2015, 6, 26-41. https://doi.org/10.3390/challe6010026
Pautasso M. The Italian University Habilitation and the Challenge of Increasing the Representation of Women in Academia. Challenges. 2015; 6(1):26-41. https://doi.org/10.3390/challe6010026
Chicago/Turabian StylePautasso, Marco. 2015. "The Italian University Habilitation and the Challenge of Increasing the Representation of Women in Academia" Challenges 6, no. 1: 26-41. https://doi.org/10.3390/challe6010026