Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
A Collaborative Research Exploration of Pollutant Mixtures and Adverse Birth Outcomes by Using Innovative Spatial Data Mining Methods: The DoMiNO Project
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Multiomics and Systems Biology Are Needed to Unravel the Complex Origins of Chronic Disease
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessReview
Challenges 2019, 10(1), 24; https://doi.org/10.3390/challe10010024

Philanthrocapitalism: Promoting Global Health but Failing Planetary Health

1
National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra 0200, Australia
2
Health Research Institute, University of Canberra, Bruce ACT 2617, Australia
3
College of Arts, Humanities & Social Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA 5042, Australia
Received: 30 January 2019 / Revised: 17 March 2019 / Accepted: 19 March 2019 / Published: 23 March 2019
  |  
PDF [349 KB, uploaded 25 March 2019]

Abstract

Focusing on the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) as a case study, this paper explores the relationship between philanthrocapitalism, economic history, and global and planetary health. The Wellcome Trust is also briefly discussed, chiefly in the context of planetary health. The paper argues that in the last 45 years there has been an increased preference for market-based approaches, often called neoliberalism, particularly in the U.S. and its allies. This has generated greater inequality in many high-income settings and weakened the norm of taxation. This has provided a setting in which philanthrocapitalism has flourished, including the BMGF. The latter has in turn become an important actor for global health, partially balancing the adverse consequences of neoliberalism. Planetary health is here defined as the interaction between global health and global environmental change, including to the climate and other elements of the Earth System. Although the Wellcome Trust has recently made funds available for ecological health research, it continues to invest in fossil fuels. The Gates Foundation provide no or minimal grants for ecological or planetary health but appear to have recently substantially divested from fossil fuels, for unclear reasons. The paper concludes that these large philanthrocapitalist organizations partly compensate for the decline in attention to global health driven by market-preferring solutions, but remain insufficiently proactive in the face of the great dangers associated with declining planetary health. View Full-Text
Keywords: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation; capitalism; climate change; disinvestment; economic history; effective altruism; global health; health systems; malaria; metrics; neoliberalism; philanthrocapitalism; philanthropy, planetary health; vaccines; Wellcome Trust Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation; capitalism; climate change; disinvestment; economic history; effective altruism; global health; health systems; malaria; metrics; neoliberalism; philanthrocapitalism; philanthropy, planetary health; vaccines; Wellcome Trust
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Butler, C.D. Philanthrocapitalism: Promoting Global Health but Failing Planetary Health. Challenges 2019, 10, 24.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Challenges EISSN 2078-1547 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top