You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
by
  • Un-Hey Kim

Reviewer 1: Anonymous Reviewer 2: Anonymous

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This contribution is very interesting. The introduction mentions multiple kinds of Christianity the conclusion references only Protestantism. Perhaps balance or reframe. 

Author Response

Thank you for your reading and good comments.

I agree with your suggest about recognition of diversity of christian and will make my article revised:

 

  • I think it is more proper to change “Protestant traditions” to Christian traditions in the conclusion of my article.

 

 

Reviewer 2 Report

Good, thoughtful, and timely article. I think it could be improved with a bit more clarity in the introduction and conclusion. More precision in setting up what this study is and why it is needed would strengthen the article.

Author Response

Thank you for your reading and good comments.

I appreciate your comment about clarity of goal and reason for my article in the introduction and conclusion. I think that my article will be improved if I revise with your suggestion.

 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf