Next Article in Journal
Christian Ethics and Ecologies of Violence
Previous Article in Journal
Introduction to the Special Issue on “Religions in African-American Popular Culture”
Previous Article in Special Issue
Centrality of Religiosity, Schizotypy, and Human Values: The Impact of Religious Affiliation
Open AccessArticle

Brazilian Validation of Centrality of Religiosity Scale (CRS-10BR and CRS-5BR)

1
Postgraduate Program in Theology and Postgraduate Program in Bioethics, Pontifical Catholic University of Paraná, Curitiba 80215-901, Brazil
2
Department of Theology, Fidelis College, Curitiba-PR 81670-340, Brazil
3
Postgraduate Program in Administration, Pontifical Catholic University of Paraná, Curitiba 80215-901, Brazil
4
Institute for Empirical Research on Religion, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
5
Postgraduate Program in Theology, Pontifical Catholic University of Paraná, Curitiba 80215-901, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Religions 2019, 10(9), 508; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel10090508
Received: 10 July 2019 / Revised: 24 August 2019 / Accepted: 27 August 2019 / Published: 30 August 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research with the Centrality of Religiosity Scale (CRS))
The centrality of religiosity scale (CRS), available in three versions (with 5, 10 and 15 items), is a measuring instrument that identifies the central importance of religiosity in the psychological construction and in the behavior of an individual. According to the literature, five components together express the centrality of religion in life: Public practice, private practice, ideological, intellectual, and religious experience. These components are the ground on which religious constructs are formed and activated. For the validation of the scale in the Brazilian cultural context, two versions were tested (CRS-10BR and CRS-5BR) with data collected from a general population (N = 687). Exploratory Factor Analysis (N = 334) resulted in a five-factor solution congruent to CRS-10BR. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (N = 353) demonstrated that a five-factor solution (Intellect, Ideology, Private Practice, Public Practice and Religious Experience) indicated better fit indexes than the single-factor solution of five items (CRS-5BR). Thus, CRS-10BR is recommended to capture CRS full construct. However, the CRS-5BR version can be considered suitable for use in the Brazilian population when the context is demanding simpler and faster data collection. View Full-Text
Keywords: centrality of religiosity scale; validation; religion; spirituality; psychology of religion; Brazil centrality of religiosity scale; validation; religion; spirituality; psychology of religion; Brazil
MDPI and ACS Style

Esperandio, M.R.G.; August, H.; Viacava, J.J.C.; Huber, S.; Fernandes, M.L. Brazilian Validation of Centrality of Religiosity Scale (CRS-10BR and CRS-5BR). Religions 2019, 10, 508.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop