Next Article in Journal
Hope in Exile: In Conversation with Ezekiel
Previous Article in Journal
Four Religious Education Teachers: Four Retrospective Career Trajectories
Previous Article in Special Issue
Birds and Beasts in the Zhuangzi, Fables Interpreted by Guo Xiang and Cheng Xuanying
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle

Animals in the Public Debate: Welfare, Rights, and Conservationism in India

National Centre for Scientific Research, 75016 Paris, France
Religions 2019, 10(8), 475; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel10080475
Received: 16 June 2019 / Revised: 25 July 2019 / Accepted: 5 August 2019 / Published: 13 August 2019
  |  
PDF [317 KB, uploaded 13 August 2019]

Abstract

This paper proposes a survey of the many ways in which people look at and deal with animals in contemporary India. On the basis of ethnographic research and of multiple written sources (judgments, newspapers, websites, legal files, activist pamphlets, etc.), I present some of the actors involved in the animal debate—animal activists, environmental lawyers, judges, and hunter-conservationists—who adopt different, though sometimes interconnected, approaches to animals. Some of them look at animals as victims that need to be rescued and treated in the field, others fight for animals in Parliament or in Court so that they can be entitled to certain rights, others are concerned with the issue of species survival, where the interest of the group prevails on the protection of individual animals. In the context of a predominantly secularist background of the people engaged in such debates, I also examine the role that religion may, in certain cases, play for some of them: whether as a way of constructing a Hindu or Buddhist cultural or political identity, or as a strategic argument in a legal battle in order to obtain public attention. Lastly, I raise the question of the role played by animals themselves in these different situations—as intellectual principles to be fought for (or to be voiced) in their absence, or as real individuals to interact with and whose encounter may produce different kinds of sometimes conflicting emotions. View Full-Text
Keywords: animal welfare; animal rights; conservationism; hunters; Hinduism; India; court cases; Tibetan diaspora animal welfare; animal rights; conservationism; hunters; Hinduism; India; court cases; Tibetan diaspora
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Berti, D. Animals in the Public Debate: Welfare, Rights, and Conservationism in India. Religions 2019, 10, 475.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Religions EISSN 2077-1444 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert Logo copyright Steve Bridenbaugh/UUA
Back to Top