Next Article in Journal
Analysis of Wind-Induced Vibration of a Spoke-Wise Cable–Membrane Structure
Previous Article in Journal
Investigation of Optimal Coupling Velocities of the Sample and Sheath Flows for Hydrodynamic Focusing
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Research on Risk Evaluation and Dynamic Escape Path Planning Algorithm Based on Real-Time Spread of Ship Comprehensive Fire

J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2020, 8(8), 602; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8080602
by Jian Ji 1, Zhihao Ma 2, Jiajun He 2, Yingjun Xu 1 and Zhiqiang Liu 2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2020, 8(8), 602; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8080602
Submission received: 9 July 2020 / Revised: 7 August 2020 / Accepted: 7 August 2020 / Published: 12 August 2020

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The introduction/abstract is written in a strange manner. Both shall be clarified and make it more relevant. The literature review is skipped and must be improved. Ch 2.1,2.2,2.3 are not concluded anyhow. Ch3 title "Comprehensive fire real-time situation risk assessment based on fuzzy neural network" is not proper - hard to understand what's going on here. 3.2 and its subchapters shall be joined into one. In 3.2.3 additional subchapter division is added - it shall be simplified. In ch 3.2.5 there is no intro and no explanation. Fig 12 Loop is not properly presented. It's unknown to which block it will follow if YES condition is met. Fig 15 (in the description shall be chain, not chan) very big mess in arrows and junctions! Shall be corrected. All equations shall be corrected so they meet standards and shall be justified. conclusions are presented in a very simplified manner and shall be expanded. Only 11 references are a bit too few. 

 

Author Response

Thank you very much for your suggestions, I have revised the content of the article,Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors proposed a path planning algorithm based on an improvement of A*. This type of application of this algorithm is not new. However, this paper could be one more study in this area, mostly because of its algorithm improvement. I have some recommendations for improvements:
1) There are some typos to be fixed;
2) Include a short description and reference for the BIM model mentioned at line 42;
3) The methodology is not clear. I suggest the authors include a section for this purpose;
4) The authors should mention similar studies and compare the results;
5) Include limitations of this work in the conclusion.

Author Response

Thank you very much for your suggestions, I have revised the content of the article,Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors have made the improvements suggested, and the final result is satisfactory.

Author Response

非常感谢您的建议,我添加了一些参考资料并修改了一些内容。

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop