Next Article in Journal
Assessing the Unreliability of Systems during the Early Operation Period of a Ship—A Case Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Strength Performance of an Eccentric Jacket Substructure
Previous Article in Journal
A Numerical Investigation on the Flooding Process of Multiple Compartments Based on the Volume of Fluid Method
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Prediction of Grouting Penetration Height Along the Shaft of Base Grouted Pile

Department of mechanics, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2019, 7(7), 212; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse7070212
Submission received: 27 May 2019 / Revised: 6 July 2019 / Accepted: 7 July 2019 / Published: 10 July 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Computer-Aided Marine Structures’ Design)

Abstract

:
Post-pressure grouting is an effective method to improve bearing capacity of ordinary bored cast-in-situ piles. The migration of the grout along the pile side is regarded as an important mechanism responsible for the improvement of the pile capacity. Research into the penetration height of the grout is of great important in evaluating the behavior of base grouted piles. In this paper, a prediction method of grouting penetration height along the shaft of the base grouted pile was proposed. Considering the balance and losses of the grout pressure during grouting, an iterative procedure was given to determine the penetration height of the grout in layered soils. Field test results were also provided to indicate the validity of the proposed method.

1. Introduction

Post-pressure grouting is an effective method to improve bearing capacity of bored piles. It has been a common practice when the piles are designed to carry a significant end-bearing load. With the help of a high-pressure pump, the prepared grout is injected into the soil layer at the level of the pile base, compacting, permeating, and fracturing the surrounding soils to strengthen them. In the meantime, the grout also penetrates upward a certain distance along the shaft–soil interface. The migration of the grout along the pile shaft is regarded as an important mechanism responsible for the improvement of the pile capacity [1,2]. Research into the penetration height of the grout is of great important in evaluating the behavior of grouted piles.
The improvement effect of base grouting on the side friction has been proved by extensive field monitoring data, which show that the post-grouted piles achieve higher side friction than the non-grouted ones [2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. In routine practice, the penetration height of the grout from the pile base is regarded as the reinforcement height of the side friction [9]. Even though the penetration height of the grout plays a significant role in predicting the side friction of the grouted piles, there is limited study of the penetration height. The determination of the parameter was mostly based on personal experience. Observations in the field have shown that cement grout penetrates upward along the sides of the drilled pile over a distance of about 10 to 15 m [10]. Occasionally, the grout can penetrate upward more than 70 m to the ground surface [9]. The Chinese design codes provide a recommended height of 12 m for practical purposes, which is a very conservative estimate. Considering the difference in engineering geological conditions, entirely empirical method will introduce significant uncertainties. Therefore, it is desirable to develop a well-established rational design methodology for the prediction of grouting penetration height.
In this paper, a prediction method of grouting penetration height along the shaft of base grouted pile was proposed. Considering the balance and losses of the grout pressure during grouting, an iterative procedure was given to determine the penetration height of the grout in layered soils. Field test results were also provided to indicate the validity of the proposed method.

2. Penetration Criterion

With the help of a high-pressure pump, the prepared cement grout was injected into the soil layer near the pile base through grout pipes connected to the reinforcement bars of the pile during construction. At the initial stage of grouting, the grout permeates into the soil pores or pushes the soil outward forming a grout bodies with a smooth flow of the grout. With the clogging up of pore channels or densification of the soil, grouting pressure increases gradually until it builds up to a threshold fracturing pressure and the grout intrudes into a weakness plane between the pile and soil to develop grout-filled fractures.
The threshold fracturing pressure that must be exceeded before penetration begins cannot be obtained accurately. It depends upon various parameters linked to the grout characteristics and the properties of surrounding soil around the pile base [11,12,13,14]. In general cases, it is larger than the lateral normal stress acted on the pile side at the level of pile base [15]. Additionally, as the grout will intrude into the pile–soil interface more easily than fracture the surrounding soils, the threshold fracturing pressure should be less than the soil fracture pressure.
Under the grouting pressure at the pile base, the grout will travel alongside the shaft of the pile until a pressure balance achieved or grouting terminated. If the pressure gradient is not sufficient enough to overcome the friction from the flowing grout, the flow will stop. A cement layer can be formed around the pile shaft after curing, as shown in Figure 1.

3. Grouting Penetration Model

To evaluate the grouting penetration height along the shaft of the pile, a model is proposed to study the flow properties of the grout. Unlike the fracture grouting in the soil, the grout penetrates along a certain path, i.e., the pile–soil interface [13,16].
Cement grout can be described as a Bingham fluid [17,18]. The rheological properties can be described as
τ = τ s + μ p γ
where τ is the shear stress, τ s is static shear stress, μ p is the viscosity of the grout, and γ is the shear rate of the grout.
Grout flows upward between the pile–soil interfaces under the grouting pressure. As shown in Figure 2, a small annular element, with length of dL and width of 2u was taken from the grout to consider the equilibrium conditions. An equation can be obtained as
π [ ( r 1 + r 2 2 + u ) 2 ( r 1 + r 2 2 u ) 2 ] ( P + d P + γ g d L P ) = τ [ 2 π ( r 1 + r 2 2 + u ) + 2 π ( r 1 + r 2 2 u ) ] d L
where r 1 is the radius of the pile. r 2 is the radius of the pile hole squeezed by the grout. P is the grouting pressure, which changes with d P along the height. γ g is the unit weight of the cement grout.
Substituting Equation (1) into Equation (2),
d v d u = ( 1 μ p ) [ ( d P d L + γ g ) u + τ s ] .
For Bingham fluids, it behaves as a rigid body if the shear stress is less than the yield stress ( | u | u p ). As shown in Figure 2, the stress exceeds the yield stress only for
| u | u p = τ s d P / d L + γ g .
There is no flow if | u | is greater than ( r 2 r 1 ) / 2 . Integration of Equation (5), with v = 0 at | u | = ( r 2 r 1 ) / 2 ,
v = 1 μ p { 1 2 ( d P d L + γ g ) [ u 2 ( r 2 r 1 2 ) 2 ] + τ s ( u r 2 r 1 2 ) }   ( u p | u | ( r 2 r 1 ) / 2 ) ,
v p = 1 μ p { 1 2 ( d P d L + γ g ) [ u p 2 ( r 2 r 1 2 ) 2 ] + τ s ( u p r 2 r 1 2 ) }   ( 0 | u | u p ) .
Integration of Equation (5) to obtain the flow rate, gives
Q = r 2 r 1 2 u p 2 π ( r 1 + r 2 2 u ) v d u + u p r 2 r 1 2 2 π ( r 1 + r 2 2 + u ) v d u + v p π [ ( r 1 + r 2 2 + u p ) 2 ( r 1 + r 2 2 u p ) 2 ] .
It can be simplified as
Q = π ( r 1 + r 2 ) 12 μ p [ τ s ( d P d L + γ g ) ( r 2 r 1 ) ] [ 2 τ s ( d P / d L ) + γ g + ( r 2 r 1 ) ] 2 .
The driving pressure at the front of the propagating grout decreases gradually with the increases in the grout flow resistance. When the driving pressure is less than the lateral normal stress acted on the pile side, the grout cannot penetrate further into pile-soil interface. Penetration is stopped due to equilibrium between the driving and resistance forces. The minimum driving pressure for penetration can be approximated by the lateral normal stress acted on the pile side as follows,
P min = K 0 γ m ( H H g )
where K 0 is the lateral earth pressure coefficient. γ m is the mean unit weight of the soil layer above the penetration height. H is the pile length. H g is the penetration height of the grout.
The pressure gradient of the flowing grout between the pile and the soil can be written as
d P d L = P min P e H g
where P e is the grouting pressure at the pile base.
Substituting Equation (10) into Equation (8),
Q = π ( r 1 + r 2 ) 12 μ p [ τ s ( P min P e L g + γ g ) ( r 2 r 1 ) ] { 2 τ s [ ( P min P e ) / L g ) + γ g ] + ( r 2 r 1 ) } 2
The penetration height of the grout can be estimated through the Equation (11) if the grouting pressure at the pile base and the flow rate of the grout can be measured.
In practice, considering the surface of drilled pile was irregular due to the instability of the drill hole during construction, as schematically shown in Figure 3 [19]. The grout flows along a rough wall of tube plane, rather than an idealized smooth wall of tube plane as shown in Figure 2. The penetration height of the grout will decrease and a reduction factor k r should be applied for the calculated height using Equation (11) to account for the borehole roughness. The reduction factor can be defined as the ratio of the pile length to the measured mean length of borehole diameter profile curve of the pile (as shown in Figure 3).
k r = H L r
where L r is the mean length of borehole diameter profile curve of the pile.
Then, the penetration height of the grout can be corrected as
H g = k r H g .

4. Iterative Procedure of Grouting Penetration Height in Layered Soil

In practical engineering, the foundation soil is layered rather than homogeneous. The various modulus of the soil will result in the difference in thickness of the squeezed grout layer r 2 r 1 . In this respect, a procedure for the evaluation of the grouting penetration height in layered soil is proposed.
As shown in Figure 3, the grout layer around the pile can be divided into n elements according to the corresponding soil layer. Each element can be analyzed using the procedure outlined in the preceding section.
For element i, the thickness of the squeezed grout layer u t i ( r 2 r 1 in Figure 2) can be calculated by the elastic theory.
u ti = P a i P 0 i 2 G i r 1
P a i = P i P i 1 2
where P a i is the mean grout pressure for element i. P 0 i is the initial lateral soil pressure acted on the pile. G i is the shear modulus of the soil.
Equation (11) can be rewritten as follows for element i
Q i = π ( r 1 + r 2 i ) 12 μ p [ τ s ( P i 1 P i L i + γ g ) ( r 2 i r 1 ) ] { 2 τ s [ ( P i 1 P i ) / L i ) + γ g ] + ( r 2 i r 1 ) } 2
where L i is the length of the element i.
Considering the continuity of the grout pressure and combining the equations of the n elements, the grouting penetration height in layered soil can be evaluated using the following procedure (the flow chart was shown in Figure 4).
(1)
Divide the pile into n elements, and the length of each element is L i .
(2)
Assume the grout pressure at the top of the element n is P n 1 . Calculate the thickness of the grout layer element u t n using Equations (14) and (15).
(3)
Substitute P e and u t n into Equation (16) and calculate a new grout pressure P n 1 . If the new P n 1 is not equal to the assumed P n 1 , assign the new P n 1 to P n 1 . Then, repeat step (2) and (3) until P n 1 and P n 1 are equal.
(4)
Compare the previously obtained P n 1 with P min . If P n 1 is less than the P min , assign the P min to P n 1 and calculate a new L n using Equation (16). Otherwise, proceed to calculation of the next element.
(5)
Repeat steps (2) to (4) until the obtained P i 1 is less than the P min . Correct L i with the mentioned method of step (4). The theoretical grouting penetration height can be calculated by the method of summing up the length of the element from n to i. H g = m = i n L m .
(6)
Correct H g with reduction factor k r and obtain the actual grouting penetration height H g .

5. Case Study

In order to examine the validity of the proposed procedure, the results of predictions were compared with the measurements obtained from field investigation. The field site was located in Hangzhou, China. The pile, with a diameter of 0.8 m and a length of 40 m, was grouted after its construction. The water-to-cement ratio of the grout is 0.6. The grouting pressure at the pump is about 3 MPa and the grouting pressure at the pile base measured by the pressure gage is about 1.2 MPa. The grout injection rate is about 0.003 m3/s. The measured reduction factor of borehole profile k r is 0.52. The detailed soil properties are listed in Table 1. The values of the parameters used in this case study are summarized in Table 2.
The proposed method was adopted to predict the grouting penetration height in this case. Based on the injection parameter and soil properties, the calculated grouting penetration height is 31 m. To evaluate the practical applicability of the proposed method, field investigations were performed to examine the actual penetration height of the grout. The soil is excavated to permit visual inspection of penetration of the grout. The measured penetration height is shown in Table 3.
Note that exact penetration heights were not obtained for two piles. For pile No. 1, the grout can be seen to squeeze out from sides of the piles to the ground surface. The penetration height should be more than the length of the pile. For pile No. 5, cement layer were not detected within the excavation depth (8 m). It means that the grouting penetration height for pile No. 5 is less than 32 m.
An average height of 35.6 m was obtained by averaging the penetration height of the piles except pile No. 1 and pile No. 5. The predicted values were reasonably close to those measures with an under-prediction of about 10%. Even with the relatively low values, the proposed method provides an important reference to the design of the grouted piles. It can be applied to the engineering to give a conservative assessment of the grouting penetration height for the base grouted piles.

6. Discussion

It should be noted that the grout pressure at the pile base plays a decisive role in the calculation of grout penetration height. The grout pressure at the pile base is usually not equal to the pressure measured at the pump considering the friction losses in the pipes. A reduction factor, which ranges from 0.3 to 0.95, should be used to account for the pipe losses of the pressure [20]. To give an accurate evaluation of the penetration height, the grout pressure at the pile base should be measured by the pressure gage arranged below the pile base.
The grout migration is a complex process and depends on various factors. It is unavoidable that significant scatter in actual penetration height can be observed. Therefore, it is necessary to adopt conservative assessment for penetration height to ensure the reliable design of grouted piles. The penetration height predicted by this method should be discounted and provide sufficient safety margin.

7. Summary

In this paper, a prediction method of grouting penetration height along the shaft of base grouted pile was proposed. The grout was described as a Bingham fluid. Considering the equilibrium between the driving and resistance forces, the penetration height of the grout can be obtained by the established relationship between flow rate and pressure gradient. From a practical point, an iterative procedure was given to determine the penetration height of the grout in layered soils. In order to examine the validity of the proposed procedure, field investigations were performed to examine the actual penetration height of the grout. The measurements proved the reliability of the proposed method. Considering the uncertainty of grouting pressure losses and roughness of the pile borehole, it is necessary to adopt conservative assessment for penetration height to ensure the reliable design of grouted piles.

Author Contributions

Investigation and methodology, K.F.; Validation, T.Z.; Writing—review and editing, Y.T. and Y.Q.

Funding

This work was supported by the Taishan Scholar Talent Team Support Plan for Advantaged & Unique Discipline Areas. National Natural Science Foundation of China (51408345), Shandong Province Natural Science Fund (No. ZR2019QEE015). China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2016M590644).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ng, C.W.W.; Li, J.H.M.; Yau, T.L.Y. Behavior of large diameter floating bored piles in saprolitic soils. Soils Found. 2001, 41, 37–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhang, Z.M.; Yu, J.; Zhang, G.X.; Zhou, X.M. Test study on the characteristics of mudcakes and in situ soils around bored piles. Can. Geotech. J. 2009, 46, 241–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Thompson, P.A. Base and shaft grouted piles. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Geotech. Eng. 1996, 119, 186–192. [Google Scholar]
  4. Huang, S.G.; Gong, W.M. Study on effect of base grouting on shaft friction of overlength large diameter pile. Rock Soil Mech. 2006, 27, 711–716. [Google Scholar]
  5. Zhang, Z.M.; Zhang, Q.Q. Experimental study on mechanical properties of post-grouting compressive pile. Chin. J. Rock Mech. Eng. 2009, 28, 475–482. [Google Scholar]
  6. Barthelemy, H.C.; Martin, R.; Le Tirant, P.C.; Nauroy, J.F.; de Medeiros, J.C., Jr. Grouted driven piles: An economic and safe alternate for pile foundations. In Proceedings of the Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, TX, USA, 27–30 April 1987. [Google Scholar]
  7. Doherty, P.; Spagnoli, G.; Doherty, M. Laboratory investigations to assess the feasibility of employing a novel mixed-in-place offshore pile in calcareous deposits. Ships Offshore Struct. 2015, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ghazali, F.M.; Sotiropoulos, E.; Mansour, O.A. Large-diameter bored and grouted piles in marine sediments of the Red. Can. Geotech. J. 1988, 25, 826–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fang, K.; Zhang, Z.M.; Yang, Q.D. Response Evaluation of Axially Loaded Grouted Drilled Shaft. Mar. Georesour. Geotechnol. 2014, 32, 123–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. He, J. Experimental research on vertical bearing properties of base-grouting bored cast-in-place pile. Chin. J. Geotech. Eng. 2002, 24, 743–746. [Google Scholar]
  11. Panah, A.K.; Yanagisawa, E. Laboratory studies on hydraulic fracturing criteria in soil. Soils Found. 1989, 29, 14–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Andersen, K.H.; Rawlings, C.G.; Lunne, T.A.; By, T.H. Estimation of hydraulic fracture pressure in clay. Can. Geotech. J. 1994, 31, 817–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bezuijen, A.; Grotenhuis, R.T.; Van Tol, A.F.; Bosch, J.W.; Haasnoot, J.K. Analytical model for fracture grouting in sand. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. 2010, 137, 611–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Marchi, M.; Gottardi, G.; Soga, K. Fracturing pressure in clay. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. 2013, 140, 04013008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Massarsch, K.R. New aspects of soil fracturing in clay. J. Geotech. Eng. Div. 1978, 104, 1109–1123. [Google Scholar]
  16. Soga, K.; Au, S.K.A.; Jafari, M.R.; Bolton, M.D. Laboratory investigation of multiple grout injections into clay. Geotechnique 2004, 54, 81–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Axelsson, M.; Gustafson, G.; Fransson, A. Stop mechanism for cementitious grouts at different water-to-cement ratios. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2009, 24, 390–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mohammed, M.H.; Pusch, R.; Knutsson, S. Study of cement-grout penetration into fractures under static and oscillatory conditions. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2015, 45, 10–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fang, K.; Zhao, T.; Zhang, Y.; Qiu, Y.; Zhou, J. Rock cone penetration test under lateral confining pressure. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. 2019, 119, 149–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fang, K.; Zhang, Z.M.; Zhang, Q.Q.; Liu, X.W. Prestressing effect evaluation for a grouted shaft: A case study. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Geotech. Eng. 2014, 167, 253–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Formed cement layer around pile side.
Figure 1. Formed cement layer around pile side.
Jmse 07 00212 g001
Figure 2. Grouting penetration model.
Figure 2. Grouting penetration model.
Jmse 07 00212 g002
Figure 3. Schematic of grouting penetration in layered soil.
Figure 3. Schematic of grouting penetration in layered soil.
Jmse 07 00212 g003
Figure 4. Flow chart of the calculated procedure.
Figure 4. Flow chart of the calculated procedure.
Jmse 07 00212 g004
Table 1. Soil properties of the test site.
Table 1. Soil properties of the test site.
Type of Soil LayerLayer Thickness mUnit Weight kN/m3Compression Modulus MPaCohesion kPaFriction Angle °Coefficient of the Lateral Pressure
Fill4.517.57.9 0.40
Sandy silt2.918.611.512.526.70.40
Sandy silt2.818.811.811.728.80.41
Sandy silt2.318.810.810.828.30.41
Silty sand3.819.111.310.128.00.33
Silt clay7.117.33.316.35.00.56
Silty clay2.218.86.540.011.80.47
Silty clay2.819.27.035.113.40.46
Fine sand7.019.78.69.825.90.36
Gravel16.720
Table 2. Value of parameters used in this case study.
Table 2. Value of parameters used in this case study.
Pile Diameter r1 mPile Length H mGrout Unit Weight γg KN/m3Static Shear Stress τs PaGrouting Pressure Pe MPaGrout Injection Rate Q m3/sReduction Factor kr
0.84016.9121.20.0030.52
Table 3. Measured grouting penetration height.
Table 3. Measured grouting penetration height.
No.12345678AVG.
Height/m>4032.637.135.7<3233.936.038.335.6

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fang, K.; Zhao, T.; Tan, Y.; Qiu, Y. Prediction of Grouting Penetration Height Along the Shaft of Base Grouted Pile. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2019, 7, 212. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse7070212

AMA Style

Fang K, Zhao T, Tan Y, Qiu Y. Prediction of Grouting Penetration Height Along the Shaft of Base Grouted Pile. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2019; 7(7):212. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse7070212

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fang, Kai, Tongbin Zhao, Yunliang Tan, and Yue Qiu. 2019. "Prediction of Grouting Penetration Height Along the Shaft of Base Grouted Pile" Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 7, no. 7: 212. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse7070212

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop