# Influence of Propulsion Type on the Stratified Near Wake of an Axisymmetric Self-Propelled Body

^{1}

^{2}

^{*}

## Abstract

**:**

## 1. Introduction

## 2. Approach

#### 2.1. Governing Equations

#### 2.2. Kinetic and Potential Energy

#### 2.3. Actuator-Line Model

#### 2.4. Iowa Body

#### 2.5. Iowa Body Propeller

#### 2.6. Computational Mesh

#### 2.7. Numerical Methods

#### 2.8. Initial and Boundary Conditions

#### 2.9. Flow Field Analysis

#### 2.10. Flow Coefficients and Case Studies

## 3. Results

#### 3.1. Near-Wake Transition

#### 3.2. Velocity Profiles

#### 3.3. Velocity and Temperature Fields in the Mixed-Patch

#### 3.3.1. Velocity Field

#### 3.3.2. Temperature Field

#### 3.3.3. Comparison to a Perfectly-Mixed Temperature Field

#### 3.4. Potential and Kinetic Energy Evolution

## 4. Conclusions

## Author Contributions

## Acknowledgments

## Conflicts of Interest

## Abbreviations

AL | Actuator line |

DNS | Direct Numerical Simulation |

CRP | Contra-rotating propeller |

SOWFA | Simulator fOr Wind Farm Applications |

URANS | unsteady Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes |

## References

- Hyun, B.S. Measurements in the Flow Around a Marine Propeller at the Stern of an Axisymmetric Body. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
- Hyun, B.S.; Patel, V.C. Measurements in the flow around a marine propeller at the stern of an axisymmetric body. Exp. Fluids
**1991**, 11, 33–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Sirviente, A.; Patel, V.C. Wake of a self-propelled body, part 1: Momentumless wake. AIAA J.
**2000**, 38, 613–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Posa, A.; Balaras, E. A numerical investigation of the wake of an axisymmetric body with appendages. J. Fluid Mech.
**2016**, 792, 470–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Felli, M.; Camussi, R.; Di Felice, F. Mechanisms of evolution of the propeller wake in the transition and far fields. J. Fluid Mech.
**2011**, 682, 5–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Posa, A.; Balaras, E. Large-eddy simulations of a propelled submarine model. In Proceedings of the APS Division of Fluid Dynamics Meeting Abstracts, Boston, MA, USA, 22–24 November 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Posa, A.; Balaras, E. Large–eddy simulations of a notional submarine in towed and self–propelled configurations. Comput. Fluids
**2018**, 165, 116–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Lucca-Negro, O.; O’Doherty, T. Vortex breakdown: A review. Progress Energy Combust. Sci.
**2001**, 27, 431–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Sirviente, A.; Patel, V.C. Wake of a self–propelled body, part 2: Momentumless wake with swirl. AIAA J.
**2000**, 38, 620–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Esmaeilpour, M.; Martin, J.E.; Carrica, P.M. Near-field flow of submarines and ships advancing in a stable stratified fluid. Ocean Eng.
**2016**, 123, 75–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hassid, S. Collapse of turbulent wakes in stably stratified media. J. Hydronaut.
**1980**, 14, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Chernykh, G.; Voropayeva, O. Numerical modeling of momentumless turbulent wake dynamics in a linearly stratified medium. Comput. Fluids
**1999**, 28, 281–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Meunier, P.; Spedding, G.R. Stratified propelled wakes. J. Fluid Mech.
**2006**, 552, 229–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Brucker, K.A.; Sarkar, S. A comparative study of self–propelled and towed wakes in a stratified fluid. J. Fluid Mech.
**2010**, 652, 373–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Lin, J.; Pao, Y.H. Wakes in stratified fluids. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech.
**1979**, 11, 317–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Spedding, G. Wake signature detection. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech.
**2013**, 46, 273–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Pal, A.; de Stadler, M.B.; Sarkar, S. The spatial evolution of fluctuations in a self–propelled wake compared to a patch of turbulence. Phys. Fluids
**2013**, 25, 095106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Pal, A. Dynamics of Stratified Flow Past a Sphere: Simulations Using Temporal, Spatial and Body Inclusive Numerical Models; University of California: San Diego, CA, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Pal, A.; Sarkar, S. Effect of external turbulence on the evolution of a wake in stratified and unstratified environments. J. Fluid Mech.
**2015**, 772, 361–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - De Stadler, M.B.; Sarkar, S. Simulation of a propelled wake with moderate excess momentum in a stratified fluid. J. Fluid Mech.
**2012**, 692, 28–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Spedding, G. The evolution of initially turbulent bluff–body wakes at high internal Froude number. J. Fluid Mech.
**1997**, 337, 283–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Pal, A.; Sarkar, S.; Posa, A.; Balaras, E. Direct numerical simulation of stratified flow past a sphere at a subcritical reynolds number of 3700 and moderate froude number. J. Fluid Mech.
**2017**, 826, 5–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Naudascher, E. Flow in the wake of self–propelled bodies and related sources of turbulence. J. Fluid Mech.
**1965**, 22, 625–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Lin, J.; Pao, Y. Velocity and Density Measurements in the Turbulent Wake of a Propeller-Driven Slender Body in a Stratified Fluid; Flow Research Inc.: Middlesex, MA, USA, 1974. [Google Scholar]
- Schetz, J.; Jakubowski, A. Experimental studies of the turbulent wake behind self–propelled slender bodies. AIAA J.
**1975**, 13, 1568–1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Sanderse, B.; Pijl, S.; Koren, B. Review of computational fluid dynamics for wind turbine wake aerodynamics. Wind Energy
**2011**, 14, 799–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Jones, M.C.; Paterson, E.G. Evolution of the propeller near-wake and potential energy in a thermally- stratified environment. In Proceedings of the OCEANS 2016 MTS/IEEE Monterey, Monterey, CA, USA, 19–23 September 2016; pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- Jones, M.C.; Paterson, E.G. Influence of propulsion type on the near-wake evolution of kinetic and potential energy. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Marine Propulsors, Helsinki, Finland, 12–15 June 2017; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- Menter, F.R. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA J.
**1994**, 32, 1598–1605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Fofonoff, N.P.; Millard, R.C. Algorithms for computation of fundamental properties of seawater. UNESCO Tech. Pap. Mar. Sci.
**1983**, 44, 1–53. [Google Scholar] - Holliday, D.; McIntyre, M.E. On potential energy density in an incompressible, stratified fluid. J. Fluid Mech.
**1981**, 107, 221–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - NWTC Information Portal (SOWFA). Available online: https://nwtc.nrel.gov/SOWFA (accessed on 21 April 2016).
- Troldborg, N. Actuator Line Modeling of Wind Turbine Wakes. Ph.D. Thesis, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Martınez, L.A.; Leonardi, S.; Churchfield, M.J.; Moriarty, P.J. A comparison of actuator disk and actuator line wind turbine models and best practices for their use. In Proceedings of the 50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Nashville, TN, USA, 9–12 January 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Brockett, T. Minimum Pressure Envelopes for Modified Naca-66 Sections with Naca a = 0.8 Camber and Buships Type 1 and Type 2 Sections; Technical Report; DTIC Document: Fort Belvoir, VA, USA, 1966. [Google Scholar]
- cfMesh 1.1.1. Available online: http://www.cfmesh.com/ (accessed on 16 February 2016).
- Issa, R.I. Solution of the implicitly discretised fluid flow equations by operator-splitting. J. Comput. Phys.
**1986**, 62, 40–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Tennekes, H.; Lumley, J.L. A First Course in Turbulence; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1972. [Google Scholar]

**Figure 1.**Non-dimensional body force on mesh slice at propeller plane $|{f}_{p}|/\left({\rho}_{0}{R}_{p}\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}{\mathrm{rps}}^{2}\right)$ for the single-propeller case.

**Figure 4.**Flow visualization for x/L ≤ 1.5 using Q-criterion visualization non-dimensionalized as (L/U

_{0})

^{2}Q = 16.9 colored by U

_{x}/U

_{0}− 1 with vertical cutting plane through mesh.

**Figure 5.**Instantaneous (

**top**); and time-averaged (

**bottom**) velocity defect ${U}_{x}/{U}_{0}-1$ for the single propeller case.

**Figure 6.**Instantaneous (

**top**); and time-averaged (

**bottom**) velocity defect ${U}_{x}/{U}_{0}-1$ for the CRP case.

**Figure 7.**Circumferentially-averaged velocity defect ${U}_{x}/{U}_{0}-1$ profiles for each configuration at various distances downstream.

**Figure 8.**Circumferentially-averaged swirl velocity ${U}_{\theta}/{U}_{0}$ profiles for each configuration at various distances downstream.

**Figure 9.**Velocity defect ${U}_{x}/{U}_{0}-1$ profiles at $x/L=1.5$ for single propeller (

**a**) and CRP (

**b**) cases.

**Figure 10.**Swirl velocity ${U}_{\theta}/{U}_{0}$ profiles at $x/L=1.5$ for single propeller (

**a**) and CRP (

**b**) cases.

**Figure 15.**Integrated energy evolution downstream of the vehicle for each configuration, with x measured from the bow of the hull and ${x}^{\prime}$ measured from the stern.

Coefficient | Value | Coefficient | Value | Coefficient | Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|

${a}_{0}$ | $9.998425\times {10}^{2}$ | ${b}_{0}$ | $8.2449\times {10}^{-1}$ | ${c}_{0}$ | $-5.7247\times {10}^{-3}$ |

${a}_{1}$ | $6.793952\times {10}^{-2}$ | ${b}_{1}$ | $-4.0899\times {10}^{-3}$ | ${c}_{1}$ | $1.0227\times {10}^{-4}$ |

${a}_{2}$ | $-9.095290\times {10}^{-3}$ | ${b}_{2}$ | $7.6438\times {10}^{-5}$ | ${c}_{2}$ | $-1.6546\times {10}^{-6}$ |

${a}_{3}$ | $1.001685\times {10}^{-4}$ | ${b}_{3}$ | $-8.2467\times {10}^{-7}$ | ${d}_{0}$ | $4.8314\times {10}^{-4}$ |

${a}_{4}$ | $-1.120083\times {10}^{-6}$ | ${b}_{4}$ | $5.3875\times {10}^{-9}$ | ||

${a}_{5}$ | $6.536332\times {10}^{-9}$ |

Feature | Value |
---|---|

$L/D$ | 10.90 |

$D/{D}_{p}$ | 1.369 |

${D}_{p}/{D}_{h}$ | 6.266 |

Hub location | $0.9688<x/L<0.9832$ |

Propeller location | $x/L=0.9755$ |

Number of blades | 3 |

Propeller hydrofoil | NACA 66-Modified |

Mesh Feature | Value |
---|---|

Boundary layer cells | $>20$ |

Near-wall mesh spacing | ${y}^{+}<100$ |

Propulsor and wake cells/${D}_{p}$ | 100 |

Wake region extends to | $x/L=1.6$ |

Total number of cells | $2\times {10}^{7}$ |

Maximum aspect ratio | $\mathrm{AR}<170$ |

Maximum non-orthogonality | $<{45}^{\circ}$ |

Maximum skewness | $<0.8$ |

Configuration | J | ${\mathit{C}}_{\mathit{T}}$ | ${\mathit{C}}_{\mathit{T}}^{*}$ | ${\mathit{C}}_{\mathit{Q}}$ | ${\mathit{F}}_{\mathit{T}}/{\mathit{F}}_{\mathit{D}}$ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|

Single | 0.86 | 0.047 | 0.084 | 0.011 | 0.99 |

CRP (fore) | 0.90 | 0.024 | 0.041 | 0.0071 | 0.50 |

CRP (aft) | 0.86 | 0.023 | 0.041 | 0.0072 | 0.50 |

Jet | - | - | 0.082 | 0 | 1.07 |

© 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

## Share and Cite

**MDPI and ACS Style**

Jones, M.C.; Paterson, E.G. Influence of Propulsion Type on the Stratified Near Wake of an Axisymmetric Self-Propelled Body. *J. Mar. Sci. Eng.* **2018**, *6*, 46.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse6020046

**AMA Style**

Jones MC, Paterson EG. Influence of Propulsion Type on the Stratified Near Wake of an Axisymmetric Self-Propelled Body. *Journal of Marine Science and Engineering*. 2018; 6(2):46.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse6020046

**Chicago/Turabian Style**

Jones, Matthew C., and Eric G. Paterson. 2018. "Influence of Propulsion Type on the Stratified Near Wake of an Axisymmetric Self-Propelled Body" *Journal of Marine Science and Engineering* 6, no. 2: 46.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse6020046