Next Article in Journal
Analyses of Deepwater Pipeline Walking Under Cyclic Temperature and Pressure Loads
Previous Article in Journal
Seasonal Biochemical Regulation of Lipid Metabolism in Mediterranean Mullet Species
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Inversion of Absorption Coefficient Profile with SSP and Argo Salinity Model for Precise Backscatter Processing

1
College of Underwater Acoustic Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China
2
National Key Laboratory of Underwater Acoustic Technology, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China
3
Key Laboratory of Marine Information Acquisition and Security (Harbin Engineering University), Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Harbin 150001, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2026, 14(11), 1037; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse14111037
Submission received: 14 April 2026 / Revised: 29 May 2026 / Accepted: 29 May 2026 / Published: 31 May 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Ocean Engineering)

Abstract

Multibeam backscatter data are important for marine resource exploration and benthic habitat mapping. However, accurate estimation of absorption loss without concurrent CTD measurements can be challenging. This paper proposes an inversion method that combines a global Argo salinity model with sound speed profiles (SSPs). The method enables absorption loss correction using only SSP data, offering a potential engineering alternative that reduces the need for dedicated CTD casts and may support real-time processing. Salinity is interpolated from the Argo grid, temperature is inverted via empirical formula for sound speed, and the absorption coefficient is computed using the Francois–Garrison model. The method is evaluated using two open-access multibeam datasets from the NCEI: one from the Blake Plateau (depth 1050–1250 m, 26.5 kHz) and another from Johnston Atoll (depth 2000–5000 m, 28 kHz). Compared to concurrent CTD profiles, the maximum deviations observed are 0.3 ppt for salinity, 0.1 C for temperature, and 0.06 dB/km for absorption coefficient. The difference in absorption loss between the inversion and the CTD-based reference is within 0.1 dB. A precomputed lookup table indexed by incidence angle and one-way travel time is constructed for rapid estimation. In a test of 5196 swaths (432 beams per swath), the total interpolation time is 0.726 s. These results suggest that the proposed method provides a practical solution for absorption loss correction when CTD data are unavailable.
Keywords: multibeam echosounder; absorption coefficient profile; absorption loss; inversion and modeling multibeam echosounder; absorption coefficient profile; absorption loss; inversion and modeling

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, Z.; Li, T.; Zhou, T. Inversion of Absorption Coefficient Profile with SSP and Argo Salinity Model for Precise Backscatter Processing. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2026, 14, 1037. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse14111037

AMA Style

Zhang Z, Li T, Zhou T. Inversion of Absorption Coefficient Profile with SSP and Argo Salinity Model for Precise Backscatter Processing. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2026; 14(11):1037. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse14111037

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Ze, Tie Li, and Tian Zhou. 2026. "Inversion of Absorption Coefficient Profile with SSP and Argo Salinity Model for Precise Backscatter Processing" Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 14, no. 11: 1037. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse14111037

APA Style

Zhang, Z., Li, T., & Zhou, T. (2026). Inversion of Absorption Coefficient Profile with SSP and Argo Salinity Model for Precise Backscatter Processing. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 14(11), 1037. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse14111037

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop