This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessArticle
Uncertainty-Guided Prediction Horizon of Phase-Resolved Ocean Wave Forecasting Under Data Sparsity: Experimental and Numerical Evaluation
1
Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, University of Maine, 35 Flagstaff Road, Orono, ME 04469, USA
2
Mechanical Engineering Department, University of Maine, 35 Flagstaff Road, Orono, ME 04469, USA
3
Department of Ocean Engineering, University of Rhode Island, Narragansett, RI 02882, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2025, 13(7), 1250; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13071250 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 5 June 2025
/
Revised: 18 June 2025
/
Accepted: 25 June 2025
/
Published: 28 June 2025
Abstract
Accurate short-term wave forecasting is critical for the safe and efficient operation of marine structures that rely on real-time, phase-resolved ocean wave information for control and monitoring purposes (e.g., digital twins). These systems often depend on environmental sensors (e.g., waverider buoys, wave-sensing LIDAR). Challenges arise when upstream sensor data are missing, sparse, or phase-shifted due to drift. This study investigates the performance of two machine learning models, time-series dense encoder (TiDE) and long short-term memory (LSTM), for forecasting phase-resolved ocean surface elevations under varying degrees of data degradation. We introduce the -trimming algorithm, which adapts the prediction horizon based on uncertainty thresholds derived from historical forecasts. Numerical wave tank (NWT) and wave basin experiments are used to benchmark model performance under short- and long-term data masking, spatially coarse sensor grids, and upstream phase shifts. Results show under a 50% probability of upstream data loss, the -trimmed TiDE model achieves a 46% reduction in error at the most upstream target, compared to 22% for LSTM. Furthermore, phase misalignment in upstream data introduces a near-linear increase in forecast error. Under moderate model settings, a ±3 s misalignment increases the mean absolute error by approximately 0.5 m, while the same error is accumulated at ±4 s using the more conservative approach. These findings inform the design of resilient, uncertainty-aware wave forecasting systems suited for realistic offshore sensing environments.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Alkarem, Y.R.; Huguenard, K.; Kimball, R.W.; Grilli, S.T.
Uncertainty-Guided Prediction Horizon of Phase-Resolved Ocean Wave Forecasting Under Data Sparsity: Experimental and Numerical Evaluation. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2025, 13, 1250.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13071250
AMA Style
Alkarem YR, Huguenard K, Kimball RW, Grilli ST.
Uncertainty-Guided Prediction Horizon of Phase-Resolved Ocean Wave Forecasting Under Data Sparsity: Experimental and Numerical Evaluation. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2025; 13(7):1250.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13071250
Chicago/Turabian Style
Alkarem, Yuksel Rudy, Kimberly Huguenard, Richard W. Kimball, and Stephan T. Grilli.
2025. "Uncertainty-Guided Prediction Horizon of Phase-Resolved Ocean Wave Forecasting Under Data Sparsity: Experimental and Numerical Evaluation" Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 13, no. 7: 1250.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13071250
APA Style
Alkarem, Y. R., Huguenard, K., Kimball, R. W., & Grilli, S. T.
(2025). Uncertainty-Guided Prediction Horizon of Phase-Resolved Ocean Wave Forecasting Under Data Sparsity: Experimental and Numerical Evaluation. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 13(7), 1250.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13071250
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details
here.
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
For more information on the journal statistics, click
here.
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.