Next Article in Journal
A Review of Vibration Control Studies of Double-Layered Cylindrical Shells Under Transient Excitation in Water
Next Article in Special Issue
Characteristics and Evaluation of Living Shorelines: A Case Study from Fujian, China
Previous Article in Journal
Numerical Study on Ammonia Dispersion and Explosion Characteristics in Confined Space of Marine Fuel Preparation Room
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Distribution and Relationship of Radionuclides and Heavy Metal Concentrations in Marine Sediments from the Areas Surrounding the Daya Bay Power Plant, Southeast China

1
Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Marine Physical and Geological Processes, Xiamen 361005, China
2
Shanghai Nuclear Engineering Research & Design Institute Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200233, China
3
Third Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Xiamen 361005, China
4
School of Resources and Environmental Science, Quanzhou Normal University, Quanzhou 362000, China
5
Laboratory for Marine Geology, Qingdao Marine Science and Technology Center, Qingdao 266237, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
We would like to dedicate this paper to Dr. Binxin Zheng, who unfortunately passed away just before the paper was submitted to the journal. Dr. Zheng played an essential role in the research described here and he is greatly missed.
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2025, 13(7), 1237; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13071237
Submission received: 16 June 2025 / Revised: 24 June 2025 / Accepted: 25 June 2025 / Published: 27 June 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Coastal Geochemistry: The Processes of Water–Sediment Interaction)

Abstract

Radionuclides and heavy metals pose potential risks to marine ecosystems and human health. Daya Bay, the site of China’s first commercial nuclear power plant, has experienced significant anthropogenic impacts, yet the extent of radionuclide and heavy metal contamination remains unclear. Nineteen surface sediment samples were collected in January 2024 and analyzed for natural (210Pb, 228Th, 226Ra, 228Ra, and 40K) and anthropogenic (137Cs) radionuclides, heavy metals (Cu, Pb, Zn, Cd, Cr, Mn, Hg, and As), grain size, and total organic carbon (TOC). The surface sediments of Daya Bay were predominantly fine-grained, with TOC levels ranging from 0.41% to 1.83%, influenced significantly by riverine input from the Dan’ao River. Natural radionuclides exhibited distinct spatial patterns: 210Pb and 228Th activity levels were higher in fine-grained sediments, and correlated with TOC, indicating adsorption and sedimentation controls. In contrast, anthropogenic 137Cs activity was low and showed no significant impact from the nuclear power plant. Notably, the absence in the samples of key anthropogenic radionuclides typically associated with nuclear power plant operations further confirmed the negligible impact of the power plant on local sediment contamination. The results indicated that the baseline levels of both natural and anthropogenic radionuclides and heavy metals were predominantly influenced by natural processes and local anthropogenic activities rather than the operation of the nuclear power plant. This study establishes critical baselines for radioactivity and heavy metals in Daya Bay, underscoring effective pollution control measures and the resilience of local ecosystems despite anthropogenic pressures.

1. Introduction

Radionuclides and heavy metal elements are widely present in marine environments, accumulating through marine food chains and posing hazards to human health [1]. Based on their origins, radionuclides can be categorized into natural and anthropogenic types. “Natural radionuclides” refers to those produced during Earth’s formation and evolution and existing in the natural environment (e.g., 210Pb, 226Ra, and 40K), whereas anthropogenic radionuclides are generated by human activities. For instance, 137Cs primarily originates from atmospheric nuclear weapons tests, with additional contributions from nuclear accidents (such as the Chernobyl and Fukushima accidents) and discharge from nuclear waste processing facilities [2,3]. Depending on their sources and properties (e.g., particle-reactivity, half-life), different radionuclides can serve as indicators of various geological processes [4]. Examples include calculating sedimentation rates using vertical decay profiles of excess 210Pb in sediment cores [5]; tracing terrestrial sediment transport pathways across continental shelves using 137Cs [6,7]; and employing 7Be to identify newly deposited estuarine sediments while analyzing riverine versus marine influence ratios [8]. Notably, naturally occurring gamma radiation from radionuclides accounts for 85% of global annual ionizing radiation exposure [9,10], with prolonged contact potentially leading to health risks including various cancers. Similarly, due to their physiological toxicity, heavy metals constitute another critical marine pollutant threatening human health. The primary sources of heavy metals include natural rock weathering and anthropogenic activities (e.g., industrial/mining discharges), with subsequent adsorption onto particulate matter for transportation and sedimentation [11,12]. Upon entering marine systems, radionuclides and heavy metals from different sources can accumulate in marine organisms through sediment and water mediums and can eventually threaten human health through trophic transfer and biomagnification. The determination of radionuclide activity in sediments is a crucial component in assessing human exposure to background radiation, providing important information regarding health risks associated with natural radioactivity. Meanwhile, heavy metal concentrations serve as key indicators in the evaluation of the degree of marine environmental pollution. Therefore, investigating the activity levels of radionuclides and concentration characteristics of heavy metals in marine sediments not only offers critical insights for sedimentological process but also holds significant implications for the protection of marine life and, subsequently, human health.
The Daya Bay Nuclear Power Plant was China’s first commercial nuclear power plant, and has been in operation for over thirty years, since 1994. During the operation of the power plant, it has exerted impacts on the surrounding marine environment, especially the water environment, including changes in the local flow field, increases in the temperature at the discharge outlet, alterations in the geochemical characteristics of the water in the discharge area, and changes in the structure of the plankton community [13,14,15]. Moreover, the operation of the nuclear power plant also has certain impacts on the sediment characteristics of the surrounding sea areas; however, there is currently no systematic and comprehensive conclusion regarding the extent of these impacts. At present, the focus of pollution research on the sea areas surrounding the Daya Bay Nuclear Power Plant is mainly concentrated on the organic carbon and heavy metal pollution [16,17,18]. In comparison, the levels of radionuclides (both natural and anthropogenic) in the surrounding sediments and their relationship with heavy metals have not yet been fully clarified.
Therefore, this study focuses on the radioactivity level and heavy metal pollution in the marine sediments of Daya Bay, especially those near the power plant, aiming to clarify the spatial distribution of natural (210Pb, 228Th, 226Ra, 228Ra, and 40K) and anthropogenic (137Cs) radionuclides and heavy metals (Cu, Pb, Zn, Cd, Cr, Mn, Hg, and As) in surface marine sediments near the Daya Bay Power Plant, and relate these findings to the determinations of lithology, gran-size composition, and total organic carbon content. Finally, clarification of the relationship between radionuclides and heavy metals, as well as the extent to which they are affected by the operation of nuclear power plants, will be made. This study provides important references for pollution assessment and the formulation of comprehensive management policies in the marine areas surrounding nuclear power plants.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area and Sample Collection

Daya Bay is situated on the eastern coast of Guangdong Province, Southeastern China (Figure 1a), covering an area of approximately 650 km2. The water depth in most parts is <30 m, with an average depth of around 10 m. This semi-enclosed bay with limited water exchange has a water residence time of about 90 days [18,19]. The region has a typical subtropical monsoon climate, with an annual rainfall of 1827 mm, 80% of which occurs between May and August [20]. Daya Bay is characterized by an irregular semidiurnal tide with a narrow tidal range of 1.0–1.5 m. Flood tide in Daya Bay basically flows from the mouth to the top of the bay (south to north). There is only a small river, named the Dan’ao River, flowing into Daya Bay from the northwest of the bay (Figure 1b). Since the 1980s, the rapid development of marine aquaculture and the petrochemical industry in Daya Bay, along with the successive construction of two nuclear power plants (Daya Bay Power Plant and Ling’ao Power Plant, which began operation in 1994 and 2002, respectively), along with the accelerated process of urbanization, has exerted a substantial impact on the marine environment of the bay [12].
Nineteen surface sediment samples (uppermost 5 cm) were collected using a grab sampler near the Daya Bay power plants during 25−26 January 2024 (the stations are shown in Figure 1b). The samples were separately preserved to be used for grain size, total organic carbon (TOC), radionuclides, and heavy metals analysis.

2.2. Laboratory Sample Analyses

2.2.1. Grain Size and Total Organic Carbon (TOC) Analysis

The grain size of sediments was determined by a laser particle-size analyzer (Mastersizer 2000, Malvern Instruments, Ltd., Worcestershire, UK). About 0.5 g of fresh sediment was pretreated using 10 mL of a 30% H2O2 (AR, Xilong Scientific Co. Ltd., Shantou, China) solution to oxidize the organic matter, and then dispersed and homogenized using an ultrasonicator for 30 s. The measurement error of the instrument was within 3%. The grain size fractions were < 4 μm for clay, 4–63 μm for silt, and >63 μm for sand.
Before TOC measurement, the sediment was pretreated with 1.2 mol L−1 HCl (AR, Xilong Scientific Co. Ltd., Shantou, China) to remove inorganic carbon. The samples were dried at 60 °C after the excess acid had been removed. About 25–30 mg of carbonate-free samples were wrapped in a tin cup for TOC measurement using an Elemental Analyzer (EA, Integra 2, SerCon, Crewe, UK). The instruments were first run with three blank samples, and two standard samples were also run between every twelve field samples. The analytical accuracy was ±0.02% for TOC.

2.2.2. Radionuclides Measurement

High-resolution gamma-ray spectrometry was used to measure the radionuclides in the surface sediment. After being dried in an oven at 80 °C for 12 h, sediment samples were ground and sieved (100–150 mesh), and then packed into containers of identical height and sealed for 30 days, prior to radionuclide measurement using a high-purity germanium (HPGe) γ-spectrometer (Canberra-GR4021). By the time of measurement, the radionuclides in the samples had reached a relative secular equilibrium. A certified reference material for environmental radioactivity in river sediment (GBW08034a), prepared by the National Institute of Metrology of China, was used as the standard reference source to determine the full-energy peak efficiency. During sample measurement, decay correction and background subtraction were performed for all samples. Each sample was measured for 24 h in the HPGe γ-spectrometer. The specific activity of 210Pb was determined from the peak area at 46.5 keV. The specific activity of 226Ra was calculated using the peak areas of its progenies 214Bi (609.3 keV) and 214Pb (295.2 keV and 352.0 keV). The specific activity of excess 210Pb (210Pbex) was obtained by subtracting the activity of 226Ra from that of total 210Pb. The specific activity of 228Ra was calculated based on the peak areas of 228Ac (338.5 keV and 911.1 keV), while that of 228Th was determined using the average specific activities of 208Tl (583.2 keV) and 212Pb (238.6 keV). The specific activity of 7Be was determined using the peak area at 477 keV, with a detection limit of 5 Bq kg−1. The specific activity of 40K was calculated from the peak area at 1460.8 keV. The specific activity of 137Cs in the sediment samples was determined based on the peak at 661.5 keV.
The counting error was <10% for all radionuclides. The minimum detectable activity levels were 0.58 Bq kg−1 for 210Pb, 1.30 Bq kg−1 for 226Ra, 0.27 Bq kg−1 for 228Ra, 0.19 Bq kg−1 for 228Th, 5.0 Bq kg−1 for 7Be, 1.91 Bq kg−1 for 40K, and 0.41 Bq kg−1 for 137Cs, respectively.

2.2.3. Heavy Metals Measurement

Closed-container dissolution was used to digest the sediments prior to heavy metal measurement. Approximately 40 mg of dried and ground fine powders underwent digestion using 1 mL HF (GR/Merck, 40%, Boston, MA, USA) and 3 mL HNO3 (GR/Merck, 65%, Boston, MA, USA) in Teflon containers for 12 h at 180 °C. The samples were then removed and placed on an electrothermal board to evaporate the HF. The residue was solubilized by 1 mL HNO3 and 1 mL deionized water for 12 h at 150 °C. The Cu, Pb, Zn, Cd, Cr, Mn, and As contents were measured by ICP-MS (iCAPQ, Thermo, Waltham, MA, USA) and the Hg was measured using an atomic fluorescence spectrophotometer. The parallel samples were set up with an interval of five samples, and two blank samples and two standard samples (GBW07316, marine sediment) were set up for all samples to calibrate the results. The error for the parallel sample was less than 3%, and the test result of the standard sample fell within the standard range (the concentration of the GBW07316).

2.3. Heavy Metals Pollution Assessment Method

The single-factor index method was employed to assess the heavy metal pollution levels in the sediments of Daya Bay. The calculation formula is as follows:
Q i = C i C 0 ,
where Q i is the pollution index of the i-th sampling station, C i represents the measured concentration, and C 0 denotes the reference standard value (in this study, the Marine Sediment Quality Standard of China [21] was adopted). A value of Q i ≤ 1 indicates that the corresponding heavy metal is not present at polluting levels, whereas Q i > 1 indicates the presence of pollution.

3. Results

3.1. Deposition Background: Grain Size and TOC

The results for sedimentary grain size composition and TOC contents in the study area are presented in Table 1. The surface sediments of Daya Bay are generally fine-grained, with the lithology dominated by silt and sandy silt (Table 1). The mean grain size ranges from 7.07 to 22.51 μm, with an average of 13.60 μm. Silt is the most abundant component, accounting for 50.89–85.91% (an average of 69.04%), followed by clay, which ranges from 9.26% to 23.24%, with an average of 16.39%. The sand content exhibits considerable variability, ranging from 0 to 35.37%, with an average of 14.57%. Coarser sediments are primarily distributed in the eastern and western parts of the study area, whereas two centers of fine-grained sediments can be observed in the central and northern regions (Figure 2). The northern fine-grained center is mainly composed of silt, while the central one is jointly dominated by silt and clay. The TOC content of sediments in the study area ranges from 0.41% to 1.83% (average: 1.06%). A tongue-shaped high-TOC zone extends from the estuary of the Dan’ao River in the northwest toward the southern part of the study area (Figure 3a), indicating the significant influence of riverine input on the spatial distribution of organic carbon. Moreover, areas with high TOC content strongly coincide with regions of fine-grained sediment accumulation (Figure 2 and Figure 3), suggesting that sedimentary organic carbon in the study area is predominantly associated with fine particles.

3.2. Baselines of Natural and Anthropogenic Radionuclides

The activities of the natural and anthropogenic radionuclides in surface sediments at different stations in the study area are presented in Table 2, and their spatial distributions are shown in Figure 3. Due to its short half-life (only 53.3 days), elevated activity of 7Be can only be detected in recently deposited sediments. In the study area, 7Be was detected only at certain stations in the southern and northeastern regions, with the highest activity reaching 17.21 Bq kg−1 in the south (Figure 3b). In contrast, the 7Be activities in the western part of the study area near the nuclear power plant were all below the detection limit (<5 Bq kg−1). The specific activity of total 210Pb in the sediments ranges from 104.7 to 166.9 Bq kg−1, with an average of 131.3 Bq kg−1. High 210Pb activities occurred near the shore in the western part and near the estuary in the northwestern part of the study area, while the central and northeastern regions showed distinctly lower levels of activity (Figure 3c). The specific activity of 228Th ranges from 44.8 to 72.2 Bq kg−1, with an average of 56.5 Bq kg−1. High 228Th values are concentrated in the central region and extend both northward and southward, while the eastern and western parts exhibit notably low values (Figure 3d). The specific activity of 226Ra varies from 28.8 to 35.4 Bq kg−1, with an average of 31.8 Bq kg−1, slightly lower than the global average of 35 Bq kg−1 [10] and the Chinese average of 37.6 Bq kg−1 [22]. Elevated 226Ra activity is mainly observed in the southwestern part of the study area, forming a tongue-shape pattern extending from the bay mouth toward the vicinity of the Daya Bay Nuclear Power Plant (Figure 3e), suggesting a potential influence from the external input of the open sea. The specific activity of 228Ra ranges from 43.05 to 59.7 Bq kg−1, with an average of 50.8 Bq kg−1. Its spatial distribution is similar to that of 228Th, with its high values mainly concentrated in the central region (Figure 3f). The specific activity of 40K ranges from 356.8 to 484.9 Bq kg−1, with an average of 434.3 Bq kg−1, slightly higher than the global average of 420 Bq kg−1 [10], but lower than the Chinese average of 584 Bq kg−1 [22]. The spatial pattern of 40K in the study area is characterized by higher values in the central region and lower values in both the eastern and western parts, closely resembling the distribution of 228Ra (Figure 3g).
137Cs is an anthropogenic radionuclide primarily originating from atmospheric nuclear weapons testing and nuclear accidents. The 137Cs activity in the study area is generally low, ranging from 0.4 to 1.8 Bq kg−1, with an average of 0.8 Bq kg−1. High 137Cs activity zones are found at the northern and southern ends of the study area. The northern high-value region is significantly influenced by riverine input, while the southern one may be attributed to contributions from Pearl River-derived materials. In contrast, the area surrounding the nuclear power plant shows distinctly low 137Cs activity (Figure 3h).
The discrepancies in the geochemical background give rise to variations in the radionuclide fingerprints of sediments across different regions (Table 2). This implies that the accumulation of baseline data is of paramount significance.
The results of Pearson correlation analysis (Table 3) indicate that in this study, only 228Th, 226Ra, and 228Ra show significant correlations with sediment grain size characteristics, suggesting that grain size exerts a controlling influence on their specific activities. Specifically, 228Th and 228Ra exhibit significant negative correlations with the sand fraction, while showing relatively strong positive correlations with the silt fraction. This is because 228Th and 228Ra in the sediment are mainly bound to the fine-grained aluminosilicate grain lattice [24]. In contrast, 226Ra demonstrates a significant negative correlation with the clay fraction, but no apparent correlation with either the sand or silt fractions. In addition, both 226Ra and 137Cs display significant positive correlations with TOC. Aside from these relationships, most radionuclides do not exhibit significant inter-correlations, with the exception of the significant positive correlation observed between 228Th and 228Ra.

3.3. Concentration and Pollution Assessment for Heavy Metals

The concentrations of heavy metals in surface sediments at different stations in the study area are presented in Table 4, revealing three distinct spatial distribution patterns. Cu, Pb, Zn, and Cd follow the first distribution pattern, with high-concentration zones all being located in the western part of the study area, and particularly exhibiting a peak near the power plants (Figure 4a–d). Cr, Mn, and As represent the second distribution pattern, characterized by a saddle-shaped pattern with higher concentrations in the central region and lower concentrations toward the east and west. Notable high-value centers are observed near the estuary in the northern part and the bay mouth in the southern part of the study area (Figure 4e–g). Hg exhibits a unique distribution pattern, showing a gradient of high concentrations in the northwest and lower values toward the southeast (Figure 4h).
The calculated results of the single-factor index method are shown in Table 5. In this study, at stations D2 and D5 the Q i values for Cu, Pb, and Zn exceeded 1, indicating relatively severe pollution by these metals at these two locations. Apart from this, the concentrations of heavy metals in surface sediments across Daya Bay remain at relatively low levels, suggesting a generally low degree of pollution.

4. Discussion

4.1. The Sedimentary Process Indicated by Radionuclides in Daya Bay

Excess 210Pb (210Pbex) in sediments can be used as an indicator of deposition [4]. In Daya Bay, the specific activity of excess 210Pbex ranges from 73.3 to 134.1 Bq kg−1, with an average of 99.5 Bq kg−1 (Table 2), suggesting that Daya Bay is in a continuous accumulation state. High 210Pbex activity zones are mainly distributed in the southwestern near-shore area with weak hydrodynamic conditions and the northwestern estuarine area of the study region, indicating that these locations represent the major depositional and accumulation zones of sediments in Daya Bay (Figure 5a). In addition, excess 228Th (228Thex) can also be used to indicate sedimentation processes on a time scale shorter than 210Pbex due to the differences in their half-lives (1.9 years for 228Th and 22.2 years for 210Pb). This also leads to significant differences in their spatial distribution characteristics. In this study, the specific activity of 228Thex is obviously lower than 210Pbex, ranging from −3.6 Bq kg−1 to 13.8 Bq kg−1, with an average of 5.7 Bq kg−1. This result indicates that the 228Th in the sediments of Daya Bay is primarily derived from the decay of 228Ra, and the two are in a state of approximate secular equilibrium. Notably, the 228Thex values at Station D21 in the northwestern part of the study area near the Dan’ao River estuary and at Station D22 in the northeastern region are negative (−3.6 and −1.3 Bq kg−1, respectively), indicating a deficit of 228Th relative to its parent 228Ra, and that secular equilibrium has not yet been established at these stations, a condition that may be influenced by the underground water discharge in these regions [25]. The high values of 228Thex are primarily concentrated in the central and eastern parts of the study area, whereas the northern and southern parts exhibit distinctly low values (Figure 5b). Despite the differences in spatial distribution, the subtle numerical variation indicates that 228Th cannot be effectively used to indicate marine sedimentary processes in the study area.
The distribution characteristics of 7Be also show significant differences from those of 210Pb and 228Th. Compared with 210Pb and 228Th, which have half-lives measured in years, the 53.3-day half-life of 7Be means that it is primarily used to indicate seasonal or event-related sedimentation processes [8,26]. The 7Be activities in the western part of the study area near the nuclear power plant were all below the detection limit (<5 Bq kg−1), indicating that sediments in this region had not received recent riverine sediment input [8]. The results of 7Be indicate that the sedimentation process in the study area during winter (the season when samples were collected) is relatively weak and mainly occurs in the bay mouth area. It is worth noting that, although 210Pb, due to its high particulate reactivity, can also be used to indicate episodic sedimentation processes in some cases [4], its long half-life tends to dilute short-term non-episodic sedimentation signals given its long-term background, resulting in differences from the results of 7Be. This indicates that the sedimentation process of sediments in Daya Bay during winter differs from the long-term accumulation process, because the sedimentation primarily occurs during summer in Daya Bay. In winter, on one hand, the stronger dynamics are not conducive to sedimentation, and on the other hand, the limited material input restricts the occurrence of the sedimentation process.
In summary, although different radionuclide indicators exhibit varying spatial distribution characteristics, none of them show a clear impact effect from the nuclear power plant (Figure 3 and Figure 5). Therefore, whether considering a short time scale (winter) or a long-time scale (several years to several decades), the sedimentation processes in the waters surrounding the Daya Bay Nuclear Power Plant are primarily controlled by the bay’s own sedimentary dynamic processes. The activities related to the nuclear power plant (such as the intake and discharge of cooling water) do not have a significant influence on the sedimentation processes in the bay. Admittedly, the present study is confined to sampling and analysis conducted solely in the winter season. The absence of data corresponding to the strong summer monsoon period may introduce a degree of temporal bias into the findings. To address this limitation, our future work will encompass sampling and analysis across multiple seasons and extended time frames, thereby enhancing the comprehensiveness and accuracy of the insights derived.

4.2. The Sources of Heavy Metals and Their Relationship with Radionuclides

According to the spatial distribution characteristics for the different heavy metals and the results of correlation analysis among heavy metals with respect to grain size and TOC, these eight heavy metals in the study area can be classified into three groups, as influenced by different sources and geochemical behavior processes. Cu, Pb, Zn, and Cd form the first group. They are significantly correlated with one another but show no correlation with grain size or TOC (Table 6), suggesting that these metals mainly result from nearby anthropogenic inputs and have not undergone long-distance transport [11]. Cr, Mn, and As exhibit significant inter-element correlations, showing significant negative correlations with coarse-grained components and significant positive correlations with TOC (Table 6). This indicates that these metals are predominantly associated with fine-grained sediments and organic matter and likely originate from riverine input [11,17]. Next, Cr, Mn, and As form the second group, metals which are likely influenced by both the Dan’ao River discharge and external inputs from the open sea. Hg belongs to the third category, and exhibits a unique distribution pattern while displaying a positive, though not statistically significant, correlation with fine-grained sediments and TOC (Table 6); this suggests that it primarily originates within the bay, including a partial influence from river input (but not as the dominant source), and offshore contributions are likely negligible. Previous studies have identified the discharge of large volumes of industrial wastewater along the coast and atmospheric pollutants released from fossil fuel combustion in industrial activities as the major sources of Hg in sediments of the Daya Bay region [12,27].
The activity of radionuclides and the content of heavy metals are both important components of the chemical characteristics of marine sediments [1,4,11,12]. In addition to being influenced by their sources, their geochemical behaviors (such as adsorption, sedimentation, and redox regulation) also show certain similarities [16,24,25,28]. To further explore the relationship between heavy metals and radionuclides in the sediments of the sea area surrounding the Daya Bay Nuclear Power Plant, this study conducted a correlation analysis between the two, with the correlation coefficients shown in Table 7. The results reveal a significant spatial distribution correlation between some heavy metals and radionuclides in the sediments (Figure 3 and Figure 4), with the correlation patterns mainly controlled by the adsorption mechanisms of pollutant transport carriers, chemical precipitation behavior, and the homogeneity of external inputs. Cu and Zn show significant positive correlations with 210Pb (correlation coefficients of 0.557 and 0.503, respectively), which may be related to the high homogeneity of Cu, Zn, and Pb in the study area (Figure 4 and Table 6). Although Cu and Zn, as heavy metals, have high particle activity similar to 210Pb, their weak correlation with fine-grained sediments indicates that in the study area, the adsorption and sedimentation processes are not the dominant factors controlling their spatial distribution characteristics. The significant positive correlation between Cr and 228Ra (correlation coefficient of 0.545) indicates a connection between the two in the sediments, which may be realized through the enrichment of organic matter and the reductive environment generated by its degradation. In high-organic-matter sediment environments with strong reducing conditions, Cr can be fixed in the sediments in the form of hydroxides or sulfides [29], while 228Ra can co-precipitate with Ba2+ in sulfate form in high-organic-matter environments and become fixed in the sediments due to the similar chemical behavior between Ra and Ba [30]. The high correlation between both elements and TOC also supports this inference (Table 3 and Table 6). In addition, the significant correlation between Hg and 137Cs (correlation coefficient of 0.499) also reveals same source input, that is, they are derived from river inputs at the head of the bay and atmospheric deposition inputs. 137Cs, as a residual from nuclear testing, and mercury, which is highly volatile, may be transported over long distances through the atmosphere and then co-precipitate or enter the ocean through river-transported terrestrial particles [2,6,12]. They can then be synchronously retained in organic-rich sediments, showing a strong positive correlation with TOC (Table 3 and Table 6). The general negative correlation between most heavy metals (such as Pb and Cd) and 137Cs may be due to differences in mobility: 137Cs is strongly fixed in the lattice by clay minerals [31], while heavy metals adsorbed on the surface of particles are more easily activated and transported [28,32], causing their differentiation in sediments. From a geological perspective, these correlations not only provide key clues for pollution source tracing (for example, the combination of 210Pb and Cu (Zn) indicates industrial input, while the Hg-137Cs association reflects atmospheric deposition), but also provide a new perspective for reconstructing the evolution of sedimentary environments. For example, the co-precipitation of Cr and 228Ra marks the development of reducing environments in recent years. This has potential value for reconstructing sedimentary environments (such as anoxic events). Moreover, the negative correlation between 137Cs and heavy metals suggests that heavy metals adsorbed on the surface of particles may undergo further activation and migration, posing a greater ecological risk, and thus targeted remediation strategies need to be developed. Therefore, the geochemical behavior of pollutants in the sedimentary system is jointly regulated by the adsorption-desorption equilibrium of carriers, redox oscillations, and input pathways. The correlation network provides important geochemical evidence for regional environmental quality assessment and the reconstruction of pollution history.
It is worth noting that, although there is a certain correlation between radionuclides and heavy metals, the sources and distribution characteristics of the two in Daya Bay are not significantly affected by the operation of the nuclear power plant. In addition, during the detection processes associated with the samples, no effective spectral peaks of key anthropogenic radionuclides commonly produced by the operation of nuclear power plants (such as 60Co, with a minimum detectable activity of 0.44 Bq kg−1 and 110mAg, with a minimum detectable activity of 0.35 Bq kg−1) were found. This further indicates that the operation of the Daya Bay Nuclear Power Plant has a negligible impact on the radionuclide contamination of the sediments in the surrounding marine areas.
In summary, monitoring radionuclides and metal pollutants in the marine environment is crucial for the environmental protection of coastal areas significantly affected by human activities and for the study of relevant environmental processes. For example, Pappa et al. (2018, 2019) successfully established the historical pollution situation of a mining area and identified the environmental impacts of different mining periods by monitoring radionuclides and metal pollutants in the sediments of the different mining area [33,34]. Their research not only effectively assessed the pollution levels of the area but also provided important scientific references for the formulation of environmental management and remediation measures in those regions. Although the results of this study show that the operation of the Daya Bay Nuclear Power Plant has not significantly affected the levels of heavy metals and radionuclides in the surface sediments of the surrounding sea areas, and radionuclides and heavy metals are not necessarily closely related, the joint study of radionuclides and heavy metals is still of great significance. In addition to using radionuclides for dating, the indicator radionuclides of material transport such as 7Be and 210Pb can further help to understand the sources, migration and transformation processes of modern pollutants (such as heavy metals), so as to better protect the marine ecosystem and promote sustainable development.

5. Conclusions

This study comprehensively investigated the distribution and relationship of radionuclides and heavy metals in marine sediments surrounding the Daya Bay Nuclear Power Plant. The results indicated that the baseline levels of both natural and anthropogenic radionuclides and heavy metals were predominantly influenced by natural processes and local anthropogenic activities rather than the operation of the nuclear power plant. Fine-grained sediments dominated the surface sediment composition, with radionuclide activities and heavy metal concentrations exhibiting distinct spatial patterns. Notably, the absence of key anthropogenic radionuclides typically associated with nuclear power plant operations (such as 90Sr, 60Co, and 110mAg) in the samples further confirmed the negligible impact of the power plant on local sediment contamination. Heavy metals exhibited distinct spatial patterns: Cu, Pb, Zn, and Cd peaked near industrial zones in the western region, likely from local anthropogenic sources; Cr, Mn, and As correlated with riverine and marine inputs; Hg showed localized enrichment in the northwest, possibly linked to industrial emissions. However, the single-factor pollution indices for heavy metals also suggested low pollution levels in the sediments. This research provides critical baseline data for assessing environmental quality and pollution control in Daya Bay, highlighting the resilience of the local ecosystem despite anthropogenic pressures. Future studies should focus on long-term monitoring and further exploration of the interaction mechanisms between radionuclides and heavy metals in marine sedimentary environments.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.H., H.L. (Haidong Li) and Y.L. (Yunhai Li); methodology, Y.L. (Yunpeng Lin); validation, H.L. (Haidong Li) and Y.L. (Yunhai Li); formal analysis, B.Z.; investigation, X.Z. and Y.X.; resources, C.H. and Y.L. (Yunhai Li); data curation, H.L. (Heshan Lin) and M.C.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.L. (Yunpeng Lin); writing—review and editing, C.H., H.L. (Haidong Li), Y.L. (Yunhai Li), Q.Z., M.C. and F.S.; visualization, Y.L. (Yunpeng Lin); supervision, C.H., H.L. (Haidong Li) and Y.L. (Yunhai Li); project administration, C.H., H.L. (Haidong Li) and Y.L. (Yunhai Li); funding acquisition, C.H., Y.L. (Yunhai Li) and M.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Marine Physical and Geological Processes (KLMPG-23-07), the National Science Foundation of Fujian Province, China (2022J05228), and the National Science Foundation of China (42176220).

Data Availability Statement

Data inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We thank all the investigators for their help in collecting data during the surveys.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors Chengpeng Huang, Xueqiang Zhu and Yiming Xu are employed by the company Shanghai Nuclear Engineering Research & Design Institute Co., Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abbasi, A.; Mirekhtiary, F. Heavy metals and natural radioactivity concentration in sediments of the Mediterranean Sea coast. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2020, 154, 111041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Lan, J.; Wang, T.; Chawchai, S.; Cheng, P.; Zhou, K.; Yu, K.; Yan, D.; Wang, Y.; Zang, J.; Liu, Y.; et al. Time marker of 137Cs fallout maximum in lake sediments of Northwest China. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2020, 241, 106413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. United Nations. UNSCEAR 2020/2021 Report, Sources, Effects and Risks of Ionizing Radiation. Volume II: SCIENTIFIC ANNEX B: Levels and Effects of Radiation Exposure Due to the Accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station: Implications of Information Published Since the UNSCEAR 2013 Report; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  4. Lin, Y.; Li, Y.; Liu, M.; Wang, L.; Zheng, B.; Long, Z.; Xu, J. Typhoon Chan-Hom (2015) induced sediment cross-shore transport in the mud depo-center of the East China Sea inner shelf. Mar. Geol. 2024, 469, 107223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Swarzenski, P.W. 210Pb Dating. In Encyclopedia of Scientific Dating Methods; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2014; pp. 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  6. Zhang, F.; Wang, J.; Liu, D.; Bi, Q.; Du, J. Distribution of 137Cs in the Bohai Sea, Yellow Sea and East China Sea: Sources, budgets and environmental implications. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 672, 1004–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Su, C.C.; Huh, C.A. 210Pb, 137Cs and 239,240Pu in East China Sea sediments: Sources, pathways and budgets of sediments and radionuclides. Mar. Geol. 2002, 183, 163–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wu, J.; Rabouille, C.; Charmasson, S.; Reyss, J.L.; Cagnat, X. Constraining the origin of recently deposited particles using natural radionuclides 7Be and 234Thex in deltaic sediments. Cont. Shelf Res. 2018, 165, 106–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. UNSCEAR. Hereditary Effects of Radiation: UNSCEAR 2001 Report to the General Assembly with Scientific Annex; The Committee: Vienna, Austria, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  10. UNSCEAR. Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation. Report to General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  11. Lin, Y.; Li, Y.; Zheng, B.; Yin, X.; Wang, L.; He, J.; Shu, F. Impact of typhoon Matmo (2014) on the distribution of heavy metals in Quanzhou Bay. Anthr. Coasts 2019, 2, 209–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Man, X.; Huang, H.; Chen, F.; Gu, Y.; Liang, R.; Wang, B.; Jordan, R.W.; Jiang, S. Anthropogenic impacts on the temporal variation of heavy metals in Daya Bay (South China). Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2022, 185, 114209. [Google Scholar]
  13. Geng, B.; Lu, L.; Cao, Q.; Zhou, W.; Li, S.; Wen, D.; Hong, M. Three-dimensional numerical study of cooling water discharge of Daya Bay Nuclear Power Plant in southern coast of China during summer. Front. Mar. Sci. 2023, 9, 1012260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zeng, L.; Chen, G.; Wang, T.; Zhang, S.; Dai, M.; Yu, J.; Zhang, C.; Fang, J.; Huang, H. Acoustic study on the outbreak of Creseise acicula nearby the Daya Bay Nuclear Power Plant Base during the summer of 2020. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2021, 165, 112144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lin, Y.; Cao, H.; Liu, M.; Qi, F.; Zhang, S.; Xu, J. The influence of thermal discharge from power plants on the biogeochemical environment of Daya Bay during high primary productivity seasons. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2025, 211, 117408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Wang, H.; Fan, Z.; Kuang, Z.; Yuan, Y.; Liu, H.; Huang, H. Heavy Metals in Marine Surface Sediments of Daya Bay, Southern China: Spatial Distribution, Sources Apportionment, and Ecological Risk Assessment. Front. Environ. Sci. 2021, 9, 755873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yang, Y.; Li, Y.; Huang, C.; Chen, F.; Chen, C.; Zhang, H.; Deng, W.; Ye, F. Anthropogenic influences on the sources and distribution of organic carbon, black carbon, and heavy metals in Daya Bay’s surface sediments. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2023, 196, 115571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Dan, S.F.; Li, S.; Yang, B.; Cui, D.; Ning, Z.; Huang, H.; Zhou, J.; Yang, J. Influence of sedimentary organic matter sources on the distribution characteristics and preservation status of organic carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, and biogenic silica in the Daya Bay, northern South China Sea. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 783, 146899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, Y.-S.; Lou, Z.-P.; Sun, C.-C.; Sun, S. Ecological environment changes in Daya Bay, China, from 1982 to 2004. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2008, 56, 1871–1879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, Z.-H.; Song, S.-H.; Qi, Y.-Z. Acomparative study of phytoneuston the phytoplankton community structure in Daya Bay South China Sea. J. Sea Res. 2014, 85, 474–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. GB 18668-2002; Marine Sediment Quality. China Standards Press: Beijing, China, 2002.
  22. Wang, Z. Natural radiation environment in China. Int. Congr. Ser. 2002, 1225, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chiara, T.; Antonietta, R.; Linda, B.; Paolo, B.; Carmela, V. Evaluation of The Radionuclide Concentration in The Sediments of The Sacca Di Goro (Italy). Environ. Anal. Eco. Stud. 2019, 4, 000598. [Google Scholar]
  24. Zhong, Q.; Wang, H.; Wang, Q.; Chen, S.; Lin, J.; Huang, D.; Yu, T. Study of Ra desorption processes in an estuary system with high-turbidity at the Southeast China. J. Environ. Radioactiv. 2023, 259–260, 107108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhou, W.; Zhong, Q.; Shao, Y.; Zhou, D.; Ji, J. Evaluation of excess Th-228 in surface bottom sediment of shallow marine ecosystem: A case study from Dongshan Bay. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2024, 333, 3965–3975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Williams, J.R.; Kuehl, S.A.; Clyne, E.R.; Dellapenna, T.M. Seasonal variability of 7Be in suspended sediments from the Copper River, Alaska: Implications for quantifying recent flood deposits in coastal environments. Geo-Mar. Lett. 2018, 38, 467–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yu, X.; Zhou, W.; Cao, Q.; Sun, L.; Zhu, X.; Bian, G.; Hong, M. Distribution characteristics and risk assessment of heavy metals in seawater, sediment and shellfish in the inner and outer Daya Bay, Guangdong. Front. Mar. Sci. 2022, 9, 1064287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sun, X.; Fan, D.; Liu, M.; Tian, Y.; Pang, Y.; Liao, H. Source identification, geochemical normalization and influence factors of heavy metals in Yangtze River Estuary sediment. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 241, 938–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Li, X.; Li, T.; Rao, W.; Mao, C. Characteristics and Relevance of Reduced Inorganic Sulphur Forms and Heavy Metal Elements in Surface Sediments of the Dongzhai Harbour Mangrove Wetland. Sustainability 2025, 17, 2029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Brandt, F.; Klinkenberg, M.; Poonoosamy, J.; Bosbach, D. Recrystallization and uptake of 226Ra into Ba-rich (Ba,Sr)SO4 solid solutions. Minerals 2020, 10, 812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wauters, J.; Cremers, A. Effect of particle concentration and fixation on radiocesium sorption. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1996, 30, 2892–2898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Liu, M.; Fan, D.; Bi, N.; Sun, X.; Tian, Y. Impact of water-sediment regulation on the transport of heavy metals from the Yellow River to the sea in 2015. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 658, 268–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Pappa, F.K.; Tsabaris, C.; Patiris, D.L.; Androulakaki, E.G.; Eleftheriou, G.; Betsou, C.; Michalopoulou, V.; Kokkoris, M.; Vlastou, R. Historical trends and assessment of radionuclides and heavy metals in sediments near an abandoned mine, Lavrio, Greece. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 30084–30100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Pappa, F.K.; Tsabaris, C.; Patiris, D.L.; Eleftheriou, G.; Ioannidou, A.; Androulakaki, E.G.; Kokkoris, M.; Vlastou, R. Temporal investigation of radionuclides and heavy metals in a coastal mining area at Ierissos Gulf, Greece. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 27457–27469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) The location of the study area. (b) Sampling stations in the Daya Bay. The yellow rectangle represents the location of the Daya Bay Nuclear Power Plant; the black dots represent the sampling stations.
Figure 1. (a) The location of the study area. (b) Sampling stations in the Daya Bay. The yellow rectangle represents the location of the Daya Bay Nuclear Power Plant; the black dots represent the sampling stations.
Jmse 13 01237 g001
Figure 2. Distribution of (a) Mz, (b) sand, (c) silt, and (d) clay in the surface sediments of Daya Bay.
Figure 2. Distribution of (a) Mz, (b) sand, (c) silt, and (d) clay in the surface sediments of Daya Bay.
Jmse 13 01237 g002
Figure 3. Distribution of (a) TOC content, (b) 7Be, (c) 210Pb, (d) 228Th, (e) 226Ra, (f) 228Ra, (g) 40K, and (h) 137Cs in the surface sediments of Daya Bay.
Figure 3. Distribution of (a) TOC content, (b) 7Be, (c) 210Pb, (d) 228Th, (e) 226Ra, (f) 228Ra, (g) 40K, and (h) 137Cs in the surface sediments of Daya Bay.
Jmse 13 01237 g003
Figure 4. Distribution of (a) Cu, (b) Pb, (c) Zn, (d) Cd, (e) Cr, (f) Mn, (g) As, and (h) Hg in the surface sediments of Daya Bay.
Figure 4. Distribution of (a) Cu, (b) Pb, (c) Zn, (d) Cd, (e) Cr, (f) Mn, (g) As, and (h) Hg in the surface sediments of Daya Bay.
Jmse 13 01237 g004
Figure 5. Distribution of (a) 210Pbex and (b) 228Thex in the surface sediments of Daya Bay.
Figure 5. Distribution of (a) 210Pbex and (b) 228Thex in the surface sediments of Daya Bay.
Jmse 13 01237 g005
Table 1. Lithology; size distribution (in wt%) of sand (>63 μm), silt (4–63 μm), and clay (<4 μm) fractions; mean grain size (Mz, μm); and TOC contents (in wt%) in the sediments of Daya Bay.
Table 1. Lithology; size distribution (in wt%) of sand (>63 μm), silt (4–63 μm), and clay (<4 μm) fractions; mean grain size (Mz, μm); and TOC contents (in wt%) in the sediments of Daya Bay.
StationLithologyParticle-Size Distribution, %Mz, μmTOC, %
>63 μm4–63 μm<4 μm
D01Sandy silt25.0465.729.2622.511.26
D02Silt6.4779.5214.0111.701.23
D03Sandy silt28.6051.1820.2316.280.69
D04Clayey silt8.0971.0120.9010.810.71
D05Sandy silt25.9761.3512.6820.270.41
D06silt0.0676.7023.247.071.48
D07Clayey silt16.6762.1121.2212.431.29
D09Sandy silt33.3150.8915.8018.891.03
D10Silt1.2378.3520.428.391.26
D11Sandy silt35.3753.0811.5522.220.48
D14Silt9.1276.4214.4713.120.62
D15Silt2.8885.9111.2112.001.23
D16Sandy silt17.2367.0715.7014.610.78
D17Clayey silt10.6073.9915.4112.740.99
D19Silt3.2979.3217.398.861.51
D20Sandy silt28.6351.7319.6516.271.55
D21Silt3.0882.8314.1010.511.83
D22Silt7.8678.1513.9911.681.22
D25Sandy silt27.4760.6711.8618.810.62
Average 14.5769.0416.3913.601.06
Table 2. Activity concentrations (in Bq kg−1) of 7Be, 210Pb, 228Th, 226Ra, 228Ra, 40K, 137Cs, 210Pbex, and 228Thex radionuclides in the sediments of Daya Bay.
Table 2. Activity concentrations (in Bq kg−1) of 7Be, 210Pb, 228Th, 226Ra, 228Ra, 40K, 137Cs, 210Pbex, and 228Thex radionuclides in the sediments of Daya Bay.
Station7Be210Pb228Th226Ra228Ra40K137Cs210Pbex228Thex
D01125.953.335.149.4455.91.390.93.9
D02166.956.832.756.7476.90.5134.10.1
D03118.244.829.543.3428.81.288.81.5
D04162.754.929.451.2356.81.2133.33.7
D05139.754.234.143.1421.40.4105.611.2
D06117.972.230.559.7484.91.187.512.5
D07129.856.730.143.5409.50.899.713.2
D09105.053.831.646.9422.10.573.36.9
D1014.5104.765.329.853.4436.70.474.911.9
D1111.4116.647.532.944.7449.60.683.72.8
D14123.254.233.652.3437.20.789.61.9
D15132.866.635.155.8462.11.097.710.8
D16119.051.235.445.5433.20.483.65.6
D1717.3137.861.935.455.7456.40.9102.46.2
D1910.9140.258.230.754.9462.81.8109.53.3
D208.0150.059.429.855.1359.30.9120.24.3
D21139.946.628.850.2418.51.2111.1−3.6
D2213.7128.554.429.255.7448.50.599.3−1.3
D25136.261.830.648.0431.50.3105.613.8
Average12.6131.356.531.850.8434.30.899.55.7
Global average [10]35.0420.0
Chinese average [22]37.6584.0
Sacca Di Goro [23]25.8550.611.8
Mediterranean Sea [1]20.1467.3
“–” represent no data.
Table 3. Pearson correlation coefficient matrix of radionuclides with grain size composition and TOC contents, for Daya Bay (n = 19). Significant values (p < 0.05) are shown in bold.
Table 3. Pearson correlation coefficient matrix of radionuclides with grain size composition and TOC contents, for Daya Bay (n = 19). Significant values (p < 0.05) are shown in bold.
SandSiltClayMzTOC210Pb228Th226Ra228Ra40K137Cs
Sand1
Silt−0.946 **1
Clay−0.249 −0.079 1
Mz0.917 **−0.754 **−0.566 **1
TOC−0.513 *0.443 0.253 −0.544 *1
210Pb−0.214 0.239 −0.050 −0.161 0.127 1
228Th−0.482 *0.407 0.266 −0.475 *0.302 0.010 1
226Ra0.128 0.073 −0.592 **0.382 −0.355 −0.071 0.062 1
228Ra−0.700 **0.673 **0.150 −0.648 **0.566 *0.287 0.671 **−0.060 1
40K−0.323 0.447 −0.324 −0.149 0.108 −0.279 0.287 0.405 0.338 1
137Cs−0.314 0.257 0.196 −0.303 0.479 *0.222 −0.029 −0.173 0.265 0.045 1
* Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). ** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Table 4. Concentration of heavy metals in the sediments of the Daya Bay. The unit is ng g−1 for Hg and μg g−1 for others.
Table 4. Concentration of heavy metals in the sediments of the Daya Bay. The unit is ng g−1 for Hg and μg g−1 for others.
StationCuPbZnCdCrMnHgAs
D0112.90 29.80 76.10 0.19 27.60 667.00 61.00 7.73
D0276.30 180.00 187.00 0.37 41.30 639.00 52.00 6.23
D038.01 19.60 49.10 0.16 14.90 412.00 38.00 5.62
D0426.00 38.50 72.00 0.19 33.30 383.00 99.00 7.53
D0577.50 245.00 161.00 0.46 27.90 378.00 78.00 5.31
D0615.00 32.20 80.80 0.18 33.30 643.00 67.00 6.23
D0714.80 33.10 80.90 0.18 30.60 822.00 33.00 7.01
D0912.50 27.20 64.40 0.18 27.70 489.00 62.00 6.38
D1014.10 33.20 78.80 0.18 31.40 666.00 44.00 6.83
D116.26 16.50 41.70 0.15 12.00 334.00 34.00 4.97
D147.74 20.50 45.70 0.17 14.90 405.00 71.00 6.08
D1512.60 26.70 66.40 0.18 27.60 540.00 79.00 6.17
D167.46 21.50 47.70 0.16 14.80 425.00 47.00 6.17
D1710.20 25.30 60.80 0.17 22.20 565.00 58.00 6.86
D1916.00 28.50 75.60 0.19 39.10 590.00 88.00 5.92
D2017.90 33.90 66.70 0.19 34.30 467.00 78.00 6.74
D2116.20 28.70 78.00 0.23 38.70 701.00 145.00 6.90
D2211.80 23.70 67.30 0.18 39.40 528.00 51.00 6.29
D255.54 16.10 39.00 0.15 11.60 391.00 51.00 5.77
Average19.41 46.32 75.74 0.20 27.51 528.68 65.05 6.35
Table 5. Evaluation results for sediment quality, single-factor index. The values > 1 are shown in bold.
Table 5. Evaluation results for sediment quality, single-factor index. The values > 1 are shown in bold.
StationCuPbZnCdCrHgAs
D10.370.500.510.390.350.310.39
D22.183.001.250.730.520.260.31
D30.230.330.330.330.190.190.28
D40.740.640.480.370.420.500.38
D52.214.081.070.930.350.390.27
D60.430.540.540.370.420.340.31
D70.420.550.540.360.380.170.35
D90.360.450.430.360.350.310.32
D100.400.550.530.360.390.220.34
D110.180.280.280.310.150.170.25
D140.220.340.300.330.190.360.30
D150.360.450.440.360.350.400.31
D160.210.360.320.320.190.240.31
D170.290.420.410.340.280.290.34
D190.460.480.500.370.490.440.30
D200.510.570.440.380.430.390.34
D210.460.480.520.450.480.730.35
D220.340.400.450.360.490.260.31
D250.160.270.260.310.150.260.29
Table 6. Pearson correlation coefficient matrix of heavy metals with grain size composition and TOC contents in the Daya Bay (n = 19). Significant values (p < 0.05) are shown in bold.
Table 6. Pearson correlation coefficient matrix of heavy metals with grain size composition and TOC contents in the Daya Bay (n = 19). Significant values (p < 0.05) are shown in bold.
SandSiltClayTOCCuPbZnCdCrMnHgAs
Sand1
Silt0.943 **1
Clay−0.267 −0.069 1
TOC0.513 *0.443 0.253 1
Cu−0.061 0.102 −0.113 −0.103 1
Pb0.034 0.027 −0.179 −0.213 0.975 **1
Zn−0.200 0.229 −0.062 0.115 0.962 **0.916 **1
Cd−0.006 0.080 −0.214 −0.115 0.965 **0.987 **0.919 **1
Cr0.552 *0.484 *0.251 0.749 **0.414 0.281 0.564 *0.351 1
Mn0.506 *0.444 0.229 0.784 **0.015 −0.057 0.271 0.006 0.599 **1
Hg−0.385 0.416 −0.051 0.422 0.131 0.068 0.118 0.192 0.462 *0.088 1
As−0.317 0.251 0.223 0.502 *−0.144 −0.253 −0.019 −0.205 0.436 0.557 *0.289 1
* Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). ** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Table 7. Pearson correlation coefficient matrix of heavy metals with radionuclides in Daya Bay (n = 19). Significant values (p < 0.05) are shown in bold.
Table 7. Pearson correlation coefficient matrix of heavy metals with radionuclides in Daya Bay (n = 19). Significant values (p < 0.05) are shown in bold.
210Pb228Th226Ra228Ra40K137Cs
Cu0.557 *−0.0050.1360.0110.035−0.220
Pb0.431−0.0230.221−0.1040.064−0.302
Zn0.503 *0.0900.0970.1320.169−0.142
Cd0.442−0.0630.189−0.0890.059−0.226
Cr0.4430.240−0.4000.545 *−0.0150.333
Mn−0.0030.300−0.1750.3040.2800.288
Hg0.428−0.061−0.1990.261−0.2710.499 *
As0.2180.158−0.1200.273−0.3200.310
* Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Huang, C.; Lin, Y.; Li, H.; Zheng, B.; Zhu, X.; Xu, Y.; Lin, H.; Zhong, Q.; Shu, F.; Cai, M.; et al. Distribution and Relationship of Radionuclides and Heavy Metal Concentrations in Marine Sediments from the Areas Surrounding the Daya Bay Power Plant, Southeast China. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2025, 13, 1237. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13071237

AMA Style

Huang C, Lin Y, Li H, Zheng B, Zhu X, Xu Y, Lin H, Zhong Q, Shu F, Cai M, et al. Distribution and Relationship of Radionuclides and Heavy Metal Concentrations in Marine Sediments from the Areas Surrounding the Daya Bay Power Plant, Southeast China. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2025; 13(7):1237. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13071237

Chicago/Turabian Style

Huang, Chengpeng, Yunpeng Lin, Haidong Li, Binxin Zheng, Xueqiang Zhu, Yiming Xu, Heshan Lin, Qiangqiang Zhong, Fangfang Shu, Mingjiang Cai, and et al. 2025. "Distribution and Relationship of Radionuclides and Heavy Metal Concentrations in Marine Sediments from the Areas Surrounding the Daya Bay Power Plant, Southeast China" Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 13, no. 7: 1237. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13071237

APA Style

Huang, C., Lin, Y., Li, H., Zheng, B., Zhu, X., Xu, Y., Lin, H., Zhong, Q., Shu, F., Cai, M., & Li, Y. (2025). Distribution and Relationship of Radionuclides and Heavy Metal Concentrations in Marine Sediments from the Areas Surrounding the Daya Bay Power Plant, Southeast China. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 13(7), 1237. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13071237

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop