A Comprehensive Review of Floating Solar Plants and Potentials for Offshore Applications
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Development of Photovoltaic Technology
2.1. Ground-Mounted Photovoltaic (GPV)
2.1.1. Utility-Scale Photovoltaic Power Systems
- Cost effective
- 2.
- Store for later use
- 3.
- Environmental impact
- 4.
- Improve the quality of local life
- Large land occupation
- 2.
- Material hazard
2.1.2. Distributed Photovoltaic Power System
- Cheaper electricity prices
- 2.
- More efficient and easier to maintain
2.2. Offshore Photovoltaic Systems
2.2.1. Fixed Pile-Based Photovoltaic Systems
- Wide range of applications
- 2.
- High system stability
- 3.
- More suitable for fish farming
- Anti-corrosion and anti-rust design
- 2.
- Environmental issues of using PHC piles
- 3.
- Difficulty in transportation and maintenance
- 4.
- Resistance to snow and sea ice
2.2.2. Floating Photovoltaic (FPV)
- Floating pontoon offshore floating modules of multi-array and multi-mooring
- Tubular floaters offshore floating modules of multi-array and multi-mooring
- Very large floating structures (VLFS)
- Very flexible floating structures (VFFS)
Pontoon Floaters Module
- Various applicable scenarios
- 2.
- Lower cost and easy to manufacture
- 3.
- Easy to install and transport
- 4.
- Prevents excessive water evaporation
- 5.
- Excellent sea water cooling performance
- Anti-corrosion and prevention of aquatic fouling
- 2.
- Designed to withstand strong winds and waves
- 3.
- Inspection and maintenance
Tubular Floaters Module
- Poor stability, less applicable water area
- 2.
- Construction and maintenance difficulties
VLFS
- Suitable for various wind and wave conditions
- 2
- Better cooling effect by the film platform
- 3.
- Diversification of deployment modes
- The single module is bulky and requires towing
- 2.
- Design of the anchoring system in the deep sea
- 3.
- Development of special operation and maintenance equipment
VFFS
- Lower cost and simpler mooring system required
- 2.
- Sea and land dual use, wider scope of application
3. Method
3.1. The Design of the Floating Structure
3.2. PV Module
3.3. Mooring System
3.4. Transportation and Installation
4. Conclusions
- FPV systems utilize expansive and underutilized bodies of water to establish renewable energy power generation systems. In comparison to land-based pile PV systems, they offer the advantage of conserving valuable land resources that can be utilized for agriculture, mining, tourism and other activities. This utilization of water surfaces for PV installations provides an innovative and sustainable approach to expanding renewable energy capacity while minimizing land-use conflicts.
- The HDPE floating structure has short lead times, low development costs, strong corrosion resistance and easy transportation. With the exception of very large floating structures in the far reaches of the ocean, all floating platforms can be easily deployed without the need for large equipment.
- The offshore FPV system applies to more waters and covers a wider range. In undeveloped and far-reaching sea areas, the conceptual design of “same scenery, complementary fishing and light” can be tried. The combination of deep-sea aquaculture and renewable energy power generation has been a hot topic in marine science for a long time and has been studied and applied in the offshore FPV system [123].
- Large-scale coverage of photovoltaic modules has been proven to effectively reduce water surface temperature, improve the water ecological environment and significantly reduce water evaporation, contributing to the conservation of scarce water resources. Especially in arid or semi-arid regions, recyclable water resources are more valuable, but abundant solar energy resources are favorable conditions for solar power generation.
- Offshore PV systems with water-cooled passive cooling have higher photovoltaic conversion efficiency than land-based PV systems, while significantly reducing the probability of photovoltaic module failure due to heat accumulation, providing a guarantee for the development of more efficient photovoltaic cells.
- The presence of salt and microorganisms in sea water poses a challenge to the durability and functionality of floating structures, photovoltaic modules and electrical equipment. The corrosive nature of sea water can lead to degradation and damage over time. Furthermore, the attachment of aquatic organisms to submerged components and mooring cables can affect the buoyancy of the floating system and the tension of the mooring system. Therefore, it is crucial to prioritize the implementation of robust anti-corrosion measures and develop effective strategies to mitigate biological parasitism and ensure waterproof design. These considerations are essential for enhancing the long-term performance and resilience of offshore FPV systems.
- Compared to large-scale onshore photovoltaic systems, floating photovoltaic systems have lower average power generation density and energy density. The average power generation density of CSP is 20.33 ± 12.74 W/m2, and the average energy density is 0.178 ± 0.112 TWh/km2. However, the average power generation density of floating photovoltaic systems is 9.91 ± 3.28 W/m2, and the average energy density is 0.087 ± 0.029 TWh/km2 [124], which is almost half that of terrestrial photovoltaic systems.
- In the process of photovoltaic panel production and pulverized recovery of PHC pipe piles, there are a lot of toxic raw materials, which seriously affect the health of workers and the balance of the ecological environment. Therefore, safe, environmentally friendly and efficient manufacturing processes should be adopted while improving the efficiency of photovoltaic panel conversion.
- The development of renewable energy in deep-sea areas has always been a hot research direction. The dynamic response analysis of floating structure and mooring systems is particularly important under complex wind and wave conditions. A multi-scale coupled analysis model of hydrodynamic, structure-material and mooring was designed to evaluate the stability of the system under extreme marine environments and verify the feasibility and sustainability of the system under severe environmental loads. The research and development of very flexible thin-film photovoltaic cells will be accelerated.
- Unlike terrestrial photovoltaic systems, the cleaning and maintenance of offshore FPV systems present unique challenges that require careful consideration and improvement. The accumulation of bird excrement and sea water stains on the photovoltaic modules can lead to the formation of hotspots and subsequent circuit failures within the system. However, the development and implementation of cleaning robots specifically designed for offshore FPV are still in the early stages of research and verification and have not yet been widely deployed. Additionally, there is a lack of an innovative design for operation and maintenance equipment, such as intelligent detection devices, dedicated maintenance vessels, fatigue warning systems for components and integrated monitoring systems that encompass both land and sea areas. Addressing these issues is crucial for enhancing the operational efficiency and longevity of offshore FPV systems.
- Currently, the benefits of FPV power generation yield relatively modest returns and low power generation using merely FPV systems. Researchers attempt a combination of multiple power generation methods, such as building fishery complementary photovoltaic systems or wind turbine and photovoltaic floating power stations. Consequently, sharing power grid systems and mooring systems is essential if floating wind and solar plants are jointly utilized.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Holechek, J.L.; Geli, H.M.; Sawalhah, M.N.; Valdez, R. A global assessment: Can renewable energy replace fossil fuels by 2050? Sustainability 2022, 14, 4792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shah, S.A.R.; Zhang, Q.; Abbas, J.; Balsalobre-Lorente, D.; Pilař, L. Technology, urbanization and natural gas supply matter for carbon neutrality: A new evidence of environmental sustainability under the Prism of COP26. Resour. Policy 2023, 82, 103465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xue, J. Photovoltaic agriculture-New opportunity for photovoltaic applications in China. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 73, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- IEA. Solar PV—Analysis. Available online: https://www.iea.org/reports/solar-pv (accessed on 25 May 2023).
- Zhang, S.; He, Y. Analysis on the development and policy of solar PV power in China. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 21, 393–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghosh, S.; Yadav, R. Future of photovoltaic technologies: A comprehensive review. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2021, 47, 101410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kılıç, U.; Kekezoğlu, B. A review of solar photovoltaic incentives and Policy: Selected countries and Turkey. Ain Shams Eng. J. 2022, 13, 101669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, J.; Mi, Z.; Coffman, D.M.; Milcheva, S.; Shan, Y.; Guan, D.; Wang, S. Regional development and carbon emissions in China. Energy Econ. 2019, 81, 25–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qi, Y.; Stern, N.; He, J.-K.; Lu, J.-Q.; Liu, T.-L.; King, D.; Wu, T. The policy-driven peak and reduction of China’s carbon emissions. Adv. Clim. Chang. Res. 2020, 11, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mallapaty, S. How China could be carbon neutral by mid-century. Nature 2020, 586, 482–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, G.; McLellan, B.; Liu, X.F.; Wang, L. A review of photovoltaic poverty alleviation projects in China: Current status, challenge and policy recommendations. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 94, 214–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- IEA. Snapshot 2023—IEA-PVPS. Available online: https://iea-pvps.org/snapshot-reports/snapshot-2023/ (accessed on 26 May 2023).
- Jäger-Waldau, A.; Kakoulaki, G.; Taylor, N.; Szábo, S. The role of the European Green Deal for the photovoltaic market growth in the European Union. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE 49th Photovoltaics Specialists Conference (PVSC), Philadelphia, PA, USA, 5–10 June 2022; pp. 0508–0511. [Google Scholar]
- United Nations. COP26: Together for Our Planet. Available online: https://www.un.org/en/climatechange/cop26 (accessed on 29 May 2023).
- Arora, N.K.; Mishra, I. COP26: More challenges than achievements. Environ. Sustain. 2021, 4, 585–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- IEA. Outlook for Electricity–World Energy Outlook 2020–Analysis. Available online: https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2020/outlook-for-electricity (accessed on 28 May 2023).
- Haegel, N.M.; Atwater, H., Jr.; Barnes, T.; Breyer, C.; Burrell, A.; Chiang, Y.-M.; De Wolf, S.; Dimmler, B.; Feldman, D.; Glunz, S. Terawatt-scale photovoltaics: Transform global energy. Science 2019, 364, 836–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Victoria, M.; Haegel, N.; Peters, I.M.; Sinton, R.; Jäger-Waldau, A.; del Canizo, C.; Breyer, C.; Stocks, M.; Blakers, A.; Kaizuka, I. Solar photovoltaics is ready to power a sustainable future. Joule 2021, 5, 1041–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, W.; Yan, C.; Ren, Z.; Yuan, Z.; Liu, Y.; Zheng, S.; Li, X.; Han, X. Review on the development of marine floating photovoltaic systems. Ocean Eng. 2023, 286, 115560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barbón, A.; Bayón-Cueli, C.; Bayón, L.; Rodríguez-Suanzes, C. Analysis of the tilt and azimuth angles of photovoltaic systems in non-ideal positions for urban applications. Appl. Energy 2022, 305, 117802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Souza Junior, M.E.T.; Freitas, L.C.G. Power Electronics for Modern Sustainable Power Systems: Distributed Generation, Microgrids and Smart Grids—A Review. Sustainability 2022, 14, 3597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Solar Energy Technology Office. Solar Futures Study. Available online: https://www.energy.gov/eere/solar/solar-futures-study (accessed on 28 May 2023).
- Media, C. Can Solar Developers and Farmers Find Common Ground? Available online: https://www.canarymedia.com/articles/solar/can-solar-developers-and-farmers-find-common-ground (accessed on 28 May 2023).
- Pouran, H.M. From collapsed coal mines to floating solar farms, why China’s new power stations matter. Energy Policy 2018, 123, 414–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Campana, P.E.; Wästhage, L.; Nookuea, W.; Tan, Y.; Yan, J. Optimization and assessment of floating and floating-tracking PV systems integrated in on-and off-grid hybrid energy systems. Sol. Energy 2019, 177, 782–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, L.; Sun, Q.; Li, H.; Yin, H.; Ren, X.; Wennersten, R. Evaluating the benefits of integrating floating photovoltaic and pumped storage power system. Energy Convers. Manag. 2019, 194, 173–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, L.; Wang, Q.; Lin, H.; Li, H.; Sun, Q. Power generation efficiency and prospects of floating photovoltaic systems. Energy Procedia 2017, 105, 1136–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ranjbaran, P.; Yousefi, H.; Gharehpetian, G.; Astaraei, F.R. A review on floating photovoltaic (FPV) power generation units. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019, 110, 332–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, M.; Chandel, S.; Kumar, A. Performance analysis of a 10 MWp utility scale grid-connected canal-top photovoltaic power plant under Indian climatic conditions. Energy 2020, 204, 117903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramasamy, V.; Feldman, D.; Desai, J.; Margolis, R. US Solar Photovoltaic System and Energy Storage Cost Benchmarks: Q1 2021; National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL): Golden, CO, USA, 2021.
- Green, M.A. Photovoltaic technology and visions for the future. Prog. Energy 2019, 1, 013001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kibaara, S.; Murage, D.; Musau, P.; Saulo, M. Economic, Environmental, Health and Social Impacts of Utility Scale Solar Energy Generation: A Review. In Proceedings of the Sustainable Research and Innovation Conference, Pretoria, South Africa, 20–24 June 2022; pp. 39–44. [Google Scholar]
- Gonzalo, A.P.; Marugán, A.P.; Márquez, F.P.G. A review of the application performances of concentrated solar power systems. Appl. Energy 2019, 255, 113893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tiwari, A.K.; Kumar, V.; Said, Z.; Paliwal, H. A review on the application of hybrid nanofluids for parabolic trough collector: Recent progress and outlook. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 292, 126031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krishna, Y.; Faizal, M.; Saidur, R.; Ng, K.; Aslfattahi, N. State-of-the-art heat transfer fluids for parabolic trough collector. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2020, 152, 119541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rungasamy, A.; Craig, K.; Meyer, J.P. A review of linear Fresnel primary optical design methodologies. Sol. Energy 2021, 224, 833–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Esfanjani, P.; Jahangiri, S.; Heidarian, A.; Valipour, M.S.; Rashidi, S. A review on solar-powered cooling systems coupled with parabolic dish collector and linear Fresnel reflector. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 42616–42646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, J.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, L.; Zhang, Z.; Wei, J. Comprehensive review of line-focus concentrating solar thermal technologies: Parabolic trough collector (PTC) vs linear Fresnel reflector (LFR). J. Therm. Sci. 2020, 29, 1097–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Merchán, R.; Santos, M.; Medina, A.; Hernández, A.C. High temperature central tower plants for concentrated solar power: 2021 overview. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 155, 111828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sahu, S.K.; Kopalakrishnaswami, A.S.; Natarajan, S.K. Historical overview of power generation in solar parabolic dish collector system. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 64404–64446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Daniels, T.L. The development of utility-scale solar projects on US agricultural land: Opportunities and obstacles. Socio-Ecol. Pract. Res. 2023, 5, 205–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- SEIA. Utility-Scale Solar Power. Available online: https://www.seia.org/initiatives/utility-scale-solar-power (accessed on 29 May 2023).
- Mehedi, T.H.; Gemechu, E.; Kumar, A. Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions and energy footprints of utility-scale solar energy systems. Appl. Energy 2022, 314, 118918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bullich-Massagué, E.; Cifuentes-García, F.-J.; Glenny-Crende, I.; Cheah-Mañé, M.; Aragüés-Peñalba, M.; Díaz-González, F.; Gomis-Bellmunt, O. A review of energy storage technologies for large scale photovoltaic power plants. Appl. Energy 2020, 274, 115213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lelieveld, J.; Klingmüller, K.; Pozzer, A.; Burnett, R.; Haines, A.; Ramanathan, V. Effects of fossil fuel and total anthropogenic emission removal on public health and climate. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 7192–7197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wiser, R.H.; Bolinger, M.; Seel, J. Benchmarking Utility-Scale PV Operational Expenses and Project Lifetimes: Results from a Survey of US Solar Industry Professionals; Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL): Berkeley, CA, USA, 2020.
- Mousavi, S.; Farahani, G. Introducing a new method of automatic cleaning of the PV array surface using a suction robot. Mechatronics 2022, 85, 102845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharaf, M.; Yousef, M.S.; Huzayyin, A.S. Review of cooling techniques used to enhance the efficiency of photovoltaic power systems. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 26131–26159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, Y.; Gong, S.; Zhang, C.; Ge, M.; Xie, L. Performance analysis of a solar photovoltaic power generation system with spray cooling. Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 2022, 29, 101723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- NREL.gov. Land Use by System Technology. Available online: https://www.nrel.gov/analysis/tech-size.html (accessed on 30 May 2023).
- Liu, F.-W.; Cheng, T.-M.; Chen, Y.-J.; Yueh, K.-C.; Tang, S.-Y.; Wang, K.; Wu, C.-L.; Tsai, H.-S.; Yu, Y.-J.; Lai, C.-H. High-yield recycling and recovery of copper, indium, and gallium from waste copper indium gallium selenide thin-film solar panels. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2022, 241, 111691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allouhi, A.; Rehman, S.; Buker, M.S.; Said, Z. Up-to-date literature review on Solar PV systems: Technology progress, market status and R&D. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 362, 132339. [Google Scholar]
- Khezri, R.; Mahmoudi, A.; Aki, H. Optimal planning of solar photovoltaic and battery storage systems for grid-connected residential sector: Review, challenges and new perspectives. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 153, 111763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, H.; Zhu, J.; Li, S.; Wu, W.; Zhu, H.; Fan, J. Short-term residential household reactive power forecasting considering active power demand via deep Transformer sequence-to-sequence networks. Appl. Energy 2023, 329, 120281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- IEA. Distributed PV Capacity Growth by Segment, 2007–2024–Charts–Data & Statistics. Available online: https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/charts/distributed-pv-capacity-growth-by-segment-2007-2024 (accessed on 31 May 2023).
- Razmi, D.; Lu, T. A Literature Review of the Control Challenges of Distributed Energy Resources Based on Microgrids (MGs): Past, Present and Future. Energies 2022, 15, 4676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, S.; Liang, W.; Wang, G.; Zhang, Y.; Cao, S. A novel water-free cleaning robot for dust removal from distributed photovoltaic (PV) in water-scarce areas. Sol. Energy 2022, 241, 553–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yousuf, H.; Khokhar, M.Q.; Zahid, M.A.; Kim, J.; Kim, Y.; Cho, E.-C.; Cho, Y.H.; Yi, J. A review on floating photovoltaic technology (FPVT). Curr. Photovolt. Res. 2020, 8, 67–78. [Google Scholar]
- Sahu, A.; Yadav, N.; Sudhakar, K. Floating photovoltaic power plant: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 66, 815–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dash, P.; Gupta, N. Effect of temperature on power output from different commercially available photovoltaic modules. Int. J. Eng. Res. Appl. 2015, 5, 148–151. [Google Scholar]
- Kjeldstad, T.; Lindholm, D.; Marstein, E.; Selj, J. Cooling of floating photovoltaics and the importance of water temperature. Sol. Energy 2021, 218, 544–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dörenkämper, M.; Wahed, A.; Kumar, A.; de Jong, M.; Kroon, J.; Reindl, T. The cooling effect of floating PV in two different climate zones: A comparison of field test data from the Netherlands and Singapore. Sol. Energy 2021, 219, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tina, G.M.; Scavo, F.B.; Gagliano, A. Multilayer thermal model for evaluating the performances of monofacial and bifacial photovoltaic modules. IEEE J. Photovolt. 2020, 10, 1035–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tina, G.M.; Scavo, F.B.; Merlo, L.; Bizzarri, F. Analysis of water environment on the performances of floating photovoltaic plants. Renew. Energy 2021, 175, 281–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Micheli, L. The temperature of floating photovoltaics: Case studies, models and recent findings. Sol. Energy 2022, 242, 234–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Lund, P.D. Review of Recent Offshore Photovoltaics Development. Energies 2022, 15, 7462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seetao. About 7.97 Billion Yuan! Shandong Offshore Photovoltaic Project Launched—Seetao. Available online: https://www.seetao.com/details/213371.html (accessed on 1 June 2023).
- Li, P.; Gao, X.; Li, Z.; Ye, T.; Zhou, X. Effects of fishery complementary photovoltaic power plant on near-surface meteorology and energy balance. Renew. Energy 2022, 187, 698–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bellini, E. Chinese Fish Pond Hosts 550 MW Solar Farm. Available online: https://www.pv-magazine.com/2022/01/07/chinese-fish-pond-hosts-550-mw-solar-farm/ (accessed on 2 October 2023).
- Liu, F.; Feng, W.; Xiong, Z.; Li, L.; Yang, Y.; Lin, H.; Shen, Y. Impact performance of new prestressed high-performance concrete pipe piles manufactured with an environmentally friendly technique. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 231, 683–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, P.; Gao, X.; Jiang, J.; Yang, L.; Li, Y. Characteristic analysis of water quality variation and fish impact study of fish-lighting complementary photovoltaic power station. Energies 2020, 13, 4822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, J.; Gilbert, R.B.; Manuel, L.; Ku, A. Comparative assessment of component and system reliability for offshore platform pile foundations. In Proceedings of the International Foundations Congress & Equipment Expo Innovations in Geotechnical Engineering, Orlando, FL, USA, 5–10 March 2018; pp. 371–388. [Google Scholar]
- Ueda, Y.; Sakurai, T.; Tatebe, S.; Itoh, A.; Kurokawa, K. Performance analysis of PV systems on the water. In Proceedings of the 23rd European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, Valencia, Spain; 2008; pp. 2670–2673. [Google Scholar]
- Smyth, M.; Russell, J.; Milanowski, T. Solar Energy in the Winemaking Industry; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Trapani, K.; Redón Santafé, M. A review of floating photovoltaic installations: 2007–2013. Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 2015, 23, 524–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bellini, E. Japan’s Largest Floating PV Plant Catches Fire after Typhoon Faxai Impact. Available online: https://www.pv-magazine.com/2019/09/09/japans-largest-floating-pv-plant-catches-fire-after-typhoon-faxai-impact/ (accessed on 20 October 2023).
- Kaymak, M.K.; Şahin, A.D. Problems encountered with floating photovoltaic systems under real conditions: A new FPV concept and novel solutions. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2021, 47, 101504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Zareer, M.; Dincer, I.; Rosen, M.A. Performance improvement study of an integrated photovoltaic system for offshore power production. Int. J. Energy Res. 2021, 45, 772–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hasan, A.; Dincer, I. A new performance assessment methodology of bifacial photovoltaic solar panels for offshore applications. Energy Convers. Manag. 2020, 220, 112972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- News, T.X.-T.A.E. Japan Has Floating Solar Power Plants in Hyogo Prefecture. Available online: https://techxplore.com/news/2015-04-japan-solar-power-hyogo-prefecture.html (accessed on 2 June 2023).
- Ma, C.; Wu, R.; Su, H. Design of floating photovoltaic power plant and its environmental effects in different stages: A review. J. Renew. Sustain. Energy 2021, 13, 062701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, Y.; Ju, X.; Yu, B.; Wang, Z.; Xu, C. Investment risk evaluation of inland floating photovoltaic power plants in China using the HFLTS–TFN method. Clean Energy 2021, 5, 536–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, H.; Krishna, V.; Lun Leung, J.; Reindl, T.; Zhao, L. Field experience and performance analysis of floating PV technologies in the tropics. Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 2018, 26, 957–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Friel, D.; Karimirad, M.; Whittaker, T.; Doran, J.; Howlin, E. A review of floating photovoltaic design concepts and installed variations. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference Offshore Renew Energy CORE, Cardiff, UK, 3–4 July 2019; pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- Nguyen, K.Q.; Mwiseneza, C.; Mohamed, K.; Cousin, P.; Robert, M.; Benmokrane, B. Long-term testing methods for HDPE pipe-advantages and disadvantages: A review. Eng. Fract. Mech. 2021, 246, 107629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- The Straits Times. How Singapore Built One of the World’s Biggest Floating Solar Farms. Available online: https://www.straitstimes.com/multimedia/graphics/2021/05/singapore-largest-solar-farm-water/index.html?shell (accessed on 2 June 2023).
- Abdelal, Q. Floating PV; an assessment of water quality and evaporation reduction in semi-arid regions. Int. J. Low-Carbon Technol. 2021, 16, 732–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Del Rio-Gamero, B.; Rodríguez-López, E.; Schallenberg-Rodríguez, J. Desalination Plant for Irrigation Purposes Driven by an Inland Floating Photovoltaic System. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2023, 11, 905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elminshawy, N.A.; Mohamed, A.; Osama, A.; Amin, I.; Bassam, A.M.; Oterkus, E. Performance and potential of a novel floating photovoltaic system in Egyptian winter climate on calm water surface. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2022, 47, 12798–12814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bontempo Scavo, F.; Tina, G.M.; Gagliano, A.; Nižetić, S. An assessment study of evaporation rate models on a water basin with floating photovoltaic plants. Int. J. Energy Res. 2021, 45, 167–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, M.; Guo, H.; Wang, R.; Tao, R.; Cheng, N. Effects of gap resonance on the hydrodynamics and dynamics of a multi-module floating system with narrow gaps. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2021, 9, 1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosa-Clot, M. Floating PV Plants; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Claus, R.; López, M. Key issues in the design of floating photovoltaic structures for the marine environment. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 164, 112502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ziar, H. Floating solar stations. In 10 Breakthrough Ideas Energy Next 10 Years; Delft University of Technology: Delft, The Netherlands, 2021; Volume 2, pp. 30–43. [Google Scholar]
- PM Magazine. Offshore Photovoltaics a Step Closer. Available online: https://www.pv-magazine.com/2021/08/26/offshore-photovoltaics-a-step-closer/ (accessed on 3 June 2023).
- Daroen, I. Risk Assessment of Offshore Floating Photovoltaic Systems: Methodology for Technological Risks; Delft University of Technology: Delft, The Netherlands, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, X.; Zhou, W. Performance evaluation of aquavoltaics in China: Retrospect and prospect. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2023, 173, 113109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, P.; Wellens, P.R. Theoretical analysis of nonlinear fluid–structure interaction between large-scale polymer offshore floating photovoltaics and waves. Ocean Eng. 2022, 249, 110829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, M.; Ouyang, M.; Guo, H.; Zou, M.; Zhang, C. A Coupled Hydrodynamic–Structural Model for Flexible Interconnected Multiple Floating Bodies. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2023, 11, 813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, M.; Zou, M.; Zhu, L. Frequency-domain response analysis of adjacent multiple floaters with flexible connections. J. Ship Mech. 2018, 22, 1164–1180. [Google Scholar]
- Zou, M.; Chen, M.; Zhu, L.; Li, L.; Zhao, W. A constant parameter time domain model for dynamic modelling of multi-body system with strong hydrodynamic interactions. Ocean Eng. 2023, 268, 113376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, M.; Ouyang, M.; Li, T.; Zou, M.; Ye, J.; Tian, X. Numerical modelling of a catamaran float-over deck installation for a spar platform with complex hydrodynamic interactions and mechanical couplings. Ocean Eng. 2023, 287, 115905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schreier, S.; Jacobi, G. Experimental investigation of wave interaction with a thin floating sheet. Int. J. Offshore Polar Eng. 2021, 31, 435–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trapani, K.; Martens, S.; Challagulla, K.; Yong, S.; Millar, D.; Maloney, S. Water absorption characterisation, electrical reliability and mechanical testing of a submerged laminated a-Si thin film photovoltaic (PV) cells. Microelectron. Reliab. 2014, 54, 2456–2462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosa-Clot, M.; Tina, G. Chapter 4—Submerged PV systems. Submerg. Float. Photovolt. Syst. 2018, 65–87. [Google Scholar]
- Bellini, E. Open-Source Method to Build Flexible Floating PV Systems. Available online: https://www.pv-magazine.com/2020/11/09/open-source-method-to-build-flexible-floating-pv-systems/ (accessed on 2 October 2023).
- Paterson, M.; Moore, B.; Newcomer, S.C.; Nessler, J.A. Insulation and material characteristics of smoothskin neoprene vs silicone-coated neoprene in surf wetsuits. Sports Eng. 2023, 26, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pilar Sánchez Molina, E.B. CIGS Solar Panels for Offshore PV. Available online: https://www.pv-magazine.com/2021/12/01/cigs-solar-panels-for-offshore-pv/ (accessed on 2 October 2023).
- Zhang, M.; Schreier, S. Review of wave interaction with continuous flexible floating structures. Ocean Eng. 2022, 264, 112404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, A.; Ma, H.; Fang, H.; Liu, Y.; Li, H. Fluid-structure-material coupling analysis for a floating laminated structure consisting of high-stiffness panels and a soft core. Mar. Struct. 2023, 89, 103375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saga, T. Advances in crystalline silicon solar cell technology for industrial mass production. NPG Asia Mater. 2010, 2, 96–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alrashidi, H.; Issa, W.; Sellami, N.; Ghosh, A.; Mallick, T.K.; Sundaram, S. Performance assessment of cadmium telluride-based semi-transparent glazing for power saving in façade buildings. Energy Build. 2020, 215, 109585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghosh, A. Potential of building integrated and attached/applied photovoltaic (BIPV/BAPV) for adaptive less energy-hungry building’s skin: A comprehensive Review. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 276, 123343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chu, L.; Zhai, S.; Ahmad, W.; Zhang, J.; Zang, Y.; Yan, W.; Li, Y. High-performance large-area perovskite photovoltaic modules. Nano Res. Energy 2022, 1, e9120024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gu, W.; Ma, T.; Ahmed, S.; Zhang, Y.; Peng, J. A comprehensive review and outlook of bifacial photovoltaic (bPV) technology. Energy Convers. Manag. 2020, 223, 113283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ziar, H.; Prudon, B.; Lin, F.Y.; Roeffen, B.; Heijkoop, D.; Stark, T.; Teurlincx, S.; de Senerpont Domis, L.; Goma, E.G.; Extebarria, J.G. Innovative floating bifacial photovoltaic solutions for inland water areas. Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 2021, 29, 725–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tina, G.M.; Scavo, F.B.; Merlo, L.; Bizzarri, F. Comparative analysis of monofacial and bifacial photovoltaic modules for floating power plants. Appl. Energy 2021, 281, 116084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramanujam, J.; Bishop, D.M.; Todorov, T.K.; Gunawan, O.; Rath, J.; Nekovei, R.; Artegiani, E.; Romeo, A. Flexible CIGS, CdTe and a-Si: H based thin film solar cells: A review. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2020, 110, 100619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kanotra, R.; Shankar, R. Floating Solar Photovoltaic Mooring System Design and Analysis. In Proceedings of the OCEANS 2022-Chennai, Chennai, India, 21–24 February 2022; pp. 1–9. [Google Scholar]
- Yan, X.; Chen, C.; Yin, G.; Ong, M.C.; Ma, Y.; Fan, T. Numerical investigations on nonlinear effects of catenary mooring systems for a 10-MW FOWT in shallow water. Ocean Eng. 2023, 276, 114207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gorjian, S.; Sharon, H.; Ebadi, H.; Kant, K.; Scavo, F.B.; Tina, G.M. Recent technical advancements, economics and environmental impacts of floating photovoltaic solar energy conversion systems. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 278, 124285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bank, W. Where Sun Meets Water: Floating Solar Market Report. Available online: https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/energy/publication/where-sun-meets-water (accessed on 4 June 2023).
- Hendarti, R. A study on PV floating solar system for Grouper Fish aquaculture in Pulau Panggang, Jakarta. In Proceedings of the IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Bogor, Indonesia, 10–11 November 2020; p. 012158. [Google Scholar]
- Nøland, J.K.; Auxepaules, J.; Rousset, A.; Perney, B.; Falletti, G. Spatial energy density of large-scale electricity generation from power sources worldwide. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 21280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Huang, G.; Tang, Y.; Chen, X.; Chen, M.; Jiang, Y. A Comprehensive Review of Floating Solar Plants and Potentials for Offshore Applications. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2023, 11, 2064. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11112064
Huang G, Tang Y, Chen X, Chen M, Jiang Y. A Comprehensive Review of Floating Solar Plants and Potentials for Offshore Applications. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2023; 11(11):2064. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11112064
Chicago/Turabian StyleHuang, Guozhen, Yichang Tang, Xi Chen, Mingsheng Chen, and Yanlin Jiang. 2023. "A Comprehensive Review of Floating Solar Plants and Potentials for Offshore Applications" Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 11, no. 11: 2064. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11112064
APA StyleHuang, G., Tang, Y., Chen, X., Chen, M., & Jiang, Y. (2023). A Comprehensive Review of Floating Solar Plants and Potentials for Offshore Applications. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 11(11), 2064. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11112064