Review Reports
- Hangyu Chen1,
- Yinglei Bu2 and
- Kun Zong1,3
- et al.
Reviewer 1: Fernando Jorge Mendes De Sousa Reviewer 2: Hung-Jie Tang
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
The paper is very interesting. My only concern is the time interval used for training (7200s in a 3h simulation). What is the purpose of using prediction methods if you have to perform around 70% of the simulation ? I didn't know how to take this into consideration on the previous questions, and this is the reason why a I suggested a major revision on your work.
Comments for author File: 
Comments.pdf
Author Response
The detailed response to the reviewer is uploaded as attachments. Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
Please see the attached WORD file.
Comments for author File: Comments.pdf
Author Response
The detailed response to the reviewer is uploaded as the attachment. Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 2 Report
I have no further comment.