Impacts of Flue Gas Desulfurization Gypsum Application Method and Drip Irrigation Rate on Water Movement and Initial Reclamation Efficacy in Saline–Alkali Soil

The conventional method of flue gas desulfurization gypsum (FGDG) application, i.e., blending with flood irrigation, is hindered by low water efficiency and significant amendment loss due to runoff and uncontrolled leaching, particularly in arid and semi-arid regions in which water scarcity is a major constraint. This study aimed to evaluate a novel integration of FGDG band application with drip irrigation to enhance targeting and resource efficiency. A laboratory-scale experiment investigated the effects of two FGDG application methods (band and blend application) and drip rates (0.3 and 0.6 L h⁻¹) on soil water movement and chemical properties. Band application significantly accelerated initial wetting front advancement by up to 44.9 cm h⁻¹ near the emitter and sustained horizontal propagation, while blend application promoted a more uniform water distribution. Chemically, band application created localized zones of reduced pH (7.57–8.62) and elevated water-soluble Ca²⁺ (up to 492.2 mmol kg⁻¹), facilitating a 79.1% reduction in exchangeable Na⁺ near the emitter. In contrast, blend application resulted in broader but shallower amendment distribution, reducing exchangeable sodium percentage uniformly to 1.99–4.16% across the soil profile. The combination of banded FGDG and drip irrigation achieves targeted amelioration, with superior Na⁺/Ca²⁺ exchange and favorable moisture dynamics resulting from the synergy between amendment placement and water delivery. This approach is a viable strategy for precision reclamation in arid regions.