Next Article in Journal
Green Manure Cropping Systems and Their Ecological Functions: Current Knowledge, Mechanisms, and Future Perspectives
Previous Article in Journal
Determination of Physical Property Parameters of American Ginseng Seeds and Calibration of Discrete Element Simulation Parameters
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Trading for Stability: How Agricultural E-Commerce Participation Enhances Farmers’ Livelihood Resilience in Rural China

Northwest Institute of Historical Environment and Socio-Economic Development, Shaanxi Normal University, No. 620, West Chang’an Avenue, Xi’an 710119, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agriculture 2026, 16(14), 1533; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16141533 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 14 May 2026 / Revised: 11 July 2026 / Accepted: 15 July 2026 / Published: 17 July 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Agricultural Economics, Policies and Rural Management)

Abstract

Agricultural E-commerce alters farmers’ production and marketing decisions, thereby shaping land-use intensity and livelihood stability. In the context of rapid digital transformation, enhancing farmers’ livelihood resilience is critical to sustainable rural development and resilience to socio-economic and environmental shocks. Using survey data from 542 rural communities in China, this study examines the relationship between agricultural E-commerce participation and farmers’ livelihood resilience across its multidimensional components. The empirical results show that participation in agricultural E-commerce is positively associated with farmers’ overall livelihood resilience, with notable positive associations with buffering capacity, learning capacity, and self-organization capacity. Among these, learning capacity exhibits the strongest association, followed by buffering capacity and self-organization capacity. Farmers’ digital capability positively moderates the relationship between E-commerce participation and livelihood resilience by facilitating access to and effective use of digital information, thereby lowering information costs and contributing to returns from online market participation. Heterogeneity analysis further indicates that the positive association between agricultural E-commerce participation and livelihood resilience is stronger among cooperative members, households with adequate production capital, non-agricultural households, and families with sufficient labor resources. By identifying the role of agricultural E-commerce in building livelihood resilience, this study contributes to the empirical understanding of how digital engagement may support inclusive and sustainable rural development under similar institutional conditions.
Keywords: livelihood resilience; digital economy; land use intensity; agricultural cooperatives; adaptive capacity livelihood resilience; digital economy; land use intensity; agricultural cooperatives; adaptive capacity

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mu, L.; Zhang, H.; Ma, J. Trading for Stability: How Agricultural E-Commerce Participation Enhances Farmers’ Livelihood Resilience in Rural China. Agriculture 2026, 16, 1533. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16141533

AMA Style

Mu L, Zhang H, Ma J. Trading for Stability: How Agricultural E-Commerce Participation Enhances Farmers’ Livelihood Resilience in Rural China. Agriculture. 2026; 16(14):1533. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16141533

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mu, Lan, Hang Zhang, and Jiaxin Ma. 2026. "Trading for Stability: How Agricultural E-Commerce Participation Enhances Farmers’ Livelihood Resilience in Rural China" Agriculture 16, no. 14: 1533. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16141533

APA Style

Mu, L., Zhang, H., & Ma, J. (2026). Trading for Stability: How Agricultural E-Commerce Participation Enhances Farmers’ Livelihood Resilience in Rural China. Agriculture, 16(14), 1533. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16141533

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop