This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessArticle
Integrating Grain–Carbon Synergy and Ecological Risk Assessment for Sustainable Land Use in Mountainous High-Risk Areas
by
Qihong Ren
Qihong Ren 1,2,†,
Shu Wang
Shu Wang 1,2,†,
Quanli Xu
Quanli Xu 1,2,*
and
Zhenheng Gao
Zhenheng Gao 1,2
1
Faculty of Geography, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming 650500, China
2
GIS technology Engineering Research Centre for West-China Resources and Environment of Educational Ministry, Kunming 650500, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Agriculture 2025, 15(23), 2496; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15232496 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 22 September 2025
/
Revised: 11 November 2025
/
Accepted: 28 November 2025
/
Published: 30 November 2025
Abstract
Amid climate change and land-use transformation, the scientific identification of high-quality arable land reserves is critical for safeguarding both cropland quantity and quality. Conventional approaches, largely based on spatial autocorrelation and heterogeneity theories, inadequately capture the multi-scale integration of ecological functions and carbon cycling, particularly in ecologically high-risk areas where systematic identification and mechanism analysis are lacking. To address these challenges, this study introduces a geographically similar “grain-carbon” synergistic framework, paired with a “bidirectional optimization” strategy (negative elimination + positive selection), to overcome the shortcomings of traditional methods and mitigate grain–carbon trade-offs in high-risk areas. Using land-use data from Yunnan’s mountainous areas (2000–2020), integrated with InVEST-PLUS model outputs, multi-source remote sensing, and carbon pool datasets, we developed a dynamic land-use–carbon storage simulation framework under four policy scenarios: natural development, urban expansion, arable land protection, and ecological conservation. High-quality arable lands were identified through a geographic similarity analysis with the Geo detector, incorporating ecological vulnerability and landscape risk indices to delineate priority high-risk zones. Carbon storage degradation trends and land-use pressures were further considered to identify optimal areas for cropland-to-forest conversion, facilitating the implementation of the bidirectional optimization strategy. Multi-scenario simulations revealed an increase of 454.33 km2 in high-quality arable land, with the optimized scenario achieving a maximum carbon storage gain of 23.54 × 106 t, reversing carbon loss trends and enhancing both farmland protection and carbon sequestration. These findings validate the framework’s effectiveness, overcoming limitations of traditional methods and providing a robust strategy for coordinated optimization of carbon storage and arable land conservation in ecologically high-risk regions, with implications for regional carbon neutrality and food security.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Ren, Q.; Wang, S.; Xu, Q.; Gao, Z.
Integrating Grain–Carbon Synergy and Ecological Risk Assessment for Sustainable Land Use in Mountainous High-Risk Areas. Agriculture 2025, 15, 2496.
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15232496
AMA Style
Ren Q, Wang S, Xu Q, Gao Z.
Integrating Grain–Carbon Synergy and Ecological Risk Assessment for Sustainable Land Use in Mountainous High-Risk Areas. Agriculture. 2025; 15(23):2496.
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15232496
Chicago/Turabian Style
Ren, Qihong, Shu Wang, Quanli Xu, and Zhenheng Gao.
2025. "Integrating Grain–Carbon Synergy and Ecological Risk Assessment for Sustainable Land Use in Mountainous High-Risk Areas" Agriculture 15, no. 23: 2496.
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15232496
APA Style
Ren, Q., Wang, S., Xu, Q., & Gao, Z.
(2025). Integrating Grain–Carbon Synergy and Ecological Risk Assessment for Sustainable Land Use in Mountainous High-Risk Areas. Agriculture, 15(23), 2496.
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15232496
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details
here.
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
For more information on the journal statistics, click
here.
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.