This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessArticle
A Simple Method Using High Matric Suction Calibration Points to Optimize Soil–Water Characteristic Curves Derived from the Centrifuge Method
by
Bo Li
Bo Li 1
,
Hongyi Pan
Hongyi Pan 1,
Yue Tian
Yue Tian 2 and
Xiaoyan Jiao
Xiaoyan Jiao 3,*
1
College of Resources and Environment, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu 030801, China
2
Jinzhong Water Conservancy Development Center, Jinzhong 030606, China
3
College of Resources and Environment, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taiyuan 030031, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agriculture 2025, 15(21), 2223; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15212223 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 30 August 2025
/
Revised: 18 October 2025
/
Accepted: 22 October 2025
/
Published: 24 October 2025
Abstract
The centrifuge method serves as an efficient and rapid approach for determining the soil–water characteristic curve (SWCC). However, soil shrinkage during centrifugation remains overlooked and prior modified methods may suffer from complex operations, high costs, time consumption, and limited applicability. To address these issues, this study introduces a simple correction scheme (G3) for determining drying SWCCs using the centrifuge method based on high matric suction calibration points. The performance of the proposed G3 method was systematically evaluated against a modified method considering soil shrinkage (G1) and the conventional uncorrected method (G2). Results revealed significant soil linear shrinkage post-centrifugation, accompanied by a reduction in total soil porosity and an increase in soil bulk density. SWCCs from all methods exhibited strong consistency at low matric suction ranges but diverged markedly at high matric suction segments. High matric suction data dominated the SWCC fitting. The G1 method achieved the highest fitting accuracy, while the G3 method performed the worst yet maintained acceptable reliability. The G2 method yielded optimal SWCC for simulating saturated soil water content, field capacity, and permanent wilting point. Conversely, Hydrus-1D simulations revealed superior performance of the G3 method in simulating farmland soil moisture dynamics during the dehumidification process. Values of R2 across methods followed G3 > G1 > G2, while mean absolute error, mean absolute percentage error, and root mean square error exhibited the opposite trend. These findings highlight that the previous modified approaches are more suitable for low and medium matric suction ranges. The proposed correction method enhances drying SWCC performance across the full matric suction range, offering a practical refinement for the centrifuge method. This advancement could enhance the reliability in soil hydraulic characterization and contribute to a better understanding of the hydraulic–mechanical–chemical behavior in soils.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Li, B.; Pan, H.; Tian, Y.; Jiao, X.
A Simple Method Using High Matric Suction Calibration Points to Optimize Soil–Water Characteristic Curves Derived from the Centrifuge Method. Agriculture 2025, 15, 2223.
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15212223
AMA Style
Li B, Pan H, Tian Y, Jiao X.
A Simple Method Using High Matric Suction Calibration Points to Optimize Soil–Water Characteristic Curves Derived from the Centrifuge Method. Agriculture. 2025; 15(21):2223.
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15212223
Chicago/Turabian Style
Li, Bo, Hongyi Pan, Yue Tian, and Xiaoyan Jiao.
2025. "A Simple Method Using High Matric Suction Calibration Points to Optimize Soil–Water Characteristic Curves Derived from the Centrifuge Method" Agriculture 15, no. 21: 2223.
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15212223
APA Style
Li, B., Pan, H., Tian, Y., & Jiao, X.
(2025). A Simple Method Using High Matric Suction Calibration Points to Optimize Soil–Water Characteristic Curves Derived from the Centrifuge Method. Agriculture, 15(21), 2223.
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15212223
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details
here.
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
For more information on the journal statistics, click
here.
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.