Next Article in Journal
Differential Responses of Thai Fragrant Rice to Silicon Application Enhance Yield and Aroma Under Highland and Lowland Ecosystems
Previous Article in Journal
Predictive Modelling of Maize Yield Under Different Crop Density Using a Machine Learning Approach
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Seed Germination Ecology and Dormancy Release in Some Native and Underutilized Plant Species with Agronomic Potential

by
Georgios Varsamis
1,
Theodora Merou
1,
Ioanna Alexandropoulou
1,
Chrysoula Menti
1 and
Eleftherios Karapatzak
2,*
1
Department of Natural Environment and Climate Resilience, Democritus University of Thrace, 66100 Drama, Greece
2
Institute of Plant Breeding and Genetic Resources, Hellenic Agricultural Organization Demeter, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agriculture 2025, 15(20), 2139; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15202139
Submission received: 18 September 2025 / Revised: 9 October 2025 / Accepted: 13 October 2025 / Published: 14 October 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Seed Science and Technology)

Abstract

Within the context of sustainable exploitation of phytogenetic resources, the present study aimed to develop species-specific seed germination protocols for eighteen native and potentially underutilized plant species originating from northeastern Greece. The taxa were selected based on their antioxidant potential and their provenance to enhance their regional exploitation potential, thus utilizing the species’ local adaptation traits. To quantify the maximum germination potential in each case, seed viability was assessed using the tetrazolium (TTZ) test. The pre-treatments applied for seed dormancy release included cold stratification and the application of gibberellic acid (GA3) and kinetin. Germination tests revealed that 9 of the 18 species exhibited high germination percentages in the control treatment (ranging between 64 and 90%) indicating that after-ripening was sufficient for any seed dormancy release in a significant portion of the seed lot. Furthermore, cold stratification and hormonal treatments significantly enhanced germination in seven species (final seed germination up to 85%), indicating deeper physiological dormancy and confirming the role of cold stratification and phytohormones in dormancy release. Two species showed no germination under any pre-treatment while viable, indicating the presence of more complex dormancy mechanisms. Germination percentages were frequently lower than the corresponding seed viability values, which ranged from 70% to 100%, suggesting that a portion of the seed lot exhibited deeper dormancy throughout. The results showcased species with favorable germination patterns, thus successfully identifying species that can be readily propagated, as well as species that require specific pre-treatments. The study sets the basis for domestication and sustainable use of local antioxidant-rich flora, providing a clear roadmap for the agronomic utilization of the focal species to support the regional bioeconomy.

1. Introduction

Oxidative stress in humans is a well-recognized factor to aging and the development of a broad range of chronic illnesses including cancer, cardiovascular disease, neurodegenerative disorders, diabetes, and inflammation [1]. The human body has several mechanisms to maintain the redox balance through either endogenously produced antioxidants or externally supplied through food or supplements [2]. Polyphenols, flavonoids, carotenoids, and vitamins A, C, and E, originated by plants, can effectively regulate oxidative pathways by neutralizing free radicals and sequestering harmful metal ions [3]. Numerous studies have shown that diets rich in these compounds are associated with reduced risks of major chronic diseases. As a result, there is a growing demand for natural and healthier food options with consumers seeking alternatives to synthetic additives in food and cosmetics [4] and plant-based antioxidants to serve as a primary defense against oxidative stress [5]. This trend has intensified as of recently; the use of synthetic antioxidants has raised some concerns due to potential harmful effects on health [6]. Moreover, pharmaceutical expenditures, one of the largest healthcare costs globally, have driven a shift toward preventative strategies that emphasize well-being through diet and lifestyle [7]. Natural antioxidants are central to this shift, offering protective benefits against oxidative stress-related diseases and supporting efforts to reduce long-term dependence on pharmacological treatments [8]. The public perception that plant-based antioxidants are safer and healthier than synthetic ones has motivated the food industry towards replacing synthetic antioxidants with plant-derived ones [9] and meeting clean-label standards [4,10,11]. In addition, regulatory pressure (e.g., [12,13]) further reinforces this trend [14]. As a result, research activity and industrial investment in plant-based bioactive compounds with antioxidant potential have significantly increased.
Consequently, plant diversity is increasingly regarded as a key resource, since native, often neglected, and underutilized plant species are known to contain a reservoir of useful secondary metabolites due to both their adaptation to harsh environments and the development of their complex natural defense systems [15,16,17]. In general terms, plants possess a diverse set of secondary metabolites (e.g., antioxidants—including enzymatic and non-enzymatic compounds such as flavonoids, polyphenols, carotenoids, and ascorbic acid) the biosynthesis of which has evolved to serve specific ecological functions, such as environmental adaptation to reduce the impact of oxidative damage [15,18,19]. The re-evaluation of these species is part of a broader bio-economic strategy that extends across nutrition, medicine, cosmetics, and functional food markets [4,20,21]. Therefore, preserving and utilizing plant diversity can both be considered an environmental necessity, as well as a practical strategy for discovering novel nutraceutical and therapeutic agents [22].
A systematic and multi-stage process is essential to domesticate and commercialize native and underutilized species (NUS) for agronomic and industrial purposes. The first stage involves the selection of the promising taxa. This is typically based on ethnobotanical knowledge that is followed by preliminary phytochemical investigations to detect the presence of bioactive substances such as antioxidants [23,24,25]. The next stage is the development of ex situ propagation protocols to ensure sustainable production and preservation of the selected germplasm [26]. Propagation success is the essential first step to facilitate pilot and large-scale cultivation before the antioxidant potential can be reliably assessed in the cultivated material. As such, the next critical stage is the pilot cultivation trials that can result in the evaluation of the species’ agronomic performance and its adaptation to different soil and climate conditions [27]. Such trials are usually accompanied by research on biochemical evaluation under field conditions [26,28]. Finally, the ecological adaptability, yield potential, and economic viability of the species is evaluated offering both environmental resilience and opportunities for novel functional products [26,27].
An essential prerequisite for the agronomic and industrial exploitation of NUS is the successful development of species-specific seed germination and propagation protocols [29]. Many wild species exhibit seed dormancy—a trait evolved as an ecological adaptation to ensure survival under unpredictable conditions—which can significantly hinder their large-scale cultivation [30,31]. Overcoming these dormancy mechanisms is therefore critical to ensure uniform seedling emergence and enable further evaluation of phytochemical traits under controlled conditions. Species that fail to achieve acceptable germination rates or seedling survival are often excluded from domestication efforts, regardless of their phytochemical potential [32]. Thus, early-stage germination studies serve not only as a technical foundation but as a biological filter for determining which species can viably enter any bioeconomic value chains.
The cultivation of medicinal and aromatic NUS is gaining attention in Greece with significant agronomic and economic prospects [33]. Since 2017 the National Strategic Plan has pointed out the need to develop sustainable practices for the cultivation, processing, and marketing of such plants, to achieve competitiveness through higher yields and better quality. However, the lack of Greek-certified seed sources and the reliance on foreign seed suppliers is a serious problem considering that local germplasm can perform well under suitable agronomic management. In parallel, regional development frameworks, such as the 2021–2027 operational program for eastern Macedonia and Thrace, emphasize innovation and competitiveness in agrifood systems, creating opportunities for the integration of antioxidant-rich native species into bioeconomic value chains. This is aligned with the international trade trends of NUS, and their products, that have been continuously growing due to the increasing demand from the pharmaceutical, cosmetic, and food industries [34]. Consequently, the systematic evaluation of locally adapted wild species is considered an essential step towards domestication which can support both sustainable cultivation and regional economic diversification.
The aim of the present study was to develop germination protocols for eighteen native, and potentially underutilized plant species, selected from the literature for their documented potential to contain bioactive compounds, such as antioxidants. Since germination constitutes the initial stage in any domestication and cultivation process, the development of reliable and replicable germination protocols is considered a critical first step to ensure seedling production, field cultivation, and evaluation of their antioxidant capacity in man-made environments. This initial step can set the base for assessing the suitability of these species to be integrated into bio-economic value chains.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Species Selection and Seed Collection

The present study focuses on native and potentially underutilized plant species from the European, Mediterranean, Balkan, and Greek flora, all occurring in northeastern Greece; a region characterized by Mediterranean climatic and ecological conditions with continental features. The selection of the species was based not only on their documented antioxidant potential but also on their local provenance considering that the ecological adaptation of species to their cultivation environment can enhance their successful agronomic use [35]. Moreover, each species was sampled from a minimum of three geographically distinct subpopulations, ensuring enough genetic diversity for reliable protocol development. In addition, each species needed to produce an abundant seed supply to ensure sufficient material for experimental treatments. Finally, only species that are neither rare, threatened, nor legally protected were selected, to avoid any negative impact on natural populations. The collected species along with a summarization of their documented antioxidant activity are shown in Table 1.
Most of the species were collected from Mount Falakron in northeastern Greece. The climate of Mount Falakron is Mediterranean at low altitudes and becomes continental at higher elevations. The mid-altitude zone represents a transitional area between Mediterranean and continental conditions. Several species were collected from this zone, including Achillea crithmifolia, Achillea millefolium, Primula veris, Saponaria officinalis, Scutellaria altissima, Teucrium montanum, and Thymus praecox. Other taxa, such as Hypericum maculatum, Geranium macrorrhizum, Geranium sanguineum, Prunella vulgaris, Pulsatilla halleri, Stachys germanica, and Thymus thracicus, were collected from the high-altitude zone of Mount Falakron. Two species, Hypericum perforatum and Potentilla recta, were collected from the low-altitude zone. Finally, Epilobium angustifolium and Hypericum olympicum were collected from the high-altitude zone of the Rhodope Mountain range, which is characterized by a fully continental climate. Mature inflorescences were collected from early July to early fall 2023. After collection, the material was dried at room temperature and seeds were extracted, cleaned, and counted.
Seed lots were subsequently stored under ambient laboratory conditions, approximately 20 ± 2 °C, 40–50% relative humidity, and natural dark–light cycles, for about two months until the initiation of germination experiments in late fall.

2.2. Seed Viability Testing

Seed viability level is crucial for developing a reproduction protocol, since it reveals the reproduction potential. Viability was determined using the tetrazolium chloride (TTZ) test, a relatively simple, rapid, and reliable method used prior to the typically lengthy germination test to identify metabolically active tissue, indicating a viable embryo capable of germination [69]. Four random samples (i.e., repetitions) of 25 seeds each were used for the estimation of seed viability for each species. Initially, the seeds were soaked in water for 12 h and then the testa of each seed was abraded with a dissecting needle, and the embryos were removed under a stereoscope. Seeds were grouped into the following two categories during seed dissection: filled (contained an embryo) and empty (without any gametophytic tissue). Empty seeds or seeds with atrophic embryos were considered non-viable. The viability of the extracted intact embryos was determined by staining them with a 1% w/v tetrazolium chloride solution (abbr. TTZ) [70]. Metabolically active tissue (so-called viable tissues) is stained red in the tetrazolium chloride solution [71]. Consequently, the percentage of non-germinable seeds is the sum of the percentages of empty seeds and those with non-viable embryo.

2.3. Seed Dormancy and Pre-Treatments

To release any potential dormancy, seeds underwent specific pre-treatments that were designed to break both physical and physiological dormancy. The treatments were selected based on both the literature review for the selected taxa (Table 2) but also on their simplicity and feasibility in common nursery settings. These included:
  • Cold stratification at 0 ± 1 °C for up to 6 months. CS is a widely used method for species with physiological dormancy. Seeds were put on moist sand and germination was monitored weekly.
  • Hormonal treatments: Seeds were soaked for 48 h in either gibberellic acid (GA3) or kinetin (KIN) solutions at concentrations of 500, 1500, or 2500 ppm. Seeds were imbibed in 5 mL of solution, between Whatman filter papers, in a 9 cm Petri dish. Stock solutions were diluted using HPLC-grade water, and pH was adjusted to near-neutral for kinetin treatments, which required NaOH for dissolution.
Following viability testing and pre-treatments, seeds were sown in Petri dishes filled with sterilized sand. Each treatment was tested with 4 replicates of 50 seeds per species. Germination tests were conducted in a controlled-environment chamber under alternating temperature: 25 °C/15 °C, 12 h light/12 h dark. The chamber’s conditions were selected based on late spring and early summer or early fall normal weather patterns at the species’ occurrence sites, reflecting the conditions during the most suitable period for seed germination and seedling establishment [29,72]. Untreated seeds served as controls, under the same experimental design described above, to assess baseline germination potential and to evaluate the effectiveness of each pre-treatment. Germination was recorded every 7 days for 12 weeks. Germination was defined as radicle emergence ≥ 2 mm. When the germination test ended, the non-germinated seeds were dissected, and any empty seed left was removed. Germination percentages were corrected based on the total number of full seeds per repetition. Seedlings were transplanted into paper pots for further observation. Once seedlings reached approximately 1 cm in height, they were moved to larger containers and acclimatized outdoors under nursery conditions.
Table 2. Summarization of the available species-specific and/or genus-specific literature information on the documented dormancy types and seed pre-treatments used for germination concerning the focal species of the current study.
Table 2. Summarization of the available species-specific and/or genus-specific literature information on the documented dormancy types and seed pre-treatments used for germination concerning the focal species of the current study.
GenusSpeciesDormancy TypePre-TreatmentReferences
AchilleaA.crithmifoliaPhysiological dormancyCold stratification[73]
AchilleaA. millefoliumLikely physiological dormancyChilling (cold dry storage), light +alternating temperature regimes[30,74,75]
EpilobiumE. angustifoliumNon-deep physiological dormancyDry after-ripening[76,77]
GeraniumG. macrorrhizum
G. sanguineum
Physical dormancy and physiological dormancyDry storage, cold stratification[78,79]
HypericumH. perforatumNon-deep physiological dormancyCold stratification, GA3 treatments[80,81]
PotentillaP. rectaNon-deep physiological dormancyAfter-ripening, cold stratification[82,83]
PrimulaP.verisPhysiological dormancyCold-moist stratification[84,85]
PrunellaP. vulgarisPhysiological dormancyGA3, cold stratification[86]
PulsatillaP. halleriMorphophysiological dormancyWarm + cold stratification[87]
SaponariaS. officinalisPhysiological dormancyCold stratification, scarification[88]
ScutellariaS. altissimaPhysiological dormancyCold stratification[89]
StachysS. germanicaPhysiological dormancyGA3, Kin, cold-moist stratification[90,91]
TeucriumT. montanumPhysiological dormancyCold stratification[92,93]
ThymusT. praecox
T. thracicus
Physiological dormancyCold stratification, light[30]

2.4. Data Analysis

Germination data were checked for normality and homogeneity using Shapiro–Wilk’s and Levene’s tests, respectively, and found to meet both assumptions. The effects of pre-treatments on seed germination were evaluated via one-way ANOVA, whereas differences in mean values were assessed using Tukey’s HSD test at 5% significance level.

3. Results

In the current work, eighteen native plant species from northeastern Greece were subjected to germination tests under eight pre-treatments: control, cold stratification, GA3 at three concentrations (500 ppm, 1500 ppm, 2500 ppm), and KIN at the same three concentrations. Table 3 presents the mean germination percentages for each treatment per species, along with the results of the post hoc analysis (Tukey’s HSD, p < 0.05). The embryo viability for each species is also included. The viability test (TTZ) verified high embryo viability in all examined species, with values ranging from 70% (e.g., Stachys germanica) to 100% (e.g., Achillea millefolium, Potentilla recta) (Figure 1).
Geranium macrorrhizum and G. sanguineum showed no germination throughout and they are not included in Table 3. Germination percentages varied significantly between treatments and species (Table 3). The control treatment resulted in the highest germination percentage in 9 of the 16 species, namely Hypericum sp. (78.5–90%), Potentilla recta (81.5%), Prunella vulgaris (79.25%), Scutellaria altissima (64.75%), Stachys germanica (63.75%), Thymus thracicus (79.25%), and T. praecox (81.75%) (Table 3). However, in most species, the number of germinated seeds was lower than the number of viable seeds recorded in the TTZ test; the germination percentages were generally close to or slightly lower than the percentages recorded for embryo viability (Table 3).
Cold stratification improved germination only in Achillea crithmifolia and A. millefolium (71.5% and 72.25%, respectively) that were relatively close to the recorded embryo viability. GA3 on the other hand enhanced dormancy release in species like Epilobium angustifolium (43.75%), Primula veris where seed germination rates were maximized (85.5%) after seed imbibition in 500 ppm GA3, and Teucrium montanum which reached 62.75% seed germination at 1500 ppm GA3 (Table 3, p < 0.05). Highly significant differences among GA3 treatments were recorded in Stachys germanica, Scutellaria altissima, and Achillea millefolium (Table 3, p < 0.05).
Kinetin treatments had a generally lower impact, with Pulsatilla helleri and Saponaria officinalis being the only two species that showed increased seed germination (68.5% and 32%, respectively) with a more profound effect on P. helleri (Table 3, p < 0.05).
Based on the above results, specific seed pre-treatments are recommended, tailored for each species according to the suspected dormancy type (Table 4).

4. Discussion

Provenance plays a significant role in plant establishment and performance, particularly in stress-prone environments such as those of semi-arid Mediterranean climates. Locally adapted genotypes often present higher fitness in conditions like their occurrence range as they often possess adaptive traits [94]. The use of such locally adapted planting material can improve establishment success, reduce crop failures, and minimize the need for intensive management inputs [95]. Therefore, they are usually more suitable for cultivation and bio-economic applications close to their native range [96].
Dormancy provides multiple benefits to seeds [30]. The employed strategy by many plant species is that dormancy release and seed germination occur with the onset of the season during which the risks for seedling death are lowest, conditions for seedling growth are optimal, and therefore seedling establishment is maximized [30]. Numerous studies conducted at different scales, from microhabitats to biomes, have demonstrated that changes from unfavorable to favorable environments for germination can trigger dormancy release [97].
Physiological dormancy is the most common type of dormancy, especially in relatively drier climates and with an increasing range of seasonal temperature variation [98], such as the Mediterranean climate. This type of climate is characterized by high seasonality with hot and dry summers and cold-wet winters. On the other hand, plant reproduction must occur during the period with favorable conditions. Therefore, germination of low-altitude species occurs in the wet season, in fall, and the growing season ends just before the onset of summer. For species within this ecological context, dry after-ripening may be considered a favorable seed treatment for successful germination ex situ [99].
On the other hand, Mediterranean mountain weather presents winter frost at high elevations. However, its duration is usually short. Plants of high-altitude environments usually produce seeds that need overwintering for dormancy release to germinate in the spring following seed dispersal [100]. In these conditions, the favorable period for regeneration is soon after snowmelt in spring/early summer [101]. However, seeds of this origin may germinate readily ex situ, without any treatment, as they seem to be physiologically prepared for rapid germination [99]. A modified germination strategy is also apparent in high-altitude Mediterranean plants which are generally positively affected by a cold-wet stratification pre-treatment [101].
The sixteen native and potentially underutilized plant species that were used in the present experiment presented clear differences in seed dormancy types. For most species, the highest germination percentages were recorded in the control, suggesting that a period of after-ripening was sufficient to overcome dormancy. After-ripening, the dry storage of seeds at room temperature, is a well-documented mechanism for breaking non-deep physiological dormancy. After-ripening usually causes physiological and biochemical changes by reducing embryo-growth inhibitors, such as abscisic acid (ABA), which gradually release dormancy [30,31]. In accordance with these ecological patterns, the species studied exhibited dormancy-breaking requirements that closely reflected their altitudinal origin. Low-altitude species, such as Hypericum perforatum and Potentilla recta, presented high germination percentages after simple after-ripening, indicating non-deep physiological dormancy as referred by Picciau et al. [99]. Seeds of species collected in mid-altitude also presented physiological dormancy which, according to the results, may have been deeper in some cases. Scutellaria altissima and Thymus praecox presented high germination percentages without any treatment, implying that after-ripening was sufficient to overcome dormancy. On the other hand, Achillea crithmifolia and A. millefolium demanded cold stratification to promote germination. In addition, some species required hormonal treatment for dormancy release (Primula veris, Teucrium montanum, and Saponaria officinalis). Seeds of species of higher altitudes, such as Hypericum maculatum, Prunella vulgaris, Stachys germanica, and Thymus thracicus also germinated successfully following after-ripening as referred by Rosbakh et al. [98]. However, Epilobium angustifolium and Pulsatilla halleri required hormonal treatment to break dormancy, indicating that their seeds have deeper physiological dormancy.
The current results suggest that in most of the species studied herein, dormancy release can be achieved without complex pre-treatments, which is a rather useful trait for agronomic exploitation. For example, several species in our study such as Prunella vulgaris, Potentila recta, and Scutellaria altissima, that have been previously described as possessing seed physiological dormancy [82,86], showed their highest germination in control treatment. Thus, according to the current results, seed dormancy in P. vulgaris, P. recta, and S. altissima was non-deep as simple after-ripening was sufficient to overcome it, making them particularly suitable for agronomic exploitation as they do not require costly or complex pre-treatments. Hypericum maculatum H. olympicum, H. perforatum, Stachys germanica, Thymus thracicus, and T. praecox also presented their highest germination in the control, in contrast with earlier reports describing physiological dormancy [80,81,90]. This response highlights the suitability of the above species for domestication, since they can be propagated easily, after short-time storage, and without additional pre-germination treatments.
On the contrary, Achillea crithmifolia and A. millefolium required cold stratification to maximize germination. Cold stratification, which simulates winter conditions, is effective for species with intermediate or deep-seed physiological dormancy. When seeds remain in low temperatures, ABA content is reduced while gibberellin biosynthesis is increased, triggering germination [31,102,103]. The Achillea species studied herein showed strong response to stratification, which reinforces their classification into deeper physiological dormancy classes and highlights the necessity of simulating winter conditions to achieve germination. This concurs with published reports, where physiological dormancy and responsiveness to stratification are well documented [73,74].
The use of various hormones as a pre-treatment has been adopted as a method of replacing the time-consuming stratification often required to initiate the germination of physiologically dormant seeds. The hormones are naturally present in seeds and appear to be crucial for dormancy breaking and initiating germination [103]. It is commonly thought that dormancy release is due to an increase in levels of cytokinin (KIN) or gibberellic acid (GA3) or both, although their precise mode of action is still unclear [104]. Gibberellins promote embryo growth potential [102] while cytokinins stimulate germination, in certain species by modulating ABA sensitivity and enhancing cell division [105]. However, imbibing the seeds in a hormone solution seems to have a positive effect on dormancy removal in several species, while, at the same time, germination is more uniform. It has been observed that cytokinins, in some cases, break seed dormancy and stimulate germination by counteracting the inhibitory effects of other hormones like ABA, which promotes dormancy [105]. This was particularly evident in species such as Primula veris, Pulsatilla halleri and Teucrium montanum, where GA3 treatment significantly improved germination compared to the control and stratification treatments, although not always close to the observed frequencies of viable embryos. These results are consistent with deep physiological dormancy reported for these species [84,85,92,106,107,108], that cannot always be released effectively. On the contrary, although Epilobium angustifolium is referred to present non-deep physiological dormancy that can be released through after-ripening [76,77], in the current study it required GA3 to achieve a relatively medium germination percentage compared to the embryo viability percentage.
On the other hand, Geranium macrorrhizum and G. sanguineum that presented zero germination in all treatments, clearly require more complex or yet unidentified dormancy-breaking treatments. This observation matches reports on the genus, where complex physical dormancy and physiological dormancy have been described [78]. Physical dormancy in seeds is typically broken by heat exposure, physical scarification (such as scratching or abrasion), or chemical scarification, which degrades the impermeable seed coat and allow water and gases to penetrate, initiating germination. Physiological dormancy, on the other hand, may require extended or yet undefined periods of cold stratification to be effectively released [30]. Similarly, Saponaria officinalis presented a relatively low germination percentage after immersion in 500 ppm KIN [88]. The reason for this is unknown as, to our knowledge, no published data are available on the germination requirements of S. officinalis. Further investigation is required to determine whether the species exhibits physical dormancy or a combination of physical and physiological dormancy. In such cases, pretreatments involving scarification (mechanical or chemical, or heat) to weaken the seed coat, should be tested prior to the application of cold stratification or hormonal treatments aimed at releasing both types of dormancy. Such species should be further investigated to be proposed for agronomic use, as their propagation remains challenging.
Although many species reached high germination frequencies, these values often remained lower than the viability percentages measured with the tetrazolium (TTZ) test (e.g., Thymus spp.) This indicates that a fraction of seeds may possess deeper levels of dormancy that was not released by the tested treatments. Seeds with such dormancy types can persist in the soil and contribute to the persistent seed bank, a strategy that spreads germination over the years [109].
From an agronomic point of view, species exhibiting high germination without any treatment can be considered strong candidates for cultivation, as they can be propagated efficiently without specialized infrastructure (nine species herein that reached high seed germination rates in the control are shown in Table 3). Similarly, species responding to GA3 imbibition or stratification (e.g., A. crithmifolia) also have potential for agronomic use as the pre-treatments are easy, relatively cheap, not time consuming, and do not demand any specific infrastructure. Species whose seeds demand cold stratification need some simple equipment (fridge) but can also over-winter in the open.
The results of the present study demonstrate that several native and underutilized species from northeastern Greece present high germination potential and can therefore be prospective candidates for domestication and agronomic exploitation. This will enhance the aim of strengthening innovation and sustainability in the agri-food sector. Species that present high germination percentages in our trials can be prioritized for pilot cultivation and gradual integration into agri-food value chains. The use of locally adapted germplasm is of particular importance, as it enhances adaptation under the climatic conditions of a given region, such as eastern Macedonia and Thrace, northern Greece, in the current study. These species can contribute to regional development and competitiveness as well as to the locally adapted agronomic systems.

5. Conclusions

The present study reports the germination capacity of eighteen native plant species from northeastern Greece within the context of domestication and sustainable utilization of local phytogenetic resources. The integration of such species into cultivation systems, as locally adapted resources, could provide new opportunities to produce antioxidant-rich products, enhance regional agricultural diversification and support local economies.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.V., C.M. and T.M.; methodology, G.V., T.M., I.A., C.M. and E.K.; software, G.V., C.M. and E.K.; validation, G.V. and E.K.; formal analysis, G.V., T.M. and C.M.; investigation, G.V., T.M., I.A. and C.M.; resources, G.V., T.M. and E.K.; data curation, G.V., T.M. and E.K.; writing—original draft preparation, G.V., T.M., I.A. and C.M.; writing—review and editing, G.V., T.M. and E.K.; visualization, G.V., T.M. and E.K.; supervision, G.V., T.M. and E.K.; project administration, G.V. and T.M.; funding acquisition, G.V., T.M. and E.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

All data are presented in this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
GA3Gibberellin
TTZTetrazolium chloride
KINKinetin/cytokinin
CSCold stratification
ABAAbscisic acid

References

  1. Reuter, S.; Gupta, S.C.; Chaturvedi, M.M.; Aggarwal, B.B. Oxidative stress, inflammation, and cancer: How are they linked? Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2010, 49, 1603–1616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Pham-Huy, L.A.; He, H.; Pham-Huy, C. Free radicals, antioxidants in disease and health. Int. J. Biomed. Sci. 2008, 4, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chaudhary, P.; Janmeda, P.; Docea, A.O.; Yeskaliyeva, B.; AbdullRazis, A.F.; Modu, B.; Calina, D.; Sharifi-Rad, J. Oxidative stress, free radicals and antioxidants: Potential crosstalk in the pathophysiology of human diseases. Front. Chem. 2023, 11, 1158198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Shahidi, F.; Ambigaipalan, P. Phenolics and polyphenolics in foods, beverages and spices: Antioxidant activity and health effects—A review. J. Funct. Foods 2015, 18, 820–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lourenço, S.C.; Moldão-Martins, M.; Alves, V.D. Antioxidants of Natural Plant Origins: From Sources to Food Industry Applications. Molecules 2019, 24, 4132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gulcin, İ. Antioxidants: A comprehensive review. Arch. Toxicol. 2025, 99, 1893–1997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Vallano, A.; Pontes, C. Escalating costs of innovative medicines: Perspective and proposals. Front. Public Health 2024, 12, 1449707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, B.; Tang, X.; Le, G. Dietary Habits and Metabolic Health. Nutrients 2023, 15, 3975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Manessis, G.; Kalogianni, A.I.; Lazou, T.; Moschovas, M.; Bossis, I.; Gelasakis, A.I. Plant-Derived Natural Antioxidants in Meat and Meat Products. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Chauhan, K.; Rao, A. Clean-label alternatives for food preservation: An emerging trend. Heliyon 2024, 10, e35815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kim, M.; Bae, S.M.; Yoo, Y.; Park, J.; Jeong, J.Y. Clean-Label Strategies for the Replacement of Nitrite, Ascorbate, and Phosphate in Meat Products: A Review. Foods 2025, 14, 2442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority). Scientific Opinion on the re-evaluation of butylated hydroxyanisole—BHA (E 320) as a food additive. EFSA J. 2011, 9, 2392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Food and Drug Administration. Novel Drug Approvals for 2023. 2023. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/drugs/novel-drug-approvals-fda/novel-drug-approvals-2023 (accessed on 10 June 2025).
  14. Sbardelotto, P.R.; Balbinot-Alfaro, E.; da Rocha, M.; Alfaro, A.T. Natural alternatives for processed meat: Legislation, markets, consumers, opportunities and challenges. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 63, 10303–10318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Santos-Sánchez, N.F.; Salas-Coronado, R.; Villanueva-Cañongo, C.; Hernández-Carlos, B. Antioxidant Compounds and Their Antioxidant Mechanism; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Karapatzak, E.; Krigas, N.; Ganopoulos, I.; Papanastasi, K.; Kyrkas, D.; Yfanti, P.; Nikisianis, N.; Karydas, A.; Manthos, I.; Kosma, I.S.; et al. Documenting Greek Indigenous Germplasm of Cornelian Cherry (Cornus mas L.) for Sustainable Utilization: Molecular Authentication, Asexual Propagation, and Phytochemical Evaluation. Plants 2022, 11, 1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Karapatzak, E.; Dichala, O.; Papanastasi, K.; Manthos, I.; Ganopoulos, I.; Karydas, A.; Badeka, A.V.; Kosma, I.S.; Kyrkas, D.; Yfanti, P.; et al. A Multifaceted Evaluation Approach for Greek Native Neglected and Underutilized Forest Fruit Trees and Shrubs as Natural Sources of Antioxidants: Consolidating the Framework for Their Sustainable Agronomic Exploitation. Plants 2023, 12, 1642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Gill, S.S.; Tuteja, N. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2010, 48, 909–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sharma, P.; Jha, A.B.; Dubey, R.S.; Pessarakli, M. Reactive oxygen species, oxidative damage, and antioxidative defense mechanism in plants under stressful conditions. J. Bot. 2012, 2012, 217037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Krigas, N.; Tsoktouridis, G.; Anestis, I.; Khabbach, A.; Libiad, M.; Megdiche-Ksouri, W.; Ghrabi-Gammar, Z.; Lamchouri, F.; Tsiripidis, I.; Tsiafouli, M.A.; et al. Exploring the Potential of Neglected Local Endemic Plants of Three Mediterranean Regions in the Ornamental Sector: Value Chain Feasibility and Readiness Timescale for Their Sustainable Exploitation. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bastos Lima, M.G.; Palme, U. The Bioeconomy–Biodiversity Nexus: Enhancing or Undermining Nature’s Contributions to People? Conservation 2022, 2, 7–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Díaz, S.; Fargione, J.; Chapin, F.S., III; Tilman, D. Biodiversity Loss Threatens Human Well-Being. PLoS Biol. 2006, 4, e277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Tomou, E.-M.; Fraskou, P.; Dimakopoulou, K.; Dariotis, E.; Krigas, N.; Skaltsa, H. Chemometric analysis evidencing the variability in the composition of essential oils in 10 Salvia species from different taxonomic sections or phylogenetic clades. Molecules 2024, 29, 1547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Bourgou, S.; Ben Haj Jilani, I.; Karous, O.; Megdiche-Ksouri, W.; Ghrabi-Gammar, Z.; Libiad, M.; Khabbach, A.; El Haissoufi, M.; Lamchouri, F.; Greveniotis, V.; et al. Medicinal-Cosmetic Potential of the Local Endemic Plants of Crete (Greece), Northern Morocco and Tunisia: Priorities for Conservation and Sustainable Exploitation of Neglected and Underutilized Phytogenetic Resources. Biology 2021, 10, 1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Leonti, M.; Verpoorte, R. Traditional Mediterranean and European herbal medicines. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2017, 199, 161–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Karapatzak, E.; Papagrigoriou, T.; Papanastasi, K.; Dichala, O.; Karydas, A.; Nikisianis, N.; Patakioutas, G.; Lazari, D.; Krigas, N.; Maloupa, E. From the Wild to the Field: Documentation, Propagation, Pilot Cultivation, Fertilization, and Phytochemical Evaluation of the Neglected and Underutilized Amelanchier ovalis Medik. (Rosaceae). Plants 2023, 12, 1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Marcelino, S.; Hamdane, S.; Gaspar, P.D.; Paço, A. Sustainable Agricultural Practices for the Production of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants: Evidence and Recommendations. Sustainability 2023, 15, 14095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Papagrigoriou, T.; Iliadi, P.; Mitić, M.N.; Mrmošanin, J.M.; Papanastasi, K.; Karapatzak, E.; Maloupa, E.; Gkourogianni, A.V.; Badeka, A.V.; Krigas, N.; et al. Wild-Growing and Conventionally or Organically Cultivated Sambucus nigra Germplasm: Fruit Phytochemical Profile, Total Phenolic Content, Antioxidant Activity, and Leaf Elements. Plants 2023, 12, 1701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hatzilazarou, S.; Pipinis, E.; Kostas, S.; Stagiopoulou, R.; Gitsa, K.; Dariotis, E.; Avramakis, M.; Samartza, I.; Plastiras, I.; Kriemadi, E.; et al. Influence of Temperature on Seed Germination of Five Wild-Growing Tulipa Species of Greece Associated with Their Ecological Profiles: Implications for Conservation and Cultivation. Plants 2023, 12, 1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Baskin, C.C.; Baskin, J.M. Seeds: Ecology, Biogeography, and Evolution of Dormancy and Germination; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Finch-Savage, W.E.; Leubner-Metzger, G. Seed dormancy and the control of germination. New Phytol. 2006, 171, 501–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kildisheva, O.A.; Dixon, K.W.; Silveira, F.A.; Chapman, T.; Di Sacco, A.; Mondoni, A.; Turner, S.R.; Cross, A.T. Dormancy and germination: Making every seed count in restoration. Restor. Ecol. 2020, 28, 256–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Grigoriadou, K.; Krigas, N.; Lazari, D.; Maloupa, E. Sustainable use of mediterranean medicinal-aromatic plants. In Feed Additives; Florou-Paneri, P., Christaki, E., Giannenas, I., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2020; pp. 57–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zamani, S.; Fathi, M.; Ebadi, M.T.; Máthé, Á. Global Trade of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants. A Review. J. Agric. Food Res. 2025, 21, 101910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. EEA. Climate Change Adaptation in the Agriculture Sector in Europe. EEA Report No 4/2019. 2019. Available online: https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/analysis/publications/cc-adaptation-agriculture (accessed on 10 July 2025).
  36. Saadat, S.; Rajabi, M.; Boskabady, M.H. Experimental and clinical studies on pharmacological actions of the genus Achillea: A comprehensive and updated review. Avicenna J. Phytomed. 2024, 14, 530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bouteche, A.; Touil, A.; Narimane, S. Phytochemical composition, ethnomedicinal uses, and pharmacological properties of Achillea ligustica All.: A review. J. Res. Pharm. 2025, 28, 313–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Aćimović, M.; Vujisić, L.; Lončar, B.; Ivanović, S.; Rat, M. Headspace Volatile Profiles of Achillea Species: A. aspleniifolia, A. crithmifolia, A. filipendulina, and A. virescens. Chem. Biodivers. 2025, 22, e202401876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Villalva, M.; Silvan, J.M.; Alarcón-Cavero, T.; Villanueva-Bermejo, D.; Jaime, L.; Santoyo, S.; Martinez-Rodriguez, A.J. Antioxidant, Anti-Inflammatory, and Antibacterial Properties of an Achillea millefolium L. Extract and Its Fractions Obtained by Supercritical Anti-Solvent Fractionation against Helicobacter pylori. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Jaganjac, M.; SredojaTisma, V.; Zarkovic, N. Short Overview of Some Assays for the Measurement of Antioxidant Activity of Natural Products and Their Relevance in Dermatology. Molecules 2021, 26, 5301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Popov, S.; Smirnov, V.; Kvashninova, E.; Khlopin, V.; Vityazev, F.; Golovchenko, V. Isolation, Chemical Characterization and Antioxidant Activity of Pectic Polysaccharides of Fireweed (Epilobium angustifolium L.). Molecules 2021, 26, 7290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Schepetkin, I.A.; Kirpotina, L.N.; Jakiw, L.; Khlebnikov, A.I.; Blaskovich, C.L.; Jutila, M.A.; Quinn, M.T. Immunomodulatory activity of oenothein B isolated from Epilobium angustifolium. J. Immun. 2009, 183, 6754–6766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kiss, A.K.; Bazylko, A.; Filipek, A.; Granica, S.; Jaszewska, E.; Kiarszys, U.; Kośmider, A.; Piwowarski, J. Oenothein B’s contribution to the anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activity of Epilobium sp. Phytomedicine 2011, 18, 557–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Miliauskas, G.; van Beek, T.A.; Venskutonis, P.R.; Linssen, J.P.H.; de Waard, P. Antioxidative activity of Geranium macrorrhizum. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2004, 218, 253–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Abarova, S.; Tancheva, L.; Nikolov, R.; Serkedjieva, J.; Pavlova, E.; Bramanti, A.; Nicoletti, F.; Tzvetkov, N.T. Preventive Effect of a Polyphenol-Rich Extract from Geranium sanguineum L. on Hepatic Drug Metabolism in Influenza Infected Mice. Sci. Pharm. 2020, 88, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zheleva-Dimitrova, D.; Nedialkov, P.; Kitanov, G. Radical scavenging and antioxidant activities of methanolic extracts from Hypericum species growing in Bulgaria. Pharmacogn. Mag. 2010, 6, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Orčić, D.Z.; Mimica-Dukić, N.M.; Francišković, M.M.; Petrović, S.S.; Jovin, E.Đ. Antioxidant activity relationship of phenolic compounds in Hypericum perforatum L. Chem. Cent. J. 2011, 5, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Suryawanshi, M.V.; Gujarathi, P.P.; Mulla, T.; Bagban, I. Hypericum perforatum: A comprehensive review on pharmacognosy, preclinical studies, putative molecular mechanism, and clinical studies in neurodegenerative diseases. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Arch. Pharmacol. 2024, 397, 3803–3818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Zheleva-Dimitrova, D.; Nedialkov, P.; Kitanov, G. Benzophenones and flavonoids from Hypericum maculatum and their antioxidant activities. Nat. Prod. Res. 2012, 26, 1576–1583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kladar, N.; Božin, B.; Bijelić, K.; Bogavac, M.; Karaman, M.; SrđenovićČonić, B.; Rat, M.; Anačkov, G. Biological Activity of Genus Hypericum Sect. Hypericum Species—H. tetrapterum, H. maculatum subsp. immaculatum, H. triquetrifolium. Molecules 2023, 28, 6218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Augustynowicz, D.; Latté, K.P.; Tomczyk, M. Recent phytochemical and pharmacological advances in the genus Potentilla L. sensu lato—An update covering the period from 2009 to 2020. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2021, 266, 113412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Bączek, K.; Przybył, J.L.; Mirgos, M.; Kosakowska, O.; Szymborska-Sandhu, I.; Węglarz, Z. Phenolics in Primula veris L. and P. elatior (L.) Hill raw materials. Int. J. Anal. Chem. 2017, 1, 2871579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Tarapatskyy, M.; Gumienna, A.; Sowa, P.; Kapusta, I.; Puchalski, C. Bioactive Phenolic Compounds from Primula veris L.: Influence of the Extraction Conditions and Purification. Molecules 2021, 26, 997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Stefanis, I.; Chatzopoulou, P.; Krigas, N.; Karioti, A. Exploring the Chemical Content of Primula veris L. subsp. veris Wild-Growing Populations along a Climate Gradient: An HPLC-PDA-MS Quality Assessment of Flowers, Leaves and Roots for Sustainable Exploitation. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Chintiroglou, P.I.; Krigas, N.; Chatzopoulou, P.; Karioti, A. Development and validation of an HPLC method for the analysis of flowers of wild-growing Primula veris from Epirus, Greece. Planta Med. 2021, 87, 1219–1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Feng, L.; Jia, X.; Zhu, M.-M.; Chen, Y.; Shi, F. Antioxidant Activities of Total Phenols of Prunella vulgaris L. in Vitro and in Tumor-bearing Mice. Molecules 2010, 15, 9145–9156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Pan, J.; Wang, H.; Chen, Y. Prunella vulgaris L.—A Review of its Ethnopharmacology, Phytochemistry, Quality Control and Pharmacological Effects. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 903171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Danova, K.; Markovska, Y.; Dimitrov, D.; Kapchina-Toteva, V. In vitro culture of Balkan endemic and rare Pulsatilla species—Secondary metabolite production and phenol & flavonoid determination. Bot. Serb. 2009, 33, 497–506. Available online: https://botanicaserbica.bio.bg.ac.rs/arhiva/pdf/2009_33_2_497_full.pdf (accessed on 3 July 2025).
  59. Charalambous, D.; Christoforou, M.; Christou, K.; Christou, M.; Ververis, A.; Andreou, M.; Christodoulou, K.; Koutsoulidou, A.; Papachrysostomou, C.; Pantelidou, M. Saponin and Phenolic Composition and Assessment of Biological Activities of Saponaria officinalis L. Root Extracts. Plants 2024, 13, 1982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Grzegorczyk-Karolak, I.; Kuźma, Ł.; Wysokińska, H. Study on the chemical composition and antioxidant activity of extracts from shoot culture and regenerated plants of Scutellaria altissima L. Acta Physiol. Plant 2015, 37, 1736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Grzegorczyk-Karolak, I.; Gołąb, K.; Gburek, J.; Wysokińska, H.; Matkowski, A. Inhibition of Advanced Glycation End-Product Formation and Antioxidant Activity by Extracts and Polyphenols from Scutellariaalpina L. and S. altissima L. Molecules 2016, 21, 739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Benedec, D.; Oniga, I.; Hanganu, D.; Tiperciuc, B.; Nistor, A.; Vlase, A.-M.; Vlase, L.; Pușcaș, C.; Duma, M.; Login, C.C.; et al. Stachys Species: Comparative Evaluation of Phenolic Profile and Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Potential. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 1644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Pashova, S.; Karcheva-Bahchevanska, D.; Ivanov, K.; Ivanova, S. Genus Stachys—Phytochemistry, Traditional Medicinal Uses, and Future Perspectives. Molecules 2024, 29, 5345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Bektasevic, M.; Jurin, M.; Roje, M.; Politeo, O. Phytochemical Profile, Antioxidant Activity and Cholinesterase Inhibition Potential of Essential Oil and Extracts of Teucrium montanum from Bosnia and Herzegovina. Separations 2023, 10, 421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Kadifkova Panovska, T.; Kulevanova, S.; Stefova, M. In vitro antioxidant activity of some Teucrium species (Lamiaceae). Acta Pharm. 2005, 55, 207–214. Available online: https://hrcak.srce.hr/16758 (accessed on 3 July 2025). [PubMed]
  66. Dong, Y.; Wei, Z.; Yang, R.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, M.; Bai, H.; Mo, M.; Yao, C.; Li, H.; Shi, L. Chemical Compositions of Essential Oil Extracted from Eight Thyme Species and Potential Biological Functions. Plants 2023, 12, 4164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Pandur, E.; Micalizzi, G.; Mondello, L.; Horváth, A.; Sipos, K.; Horváth, G. Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.) Essential Oils Prepared at Different Plant Phenophases on Pseudomonas aeruginosa LPS-Activated THP-1 Macrophages. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Petrović, N.V.; Petrović, S.S.; Džamić, A.M.; Ćirić, A.D.; Ristić, M.S.; Milovanović, S.L.; Petrović, S.D. Chemical composition, antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of Thymus praecox supercritical extracts. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2016, 110, 117–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Copeland, L.O.; McDonald, M.B. Principles of Seed Science and Technology, 4th ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. ISTA. International Rules for Seed Testing. Seed Sci. Technol. 1999, 27, 333. Available online: https://www.seedtest.org/en/publications/international-rules-seed-testing-1168.html (accessed on 12 September 2024).
  71. Aosa, S. Tetrazolium Testing Handbook; Association of Official Seed Analysts and Society of Commercial Seed Technologists: Washington, DC, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  72. Mondoni, A.; Rossi, G.; Orsenigo, S.; Probert, R.J. Climate warming could shift the timing of seed germination in alpine plants. Ann. Bot. 2012, 110, 155–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Nikolić, B.; Braunović, S.; Jovanović, F.; Eremija, S.; Marković, M.; Rakonjac, L. Seed germination tests in Achillea genus from the Pirot County (Southeastern Serbia). Ethnobotany 2022, 2, 145–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Zarghani, H.; Mijani, S.; Eskandari, S. Temperature Effects on the Seed Germination of Some Perennial and Annual Species of Asteraceae Family. Plant Breed. Seed Sci. 2014, 69, 3–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Bostock, S.J. Seed germination strategies of five perennial weeds. Oecologia 1978, 36, 113–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Myerscough, P.J. Epilobium angustifolium L. J. Ecol. 1980, 68, 169–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Broderick, D.H. The biology of Canadian weeds: 93. Epilobium angustifolium L. (Onagraceae). Can. J. Plant Sci. 1990, 70, 1013–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Meisert, A. Physical dormancy in Geraniaceae seeds. Seed Sci. Res. 2002, 12, 121–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Vandelook, F.; Van Assche, J.A. A combined physical and physiological dormancy controls seasonal seedling emergence of Geranium robertianum. Plant Biol. 2010, 12, 765–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. García, F.; Huertas, M.; Mora, E.; Peña, B.; Varela, F.; González-Benito, M.E. Hypericum perforatum L. Seed Germination: Interpopulation Variationand Effect of Light, Temperature, Presowing Treatments and Seed Desiccation. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2006, 53, 1187–1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Campbell, H.M. Germination, emergence and seedling growth of Hypericum perforatum L. Weed Res. 1985, 25, 259–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Baskin, J.M.; Baskin, C.C. Role of temperature and light in the germination ecology of buried seeds of Potentilla recta. Ann. Appl. Biol. 1990, 117, 611–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Kołodziejek, J.; Patykowski, J.; Wala, M. Dormancy, germination, and sensitivity to salinity stress in five species of Potentilla (Rosaceae). Botany 2019, 97, 452–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Yankova-Tsvetkova, E.; Petrova, M.; Grigorova, I.; Traykova, B.; Stanilova, M. The Establishment of an Ex Situ Collection of Primula veris in Bulgaria. Plants 2022, 11, 3018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Grigoriadou, K.; Sarropoulou, V.; Krigas, N.; Maloupa, E. In vitro propagation of Primula veris L. subsp. veris (Primulaceae): A valuable medicinal plant with ornamental potential. Int. J. Bot. St. 2020, 5, 532–539. Available online: https://www.botanyjournals.com/assets/archives/2020/vol5issue5/5-5-43-743.pdf (accessed on 18 May 2025).
  86. Campbell-Martínez, G.; Olsson, R.; Hersey, A.; Meikle, S.; Freitag, K. Native seed germination trials at the Rae Selling Berry Seed Bank. In Proceedings of the International Plant Propagators Society, Western Region, 2023; Available online: https://archives.pdx.edu/ds/psu/43841 (accessed on 20 July 2025).
  87. Park, K.; Lee, S.Y.; Ji, B.; Jang, B.K.; Lee, H.; Lee, H.; Song, S.-K.; Cho, J.S. Seed longevity and germinability of Pulsatilla dahurica (Fisch. ex DC.) spreng after storage and accelerated aging test. Hortic. Sci. Technol. 2022, 40, 147–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Fišer Pečnikar, Ž.; Balant, M.; Glasnović, P.; Surina, B. Seed dormancy and germination of the rare, high elevation Balkan endemic Cerastium dinaricum (Caryophyllaceae). Biologia 2018, 73, 937–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Kim, J.H.; Kwon, H.C.; Lee, S.Y. Seed Dormancy and Germination Characteristics of Scutellaria indica L. var. coccinea ST Kim & ST Lee, an Endemic Species Found on Jeju Island, South Korea. Horticulturae 2025, 11, 1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Güleryüz, G.; Kırmızı, S.; Arslan, H.; Sakar, F.S. Dormancy and germination in Stachys germanica L. subsp. bithynica (Boiss.) Bhattacharjee seeds: Effects of short-time moist chilling and plant growth regulators. Flora Morphol. Distrib. Funct. Ecol. Plants 2011, 206, 943–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Ismaili, S.E.; Maurady, A.; Lachkar, M.; Britel, M.R.; Bakali, A.H. Effect of temperature and different pre-treatments on seed germination of Stachys mouretii Batt. & Pit. J. Appl. Res. Med. Aromat. Plants 2023, 32, 100438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Benvenuti, S.; Ceccarini, L.; Macchia, M. Germination ecology of Teucrium marum L.: An endemic species of the Tuscany Arcipelago. Acta Hortic. 2006, 723, 315–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Kostas, S.; Hatzilazarou, S.; Pipinis, E.; Bourgou, S.; Ben Haj Jilani, I.; Ben Othman, W.; Megdiche-Ksouri, W.; Ghrabi-Gammar, Z.; Libiad, M.; Khabbach, A.; et al. DNA Barcoding, GIS-Facilitated Seed Germination and Pilot Cultivation of Teucrium luteum subsp. gabesianum (Lamiaceae), a Tunisian Local Endemic with Potential Medicinal and Ornamental Value. Biology 2022, 11, 462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Hereford, J. A quantitative survey of local adaptation and fitness trade-offs. Am. Nat. 2009, 173, 579–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Joshi, J.; Schmid, B.; Caldeira, M.C.; Dimitrakopoulos, P.G.; Good, J.; Harris, R.; Hector, A.; Huss-Danell, K.; Jumpponen, A.; Minns, A.; et al. Local adaptation enhances performance of common plant species. Ecol. Lett. 2001, 4, 536–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Mortlock, B.W. Local seed for revegetation. Ecol. Manag. Restor. 2000, 1, 93–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Baskin, J.M.; Baskin, C.C. The great diversity in kinds of seed dormancy: A revision of the Nikolaeva–Baskin classification system for primary seed dormancy. Seed Sci. Res. 2021, 31, 249–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Rosbakh, S.; Carta, A.; Fernández-Pascual, E.; Phartyal, S.S.C.; Dayrell, R.L.; Mattana, E.; Saatkamp, A.; Vandelook, F.; Baskin, J.; Baskin, C. Global seed dormancy patterns are driven by macroclimate but not fire regime. New Phytol. 2023, 240, 555–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Picciau, R.; Pritchard, H.W.; Mattana, E.; Bacchetta, G. Thermal thresholds for seed germination in Mediterranean species are higher in mountain compared with lowland areas. Seed Sci. Res. 2019, 29, 44–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Giménez-Benavides, L.; Escudero, A.; Pérez-García, F. Seed germination of high mountain Mediterranean species: Altitudinal, interpopulation and interannual variability. Ecol. Res. 2005, 20, 433–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Mattana, E.; Carta, A.; Fernández-Pascual, E.; Keeley, J.E.; Pritchard, H.W. Climate change and plant regeneration from seeds in Mediterranean regions of the Northern Hemisphere. In Plant Regeneration from Seeds; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2021; pp. 101–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Bewley, J.D.; Bradford, K.J.; Hilhorst, H.W.M.; Nonogaki, H. Seeds: Physiology of Development, Germination and Dormancy; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Kucera, B.; Cohn, M.A.; Leubner-Metzger, G. Plant hormone interactions during seed dormancy release and germination. Seed Sci. Res. 2005, 15, 281–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Shu, K.; Liu, X.D.; Xie, Q.; He, Z.H. Two faces of one seed: Hormonal regulation of dormancy and germination. Mol. Plant 2016, 9, 34–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Guan, C.; Wang, X.; Feng, J.; Hong, S.; Liang, Y.; Ren, B.; Zuo, J. Cytokinin antagonizes abscisic acid-mediated inhibition of cotyledon greening by promoting the degradation of abscisic acid insensitive5 protein in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2014, 164, 1515–1526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Yoo, Y.K.; Roh, Y.S.; Yuan, T.; Roh, M.S. Germination of Pulsatilla cernua var. koreana seeds influenced by temperature, light, and GA3 treatments. Acta Hortic. 2020, 1291, 183–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Yuan, T.; Wei, Q.; Bauchan, G. Germination of Pulsatilla seeds as influenced by seed morphology, moist 5 °C and gibberellin (GA3) treatment, and detection of nickel in seeds. HortScience 2019, 54, 2015–2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Nadjafi, F.; Bannayan, M.; Tabrizi, L.; Rastgoo, M. Seed germination and dormancy breaking techniques for Ferula gummosa and Teucrium polium. J. Arid. Environ. 2006, 64, 542–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Thompson, K.; Ceriani, R.M.; Bakker, J.P.; Bekker, R.M. Are seed dormancy and persistence in soil related? Seed Sci. Res. 2003, 13, 97–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Indicative stereoscope photos of species’ cleaned seeds (left) with their respective cases of viable embryos stained with 1% w/v tetrazolium chloride (right) for eight focal species. Embryos that are stained red are viable, whereas embryos not stained are considered non-viable. The species presented are (from top to bottom) Achillea millefolium, Epilobium angustifolium, Hypericum perforatum, Potentilla recta, Primula veris, Stachys germanica, Teucrium montanum, and Thymus praecox.
Figure 1. Indicative stereoscope photos of species’ cleaned seeds (left) with their respective cases of viable embryos stained with 1% w/v tetrazolium chloride (right) for eight focal species. Embryos that are stained red are viable, whereas embryos not stained are considered non-viable. The species presented are (from top to bottom) Achillea millefolium, Epilobium angustifolium, Hypericum perforatum, Potentilla recta, Primula veris, Stachys germanica, Teucrium montanum, and Thymus praecox.
Agriculture 15 02139 g001aAgriculture 15 02139 g001b
Table 1. List of the focal plant species of the current study along with a summary of their documented antioxidant activity.
Table 1. List of the focal plant species of the current study along with a summary of their documented antioxidant activity.
SpeciesFamilyActivity of InterestDescriptionReferences
Achillea crithmifoliaWaldst. and Kit.AsteraceaeEnhancement of CAT, GPx, SOD enzymesHigher activity of CAT, GPx, and SOD enzymes in leukocytes compared to other Achillea species[36,37,38]
Reduction in lipid peroxidation (LPO)High levels of phenolics such as caffeoylquinic acids and sesquiterpene lactones reduce lipid peroxidation, protecting cell membranes[37,38]
Rich phenolic profileContains caffeoylquinic acid derivatives, flavonoids (such as luteolin, apigenin), and sesquiterpene lactones with strong antioxidant activity[37,38]
Achillea millefolium L.AsteraceaeFree radical scavenging, reduces intracellular ROS levelsStrong DPPH/ABTS scavenging, ROS reduction, activation of SOD, CAT, GPx, protection of DNA and membranes[39,40]
Epilobium angustifolium L.OnagraceaeROS scavenging, inhibition of enzymatic systems, high ellagitannin contentOenothein B and flavonoids scavenge ROS, inhibit xanthine oxidase, DPPH/ABTS scavenging, pectin scavenging[41,42,43]
Geranium macrorrhizum L.GeraniaceaeROS scavengingQuercetin glycosides and phenolic acids scavenge free radicals (DPPH, ABTS, superoxide, H2O2)[44]
Geranium sanguineum L.GeraniaceaeROS scavenging, cell membrane protectionStandardized Polyphenolic Complex (PC) scavenges ROS (O2·, H2O2), reduces TBARS, enhances SOD and TAA, and protects cell membranes[45]
Hypericum olympicum L.HypericaceaeAcylphloroglucinol metabolitesStrong DPPH/ABTS/FRAP activity from acylphloroglucinols (olympicins), despite low flavonoid content[46]
Hypericum perforatum L.HypericaceaeROS scavenging, inhibition of lipid peroxidationROS scavenging, lipid peroxidation inhibition, strong DPPH and TAC inhibition (~0.52 μg/mL, lipid peroxidation IC50 ≈ 0.0079 μg/mL)[47,48]
Hypericum maculatum CrantzHypericaceaeROS scavenging, inhibition of lipid peroxidationIsoquercitrin and other flavonoid glycosides scavenge free radicals (DPPH, ABTS, FRAP) and inhibit lipid peroxidation (LPO)[49,50]
Potentilla recta L.RosaceaeROS scavengingFree radical scavenging (DPPH, SO2−, NO) with compounds such as rutin, caffeic acid, ellagic acid[51]
Primula veris L.PrimulaceaeROS scavengingRich in flavonoids and phenolics (quercetin, rutin, isorhamnetin, kaempferol); strong DPPH, ABTS, FRAP activity[52,53,54,55]
Prunella vulgaris L. LamiaceaeROS scavengingExtract P 60 shows strong scavenging activity (DPPH, ABTS, FRAP), increases SOD, reduces MDA, while polysaccharides scavenge ROS[56,57]
Pulsatilla helleri (All.) Willd.RanunculaceaeROS scavengingRich in phenolics, flavonoids and anthocyanidins[58]
Saponaria officinalis L.CaryophyllaceaeROS scavengingPhenolics and flavonoids (protocatechuic acid, rutin, apigenin) scavenge ROS (DPPH, ABTS assays), reduce TBARS[59]
Scutellaria altissima L.LamiaceaeROS scavenging, inhibition of lipid peroxidationROS scavenging, AGEs formation inhibition, strong activity in DPPH, FRAP, and lipid peroxidation (LPO) inhibition[60,61]
Stachys germanica L. LamiaceaeROS scavengingFree radical (ROS) scavenging, very low IC50 in DPPH and FRAP (~688 µM TE/mL). Activity correlates with total phenolic content (TPC) and caffeic acids[62,63]
Teucrium montanum L. LamiaceaeROS scavengingStrong scavenging activity (DPPH, FRAP); protection of proteins and lipids; rich in phenolic acids (p-coumaric, caffeic, ellagic, chlorogenic)[64,65]
Thymus thracicus Velen.LamiaceaeROS scavengingStrong scavenging activity; increase CAT and SOD activity and the antioxidant capacity of the THP-1 cells; rich in phenolics, thymol, and linalool[66,67]
Thymus praecox OpizLamiaceaeROS scavengingStrong scavenging activity; neutralize DPPH radicals; rich in phenolics, thymol, and linalool[67,68]
Table 3. Seed germination (±SD) and viability percentages of the tested species under the applied treatments (GA3 and Kin at 500–2500 ppm, cold stratification-CS and control). Germination conditions in the growth chamber entailed alternating temperature of 25 °C/15 °C D/N, and photoperiod of 12 h light/12 h dark.
Table 3. Seed germination (±SD) and viability percentages of the tested species under the applied treatments (GA3 and Kin at 500–2500 ppm, cold stratification-CS and control). Germination conditions in the growth chamber entailed alternating temperature of 25 °C/15 °C D/N, and photoperiod of 12 h light/12 h dark.
SpeciesGA3500GA31500GA32500Kin500Kin1500Kin2500CSControlViab.
Achillea crithmifolia18.50 ± 1.658 f25.75 ± 2.287 ef38.50 ± 2.398 cd32.00 ± 1.155 ed62.00 ± 0.707 b41.25 ± 1.702 c71.50 ± 1.190 c41.75 ± 1.109 d80
Achillea millefolium15.75 ± 1.887 e28.75 ± 2.562 d41.50 ± 3.797 c35.50 ± 2.533 cd58.00 ± 2.799 b39.00 ± 0.913 bc72.25 ± 1.750 a42.50 ± 1.848 c100
Epilobium angustifolium24.00 ± 2.415 c43.75 ± 2.213 a21.50 ± 2.102 c36.00 ± 0.707 ab5.25 ± 3.966 d2.00 ± 0.408 d18.00 ± 2.828 c25.25 ± 1.652 bc100
Hypericum maculatum67.25 ± 0.946 b40.25 ± 1.109 b3.00 ± 1.080 e21.00 ± 2.041 d21.75 ± 1.652 d14.75 ± 2.955 d52.75 ± 1.031 c84.50 ± 2.598 a100
Hypericum olympicum74.75 ± 0.854 b38.75 ± 0.479 d4.75 ± 0.854 f18.75 ± 0.750 e21.00 ± 0.707 e13.00 ± 4.564 ef51.00 ± 1.683 c90.00 ± 1.225 a100
Hypericum perforatum70.00 ± 1.780 b42.50 ± 1.708 d1.00 ± 0.408 f18.75 ± 1.974 e23.75 ± 1.652 e17.75 ± 2.869 e51.50 ± 0.866 c78.50 ± 1.848 a80
Potentilla recta13.25 ± 1.702 bc18.75 ± 1.887 bc10.50 ± 1.658 c22.00 ± 3.162 b18.50 ± 1.708 bc14.50 ± 1.555 bc20.50 ± 2.062 b81.50 ± 1.708 a100
Primula veris85.50 ± 1.708 a53.00 ± 1.683 bc47.00 ± 1.581 bc43.50 ± 1.041 c42.00 ± 0.707 b19.25 ± 1.315 d19.00 ± 2.646 d47.00 ± 1.581 bc90
Prunella vulgaris49.50 ± 0.645 b29.75 ± 1.250 c32.00 ± 1.414 c7.00 ± 1.225 e4.50 ± 2.630 e9.00 ± 0.707 e17.00 ± 1.780 d79.25 ± 2.428 a90
Pulsatilla halleri53.50 ± 1.323 b35.50 ± 1.041 c34.25 ± 1.109 c68.50 ± 2.327 a1.50 ± 0.866 e8.50 ± 1.500 d4.25 ± 1.652 de49.25 ± 1.601 b80
Saponaria officinalis0.001.75 ± 0.479 c1.50 ± 0.289 c32.00 ± 3.317 a12.00 ± 3.367 b12.25 ± 0.250 b2.25 ± 1.601 c0.0080
Scutellaria altissima34.50 ± 1.258 b0.000.0022.50 ± 0.289 c11.50 ± 2.533 d0.0031.25 ± 1.109 b64.75 ± 1.702 a70
Stachys germanica0.0062.25 ± 1.797 a56.25 ± 1.652 ab11.75 ± 1.652 c46.75 ± 3.425 b49.50 ± 1.190 b15.00 ± 3.342 c63.75 ± 1.601 a70
Teucrium montanum35.25 ± 2.562 b62.75 ± 1.652 a60.25 ± 3.092 a17.00 ± 2.121 c20.25 ± 1.702 c34.75 ± 1.377 b18.00 ± 3.240 c2.50 ± 0.289 d100
Thymus thracicus16.50 ± 1.555 cd14.50 ± 1.708 d13.50 ± 2.062 d29.75 ± 1.377 b22.75 ± 1.493 bc29.25 ± 1.250 b10.00 ± 1.958 d79.25 ± 1.250 a100
Thymus praecox15.75 ± 0.479 e16.25 ± 0.854 de11.50 ± 1.756 e36.25 ± 1.031 b21.75 ± 1.109 d30.50 ± 0.957 c11.25 ± 1.652 e81.75 ± 1.250 a100
Values within each row followed by the same letter are not significantly different (p < 0.05). Cells in bold indicate the cases where the highest germination percentages observed for each focal species.
Table 4. Summarization of seed dormancy types observed in the current study and recommended pre-treatments based on the germination results for each of the focal species.
Table 4. Summarization of seed dormancy types observed in the current study and recommended pre-treatments based on the germination results for each of the focal species.
SpeciesDormancy TypePretreatment
Achillea crithmifoliaPhysiologicalStratification
Achillea millefoliumPhysiologicalStratification
Epilobium angustifoliumPhysiologicalGA3_1500
Hypericum maculatumPhysiologicalAfter-ripening
Hypericum olympicumPhysiologicalAfter-ripening
Hypericum perforatumPhysiologicalAfter-ripening
Potentilla rectaPhysiologicalAfter-ripening
Primula verisPhysiologicalGA3_500
Prunella vulgarisPhysiologicalAfter-ripening
Pulsatilla halleriPhysiologicalGA3_500
Saponaria officinalisPhysiologicalKin_500
Scutellaria altissimaPhysiologicalAfter-ripening
Stachys germanicaPhysiologicalAfter-ripening
Teucrium montanumPhysiologicalGA3_1500
Thymus thracicusPhysiologicalAfter-ripening
Thymus praecoxPhysiologicalAfter-ripening
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Varsamis, G.; Merou, T.; Alexandropoulou, I.; Menti, C.; Karapatzak, E. Seed Germination Ecology and Dormancy Release in Some Native and Underutilized Plant Species with Agronomic Potential. Agriculture 2025, 15, 2139. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15202139

AMA Style

Varsamis G, Merou T, Alexandropoulou I, Menti C, Karapatzak E. Seed Germination Ecology and Dormancy Release in Some Native and Underutilized Plant Species with Agronomic Potential. Agriculture. 2025; 15(20):2139. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15202139

Chicago/Turabian Style

Varsamis, Georgios, Theodora Merou, Ioanna Alexandropoulou, Chrysoula Menti, and Eleftherios Karapatzak. 2025. "Seed Germination Ecology and Dormancy Release in Some Native and Underutilized Plant Species with Agronomic Potential" Agriculture 15, no. 20: 2139. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15202139

APA Style

Varsamis, G., Merou, T., Alexandropoulou, I., Menti, C., & Karapatzak, E. (2025). Seed Germination Ecology and Dormancy Release in Some Native and Underutilized Plant Species with Agronomic Potential. Agriculture, 15(20), 2139. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15202139

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop