Next Article in Journal
Analyzing the Driving Mechanism of Drought Using the Ecological Aridity Index Considering the Evapotranspiration Deficit—A Case Study in Xinjiang, China
Previous Article in Journal
YOLO-MSPM: A Precise and Lightweight Cotton Verticillium Wilt Detection Network
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Significance of Temperature-Rearing Conditions for Shaping the Responses of the Aphid Parasitoid, Aphidius platensis, Under Thermal Stress

by
Francisca Zepeda-Paulo
1,2,*,
Blas Lavandero
2,
Cinthya Villegas
2 and
Mariana Véliz
2
1
Vicerrectoría Académica, Universidad de Talca, 2 Norte 685, Talca 3460000, Chile
2
Laboratorio de Control Biológico, Instituto de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad de Talca, 2 Norte 685, Talca 3460000, Chile
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agriculture 2025, 15(19), 2014; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15192014
Submission received: 2 August 2025 / Revised: 19 September 2025 / Accepted: 24 September 2025 / Published: 26 September 2025

Abstract

A key aspect of climate change’s impact on organisms lies in understanding their ability to adapt to shifting and stressful environmental conditions. Insects, such as parasitoid wasps, are particularly vulnerable due to limited heat tolerance. Adaptive strategies during mass rearing may enhance the efficacy and resilience of commercially reared biocontrol agents. This study assessed the effects of constant and fluctuating temperature regimens across four generations of mass-reared aphid parasitoids, examining their fitness traits and parasitism success under three thermal environments: colder [10 °C], standard [20 °C], and heat stress [28 °C]. Parasitoids reared under fluctuating temperatures [day/night: 25 °C/17 °C] showed increased parasitism, but reduced progeny survival compared to those reared at a constant temperature [20 °C]. Fluctuating regimens encouraged greater parasitism under heat stress, whereas constant regimens yielded intermediate parasitism across thermal environments, reflecting a pattern consistent with the evolution of specialist–generalist trade-offs. These findings underscore the value of developing adaptive temperature-rearing strategies for mass-rearing systems of parasitoids that more accurately simulate field conditions, improving their performance under climate stress. Future research involving diverse temperature regimens should deepen our understanding of trait trade-offs, such as survival and fecundity, and aid in identifying optimal thermal profiles to maximize efficacy in mass-rearing parasitoid wasps and their performance at the field level.

1. Introduction

The impacts of climate change are anticipated to profoundly disturb the interactions between natural enemies and insect pests, thereby affecting the efficacy of biocontrol programs, which in turn exacerbates the challenges that climate change poses to agricultural systems [1,2,3]. Biological control (natural and facilitated) is a crucial ecosystem service that entails reducing pest populations through natural control agents, such as parasitoids, predators, and pathogens, within either unmanaged or managed ecosystems [4]. Their environmental advantages have significantly accelerated the market demand for biocontrol agents in pest control programs in sustainable agricultural systems [5]. Although the magnitude of the consequences of climate warming on biological control mediated by natural enemies is still less understood, these can involve a reduction in the effectiveness of biological control agents in the agroecosystem [6]. Furthermore, predicted climate change could exclude natural enemies from geographic areas where they currently persist [1]. Insects are particularly susceptible to climate change because most physiological processes are temperature-dependent [7]. Environmental stresses such as increased temperature and increased climatic variability impact insect populations, affecting survival, development, reproduction, behavior, and phenology, and changing the abundance, distribution patterns, and seasonal timing of trophic interactions [8]. Parasitoid wasps (hymenopteran parasitoids) are important beneficial insects that play a critical ecological role in regulating other insect pests. They are highly specialized and synchronized with their herbivorous insect hosts, in which parasitoid eggs and larvae are developed [9]. Both parasitoids and their insect hosts are strongly affected by environmental temperatures, but they respond differently to changes in temperature [1]. Several studies have shown differences in the thermal sensitivity between insect hosts and parasitoids, which could be common in nature, with parasitoid species severely threatened under increasing global temperatures as they often present a lower heat tolerance than their insect hosts [10,11,12,13]. For instance, the parasitoid Diadegma semiclausum could be negatively affected by increasing global temperatures due to the proximity of the optimal temperature to the critical thermal maximum in parasitoids, as well as their limited plasticity in response to high temperatures compared to their host Plutella xylostella, a global pest of Brassica crops [1]. Projections for climate change scenarios predict an overall increase in mean temperature and daily and seasonal variations in temperature, including rapid thermal changes such as increased incidence of high and extreme temperatures (e.g., heat waves) [14]. In this context, one major matter surrounding climate impacts on organisms is understanding how they respond to environmental stress and their ability to adapt to new, changing environmental conditions [15]. In the short term, rapid adaptation in insects to changing climates is mainly mediated by plastic responses to thermal conditions such as seasonal strategies to overwinter (e.g., diapause) and thermal acclimation, which allow them to increase resistance to varying environmental conditions [2,16]. Plasticity is a major mechanism of phenotypic change and could be a critical strategy that allows individuals to cope with stresses arising under rapid environmental change, including acclimatization to environmental conditions within a generation (e.g., developmental acclimation and hardening) or across two or three generations (e.g., transgenerational and maternal effects) [16]. There is evidence of how prior exposure to thermal conditions during development can enhance thermotolerance in both host insects and parasitoid species within a single generation [17]. However, the responses observed are species-specific and can be strongly influenced by the thermal regimens experienced. For instance, studies on developmental acclimation in parasitoids of aphids have shown low support for beneficial acclimation [within a generation] to heat stress [18]. On the scale of multiple generations, intraspecific variation for thermal performance-related traits may evolve in response to the thermal environment by natural selection. Climate change is causing increases in both the mean and the variance of environmental temperature, each of which may act as a selective force on different traits of organisms [19]. For instance, the egg parasitoid Telenomus podisi used for controlling the brown stink bug (Euschistus heros) exposed to a fluctuating temperature regimen for four generations can positively influence fitness-related traits and costs of production compared with a constant temperature regimen [20]. Furthermore, it is necessary to determine whether the effect of rearing thermal conditions (mean/variance) shows patterns consistent with thermal adaptation. The thermal environment may act as an agent of selection for traits in populations that develop under contrasting thermal conditions. By examining the mean fitness of different populations or demes across a range of experimental habitats, it is possible to study the role of specific environmental factors as divergent selection agents. This approach enables a comparative analysis of fitness advantages in each population relative to its local environmental context, thereby elucidating the interaction patterns between demes and habitats in terms of fitness outcomes [21]. Understanding the potential of natural enemies to respond and adapt to changing environmental conditions is crucial to implementing climate adaptation measures in biological control programs. Despite the growing economic and environmental importance of managed biological control, there is still a knowledge gap in the relative importance of evolutionary responses to environmental factors on the performance of commercially reared agents. Augmentative biological control involves mass-producing natural enemies prior to their release to suppress pests in specific crops, where these lab-reared populations can be maintained over multiple generations under standard conditions, which provides an opportunity to develop and optimize biological control agents in controlled rearing environments, considering different thermal conditions that they may encounter after release. Endoparasitoid braconid wasps from the subfamily Aphidiinae (Hymenoptera/Braconidae) are an important group of natural enemies of sap-sucking aphid species (Hemiptera/Aphididae) [22]. They are used for commercial augmentative biocontrol in greenhouses and open crops to control agricultural aphid pests, which constitute important virus-transmitting pests on economically important crops [23]. These solitary parasitoid species present a high host specificity, a relatively short generation time, and are easily bred in the laboratory. Parasitoids of aphids lay an egg(s) (commonly a single egg) inside the body of aphid hosts and then develop through a larval stage to become a pupa where the body of the aphid is completely consumed, forming what is called a “mummy” (pupal stage of the parasitoid within the cuticle of its dead aphid host), from which only one parasitoid could emerge, adults can survive up to 20 days after emerging [24]. Here, we studied the generalist parasitoid Aphidius platensis Brethes [Hymenoptera/Braconidae/Aphidiinae], which can be found attacking important aphid pest species such as the peach potato, Myzus persicae, the cabbage aphid, Brevicoryne brassicae, Macrosiphum euphorbiae, and Aulacorthum solani on diverse vegetables (cruciferous, lettuce, tomato, onion, marrow), cereal, and horticultural crops [25,26,27]. The bird cherry-oat aphid, Rhopalosiphum padi Linnaeus, is an important winter host for A. platensis [28]. In addition, a recent study showed an absence of a diapause strategy in A. platensis populations studied from different aphid species and different climatic areas, indicating that individuals are active during the winter season [29,30]. This study first assessed the effect of temperature-rearing regimens (constant and fluctuating temperature regimens) on fitness-related traits during the fourth generation of mass-rearing in the aphid parasitoid A. platensis. We hypothesized that thermal environments during mass-rearing can influence the thermal adaptation of natural enemies; parasitoids reared under fluctuating environments can perform better under a range of thermal conditions than those reared under constant conditions. Then, it studied the effect of temperature regimens on the response of female parasitoids controlling aphid hosts across different temperature environments (colder-standard-heat stress conditions) to assess the role of environmental temperature underpinning the adaptation and optimization of mass-reared control agents for the improvement of augmentative biological control, especially in the context of climate change for which an increase in the mean and variance of temperature is expected [31].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Rearing Under Fluctuating and Constant Temperature Regimens

A single founder parasitoid population of the parasitoid A. platensis was established in the laboratory on its natal host, the aphid R. padi, in oat plants (aphid–plant systems) by collecting natural parasitoid populations from the field. To achieve high genetic and phenotypic variability (in traits under study), the founder parasitoid population was sampled in fields from two administrative regions, among which agricultural production in Chile is mainly concentrated, in two regions of the central and southern Chile, Los Ríos and del Maule regions (South latitude 39° S and 35° S, respectively) (Mediterranean agroecosystem), during crop growing season (November–December, 2023). Aphid parasitoids were sampled by collecting live aphids R. padi from oat fields and rearing under controlled laboratory conditions on oat (20 °C, 60–75% RH, and photoperiod of 16:8 LD (Light/Dark, hours) until the appearance of mummies (i.e., aphid exoskeletons containing the parasitoid pupae). The mummies were transferred to an emerging cage, where later the parasitoids (females and males) emerged and were maintained in this common environment that allowed random mating. After 48 h, the procedure consisted of allowing single females to oviposit individually in closed plant–aphid systems (5 aphids). Following the development and emergence of parasitoid progeny in these systems, an ethanol sample of one female per system was taken for identification. Each female parasitoid individual was determined using taxonomic keys [25,26]. Then, only systems identified as A. platensis parasitoids were used to form the initial population. The founder population comprises a high number of founder parasitoids (>100 females previously allowed to mate), and it was kept under controlled conditions (20 °C, 60–75% RH, 16:8 LD) by three generations for the remotion of maternal environmental effects before the establishment of alternative rearing regimens [16]. Then, parasitoids were reared (mass-reared parasitoids) in two different temperature regimens carried out, as follows: (I) constant temperature regimen at 20 °C (60–75% RH, 16:8 LD) (routinely used for mass-rearing biological control agents) and (II) fluctuating temperature regimen at day 25 °C and at night 17 °C (60–75% RH, 16:8 LD) (approaching shifting conditions for field releases). A constant temperature regimen was chosen based on the standard environmental conditions, including the temperature of 20 °C usually used to breed parasitoids on aphid cultures [32,33,34]. Fluctuating temperature conditions were chosen based on expected climatic indices for increasing mean daily maximum and minimum temperatures for the growing season in the Mediterranean Chilean zone. To approach the shifting conditions experienced by individuals for field releases. Further still, heat temperature does not represent a heat stress indicator (above 25 °C) [35]. In each temperature regimen (constant or fluctuating), 6 experimental population cages were constituted for mass-reared parasitoid populations. Each one was formed with ten parasitoid females that were 48 h old, mated, and randomly searched from a common emergence cage, containing female and male parasitoids that emerged from mummies from the previous generation and fed with water plus honey (2:1) [36]. Females were then reared on a standardized number of aphid hosts (100 aphids). A total of 100 adult aphids were added to the system 24 h prior to the introduction of parasitoid females. Therefore, both the adult and nymphal stages of aphids can coexist in aphid–plant systems for parasitoid rearing. Both aphids and parasitoids were always kept in the same temperature regimen. Rearing environmental conditions for each regimen were carried out in a BIOBASE incubator, model BJPX-L200BK (Jinan City, SD, China) (temperature volatility of ±0.5 °C and temperature deviation of ±1 °C). The system temperature was periodically controlled using an additional thermometer, with no variations being checked during the study period. After four generations of rearing, 30 female parasitoids with 48 h old mated were randomly chosen from temperature regimens (emergence cage) for experimental assays. Each assay consisted of female single added-to-cage populations for choice and oviposition on 100 adult aphids for 24 h in their respective temperature regimen (constant/fluctuating temperature). After 24 h, females were removed alive from all experimental assays, which were kept in their temperature regimen until measurement of traits. The effect of temperature-rearing regimens on traits ecologically relevant for the performance of biological control agents in pest suppressing and mass rearing was experimentally studied by measuring the parasitism, estimated as the mean number of mummified aphids (mummies produced from standardized stung nymphs) [37]; survival of progeny as the number of parasitoids emerged from the number of mummies formed; developmental time estimated as the time from oviposition to the emergence of an adult parasitoid; and offspring sex ratio studied as the proportion of males in the progeny of a single female parasitoid. In hymenopteran parasitoids, females have control of the sex ratio by deciding the sex allocation through the fertilization of eggs or not [37,38]. The body size of progeny was measured as the hind-tibia length (mm) of female and male parasitoids, which is a standard measure to estimate the size of parasitoids [32], taking pictures of the tibia using a digital camera Optikam PRO 5 (Optika, Italy) mounted on a stereo microscope Optika SZN-T (×45), and measurements were taken using Optika Vision Pro v2.7 software (Ponteranica, BG, Italy). Finally, the developmental growth rate of parasitoid progeny (females and males) in the different temperature regimens was estimated as the ratio between body size and total development time [39].

2.2. Effect of Rearing Temperature Regimen on the Response of Parasitoids Under Contrasting Thermal Conditions: A Reciprocal Transplant Experiment

To study the effect of mass-rearing conditions on the climatic pre-adaptability of natural enemies exposed to a thermal range, a reciprocal transplant experiment was carried out. The thermal adaptation pattern of parasitoids was evaluated by studying the performance of pest suppression in female parasitoids reared under different temperature regimens (constant and fluctuating regimens) when exposed to different temperatures during four generations of breeding. The temperature conditions included (1) cold condition at 10 °C (60–75% RH, 16:8 LD), (2) standard condition at 20 °C (60–75% RH, 16:8 LD), and (3) stress heat condition at 28 °C (60–75% RH, 16:8 LD). Contrasting conditions are based on an analysis of agro-climatic indices for the Chilean central valley. The cold condition represents the annual mean minimum temperature from different zones under study (Maule and Los Rios regions) [40]. Under these conditions, Aphidius parasitoids from temperate climates could be induced into winter diapause, maintaining this state until spring [21]. The standard condition represents the mean maximum temperature among geographical zones and is routinely used for mass-rearing of biological control agents [41]. The stress heat condition represents an agro-climatic index for summer, with heat stress temperatures above 25 °C [35]. For experimental assays, female parasitoids were obtained from rearing cage populations; a plastic box (10 × 20 × 15 cm) with females and males for mating, supplied with water and diluted honey (50%) for feeding, from the respective temperature regimen. A total of 21 female parasitoids, 48 h old, mated were randomly chosen from each different temperature regimen (constant and fluctuating temperature) and transferred to respective thermal conditions (cold, standard, or stress heat condition) with water and food for 24 h before assays. This period corresponds to a short exposure for acclimation to the temperatures tested, with a duration of 24 h (hardening) [16]. Post-acclimation females were individually placed in the cage population (oat–aphid system) for choice and oviposition on 50 adult aphids for 24 h at each temperature condition. Once 24 h had passed, each female was removed alive from the experimental assay, then each assay was transferred to a common thermal environment of 20 °C until the measurement of the total number of mummies produced by the parasitoid female in 24 h under a thermal condition. In this way, it is possible to focus the study on the parasitoid responses related to foraging behavior of females involving host choice and selection to oviposition by females, all ecologically relevant traits for the ability of parasitoids to suppress a pest population [9]. This experimental design has been used in similar studies on the effect of environmental temperature on parasitoid behavior [18].

2.3. Data Analysis

The effect of the rearing temperature regimen (constant or fluctuating) (fixed factor) was studied on the different variables measured in this study. The mean number of mummified aphids by female parasitoid was studied using a generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) with a negative binomial distribution implemented in the package glmmTMB in the R program v.4.5.1 [42,43]. Smooth density curves of the number of mummified aphids were visualized using the Kernel Density Estimation (KDE) method implemented in Jamovi 2.6. in R program [44]. Progeny survival was analyzed as the proportion of emerged and non-emerged (binary variable) in the parasitoid progeny using binary logistic regression with temperature regimen as predictor variable using Jamovi 2.6. in R program [44]. Sex ratio of parasitoid progeny was analyzed using a GLMM with a binomial (logit) distribution for proportion data. The variables development time (days) and hind-tibia length (body size) were analyzed using GLMMs with a Gaussian distribution, including both temperature-rearing and parasitoid sex as fixed factors in R program [45]. The body size variable was also transformed using Box–Cox transformation to correct variances with the ‘boxcox’ function from the MASS package in R program [46,47]. The growth rate was analyzed using the GLS model (Generalized Least Squares) for fitting within-group heteroscedasticity implemented in the nlme package in R program [48]. The model included as fixed factors both temperature-rearing regimen and parasitoid sex. The linear relation between hind-tibia length and development time was determined through linear regression using Jamovi 2.6 in R program [44]. The analysis of experimental assays to determine the effect of parasitoid populations’ rearing regimens on the response of parasitoid females in pest suppression (mean number of mummies produced by parasitoid females) exposed to different thermal conditions, including the variables, rearing temperature regimen (constant or fluctuating) and thermal condition (stress, standard and cold condition), and its interaction in the GLMMs using negative binomial distribution in R program. Post hoc comparisons were performed in the R package emmeans [49]. The significance of fixed effects was provided by using the ‘Anova’ function of the car package [50]. Heteroscedasticity, normality, overdispersion, or zero-inflated data were checked in the models using the R package performance [51]. In addition, to correctly classify the distribution family from the models for our data, we used the function check distribution implemented in the R package performance [51].

3. Results

3.1. Effect of Temperature-Rearing Regimens on Parasitoid Traits

After four generations of parasitoid rearing, the effects of the temperature-rearing regimen on several fitness-related traits were studied in the parasitoid populations. The results showed significant differences in the mean parasitism of female parasitoids from different temperature-rearing (χ2 = 9.60; df = 1; p = 0.001), with a higher mean number of mummified aphids by females produced under fluctuating (26.3 ± 3.9 SE) than in a constant temperature regimen (16.7 ± 5.1 SE) (Figure 1A,B). A significant effect of temperature-rearing regimen (χ2 = 13.3; df = 1; p < 0.001) was found on the mean proportion of emerged parasitoids in the different regimens From mummies formed (N = 315), a higher mean proportion of emerging parasitoids in a constant (0.86 ± 0.02 SE) compared to fluctuating temperature-rearing regimen (0.66 ± 0.08 SE) was evidenced (Figure 1C). The mean sex ratio of parasitoid progeny did not show significant differences (χ2 = 0.031; df = 1; p = 0.858) when rearing under a fluctuating (mean 0.32 ± 0.08 SE) and a constant regimen (mean 0.31 ± 0.07 SE), and this was female-biased (sex ratio < 0.5) in both regimens. The mean development time of progeny in mass-rearing parasitoid populations showed significant differences between temperature-rearing regimens (χ2 = 129.62; df = 1; p < 2.2 × 10−16), with a higher mean development time of progeny in the constant regimen (14.5 ± 0.1 SE) than in the fluctuant regimen (13.4 ± 0.08 SE) (Figure 2A). Similarly, the mean hind-tibia length of parasitoids was significantly different from the two temperature-rearing regimens (χ2 = 8.14; df = 1; p = 0.004), with a smaller increase in the size of parasitoids in the constant (mean 0.588 ± 0.004 SE) than in the fluctuating regimen (mean 0.569 ± 0.004 SE) (Figure 2B). Also, the mean hind-tibia length was significantly influenced by parasitoid sex (χ2 = 5.76; df = 1; p = 0.016), observing larger sizes in females (mean 0.583 ± 0.003 SE) than males (mean 0.566 ± 0.006 SE) in both temperature-rearing regimens, as non-interaction between temperature regimen and sex was evidenced for body size (χ2 = 0.06; df = 1; p = 0.800) (Figure 2B). The results did not show a relation between development time and hind-tibia length of parasitoids (N = 228) ( r 2   = 0.009; p = 0.151) (Figure A1). Significant differences in the mean growth rate of parasitoid progeny was found between temperature-rearing regimen (χ2 = 13.93; df = 1; p = 0.0001), which was higher in fluctuating (0.04 ± 0.0004 SE) than in the constant regimen (0.03 ± 0.0003 SE), while non-significant effects in the growth rate were observed between females and males (parasitoid sex: χ2 = 1.66; df = 1; p = 0.197) nor the interaction between temperature regimens and parasitoid sex (χ2 = 0.86; df = 1; p = 0.351) (Figure 2C).

3.2. Effect of Temperature Rearing Regimen on the Response of Parasitoids Under Contrasting Thermal Conditions

A significant interaction of temperature rearing regimen (fluctuating/constant regimens) in different tested thermal conditions (cold/standard/heat stress conditions) on the response of parasitism of parasitoid females was found at the four generations of rearing (temperature regimen x thermal condition interaction: χ2 = 12.86; df = 2; p = 0.0016), also showing differences in their mean response to the thermal conditions studied (χ2 = 9.21; df = 2; p = 0.009), while rearing regimen factor by itself it was not significant (χ2 = 0.004; df = 1; p = 0.947). The parasitism of parasitoid females reared under fluctuating temperature regimen was higher in the heat stress temperature and standard condition in comparison to the parasitism in cold conditions, whereas females in the constant temperature regimen showed a similar intermediate parasitism level across different thermal conditions (Figure 3). The mean emergence rate of progeny for parasitoids did not show differences among different temperature regimens (χ2 = 1.21; df = 1; p = 0.270), thermal conditions (χ2 = 1.11; df = 2; p = 0.573), nor their interaction (temperature regimen x thermal condition) (χ2 = 1.66; df = 2; p = 0.434). The mean emergence rate, including all experimental assays, was 0.92 ± 0.007 (SE), and they were kept in a common standard temperature of 20 °C.

4. Discussion

Environmental conditions, such as temperature, substantially impact the mass-rearing production of biocontrol agents [52,53]. Furthermore, these conditions can be optimized to match the selection pressures in the culture to those experienced in the field, including the changing climate [54]. After four generations of breeding parasitoid populations, the results showed an increased number of parasitized hosts when parasitoid wasps were reared under fluctuating temperatures in comparison with the constant temperature regimen (Figure 1A,B). Fecundity is a central fitness component and can thus be used as a proxy to assess the fitness consequences at different temperatures in parasitoids [55]. However, under fluctuating rearing conditions, parasitoids exhibited compromised survival (emergence rates). Specifically, a lower mean emergence rate (65%) was observed under the fluctuating rearing regimen compared to constant temperature-rearing conditions (85%). This suggests that the fluctuating regimen, particularly the high daily temperature of 25 °C experienced during development, imposes strong selective pressure on parasitoid survival, a phenomenon also observed in other aphid parasitoid species [56]. Temperature can drive directional selection on trait variation within populations, leading to shifts in optimal trait values (e.g., thermal performance) over generations [57]. It can also impose evolutionary constraints, such as trade-offs in traits associated with fitness. For instance, positive environmental effects on certain traits may incur costs for others (allocation trade-offs), such as larger body size resulting in longer development times [58]. Our results indicated that parasitoids (both females and males) reared under constant temperatures exhibited larger body sizes, longer development times, and lower growth rates compared to those reared under fluctuating temperatures. This aligns with the temperature–size rule, where individuals developing at lower temperatures achieve larger body sizes through a reduced growth rate, albeit at the cost of extended development times—a pattern widely documented in aphid parasitoids [59]. Larger females tend to exhibit greater longevity and higher egg loads, potentially enhancing their fecundity [39]. Conversely, shorter development times may facilitate more generations per year (voltinism), enabling rapid population growth and higher densities [39]. Such outcomes could improve the cost-effectiveness of mass-rearing programs and release strategies. Elevated temperature rearing can affect, to a greater degree, parasitoid development, decreasing larval survival, longevity, egg load, and body size, and then affect their fecundity potential. This has been observed in related Aphidius parasitoids (Aphidius colemani Viereck and Aphidius rhopalosiphi De Stefani Perez) exposed to high temperatures [56]. Those previous studies have shown a limited capacity for plastic responses of aphid parasitoids through acclimatization (within a generation) to adapt to heat stress, as high temperatures adversely impact multiple traits. For example, a study on A. colemani revealed limited support for the developmental acclimation hypothesis regarding heat tolerance in adults at 28 °C, highlighting constraints on phenotypic plasticity [18].
In contrast, our results from the transplant experiment revealed increased parasitism of A. platensis reared in a fluctuating regimen at a detrimental temperature for aphid parasitoids, like 28 °C, after four generations of rearing. While females reared under a constant temperature regimen showed an intermediate parasitism across the temperature range tested, including the cold condition at 10 °C. This was detrimental to the parasitoid performance reared under the fluctuating temperature regimen, showing a narrower performance breadth under a fluctuating than a constant regimen, consistent with a generalist phenotype pattern (similar degree of performance across all habitats).
Our results align with the conceptual model of thermal evolution, wherein rising mean temperatures favor genotypes with higher thermal optima but narrower performance breadths—a specialist–generalist trade-off [19]. The conceptual model of evolution in response to changes in environmental temperature suggests that with increases in mean environmental temperature, selection should favor genotypes that confer higher thermal optimum (maximal performance) for ecologically important activities at warmer temperatures, but as maximal performance increases, performance breadth (temperature range) should then decline as an indirect result of a specialist–generalist tradeoff [19]. For instance, adaptation to higher mean temperatures may lead to maladaptation to variability, as evidenced by reduced parasitism at 10 °C by parasitoids from fluctuating regimens. In contrast, intermediate temperatures (e.g., constant 20 °C) may foster generalist phenotypes with broader performance breadths. This was reflected in females reared at 20 °C, which displayed intermediate performance across thermal conditions, including cold stress, suggesting greater phenotypic plasticity. The standard condition of rearing at a temperature of 20 °C (constant) used in this study could maintain a higher variation in the plasticity phenotypic within A. platensis populations, including a higher cold tolerance. A temperature of 20 °C is considered the optimal condition for rearing within the thermal range of aphid parasitoids and their hosts, which potentially enhances the success of intermediate generalist phenotypes. For several aphid parasitoid species (A. rhopalosiphi, Aphidius matricariae, and A. colemani), an optimal temperature has been reported near 20 °C [34,56,57,58].
Natural populations of A. platensis exhibit high cold tolerance, remaining active during winter without diapause [29]. Such plasticity may enhance population persistence under climate variability. However, climate change is increasing exposure to extreme events, particularly heatwaves. Thus, thermotolerance acquired through multigenerational exposure to warm regimens could optimize the field performance of biocontrol agents. In addition, strong survival constraints under thermal stress may disproportionately shape the evolution of the thermal performance curve (TPC), which quantifies performance or fitness across critical thermal limits [59].
Trade-offs in resource allocation—e.g., between longevity and reproduction or size and development time—highlight constraints on plasticity and adaptation [17,40,60]. Understanding these trade-offs is critical for biological control efficacy, particularly in field releases. The observed trade-offs between parasitism and offspring survival under thermal environments need to be considered, as these may have complex effects on the mass-rearing systems. Future research should explore the physiological, molecular, and genetic basis of the changes observed in parasitoid traits under temperature-rearing regimens, as well as host-related effects, which would obviously improve understanding of the processes underlying mass rearing of parasitoids under thermal regimes. Such efforts could refine rearing strategies and enhance the resilience of biocontrol agents under warming climate scenarios [61].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.Z.-P. and B.L.; methodology, F.Z.-P., C.V. and M.V.; formal analysis, F.Z.-P.; investigation, F.Z.-P., C.V. and M.V.; writing—original draft preparation, F.Z.-P.; writing—review and editing, B.L.; visualization, F.Z.-P.; supervision, F.Z.-P.; project administration, F.Z.-P.; funding acquisition, F.Z.-P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo, grant number 11230372, and the APC was funded by FONDECYT no. 11230372.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Biosecurity Committee of Universidad de Talca for studies involving animals.

Data Availability Statement

Data deposited in the Mendeley repository, https://doi.org/10.17632/nk7xmgbzr7.1.

Acknowledgments

The authors have reviewed and edited the output and take full responsibility for the content of this publication.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Appendix A

Figure A1. Relationship between hind-tibia length on the y-axis and development time in the parasitoid progeny on the x-axis. Regresion line and their confidence interval 95% (shaded blue area) are represented in the scatter plot ( r 2 = 0.009; p = 0.151).
Figure A1. Relationship between hind-tibia length on the y-axis and development time in the parasitoid progeny on the x-axis. Regresion line and their confidence interval 95% (shaded blue area) are represented in the scatter plot ( r 2 = 0.009; p = 0.151).
Agriculture 15 02014 g0a1

References

  1. Furlong, M.J.; Zalucki, M.P. Climate change and biological control: The consequences of increasing temperatures on host–parasitoid interactions. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 2017, 20, 39–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Tougeron, K.; Brodeur, J.; Le Lann, C.; van Baaren, J. How climate change affects the seasonal ecology of insect parasitoids. Ecol. Entomol. 2020, 45, 167–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Monticelli, L.S.; Bishop, J.; Desneux, N.; Gurr, G.M.; Jaworski, C.C.; McLean, A.H.; Vanbergen, A.J. Multiple global change impacts on parasitism and biocontrol services in future agricultural landscapes. Adv. Ecol. Res. 2021, 65, 245–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Barratt, B.I.P.; Moran, V.C.; Bigler, F.; Van Lenteren, J.C. The status of biological control and recommendations for improving uptake for the future. BioControl 2018, 63, 155–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Patel, H.R.; Mandaliya, V.B. Biocontrol agents in agriculture: Patent landscape, market dynamics, and recommendations for sustainable farming. In Bio-Control Agents for Sustainable Agriculture; Mitra, D., de los Santos Villalobos, S., Rani, A., Guerra Sierra, B.E., Andjelković, S., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wakil, W.; Kavallieratos, N.G.; Eleftheriadou, N.; Ghazanfar, M.U.; El-Shafie, H.A.; Blankson, A.; Harvey, J.A. Climate change consequences for insect pest management, sustainable agriculture and food security. Entomol. Gen. 2025, 45, 37–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Harvey, J.A.; Tougeron, K.; Gols, R.; Heinen, R.; Abarca, M.; Abram, P.K.; Chown, S.L. Scientists’ warning on climate change and insects. Ecol. Monogr. 2023, 93, e1553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bale, J.S.; Masters, G.J.; Hodkinson, I.D.; Awmack, C.; Bezemer, T.M.; Brown, V.K.; Butterfield, J.; Buse, A.; Coulson, J.C.; Farrar, J.; et al. Herbivory in global climate change research: Direct effects of rising temperature on insect herbivores. Glob. Change Biol. 2002, 8, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Godfray, H.C.J. Parasitoids: Behavioral and Evolutionary Ecology; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  10. Schreven, S.J.J.; Frago, E.; Stens, A.; de Jong, P.W.; van Loon, J.J.A. Contrasting effects of heat pulses on different trophic levels: An experiment with a herbivore–parasitoid model system. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0176704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Machekano, H.; Mvumi, B.M.; Nyamukondiwa, C. Loss of coevolved basal and plastic responses to temperature may underlie trophic level host–parasitoid interactions under global change. Biol. Control 2018, 118, 44–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mutamiswa, R.; Chidawanyika, F.; Nyamukondiwa, C. Comparative assessment of the thermal tolerance of spotted stemborer and its larval parasitoid. Insect Sci. 2018, 25, 847–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Moore, M.E.; Hill, C.A.; Kingsolver, J.G. Differing thermal sensitivities in a host–parasitoid interaction: High, fluctuating developmental temperatures produce dead wasps and giant caterpillars. Funct. Ecol. 2021, 35, 675–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ranasinghe, R.; Ruane, A.C.; Vautard, R.; Arnell, N.; Coppola, E.; Dessai, S.; Cruz, F.A.; Dessai, S.; Islam, A.K.M.S.; Rahimi, M.; et al. Climate change information for regional impact and risk assessment. Clim. Change 2021, 1767, 1926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Pörtner, H.O. Climate impacts on organisms, ecosystems and human societies: Integrating OCLTT into a wider context. J. Exp. Biol. 2021, 224 (Suppl. 1), jeb238360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sgrò, C.M.; Terblanche, J.S.; Hoffmann, A.A. What can plasticity contribute to insect responses to climate change? Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2016, 61, 433–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Le Lann, C.; Van Baaren, J.; Visser, B. Dealing with predictable and unpredictable temperatures in a climate change context: The case of parasitoids and their hosts. J. Exp. Biol. 2021, 224 (Suppl. 1), jeb238626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jerbi-Elayed, M.; Foray, V.; Tougeron, K.; Grissa-Lebdi, K.; Hance, T. Developmental temperature affects life-history traits and heat tolerance in the aphid parasitoid Aphidius colemani. Insects 2021, 12, 852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Logan, M.L.; Cox, C.L. Genetic constraints, transcriptome plasticity, and the evolutionary response to climate change. Front. Genet. 2020, 11, 538226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Castellanos, N.L.; Bueno, A.F.; Haddi, K.; Silveira, E.C.; Rodrigues, H.S.; Hirose, E.; Smagghe, G.; Oliveira, E.E. The fitness and economic benefits of rearing the parasitoid Telenomus podisi under fluctuating temperature regime. Neotrop. Entomol. 2019, 48, 934–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Tougeron, K.; Van Baaren, J.; Llopis, S.; Ridel, A.; Doyon, J.; Brodeur, J.; Le Lann, C. Disentangling plasticity from local adaptation in diapause expression in parasitoid wasps from contrasting thermal environments: A reciprocal translocation experiment. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2018, 124, 756–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rakhshani, E.; Starý, P. Aphid Parasitoids: Aphidiinae (Hym., Braconidae). In Biological Control of Insect and Mite Pests in Iran: A Review from Fundamental and Applied Aspects; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 333–399. [Google Scholar]
  23. Van Lenteren, J.C.; Bolckmans, K.; Köhl, J.; Ravensberg, W.J.; Urbaneja, A. Biological control using invertebrates and microorganisms: Plenty of new opportunities. BioControl 2018, 63, 39–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Le Ralec, A.; Anselme, C.; Outreman, Y.; Poirié, M.; van Baaren, J.; Le Lann, C.; van Alphen, J.J.M. Evolutionary ecology of the interactions between aphids and their parasitoids. Comptes Rendus Biol. 2010, 333, 554–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Starý, P. The Aphidiidae of Chile (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonoidea, Aphidiidae). Dtsch. Entomol. Z. 1995, 42, 113–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tomanović, Z.; Petrović, A.; Mitrović, M.; Kavallieratos, N.G.; Starý, P.; Rakhshani, E.; Popović, A.; Shukshuk, A.; Ivanović, A. Molecular and morphological variability within the Aphidius colemani group with redescription of Aphidius platensis brethes. Bull. Entomol. Res. 2014, 104, 552–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Nieto, J.M.; Fuentes-Contreras, E.; Castro, M.C.; Aldea, M.P.; Ortego, J.; Mier, P.D. Catálogo de los áfidos (Hemiptera: Aphididae) de Chile, con plantas hospedadoras y distribuciones regional y provincial. Graellsia 2016, 72, e050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Alvarez-Baca, J.K.; Alfaro-Tapia, A.; Lavandero, B.; Le Lann, C.; Van Baaren, J. Suitability and profitability of a cereal aphid for the parasitoid Aphidius platensis in the context of conservation biological control of Myzus persicae in orchards. Insects 2020, 11, 381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Alfaro-Tapia, A.; Alvarez-Baca, J.K.; Tougeron, K.; Lavandero, B.; Le Lann, C.; Van Baaren, J. Overwintering strategies and life-history traits of different populations of Aphidius platensis along a latitudinal gradient in Chile. Entomol. Gen. 2021, 42, 127–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Alfaro-Tapia, A.; Alvarez-Baca, J.K.; Tougeron, K.; Van Baaren, J.; Lavandero, B.; Le Lann, C. Composition and structure of winter aphid–parasitoid food webs along a latitudinal gradient in Chile. Oecologia 2022, 200, 425–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lee, H.; Calvin, K.; Dasgupta, D.; Krinner, G.; Mukherji, A.; Thorne, P.; Trisos, C.; Romero, J.; Aldunce, P.; Barrett, K.; et al. IPCC, Sections. Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Core Writing Team, Lee, H., Romero, J., Eds.; IPCC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2023; pp. 35–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Nicol, C.M.Y.; Mackauer, M. The scaling of body size and mass in a host–parasitoid association: Influence of host species and stage. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 1999, 90, 83–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Dion, E.; Zélé, F.; Simon, J.-C.; Outreman, Y. Rapid evolution of parasitoids when faced with the symbiont-mediated resistance of their hosts. J. Evol. Biol. 2011, 24, 741–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Jerbi-Elayed, M.; Tougeron, K.; Grissa-Lebdi, K.; Hance, T. Effect of developmental temperatures on Aphidius colemani host-foraging behavior at high temperature. J. Therm. Biol. 2022, 103, 103140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Piticar, A. Changes in agro-climatic indices related to temperature in Central Chile. Int. J. Biometeorol. 2019, 63, 499–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Charles, J.J.; Paine, T.D. Fitness effects of food resources on the polyphagous aphid parasitoid, Aphidius colemani Viereck. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0147551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Antolin, M.F.; Bjorkstein, T.A.; Vaughn, T.T. Host-related fitness trade-offs in a presumed generalist parasitoid, Diaeretiella rapae (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae). Ecol. Entomol. 2006, 31, 242–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Charnov, E.L.; Los-den Hartogh, R.L.; Jones, W.T.; van den Assem, J. Sex ratio evolution in a variable environment. Nature 1981, 289, 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Colinet, H.; Boivin, G.; Hance, T. Manipulation of parasitoid size using the temperature-size rule: Fitness consequences. Oecologia 2007, 152, 425–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Araya-Osses, D.; Casanueva, A.; Román-Figueroa, C.; Uribe, J.M.; Paneque, M. Climate change projections of temperature and precipitation in Chile based on statistical downscaling. Clim. Dyn. 2020, 54, 4309–4330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Domínguez, J.I.; Vergara, M.M.; Aguirre, R.; Barrera, D.; Montero, J.; Cáceres, L.; Eguillor, P.; Espinoza, A.; García, A.; Reyes, A.; et al. Chilean Agriculture Overview; Office of Agricultural Studies and Policies (ODEPA) of the Chilean Ministry of Agriculture, Santiago, Chile. 2019. Available online: https://www.odepa.gob.cl/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/panorama2019Final.pdf (accessed on 1 June 2025).
  42. Bolker, B.M.; Brooks, M.E.; Clark, C.J.; Geange, S.W.; Poulsen, J.R.; Stevens, M.H.H.; White, J.S.S. Generalized linear mixed models: A practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2009, 24, 127–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Brooks, M.E.; Kristensen, K.; van Benthem, K.J.; Magnusson, A.; Berg, C.W.; Nielsen, A.; Skaug, H.J.; Maechler, M.; Bolker, B.M. glmmTMB Balances Speed and Flexibility Among Packages for Zero-inflated Generalized Linear Mixed Modeling. R J. 2017, 9, 378–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. The Jamovi Project. Jamovi. (Version 2.6). 2024. Available online: https://www.jamovi.org (accessed on 1 June 2025).
  45. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (Version 4.4). R packages retrieved from CRAN snapshot 2024-08-07. 2024. Available online: https://cran.r-project.org (accessed on 1 June 2025).
  46. Box, G.E.P.; Cox, D.R. An analysis of transformations. J. R. Stat. Soc. B. 1964, 26, 211–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Venables, W.N.; Ripley, B.D. Modern Applied Statistics with S, 4th ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  48. Pinheiro, J.; Bates, D.; DebRoy, S.; Sarkar, D.; R Core Team. nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R Package, version 3.1-162. 2021. [Google Scholar]
  49. Lenth, R. Emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, Aka Least-Squares Means. R Package Version 1.10.6090003. 2025. Available online: https://cran.r-project.org/package=emmeans (accessed on 1 June 2025).
  50. Fox, J.; Weisberg, S. An R Companion to Applied Regression, 3rd ed.; Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  51. Lüdecke, D.; Ben-Shachar, M.; Patil, I.; Waggoner, P.; Makowski, D. performance: An R Package for Assessment, Comparison and Testing of Statistical Models. J. Open Source Softw. 2021, 6, 3139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Cohen, A.C. Ecology of insect rearing systems: A mini-review of insect rearing papers from 1906–2017. Adv. Entomol. 2018, 6, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Herren, P.; Hesketh, H.; Meyling, N.V.; Dunn, A.M. Environment–host–parasite interactions in mass-reared insects. Trends Parasitol. 2023, 39, 588–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Lommen, S.T.; de Jong, P.W.; Pannebakker, B.A. It is time to bridge the gap between exploring and exploiting: Prospects for utilizing intraspecific genetic variation to optimize arthropods for augmentative pest control—A review. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2017, 162, 108–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Buckley, L.B.; Schoville, S.D.; Williams, C.M. Shifts in the relative fitness contributions of fecundity and survival in variable and changing environments. J. Exp. Biol. 2021, 224 (Suppl. 1), jeb228031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Le Lann, C.; Wardziak, T.; van Baaren, J.; van Alphen, J.J.M. Thermal plasticity of metabolic rates linked to life-history traits and foraging behaviour in a parasitic wasp. Funct. Ecol. 2011, 25, 641–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Giri, M.K.; Pass, B.C.; Yeargan, K.V.; Parr, J.C. Behavior, net reproduction, longevity, and mummy-stage survival of Aphidius matricariae. Entomophaga 1982, 27, 147–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zamani, A.A.; Talebi, A.; Fathipour, Y.; Baniameri, V. Effect of temperature on life history of Aphidius colemani and Aphidius matricariae, two parasitoids of Aphis gossypii and Myzus persicae. Environ. Entomol. 2007, 36, 263–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Logan, M.L.; Cox, R.M.; Calsbeeka, R. Natural selection on thermal performance in a novel thermal environment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 33, 14165–14169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ismaeil, I.; Doury, G.; Desouhant, E.; Dubois, F.; Prevost, G.; Couty, A. Trans-generational effects of mild heat stress on the life history traits of an aphid parasitoid. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e54306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Deutsch, C.A.; Tewksbury, J.J.; Tigchelaar, M.; Battisti, D.S.; Merrill, S.C.; Huey, R.B.; Naylor, R.L. Increase in crop losses to insect pests in a warming climate. Science 2018, 361, 916–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Influence of two temperature-rearing regimens, constant at 20 °C (circle) and fluctuating temperatures (square)(day: 25 °C; night: 17 °C) on (A) probability density of number of mummified aphids and (B) the mean (±SE) number of mummified aphids (mummies)/female by 24 h and (C) mean (±SE) emergence rate of parasitoid progeny from mummies at generation four of mass-rearing of the aphid parasitoid Aphidius platensis.
Figure 1. Influence of two temperature-rearing regimens, constant at 20 °C (circle) and fluctuating temperatures (square)(day: 25 °C; night: 17 °C) on (A) probability density of number of mummified aphids and (B) the mean (±SE) number of mummified aphids (mummies)/female by 24 h and (C) mean (±SE) emergence rate of parasitoid progeny from mummies at generation four of mass-rearing of the aphid parasitoid Aphidius platensis.
Agriculture 15 02014 g001
Figure 2. Influence of rearing temperature regimens (constant: 20 °C; fluctuating in the day: 25 °C; at night: 17 °C) on (A) the mean (±SE) development time (days); (B) mean (±SE) hind-tibia length (mm) of parasitoid progeny; and (C) mean (±SE) developmental growth rate (mm day−1) at generation four of mass-rearing of the aphid parasitoid Aphidius platensis.
Figure 2. Influence of rearing temperature regimens (constant: 20 °C; fluctuating in the day: 25 °C; at night: 17 °C) on (A) the mean (±SE) development time (days); (B) mean (±SE) hind-tibia length (mm) of parasitoid progeny; and (C) mean (±SE) developmental growth rate (mm day−1) at generation four of mass-rearing of the aphid parasitoid Aphidius platensis.
Agriculture 15 02014 g002
Figure 3. Effect of rearing temperature regimens (constant: 20 °C, and fluctuating in the day: 25 °C; at night: 17 °C) on the mean (±SE) number of mummified aphids/female by 24 h evaluated under contrasting thermal conditions (cold: 10 °C/standard: 20 °C/stress heat: 28 °C) at the fourth generation of mass-rearing of the aphid parasitoid Aphidius platensis. Different letters indicate post-doc comparisons (Tukey’s HSD, p < 0.05).
Figure 3. Effect of rearing temperature regimens (constant: 20 °C, and fluctuating in the day: 25 °C; at night: 17 °C) on the mean (±SE) number of mummified aphids/female by 24 h evaluated under contrasting thermal conditions (cold: 10 °C/standard: 20 °C/stress heat: 28 °C) at the fourth generation of mass-rearing of the aphid parasitoid Aphidius platensis. Different letters indicate post-doc comparisons (Tukey’s HSD, p < 0.05).
Agriculture 15 02014 g003
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zepeda-Paulo, F.; Lavandero, B.; Villegas, C.; Véliz, M. Significance of Temperature-Rearing Conditions for Shaping the Responses of the Aphid Parasitoid, Aphidius platensis, Under Thermal Stress. Agriculture 2025, 15, 2014. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15192014

AMA Style

Zepeda-Paulo F, Lavandero B, Villegas C, Véliz M. Significance of Temperature-Rearing Conditions for Shaping the Responses of the Aphid Parasitoid, Aphidius platensis, Under Thermal Stress. Agriculture. 2025; 15(19):2014. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15192014

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zepeda-Paulo, Francisca, Blas Lavandero, Cinthya Villegas, and Mariana Véliz. 2025. "Significance of Temperature-Rearing Conditions for Shaping the Responses of the Aphid Parasitoid, Aphidius platensis, Under Thermal Stress" Agriculture 15, no. 19: 2014. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15192014

APA Style

Zepeda-Paulo, F., Lavandero, B., Villegas, C., & Véliz, M. (2025). Significance of Temperature-Rearing Conditions for Shaping the Responses of the Aphid Parasitoid, Aphidius platensis, Under Thermal Stress. Agriculture, 15(19), 2014. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15192014

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop