Next Article in Journal
Technological Properties of Ancient Wheat Species and Common Wheat Grown Organically Under Mouldboard Ploughing and Shallow Tillage
Previous Article in Journal
Precision Feeding on Pig Fattening Farms: Can Simplified Implementation Enhance Productivity and Reduce Pollutant Emissions?
Previous Article in Special Issue
Integrating Proximal Gamma Ray and Cosmic Ray Neutron Sensors to Assess Soil Moisture Dynamics in an Agricultural Field in Spain
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Long-Term Straw Return Strategies Shape Soil Properties and Bacterial Community Structure in a Mollisol: A Nine-Year Field Trial

1
College of Engineering and Technology, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China
2
College of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130022, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Agriculture 2025, 15(18), 1936; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15181936
Submission received: 10 August 2025 / Revised: 7 September 2025 / Accepted: 12 September 2025 / Published: 12 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Soil Chemical Properties and Soil Conservation in Agriculture)

Abstract

Returning crop residues to soil is fundamental to sustainable agriculture, yet its adoption in cold-climate regions is hampered by an agronomic paradox: surface mulching conserves water but suppresses the spring soil temperatures required for crop establishment. In the present study, through a nine-year field experiment in a Mollisol under continuous maize cultivation, it was demonstrated that the method of maize straw incorporation, not merely its rate, is the decisive factor in resolving this conflict. While surface mulching maximized water conservation, it induced severe soil cooling and showed minimal gains in soil fertility. In contrast, incorporation via rotary tillage or deep plowing mitigated this cooling effect and proved superior for nutrient cycling. Among all strategies, rotary tillage of 50% residue (ROT-50) delivered the most balanced performance: it achieved the highest total nitrogen, substantially increased soil microbial biomass, and maintained one of the highest levels of Shannon diversity among incorporation treatments. These biogeochemical enhancements were driven by a fundamental, method-induced shift in the bacterial community from an oligotrophic to a copiotrophic structure. These findings shift the paradigm from a focus on residue quantity to one on incorporation method, providing a robust framework for reconciling crop productivity with long-term soil health in temperate agroecosystems.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Maintaining the health of agricultural soils is foundational to global food security and ecological stability. Mollisols, colloquially known as “black soils”, represent some of the planet’s most fertile and productive lands, functioning as critical breadbaskets that underpin the global food supply [1,2]. The Mollisol region of Northeast China is a paramount example; remarkably, these limited black soil areas have contributed approximately one-quarter of China’s total grain production since 2013 [3]. In response to signs of soil degradation from decades of intensive cultivation, the return of crop straw—predominantly maize (Zea mays L.) straw in this region—to the soil has been widely advocated as a cornerstone practice for sustainable agriculture. This strategy aims to replenish soil organic matter, enhance nutrient cycling, improve soil structure and water retention, and ultimately reduce the reliance on synthetic fertilizers [4,5]. While crop yield responses to straw return have been extensively documented, the underlying soil mechanisms governing these responses remain poorly understood, particularly the long-term soil-microbe interactions that drive sustainable productivity.
Despite its clear theoretical benefits, the practical implementation of straw return in temperate and cold-climate agroecosystems like Northeast China is constrained by a persistent agronomic paradox. The region’s climate, characterized by cold, dry winters and short, cool springs, dramatically slows the decomposition of straw residues left on the soil surface [6]. This leads to the accumulation of a thick, insulating mat that, while highly effective at conserving soil moisture, simultaneously acts as a potent thermal barrier, significantly suppressing soil warming during the critical spring sowing period [7,8]. The resulting “cold and wet” soil conditions are well-documented to trigger a cascade of negative agronomic consequences, including delayed seed germination, impaired seedling vigor, and increased susceptibility to pathogens, which collectively compromise crop yields and farmer profitability [9,10]. This acute conflict between the long-term ecological goal of soil conservation and the short-term economic imperative of crop establishment presents a powerful disincentive for its widespread adoption, posing a significant barrier to the region’s sustainable development [11].
To navigate this complex trade-off, a considerable body of research has explored various management strategies, focusing on two key variables: the incorporation method and the application rate. These studies have provided valuable foundational insights, confirming, for example, that surface mulching excels at water conservation at the cost of soil warmth, whereas incorporation via tillage can accelerate nutrient release. However, a comprehensive understanding is hindered by two critical limitations. First, the vast majority of studies are conducted over short-term periods (typically 1–3 years), a timescale often insufficient to move beyond transient effects and characterize the stable, long-term ecological realignment of the soil system [12,13]. Second, while foundational studies have documented individual responses of soil physical, chemical, or biological properties, a systems-level integration that mechanistically links these domains remains less developed. [14,15,16]. The full causal chain—from management practice to physical environment, to biogeochemical transformation, and ultimately to microbial community assembly—has not been fully elucidated. Consequently, a fundamental knowledge gap persists: how do the long-term, interactive effects of straw placement and quantity collaboratively shape the soil’s integrated physicochemical environment to determine the final, stable structure of its resident microbial communities? Addressing this interactive, long-term dimension is the key to resolving the region’s central agronomic paradox.
Current research directly addresses this critical knowledge gap by leveraging a comprehensive, nine-year factorial field experiment established in a representative Mollisol. This long-term platform, which systematically evaluates three distinct incorporation methods (surface mulching, rotary tillage, and deep plowing), each applied at three rates (30%, 50%, and 100%), was designed explicitly to disentangle the complex, interactive effects after the system had reached a mature state. Objectives in this research were threefold: (1) to quantify how the long-term interplay of the straw return method and rate reshapes the soil’s physical environment, particularly the temperature-moisture dynamics that define the central agronomic paradox; (2) to determine how these integrated management regimes, acting as sustained ecological filters, drive transformations in soil biogeochemistry (total nitrogen, microbial biomass) and ultimately shape the resultant, stable structure and diversity of the soil bacterial community; and (3) to synthesize these findings to identify an optimal, evidence-based strategy that reconciles the competing demands of crop productivity and long-term soil health.
Based on the premise that the physical placement of residue fundamentally dictates its ecological function, it was hypothesized that after nine years of consistent application, the incorporation method would emerge as a far more dominant driver of change in soil properties and bacterial community assembly than the residue rate. Specifically, it was predicted that a strategy of incorporating a moderate amount of residue (50%) via rotary tillage would prove superior. It is assumed that this approach would strike an optimal balance by effectively enhancing nutrient cycling and microbial health through improved soil-straw contact, while simultaneously mitigating the severe soil cooling penalty associated with high-residue surface mulching. By testing this hypothesis, this work aims to shift the prevailing management paradigm. Activities in this research move beyond the simplistic, quantity-focused question of “how much” residue to return and instead address the more critical and functionally relevant question of “how” and “where it should be placed within the soil ecosystem. This transition from a quantity-centric to a method-driven framework provides a robust scientific pathway for achieving both agricultural productivity and long-term soil sustainability in temperate agroecosystems worldwide.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Site Description and Experimental Design

The long-term field experiment was initiated in autumn 2015 at the Crop Breeding Center of the Harbin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, located in Heilongjiang Province, China (45°51′ N, 126°28′ E). The experimental site is situated in the Songnen Plain, a region representative of the Mollisols of Northeast China. This region is characterized by a temperate continental monsoon climate, with a mean annual temperature of 3.6 °C and mean annual precipitation of 533 mm. The soil is classified as a Mollisol with a clay loam texture (35% clay, 40% silt, and 25% sand). The site follows a continuous maize (Zea mays L.) monoculture system, which is the dominant cropping pattern in the region. To isolate the effects of the straw return strategies, all experimental plots, including the control, received identical mineral fertilization management throughout the nine-year period, based on local agronomic recommendations for maize (200 kg N ha−1, 100 kg P2O5 ha−1, and 90 kg K2O ha−1). The site operates under a rainfed agricultural system; therefore, no supplementary irrigation was applied during the experiment. All straw used in the experiment was derived from the previous season’s maize harvest.
For this study, the no-straw return (NSR) treatment serves as the experimental control, providing the baseline against which all straw return strategies are compared. After nine years of consistent management, the core physicochemical and biological properties of the topsoil (0–20 cm) in these control plots, reflecting a state of degradation due to long-term residue removal, were as follows: pH 6.85, organic matter 23.45 g/kg, total nitrogen (TN) 1.40 g/kg, and soil microbial biomass carbon (SMBC) 180 mg/kg.
The experiment, maintained for nine consecutive years (2016–2024), consisted of ten treatments arranged in a randomized complete block design with three replications. To align with standard agronomic practices while optimizing land use, individual plots were established with a size of 30 m in length by 6.5 m in width, accommodating 10 rows of maize at a 65 cm row spacing. A 2 m buffer zone was maintained between adjacent plots to minimize cross-contamination. To ensure data representativeness and avoid edge effects, all measurements and sampling were conducted within a central core area of each plot, comprising the middle 6 rows over a 25 m length. The experimental treatments included the no-straw return control (NSR) and a 3 × 3 factorial design comprising three straw incorporation methods—Surface Mulching (MUL), Rotary Tillage (ROT), and Deep Plowing (PLW)—each applied at three distinct rates. Detailed descriptions of the ten treatments are provided in Table 1.

2.2. Soil Sampling and Physicochemical Analysis

Soil sampling for physicochemical analysis (ST, SWC, pH, TN, SMBC) was conducted annually in mid-May from 2016 to 2024, consistently capturing the pre-sowing period. For the comprehensive bacterial community analysis reported herein, soil samples from the final year (mid-May 2024) were used. This final sampling point was selected as it represents the mature, stabilized state of the soil ecosystem after nine consecutive years of treatment application, allowing for a definitive assessment of the long-term impacts on microbial community structure. From each plot, five soil cores (0–20 cm depth) were randomly collected using a spiral auger and subsequently pooled to create a single composite sample. After manually removing visible roots and plant debris, each composite sample was passed through a 2 mm sieve. Each sieved sample was then partitioned into two subsamples. One was immediately stored at −80 °C for subsequent molecular analysis, while the other was air-dried for the determination of physicochemical properties.
Soil temperature (ST) was measured using an automatic temperature recorder (TR-71U, T&D Corporation, Matsumoto, Japan) equipped with a digital thermocouple probe. Soil water content (SWC) was determined gravimetrically by oven-drying of fresh soil samples at 105 °C to a constant weight. Soil pH was measured in a 1:2.5 (w/v) soil-to-deionized water suspension using a benchtop pH meter. Soil total nitrogen (TN) was determined using the semi-micro Kjeldahl method following digestion with concentrated H2SO4.
Soil microbial biomass carbon (SMBC) was quantified using the chloroform fumigation-extraction method. Briefly, fumigated and non-fumigated soil samples were extracted with 0.5 M K2SO4, and the carbon content in the extracts was measured with a total organic carbon (TOC) analyzer (Vario TOC cube, Elementar Analysensysteme, Langenselbold, Germany). SMBC was calculated according to the established formula:
SMBC = EC/kEC
where EC represents the difference in extractable organic carbon between fumigated and non-fumigated samples, and kEC is the extraction efficiency coefficient. A standard kEC value of 0.45 was used in this study, consistent with the recommendations of Joergensen et al. [17].

2.3. Soil DNA Extraction and 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing

Total genomic DNA was extracted from 0.5 g of each frozen soil subsample using the DNeasy PowerSoil Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Three biological replicates were processed for each treatment. The concentration and purity of the extracted DNA were assessed via spectrophotometry using a NanoDrop 2000 instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), with DNA concentrations ranging from 15 to 45 ng/μL and A260/A280 ratios between 1.8 and 2.0.
The V4–V5 hypervariable regions of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene were amplified using the universal primer pair 515F (5′-GTGCCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA-3′) and 926R (5′-CCGTCAATTCMTTTGAGTTT-3′), a protocol widely adopted since its description by 157 Zhao et al. [18] Amplicon libraries were prepared for sequencing through a two-step PCR 158 protocol. PCR amplification was performed in 25 μL reactions containing 12.5 μL of 2× Taq PCR Master Mix, 1 μL each of forward and reverse primers (10 μM), 2 μL of template DNA, and 8.5 μL of nuclease-free water. The thermal cycling program consisted of initial denaturation at 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 45 s, with a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. Amplicon libraries were sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq platform (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) using a 2 × 250 bp paired-end strategy, generating approximately 50,000–80,000 raw reads per sample.

2.4. Bioinformatic and Statistical Analysis

Raw paired-end reads were subjected to quality control using Cutadapt (v4.5) for primer and adapter removal. High-quality reads were merged using FLASH2 (v2.2.0) with minimum overlap of 50 bp and maximum mismatch ratio of 0.1. Merged sequences were quality-filtered using Trimmomatic (v0.39) with a sliding window of 4 bp and average quality threshold of 25; sequences shorter than 350 bp were discarded.
Quality-filtered sequences were clustered into Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) at 97% similarity using Usearch (v11.0), with chimeric sequences removed using the UCHIME algorithm. Singleton OTUs were excluded from downstream analysis. Taxonomic classification was assigned to representative sequences against the SILVA (v138.1) database. The OTU table was rarefied to 25,000 reads per sample to normalize sequencing depth. Alpha diversity indices (Chao1, Ace, Shannon, and Simpson) were calculated in Mothur (v1.48.0).
Prior to statistical analysis, data were tested for normality and variance homogeneity using Shapiro–Wilk and Levene’s tests, respectively. For the nine straw return treatments, a two-way ANOVA was conducted using the General Linear Model (GLM) procedure in IBM SPSS Statistics (v29.0) to test the main effects of incorporation method (MUL, ROT, PLW), return rate (30%, 50%, 100%), and their interaction. The no-straw return (NSR) control was compared with other treatments using planned contrasts or Dunnett’s post hoc test. Beta diversity was assessed via Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarity. A two-way permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) was used to test the effects of method, rate, and their interaction on bacterial community structure. Redundancy analysis (RDA) in Canoco (v5.0) explored relationships between soil properties and bacterial community composition, with significance validated by Monte Carlo permutation tests (999 permutations). Visualizations were created using OriginPro (2024).
To provide a holistic overview, the entire experimental and analytical framework, encompassing field site characteristics, management practices, laboratory procedures, and statistical analyses, is visually summarized in Figure 1.

3. Results

3.1. Overall Effects of Straw Return Method and Rate

To systematically disentangle the long-term impacts of the management strategies, a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed on the nine straw return treatments for all measured soil physicochemical and biological properties. The results, summarized in Table 2, revealed a clear and overarching pattern: the incorporation method (M) was the overwhelmingly dominant factor driving changes across the soil ecosystem. In contrast, the straw return rate (R) had a significant but far less frequent effect, and the interaction (M × R) between method and rate was rarely significant. This primary finding provides robust statistical support for that central hypothesis, demonstrating that the spatial placement of residue fundamentally governs soil ecosystem responses more than the quantity applied.

3.2. Soil Physical Environment Responses to Straw Return Strategies

After nine years of continuous application, the method of straw incorporation emerged as the primary determinant of the soil hydrothermal regime, fundamentally altering the temperature-moisture dynamics critical for crop establishment. The different strategies sculpted distinct physical environments, highlighting a clear trade-off between soil warming and water conservation.
Annual monitoring revealed significant inter-annual fluctuations in soil temperature, yet a clear and consistent thermal hierarchy among treatments was maintained throughout the nine-year period (Figure 2a). As summarized in Table 2, this hierarchy was statistically driven by a highly significant main effect of the incorporation method (p < 0.001), while the straw return rate had no significant effect (p > 0.05). This hierarchy was governed by the incorporation method. Surface mulching (MUL) treatments consistently induced the most significant thermal penalty; averaged across nine years, the MUL-100 treatment recorded the lowest mean temperature (10.0 °C), a substantial 3.3 °C reduction compared to the no-straw control (NSR) at 13.3 °C (Figure 2b). In stark contrast, incorporation methods offered a direct solution to this chilling effect. Rotary tillage (ROT) proved most effective at mitigating soil cooling, with mean temperatures (11.8 °C to 12.4 °C) only moderately lower (1.1–1.7 °C) than the control, while deep plowing (PLW) showed an intermediate thermal response.
The annual dynamics of soil water content (SWC) exhibited considerable year-to-year variability, likely driven by annual differences in spring precipitation and antecedent winter conditions (Figure 3a). Throughout the nine-year period, however, a clear trend emerged where surface mulching (MUL) treatments consistently demonstrated an unparalleled capacity for moisture conservation, a separation particularly evident in drier years. Averaged across the nine years, this persistent water-conserving effect resulted in the MUL-100 treatment achieving the highest mean SWC of 13.6%, a remarkable 44% increase over the 9.5% recorded in the NSR control (Figure 3b). While sacrificing this maximum water retention, the incorporation methods still provided significant hydrological benefits. ROT treatments increased mean SWC by 24–33% relative to the control, whereas the benefits from PLW treatments were more modest at 2–7%.

3.3. Soil Chemical and Biological Environment Transformations

The sustained, nine-year application of different straw return strategies prompted significant transformations in the soil’s core chemical and biological properties. As confirmed by the overall ANOVA (Table 2), these changes were predominantly dictated by the incorporation method rather than the rate.
Annual measurements revealed a clear and progressive long-term trend of acidification across all straw return treatments. In stark contrast, the no-straw control (NSR) did not follow this acidification trend and instead exhibited a slight but consistent increase in pH over the nine-year period (Figure 4a). The trajectory of this acidification varied by method, with MUL and ROT treatments generally showing a more rapid decline in the initial years, while PLW treatments exhibited a more gradual but steady decrease. Averaged across the nine years, this resulted in the most pronounced pH decline being observed under deep plowing (PLW) treatments, where mean pH values dropped to a range of 6.36 to 6.50. Surface mulching (MUL) and rotary tillage (ROT) treatments also induced significant acidification, with mean pH values in the ranges of 6.54 to 6.69 and 6.49 to 6.59, respectively.
Using two-way ANOVA (Table 2), it was confirmed that nitrogen sequestration was significantly influenced by the incorporation method, the return rate, and, crucially, their interaction (p < 0.05). Annual monitoring of total nitrogen (TN) illustrated the long-term trajectory of nitrogen sequestration, revealing a clear hierarchy where incorporation methods proved substantially more effective than surface mulching (Figure 5a). The incorporation treatments (ROT and PLW) exhibited a distinct pattern of accumulation, with TN levels increasing steadily over the initial 3–5 years before reaching a new, elevated equilibrium. This resulted in significant long-term gains; averaged over nine years, rotary tillage (ROT) treatments proved most effective at nitrogen sequestration, increasing TN by 13–23% relative to the control and culminating in the highest overall mean value of 1.75 g/kg in the ROT-50 treatment (Figure 5b). Deep plowing (PLW) and surface mulching (MUL) also led to considerable accumulation, with increases ranging from 6 to 14% and 7 to 16%, respectively. This highlights that while direct incorporation via rotary tillage is the superior strategy, high rates of surface mulching can be more effective for nitrogen build-up than deep plowing.
The changes in soil microbial biomass carbon (SMBC) showed the most pronounced differentiation among strategies (Figure 6a), a result statistically underpinned by a powerful main effect from the incorporation method (p < 0.001, Table 2), while rate and interaction effects were non-significant (p > 0.05). The annual dynamics of soil microbial biomass carbon (SMBC), a sensitive indicator of biological activity, closely mirrored the trends observed for total nitrogen and showed the most pronounced differentiation among strategies (Figure 6a). The ROT treatments, in particular, showed a rapid and substantial increase in SMBC within the first few years before stabilizing at a significantly higher level. Averaged over nine years, this resulted in SMBC levels being elevated by a substantial 19–29% over the control, reaching a peak of 236 mg/kg in the ROT-100 treatment (Figure 6b). Deep plowing (PLW) also fostered significant enhancement (10–19% increase), though to a lesser extent. Notably, surface mulching treatments yielded the smallest gains (8–17%), strongly indicating that direct soil-straw contact, as achieved by incorporation, is essential for fueling sustained, long-term microbial growth and establishing a larger, more active microbial biomass pool.

3.4. Bacterial Community Structure and Diversity Responses

3.4.1. Straw Incorporation Method Modulates Alpha Diversity

The nine-year imposition of distinct straw return strategies acted as powerful ecological filters, culminating in significant and method-dependent alterations to the soil bacterial community. These alterations manifested across multiple ecological scales, from community-level alpha diversity to shifts in taxonomic composition and overall beta-diversity structure. Analysis of alpha diversity metrics (Table 3) revealed that a clear and consistent outcome was the significant enhancement of bacterial community richness across all straw return treatments when compared to the no-straw control (NSR). Both the Chao1 and Ace richness estimators were significantly elevated (p < 0.05) following the long-term addition of organic matter. As shown in overall statistical summary (Table 2), the two-way ANOVA confirmed a significant main effect of incorporation method on the Chao1 richness index (p < 0.01), while the rate of return and the interaction effect were not significant (p > 0.05). The magnitude of this richness boost, however, was dependent on the incorporation method. While surface mulching (MUL) treatments significantly increased richness over the control, the most substantial gains were observed in the soil incorporation treatments. Specifically, the deep plowing (PLW) and rotary tillage (ROT) treatments consistently recorded the highest Chao1 values, indicating that physically mixing straw into the soil was the most effective strategy for increasing the total number of observable bacterial species.
In contrast to the clear enhancement of species richness, the effects on overall community diversity and evenness were more nuanced. Analysis of variance showed that the mean Shannon and Simpson diversity indices were not significantly different among the ten treatments (p > 0.05, Table 3). This indicates that no single management strategy induced a large-scale, categorical shift in community evenness. However, a consistent, albeit non-significant, trend was observed, with rotary tillage (ROT) treatments, particularly ROT-50 and ROT-100, consistently displaying the highest numerical values for the Shannon index. This suggests a more nuanced relationship between the altered soil environment and community structure, indicating the need for correlation analysis.

3.4.2. Straw Incorporation Drives a Fundamental Shift in Bacterial Phylum Composition

The long-term management strategies induced a profound and systematic shift in the taxonomic composition of the bacterial community at the phylum level, underscoring a fundamental reorganization of ecological roles (Figure 7). The most striking pattern was a clear compositional divergence based on whether straw was physically incorporated into the soil.
Treatments involving soil incorporation (ROT and PLW) were characterized by a significantly higher relative abundance of Proteobacteria and Bacteroidota. These two phyla consistently dominated the incorporated-straw communities compared to both the control and the surface mulching treatments. Conversely, the low-disturbance treatments—the no-straw control (NSR) and surface mulching (MUL)—maintained a community with significantly higher relative abundances of Acidobacteriota and Chloroflexota. This diametrically opposed phylum distribution demonstrates that the physical placement of straw, by altering substrate availability and aeration, was the primary factor structuring the community at its highest taxonomic levels.

3.4.3. Community Structure Diverges Based on Management Strategy

The profound compositional shifts at the phylum level translated into a clear, decisive, and statistically significant divergence in the overall bacterial community structure. This was visualized through a Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarity, which measures the compositional difference between samples (Figure 8).
The PCoA ordination plot revealed a powerful and unambiguous segregation of the treatments along the primary axis (PCo1), which alone accounted for a substantial 35.8% of the total community variation. This primary axis separated the treatments into two distinct, non-overlapping groups that corresponded directly to the management approach. The first group, clustering on the positive side of the axis, consisted of all high-disturbance incorporation treatments (ROT and PLW). The second group, clustering on the negative side, was composed of all low-disturbance treatments (NSR and MUL). Critically, within these two major clusters, the different straw application rates (30%, 50%, and 100%) showed no clear separation and were intermingled. This visual separation was statistically confirmed by a two-way PERMANOVA, which revealed a highly significant effect on the incorporation method (R2 = 0.34, p = 0.001) but no significant effect for the return rate (p = 0.21) or the method × rate interaction (p = 0.18).

3.5. Environment-Microbe Linkages and Key Driving Factors

3.5.1. Redundancy Analysis (RDA) of Environment-Microbe Relationships

To mechanistically link the observed shifts in bacterial community structure to the altered soil properties, a Redundancy Analysis (RDA) was performed (Figure 9). The overall RDA model was highly significant (p < 0.01), with the first two axes (RDA1 and RDA2) collectively explaining 73.0% of the constrained variance in bacterial composition (49.1% and 23.9%, respectively). This indicates a strong statistical relationship between the measured environmental variables and the bacterial community structure. A Monte Carlo permutation test identified the explanatory power of the environmental variables in the following order of importance: soil microbial biomass carbon (SMBC) > total nitrogen (TN) > pH > soil water content (SWC) > soil temperature (ST), with SMBC and TN emerging as the most significant drivers (p < 0.01). The ordination biplot visually represents these relationships. The high-disturbance incorporation treatments (ROT and PLW) formed a distinct cluster in the quadrant defined by the vectors for SMBC and TN. Correspondingly, the vectors representing the relative abundances of Proteobacteria and Bacteroidota were strongly and positively aligned with the SMBC and TN vectors in this same quadrant. In contrast, the low-disturbance treatments (NSR and MUL) clustered together in the quadrant primarily defined by the vector for soil pH. The vector for Acidobacteriota showed a clear positive alignment with the pH vector and a negative alignment with the SMBC and TN vectors.

3.5.2. Correlations Between Soil Properties and Bacterial Diversity

Correlation analysis between the primary environmental factors and the calculated alpha diversity indices revealed specific quantitative relationships between soil properties and bacterial diversity (Table 4).
Soil microbial biomass carbon (SMBC) and total nitrogen (TN) exhibited the most consistent and robust positive correlations with community diversity metrics. SMBC was significantly and positively correlated with the Chao1 richness index (r = 0.586, p < 0.05), the Ace richness index (r = 0.543, p < 0.05), and the Shannon diversity index (r = 0.628, p < 0.05). Similarly, TN was significantly and positively correlated with the same three indices (Chao1: r = 0.496; Ace: r = 0.461; Shannon: r = 0.589; all p < 0.05).
Conversely, soil pH showed a significant negative correlation with both the Chao1 richness index (r = −0.452, p < 0.05) and the Shannon diversity index (r = −0.443, p < 0.05). Among the physical factors, soil water content (SWC) was also found to be significantly and positively correlated with the richness indices Chao1 and Ace. In contrast to the other diversity metrics, the Simpson index showed no significant correlation with any of the measured environmental factors. Notably, the significant positive correlation between the Shannon index and key biogeochemical drivers (SMBC, TN) provides a deeper insight that complements the ANOVA results. While the ANOVA indicated that treatment mean diversity did not differ significantly, the correlation analysis, which leverages the continuous gradient across all 30 samples, reveals a fundamental principle: bacterial diversity was tightly coupled to the underlying soil fertility. In other words, as the soil environment became more resource-rich—as indicated by higher SMBC and TN—the bacterial community consistently trended towards a more diverse state, even if this trend was not strong enough to create statistically distinct diversity levels between any two specific treatments.

4. Discussion

4.1. Spatial Placement of Residue, Not Quantity, Resolves the Hydrothermal and Biogeochemical Trade-Offs of Straw Return

The nine-year field experiment in present study unequivocally demonstrated that the spatial placement of crop residue, not its application rate, is the decisive factor shaping the soil physicochemical environment. This pivotal insight provides a direct resolution to the long-standing “agronomic paradox” that has historically hindered straw return adoption in cold-climate breadbaskets like the Mollisol region of Northeast China. By systematically deconstructing the interconnected trade-offs between soil hydrothermal regulation and biogeochemical enrichment, it was revealed that management strategies, through their control of residue placement at the soil-atmosphere interface, fundamentally govern the ecological function of returned straw and the long-term trajectory of soil health.
The most immediate and consequential trade-off manifested in the soil hydrothermal regime, creating a direct conflict between water conservation and the thermal conditions required for spring crop establishment. Obtained results confirmed that surface mulching (MUL) represents an extreme form of single-objective optimization. Its efficacy for water conservation was unparalleled; the MUL-50 treatment, for instance, increased soil water content by a remarkable 44% over the no-straw control (NSR). This is a direct consequence of the physical barrier formed by the straw mat, a well-documented ‘blanket effect’ that curtails evaporative losses. This phenomenon, as also reported by Gómez-Muñoz et al. [19] and Neha et al. [20] in other temperate agroecosystems, effectively preserves vital moisture. However, this hydrological gain was acquired at a severe and agronomically unacceptable thermal cost. The same insulating layer that trapped moisture also impeded solar energy transfer into the soil, suppressing spring soil temperatures by as much as 3.7 °C under the MUL-100 treatment compared to the control. Such “cold and wet” conditions precipitate delayed germination and impaired seedling vigor, as maize, being a C4 plant species, is particularly susceptible to chilling stress through membrane damage, photoinhibition, and disturbed enzyme activity as demonstrated by Farooq et al. [21]. These effects, quantified in controlled studies showing 15–30% reductions in germination rate under similar temperature conditions, represent the primary barrier to farmer adoption in regions with short growing seasons, as detailed by Xia et al. [22].
In stark contrast, physical incorporation of straw via rotary tillage (ROT) and deep plowing (PLW) offered a direct and effective solution to this water-heat conflict. By breaking the surface insulating layer and mixing residue into the soil, these methods allowed for more effective soil warming, with ROT treatments mitigating the chilling effect to a mere 1.1–1.7 °C reduction relative to the control. While this thermal gain involved a predictable compromise on water retention compared to surface mulching, it is critical to note that all incorporation treatments still maintained significantly more moisture than the control. This demonstrates that incorporation does not negate the hydrological benefits of straw return but rather strikes a more agronomically favorable balance, trading a fraction of the maximum potential water savings for a vital improvement in thermal conditions necessary for timely crop establishment.
Beyond this immediate physical recalibration, the long-term divergence in soil biogeochemistry was even more profound, revealing the superior capacity of incorporation methods to build lasting soil fertility. After nine years, incorporation strategies (ROT and PLW) were systematically superior to surface mulching (MUL) in enhancing core fertility indicators like total nitrogen (TN) and soil microbial biomass carbon (SMBC). This superiority is rooted in a fundamental principle: substrate-microbe contact efficiency. When left on the surface, straw decomposition is slow and inefficient, limited by harsh environmental fluctuations and minimal contact with the bulk soil microbial community. As described by Liu et al. [23] and Li et al. [24], mechanically incorporating residue into the soil matrix radically transforms this dynamic. It creates innumerable “microbial hotspots” where straw fragments are brought into intimate contact with soil aggregates, water films, and a diverse consortium of decomposers. This close association dramatically increases the accessibility of carbon and nutrients, while the soil matrix provides a buffered, more stable environment and supplies the mineral nutrients required by microorganisms, thereby accelerating decomposition. This mechanism directly explains the significant enrichment of TN and SMBC pools observed under ROT and PLW treatments, where straw is effectively transformed from a surface barrier into a potent fuel for the soil’s biological engine.
Furthermore, the obtained results revealed a critical distinction between the two incorporation methods, highlighting the importance of distribution uniformity within the plow layer. The superior performance of rotary tillage (ROT), particularly the ROT-50 treatment in accumulating total nitrogen, suggests a distinct advantage over deep plowing. Deep plowing (PLW), which inverted the soil, tends to bury residue in a concentrated layer near the bottom of the plow zone. This practice, as supported by previous work from Liu et al. [25] and Jin et al. [26], can create localized anaerobic zones that inhibit optimal aerobic decomposition and places the fresh substrate in a deeper, often less biologically active and colder stratum. In contrast, rotary tillage (ROT) distributes the residue more homogeneously throughout the topsoil. This uniform distribution fosters a more consistently aerated and biologically active plow layer, optimizing conditions for nutrient cycling across the entire volume and preventing the temporary nitrogen immobilization that can occur in concentrated residue pockets. This superior physical framework for decomposition ultimately translates into more efficient nutrient sequestration and a healthier, more productive soil ecosystem.
In synthesis, this long-term study provided compelling, multi-faceted evidence that the spatial placement of straw is paramount. Surface mulching, while maximizing water retention, imposes an unacceptable thermal penalty and fails to efficiently translate residue into soil fertility, thus perpetuating the agronomic paradox. In contrast, soil incorporation resolves this primary conflict and, more importantly, unlocks the full biogeochemical potential of the returned residue by maximizing substrate-microbe interactions. This establishes a robust, process-based framework for optimizing straw management, decisively shifting the focus from the simplistic question of “how much” residue to return, to the more critical and functionally relevant question of “where it is placed within the soil ecosystem.

4.2. Straw Return Strategies as Deterministic Filters Shaping Bacterial Community Assembly

4.2.1. Altered Soil Conditions Modulate Bacterial Alpha Diversity

A consistent outcome across all straw return treatments was an enhancement of bacterial alpha diversity relative to the no-straw control, yet the magnitude and nature of this enhancement were intricately linked to the incorporation method. Present results strongly support the Resource Availability Hypothesis, which, as proposed by Duan et al. [27] and Yang et al. [28], posits that increased resource abundance and heterogeneity can support greater species diversity. The soil incorporation treatments (ROT and PLW) created environments rich in freshly supplied, labile carbon and subsequently elevated total nitrogen (TN) and soil microbial biomass carbon (SMBC). This enrichment of key limiting resources effectively expanded the number of available ecological niches, thereby supporting a more species-rich bacterial community. This is directly evidenced by the significant positive correlations observed between SMBC, TN, and the richness and diversity indices (Table 4).
Interestingly, the obtained data revealed a nuanced distinction between community richness and evenness. While deep plowing (PLW) treatments fostered some of the highest species richness (Chao1 index), the rotary tillage (ROT) treatments consistently yielded the highest Shannon diversity, an index that accounts for both richness and evenness. This suggests different mechanisms of diversity enhancement. Deep plowing creates stable microniches in the lower topsoil that support specialist taxa, while rotary tillage produces uniformly resource-rich conditions favoring copiotrophic species coexistence as established by Gaitanis et al. [29] and Pingthaisong et al. [30]. The latter promotes more evenly structured communities with enhanced functional resilience.
Crucially, this study also clarifies the role of soil pH in modulating bacterial diversity in this context. The significant negative correlation between pH and diversity indices might initially seem paradoxical. However, this correlation represents a concomitant effect rather than a direct causal driver of diversity. The acidification itself is a predictable consequence of intensified biological activity fueled by straw incorporation. Acidification occurs through three established mechanisms as documented by Bian et al. [31], Macreadie et al. [32] and Lewoyehu et al. [33]: organic acid release during straw decomposition including acetic and oxalic acids, increased CO2 production from enhanced microbial respiration forming carbonic acid, and proton release during intensified nitrification processes. Therefore, the observed pH decline is a signature of a highly active, resource-rich system. The overwhelmingly positive influence of this enhanced resource availability on niche partitioning far outweighed any potential negative selective pressure from the moderate acidification.

4.2.2. Deterministic Assembly Drives a Fundamental Shift in Bacterial Composition

Beyond modulating overall diversity, the straw incorporation method acted as a powerful deterministic force driving a fundamental and predictable shift in the taxonomic composition of the bacterial community. The observed changes align perfectly with the established copiotroph-oligotroph framework, a cornerstone of microbial ecology. The low-disturbance, relatively resource-poor environments of the no-straw control (NSR) and surface mulching (MUL) treatments selected for oligotrophic taxa (often termed K-strategists). Phyla such as Acidobacteriota and Chloroflexota, which dominated these treatments, are well-known for their metabolic efficiency and ability to thrive under stable, low-nutrient conditions, as documented in numerous studies by Zhang et al. [34] and Wei et al. [35].
In stark contrast, the incorporation of straw via rotary tillage (ROT) and deep plowing (PLW) represented a regular, high-intensity resource pulse. This condition created a strong selective pressure favoring copiotrophic taxa (r-strategists), which are adapted for rapid growth and resource monopolization when labile carbon is abundant. The significant enrichment of phyla like Proteobacteria and Bacteroidota in these treatments was a classic signature of such a copiotrophic response. This profound taxonomic reorganization from an oligotroph-dominated to a copiotroph-dominated community represented the primary ecological consequence of long-term straw incorporation.
Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) provided unequivocal evidence for this deterministic assembly process. The ordination plot starkly segregated the treatments into two distinct, non-overlapping clusters along the primary axis, which alone explained a substantial 35.8% of the community variation. This powerful separation confirms that the physical act of soil incorporation is the primary ecological filter shaping the bacterial community structure. The fact that samples from different application rates (30%, 50%, and 100%) were intermingled within their respective method-based clusters further reinforces central conclusion of the current paper: the method of incorporation is a far more influential driver of community assembly than the rate of application.
Finally, the Redundancy Analysis (RDA) mechanistically linked these structural shifts to the altered soil environment. The analysis confirmed that the community structure was most strongly governed by SMBC and TN, not the physical parameters of temperature or moisture. The RDA biplot clearly illustrates that the proliferation of copiotrophic phyla (Proteobacteria, Bacteroidota) was fueled by the elevated SMBC and TN in the ROT and PLW treatments. This establishes a clear causal chain: straw placement dictates substrate-microbe contact, which in turn governs biogeochemical cycling, and this altered biogeochemical landscape ultimately selects for a predictable and functionally distinct microbial community.

4.3. An Evidence-Based Framework for Optimal Straw Management in Temperate Agroecosystems

The ultimate goal of agricultural science is to translate complex ecological understanding into actionable strategies that enhance productivity while safeguarding natural resources. This comprehensive, long-term investigation moves beyond the evaluation of isolated variables to construct a holistic, systems-level understanding of how management choices propagate through the soil ecosystem. By synthesizing the interconnected responses of soil physics, biogeochemistry, and microbial ecology, it could now be definitively identified as a management practice that resolves the critical “agronomic paradox” and provides a scientifically validated pathway towards sustainable intensification in the Mollisol region. This synthesis unequivocally points to rotary tillage with a 50% straw return rate (ROT-50) as the optimal strategy.
The superiority of the ROT-50 practice is rooted in its ability to achieve a synergistic balance across multiple, often competing, soil health objectives. Its most immediate and critical advantage is the effective resolution of the water-heat conflict. Unlike surface mulching (MUL), which imposes a severe thermal penalty that renders it agronomically unviable in cold spring climates, the ROT-50 strategy facilitates crucial soil warming. Simultaneously, it represents a judicious compromise on moisture management, maintaining significantly higher soil water content than the no-straw control, thereby conserving precious water without sacrificing essential thermal gains. This practice directly addresses the primary barrier to straw return adoption by ensuring favorable conditions for the current crop’s germination and establishment.
However, the most profound benefits of the ROT-50 strategy lie in its capacity to function as a powerful biogeochemical engine, transforming straw residue into lasting soil fertility. The obtained results demonstrate that this practice achieved the highest accumulation of soil total nitrogen (TN) among all ten treatments, while concurrently fostering a robust and highly active pool of soil microbial biomass carbon (SMBC). This indicates that the ROT-50 treatment created an ideal “bioreactor” environment. The rotary tillage action ensures an optimal substrate-microbe contact efficiency, thoroughly mixing the high-carbon straw (the energy source) with the mineral soil, which contains the nitrogen and other nutrients required by the microbial decomposers. This efficient integration fuels the copiotroph-dominated microbial community that excels at rapidly cycling nutrients and incorporating them into stable microbial biomass and, eventually, long-term soil organic matter. This stands in stark contrast to the inefficient decomposition observed under surface mulching and the potentially suboptimal conditions created by deep plowing’s concentrated residue layer.
Furthermore, the ROT-50 strategy was instrumental in cultivating a highly resilient soil microbial community. It consistently yielded one of the highest numerical values for the Shannon diversity index. While the differences in mean diversity among treatments were not statistically significant in a direct ANOVA comparison, the correlation analysis revealed a crucial underlying principle: Shannon diversity was strongly and significantly correlated with the key fertility indicators of SMBC (r = 0.628, p < 0.05) and TN (r = 0.589, p < 0.05). Therefore, by creating the most biologically active and nitrogen-rich environment, the ROT-50 strategy promoted a community structure trending towards the highest diversity and its associated functional resilience.
Finally, this research provides a clear, evidence-based refutation of the simplistic “more is better” approach to straw return. The data obtained demonstrate that applying 100% of the residue (ROT-100) leads to diminishing returns in cold-climate agroecosystems, likely because low temperature constrains straw degradation, as Huang et al. [36] established. Incorporating 100% of the residue can overwhelm soil decomposer capacity in cold conditions, where high C:N, lignin, cellulose, and hemicellulose contents slow decomposition and mineralization; consequently, undecomposed straw may persist and impair seedbed structure, as Hassan et al. [37] reported for rice straw residues under controlled temperature–moisture regimes. These constraints create excessive porosity and hinder intimate seed-to-soil contact required for water uptake and successful germination and are likely compounded by transient N immobilization associated with high C:N. In contrast, the 50% rate (ROT-50) provides substantial organic matter input without triggering these adverse physical and biogeochemical feedback, thereby reconciling the short-term need for a warm, well-structured seedbed with the long-term goal of soil conservation through organic matter accrual.

5. Conclusions

This nine-year field experiment provides a scientifically grounded resolution to the foundational agronomic conflict that has long constrained sustainable agriculture in temperate Mollisols. The present findings fundamentally reframe the management paradigm for crop residue, demonstrating that the spatial placement of straw, not its application rate, is the paramount factor governing the long-term trajectory of soil health and microbial community assembly. By establishing the mechanistic pathway from management to microbial succession, this work provides an evidence-based framework for transforming returned residue from a passive surface barrier into a potent engine for soil regeneration. The principal conclusions are as follows:
(1) The method of straw incorporation, not the application rate, is the overwhelmingly dominant driver of ecosystem change. This principle is statistically validated by the obtained two-way ANOVA and PERMANOVA results. For nearly all the measured soil properties and for the overall bacterial community structure, the incorporation method showed a highly significant main effect, while the main effect of application rate and the method × rate interaction were often non-significant. This provides powerful, long-term evidence that the “how” and “where of residue placement far outweighs the “how much” in determining the final, stable state of the soil ecosystem.
(2) Straw incorporation acts as a deterministic ecological filter, driving a functional shift in the bacterial community. The physical placement of straw dictates the dominant microbial life-history strategy. Low-disturbance surface mulching selected for an oligotrophic community (e.g., Acidobacteriota), adapted to stable, low-nutrient conditions. In stark contrast, physically incorporating straw created a resource-rich environment that fueled a fundamental shift to a copiotrophic community (e.g., Proteobacteria, Bacteroidota). This transition from a slow-growing to a dynamic, fast-cycling microbial system is the core mechanistic pathway underpinning the enhanced nutrient cycling and fertility observed in incorporation treatments.
(3) Rotary tillage with 50% residue return (ROT-50) emerged as the optimal strategy among the tested alternatives through multi-objective synergy. This specific strategy proved superior by concurrently resolving multiple agronomic challenges. It successfully mitigated spring soil cooling without forfeiting crucial moisture gains, thus solving the primary water-heat conflict. Critically, it proved most effective for building long-term fertility, achieving the highest total nitrogen accumulation, and fostering a highly active microbial biomass. Furthermore, by fostering the most active microbial biomass and achieving the highest nitrogen accumulation, it cultivated a bacterial community that trended towards the highest Shannon diversity, suggesting enhanced functional redundancy and greater resilience to environmental stress. The ROT-50 strategy therefore represents the most effective, evidence-based pathway to reconcile immediate agronomic needs with long-term soil regeneration.
The present work establishes a new benchmark for residue management, framing these practices as powerful tools for applied microbial ecology that actively select for desired functional traits within the soil microbiome. Through this comprehensive nine-year investigation, we have demonstrated that the ROT-50 strategy provides a scientifically validated solution to the longstanding agronomic paradox in cold climate agriculture, shifting the paradigm from residue quantity to strategic placement for sustainable intensification. While our findings are robust within the scope of this single-site, Mollisol-based study focusing on bacterial communities, several areas warrant investigation to fully realize the global potential of this approach. It was acknowledged that a key frontier for future research is to transition from documenting these compositional shifts to directly validating their functional consequences. Priority research directions include: (1) multi-site validation across different soil types and climatic zones to establish broader applicability; (2) comprehensive assessment of the entire soil microbiome including fungal communities and their interactions with bacterial communities; (3) direct evaluation of crop yield responses and economic viability under the ROT-50 strategy; (4) long-term soil carbon sequestration studies to understand how the ROT-50 strategy influences the formation of stable soil organic matter, particularly its contribution to the mineral-associated organic matter (MAOM) pool, to verify its climate mitigation potential; (5) sustainable intensification research assessing the capacity of this optimized strategy to reduce the input of artificial nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers while maintaining the same or higher yield of cultivated field crops, thereby validating its potential for truly sustainable intensification in global temperate agriculture. Despite these research priorities, this study provides compelling evidence that strategic straw placement can transform residue management from a simple waste disposal practice into a sophisticated tool for soil health enhancement. The ROT-50 strategy emerges not merely as a best practice but as a paradigm shift that reconciles immediate agronomic needs with long-term soil sustainability, offering a pathway forward for climate-smart agriculture in the world’s critical grain-producing regions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.Z. and M.G.; methodology, Y.G. and M.G.; software, L.R. and Y.W.; validation, C.Z.; formal analysis, Y.W.; investigation, L.R., Y.W. and C.Z.; resources, J.Z.; data curation, S.W.; writing—original draft preparation, S.W. and J.Z.; writing—review and editing, S.W. and J.Z.; visualization, Y.G.; supervision, M.G.; project administration, J.Z. and M.G.; funding acquisition, Y.G. and M.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2024YFD1500304), the Science and Technology Research Project of Jilin Provincial Education Department (No. JJKH20241313HT).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed at the corresponding authors.

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our sincere gratitude to the Harbin Academy of Agricultural Sciences. This study was critically dependent on their generous provision of soil samples from the long-term field experiment, and we deeply appreciate the tremendous effort from the researchers and their team in meticulously maintaining this valuable experimental platform for over nine years.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Alewell, C.; Ringeval, B.; Ballabio, C.; Robinson, D.A.; Panagos, P.; Borrelli, P. Global phosphorus shortage will be aggravated by soil erosion. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 4546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Devkota, M.; Devkota, K.P.; Kumar, S. Conservation agriculture improves agronomic, economic, and soil fertility indicators for a clay soil in a rainfed Mediterranean climate in Morocco. Agric. Syst. 2022, 201, 103470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wang, Y.; Yu, H.J.; Wang, S.J.; Li, H.Q.; Wang, Y.T. Unveiling trends and environmental impacts of global black soil crop production: A comprehensive assessment. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2024, 208, 107717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kaur, M.; Malik, D.P.; Malhi, G.S.; Sardana, V.; Bolan, N.S.; Lal, R.; Siddique, K.H.M. Rice residue management in the Indo-Gangetic Plains for climate and food security. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2022, 42, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yuan, G.Y.; Huan, W.W.; Song, H.; Lu, D.J.; Chen, X.Q.; Wang, H.Y.; Zhou, J.M. Effects of straw incorporation and potassium fertilizer on crop yields, soil organic carbon, and active carbon in the rice-wheat system. Soil Tillage Res. 2021, 209, 104958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, Y.L.; Zhang, X.L.; Lou, Z.X.; An, X.Y.; Li, X.; Jiang, X.B.; Wang, W.D.; Zhao, H.Y.; Fu, M.J.; Cui, Z.J. The effects of adding exogenous lignocellulose degrading bacteria during straw incorporation in cold regions on degradation characteristics and soil indigenous bacteria communities. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1141545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. He, P.; Li, L.J.; Dai, S.S.; Guo, X.L.; Nie, M.; Yang, X.C.; Kuzyakov, Y. Straw addition and low soil moisture decreased temperature sensitivity and activation energy of soil organic matter. Geoderma 2024, 442, 116802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, J.Q.; Han, Y.H.; Zhou, C.; Xu, T.; Qu, Z.C.; Ma, B.; Yuan, M.; Wang, L.X.; Liu, Y.; Li, Q.C.; et al. Effects of depth of straw returning on maize yield potential and greenhouse gas emissions. Front. Plant Sci. 2024, 15, 1344647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Nichols, V.; Verhulst, N.; Cox, R.; Govaerts, B. Weed dynamics and conservation agriculture principles: A review. Field Crops Res. 2015, 183, 56–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yu, C.L.; Mawodza, T.; Atkinson, B.S.; Atkinson, J.A.; Sturrock, C.J.; Whalley, R.; Hawkesford, M.J.; Cooper, H.; Zhang, X.X.; Zhou, H.; et al. The effects of soil compaction on wheat seedling root growth are specific to soil texture and soil moisture status. Rhizosphere 2024, 29, 100838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhao, J.L.; Wang, X.G.; Zhuang, J.; Cong, Y.J.; Lu, Y.; Guo, M.Z. Fine-Crush straw returning enhances dry matter accumulation rate of maize seedlings in Northeast China. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sun, Y.Y.; Ren, B.D.; Liu, C.; Yan, B.C.; Lin, L.; Zhao, Y.Z.; Xu, H.; Zhang, W.Z.; Cheng, X.Y.; Han, X.R. Evaluating the adaptability and sustainability of different straw incorporation strategies in Northeastern China: Impacts on rice yield formation, nitrogen use efficiency, and temporal soil nutrient dynamics. Agronomy 2025, 15, 729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhang, P.; Chen, P.; Nie, T.Z.; Zhang, Z.X.; Li, T.C.; Dai, C.L.; Jiang, L.L.; Wu, Y.; Sun, Z.Y.; Yin, S. Long-term straw incorporation under controlled irrigation improves soil quality of paddy field and rice yield in Northeast China. Plants 2024, 13, 1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, J.J.; Sun, X.; Du, L.N.; Sun, W.L.; Wang, X.L.; Gaafar, A.R.Z.; Zhang, P.; Cai, T.; Liu, T.N.; Jia, Z.K.; et al. Appropriate fertilization increases carbon and nitrogen sequestration and economic benefit for straw-incorporated upland farming. Geoderma 2024, 441, 116743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhang, X.T.; Wang, J.; Feng, X.Y.; Yang, H.S.; Li, Y.L.; Yakov, K.; Liu, S.P.; Li, F.M. Effects of tillage on soil organic carbon and crop yield under straw return. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2023, 354, 108543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tang, H.M.; Li, C.; Cheng, K.K.; Shi, L.H.; Wen, L.; Xu, Y.L.; Wang, K.; Li, W.Y. Effects of short-term tillage management on soil organic carbon and its labile fractions under the double-cropping rice system in Southern of China. Exp. Agric. 2025, 61, e16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Joergensen, R.G.; Wu, J.S.; Brookes, P.C. Measuring soil microbial biomass using an automated procedure. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2011, 43, 873–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhao, J.; Rodriguez, J.; Martens-Habbena, W. Fine-scale evaluation of two standard 16S rRNA gene amplicon primer pairs for analysis of total prokaryotes and archaeal nitrifiers in differently managed soils. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1140487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gómez-Muñoz, B.; Jensen, L.S.; Munkholm, L.; Olesen, J.E.; Hansen, E.M.; Bruun, S. Long-term effect of tillage and straw retention in conservation agriculture systems on soil carbon storage. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2021, 85, 1465–1478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Neha; Yadav, G.; Yadav, R.K.; Kumar, A.; Rai, A.K.; Onishi, J.; Omori, K.; Sharma, P.C. Salt removal through residue-filled cut-soiler simulated preferential shallow subsurface drainage improves yield, quality and plant water relations of mustard (Brassica juncea L.). Sustainability 2022, 14, 4146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Farooq, M.; Aziz, T.; Wahid, A.; Lee, D.J.; Siddique, K.H.M. Chilling tolerance in maize: Agronomic and physiological approaches. Crop Pasture Sci. 2009, 60, 501–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Xia, Z.Q.; Zhang, S.B.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, G.X.; Fu, Y.F.; Lu, H.D. Effects of root zone warming on maize seedling growth and photosynthetic characteristics under different phosphorus levels. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 746152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Liu, N.; Li, Y.Y.; Cong, P.; Wang, J.; Guo, W.; Pang, H.C.; Zhang, L. Depth of straw incorporation significantly alters crop yield, soil organic carbon and total nitrogen in the North China Plain. Soil Tillage Res. 2021, 205, 104772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Li, Y.; Feng, H.; Dong, Q.G.; Xia, L.L.; Li, J.C.; Li, C.; Zang, H.D.; Andersen, M.N.; Olesen, J.E.; Jorgensen, U.; et al. Ammoniated straw incorporation increases wheat yield, yield stability, soil organic carbon and soil total nitrogen content. Field Crops Res. 2022, 284, 108558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liu, L.; Cheng, M.; Yang, L.; Gu, X.Y.; Jin, J.Y.; Fu, M.J. Regulation of straw decomposition and its effect on soil function by the amount of returned straw in a cool zone rice crop system. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 15673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jin, Z.Q.; Shah, T.R.; Zhang, L.; Liu, H.Y.; Peng, S.B.; Nie, L.X. Effect of straw returning on soil organic carbon in rice-wheat rotation system: A review. Food Energy Secur. 2020, 9, e200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Duan, P.P.; Fu, R.T.; Nottingham, A.T.; Domeignoz-Horta, L.A.; Yang, X.Y.; Du, H.; Wang, K.L.; Li, D.J. Tree species diversity increases soil microbial carbon use efficiency in a subtropical forest. Glob. Change Biol. 2023, 29, 7131–7144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yang, F.; Chen, Q.; Zhang, Q.; Long, C.Y.; Jia, W.; Cheng, X.L. Keystone species affect the relationship between soil microbial diversity and ecosystem function under land use change in subtropical China. Funct. Ecol. 2021, 35, 1159–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gaitanis, D.; Lukac, M.; Tibbett, M. Fragment size and diversity of mulches affect their decomposition, nutrient dynamics, and mycorrhizal root colonisation. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 9383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Pingthaisong, W.; Blagodatsky, S.; Vityakon, P.; Cadisch, G. Mixing plant residues of different quality reduces priming effect and contributes to soil carbon retention. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2024, 188, 109242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bian, F.; Wang, Y.H.; Ren, H.X.; Wan, L.Z.; Guo, H.D.; Jia, Y.X.; Liu, X.; Ning, F.H.; Shi, G.J.; Ren, P.F. A Fungi-Driven Sustainable Circular Model Restores Saline Coastal Soils and Boosts Farm Returns. Horticulturae 2025, 11, 730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Macreadie, P.I.; Serrano, O.; Maher, D.T.; Duarte, C.M.; Beardall, J. Addressing calcium carbonate cycling in blue carbon accounting. Limnol. Oceanogr. Lett. 2017, 2, 195–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lewoyehu, M.; Kohira, Y.; Fentie, D.; Addisu, S.; Sato, S. Water Hyacinth Biochar: A Sustainable Approach for Enhancing Soil Resistance to Acidification Stress and Nutrient Dynamics in an Acidic Nitisol of the Northwest Highlands of Ethiopia. Sustainability 2024, 16, 5537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhang, H.; Jiang, N.; Zhang, S.Y.; Zhu, X.Y.; Wang, H.; Xiu, W.M.; Zhao, J.N.; Liu, H.M.; Zhang, H.F.; Yang, D.L. Soil bacterial community composition is altered more by soil nutrient availability than pH following long-term nutrient addition in a temperate steppe. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 15, 1455891. [Google Scholar]
  35. Wei, Y.L.; Wang, F.; Gao, J.L.; Huang, Y.L.; Ren, W.; Sheng, H.M. Culture-dependent and culture-independent characterization of bacterial community diversity in different types of sandy lands: The case of Minqin County, China. BMC Microbiol. 2021, 21, 87. [Google Scholar]
  36. Huang, Y.Y.; Yan, Y.Y.; Ma, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, Q.; Men, M.; Huang, Y.L.; Peng, Z.P. The effect of low-temperature straw-degrading microbes on winter wheat growth and soil improvement under straw return. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 15, 1391632. [Google Scholar]
  37. Hassan, W. C and N mineralization and dissolved organic matter potentials of two contrasting plant residues: Effects of residue type, moisture, and temperature. Acta Agric. Scand. Sect. B—Soil Plant Sci. 2013, 63, 642–652. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Graphical overview of the long-term experimental design and analytical workflow. The yellow star on the map indicates the location of the experimental site in Heilongjiang Province, China. Abbreviations: ST, soil temperature; SWC, soil water content; TN, total nitrogen; SMBC, soil microbial biomass carbon; PCoA, principal coordinate analysis; RDA, redundancy analysis.
Figure 1. Graphical overview of the long-term experimental design and analytical workflow. The yellow star on the map indicates the location of the experimental site in Heilongjiang Province, China. Abbreviations: ST, soil temperature; SWC, soil water content; TN, total nitrogen; SMBC, soil microbial biomass carbon; PCoA, principal coordinate analysis; RDA, redundancy analysis.
Agriculture 15 01936 g001
Figure 2. Soil temperature under straw return strategies: (a) Annual dynamics over the nine-year period; (b) Mean values across nine years. Different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.
Figure 2. Soil temperature under straw return strategies: (a) Annual dynamics over the nine-year period; (b) Mean values across nine years. Different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.
Agriculture 15 01936 g002
Figure 3. Soil water content under straw return strategies: (a) Annual dynamics over the nine-year period; (b) Mean values across nine years. Different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.
Figure 3. Soil water content under straw return strategies: (a) Annual dynamics over the nine-year period; (b) Mean values across nine years. Different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.
Agriculture 15 01936 g003
Figure 4. Soil pH under straw return strategies: (a) Annual dynamics over the nine-year period; (b) Mean values across nine years. Different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.
Figure 4. Soil pH under straw return strategies: (a) Annual dynamics over the nine-year period; (b) Mean values across nine years. Different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.
Agriculture 15 01936 g004
Figure 5. Soil total nitrogen under straw return strategies: (a) Annual dynamics over the nine-year period; (b) Mean values across nine years. Different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.
Figure 5. Soil total nitrogen under straw return strategies: (a) Annual dynamics over the nine-year period; (b) Mean values across nine years. Different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.
Agriculture 15 01936 g005
Figure 6. Soil microbial biomass carbon under straw return strategies: (a) Annual dynamics over the nine-year period; (b) Mean values across nine years. Different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.
Figure 6. Soil microbial biomass carbon under straw return strategies: (a) Annual dynamics over the nine-year period; (b) Mean values across nine years. Different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.
Agriculture 15 01936 g006
Figure 7. Relative abundance of the dominant bacterial phyla, highlighting the shift from oligotrophic to copiotrophic dominance in response to straw incorporation.
Figure 7. Relative abundance of the dominant bacterial phyla, highlighting the shift from oligotrophic to copiotrophic dominance in response to straw incorporation.
Agriculture 15 01936 g007
Figure 8. Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarity, illustrating the structural divergence of soil bacterial communities driven by different straw return strategies.
Figure 8. Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarity, illustrating the structural divergence of soil bacterial communities driven by different straw return strategies.
Agriculture 15 01936 g008
Figure 9. Redundancy Analysis (RDA) ordination biplot showing the relationships between soil physicochemical properties and the relative abundance of dominant bacterial phyla.
Figure 9. Redundancy Analysis (RDA) ordination biplot showing the relationships between soil physicochemical properties and the relative abundance of dominant bacterial phyla.
Agriculture 15 01936 g009
Table 1. Description of the experimental treatments.
Table 1. Description of the experimental treatments.
Straw Return
Strategies
Treatment CodeStraw Return
Rate (%)
Description
No straw returnNSR0All straw residue was removed from the plot after harvest.
Surface Mulching
(MUL)
MUL-303030% of chopped straw residue was spread evenly on the soil surface.
MUL-505050% of chopped straw residue was spread evenly on the soil surface.
MUL-100100100% of chopped straw residue was spread evenly on the soil surface.
Rotary Tillage
(ROT)
ROT-303030% of chopped straw was uniformly mixed into the 0–20 cm soil layer with a rotary tiller.
ROT-505050% of chopped straw was uniformly mixed into the 0–20 cm soil layer with a rotary tiller.
ROT-100100100% of chopped straw was uniformly mixed into the 0–20 cm soil layer with a rotary tiller.
Deep Plowing
(PLW)
PLW-303030% of chopped straw was inverted and buried within the 0–20 cm soil layer using a moldboard plow.
PLW-505050% of chopped straw was inverted and buried within the 0–20 cm soil layer using a moldboard plow.
PLW-100100100% of chopped straw was inverted and buried within the 0–20 cm soil layer using a moldboard plow.
Table 2. Summary of two-way ANOVA results for the effects of incorporation method (M), return rate (R), and their interaction (M × R) on key soil properties and bacterial diversity indices.
Table 2. Summary of two-way ANOVA results for the effects of incorporation method (M), return rate (R), and their interaction (M × R) on key soil properties and bacterial diversity indices.
VariableMethod (M)Rate (R)M × R Interaction
ST***nsns
SWC****ns
pH**nsns
TN*****
SMBC***nsns
Chao1 Richness**nsns
Shannon Diversitynsnsns
Abbreviations: ST, soil temperature; SWC, soil water content; TN, total nitrogen; SMBC, soil microbial biomass carbon. Significance levels: *** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05; ns, not significant (p > 0.05).
Table 3. Alpha diversity indices of soil bacterial communities under different long-term straw return strategies.
Table 3. Alpha diversity indices of soil bacterial communities under different long-term straw return strategies.
Straw Return
Strategies
Chao1AceShannonSimpsonCoverage
NSR2133.465 ± 113.349 c2170.960 ± 92.378 b6.230 ± 0.025 a0.00428 ± 0.00004 a0.994
MUL-302611.727 ± 141.256 b2606.102 ± 113.022 a6.322 ± 0.069 a0.00429 ± 0.00052 a0.993
MUL-502629.199 ± 140.033 b2622.930 ± 217.688 a6.341 ± 0.043 a0.00437 ± 0.00029 a0.996
MUL-1002638.145 ± 137.256 b2623.991 ± 79.439 a6.339 ± 0.069 a0.00433 ± 0.00019 a0.994
ROT-302689.567 ± 138.542 b2637.469 ± 191.442 a6.433 ± 0.032 a0.00442 ± 0.00024 a0.991
ROT-502796.530 ± 145.551 a2725.759 ± 240.350 a6.483 ± 0.067 a0.00461 ± 0.00013 a0.997
ROT-1002792.063 ± 138.453 a2728.190 ± 168.234 a6.477 ± 0.005 a0.00462 ± 0.00012 a0.995
PLW-302752.665 ± 190.875 a2599.507 ± 218.648 a6.255 ± 0.056 a0.00430 ± 0.00022 a0.993
PLW-502823.880 ± 174.132 a2726.678 ± 109.850 a6.293 ± 0.147 a0.00437 ± 0.00014 a0.998
PLW-1002828.462 ± 142.226 a2728.931 ± 122. 832 a6.291 ± 0.024 a0.00436 ± 0.00020 a0.996
Different lowercase letters within the same column indicate significant differences among treatments (p < 0.05).
Table 4. Pearson correlation analysis between soil bacterial alpha diversity indices and environmental factors.
Table 4. Pearson correlation analysis between soil bacterial alpha diversity indices and environmental factors.
Environmental FactorSTSWCpHSMBCTN
Chao10.425 *0.519 *−0.452 *0.586 *0.496 *
Ace0.2260.395 *−0.0260.543 *0.461 *
Shannon0.1860.223−0.443 *0.628 *0.589 *
Simpson0.1080.114−0.0350.2770.225
Abbreviations: ST, soil temperature; SWC, soil water content; TN, total nitrogen; SMBC, soil microbial biomass carbon. An asterisk (*) indicates a significant correlation at p < 0.05.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wu, S.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, C.; Ren, L.; Wei, Y.; Guo, Y.; Guo, M. Long-Term Straw Return Strategies Shape Soil Properties and Bacterial Community Structure in a Mollisol: A Nine-Year Field Trial. Agriculture 2025, 15, 1936. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15181936

AMA Style

Wu S, Zhao J, Zhang C, Ren L, Wei Y, Guo Y, Guo M. Long-Term Straw Return Strategies Shape Soil Properties and Bacterial Community Structure in a Mollisol: A Nine-Year Field Trial. Agriculture. 2025; 15(18):1936. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15181936

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wu, Siyang, Jiale Zhao, Chengliang Zhang, Lixing Ren, Yanpeng Wei, Yingjie Guo, and Mingzhuo Guo. 2025. "Long-Term Straw Return Strategies Shape Soil Properties and Bacterial Community Structure in a Mollisol: A Nine-Year Field Trial" Agriculture 15, no. 18: 1936. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15181936

APA Style

Wu, S., Zhao, J., Zhang, C., Ren, L., Wei, Y., Guo, Y., & Guo, M. (2025). Long-Term Straw Return Strategies Shape Soil Properties and Bacterial Community Structure in a Mollisol: A Nine-Year Field Trial. Agriculture, 15(18), 1936. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15181936

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop