Next Article in Journal
Polyphenolic and Fruit Colorimetric Analysis of Hungarian Sour Cherry Genebank Accessions
Previous Article in Journal
MobileNet-CA-YOLO: An Improved YOLOv7 Based on the MobileNetV3 and Attention Mechanism for Rice Pests and Diseases Detection
Previous Article in Special Issue
Genetic Diversity and Population Structure Analysis to Construct a Core Collection from Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) Germplasm through SSR Markers
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Molecular Characterization and Haplotype Analysis of Low Phytic Acid-1 (lpa1) Gene Governing Accumulation of Kernel Phytic Acid in Subtropically-Adapted Maize

1
Division of Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India
2
AMITY Institute of Biotechnology, AMITY University, Noida 201313, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agriculture 2023, 13(7), 1286; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13071286
Submission received: 6 June 2023 / Revised: 20 June 2023 / Accepted: 21 June 2023 / Published: 22 June 2023

Abstract

:
Maize is an important food, feed, fodder and industrial crop in addition to being a valuable source of micronutrients. Phytic acid (PA), an anti-nutritional factor in maize, makes crucial minerals inaccessible to monogastric animals. The low phytic acid-1 (lpa1) gene located on chromosome-1S is 7292 bp long with 11 exons, and the recessive lpa1-1 allele reduces the accumulation of PA thereby enhances the bioavailability of essential minerals in maize kernels. Here, we characterized the full-length Lpa1 gene sequence in three mutants (lpa1-1) and seven wild-type (Lpa1) maize inbreds. Sequence analysis revealed 607 polymorphic sites across Lpa1 sequences, indicating wide variability for Lpa1 among the inbreds. Further, SNP from “C” to “T” differentiated wild-type and mutant-type alleles at 1432 amino acid position. Gene-based diversity among 48 diverse maize inbreds using 15 InDel markers revealed the formation of 42 distinct haplotypes; six of which (Hap6, Hap16, Hap17, Hap19 Hap27 and Hap31) were shared by more than one genotype. The number of exons in Lpa1 ranged from 11–19 among maize genotypes and 6–14 among 26 orthologues. Major functional motifs of Lpa1 detected were ATP-binding Cassette (ABC) transporter trans-membrane region and ABC transporter. Phylogenetic tree using nucleotide and protein sequences revealed a closer relationship of maize Lpa1 sequences with Sorghum bicolor, Panicum hallii, Setaria italica and S. viridis. This study offered newer insights into the understanding of the genetic diversity of the Lpa1 gene in maize and related crop-species, and information generated here would further help in exploiting the lpa1 mutant for the enhancement of nutritional value in maize kernels.

1. Introduction

More than two billion people worldwide suffer from micronutrient deficiencies especially iron and zinc [1]. Iron is necessary for humans to maintain healthy red blood cells, muscles, and fundamental biological processes [2,3]. While, zinc plays a crucial part in the transcriptional control of the cellular metabolic network and is necessary for homeostasis, connective tissue development, growth, and maintenance, RNA and DNA synthesis, cell activation, and cell division [4]. Inadequate consumption of zinc causes depression and psychosis, stunted growth and development, and immune system damage [5]. Iron inadequacy impairs brain function, growth, reproductive function, and quality of work life, and is mainly responsible for causing anemia [6]. Children under the age of five and pregnant or nursing women have been found to be more vulnerable to deficiencies mainly caused by iron and zinc in underdeveloped nations [7,8]. The alleviation of micronutrient deficiencies is achieved by a variety of approaches, such as food fortification, supplementation and dietary diversification, but the most effective, affordable, and sustainable way is crop biofortification where crop cultivars improved with nutrition are developed through breeding approaches [9,10].
Phytic acid (PA) (myo-inositol-1,2,3,4,5,6-hexakisphospate) is the principal form of phosphorus (P) storage in seeds [11,12]. During seed maturation, it accumulates as phytate salts, chelating various minerals thereby reducing their bioavailability in monogastric animals [13]. Only ruminants can break down PA among animals that consume seeds due to the presence of phytase producing bacteria in their digestive tracts [12,13]. The PA is mostly deposited in the embryo and scutellum of maize [14]. Monogastric species, including humans, have nearly minimal phytase activity in their digestive tracts; therefore only 10% of the phytate in their meal is broken down with the other 90% being excreted [13,15,16]. Hence, the farmers rearing pigs, poultry, fish, and other monogastric animals must supply supplemental feed containing mineral cations and phosphorus [13]. Moreover, a significant environmental issue known as groundwater eutrophication is caused by the high quantity of excreted P produced from PA [17]. Furthermore, in the digestive system, PA interacts with basic amino acids, seed proteins, and enzymes to produce complexes that may decrease the availability of amino acids, digestibility of proteins, and activity of digestive enzymes [18,19,20]. However, dietary PA may potentially have health-promoting effects as an antioxidant, anti-cancer agent, or inhibitor of kidney stone development [21].
Maize is one of the most potential staple foods that can improve global food security, as it can be grown in a range of habitats [22]. The livelihood of millions of people worldwide depends on maize due to its critical role in food production, animal feed, and a wide range of industrial applications [23,24]. Nevertheless, maize grains contain more PA than other cereal grains, which considerably lowers the bioavailability of iron and zinc [25,26]. The reduction of PA in maize grains helps in enhancing the bioavailability of iron and zinc in the human gut [12]. Of the various mutants available in maize, low phytic acid-1 (lpa1) possesses great promise for the development of low PA maize hybrids [27]. Lpa1 affects the capacity of multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP) transporters to transport and store PA into the vacuole [13]. The mutant lpa1 allele in homozygous conditions exhibits a 66% reduction in PA content, thereby enhances the bioavailability of positively charged minerals like iron and zinc [27,28,29,30]. So far, various studies used temperate germplasm for analysis of the lpa1 gene [12]. However, the extent of variability in the Lpa1 gene among the subtropical germplasm is yet to be analyzed. The current work will be useful in understanding the phylogenetic and evolutionary relationship among maize and its orthologues for lpa1-1; gene-based InDel markers developed can be used to characterize the unknown genotypes for lpa1 gene; and also supports lpa1-based breeding initiatives in maize. Thus, the present study was undertaken to (i) sequence characterize the Lpa1 gene in a set of mutants and subtropically-adapted wild-type maize inbreds; (ii) discover haplotypes of Lpa1 gene across diverse subtropical maize inbreds using gene-based InDel markers; and (iii) compare the Lpa1 gene of maize with its orthologues at nucleotide and protein levels.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Genetic Materials

Three low phytic acid mutant inbreds (PMI-LP1-124, A619 lpa1-1, and A632 lpa1-1) and seven elite wild-type maize genotypes (PMI-PV5, PMI-PV6, PMI-PV7, PMI-PV8, PMI-Q1, PMI-Q2, and PMI-Q3) were chosen for characterization of the full-length Lpa1 gene at nucleotide and protein levels (Table 1). The Lpa1 represents the wild-type allele and lpa1-1 represents the mutant-type allele throughout the text. The wild-type inbreds had a high level of PA and low inorganic phosphorus, whereas the mutant-type genotypes have low phytic acid and high inorganic phosphorus (iP) [27,30]. A diverse panel of 48 genotypes (42 wild-type and six mutant-type inbreds) was used for evaluating the gene-based diversity, and haplotype study (Table S1).

2.2. Genomic DNA Isolation, PCR Amplification and Sequencing of Lpa1

The sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) extraction procedure [31] was followed to extract the genomic DNA from the seeds of selected inbreds. The 7292 bp region from the B73 reference genome of the Lpa1 gene sequence (Gene ID: Zm00001eb003490) from the Zm-B73-REFERENCE-NAM-5.0 version available in Maize Genetics and Genomics Database (maizeGDB), was retrieved. Primer3web v4.1.0 online tool was used to design 13 overlapping primer pairs and were synthesized from Sigma Aldrich Chemical Pvt. Ltd., Bengaluru, India (Table S2). These primers covered the full-length Lpa1 gene sequence and the product size ranged from 300 to 800 bp. The amplified products were synthesized using a thermal cycler in a 50 µL reaction containing a DNA template, OnePCRTM Mix (GeneDireX Ready to use PCR master mix), and 0.5 µM of each forward and reverse primer. The PCR protocol was carried out with the following PCR conditions using a BIO-RAD model T100TM thermal cycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., Gurugram, India): (i) initial denaturation for five minutes at 95 °C; (ii) 35 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C, annealing at 55–60 °C (depending on Tm of primer pair), and primer extension at 72 °C for 45 s each step; and (iii) final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. Each PCR reaction was carried out twice and the integrity of each amplicon was checked on a 2.0% Seakem LE agarose gel using 5 µL volume, and the remaining volume was processed for sequencing by Bionivid Technology Private Limited, Bengaluru, India.

2.3. Alignment of Sequences and Functional Analysis of Lpa1 Gene

To analyse the raw sequence data, the sequencing results of each fragment were compared to the B73 reference sequence. By arranging 13 overlapping fragments encompassing the entire gene, the complete gene sequence for each genotype was obtained using the Bio-Edit software version 7.0.5.3 [32]. The complete gene sequences of all 10 genotypes and the B73 reference sequence were aligned in MEGA v11(Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 11) software using ClustalW and MUSCLE algorithm for identification of SNPs and InDel variants among wild-type and mutant inbreds [33]. In order to count the SNPs, InDels, polymorphic sites, total mutations, haplotypes, haplotype gene diversity, nucleotide diversity, and InDel events, the MEGA alignment file was analysed using DnaSP6 v6.12.03 programme.

2.4. Gene-Based Diversity Analysis of Lpa1 among the Diverse Maize Genotypes

Based on the complete Lpa1 gene sequence among 10 genotypes (seven wild and three mutant-types) and polymorphic regions, 15 gene-based InDel markers covering the full length of Lpa1 were designed (Figure 1; Table S3). The PCR reactions for the InDel markers were carried out in a BIO-RAD T100TM thermal cycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc.), all the PCR reactions were performed under the following conditions: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min, 35 cycles of primer annealing at 58–63 °C (depending upon Tm) for 45 s, primer extension at 72 °C for 1 min, and final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. The diverse panel of 48 maize inbreds was genotyped using all 15 InDel markers. On the basis of InDel size, PCR products were run through 4% metaphor agarose and 8% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE). DARwin v6.0 was used to analyze the marker data obtained through the gel profiles, established genetic dissimilarity based on Jaccard’s coefficient, and deduced the dendrogram using the Neighbour-joining method [34]. Gene diversity, total allele count, major allele frequency, heterozygosity and the polymorphism information content (PIC) were analysed using PowerMarker v3 [35]. Further, the Newick output file from DARwin software was used to construct a dendrogram through an online server called iTOL (Interactive Tree of Life) [36].

2.5. Retrieval of Gene and Protein Sequences of Lpa1 Orthologues

On the basis of Lpa1 sequence similarity (>50%), 26 orthologues were selected for phylogenetic analysis. Nucleotide and protein sequences were retrieved for different accessions of orthologue species. Lpa1-wild-Zm00001eb003490 of B73 reference of Zea mays was used to compare 10 maize Lpa1 sequences from the current study, along with 26 orthologues, viz. Aegilops tauschii (1), Ananas comosus (1), Asparagus officinalis (1), Brachypodium distachyon (1), Dioscorea rotundata (1), Eragrostis curvula (1), E. tef (1), Hordeum vulgare (1), Leersia perrieri (1), Musa acuminata (2), Oryza barthii (1), O. brachyantha (1), O. sativa Japonica Group (1), O. sativa Indica Group (1), O. rufipogon (1), O.nivara (1), Panicum hallii HAL2 (1), Secale cereal (1), Setaria viridis (1), S. italica(1), Sorghum bicolor (1), Triticum aestivum (1), T. dicoccoides (1), T. turgidum (1), T. urartu (1). These were acquired using the BLASTp search tool using an expectation value (e-value) of ≤1e−5 from the publicly accessible Ensembl Plants database [37] (Table 2).

2.6. Gene Prediction and Phylogenetic Tree

The maize Lpa1 gene sequences of 10 inbreds undertaken in the study along with B73 reference sequence and 26 orthologue accessions were subjected to Hidden Markov Model (HMM)-based gene prediction tool, called FGENESH to examine the 5′-UTR, transcription start site, intron-exon boundaries, and poly-A tail [38]. Nucleotide and protein sequences of 37 Lpa1 accessions including 10 maize sequences from the current study (seven Lpa1-wild and three lpa1-1-mutant), Lpa1 reference sequence and 26 orthologue accessions of related crop species (Table 2) were taken for phylogenetic analysis using the CLUSTALW tool in MEGA v11 with 10,000 bootstraps.

2.7. Structural Analysis and Physicochemical Properties of LPA1 Protein

The LPA1 protein sequence was retrieved from UniProt with the protein ID: A7KVC2. The protein sequences were aligned using the MEGA v11 tool and analyzed for the presence of point mutations, and conserved regions. The prediction of transition-transversion bias, amino acid composition, and Tajima’s Neutrality test were done using the MEGA v11. The chemical and physical properties of proteins, such as the composition of amino acids, molecular weight, isoelectric point (pI), negatively and positively charged amino acids, aliphatic index, instability index and grand average of hydropathicity (GRAVY), were searched using ProtParam online tool (at ExPASy). Self-Optimized Prediction Method from Alignment (SOPMA) was used to study the secondary structure of the LPA1 protein. The functional motifs and domains among the maize and its orthologues protein sequences were identified with the help of the MOTIF search tool (https://www.genome.jp/tools/motif/; accessed on 26 March 2023).

2.8. Homology Modeling of LPA1 Protein

SWISS-MODEL was used to generate LPA1 protein models based on homology at various levels of complexity [39]. The best selected homology model was studied with regard to several criteria, including GMQE score >0.5, identity score >50%, and QMEAN score >0.7. The chosen model’s PDB file was used for the evaluation of the Ramachandran Plot using the Swiss model. Protein-ligand binding sites were also predicted through SWISS-MODEL.

3. Results

3.1. Sequence Characterization of Lpa1 Gene among Selected Maize Inbreds

The overlapping amplicons covering the full-length of the Lpa1 gene in 10 maize genotypes were sequenced and consecutive sequences were aligned with B73 reference to get a complete gene sequence for each genotype. The Lpa1 gene sequence comparison among the sequenced genotypes revealed the existence of 607 SNPs and 335 InDels with an average InDel length of 1.55 bp and diversity k(i) of 47.418%. The selected 11 maize sequences including B73 reference showed 0.920 sequence conservation (C). A total of 32 conserved regions with p-values between 0.0000 and 0.0417 were also found. The phylogenetic tree of 11 maize inbreds including the B73 reference were divided into two clusters, -A and -B, with a sum of branch length (SBL) of 0.1018. The genotypes were correlated together with 10,000 bootstraps and the percentage of replicate trees varied from 35 to 99% (Figure 2A). The Tajima-Nei method produced an evolutionary distance value between 0.00606 and 0.03546. In total, 11 haplotypes were identified among the sequenced maize genotypes with a gene diversity score of 1.00. The observed value for nucleotide diversity (Pi) was 0.01838, Tajima’s D value was −1.52327, and theta (per site) from Eta was 0.02679.
Further, the non-synonymous (Ka)/synonymous (Ks) nucleotide diversity ratio was calculated to determine the significance of the observed polymorphisms at the nucleotide sequences. PMI-PV-6 (Lpa1-wild-2) had the lowest Ka/Ks ratio among the 10 inbreds that were selected, followed by PMI-Q3 (Lpa1-wild-7) and PMI-PV5 (Lpa1-wild-1), indicating that they had the fewest non-synonymous mutations and the least amount of evolutionary divergence. The PMI-Q1 (Lpa1-wild-5) possessed the largest Ka/Ks ratio; therefore, inferred to possess more significant diversity, which suggested that a particular allele was under selective pressure. The range of Ka/Ks ratio in the case of wild and mutant-type genotypes varied from 0.670 to 1.604 and 0.698 to 0.792, respectively (Table S4).

3.2. Characterization of LPA1 Protein among Selected Maize Inbreds

The alignment of protein sequences of wild-type (Lpa1) and mutant-type (lpa1-1) genotypes showed 841 variables among the maize inbreds. The neighbor-joining method was used to determine the evolutionary relationship of the LPA1 protein among the mutant and wild type genotypes. The measured SBL was 1.138 (Figure 2B). Two main clusters (-P and -Q) were identified based on phylogenetic analysis; each cluster contained four and seven inbreds, respectively. Cluster-P grouped two mutant genotypes (A619 lpa1-1 and A632 lpa1-1) and two wild-type maize genotypes (PMI-PV7 and PMI-PV8). Cluster-Q was split into two sub-clusters, first sub-cluster possessed two wild-type maize inbreds (PMI-Q1 and PMI-PV5) and one mutant-type inbred (PMI-LP1-124), and the second sub-cluster possessed all the wild-type genotypes (PMI-Q2, PMI-Q3, PMI-PV6) and B73 reference sequence (Protein ID: A7KVC2), respectively (Figure 2B).

3.3. Gene-Based Diversity Analysis among Diverse Maize Inbreds Using InDel Markers

Among 335 identified InDels, 15 InDel sites were exploited to develop markers to study gene-based diversity of Lpa1 considering the GC-content and necessary distance between two consecutive InDels (Table S3). In a panel of 48 diverse-mutant and wild-type maize inbreds, all the 15 InDel markers (lpa1-InDel-1 to lpa1-InDel-15) were polymorphic, producing 1–3 alleles per locus with a total of 38 alleles (Figure S1). The major allele frequency ranged from 0.4583 (lpa1-InDel-10) to 0.8750 (lpa1-InDel-1) with a mean of 0.6639. PIC among the InDel markers ranged from 0.1948 to 0.5423 with an average PIC of 0.3813; 12 markers had PIC of >0.3. The panel of 48 inbreds showed heterozygosity ranging from 0.00 to 0.0417 with an average of 0.0028. Gene diversity varied from 0.219 (lpa1-InDel-1) and 0.612 (lpa1-InDel-5), with a mean of 0.4521 (Table 3). Using InDel-based genotyping of the Lpa1 gene, 42 haplotypes were formed among 48 inbreds. Of these, six haplotypes were shared among the genotypes viz. Hap6 shared by BML7 and BML45; Hap 16 shared by BK9-2 and HKI1378; Hap17 shared by HKI1040-7 and HKI1344; Hap19 shared by PMI-PV2 and PMI-PV12; Hap27 shared by CML385 and CML410; and Hap31 shared by CML473 and CML474 (Figure 3). The InDel markers showed that all the six low phytate maize inbreds with the recessive lpa1-1 allele had different haplotypes (Figure 3).
The average genetic dissimilarity was 0.612, which ranged from 0 to 0.9286. The dendrogram divided 48 maize genotypes into two main clusters viz., -R and -S. The 19 inbreds that made cluster-R were further divided into two sub-clusters, with R1 having six mutants and one wild-type genotype with seven haplotypes, and R2 having 12 wild-type genotypes with 10 haplotypes. The 29 maize inbreds that produced cluster-S were divided into three sub-clusters viz., -S1 having four wild-type inbreds with three haplotypes; -S2 having four wild-type genotypes with four haplotypes, and -S3 having 21 wild genotypes with 18 haplotypes (Figure 4).

3.4. Structure of Lpa1 Gene in Maize and Its Orthologues

The TSS of Lpa1 was located at 53 to 2620 bp upstream in maize genotypes, whereas in orthologues, it was found at 36 to 4774 bp upstream of their respective start site. In maize accessions, the gene coding sequence ranged from 1896 to 4530 bp, whereas in orthologues, it ranged from 387 to 5226 bp. In maize, the number of exons ranged from 11 to 19, while for orthologues, it ranged from 6 to 14 (Table S5). The length of exon ranged in maize accessions from 21 to 2314 bp, and in the sequences of the orthologues, it varied from 6 to 2076 bp. The analysis showed that the length of introns across maize genotypes varied from 36 to 892 bp, whereas in the case of orthologues, it ranged from 55 to 2653 bp. The location of poly-A site among maize inbreds was found from 6726 to 7307 bp downstream of start, the same in orthologues was from 4972 to 13,813 bp.
A total of 37 accessions from 16 different crops were selected to study the evolutionary relationship of the Lpa1 gene (Table 2). According to the phylogenetic analysis, the evolutionary tree contained branches having an average branch length of 3.85. In the bootstrap test (10,000 replications), the percentage of duplicate trees with the relevant taxa clustered together ranged from 51 to 100%. The phylogenetic tree, based on nucleotide sequence of 37 accessions, had two major clusters viz., -C and -D. The cluster-C was sub-divided into two sub-clusters viz., -C1 and -C2. The sub-cluster-C1 had 15 orthologues viz. T. urartu (TuG1812G0500005238.01), T. aestivum (TraesCS5A02G512500), T. turgidum (TRITD5Av1G244640), T. dicoccoides (TRIDC4BG057910), A. tauschii (AET4Gv20803900), S. cereale (SECCE5Rv1G0369730), H. vulgare (HORVU.MOREX.r3.4HG0412040), B. distachyon (BRADI_1g75590v3), O. brachyantha (OB03G13350), L. perrieri (LPERR03G03070), O. sativa var. indica (ABCC13 BGIOSGA011835), O. barthii (OBART03G03330), O. sativa var. japonica (OsABCC13), O. rufipogon (ORUFI03G03050) and O. nivara (ONIVA03G03060). All the 10 maize genotypes including three lpa1-1 maize mutants (A619 lpa1-1, A632 lpa1-1 and PMI-LP1-124) and B73 reference sequence (Gene ID: Zm00001eb003490) were grouped under sub-cluster-C2. Further, maize genotypes showed a strong association with six orthologues viz. S. bicolor (SORBI_3001G508200), P. hallii (GQ55_9G618800), S. italica (SETIT_033885mg), S. viridis (SEVIR_9G548400v2), E. tef (Et_s2678-1.30-1.path1) and E. curvula (EJB05_08061) in the sub-cluster- C2 (Figure 5). The cluster-D possessed five orthologue accessions viz. D. rotundata (DRNTG_05198), A. officinalis (A4U43_C10F18740), A. comosus (Aco010163), M. acuminata (Ma08_g12530), and M. acuminata (Ma11_g02290) (Figure 5).

3.5. Structure of LPA1 Protein in Maize and Its Orthologues

The phylogenetic tree between the 11 maize genotypes and its 26 orthologues was divided into two major clusters called cluster-M and -N; with cluster-M was further divided into sub-clusters -M1, -M2, -M3 -M4 and M5 (Figure S2). All the maize protein sequences including B73 reference along with four orthologues viz. S. bicolor (A0A1Z5SBX3), P. hallii HAL2 (A0A2T7CHT9), S. viridis (A0A4U6TCN8) and S. italica (K4A4T1) were grouped in sub-cluster-M1 (Figure S2). The M2 sub-cluster as a solo cluster possessed E. curvula (TVU48425) orthologue. The sub-cluster-M3 possessed seven orthologues viz. O. brachyantha (J3LJV9), L. perrieri (A0A0D9VPF0), O. barthii (A0A0D3FDN4), O. sativa var. indica (A2XCD4), O. sativa var. japonica (Q10RX7), O. rufipogon (A0A0E0NPI1), and O. nivara (A0A0E0GGM3). The B. distachyon (I1H9W0) also formed as a solo cluster (sub-cluster-M4). The sub-cluster-M5 possessed seven orthologues viz. H. vulgare (A0A287PXI6), S. cereale (SECCE5Rv1G0369730.1), T. urartu (M8AP62), T. dicoccoides (TRIDC4BG057910.7), A. tauschi (M8CWG8), T. aestivum (A0A1D5YDM9), and T. turgidum (TRITD5Av1G244640.2) (Figure S2). On the contrary, another major cluster-N comprised of six orthologues viz. M. acuminata (Ma08_t12530.1), M. acuminata (Ma11_t02290.2), D. rotundata (DRNTG_05198), A. comosus (A0A199URG9), E. tef (Et_s2678-1.30-1.mrna1) and A. officinalis (A0A5P1E459) (Figure S2).

3.6. Homology Modeling of LPA1 Protein

The sequence of LPA1 protein was searched for templates in SWISS-Model in order to find a similar pattern. There were 23,418 templates, in all, it matched the target sequence. A heuristic model was used to reduce this list’s length to 50. A normalised BLOSUM62 substitution matrix was used to calculate the template sequence similarity. The top four templates were used for modeling with Global Model Quality Estimation (GMQE) scores between 0.54 and 0.57, which accounted for the QMEANDisCo Global score of 0.64 ± 0.05 and 0.68 ± 0.05. The sequence identity varied from 35.92 to 36.38% among the top four models. All four models [6uy0.1.A (bovine), 6bhu.1.A (bovine), 5uj9.1.A (bovine) and 5uja.1.A (bovine)] were monomeric states and depicted bovine multidrug resistance protein 1 (MRP1). The QMEAN observed for all four models [6uy0.1.A (bovine), 6bhu.1.A (bovine), 5uj9.1.A (bovine) and 5uja.1.A (bovine)] were −2.86, −3.41, −4.09 and −3.65, respectively. The highest sequence identity was observed in 6uy0.1.A (36.38%). Ramachandran plot depicted that 95.32% of residues lay in favoured regions and only 0.79% were outliers. The MolProbity score was 1.10 and the clash score was 0.90. The protein 6uy0.1.A was a multidrug resistance-associated protein 1 that encoded the ATP binding cassettes and was one of the top comparable templates (Figure S3).

3.7. Domains, Motifs and Features of LPA1 Protein

The 52 domains and features were annotated in the LPA1 protein sequence (A7KVC2), which was associated with 549 variants. The major domains were ABC (ATP-binding Cassette sub-family c), P-loop containing nucleoside triphosphate hydrolase, and AAA-ATPases associated with a variety of cellular activities (Table S6). With the help of the MOTIF search tool, 18 motifs were found in the protein sequence of LPA1 (A7KVC2). The 18 motifs were ABC transporter transmembrane region, ABC transporter, RecF/RecN/SMC N terminal domain, 50S ribosome-binding GTPase, P-loop containing region of AAA domain, AAA ATPase domain, AAA domain, putative AbiEii toxin, Type IV TA system, Helicase HerA, central domain, Dynamin family, Methylmalonyl Co-A mutase-associated GTPase MeaB, Type II/IV secretion system protein, Conserved hypothetical ATP binding protein, AAA domain, FtsK/SpoIIIE family, Type IV secretion-system coupling protein DNA-binding domain and Double-GTPase 2. In the case of wild-type genotypes, the LPA1 protein motifs varied from 15 to 20, whereas in case of mutant-type, it varied from 13 to 20 motifs. The least number of motifs were found in PMI-LP1-124 (13 motifs), PMI-PV7 (15 motifs) and PMI-Q1 (16 motifs) among maize protein sequences. The maximum number of motifs (20 motifs) were found in PMI-PV-5, PMI-PV-6 and A632 lpa1-1 among maize protein sequences. The additional motifs were NB-ARC domain (PMI-PV5, PMI-PV6 and PMI-Q1, PMI-Q3 and A632 lpa1-1), Peptidase family S49 N-terminal (PMI-PV5), DEAD/DEAH box helicase (PMI-PV6 and PMI-Q3), alpha/beta hydrolase fold (PMI-PV7) and citrate transporter (A632 lpa1-1).
All the orthologue protein sequences were predicted with major motifs, which were present in the reference sequence of LPA1-1 viz. ABC transporter transmembrane region, ABC transporter, AAA domain, putative AbiEii toxin, Type IV TA system, AAA domain, Helicase HerA, central domain, AAA ATPase domain, Methylmalonyl Co-A mutase-associated GTPase MeaB, FtsK/SpoIIIE family, Double-GTPase 2, conserved hypothetical ATP binding protein. Motifs other than reference sequences were also present in some orthologue protein sequences. NB-ARC domain was present in some maize genotypes as well as in orthologues viz., E. curvula (TVU48425), H. vulgare (A0A287PXI6), M. acuminata (Ma08_t12530.1), T. turgidum (TRITD5Av1G244640.2), E. tef (Et_s2678-1.30-1.mrna1). Zeta toxin motifs were present in L. perrieri (A0A0D9VPF0), O. brachyantha (J3LJV9), Coilin N-terminus in A. comosus (A0A199URG9), M. acuminata (Ma08_t12530.1), M. acuminata (Ma11_t02290.2), Magnesium chelatase, subunit ChlI in A. officinalis (A0A5P1E459), E. curvula (TVU48425), M. acuminata (Ma11_t02290.2), E. tef (Et_s2678-1.30-1.mrna1), CobW/HypB/UreG, nucleotide-binding domain in O. barthii (A0A0D3FDN4), DNA mimic ocr in O. barthii (A0A0D3FDN4), O. sativa Japonica Group (Q10RX7), O. sativa Indica Group (A2XCD4), O. nivara (A0A0E0GGM3), DEAD/DEAH box helicase in D. rotundata (DRNTG_05198.1), S. bicolor (A0A1Z5SBX3), and Pre-mRNA-splicing factor PRP9 N-terminus in M. acuminata (Ma08_t12530.1).

3.8. Physicochemical Properties of LPA1 Protein in Maize and Selected Orthologues

In maize, 1510 amino acids long LPA1 (A7KVC2) protein had a coding sequence of 4530 bp. The total number of negatively charged residues (Asp + Glu) in reference sequence was 145, whereas the total number of positively charged residues (Arg + Lys) was 155. Leucine was the predominant amino acid that ranged from 10.8 to 13.9% among selected maize protein sequences; followed by the alanine (5.2 to 10.8%). The highest amount of amino acid in selected orthologues was leucine (11.2 to 12.7%), followed by alanine which ranged from 7.2 to 10.8%. However, in the case of T. turgidum and T. urartu, serine was the second highest amino acid at 8.7% and 8.5%, respectively). At 280 nm, the measured extinction coefficients in water were 214,320 M−1cm−1 assuming that all pairs of cysteine residues form cystines and 212,570 M−1cm−1 assuming that all pairs of cysteine residues were reduced. GRAVY and the aliphatic index were 0.19 and 107.19, respectively, indicating that the compound was polar (Table 4). The aliphatic index of all maize protein sequences ranged from 96.74 to 109. High aliphatic index values demonstrated thermostable solubility nature. The GRAVY value of the reference protein sequence reflects its polar nature; negative values reflect the non-polar nature of the peptide, whereas positive value reflects its polar nature. All selected maize protein sequences were polar in nature except PMI-PV5, PMI-PV7, PMI-LP1-124 and A619 lpa1-1. The reference LPA1 protein was computed as unstable with an instability index of 46.28. The PMI-Q3 had the highest instability index of 50.07 among selected maize genotypes. The secondary structure of the LPA1-1 protein of the reference sequence had 797 alpha helices, 216 extended strands, 84 beta turns and 413 random coils (Figure S3). In the case of orthologues, all the protein sequences were polar in nature due to positive GRAVY value except O. brachyantha and E. tef. All the selected maize LPA1 protein sequences and their orthologues were unstable, as they all had an instability index of more than 40 (Table 4). The aliphatic index varied from 102.50 to 107.40 among selected orthologue LPA1 protein sequences. All orthologues were highly thermostable and hydrophobic in nature.

4. Discussion

Large populations worldwide suffer from micronutrient malnutrition, inflicting severe socio-economic losses which creates a global concern [40]. The deficiency of iron and zinc can be effectively addressed by developing low PA maize cultivars possessing mutant lpa1-1 allele [41,42]. The Lpa1 mutation was first reported by Dr. Victor Raboy from USDA, with the help of chemical mutagenesis using ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) [43]. In the lpa1-1 mutant, PA is not deposited within the protein-storage vacuoles leading to the feedback inhibition of the synthesis of PA [44]. In the present investigation, we characterized the Lpa1 sequence in diverse maize inbreds to examine the allelic variations, gene-based diversity, and phylogenetic relationship of the Lpa1 gene in maize and its orthologues, for enhancing opportunities of lowering PA, and hence improving the nutritional seed quality in cereal-based crops.

4.1. Allelic Variations in Lpa1 Gene in Maize Genotypes

The development of desirable crop cultivars depends on utilizing suitable allelic variants of a specific trait [45,46]. The SNP based on the C (wild) to T (mutant) transition at amino acid position 1432 of the 10th exon in the Lpa1 gene [44], two dominant markers were developed by Abhijith et al. [30]. These markers were later utilized in a molecular breeding programme to select the genotypes with low phytic acid in maize [47]. Based on this causal polymorphic SNP (C to T), seven wild-type and three mutant-type inbreds were selected for full-length Lpa1 gene sequence characterization in the present study. The complete gene sequence analysis revealed adequate variation in both wild-type (Lpa1) and mutant (lpa1-1) alleles across diverse maize inbreds. The nucleotide diversity of wild-type inbreds was higher than that of mutants, due to their diverse ancestors [48,49]. High nucleotide diversity was confirmed by the Tajima’s neutrality (D) test value, which was shown to be significant in a negative direction and indicated that the pressure on selection was caused by reduced average heterozygosity across the genotypes [50,51]. The clustering pattern of nucleotide sequences indicated that different variations exist between mutant- and wild-type sequences of the Lpa1 gene. The reference sequence showed more similarity with mutants viz., PMI-LP1-124 and A632 lpa1-1. The evolutionary distance is regarded to be a powerful predictor of the neutral mode of evolution based on synonymous (Ks) and nonsynonymous (Ka) sites [52]. The direction and strength of natural selection operating on protein-coding genes is determined from the Ka/Ks ratio and a ratio of <1 denotes stabilizing selection [53]. All of the sequenced maize genotypes in the present study had a Ka/Ks ratio of <1, with the exception of lpa1-wild-5 (PMI-Q1).
Gene-based markers used in genetic diversity analysis provide opportunity to evaluate genetic relatedness and locus conservation within genes with greater efficiency [52]. In comparison to Hossain et al. [54] (1.81 alleles/loci), Chhabra et al. [49] (2.00 alleles/loci) and Katral et al. [52] (2.27 alleles/loci), the average number of alleles per locus detected in the present investigation was found to be higher (2.53 alleles/loci). The present research reported lower mean heterozygosity, which showed that most of the loci were homozygous and the alleles were stable [52]. Of the 48 genotypes examined in the study formed 42 haplotypes. Chhabra et al. [49] identified 44 haplotypes, Katral et al. [52] identified 41 haplotypes and Chhabra et al. [55] identified 47 haplotypes of 48 maize genotypes based on su1, Zmfatb and sh2 gene-based markers, respectively and Shin et al. [56] identified 14 haplotypes of 15 sweet corn accessions using SNP based markers. Sequencing technologies has made it simpler to generate haplotype information, which aids in determining ancestry and demographic history [57]. The InDel markers discovered in this study offer a great promise to accurately and economically identify haplotypes in unknown germplasm. The InDel-based markers offer several advantages over polymorphic markers such as SNP, which includes excellent precision and high stability that help in resolving any ambiguity that may develop during genetic study [58]. These InDel markers from the current study can be used in marker-assisted selection (MAS) if polymorphic between recipient and donor parents.
There were 11 different haplotypes found when the Lpa1 gene was sequence characterized in distinct mutant and wild genotypes. Further, 11 maize genotypes were shown to be distinct from one another, and the cluster analysis validated this finding. S. bicolor, S. italica, S. viridis and P. hallii showed very close association with Lpa1 reference sequence based on nucleotide phylogenetic tree. P. hallii is closely linked to plants in the Andropogoneae family, including sorghum and maize [59]. Around 27 million years ago, Setaria sp. split off from Sorghum and Zea mays, and the same was seen in the new sub-group [49]. The MRP5 gene of Arabidopsis thaliana and MRP4 gene of maize coded by Lpa1 were closely related [60].

4.2. Variation in LPA1 Protein among Maize Genotypes

The mutant lpa1-1 was due to ethyl methanesulfonate, carried an alanine (wild-type) to valine (mutant-type) point mutation from C (wild) to T (mutant) SNP at 1432 amino acid position in LPA1 protein [43,44]. The amino acid (alanine) at this position is conserved in MRP protein and located in the second ATP-binding domain of wild-type genotypes, whereas mutant genotypes possessed truncated MRP protein with valine at 1432 position with other amino acids unchanged [44]. The maize lpa1-1 mutant lacks the MRP-ABC transporter that mainly expresses in embryos as well as in immature endosperm, germinating seed, and vegetative tissues [44]. The compartmentalization and transfer of PA is affected by the ABC transporter. It plays a role in the elimination of PA from the cytosol or the trafficking of vesicles, either directly or indirectly. The reference protein sequence showed strong a correlation with the wild-type protein sequence (PMI-PV6) in the protein-based phylogenetic tree. In phylogenetic analysis, all three mutant protein sequences (PMI-LP1-124, A619 lpa1-1, and A632 lpa1-1) formed a sub-group. One wild-type protein sequence (PMI-PV5) also belonged to this sub-group and showed a strong relationship with the A632 lpa1-1 protein sequence. The protein sequences from orthologues like S. bicolor, P. hallii, S. viridis, and S. italica indicated a close connection with maize protein sequences. The physico-chemical characteristics of the LPA1 protein in maize and its orthologues showed that D. rotundata amino acid residues and molecular weight were the highest when compared to those of other orthologues. This is because it has longer coding sequences and more exons [61]. Protein thermostability is indicated by the aliphatic index; the greater the index, the higher the thermostability [62]. All the maize sequences and selected orthologue sequences had a more aliphatic index, it suggested that all selected maize and orthologue proteins were more thermostable and could withstand greater temperatures [61,62]. Positive numbers on the GRAVY scale denote peptide hydrophobicity, whereas negative values show a protein hydrophilic nature [52]. Every protein in the current study had a GRAVY score between −0.112 and 0.229, indicating that it is hydrophobic in nature and they have protection from the water except PMI-PV5 (−0.006), PMI-PV7 (−0.02), PMI-LP1-124 (−0.024), A619 lpa1-1 (−0.112), O. brachyantha (−0.015) and E. tef (−0.005). The development of three-dimensional models enables a better comprehension of the structural variations of the proteins because the general structure of these enzymes appears to be preserved [63]. In order to fully understand the structural variations between the wild-type (Reference sequence, Protein ID: A7KVC2) and mutant-type (A632 lpa1-1) of maize protein sequence, homology modeling of the LPA1 protein was performed. The template of 8f4b.1.A showed more sequence identity with mutant-type (A632 lpa1-1) protein (Figure 6), whereas template 6uy0.1.A revealed more sequence identity with the reference sequence (Protein ID: A7KVC2). It was found in the second ATP-binding domain of MRP proteins. It was highly likely that this amino acid mutation caused the phenotype of the lpa1-1 allele [44]. Most of the selected orthologues and maize protein sequences had higher isoelectric points (pI: >7), indicating that they were likely to precipitate in simple buffers and exhibit highly conserved activities [49].

5. Conclusions

The present study showed that the link between several orthologues and their development from a common ancestor can be better understood through phylogenetic analysis. It was established that the phylogenetic tree derived from nucleotide and protein sequence data was reliable for cluster formation. Thus, the current study demonstrated the existence of allelic variation in the Lpa1-1 gene in maize, with as many as 42 haplotypes among the diverse panel of 48 inbreds. The gene-based InDel markers developed in the present study can be used to characterize unknown genotypes for the Lpa1 gene. The study also revealed two major domains viz., ABC transporter transmembrane region and ABC transporter in LPA1 protein. All the chosen accessions of maize and other monocots possessed the conserved functional domain. The current study also provided information on the LPA protein in maize and its orthologues and also their physicochemical features. Exon and intron length variation in the Lpa1 gene revealed relationships in the evolution of maize and its orthologues. Phylogenetic study based on nucleotide as well as protein, maize Lpa1 sequence is more related to S. bicolor, P. hallii, S. virdis and S. italica than other selected poaceae family orthologues. The information generated here will be useful in determining the degree of genetic variation and accelerating the lpa1-based breeding programme in maize. This is the first report on a thorough investigation of the Lpa1 gene and its protein in maize and related orthologues.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/agriculture13071286/s1, Figure S1: Representative gel image of PCR profile of marker lpa1-InDel-14F/R; Figure S2: Protein based phylogenetic tree of maize and its orthologues (wild-type maize genotypes indicated with green dot labels whereas red dot represented the mutant-type genotypes of maize, and orthologues represented by purple dots); Figure S3: Homology based LPA1 protein (protein ID: A7KVC2), (a) alignment with 6uy0.1.A (Bovine) template by Swiss Model; (b) Local quality estimation (c) Ramachandran plot using Swiss Model (d) Secondary structure by SOPMA (e) amino acid compositions by predict protein tool; Table S1: Information on the 48 maize inbreds utilised in an InDel-based gene diversity analysis (WT: wild-type; MT: mutant-type); Table S2: Details of overlapping primers developed for sequencing full length Lpa1-1 gene; Table S3: Primer details employed for gene-based diversity in Lpa1-1 gene; Table S4: Evolutionary distance and synonymous and non-synonymous scores in comparison with reference Lpa1 (Gene ID: Zm00001eb003490); Table S5: Structural characteristics of the Lpa1-1 gene in maize genotypes and selected group of orthologue accessions; Table S6: Zea mays LPA1 protein (Protein ID: A7KVC2) domains and features.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.M., F.H., K.K.P. and A.K.S.; Methodology, R.C., A.K. and V.R.; Software, A.K., S.R. and G.R.S.; Formal analysis, V.B.; Investigation, V.B.; Resources, F.H., V.M. and A.K.S.; Data curation, R.U.Z. and G.C.; Writing—original draft preparation, V.B. and V.M.; Writing—review and editing, F.H. and A.K.S.; Supervision, V.M., F.H. and K.K.P.; Project administration, F.H., V.M. and A.K.S.; Funding acquisition, F.H., V.M. and A.K.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Financial support from Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) sponsored Consortia Research Platform on “Molecular breeding for improvement of tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses, yield and quality traits in crops-Maize component” (IARI Project Code No.: 12-143C), and ICAR-IARI, New Delhi is thankfully acknowledged.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Huertas, R.; Karpinska, B.; Ngala, S.; Mkandawire, B.; Maling’a, J.; Wajenkeche, E.; Kimani, P.M.; Boesch, C.; Stewart, D.; Hancock, R.D.; et al. Biofortification of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) with iron and zinc: Achievements and challenges. Food Energy Secur. 2023, 12, e406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gupta, H.S.; Hossain, F.; Nepolean, T.; Vignesh, M.; Mallikarjuna, M.G. Understanding genetic and molecular bases of Fe and Zn accumulation towards development of micronutrient-enriched maize. In Nutrient Use Efficiency: From Basics to Advances; Springer: New Delhi, India, 2015; pp. 255–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jaiswal, S.K.; Muthusamy, V.; Hossain, F.; Zunjare, R.U.; Goswami, R.; Chhabra, R.; Chand, G.; Dosad, S.; Bhowmick, R.; Guleria, S.K.; et al. Characterization of maize genotypes using microsatellite markers associated with QTLs for kernel iron and zinc. Indian J. Biotechnol. 2019, 18, 224–234. [Google Scholar]
  4. Pandey, N.; Hossain, F.; Kumar, K.; Vishwakarma, A.K.; Muthusamy, V.; Manjaiah, K.M.; Agrawal, P.K.; Guleria, S.K.; Reddy, S.S.; Thirunavukkarasu, N.; et al. Microsatellite marker-based genetic diversity among quality protein maize (QPM) inbreds differing for kernel iron and zinc. Mol. Plant Breed. 2015, 6, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gronli, O.; Kvamme, J.M.; Friborg, O.; Wynn, R. Zinc deficiency is common in several psychiatric disorders. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e82793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Pixley, K.; Palacios, N.R.; Glahn, R.P. The usefulness of iron bioavailability as a target trait for breeding maize (Zea mays L.) with enhanced nutritional value. Field Crop Res. 2011, 123, 153–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Global Nutrition Report 2022. Available online: https://globalnutritionreport.org (accessed on 30 March 2023).
  8. Roy, C.; Kumar, S.; Ranjan, R.D.; Kumhar, S.R.; Govindan, V. Genomic approaches for improving grain zinc and iron content in wheat. Front. Genet. 2022, 13, 1045955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Mehta, B.K.; Muthusamy, V.; Zunjare, R.U.; Baveja, A.; Chauhan, H.S.; Chhabra, R.; Singh, A.K.; Hossain, F. Biofortifcation of sweet corn hybrids for provitamin-a, lysine and tryptophan using molecular breeding. J. Cereal. Sci. 2020, 96, 103093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hossain, F.; Zunjare, R.U.; Muthusamy, V.; Bhat, J.S.; Mehta, B.K.; Sharma, D.; Talukder, Z.A.; Chhabra, R.; Katral, A.; Dutta, S.; et al. Biofortification of Maize for Nutritional Security. In Biofortification of Staple Crops; Springer: Singapore, 2022; pp. 147–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Raboy, V. myo-Inositol-1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6-hexakisphosphate. Phytochemistry 2003, 64, 1033–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Raboy, V. Low phytic acid crops: Observations based on four decades of research. Plants 2020, 9, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Colombo, F.; Paolo, D.; Cominelli, E.; Sparvoli, F.; Nielsen, E.; Pilu, R. MRP transporters and low phytic acid mutants in major crops: Main pleiotropic effects and future perspectives. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. O’Dell, B.L.; De Boland, A.R.; Koirtyohann, S.R. Distribution of phytate and nutritionally important elements among the morphological components of cereal grains. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1972, 20, 718–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Cromwell, G.L.; Coffey, R.D. Phosphorus: A key essential nutrient, yet a possible major pollutant. Its central role in animal nutrition. In Biotechnology in the Feed Industry; Alltech Tech Publishers: Nicholasville, KY, USA, 1991; pp. 133–145. [Google Scholar]
  16. Puppala, K.R.; Buddhiwant, P.G.; Agawane, S.B.; Kadam, A.S.; Mote, C.S.; Lonkar, V.D.; Khire, J.M.; Dharne, M.S. Performance of Aspergillus niger (NCIM 563) phytase based feed supplement for broiler growth and phosphorus excretion. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2021, 31, 101887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Raboy, V. Approaches and challenges to engineering seed phytate and total phosphorus. Plant Sci. 2009, 177, 281–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Reddy, N.R.; Pierson, M.D.; Sathe, S.K.; Salunkhe, D.K. Nutritional consequences of phytates. In Phytates in Cereals and Legumes; Reddy, N.R., Pierson, M.D., Sathe, S.K., Salunkhe, D.K., Eds.; CRC Press, Inc.: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1989; pp. 81–110. [Google Scholar]
  19. Bohlke, R.A.; Thaler, R.C.; Stein, H.H. Calcium, phosphorus, and amino acid digestibility in low-phytate corn, normal corn, and soybean meal by growing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 2005, 83, 2396–2403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Selle, P.H.; Ravindran, V.; Bryden, W.L.; Scott, T. Influence of dietary phytate and exogenous phytase on amino acid digestibility in poultry: A review. J. Poult. Sci. 2006, 43, 89–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Silva, E.O.; Bracarense, A.P.F. Phytic acid: From antinutritional to multiple protection factor of organic systems. J. Food Sci. 2016, 81, R1357–R1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Erenstein, O.; Jaleta, M.; Sonder, K.; Mottaleb, K.; Prasanna, B.M. Global maize production, consumption and trade: Trends and R&D implications. Food Secur. 2022, 14, 1295–1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Prasanna, B.M.; Palacios-Rojas, N.; Hossain, F.; Muthusamy, V.; Menkir, A.; Dhliwayo, T.; Ndhlela, T.; San Vicente, F.; Nair, S.K.; Vivek, B.S.; et al. Molecular breeding for nutritionally enriched maize: Status and prospects. Front. Genet. 2020, 10, 1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Hossain, F.; Rakshit, S.; Kumar, B.; Amalraj, J.J.; Muthusamy, V.; Prakash, B.; Zunjare, R.U.; Karjagi, C.; Khulbe, R.; Arora, A.; et al. 21 Molecular breeding for increasing nutrition quality in maize: Recent progress. In Molecular Breeding in Wheat, Maize and Sorghum: Strategies for Improving Abiotic Stress Tolerance and Yield; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 2021; p. 360. [Google Scholar]
  25. Schlemmer, U.; Frølich, W.; Prieto, R.M.; Grases, F. Phytate in foods and significance for humans: Food sources, intake, processing, bioavailability, protective role and analysis. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2009, 53, S330–S375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Ragi, S.; Muthusamy, V.; Zunjare, R.U.; Bhatt, V.; Katral, A.; Abhijith, K.P.; Chand, G.; Mishra, S.J.; Sekhar, J.C.; Yadava, D.K.; et al. Genetic variation for grain phytate and molecular characterization of low phytic acid-2 (lpa2) gene-based maize (Zea mays L.) inbreds. Plant Breed. 2022, 141, 212–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ragi, S.; Muthusamy, V.; Zunjare, R.U.; Bhatt, V.; Katral, A.; Abhijith, K.P.; Kasana, R.; Gain, N.; Sekhar, J.C.; Yadava, D.K.; et al. Genetic and molecular characterization of sub-tropically adapted low phytate genotypes for utilization in mineral biofortification of maize (Zea mays L.). Crop Pasture Sci. 2021, 73, 104–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Pilu, R.; Landoni, M.; Cassani, E.; Doria, E.; Nielsen, E. The maize lpa241 mutation causes a remarkable variability of expression and some pleiotropic effects. Crop Sci. 2005, 45, 2096–2105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Badone, F.C.; Amelotti, M.; Cassani, E.; Pilu, R. Study of low phytic acid1-7 (lpa1-7), a new ZmMRP4 mutation in maize. J. Hered. 2012, 103, 598–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Abhijith, K.P.; Muthusamy, V.; Chhabra, R.; Dosad, S.; Bhatt, V.; Chand, G.; Jaiswal, S.K.; Zunjare, R.U.; Vasudev, S.; Yadava, D.K.; et al. Development and validation of breeder-friendly gene-based marker for lpa1-1 and lpa2-1 genes conferring low phytic acid in maize kernel. 3 Biotech 2020, 10, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Dellaporta, S.L.; Wood, J.; Hicks, J.B. Maize DNA miniprep. In Molecular Biology of Plants; Malberg, R., Messing, J., Sussex, I., Eds.; Cold Spring Harbor: New York, NY, USA, 1985; pp. 36–37. [Google Scholar]
  32. Hall, T.A. BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucl. Acids. Symp. Ser. 1999, 41, 95–98. [Google Scholar]
  33. Tamura, K.; Stecher, G.; Kumar, S. MEGA11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 11. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2021, 38, 3022–3027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Perrier, X.; Flori, A.; Bonnot, F. Data analysis methods. In Genetic Diversity of Cultivated Tropical Plants; Hamon, P., Seguin, M., Perrier, X., Glaszmann, J.C., Eds.; CRC Press: New York, NY, USA, 2003; pp. 43–76. [Google Scholar]
  35. Liu, K. PowerMarker: Integrated analysis environment for genetic marker data. Bioinformatics 2005, 21, 2128–2129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Letunic, I.; Bork, P. Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) v4: Recent updates and new developments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, W256–W259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Kersey, P.J.; Allen, J.E.; Armean, I.; Boddu, S.; Bolt, B.J.; Carvalho-Silva, D.; Christensen, M.; Davis, P.; Falin, L.J.; Grabmueller, C.; et al. Ensembl genomes 2016: More genomes, more complexity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, D574–D580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Solovyev, V.; Kosarev, P.; Seledsov, I.; Vorobyev, D. Automatic annotation of eukaryotic genes, pseudogenes and promoters. Genome Biol. 2006, 7, S10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Waterhouse, A.; Bertoni, M.; Bienert, S.; Studer, G.; Tauriello, G.; Gumienny, R.; Heer, F.T.; de Beer, T.A.P.; Rempfer, C.; Bordoli, L.; et al. SWISS-MODEL: Homology modelling of protein structures and complexes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, W296–W303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Kumar, S.; DePauw, R.M.; Kumar, S.; Kumar, J.; Kumar, S.; Pandey, M.P. Breeding and adoption of biofortified crops and their nutritional impact on human health. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2023, 1520, 5–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Raboy, V.; Young, K.A.; Dorsch, J.A.; Cook, A. Genetics and breeding of seed phosphorus and phytic acid. J. Plant Physiol. 2001, 158, 489–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bhatt, V.; Muthusamy, V.; Panda, K.K.; Katral, A.; Chhabra, R.; Mishra, S.J.; Gopinath, I.; Zunjare, R.U.; Neeraja, C.N.; Rakshit, S.; et al. Expression dynamics of lpa1 gene and accumulation pattern of phytate in maize genotypes possessing opaque2 and crtrb1 genes at different stages of kernel development. Plants 2023, 12, 1745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Raboy, V.; Gerbasi, P.F.; Young, K.A.; Stoneberg, S.D.; Pickett, S.G.; Bauman, A.T.; Murthy PP, N.; Sheridan, W.F.; Ertl, D.S. Origin and seed phenotype of maize low phytic acid 1–1 and low phytic acid 2–1. Plant Physiol. 2000, 124, 355–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Shi, J.; Wang, H.; Schellin, K.; Li, B.; Faller, M.; Stoop, J.M.; Meeley, R.B.; Ertl, D.S.; Ranch, J.P.; Glassman, K. Embryo-specific silencing of a transporter reduces phytic acid content of maize and soybean seeds. Nat. Biotechnol. 2007, 25, 930–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Sood, S.; Flint-Garcia, S.; Willcox, M.C.; Holland, J.B. Mining natural variation for maize improvement: Selection on Phenotypes and Genes. In Genomics of Plant Genetic Resources; Tuberosa, R., Graner, A., Frison, E., Eds.; Springer: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014; Volume 1, pp. 615–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mayer, M.; Hölker, A.C.; González-Segovia, E.; Bauer, E.; Presterl, T.; Ouzunova, M.; Melchinger, A.E.; Schön, C.C. Discovery of benefcial haplotypes for complex traits in maize landraces. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 4954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Bhatt, V.; Muthusamy, V.; Panda, K.K.; Zunjare, R.; Ragi, S.; Baveja, A.; Chhabra, R.; Kasana, R.; Mehta, B.; Guleria, S.K.; et al. Enrichment of multinutrients in maize using genomic assisted stacking of lpa-1, opaque2, and crtRB1 genes. In Proceedings of the Abstracts of 43rd Annual Meeting of Tissue Culture Association-India (PTCA-I), International Symposium on “Advances in Plant Biotechnology and Nutritional Security” (APBNS-2022), New Delhi, India, 28–30 April 2022; pp. 225–226. Available online: https://apbns2022.com (accessed on 21 March 2023).
  48. Zunjare, R.U.; Chhabra, R.; Hossain, F.; Baveja, A.; Muthusamy, V.; Gupta, H.S. Molecular characterization of 5′ UTR of the lycopene epsilon cyclase (lcyE) gene among exotic and indigenous inbreds for its utilization in maize biofortification. 3 Biotech 2018, 8, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Chhabra, R.; Muthusamy, V.; Gain, N.; Katral, A.; Prakash, N.R.; Zunjare, R.U.; Hossain, F. Allelic variation in sugary1 gene affecting kernel sweetness among diverse-mutant and-wild-type maize inbreds. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2021, 296, 1085–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Tajima, F. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 1989, 123, 585–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kubicek, C.P.; Steindorff, A.S.; Chenthamara, K.; Manganiello, G.; Henrissat, B.; Zhang, J.; Cai, F.; Kopchinskiy, A.G.; Kubicek, E.M.; Kuo, A.; et al. Evolution and comparative genomics of the most common Trichoderma species. BMC Genom. 2019, 20, 485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Katral, A.; Muthusamy, V.; Zunjare, R.U.; Chhabra, R.; Maman, S.; Yadava, D.K.; Hossain, F. Allelic variation in Zmfatb gene defines variability for fatty acids composition among diverse maize genotypes. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 845255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Yang, Z.; Bielawski, J.P. Statistical methods for detecting molecular adaptation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2000, 15, 496–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Hossain, F.; Chhabra, R.; Devi, E.L.; Zunjare, R.U.; Jaiswal, S.K.; Muthusamy, V. Molecular analysis of mutant granule-bound starch synthaseI (waxy1) gene in diverse waxy maize inbreds. 3 Biotech 2019, 9, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Chhabra, R.; Muthusamy, V.; Baveja, A.; Katral, A.; Mehta, B.; Zunjare, R.U.; Hossain, F. Allelic variation in shrunken2 gene affecting kernel sweetness in exotic-and indigenous-maize inbreds. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0274732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Shin, J.H.; Kwon, S.J.; Lee, J.K.; Min, H.K.; Kim, N.S. Genetic diversity of maize kernel starch-synthesis genes with SNAPs. Genome 2006, 49, 1287–1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Delaneau, O.; Howie, B.; Cox, A.J.; Zagury, J.F.; Marchini, J. Haplotype estimation using sequencing reads. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2013, 93, 687–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Yang, J.; He, J.; Wang, D.; Shi, E.; Yang, W.; Geng, Q.; Wang, Z. Progress in research and application of InDel markers. Biodivers. Sci. 2016, 24, 237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Zhang, M.Z.; Fang, J.H.; Yan, X.; Liu, J.; Bao, J.S.; Fransson, G.; Andersson, R.; Jansson, C.; Aman, P.; Sun, C. Molecular insights into how a defciency of amylose affects carbon allocation-carbohydrate and oil analyses and gene expression profling in the seeds of a rice waxy mutant. BMC Plant Biol. 2012, 12, 230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Gaedeke, N.; Klein, M.; Kolukisaoglu, U.; Forestier, C.; Müller, A.; Ansorge, M.; Becker, D.; Mamnun, Y.; Kuchler, K.; Schulz, B.; et al. The Arabidopsis thaliana ABC transporter at MRP5 controls root development and stomata movement. EMBO J. 2001, 20, 1875–1887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Prakash, N.R.; Chhabra, R.; Zunjare, R.U.; Muthusamy, V.; Hossain, F. Molecular characterization of teosinte branched1 gene governing branching architecture in cultivated maize and wild relatives. 3 Biotech 2020, 10, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Gupta, S.K.; Rai, A.K.; Kanwar, S.S.; Sharma, T.R. Comparative analysis of zinc finger proteins involved in plant disease resistance. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, 42578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Aznar-Moreno, J.A.; Sánchez, R.; Gidda, S.K.; Martínez-Force, E.; Moreno-Pérez, A.J.; Calerón, M.V.; Garcés, R.; Mullen, R.T.; Salas, J.J. New insights into sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) FatA and FatB thioesterases, their regulation, structure and distribution. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Diagrammatic representation of positions of InDel-based markers position in Lpa1 gene (cyan triangle represents TSS (transcription start site); rhombus in green colour represents polyA site, red colour represents first major exon and grey colour represents exons).
Figure 1. Diagrammatic representation of positions of InDel-based markers position in Lpa1 gene (cyan triangle represents TSS (transcription start site); rhombus in green colour represents polyA site, red colour represents first major exon and grey colour represents exons).
Agriculture 13 01286 g001
Figure 2. Phylogenetic analysis of selected mutant and wild Lpa1 inbreds on the basis of (A) nucleotide sequences (Reference sequence, Gene ID: Zm00001eb003490) and (B) protein sequences (Reference sequence, Protein ID: A7KVC2). (Red colour indicates mutant-type inbred and green colour represent wild-type inbred).
Figure 2. Phylogenetic analysis of selected mutant and wild Lpa1 inbreds on the basis of (A) nucleotide sequences (Reference sequence, Gene ID: Zm00001eb003490) and (B) protein sequences (Reference sequence, Protein ID: A7KVC2). (Red colour indicates mutant-type inbred and green colour represent wild-type inbred).
Agriculture 13 01286 g002
Figure 3. Haplotype of Lpa1 gene using 15 InDel-based markers; each row represents the selected mutant and wild genotypes and columns represent the allele for a given marker, black purple colour: presence of DNA band, white box colour: absence of DNA band.
Figure 3. Haplotype of Lpa1 gene using 15 InDel-based markers; each row represents the selected mutant and wild genotypes and columns represent the allele for a given marker, black purple colour: presence of DNA band, white box colour: absence of DNA band.
Agriculture 13 01286 g003
Figure 4. Dendrogram representing lpa1-1 gene-based diversity using InDel markers.
Figure 4. Dendrogram representing lpa1-1 gene-based diversity using InDel markers.
Agriculture 13 01286 g004
Figure 5. Evolutionary relationship of lpa1-1 gene in maize and its orthologues in selected monocots (Green dots are Lpa1 wild-type maize inbreds; Red dots are lpa1-1 mutant-type maize inbreds and purple are orthologues).
Figure 5. Evolutionary relationship of lpa1-1 gene in maize and its orthologues in selected monocots (Green dots are Lpa1 wild-type maize inbreds; Red dots are lpa1-1 mutant-type maize inbreds and purple are orthologues).
Agriculture 13 01286 g005
Figure 6. Homology models of (A) Reference protein (protein ID: A7KVC2); (B) Mutant-type [A632 lpa1-1] protein obtained through Swiss Model.
Figure 6. Homology models of (A) Reference protein (protein ID: A7KVC2); (B) Mutant-type [A632 lpa1-1] protein obtained through Swiss Model.
Agriculture 13 01286 g006
Table 1. Details of diverse maize inbreds used in the study for characterization of Lpa1 gene.
Table 1. Details of diverse maize inbreds used in the study for characterization of Lpa1 gene.
S. No.InbredCodeTypeSource
1PMI-PV5Lpa1-wild-1Wild-typeICAR-IARI, New Delhi
2PMI-PV6Lpa1-wild-2Wild-typeICAR-IARI, New Delhi
3PMI-PV7Lpa1-wild-3Wild-typeICAR-IARI, New Delhi
4PMI-PV8Lpa1-wild-4Wild-typeICAR-IARI, New Delhi
5PMI-Q1Lpa1-wild-5Wild-typeICAR-IARI, New Delhi
6PMI-Q2Lpa1-wild-6Wild-typeICAR-IARI, New Delhi
7PMI-Q3Lpa1-wild-7Wild-typeICAR-IARI, New Delhi
8PMI-LP1-124lpa1-1-mutant-1Mutant-typeICAR-IARI, New Delhi
9A619 lpa1-1lpa1-1-mutant-2Mutant-typeUSDA-ARS, Aberdeen, ID, USA
10A632 lpa1-1lpa1-1-mutant-3Mutant-typeUSDA-ARS, Aberdeen, ID, USA
Table 2. List of maize genotypes and orthologue accessions of lpa1-1 gene with their gene and protein IDs.
Table 2. List of maize genotypes and orthologue accessions of lpa1-1 gene with their gene and protein IDs.
S. No.AccessionsGene IDProtein ID
1Lpa1-wild-1Zea maysNucleotide sequence generated in the present studyProtein sequence translated from nucleotide sequence
2Lpa1-wild-2
3Lpa1-wild-3
4Lpa1-wild-4
5Lpa1-wild-5
6Lpa1-wild-6
7Lpa1-wild-7
8lpa1-1-mutant-1
9lpa1-1-mutant-2
10lpa1-1-mutant-3
11ZmMRP4-B73-RefZm00001eb003490A7KVC2
12Aegilops tauschiAET4Gv20803900M8CWG8
13Ananas comosusAco010163A0A199URG9
14Asparagus officinalisA4U43_C10F18740A0A5P1E459
15Brachypodium distachyonBRADI_1g75590v3I1H9W0
16Dioscorea rotundataDRNTG_05198DRNTG_05198.1
17Eragrostis curvulaEJB05_08061TVU48425
18Hordeum vulgareHORVU.MOREX.r3.4HG0412040A0A287PXI6
19Leersia perrieriLPERR03G03070A0A0D9VPF0
20Musa acuminataMa08_g12530Ma08_t12530.1
21Musa acuminataMa11_g02290Ma11_t02290.2
22Oryza barthiiOBART03G03330A0A0D3FDN4
23Oryza brachyanthaOB03G13350J3LJV9
24Panicum hallii HAL2GQ55_9G618800A0A2T7CHT9
25Secale cerealeSECCE5Rv1G0369730SECCE5Rv1G0369730.1
26Setaria viridisSEVIR_9G548400v2A0A4U6TCN8
27Sorghum bicolorSORBI_3001G508200A0A1Z5SBX3
28Triticum aestivumTraesCS5A02G512500A0A1D5YDM9
29Triticum dicoccoidesTRIDC4BG057910TRIDC4BG057910.7
30Triticum turgidumTRITD5Av1G244640TRITD5Av1G244640.2
31Triticum urartuTuG1812G0500005238.01M8AP62
32Oryza sativa Japonica GroupOsABCC13Q10RX7
33Oryza sativa Indica GroupABCC13 BGIOSGA011835A2XCD4
34Oryza rufipogonORUFI03G03050A0A0E0NPI1
35Oryza nivaraONIVA03G03060A0A0E0GGM3
36Eragrostis tefEt_s2678-1.30-1.path1Et_s2678-1.30-1.mrna1
37Setaria italicaSETIT_033885mgK4A4T1
Table 3. Molecular diversity analyses among the 48 diverse genotypes using gene-based InDel markers.
Table 3. Molecular diversity analyses among the 48 diverse genotypes using gene-based InDel markers.
S. No.MarkerMajor Allele FrequencyNo. of AllelesGene DiversityHeterozygosityPIC
1lpa1-InDel-10.87502.000.21880.00000.1948
2lpa1-InDel-20.58333.000.57290.00000.5101
3lpa1-InDel-30.79172.000.32990.00000.2755
4lpa1-InDel-40.75002.000.37500.00000.3047
5lpa1-InDel-50.52083.000.61200.00000.5423
6lpa1-InDel-60.47923.000.57200.00000.4783
7lpa1-InDel-70.72922.000.39500.00000.3170
8lpa1-InDel-80.72922.000.39500.00000.3170
9lpa1-InDel-90.81252.000.30470.04170.2583
10lpa1-InDel-100.45833.000.60070.00000.5158
11lpa1-InDel-110.72923.000.42100.00000.3704
12lpa1-InDel-120.64583.000.50260.00000.4346
13lpa1-InDel-130.62503.000.50780.00000.4277
14lpa1-InDel-140.64582.000.45750.00000.3528
15lpa1-InDel-150.58333.000.51740.00000.4200
Mean0.66392.530.45210.00280.3813
PIC = Polymorphism information content.
Table 4. Physico-chemical characteristics of LPA1-1 protein in maize and its selected orthologues protein.
Table 4. Physico-chemical characteristics of LPA1-1 protein in maize and its selected orthologues protein.
S. No.SequenceCrop SpeciesAmino AcidMolecular WeightIsoelectric Point (pI)Negatively Charged aa (Asp + Glu)Positively Charged aa (Arg + Lys)Instability IndexAliphatic IndexGRAVY
1A7KVC2Zea mays1510166,790.198.4414515546.28107.190.19
2PMI-PV51196131,732.17.1612912847.47101.41−0.006
5PMI-PV61127122,784.478.5311112142.87105.980.094
4PMI-PV71076118,397.439.310513548.05102.49−0.02
3PMI-PV81275140,824.859.3610514549.87105.860.174
7PMI-Q11085119,470.427.8710110447.4108.470.229
6PMI-Q21186130,285.936.711511147.28106.690.173
8PMI-Q31176129,741.838.7611713450.07102.820.055
9A632 lpa 1-11134124,915.647.6611511748.581090.186
10PMI-LP1-1241004111,797.388.899811448.2396.74−0.024
11A619 lpa1-163270,300.036.59767447.23100.55−0.112
12M8CWG8Aegilops tauschi1504166,057.788.7615016646.28102.510.096
13A0A199URG9Ananas comosus1522168,424.558.2715215942.97103.210.168
14A0A5P1E459Asparagus officinalis58365,439.238.28586144.06103.220.108
15I1H9W0Brachypodium distachyon1505165,978.668.115115643.57104.510.162
16DRNTG_05198.1Dioscorea rotundata1522170,326.478.3614815640.46106.740.185
17TVU48425Eragrostis curvula1502165,632.697.6215115343.09105.880.185
18A0A287PXI6Hordeum vulgare1080120,082.528.2211512043.63104.930.096
19A0A0D9VPF0Leersia perrieri1505166,391.427.2315415444.29106.350.177
20Ma08_t12530.1Musa acuminata1511168,530.238.1815215842.51107.40.184
21Ma11_t02290.21502168,023.898.5615116343.58106.760.183
22A0A0D3FDN4Oryza barthii1385154,216.686.2815214445.36103.340.089
23J3LJV9Oryza brachyantha1128125,411.65.8813512144.12102.15−0.015
24A0A2T7CHT9Panicum hallii HAL21504165,872.848.1914615244.38106.80.178
25SECCE5Rv1G0369730.1Secale cereale1509165,870.617.9715215643.63105.150.173
26A0A4U6TCN8Setaria viridis1507166,595.778.4814515545.28106.770.177
27A0A1Z5SBX3Sorghum bicolor1512166,559.928.3114615444.67107.380.203
28A0A1D5YDM9Triticum aestivum1441159,222.767.0615014942.19104.740.155
29TRIDC4BG057910.7Triticum dicoccoides1483163,430.98.0915015542.55105.140.161
30TRITD5Av1G244640.2Triticum turgidum1080119,946.288.111511945.13104.570.091
31M8AP62Triticum urartu1346149,368.056.5714514141.59103.40.1
32Q10RX7Oryza sativa Japonica Group1446159,766.097.7815315543.48102.950.085
33A2XCD4Oryza sativa Indica Group1357149,630.276.3914814144.49104.520.11
34A0A0E0NPI1Oryza rufipogon1448160,012.387.4715415543.74102.810.084
35A0A0E0GGM3Oryza nivara1411155,399.847.2814914944.42102.540.075
36Et_s2678-1.30-1.mrna1Eragrostis tef71179,605.955.09947647.16105.88−0.005
37K4A4T1Setaria italica1435158,725.428.5314215345.2105.740.136
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bhatt, V.; Muthusamy, V.; Chhabra, R.; Katral, A.; Ragi, S.; Rojaria, V.; Chand, G.; Sarma, G.R.; Zunjare, R.U.; Panda, K.K.; et al. Molecular Characterization and Haplotype Analysis of Low Phytic Acid-1 (lpa1) Gene Governing Accumulation of Kernel Phytic Acid in Subtropically-Adapted Maize. Agriculture 2023, 13, 1286. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13071286

AMA Style

Bhatt V, Muthusamy V, Chhabra R, Katral A, Ragi S, Rojaria V, Chand G, Sarma GR, Zunjare RU, Panda KK, et al. Molecular Characterization and Haplotype Analysis of Low Phytic Acid-1 (lpa1) Gene Governing Accumulation of Kernel Phytic Acid in Subtropically-Adapted Maize. Agriculture. 2023; 13(7):1286. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13071286

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bhatt, Vinay, Vignesh Muthusamy, Rashmi Chhabra, Ashvinkumar Katral, Shridhar Ragi, Vinay Rojaria, Gulab Chand, Govinda Rai Sarma, Rajkumar Uttamrao Zunjare, Kusuma Kumari Panda, and et al. 2023. "Molecular Characterization and Haplotype Analysis of Low Phytic Acid-1 (lpa1) Gene Governing Accumulation of Kernel Phytic Acid in Subtropically-Adapted Maize" Agriculture 13, no. 7: 1286. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13071286

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop