Next Article in Journal
Effect of Microbial Preparation and Biomass Incorporation on Soil Biological and Chemical Properties
Previous Article in Journal
Deep Learning Models for the Classification of Crops in Aerial Imagery: A Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Increased Soil Aggregate Stability by Altering Contents and Chemical Composition of Organic Carbon Fractions via Seven Years of Manure Addition in Mollisols
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Trace Element Content in Soils with Nitrogen Fertilisation and Humic Acids Addition

by
Mirosław Wyszkowski
1,
Natalia Kordala
1 and
Marzena S. Brodowska
2,*
1
Department of Agricultural and Environmental Chemistry, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Łódzki 4 Sq., 10-727 Olsztyn, Poland
2
Department of Agricultural and Environmental Chemistry, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Akademicka 15 Str., 20-950 Lublin, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agriculture 2023, 13(5), 968; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13050968
Submission received: 5 April 2023 / Revised: 21 April 2023 / Accepted: 25 April 2023 / Published: 27 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Soil Organic Matter and Its Role in Soil Fertility)

Abstract

:
Application of mineral fertilisers can entail an increase in trace element content in the soil. In consequence, their elevated uptake by plants and transfer to further trophic chain links may occur. The aim of the research reported here was to determine the usefulness of the tested organic materials, such as humic acids, for reduction of the content of trace elements in two soils fertilised with excessive doses of nitrogen fertilisers. Soil type had a considerable effect on soil trace element content. The content of most trace elements (cadmium, lead, chromium, cobalt, nickel, manganese, and iron) was higher in loamy sand than in sand. Among the tested fertilisers, a higher content of most soil trace elements was found after the application of ammonium nitrate. Urea fertilisation led to a decrease in the content of cadmium, chromium, copper, and zinc in both soils; cobalt, manganese, and nickel in sand; and an increase in concentration of cobalt and manganese in loamy sand, relative to the subjects fertilised with ammonium nitrate. Urea ammonium nitrate solution (UAN) decreased the content of chromium, cadmium, copper, nickel, and zinc in both soils; lead in the sand; and cobalt in the loamy sand, while raising the content of lead in the loamy sand, relative to the subjects fertilised with ammonium nitrate. The impact of urea and UAN on the remaining trace element content in the soils was comparable to that effected by ammonium nitrate. The effect of humic acids on trace element content in the soil tended to be beneficial, as they reduced the soil concentrations of these elements compared to the control subject (without their application). However, it should be emphasised that their effect depended on nitrogen fertiliser form and soil type. Humic acids can effectively reduce the uptake of trace elements by some plant species.

1. Introduction

Fertilisation is a basic factor in ensuring good yields, and the application of mineral fertilisers, especially nitrogen ones, plays a key role in food production [1,2]. In the effort to satisfy the food demand of contemporary civilization, high-yielding cultivars are grown, which are characterized by a large requirement for nutrients [3,4]. As a consequence, considerable quantities of mineral fertilisers are constantly added to soil. The application of fertilisers, however, is a high energy-consuming process, and any excessive and irrational use of fertilisers has a negative impact on the environment, also causing the release of reactive forms of nitrogen into the atmosphere, which add to the greenhouse effect [5]. Mineral fertilisation, including its type, size of a dose applied, and date of application, also considerably affects soil trace elements speciation and regulation of their bioavailability [6,7]. Introducing fertilisers that contain reduced forms of nitrogen, such as ammonium sulphate or urea, to soil resulted in a decrease in soil pH and an increase in available trace element forms content [8]. Application of mineral fertilisers can also lead to the concurrent supply of trace elements to soil [9], as it has been demonstrated that the composition of some fertilisers is characterized by high levels of cadmium, copper, and chromium [10]. The accumulation of the mentioned elements in a fertiliser depends primarily on the technology used to make it and the material from which it is produced [11].
Humic substances (HS) are specific, complex, and heterogeneous mixtures of polydisperse organic compounds which appear naturally in aquatic and terrestrial environments [12]. They form in soils as a result of humification, which is the second most important organic process on Earth (after photosynthesis) [13]. Humification is a complex biochemical process consisting of decomposition and resynthesis of organic compounds as well as polymerisation and condensation of products of the former processes. Humification leads to the production of fractions of humic compounds: humic acids (HA), fulvic acids (HF), and humins (HM), which are very important for the quality of soil organic matter [14,15]. The application of organic matter to soil contributes to an increase in the amount of humic acid [16].
Humic substances play a very important role in various environmental processes. They regulate the global circulation of carbon and nitrogen, stimulate life processes of soil organisms and plants [17], and accelerate decomposition of substances that pollute the natural environment [18,19]. Humic acids (HA) behave similarly to auxin hormones and other growth stimulants [20]. They are also used as biostimulants. They accelerate the germination of seeds and elongation of roots [21,22,23]; enhance the growth, development, and yielding of plants [24,25], owing to the effect they have on the primary and secondary metabolism in plants [26,27]; and they also improve the availability of nutrients (mainly nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, magnesium, iron, and zinc) [21,28].
Humic acids are characterised by high water capacity, which enables them to prevent adverse effects of drought [29,30]. HA also demonstrate high reactivity and large sorption capacity (500–1200 cmol kg−1) [31], thereby shaping the buffer capacity of soil, mainly in acid and neutral pH [32], in addition to which they regulate bioavailability and mobility of trace elements in soil [33,34]. The amount and quality of humus in the soil affects the physical and chemical properties of the soil and improves its fertility [35]. Humic substances compose a pool of nutrients for plants and improve the soil’s texture and structure. Binding with mineral particles through multivalent cations (Ca2+, Mg2+), humic acids lead to the formation of stable soil aggregates [36], hence they influence water and air relations in soil as well as soil’s permeability [37,38]. This is particularly important in sandy soils [39]. The presence of humic acids in soil is a decisive factor for the soil’s production and retention functions, also playing a significant role in carbon sequestration, thereby contributing to the reduction of greenhouse effect [40]. Maji et al. [41] maintain that humic substances have a positive influence on the development of soil microorganisms; hence they are beneficial for the interaction of plants and beneficial microorganisms, the so-called PGPBs (plant growth-promoting bacteria), which stimulate the growth and development of many plants [42,43]. The sorption properties and ion-exchange capacity of humic substances mean that they can be applied to decrease the salinity of soil and improve the efficiency of fertilisation [35]. In addition, particular fractions of humus enable the soil to warm up quickly [14] and affect the enzymatic activity of cultivated soils [44].
The ability to interact with ions of trace elements is one of the most important properties of humic substances [12]. Immobilisation of trace elements by humic substances occurs via binding (complexing, ion exchange, and physical adsorption) or oxidation-reduction reactions [30,45,46]. As a result of these processes, the mobility and availability of elements change, or else their partial detoxication occurs [30]. Functional groups of these organic compounds have high affinity to inorganic ions, organic ions, and other molecules found in soil [47], and can form complexes with metal cations, such as cations of zinc, manganese, copper, and iron [25]. Weng et al. [48] demonstrated that humic substances created complexes with lead and copper more effectively than with cadmium, zinc, and nickel in soil solution of pH within the range of 3.7–6.1. The usefulness of humic acids for reduction of Cr(VI) to less toxic Cr(III) was proved by Zhilin et al. [49], and the course and success of the reaction depended on pH (the optimum pH was 5.4). Humic acids can also intensify the microbiological bioreduction of trace elements by playing the role of an acceptor of electrons. Gu and Chen [50] found that the reduction rate of Cr(VI) to U(VI) by Shewanella putrefaciens CN32 was enhanced in the presence of humic acids. In these conditions, about 50% of Cr(VI) and 82% U(VI) were reduced in the first 24 h of the reaction compared to about 10% of both elements in the control variant (where no organic matter fraction was added).
In view of the above, it is pertinent to take measures to improve the efficiency of fertilisation [51] while securing ecological and food safety [52]. In this context, the biological activity of humic substances and their use in agriculture are significant for the development of sustainable agriculture, and for lowering the environmental and economic costs associated with intensive farming.
Studies conducted on different soils in separate experiments do not necessarily reflect the true effect of humic acids on soil properties such as trace element content. A novelty of the research reported here is the comparison of the use of humic acids to reduce the trace element content of three nitrogen fertilisers—ammonium nitrate, urea, and urea ammonium nitrate solution (UAN)—simultaneously in one experiment.
The aim of the research was to determine the usefulness of the tested organic materials, such as humic acids, for reduction of trace element content in two soils fertilised with excessive doses of nitrogen fertilisers.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Methodology of the Experiment

A three-factorial pot experiment was used for this study. Our research hypotheses were that trace element contents would be higher in loamy sand than in sand; that their contents in the soil would vary depending on the form of nitrogen fertiliser used; and that humic acids would reduce the contents of these elements in the soil. The first order experimental factor was the application of humic acids, the second order factor was composed of three forms of nitrogen fertiliser, and the third order factor consisted of two soils from different textural classes. These were sand and loamy sand [53]. Soils for the pot experiment were taken from humus layers. Humic acids in doses 0, 0.05, 0.10, and 0.15 g kg−1 were applied to soil three times, in order to alleviate the potentially negative effect of nitrogen fertilisers. The doses of humic acids were established on the basis of earlier research, but also on the basis of fertiliser recommendations. The application of humic acids was carried out before sowing and during the growth of the test plant (maize): at the 5-leaf stage, and at the stage of intensive stem elongation. Three nitrogen fertilisers were compared in the trials: ammonium nitrate (34%), urea (46%), and urea ammonium nitrate solution (UAN) (32%). All subjects received the same dose of nitrogen: 160 mg N per kg of soil. At the same time, each pot was supplied with phosphorus and potassium fertilisers (Super FosDar 40 and KCl 50) in doses of 60 mg P and 170 mg K per kg of soil. Humic acids were added to the soil in the form of an organic-mineral fertiliser called Humik. The chemical composition of Humik was as follows: humic acids 25%, organic carbon 22%, nitrogen (N) 4%, phosphorus (P2O5) 0.10%, potassium oxide (K2O) 5%, magnesium (MgO) 0.5%, amino acids 10%, and betaine 10%. More detailed information on soil properties can be found in Table 1 and another published paper [54].
At the beginning of the experiment, the soil was sieved through a sieve with a mesh size of 1 cm. A weighed batch of 9 kg of soil was mixed carefully by hand with the nitrogen fertiliser, humic acid first dose, as well as the phosphorus and potassium fertilisers. Next, the soil was placed in pots and seeds of the maize cultivar Kadryl were sown. Planting density was 6 plants per pot. Soil moisture was maintained at 60% of maximum capacity while the plants grew and developed. The research was carried out in triplicate. When the maize plants were harvested at tassel emergence stage (BBCH 59), soil samples were taken and analysed in the laboratory.

2.2. Methods of Laboratory Analyses

A mixture of concentrated hydrochloric acid (HCl analytical grade—1.18 g cm−3) and nitric acid (HNO3 analytical grade—1.40 g cm−3) was used to digest soil samples. In line with the US-EPA3051 methodology [55], soil was digested in the microwave digestion system MARS 6 (CEM Corporation, Matthews, NC, the USA), and the content of trace elements was determined using the atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS) method [56] on a SpectrAA 240FS spectrometer (Varian Inc., Mulgrave, VIC, Australia). To ensure high accuracy of the results, the Fluka reference materials (51994 for Cd, 16595 for Pb, 02733 for Cr, 42242 for Ni, 188227 for Zn, 38996 for Cu, 63534 for Mn, 16596 for Fe, 119785.0100 for Co) were used in addition to the Soil S-1 Certified Analytical Reference Material (the AGH University of Science and Technology in Kraków, Poland). Prior to the experiment, a Mastersizer 3000 apparatus (Malvern Instruments Ltd., Worcestershire, United Kingdom) was used to analyse the grain-size composition of the soil by laser. Soil samples were analysed for basic properties: soil reaction (pH) by the potentiometric method in a water solution KCL at 1 m DM−3 [56]; content of total nitrogen by the Kjeldahl method; available phosphorus and potassium by the Egner-Riehm method [56]; available magnesium by the Schachtschabel method [56], and trace elements by the AAS method [56].

2.3. Methods of Statistical Analysis

The experimental results were statistically processed using Statistica software [57]. Two-factor analysis of variance ANOVA using the Tukey HSD test (p ≤ 0.01), as well as principal component analysis (PCA), were performed, in addition to calculating the percentage of observed variance and the simple Pearson correlation coefficients.

3. Results

Trace element content in soils varied according to soil type, nitrogen fertiliser form, and humic acid applied (Table 2).

3.1. Content of Trace Elements in Soil Depending on Type of Soil and Form of Nitrogen Fertilisers

The type of soil had a considerable impact on the soil content of trace elements (Table 2). The content of most trace elements was higher in loamy sand than in sand. The mean differences in content were as follows: 8% for cobalt, 11% for chromium, 16% for iron, 24% for nickel, 34% for manganese, 35% for lead, and 57% for cadmium. The content of zinc was on mean 4% and that of copper 10%, lower in loamy sand than in sand.
Among the tested fertilisers, the highest content of most of the trace elements in soil was observed after the application of ammonium nitrate (Table 2). Fertilisation with urea resulted in a lower content of cadmium (means: 31% in sand and 5% in loamy sand), chromium (by 40% in sand and 47% in loamy sand), copper (by 21% in sand and 10% in loamy sand), zinc (by 12% in sand and in loamy sand), cobalt (by 15% in sand), manganese (by 5% in sand) and nickel (by 4% in sand), while raising the concentration of cobalt (by 10% in loamy sand) and manganese (by 5% in loamy sand) compared to the subjects fertilised with ammonium nitrate. The influence of urea and UAN on the content of the other trace elements in soil was comparable to that produced by ammonium nitrate.

3.2. Effect of Humus Acids on Content of Trace Elements in Soils

The influence of humic acids on trace element content in soils was generally positive, as they resulted in reduced concentrations thereof compared to the control series (where no humic acids were applied) (Table 2). However, it should be highlighted that their exact effects depended on the form of nitrogen fertiliser and soil type.
In the first series of the experiment (with ammonium nitrate), the highest dose of humic acids (0.15 g kg−1) caused the following reductions in the content of: cobalt 7%, copper 9%, lead and nickel 12%, cadmium 14%, and chromium 19% in sand; and the concentrations of nickel by 12%, copper and cobalt by 13%, chromium by 22%, and cadmium by 28% in loamy sand, in comparison with the subject where no humic acids were added to soil (Table 2). The highest dose of humic acids also caused an increase in the soil content of lead by 14% in loamy sand. However, it should be mentioned that even the lowest dose of humic acids (0.05 g kg−1) contributed to a rise in lead and zinc content in sand, and cobalt in loamy sand, while the subsequently higher dose (0.10 g kg−1) also raised cobalt concentration in sand as well as nickel and zinc in loamy sand. When higher doses of humic acids were applied, the content of these trace elements in the soils was reduced.
The effect of humic acids in the series with urea or UAN on the content of trace elements in soils tended to be even stronger than in the subjects fertilised with ammonium nitrate, although this was not unidirectional (Table 2). Humic acids in the subjects treated with urea caused a decrease in the content of iron by 4% at most, manganese by 6%, cadmium by 23%, nickel by 33%, copper by 36%, lead by 44%, and chromium by 54% in sand; and the concentration of cobalt by 26%, lead and chromium by 27%, and cadmium by 31% in loamy sand; as well as an increase in the concentration of zinc by 20%, cobalt by 23% in sand, and copper and iron by 5% in loamy sand, relative to the control. The second dose of humic acids (0.10 g kg−1) caused an increase in the content of nickel and zinc in loamy sand, while their highest dose (0.15 g kg−1) had a reducing effect.
The application of humic acids to soils fertilised with UAN caused a decrease in the content of zinc by 15%, nickel by 19%, lead by 29%, chromium by 52%, and cadmium by 58% in sand; and zinc and cobalt by 28%, cadmium by 34%, and chromium by 63% in loamy sand (Table 2). The smallest dose of humic acids (0.05 g kg−1) raised the content of copper in sand, and nickel in sand and loamy sand, while the second dose (0.10 g kg−1) resulted in an increase in the content of cobalt in sand and lead in loamy sand, relative to the control. The content of these elements in the soils were reduced by the higher doses of humic acids.
The PCA performed (Figure 1) shows that the total value of the parameters describing trace element content in soils was 43.60% in the first group, and 26.30% of the correlation of the set in the second group. Only the vector of the cobalt content was very short, implicating a very weak relationship of this element with the analysed factors. Vectors of most of the other trace elements in soil were of a similar length, and the vectors of the concentrations of lead, nickel, and zinc were somewhat shorter than the lengths of the other vectors. Manganese content in soil demonstrated the highest positive correlation with the concentration of iron, and lead with nickel and cadmium. Copper and chromium and zinc were also positively correlated. There was also a weak but negative correlation between the concentrations of iron and manganese versus the concentration of copper in soil. The distribution of the data resulting from the experiment, shown in Figure 2, justifies the conclusion that the cumulative effects of humic acids (especially those applied at the medium and highest doses) on the total soil trace element concentrations were stronger in the pots fertilised with urea or UAN than in those treated with ammonium nitrate.
The percentage of observed variance was calculated (Figure 3) in order to summarise the effects of the experimental factors on soil trace element content. The results substantiate the claim that soil type had the greatest effect on the content of lead (41.3%), iron (86.9%), and manganese (95.4%), and, rather considerably, on the concentration of cadmium (34.1%) in the soils. Nitrogen fertilisation form had the greatest effect on the content of zinc (40.3%), nickel (42.0%), copper (43.4%), cadmium (47.5%), and chromium (60.9%) in the soils. Humic acids produced a slightly weaker influence on soil trace element contents, but their positive effect was especially evident for cobalt (20.6%), as well as chromium (12.6%) and cadmium (11.5%). It is worth mentioning that humic acids were effective in reducing the soil content of trace elements when applied together with nitrogen fertilisers (zinc and lead) and in the interaction with fertilisers and type of soil (zinc, cobalt, and copper).

4. Discussion

4.1. Content of Trace Elements in Soil Depending on Type of Soil and Form of Nitrogen Fertilisers

The content of trace elements in soil depends on its type [58,59]. The content of most trace elements (cobalt, chromium, iron, nickel, manganese, lead, and cadmium) in soil was higher in loamy sand than in sand. An inverse relationship was found for zinc and copper. Trace element levels generally increase with increasing soil organic matter, including humic acids [58].
As regards the tested fertilisers, in the experiment discussed in this article, the highest content of most trace elements (especially nickel, copper, cobalt, chromium, and cadmium) in soil was noted after the application of ammonium nitrate; this content was lower in soil fertilised with urea or UAN. Analogous results were reported by Brodowska et al. [60], who in their study found an increase in cadmium, chromium, nickel, and manganese content and a decrease in lead content in soil under the fertilisation with nitrogen (UAN, in doses of 130 and 170 mg N kg−1 of soil). The same effect of nitrogen fertilisation on the content of nickel, manganese, and chromium content in soil has been demonstrated by Kuppusamy et al. [61]. Rutkowska et al. [62] studied the influence of mineral fertilisation on changes in the concentrations of trace elements in light soil. They found that nitrogen fertilisation significantly raised the content of zinc, copper, manganese, and iron, while depressing the content of boron and molybdenum in the soil solution. A positive correlation between ammonium sulphate application (at a dose of 1.66 g m−2) and soil cadmium and lead content has been demonstrated by Symanowicz et al. [63]. Meanwhile, under the same conditions, ammonium sulphate fertilisation resulted in decreased concentrations of chromium, copper and zinc in soil. Atafar et al. [64] also showed that higher nitrogen doses stimulated soil cadmium and lead accumulation.
Persistent mineral fertilisation leads to a rise in soil trace element content. In an experiment completed by Wierzbowska et al. [65], mineral fertilisation (NPK) over several years (11 years) resulted in an increase in the bioavailable forms of copper, nickel, lead, and zinc in the soil, compared to the control (no fertilisation). Mineral fertilisation carried out for many years can also considerably modify soil properties, including pH, organic matter content, or the content of available forms of macronutrients. Such changes, in turn, affect the content of phytoavailable fractions of trace elements in soil, and thereby their levels of accumulation in plants [66,67]. This is evidenced by the study results achieved by Fan et al. [68], showing that long-term application of nitrogen fertilisers (30 years; urea at a dose of 75 kg N ha−1) lowered the soil pH (6.47 versus 5.73) and elevated the content of copper, iron, manganese, and zinc in the soil solution. Trace elements, introduced together with nitrogen (and other fertilisers) into the soil, are then taken up by plants [69].

4.2. Effect of Humus Acids on Content of Trace Elements in Soils

The buffer properties of soil mean that some of the trace elements are bound to the sorption complex, i.e., the colloidal substance and humic substance, and then become immobilised and unavailable to plant roots [70,71]. Thus, agricultural technologies used to increase soil organic matter content in contribute to immobilising trace elements and reducing the amounts of their bioavailable forms [72]. An example of such treatment is the application of humic substances to soil.
In this experiment, the application of humic substances led to a decrease in the content of many trace elements in soil, most often chromium, cadmium, lead, and nickel, and less often copper or cobalt. A similar tendency was noted by Sönmez and Alp [73], who studied the effect of humic acid amendment (0, 10, 20, 40 kg da−1) on soil properties, including trace element content. After a five-month-long field experiment, these authors concluded that the highest dose of humic acid increased organic matter content by 53.6% and contributed to a reduction in zinc (by 28%), cadmium (by 6%), and lead (by 10%) in soil, relative to the control. No impact on manganese and copper was recorded, while the content of iron and nickel in soil was significantly raised. In another experiment, completed by Rendana et al. [74], the soil application of an organic amendment containing humic acid (HT Organic Compound; at a dose of 250 kg or 500 kg) to the soil of a plot (40 × 40 m2) cultivated with rice resulted in a reduction in the content of cadmium, copper, chromium, and lead, in comparison to a series with mineral fertilisers (NPK). Wu et al. [75] also proved the reducing effect of humic acid on the mobility and content of available fractions of copper, cadmium and lead in soil.
The data from our study suggest that the decrease of trace element content in soil was probably associated with the properties of humic substances. Owing to their chemical structure and the presence of carboxyl and hydroxyl functional groups [76], they can form chelates with metal cations, which are stabilised by internal hydrogen bonds in humus. The formation of these metal-organic complexes results in the immobilisation of trace elements and their depressed migration in the soil environment [77]. Humic acids also indirectly increase the CEC of the soil [78], which depends on the organic matter content. The higher the CEC, the greater the ability of the soil to retain trace elements in its matrix [79].
Organic matter derived from natural and organic fertilisers and from plants (harvest residues, ploughed-in plants) does not persist very long in soil. The humification index for organic carbon introduced to soil with these fertilisers is usually no more than 10% [80,81]. The effect of humic substances [82] and compound fertilisers containing humic substances is much more durable. Therefore, it is justified to conduct further studies on the use of humic substances for fertilisation purposes and development of sustainable agriculture, and for the alleviation of the impact of trace elements originating from different sources on crops.

5. Conclusions

Trace element content in soils varied according to soil type, nitrogen fertiliser form, and humic acid applied. The type of soil had a considerable effect on soil trace element content. The content of most trace elements (cadmium, lead, chromium, cobalt, nickel, manganese, and iron) was higher in loamy sand than in sand. Among the tested fertilisers, the higher content of most of the soil trace elements was found after the application of ammonium nitrate. Urea fertilisation led to a decrease in the content of cadmium, chromium, copper, and zinc in both soils; cobalt, manganese, and nickel in the sand; and an increase in concentration of cobalt and manganese in the loamy sand, relative to the subjects fertilised with ammonium nitrate. UAN decreased the content of chromium, cadmium, nickel, copper, and zinc in both soils; lead in the sand; and cobalt in the loamy sand, while raising the content of lead in the loamy sand relative to the subjects fertilised with ammonium nitrate. The impact of urea and UAN on remaining trace element content in the soils was comparable to that effected by ammonium nitrate. The effect of humic acids on trace element content in the soil tended to be beneficial, as they reduced the soil concentrations of these elements compared to the control subject (without their application). However, it should be emphasised that their effect depended on nitrogen fertiliser form and soil type. Humic acids were effective in reducing soil trace element contents when applied together with nitrogen fertilisers (zinc and lead) and in the interaction with fertilisers and soil type (zinc, cobalt, and copper). Humic acids can be effective in reducing the uptake of some trace elements by their plant species.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and methodology, M.S.B. and M.W.; analysis, N.K.; writing—review and editing, M.W., N.K. and M.S.B.; supervision, M.W. and M.S.B.; funding acquisition, M.W. and M.S.B.; M.S.B. corresponding author. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The results presented in this paper were obtained as part of a comprehensive study financed by the University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, Department of Agricultural and Environmental Chemistry (grant No. 30.610.004-110), and by the University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Faculty of Agrobioengineering, Department of Agricultural and Environmental Chemistry (grant No. RKC/S/59/2021).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data are available in the manuscript and from the authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, nor in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Bindraban, P.S.; Dimkpa, C.; Nagarajan, L.; Roy, A.; Rabbinge, R. Revisiting fertilisers and fertilisation strategies for improved nutrient uptake by plants. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2015, 51, 897–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wyszkowski, M.; Brodowska, M.S. Potassium and nitrogen fertilization vs. trace element content of maize (Zea mays L.). Agriculture 2021, 11, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Tilman, D.; Cassman, K.G.; Matson, P.A.; Naylor, R.; Polasky, S. Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature 2002, 418, 671–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Timsina, J. Can organic sources of nutrients increase crop yields to meet global food demand? Agronomy 2018, 8, 214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Aryal, J.P.; Sapkota, T.B.; Krupnik, T.J.; Rahut, D.B.; Jat, M.L.; Stirling, C.M. Factors affecting farmers’ use of organic and inorganic fertilizers in South Asia. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 51480–51496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Parvizi, Y.; Ronaghi, A.; Maftoun, M.; Karimian, N.A. Growth, nutrient status, and chlorophyll meter readings in wheat as affected by nitrogen and manganese. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2004, 35, 1387–1399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wyszkowski, M.; Brodowska, M.S. Content of trace elements in soil fertilized with potassium and nitrogen. Agriculture 2020, 10, 398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rajaie, M.; Tavakoly, A.R. Effects of municipal waste compost and nitrogen fertilizer on growth and mineral composition of tomato. Int. J. Recycl. Org. Waste Agric. 2016, 5, 339–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Uprety, D.; Hejcman, M.; Száková, J.; Kunzová, E.; Tlustoš, P. Concentration of trace elements in arable soil after long-term application of organic and inorganic fertilizers. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosystems 2009, 85, 241–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kabata-Pendias, A. Trace Elements in Soil and Plants, 4th ed.; CRS Press, Taylor and Francis Group: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2010; pp. 1–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sommer, S.G.; Schjoerring, J.K.; Denmead, O.T. Ammonia emission from mineral fertilizers and fertilized crops. Adv. Agron. 2004, 82, 557–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Boguta, P.; D’Orazio, V.; Senesi, N.; Sokołowska, Z.; Szewczuk-Karpisz, K. Insight into the interaction mechanism of iron ions with soil humic acids. The effect of the pH and chemical properties of humic acids. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 245, 367–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Weber, J. Humic substances and their role in the environment. EC Agric. 2020, 3, 3–8. Available online: https://www.ecronicon.com/eco20/pdf/ECAG-03-ECO-0002.pdf (accessed on 24 January 2023).
  14. Stevenson, F.J. Humus Chemistry: Genesis, Composition, Reactions, 2nd ed.; John Wiley: New York, NY, USA; Chichester, UK, 1994; pp. 489–496. [Google Scholar]
  15. Jarukas, L.; Ivanauskas, L.; Kasparaviciene, G.; Baranauskaite, J.; Marksa, M.; Bernatoniene, J. Determination of organic compounds, fulvic acid, humic acid, and humin in peat and sapropel alkaline extracts. Molecules 2021, 26, 2995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Shahi Khalaf Ansar, B.; Kavusi, E.; Dehghanian, Z.; Pandey, J.; Asgari Lajayer, B.; Price, G.W.; Astatkie, T. Removal of organic and inorganic contaminants from the air, soil, and water by algae. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Li, Y.; Fang, F.; Wei, J.; Wu, X.; Cui, R.; Li Zheng, F.; Tan, D. Humic acid fertilizer improved soil properties and soil microbial diversity of continuous cropping peanut: A three-year experiment. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 12014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Sannino, F.; Spaccini, R.; Savy, D.; Piccolo, A. Remediation of highly contaminated soil from an industrial site by employing a combined treatment with exogeneous HS and oxidative biomimetric catalysis. J. Hazard. Mater. 2013, 262, 55–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kuráň, P.; Trögl, J.; Nováková, J.; Pilařová, V.; Dáňová, P.; Pavlorková, J.; Kozler, J.; Novák, F.; Popelka, J. Biodegradation of spilled diesel fuel in agricultural soil: Effect of humates, zeolite, and bioaugmentation. Sci. World J. 2014, 2014, 642427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hemati, A.; Alikhani, H.A.; Ajdanian, L.; Babaei, M.; Asgari Lajayer, B.; van Hullebusch, E.D. Effect of Different Enriched Vermicomposts, Humic Acid Extract and Indole-3-Acetic Acid Amendments on the Growth of Brassica napus. Plants 2022, 11, 227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Türkmen, Ö.; Dursun, A.; Turan, M.; Erdinç, Ç. Calcium and humic acid affect seed germination, growth, and nutrient content of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) seedlings under saline soil conditions. Acta Agric. Scand. Sect. B Plant Soil Sci. 2004, 54, 168–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Dinçsoy, M.; Sönmez, F. The effect of potassium and humic acid applications on yield and nutrient contents of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. var. Delfii) with same soil properties. J. Plant Nutr. 2019, 42, 2757–2772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zandonadi, D.B.; Santos, M.P.; Dobbss, L.B.; Olivares, F.L.; Canellas, L.P.; Binzel, M.L.; Okorokova-Façanha, A.L.; Façanha, A.R. Nitric oxide mediates humic acids-induced root development and plasma membrane H+-ATPase activation. Planta 2010, 231, 1025–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Canellas, L.P.; Olivares, F.L. Physiological responses to humic substances as plant growth promoter. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 2014, 1, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Nardi, S.; Schiavon, M.; Francioso, O. Chemical structure and biological activity of humic substances define their role as plant growth promoters. Molecules 2021, 26, 2256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bondareva, L.; Kudryasheva, N. Direct and Indirect Detoxification Effects of Humic Substances. Agronomy 2021, 11, 198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Savarese, C.; Cozzolino, V.; Verrillo, M.; Vinci, G.; De Martino, A.; Scopa, A.; Piccolo, A. Combination of humic biostimulants with a microbial inoculum improves lettuce productivity, nutrient uptake, and primary and secondary metabolism. Plant Soil 2022, 481, 285–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Leite, J.M.; Pitumpe Arachchige, P.S.; Ciampitti, I.A.; Hettiarachchi, G.M.; Maurmann, L.; Trivelin, P.C.O.; Prasad, P.V.V.; Sunoj, S.V.J. Co-addition of humic substances and humic acids with urea enhances foliar nitrogen use efficiency in sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.). Heliyon 2020, 6, e05100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Shen, J.; Guo, M.J.; Wang, Y.G.; Yuan, X.Y.; Wen, Y.Y.; Song, X.E.; Dong, S.Q.; Guo, P.Y. Humic acid improves the physiological and photosynthetic characteristics of millet seedlings under drought stress. Plant Signal. Behav. 2020, 15, 1774212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Yang, F.; Tang, C.; Antonietti, M. Natural and artificial humic substances to manage minerals, ions, water, and soil microorganisms. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021, 50, 6221–6239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Nortcliff, S.; Tan, K.H. (Eds.) Principles of Soil Chemistry, 4th ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2011; p. 362. [Google Scholar]
  32. Pertusatti, J.; Prado, A.G.S. Buffer capacity of humic acid: Thermodynamic approach. J. Colloid. Interface Sci. 2007, 314, 484–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Burlakovs, J.; Kļaviņš, M.; Osinska, L.; Purmalis, O. The impact of humic substances as remediation agents to the speciation forms of metals in soil. APCBEE Procedia 2013, 5, 192–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, Z.; Cao, M.; Cai, W.; Zeng, H. The effect of humic acid and fulvic acid on adsorption-desorption behavior of copper and zinc in the yellow soil. AIP Conf. Proc. 2017, 1820, 040027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yang, F.; Antonietti, M. The sleeping giant: A polymer view on humic matter in synthesis and applications. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2020, 100, 101182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yamaguchi, T.; Takei, T.; Yazawa, Y.; Wong, M.T.F.; Gilkes, R.J.; Swift, R.S. Effect of humic acid, sodium, and calcium additions on the formation of water-stable aggregates in Western Australian wheatbelt soils. Aust. J. Soil Res. 2004, 42, 435–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bartlová, J.; Badalíková, B.; Pospíšilová, L.; Pokorný, E.; Šarapatka, B. Water stability of soil aggregates in different systems of tillage. Soil Water Res. 2015, 10, 147–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ampong, K.; Thilakaranthna, M.S.; Gorim, L.Y. Understanding the role of humic acids on crop performance and soil health. Front. Agron. 2022, 4, 848621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Khan, R.U.; Khan, M.Z.; Khan, A.; Saba, S.; Hussain, F.; Jan, I.U. Effect of humic acid on growth and crop nutrient status of wheat on two different soils. J. Plant Nutr. 2018, 41, 453–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Guo, Y.; Ma, Z.; Ren, B.; Zhao, B.; Liu, P.; Zhang, J. Effects of humic acid added to controlled-release fertilizer on summer maize yield, nitrogen use efficiency and greenhouse gas emission. Agriculture 2022, 12, 448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Maji, D.; Misra, P.; Singh, S.; Kalra, A. Humic acid rich vermicompost promotes plant growth by improving microbial community structure of soil as well as root nodulation and mycorrhizal colonization in the roots of Pisum sativum. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2017, 110, 97–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Olivares, F.L.; Busato, J.G.; de Paula, A.M.; da Silva Lima, L.; Aguiar, N.O.; Canellas, L.P. Plant growth promoting bacteria and humic substances: Crop promotion and mechanisms of action. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 2017, 4, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zaborowska, M.; Woźny, G.; Wyszkowska, A.; Kucharski, J. Biostimulation of the activity of microorganisms and soil enzymes through fertilisation with composts. Soil Res. 2018, 56, 737–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sun, Q.; Liu, J.; Huo, L.; Li, Y.C.; Li, X.; Xia, L.; Zhou, Z.; Zhang, M.; Li, B. Humic acids derived from Leonardite to improve enzymatic activities and bioavailability of nutrients in a calcareous soil. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng. 2020, 13, 200–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Havelcov, M.; Mizera, J.; Skorov, I.; Pekař, M. Sorption of metal ions on lignite and the derived humic substances. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 161, 559–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Yao, J.; Kong, Q.; Qiu, Z.; Chen, L.; Shen, D. Patterns of heavy metal immobilization by MSW during the landfill process. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 375, 122060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Garcıa-Mina, J.M.; Antolin, M.C.; Sanchez-Diaz, M. Metal-humic complexes and plant micronutrient uptake: A study based on different plant species cultivated in diverse soil. Plant Soil 2004, 258, 57–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Weng, L.; Temminghoff, E.J.; Lofts, S.; Tipping, E.; Van Riemsdijk, W.H. Complexation with dissolved organic matter and solubility control of heavy metals in a sandy soil. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36, 4804–4810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Zhilin, D.M.; Schmitt-Kopplin, P.; Perminova, I.V. Reduction of Cr(VI) by peat and coal humic substances. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2004, 2, 141–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Gu, B.; Chen, J. Enhanced microbial reduction of Cr(VI) and U(VI) by different natural organic matter fractions. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2003, 67, 3575–3582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Barłóg, P.; Grzebisz, W.; Łukowiak, R. Fertilizers and fertilization strategies mitigating soil factors constraining efficiency of nitrogen in plant production. Plants 2022, 11, 1855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Gomiero, T. Soil Degradation, land scarcity and food security: Reviewing a complex challenge. Sustainability 2016, 8, 281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. IUSS Working Group WRB. World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014. World Soil Resources Report; International Soil Classification System for Naming Soils and Creating Legends for Soil Maps. Update 2015; World Soil Resources Reports No. 106; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2015; p. 182. Available online: https://www.fao.org/3/i3794en/I3794en.pdf (accessed on 20 January 2023).
  54. Brodowska, M.S.; Wyszkowski, M.; Kordala, N. Use of organic materials to limit the potential negative effect of nitrogen on maize in different soils. Materials 2022, 15, 5755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. US-EPA Method 3051A: Microwave Assisted Acid Digestion of Sediment, Sludges, Soils, and Oils; United States Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 2007; pp. 1–30.
  56. Ostrowska, A.; Gawliński, S.; Szczubiałka, Z. Methods for Analysis and Evaluation of Soil and Plant Properties; Institute of Environmental Protection: Warsaw, Poland, 1991; pp. 1–334. [Google Scholar]
  57. TIBCO Software Inc. Statistica Version 13; Data Analysis Software System; Tibco Software Inc.: Palo Alto, CA, USA, 2021; Available online: http://statistica.io (accessed on 20 May 2022).
  58. Ding, Z.; Li, Y.; Sun, Q.; Zhang, H. Trace elements in soils and selected agricultural plants in the Tongling Mining Area of China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Hrelja, I.; Šestak, I.; Delač, D.; Pereira, P.; Bogunović, I. soil chemical properties and trace elements after wildfire in Mediterranean Croatia: Effect of severity, vegetation type and time-since-fire. Agronomy 2022, 12, 1515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Brodowska, M.S.; Wyszkowski, M.; Bujanowicz-Haraś, B. Mineral fertilization and maize cultivation as factors which determine the content of trace elements in soil. Agronomy 2022, 12, 286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kuppusamy, S.; Yoon, Y.E.; Kim, S.Y.; Kim, J.H.; Lee, Y.B. Long-term inorganic fertilization effect on the micronutrient density in soil and rice grain cultivated in a South Korean paddy field. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2017, 48, 1603–1615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Rutkowska, B.; Szulc, W.; Łabętowicz, J. Influence of soil fertilization on concentration of microelements in soil solution of sandy soil. J. Elem. 2009, 14, 349–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Symanowicz, B.; Kalembasa, S.; Jaremko, D.; Niedbała, M. Effect of nitrogen application and year on concentration of Cu, Zn, Ni, Cr, Pb and Cd in herbage of Galega orientalis Lam. Plant Soil Environ. 2015, 61, 11–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Atafar, Z.; Mesdaghinia, A.; Nouri, J.; Homaee, M.; Yunesian, M.; Ahmadimoghaddam, M.; Mahvi, A.H. Effect of fertilizer application on soil heavy metal concentration. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2010, 160, 83–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Wierzbowska, J.; Kovačik, P.; Sienkiewicz, S.; Krzebietke, S.; Bowszys, T. Determination of heavy metals and their availability to plants in soil fertilized with different waste substances. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2018, 190, 567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Li, B.Y.; Zhou, D.M.; Cang, L.; Zhang, H.L.; Fan, X.H.; Qin, S.W. Soil micronutrient availability to crops as affected by long-term inorganic and organic fertilizer applications. Soil Tillage Res. 2007, 96, 166–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Rutkowska, B.; Szulc, W.; Sosulski, T.; Stępień, W. Soil micronutrient availability to crops affected by long-term inorganic and organic fertilizer applications. Plant Soil Environ. 2014, 60, 198–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Fan, J.; Ding, W.; Chen, Z.; Ziadi, N. Thirty-year amendment of horse manure and chemical fertilizer on the availability of micronutrients at the aggregate scale in black soil. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2012, 19, 2745–2754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Wyszkowski, M.; Brodowska, M.S.; Kordala, N. Trace element contents in maize following the application of organic materials to reduce the potential adverse effects of nitrogen. Materials 2023, 16, 215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Zhou, S.; Chen, S.; Yuan, Y.; Lu, Q. Influence of humic acid complexation with metal ions on extracellular electron transfer activity. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 17067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Malik, K.M.; Khan, K.S.; Rukh, S.; Khan, A.; Akbar, S.; Billah, M.; Bashir, S.; Danish, S.; Alwahibi, M.S.; Elshikh, M.S.; et al. Immobilization of Cd, Pb and Zn through organic amendments in wastewater irrigated soils. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Kwiatkowska-Malina, J. Functions of organic matter in polluted soils: The effect of organic amendments on phytoavailability of heavy metals. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2017, 123, 542–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Sönmez, F.; Alp, S. The Effects of applications humic acids on macronutrient, micronutrient, heavy metal and soil properties. YYU J. Agric. Sci. 2019, 29, 809–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Rendana, M.; Idris, W.M.R.; Rahim, S.A.; Rahman, Z.A.; Lihan, T. Effects of organic amendment on heavy metal and macronutrient contents in paddy soil. Sains Malays. 2022, 51, 379–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Wu, S.; Li, R.; Peng, S.; Liu, Q.; Zhu, X. Effect of humic acid on transformation of soil heavy metals. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2017, 207, 012089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Piccolo, A.; Spaccini, R.; De Martino, A.; Scognamiglio, F.; Di Meo, V. Soil washing with solutions of humic substances from manure compost removes heavy metal contaminants as a function of humic molecular composition. Chemosphere 2019, 225, 150–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Li, Q.; Wang, Y.; Li, Y.; Li, L.; Tang, M.; Hu, W.; Chen, L.; Ai, S. Speciation of heavy metals in soils and their immobilization at micro-scale interfaces among diverse soil components. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 825, 153862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Xu, J.; Mohamed, E.; Li, Q.; Lu, T.; Yu, H.; Jiang, W. Effect of humic acid addition on buffering capacity and nutrient storage capacity of soilless substrates. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 644229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Aydinalp, C.; Marinova, S. Distribution and forms of heavy metals in some agricultural soils. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2003, 12, 629–633. [Google Scholar]
  80. Maillard, É.; Angers, D.A. Animal manure application and soil organic carbon stocks: A meta-analysis. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2014, 20, 666–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Poeplau, C.; Kätterer, T.; Bolinder, M.A.; Börjesson, G.; Berti, A.; Lugato, E. Low stabilization of aboveground crop residue carbon in sandy soils of Swedish long-term experiments. Geoderma 2015, 237–238, 246–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Jensen, J.L.; Schjønning, P.; Watts, C.W.; Christensen, B.T.; Obour, P.B.; Munkholm, L.J. Soil degradation and recovery—Changes in organic matter fractions and structural stability. Geoderma 2020, 364, 114181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. PCA method for soil trace element content. Key: the vectors depict the variables (trace element content in soil).
Figure 1. PCA method for soil trace element content. Key: the vectors depict the variables (trace element content in soil).
Agriculture 13 00968 g001
Figure 2. Humic acid application and trace element content in soil (PCA method). Key: the dots represent samples with elements (I—sand, II—loamy sand; AN—ammonium nitrate, U—urea, and UAN—urea and ammonium nitrate solution; and HA doses: 0, 0.05, 0.10, and 0.15 g kg−1 of soil).
Figure 2. Humic acid application and trace element content in soil (PCA method). Key: the dots represent samples with elements (I—sand, II—loamy sand; AN—ammonium nitrate, U—urea, and UAN—urea and ammonium nitrate solution; and HA doses: 0, 0.05, 0.10, and 0.15 g kg−1 of soil).
Agriculture 13 00968 g002
Figure 3. Relative impact of soil type, nitrogen fertiliser form, and HA dose on trace element content in soil (in percent).
Figure 3. Relative impact of soil type, nitrogen fertiliser form, and HA dose on trace element content in soil (in percent).
Agriculture 13 00968 g003
Table 1. Soil characteristics.
Table 1. Soil characteristics.
ParameterSandLoamy Sand
% or Value Per kg−1 Soil
Grain size
<0.0020.68%2.50%
0.002–0.0507.44%19.95%
>0.05091.88%77.55%
Cation exchange capacity (CEC)76.11 mM (+)82.41 mM (+)
pH in KCl6.476.33
Total nitrogen0.579 g0.620 g
Available forms:
P125.35 mg105.48 mg
K65.02 mg91.07 mg
Mg62.36 mg40.99 mg
Total:
Cd0.602 mg0.850 mg
Pb10.26 mg11.97 mg
Cr22.68 mg22.47 mg
Ni22.60 mg26.78 mg
Zn21.16 mg21.09 mg
Cu4.685 mg4.236 mg
Mn223.6 mg284.3 mg
Fe8754 mg9998 mg
Co3.205 mg3.626 mg
Table 2. Trace element content of in soil (mg kg−1 DM).
Table 2. Trace element content of in soil (mg kg−1 DM).
HA Dose
g kg−1 of Soil
SandLoamy Sand
Ammonium NitrateUreaUANMeanAmmonium NitrateUreaUANMean
Cadmium
00.661 j–k0.472 ef0.304 bc0.479 D0.914 m 0.858 m0.626 h–j0.799 H
0.050.651 i–k0.444 e0.237 b0.444 C0.721 kl0.784 l0.533 hg0.679 G
0.100.623 h–i0.440 e0.153 a0.405 B0.737 l0.647 ij0.423 de0.602 F
0.150.567 jk0.363 cd0.128 a0.353 A0.658 i–k0.588 g–i0.416 de0.554 E
Mean0.626 D0.430 B0.206 A0.420 A0.758 F0.719 E0.500 C0.659 B
r−0.949−0.915−0.981−0.995−0.884−0.988−0.956−0.981
Lead
011.58 fg14.21 kl8.09 cd11.29 B12.22 gh15.16 m12.46 h13.28 A
0.0512.23 gh14.09 j–l7.39 b11.24 B13.43 ij13.67 j–l12.50 h13.20 A
0.1011.44 f8.43 d7.62 bc9.16 D12.91 hi13.51 i–k15.49 m13.97 E
0.1510.20 e7.96 b–d5.75 a7.97 C13.93 j–l11.10 f14.27 l13.10 A
Mean11.36 A11.17 A7.21 C9.92 A13.12 B13.36 B13.68 D13.39 B
r−0.751−0.915−0.861−0.9520.813−0.9480.7380.075
Chromium
023.05 ij17.05 ef6.81 b15.64 D22.85 ij11.53 d19.37 gh17.92 E
0.0523.28 j15.45 e 4.29 b14.34 A19.58 gh10.64 cd11.57 d13.93 A
0.1021.00 hj11.11 d 3.37 a11.83 B17.05 ef10.24 cd15.50 e14.26 A
0.1518.60 fg7.78 b3.26 a9.88 C17.92 fg8.46 bc7.18 b11.19 B
Mean21.48 E12.85 A4.43 B12.92 A19.35 D10.22 C13.41 A14.32 B
r−0.927−0.986−0.905−0.993−0.874−0.962−0.806−0.928
Nickel
025.53 hi27.59 k 20.40 e24.51 A31.57 m 26.36 ij20.30 e 26.08 D
0.0524.88 h 27.10 jk23.01 g25.00 A 32.31 mn30.15 l 21.68 f 28.05 F
0.1022.88 g 18.67 cd17.70 c19.75 C32.85 no33.93 o 19.71 de28.83 G
0.1522.50 fg18.38 c16.47 a19.12 B27.80 k 32.80 no20.16 e 26.92 E
Mean23.95 E22.94 B19.40 D22.09 A31.13 A30.81 A20.46 C27.47 B
r−0.965−0.913−0.757−0.895−0.6090.887−0.3630.352
Zinc
022.83 ef19.81 bc21.20 c–e21.28 AB22.72 ef17.69 a23.80 fg21.40 A
0.0526.06 h 21.02 c–e21.05 c–e22.71 C20.54 cd22.17 d–f18.41 ab20.37 BD
0.1023.53 fg19.85 bc20.56 cd21.31 AB25.10 gh22.61 ef18.45 ab22.05 AC
0.1523.60 fg23.83 fg18.02 ab21.82 AC23.80 fg18.45 ab17.15 a19.80 D
Mean24.01 D21.13 B20.21 A21.78 B23.04 C20.23 A19.45 A20.91 A
r-0.0200.745−0.8730.0410.5220.139−0.868−0.399
Copper
05.834 j 5.147 h 3.688 bc4.890 F 4.841 g 4.047 d–f4.124 d–f4.337 BC
0.055.674 j 5.246 h 4.276 f 5.065 F 4.651 g 3.887 cd4.032 d–f4.190 B
0.105.590 ij4.101 d–f4.208 ef4.633 D 4.253 f 3.933 c–e3.917 cd4.034 A
0.155.338 hi3.291 a 3.589 b 4.073 AB4.208 ef4.238 f4.040 d–f4.162 AB
Mean5.609 C4.446 B3.940 A4.665 B4.488 B4.026 A4.028 A4.181 A
r−0.980−0.934−0.134−0.860−0.9620.511−0.557−0.708
Manganese
0244.3 a–c242.2 a–c245.5 bc244.0 A320.8 de 338.0 ef319.7 de326.2 B
0.05245.5 bc233.0 a–c249.9 c242.8 A322.5 d–f340.2 f320.6 de327.8 B
0.10247.2 bc228.7 ab249.4 c241.8 A316.6 d330.3 d–f317.9 d321.6 B
0.15246.2 bc226.6 a245.0 a–c239.3 A312.7 d329.2 d–f317.7 d319.9 B
Mean245.8 A232.6 C247.5 A242.0 A318.2 B334.4 D319.0 B323.9 B
r0.784−0.954−0.101−0.977−0.886−0.853−0.798−0.869
Iron
09097 b–d8842 a–d8858 a–d8932 A10,447 ef10,371 ef10,113 e10310 B
0.059202 cd8774 a–c9090 b–d9022 A10,490 ef10,403 ef10,264 e10386 B
0.109102 b–d8615 ab9335 d9017 A10,538 ef10,917 f10,160 e10538 B
0.159067 b–d8472 a8945 a–d8828 A10,416 ef10,928 f10,001 e10448 B
Mean9117 A8676 C9057 A8950 A10,473 B10,655 B10,135 D10421 B
r−0.418−0.9880.313−0.450−0.1100.911−0.5210.757
Cobalt
03.345 a–d2.776 a–c3.263 a–d3.128 BC3.895 a–d4.422 b–d3.768 b–d4.028 A
0.053.428 a–d3.018 a–d3.766 a–d3.404 AB4.113 cd4.647 d3.428 a–d4.063 A
0.104.647 d3.180 a–d4.290 cd4.039 A3.596 a–d4.156 a–d3.263 a–d3.672 AB
0.153.098 a–d3.428 a–d3.263 a–d3.263 A–C3.387 a–d3.262 a2.697 ab3.115 C
Mean3.630 A3.101 A3.646 A3.459 A3.748 A4.122 A3.289 A3.720 A
r0.0890.9970.1380.333−0.822−0.844−0.975−0.919
ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD test; A–H, a–o: different letters significant at p ≤ 0.01; r: correlation coefficient.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wyszkowski, M.; Kordala, N.; Brodowska, M.S. Trace Element Content in Soils with Nitrogen Fertilisation and Humic Acids Addition. Agriculture 2023, 13, 968. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13050968

AMA Style

Wyszkowski M, Kordala N, Brodowska MS. Trace Element Content in Soils with Nitrogen Fertilisation and Humic Acids Addition. Agriculture. 2023; 13(5):968. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13050968

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wyszkowski, Mirosław, Natalia Kordala, and Marzena S. Brodowska. 2023. "Trace Element Content in Soils with Nitrogen Fertilisation and Humic Acids Addition" Agriculture 13, no. 5: 968. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13050968

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop