Next Article in Journal
Progress of Euhalophyte Adaptation to Arid Areas to Remediate Salinized Soil
Previous Article in Journal
Mitigation of High Solar Irradiance and Heat Stress in Kiwifruit during Summer via the Use of Alleviating Products with Different Modes of Action—Part 2 Effects on Fruit Quality, Organoleptic, and Phytochemical Properties at Harvest and after Storage
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Dietary Crude Protein and Protease Levels on Performance, Immunity Capacity, and AA Digestibility of Broilers

National Engineering Research Center of Biological Feed, Institute of Feed Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agriculture 2023, 13(3), 703; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13030703
Submission received: 27 January 2023 / Revised: 7 March 2023 / Accepted: 13 March 2023 / Published: 17 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Farm Animal Production)

Abstract

:
Exogenous proteases are promising to stimulate the application of low-protein diets for broilers. A total of 540 1-day-old Arbor Acres male broilers were randomly assigned to 9 groups with 6 replicates of 10 birds. A 3 × 3 factorial, completely randomized arrangement was used to evaluate the effects of dietary crude protein (CP) and protease levels on growth and slaughter performance, immunity capacity, and apparent ileal digestibility (AID) of amino acids (AA). Dietary CP levels were 20.0%, 19.5%, or 19.0% during the starter phase, and 18.0%, 17.5%, or 17.0% during the finisher phase. Protease levels were 0, 250, or 500 mg/kg in diets throughout the trial. The trial lasted for 42 days. Weight gain and feed efficiency of broilers decreased as dietary CP lowered, but improved with protease supplementation. Dietary CP and protease levels had few effects and interactions on carcass characteristics, immune organ indexes, and immunoglobulin concentrations. The AID of most AA was improved by dietary CP decrease or protease supplementation. In conclusion, reducing dietary CP decreased the performance and immune capacity of broilers but increased the AID of AA. Almost independent of dietary CP level, dietary protease addition improved the performance of broilers, probably through the enhancement of AA digestibility, and had no effect on carcass traits.

1. Introduction

Protein raw materials are the most expensive ingredients of poultry feeds [1]. It is uneconomical and environmentally unfriendly when the crude protein (CP) level of broiler diets exceeds optimal levels. The digestion and absorption rate of nutrients will be reduced, excess protein in the lower gastrointestinal tract can also be used as food by opportunistic pathogens, leading to an increased risk of disease, and the excess protein in the body will be broken down and used for energy or excreted as uric acid [2]. Protein in poultry diets is mainly provided by soybean meal, but the animal feed industry in China is facing a shortage of soybean meal resources. Low-protein diets are one strategy to narrow the gap between yields and the consumption of soybean meal and also minimize the potential environmental pollution of nitrogen excretion. However, lowering the CP content in diets may compromise growth performance [3] and immune functions [4] because the content of essential or nonessential amino acids (AA) will be reduced when the dietary protein level is reduced [5]. A low CP diet may also lead to the accumulation of abdominal fat in broilers [6,7]. Unconventional protein feedstuffs, including cottonseed, rapeseed, corn gluten, and dried distillers grains with soluble, are potential replacements for soybean meal [8]. However, anti-nutritional factors in these miscellaneous meals can affect the contact between endogenous enzymes and substrates and reduce nutrition. Three classes of enzymes, phytases, carbohydrases, and proteases, can reduce the effect of antinutritional factors and improve feed utilization [9].
Protease, a protein-digesting enzyme, can break down protein-bound starch stored in feed ingredients and allow the energy in the protein-bound starch to be used by poultry [10]. Proteases can also effectively degrade protein anti-nutritional factors present in feed ingredients such as soybean meal [11]. Exogenous protease supplementation can improve CP and energy digestibility in the low-CP diets used for broiler chickens or ducks [12,13,14]. The effects of low-CP diets on growth performance are not consistent yet. Supplementation of protease to low-CP diets has no effects on feed intake (FI), body weight gain (BWG), or feed conversion ratio (FCR) [7]. However, supplementation of diets with exogenous proteases increased body weight (BW) and BWG [13]. The differences may result from the contents of low-CP and protease in diets. Based on the above, we propose a scientific hypothesis that proteases could probably improve the digestibility of broiler feed, thereby promoting the wide application of low-protein diets in broilers. Therefore, the current study aimed to determine the effects of dietary CP levels and protease concentrations on the broiler raising industry from the perspectives of growth performance, carcass traits, body health (serum parameters, immune indicators), and nutrient utilization (apparent ileal CP and AA digestibility) in broilers.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Broilers, Diets and Design of Experiment

Five hundred and forty Arbor Acres male chicks (one day old) were randomly allocated to nine dietary treatments consisting of six replicates. Each replicate with 10 birds was raised in one wire floor cage (120 × 100 × 48 cm) in a three-level battery in a room with automatic environmental control at the Nankou Animal Experiment Base (Beijing, China) in the spring. A two-phase feeding program (days 1–21 and 22–42) was used in the experiment on the basis of the actual production experience. The chicken room was kept under continuous light for the first three days and 23 h light for the rest time. The temperature was maintained at 32 °C for the first three days and then lowered by 2 °C at weekly intervals until it reached 24 °C. Mechanical longitudinal ventilation was used to keep the ammonia concentration in the room below 20 ppm. The humidity was maintained at 60~70% for the first two weeks and then at 50–60%. Birds had free access to feed and water and got vaccinations according to the established schedule. Details of the protein levels and protease concentrations in each treatment group are shown in Table 1. Pichia pastoris protease used in the current study was supplied by Challenge Corporation (Beijing, China). Pichia pastoris protease is an enzyme mainly composed of alkaline protease with an activity of 20,000 U. All diets were provided (cold pelleting, diameter 0.2 cm), with crumbles in the starter and pellets in the finisher. The experimental diets were prepared in a 3 × 3 factorial, completely randomized arrangement. There were both three levels for dietary CP content (20%, 19.5%, and 19% in the starter phase; 18%, 17.5%, and 17% in the finisher phase) and protease supplementation (0 mg/kg, 250 mg/kg, or 500 mg/kg throughout the trial). The protease levels were based on pre-experimental results. The ingredient and nutrient compositions of diets are listed in Table 2. Protease was premixed with soybean meal before being added to diets.

2.2. Growth and Slaughter Performance

After 8 h fasting, using replicate as a measuring unit, the BW of the birds was weighed on the mornings of days 21 and 42. Feed intake was recorded every week. Average daily gain (ADG), average daily feed intake (ADFI), death and culling rate (DCR), and ratio of feed to gain (FCR) were calculated.
At the end of the trial, one bird with the medium average BW of the replicate was chosen from each replicate, and blood was sampled from the heart after starving for 8 h. Then the selected birds were slaughtered to score the carcass, breast, leg yields, and abdominal fat after hot de-feathering and chilling at room temperature. Dressing was calculated as the weight of broilers after bloodletting and hair removal divided by the live weight. Half-eviscerated weight of broilers is the dressing weight minus the weight of the trachea, esophagus, crop, intestine, spleen, pancreas, gallbladder, reproductive organs, and the cuticular membrane and contents of the muscular stomach. Full-eviscerated weight is the weight of half-eviscerated weight minus the weight of the heart, liver, glandular stomach, muscle stomach, fat, and head and feet. Half- or full-eviscerated rates were calculated from the ratio of their weight to the live weight of broilers. Breast weight was recorded with both pectoralis major and minor without skin. Abdominal fat includes the tissues surrounding the gizzard and intestines, around the cloaca and bursa of Fabricius, and adjoining the abdominal muscle. Carcass yield was expressed as the percentage of live weight at 42 d. The ratios of breast yield, leg yield, and abdominal fat were calculated based on the chilled, full-eviscerated weight. The European performance index (EPI) was calculated using the formula.
EPI = live weight ,   kg × ( 1 D C R ) / ( F C R × 42 ) × 10,000

2.3. Immune Organ Indexes

After slaughter, the thymus, spleen, and bursa were isolated, and the blood on the surface of the organs was removed with filter paper. Fresh weight was weighed to calculate the immune organ index. The spleen, thymus, and bursa indexes were generated using the formula.
Immune organ index   ( % ) = 100 × immune organ weight   ( g ) / B W   ( g )

2.4. Serum Biochemical Indices

Blood samples were centrifuged (TDL-80-2B, Anke, Shanghai, China) for 10 min at 1500 rpm and 4 °C after standing for 30 min at room temperature to collect the serum, which was stored at −70 °C until analysis.
The contents of immunoglobulin A (IgA), immunoglobulin G (IgG) immunoglobulin M (IgM), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), creatinine (CREA), blood ammonia (BA), and uric acid (UA) in serum were measured by an automated system (7600 analyzer, Hitachi High Technologies Co., Tokyo, Japan) with commercial kits following manufacturer guidelines (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China).

2.5. Apparent Ileal Digestibility Assay

All broilers in the trial aged from 36 to 42 days were fed the corresponding experimental diets supplemented with 0.4% of titanium dioxide as an exogenous indicator to analyze the digestibility coefficients of crude protein and apparent ileal AA digestibility [15].
Three forty-two-day-old birds from each replicate were sacrificed. The contents of the ileum from Meckel’s diverticulum to about 50 mm before the ileocecal junction were gathered in a plastic dish. The contents were immediately frozen, stored at −20 °C, and then freeze-dried. The dried ileal digesta were ground to pass through a 0.45 mm particle size filter and stored in ziplock bags at −4 °C prior to analysis.
The total nitrogen levels of ileal contents were assessed by an automatic Kjeldahl analyzer (KDY-9830, Ketuo, Beijing, China). The AA of ileal digesta was determined by an automatic AA analyzer (Hitachi L-8800, Tokyo, Japan). Non-sulfur AA in samples was hydrolyzed using pretreatment with 6 M HCl for 24 h, and the hydrolysate was adjusted to pH 2.20, centrifuged, and filtered. Methionine and cysteine were transformed into methionine sulfone and cysteic acid with cold performic acid oxidation overnight and hydrolyzing with 7.5 N HCl at 110 °C for 24 h, and then analyzed using the AA analyzer (Hitachi L-8800). The TiO2 concentration in diets and ileal digesta were analyzed in conformity with the previous report [2]. The AID for nitrogen and AA was calculated using the following formula.
AID of nitrogen = 1 N i × T d / N d × T i × 100
where Ni = nitrogen concentration in ileal digesta (%), Nd = nitrogen concentration in diet (%), Td = titanium dioxide concentration in diet (%), and Ti = titanium dioxide concentration in ileal digesta (%).
AID   of   AA = 1 A i × T d / A d × T i × 100
where Ai = AA concentration in ileal digesta (%), Ad = AA concentration in diet (%), Td = titanium dioxide concentration in diet (%), and Ti = titanium dioxide concentration in ileal digesta (%).

2.6. Statistical Analysis

The main effects of CP levels, protease concentrations, and their interaction were analyzed by a 3 × 3 factorial using the GLM procedure of SAS (v 9.1, SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC, USA). The data within one main factor were subjected to one-way ANOVA to determine the differences between three levels, taking the replicate as the experimental unit (n = 6). All data were tested for normality using the univariate procedure. p ≤ 0.05 was the criterion for significance.

3. Results

3.1. Growth and Slaughter Performance

The effects of dietary CP levels and protease concentrations on ADG, ADFI, F/G, and DCR of broilers are shown in Table 3. In the starter phase, reducing dietary CP levels increased ADFI but had a negative effect on the F/G (p ≤ 0.05). Dietary protease supplementation increased ADG, ADFI, and decreased F/G of broilers (p ≤ 0.05). In the finisher and whole phase, lowering dietary CP contents decreased the ADG and increased F/G, while adding protease to diets increased the ADG and decreased F/G of broilers (p ≤ 0.05). The EPI of broilers was decreased by the reduction in dietary CP levels but increased by the dietary supplementation with protease (p ≤ 0.05). There were no interactions between dietary CP and protease on ADG, ADFI, F/G, and DCR of broilers except for EPI (p ≤ 0.05). In Table 4, dietary CP levels and protease concentrations had no effects or interactions on the carcass traits of broilers, including dressing and the rates of half-eviscerated, full-eviscerated, breast muscle, and leg muscle. The abdominal fat of broilers was increased by the low-protein diets (p ≤ 0.05), but not influenced by the supplementation of protease.

3.2. Blood Biochemistry and Immune Capacity

The effects of dietary CP levels and protease supplementation on serum biochemicals are shown in Table 5, including ALT, AST, ALP, CREA, BA, and UA. The ALP activity and concentrations of CREA and UA were reduced by the dietary CP content (p ≤ 0.05). Dietary protease supplementation increased the concentration of BA and decreased that of UA (p ≤ 0.05). No interactions were observed between dietary CP and protease on all of those biochemical indexes.
As shown in Table 6, dietary CP level and protease concentration had no effect and no interactions on the weight indexes of the thymus, spleen, and bursa and the serum concentrations of IgM and IgG. The IgA concentration in serum was decreased by reducing the dietary CP level (p ≤ 0.05) but was not affected by protease supplementation in diets.

3.3. Apparent Ileal AA Digestibility

The effects of dietary CP level and protease supplementation on apparent ileal CP and AA digestibility coefficients are presented in Table 7. The apparent ileal digestibility coefficients of CP, arginine, cysteine, histidine, isoleucine, leucine, lysine, methionine, phenylalanine, threonine, valine, alanine, aspartic acid, glutamic acid, glycine, proline, and serine increased, along with the reduction in dietary CP content (p ≤ 0.05). Compared with the treatments without protease supplementation, dietary supplementation with 250 mg/kg of protease increased the apparent ileal digestibility coefficients of CP, cysteine, histidine, isoleucine, leucine, phenylalanine, tyrosine, valine, glutamic acid, glycine, proline, and serine, while adding 500 mg/kg of protease only increased those of cysteine, aspartic acid, and glycine (p ≤ 0.05). No significant interactions between dietary CP and protease levels were observed in apparent ileal CP and AA digestibility coefficients other than Cys.

4. Discussion

A large reduction in dietary protein content over 2 percentage points would lead to the poor growth performance of broilers [16,17,18]. Similar results were noted in the present study, where the weight gain and feed efficiency of broilers were depressed along with the reduction in dietary protein levels throughout the whole experimental period. However, feed intake was increased with a dietary protein reduction in the starter phase. One possible explanation is that birds tend to increase their feed intake to compensate for diets that are marginally deficient in CP.
It was widely demonstrated that the growth performance of broilers could be improved by the addition of exogenous proteases to their diets, owing to an increase in the digestibility of CP [13,19,20]. In the current study, the growth performance of birds fed diets supplemented with protease was significantly increased, including ADG and feed efficiency. The digestive system of broilers is immature, and pancreatic protease secretion is limited in the starter phase [21]. Exogenous proteases are beneficial because they help compensate for the deficiency of trypsin and increase the degradation of intestinal proteins [22]. Another possible factor is the indigestible ingredients of cottonseed meal, rapeseed meal, corn gluten meal, and dried distiller’s grains [23], whose digestibility was improved by the addition of exogenous enzymes in diets. It is supported by previous reports that dietary protease supplementation increases nitrogen utilization [14,24]. In addition, there are inconsistent reports that proteases added to a low-protein diet had a small positive effect on growth performance and even a negative effect in the finisher phase on the ADG, ADFI, and F/G of broilers [25]. In the present study, we found that broilers fed diets containing 500 mg/kg protease had a lower apparent ileal digestibility of CP and AA than those containing 250 mg/kg. The underlying reason is that it is possible that the addition of exogenous proteases may inhibit endogenous secretion and activity [26]. These results indicated that a high protease concentration in the diet was not conducive to the growth performance of broilers. Broilers fed the low protein diet had a higher abdominal fat rate [12,27], which was confirmed again in this study. One possibility was that the net energy of the diet was underestimated due to the protein level reduction in the diet [28], which led to increased abdominal fat deposition of broilers. Protease in diets did not affect the rate of fat deposition, which was consistent with the previous results [12].
ALP activity is an important serum biochemical indicator of liver disease, and elevated serum ALP activity probably reflects physiologic or pathologic changes in the liver [29]. The severity of acute kidney injury is classified according to the serum CREA level, which is widely interpreted as a measure of renal function [30]. In the current study, the reduction in dietary CP contents decreased ALP activity and CREA concentration. It suggested that low CP diets are beneficial to the function of the liver and kidney of broilers. There was a tendency for the CREA level to decrease with decreasing protein levels, although this decrease was not significant. CREA is converted from creatine and phosphocreatine, and its absolute conversion rate is usually proportional to body weight [31]. This statement coincides with the ADG of the broilers in this study. Creatine synthesis is a major component of arginine and glycine metabolism [32]. Therefore, the levels of arginine and glycine in the diet have an important effect on the synthesis of CREA. In this study, the digestibility of apparent ileal arginine and glycine increased with the decrease in dietary protein content, which indicates that arginine and glycine are insufficient in the diet. The degradation of AA, deamination of purines and pyrimidines, and absorption from the digestive tract are the main sources of BA. Concentrations of ammonia, together with UA and urea, in serum, were used as indicators of the AA utilization rate of diets for broilers [33]. The serum BA level of broilers fed low-CP diets was significantly greater than those fed normal diets [6]. It could be explained by the fact that low-protein diets reduce nitrogen metabolism pressure in animals. Protease increased the total tract retention of nitrogen and decreased the excreta ammonia of growing broilers [34]. In this study, serum BA was improved by the supplementation of protease but not affected by dietary CP contents. One possibility is that the addition of protease accelerates protein hydrolysis and leads to a high absorption rate in contrast to the absorption of intact protein. Serum UA produced by purine metabolism is a by product of protein catabolism and turnover in the body, balanced by production and the net reabsorption or secretion of the kidney and intestine [35]. A decrease in serum UA could be associated with lower dietary nutrition or less protein degradation [5,15]. In the current study, with the reduction in CP or protease contents in diets, serum UA content decreased, which is similar to the results reported previously [12]. The immune function was observed to be suppressed in cats and pigeons given a low-protein diet [36,37], which was also confirmed in broilers in the present study. It shows that low protein consumption is not conducive to immunity of animals. Enzyme-treated soy protein supplementation in a low-protein diet enhanced the immune function of immune organs in on-growing grass carp [38], whereas the immune response of broilers in the current study did not reveal any significant effect of protease enzyme supplementation, which is consistent with the previous report [39]. It could be deduced that the modulation of immune function by proteases may be related to crude protein levels in feed.
Broilers fed on a low-CP diet significantly increased the apparent ileal digestibility of CP and all AA except for Lys [40]. Significant increases in ileal digestibility were confined to Arg, Ile, Leu, Thr, Val, Cys, and Pro when the dietary protein level was reduced by 4.5 percentage units [3]. The secretion of digestive enzymes in the digestive tract will be lowered in response to the low protein intake [41]. In this study, as dietary protein levels decreased by one percentage unit, the apparent ileal AA digestibility improved except for Tyr. This may be because the ileal endogenous losses of AA of broilers fed low-protein diets were reduced. The addition of exogenous proteases to feed could increase the ileal digestibility of nutrients such as CP, energy, and AA in broilers, thereby effectively improving the growth performance of broilers [10,42,43,44,45]. Consistent with previous findings, in the current study, adding 250 mg/kg protease to diets increased the apparent ileal digestibility coefficients of broilers for cysteine, histidine, isoleucine, leucine, phenylalanine, tyrosine, valine, aspartic acid, glutamic acid, glycine, proline, and serine. Nevertheless, when the added amount was as high as 500 mg/kg in diets, the positive effects of protease on AA digestibility were greatly reduced, which may be owed to the fact that a higher amount of protease in diets significantly decreases trypsin activity and mRNA expression in broilers [46]. In contrast, some reports indicated that the addition of protease had no effect on growth performance or nutrient utilization [14], most likely due to the high digestibility of protein feedstuffs in the basal diet [47]. Therefore, it indicated that appropriate dietary protease increases digestion of CP and consequently promotes the growth performance of broilers. The underlying reason is probably that the addition of proteases plays a role in the pre-digestion of crude protein in feed.

5. Conclusions

Reducing dietary CP contents decreases the growth performance and immune capacity of broilers but significantly increases abdominal fat deposition and apparent ileal digestibility of protein and AA. Protease supplementation in diets increased the growth performance of broilers, probably through the enhancement of AA digestibility, but had no effect on carcass traits or body health. Both reduction in dietary CP levels and protease supplementation were beneficial for reducing fecal nitrogen emission. There were almost no interactions between dietary CP content and protease addition on broiler production, except for EPI.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.C., G.L. and Z.C.; methodology, K.Q., J.C. and G.Z.; data curation, K.Q., J.C. and G.Z.; writing—original draft, K.Q. and J.C.; writing—review and editing, W.C., A.Z. and Z.C.; supervision, K.Q. and J.C.; project administration, H.C., G.L. and Z.C.; funding acquisition, H.C. and G.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research was supported by Modern Agroindustry Technology Research System (CARS-41) and Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program (ASTIP) of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The experimental procedures were approved (ID: AEC-CAAS-20210701) by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Feed Research Institute of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data in the current study are available from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Beski, S.S.M.; Swick, R.A.; Iji, P.A. Specialized protein products in broiler chicken nutrition: A review. Anim. Nutr. 2015, 1, 47–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kidd, M.T.; Gerard, P.D.; Heger, J.; Kerr, B.J.; Rowe, D.; Sistani, K.; Burnham, D.J. Threonine and crude protein responses in broiler chicks. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2001, 94, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chrystal, P.V.; Moss, A.F.; Khoddami, A.; Naranjo, V.D.; Selle, P.H.; Liu, S.Y. Impacts of reduced-crude protein diets on key parameters in male broiler chickens offered maize-based diets. Poult. Sci. 2020, 99, 505–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Awad, E.A.; Zulkifli, I.; Soleimani, A.F.; Aljuobori, A. Effects of feeding male and female broiler chickens on low-protein diets fortified with different dietary glycine levels under the hot and humid tropical climate. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2017, 16, 453–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Hofmann, P.; Siegert, W.; Naranjo, V.D.; Rodehutscord, M. Effects of supplemented nonessential amino acids and nonprotein nitrogen on growth and nitrogen excretion characteristics of broiler chickens fed diets with very low crude protein concentrations. Poult. Sci. 2020, 99, 6848–6858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Namroud, N.F.; Shivazad, M.; Zaghari, M. Effects of fortifying low crude protein diet with crystalline amino acids on performance, blood ammonia level, and excreta characteristics of broiler chicks. Poult. Sci. 2008, 87, 2250–2258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Fang, L.L.; Idrus, Z.; Farjam, A.S.; Liang, J.B.; Mohamed, E. Effects of reduced-protein diets supplemented with protease in broiler chickens under high stocking density. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2019, 59, 2212–2221. [Google Scholar]
  8. Cowieson, A.J.; Bedford, M.R.; Selle, P.H.; Ravindran, V. Phytate and microbial phytase: Implications for endogenous nitrogen losses and nutrient availability. Worlds Poult. Sci. J. 2009, 65, 401–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mahmood, T.; Mirza, M.A.; Nawaz, H.; Shahid, M. Effect of different exogenous proteases on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and carcass response in broiler chickens fed poultry by-product meal-based diets for 35 d. Livest. Sci. 2017, 200, 71–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. McCafferty, K.W.; Choct, M.; Musigwa, S.; Morgan, N.K.; Cowieson, A.J.; Moss, A.F. Protease supplementation reduced the heat increment of feed and improved energy and nitrogen partitioning in broilers fed maize-based diets with supplemental phytase and xylanase. Anim. Nutr. 2022, 10, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nu, S.; Sihag, Z.S.; Ahlawat, P.K.; Dalal, R. Effect of protease enzyme on the growth performance and carcass traits of broilers fed with DDGS supplemented diet. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2018, 7, 2713–2719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Law, F.L.; Zulkifli, I.; Soleimani, A.F.; Liang, J.B.; Awad, E.A. The effects of low-protein diets and protease supplementation on broiler chickens in a hot and humid tropical environment. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2018, 31, 1291–1300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Ndazigaruye, G.; Kim, D.H.; Kang, C.W.; Kang, K.R.; Joo, Y.J.; Lee, S.R.; Lee, K.W. Effects of Low-Protein Diets and Exogenous Protease on Growth Performance, Carcass Traits, Intestinal Morphology, Cecal Volatile Fatty Acids and Serum Parameters in Broilers. Animals 2019, 9, 226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Wang, Q.D.; Zhang, K.Y.; Zhang, Y.; Bai, S.P.; Ding, X.M.; Wang, J.P.; Peng, H.W.; Tian, G.; Xuan, Y.; Su, Z.W.; et al. Effects of dietary protein levels and protease supplementation on growth performance, carcass traits, meat quality, and standardized ileal digestibility of amino acid in Pekin ducks fed a complex diet. Poult. Sci. 2020, 99, 3557–3566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Titgemeyer, E.C.; Armendariz, C.K.; Bindel, D.J.; Greenwood, R.H.; Löest, C.A. Evaluation of titanium dioxide as a digestibility marker for cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 2001, 79, 1059–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. van Harn, J.; Dijkslag, M.A.; van Krimpen, M.M. Effect of low protein diets supplemented with free amino acids on growth performance, slaughter yield, litter quality, and footpad lesions of male broilers. Poult. Sci. 2019, 98, 4868–4877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, T.; Ling, H.; Zhang, W.; Zhou, Y.; Li, Y.; Hu, Y.; Peng, N.; Zhao, S. Protease or Clostridium butyricum addition to a low-protein diet improves broiler growth performance. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2022, 106, 7917–7931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bregendahl, K.; Sell, J.L.; Zimmerman, D.R. Effect of low-protein diets on growth performance and body composition of broiler chicks. Poult. Sci. 2002, 81, 1156–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Law, L.F.; Zulkifli, I.; Soleimani, A.F.; Hossain, M.A.; Liang, J.B. Nutrient digestibility of broiler chickens fed on a low-protein diet supplemented with mono-component proteases. Eur. Poultry Sci. 2015, 79, 107–115. [Google Scholar]
  20. Mahmood, T.; Mirza, M.A.; Nawaz, H.; Shahid, M.; Athar, M.; Hussain, M. Effect of supplementing exogenous protease in low protein poultry by-product meal based diets on growth performance and nutrient digestibility in broilers. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2017, 228, 23–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yuan, L.; Wang, M.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Z. Effects of protease and non-starch polysaccharide enzyme on performance, digestive function, activity and gene expression of endogenous enzyme of broilers. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0173941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Lourenco, J.M.; Nunn, S.C.; Lee, E.J.; Dove, C.R.; Callaway, T.R.; Azain, M.J. Effect of supplemental protease on growth performance and excreta microbiome of broiler chicks. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Babatunde, O.O.; Park, C.S.; Adeola, O. Nutritional potentials of atypical feed ingredients for broiler chickens and pigs. Animals 2021, 11, 1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Olukosi, O.A.; Beeson, L.A.; Englyst, K.; Romero, L.F. Effects of exogenous proteases without or with carbohydrases on nutrient digestibility and disappearance of non-starch polysaccharides in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2015, 94, 2662–2669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lin Law, F.; Idrus, Z.; Soleimani Farjam, A.; Juan Boo, L.; Awad, E.A. Effects of protease supplementation of low protein and/or energy diets on growth performance and blood parameters in broiler chickens under heat stress condition. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2019, 18, 679–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Walkowiak, J.; Witmanowski, H.; Strzykala, K.; Bychowiec, B.; Songin, T.; Borski, K.; Herzig, K.H. Inhibition of endogenous pancreatic enzyme secretion by oral pancreatic enzyme treatment. Eur. J. Clin. Investig. 2003, 33, 65–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mabudabos, A. Effect of enzyme supplementation to normal and low density broiler diets based on corn-soybean meal. Asian. J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 2012, 7, 139–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Zhang, S.; Johnson, J.S.; Qiao, M.; Trottier, N.L. Reduced protein diet with near ideal amino acid profile improves energy efficiency and mitigate heat production associated with lactation in sows. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2020, 11, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Fernandez, N.J.; Kidney, B.A. Alkaline phosphatase: Beyond the liver. Vet. Clin. Pathol. 2007, 36, 223–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mercado, M.G.; Smith, D.K.; Guard, E.L. Acute Kidney Injury: Diagnosis and Management. Am. Fam. Physician 2019, 100, 687–694. [Google Scholar]
  31. Ingoglia, F.; Chong, J.L.; Pasquali, M.; Longo, N. Creatine metabolism in patients with urea cycle disorders. Mol. Genet. Metab. Rep. 2021, 29, 100791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Brosnan, J.T.; Wijekoon, E.P.; Warford-Woolgar, L.; Trottier, N.L.; Brosnan, M.E.; Brunton, J.A.; Bertolo, R.F. Creatine synthesis is a major metabolic process in neonatal piglets and has important implications for amino acid metabolism and methyl balance. J. Nutr. 2009, 139, 1292–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Donsbough, A.L.; Powell, S.; Waguespack, A.; Bidner, T.D.; Southern, L.L. Uric acid, urea, and ammonia concentrations in serum and uric acid concentration in excreta as indicators of amino acid utilization in diets for broilers. Poult. Sci. 2010, 89, 287–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Park, J.H.; Kim, I.H. Effects of a protease and essential oils on growth performance, blood cell profiles, nutrient retention, ileal microbiota, excreta gas emission, and breast meat quality in broiler chicks. Poult. Sci. 2018, 97, 2854–2860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Mandal, A.K.; Mount, D.B. The molecular physiology of uric acid homeostasis. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2015, 77, 323–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Paßlack, N.; Kohn, B.; Doherr, M.G.; Zentek, J. Impact of Dietary Protein Concentration and Quality on Immune Function of Cats. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0169822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Mabuchi, Y.; Frankel, T.L. Functions of innate and acquired immune system are reduced in domestic pigeons (Columba livia domestica) given a low protein diet. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2016, 3, 150408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Song, Y.; Yan, L.C.; Xiao, W.W.; Feng, L.; Jiang, W.D.; Wu, P.; Liu, Y.; Kuang, S.Y.; Tang, L.; Zhou, X.Q. Enzyme-treated soy protein supplementation in low protein diet enhanced immune function of immune organs in on-growing grass carp. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2020, 106, 318–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wani, M.A.; Tyagi, P.K.; Begum, J.; Mir, N.A.; Dev, K.; Biswas, A.; Sharma, D.; Goel, A. Expression of nutrient transporter genes in response to dietary rice gluten meal and protease enzyme supplementation and the consequent effects on growth, nutrient digestibility, immunity and jejunum histomorphometry in chicken. Anim. Biotechnol. 2022, 33, 1620–1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mohamed, E.A.; Idrus, Z.; Farjam, A.S.; Loh, T.C.; Hossain, M.A.; Juobori, A.A. Effect of low-protein diet, gender and age on the apparent ileal amino acid digestibility in broiler chickens raised under hot-humid tropical condition. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 2016, 86, 696–701. [Google Scholar]
  41. Adeola, O.; Xue, P.C.; Cowieson, A.J.; Ajuwon, K.M. Basal endogenous losses of amino acids in protein nutrition research for swine and poultry. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2016, 221, 274–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Cowieson, A.J.; Zaefarian, F.; Knap, I.; Ravindran, V. Interactive effects of dietary protein concentration, a mono-component exogenous protease and ascorbic acid on broiler performance, nutritional status and gut health. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2016, 57, 1058–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Mahmood, T.; Mirza, M.A.; Nawaz, H.; Shahid, M. Exogenous protease supplementation of poultry by-product meal-based diets for broilers: Effects on growth, carcass characteristics and nutrient digestibility. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2018, 102, e233–e241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Adebiyi, A.O.; Olukosi, O.A. Apparent and standardised ileal amino acid digestibility of wheat distillers dried grains with solubles with or without exogenous protease in broilers and turkeys. Br. Poult. Sci. 2015, 56, 239–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Hu, J.; Ingale, S.; Rathi, P.; Zhang, J.Y. Influence of exogenous acid protease in broiler chickens fed corn-soybean meal-based diets. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2020, 104, 204–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Yuan, L.; Wang, S.Q.; Wang, Z.X.; Zhu, H.; Huang, K. Effects of exogenous protease supplementation on endogenous trypsin activity and gene expression in broilers. Genet. Mol. Res. 2015, 14, 13633–13641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Tari, L.M.; Perera, W.N.U.; Zaefarian, F.; Abdollahi, M.R.; Cowieson, A.J.; Ravindran, V. Influence of barley inclusion method and protease supplementation on growth performance, nutrient utilisation, and gastrointestinal tract development in broiler starters. Anim. Nutr. 2022, 8, 61–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Experimental design and dietary treatments.
Table 1. Experimental design and dietary treatments.
TreatmentsProtein Levels % 1Protease, mg/kg
Starter PhaseFinisher Phase
T120180
T22018250
T32018500
T419.517.50
T519.517.5250
T619.517.5500
T719170
T81917250
T91917500
1 Starter phase: 1–21 days old; finisher phase: 22–42 days old.
Table 2. Ingredient composition and nutrient content of basal diets (dry matter basis).
Table 2. Ingredient composition and nutrient content of basal diets (dry matter basis).
ItemsStarter Phase (Day 1~21)Finisher Phase (Day 22~42)
CP20%CP19.5%CP19%CP18%CP17.5%CP17%
Ingredient, %
Corn60.0061.2562.5062.9864.1565.33
Soybean meal24.4923.6822.8715.2314.5613.90
Cottonseed meal3.003.003.005.005.005.00
DDGS3.003.003.005.005.005.00
Corn gluten meal1.861.511.162.782.331.89
Soybean oil2.612.532.464.354.304.26
NaCl0.350.350.350.350.350.35
CaHPO41.711.711.711.351.351.36
Limestone1.501.501.511.491.491.50
L-Lys, 79%0.630.620.600.690.670.65
DL-Met, 99%0.180.180.170.170.160.16
L-Thr, 98.5%0.170.160.160.170.170.17
Choline chloride, 50%0.200.200.200.200.200.20
Premix 10.300.300.300.300.300.30
Total100100100100100100
Nutrient levels 2, %
Metabolizable energy, MJ/kg300030003000315031503150
Crude protein20.0019.5019.0018.0017.5017.00
Lys 1.361.331.291.221.191.15
Met0.510.490.480.460.450.44
Met + Cys0.830.810.800.760.740.72
Thr0.910.890.870.810.780.76
Trp0.250.240.240.200.190.19
Arg1.231.201.171.061.031.00
Leu1.681.631.571.591.521.46
Ile0.710.690.670.610.590.57
Phe0.990.960.940.900.870.84
Phe + Tyr1.691.641.591.531.481.43
His0.470.460.450.410.400.39
Val0.860.830.810.760.740.72
Calcium1.001.001.000.900.900.90
Available Phosphorus0.450.450.450.420.420.42
1 In one kilogram of diets, for broilers with 1 to 21 days of age, vitamin A 8000 IU, vitamin D3 1000 IU, vitamin E 20 mg, vitamin K3 0.5 mg, vitamin B1 2.0 mg, vitamin B2 8 mg, vitamin B6 3.5 mg, vitamin B12 0.01 mg, pantothenic acid 10 mg, nicotinic acid 35 mg, folic acid 0.55 mg, biotin 0.18 mg, copper sulfate 8 mg, ferrous sulfate 80 mg, zinc sulfate 80 mg, manganese sulfate 80 mg, potassium iodide 0.7 mg; for broilers with 22 to 42 days of age, vitamin A 6 000 IU, vitamin D3 750 IU, vitamin E 10 mg, vitamin K3 0.5 mg, vitamin B1 2.0 mg, vitamin B2 5 mg, vitamin B6 3.0 mg, vitamin B12 0.01 mg, pantothenic acid 10 mg, nicotinic acid 30 mg, folic acid 0.55 mg, biotin 0.15 mg, copper sulfate 6.4 mg, ferrous sulfate 64 mg, zinc sulfate 64 mg, manganese sulfate 64 mg, potassium iodide 0.56 mg. 2 Nutrient levels were calculated values. DDGS: distillers dried grains with soluble.
Table 3. Effects of dietary crude protein and protease levels on growth performance of broilers.
Table 3. Effects of dietary crude protein and protease levels on growth performance of broilers.
Crude Protein LevelProtease, mg/kgSEMp-Value
CP1CP2CP30250500CPPTCP × PT
Day 1~21
ADG, g44.9543.6044.1542.59 y43.97 xy46.14 x2.270.06<0.010.09
ADFI, g55.02 b54.27 b56.24 a53.98 y54.96 xy56.59 x1.150.05<0.010.64
FCR, g/g1.22 b1.24 ab1.27 a1.27 x1.25 xy1.23 y0.010.010.040.31
DCR, %0.830.830.000.830.830.000.020.340.450.59
Day 22~42
ADG, g85.57 a80.49 b80.07 b80.14 y81.46 xy84.53 x1.870.050.020.70
ADFI, g150.89146.36143.55146.34144.66149.802.710.230.450.98
FCR, g/g1.76 b1.82 a1.79 ab1.83 x1.78 y1.77 y0.020.050.010.18
DCR, %1.660.830.831.660.830.830.030.170.230.19
Day 1~42
ADG, g65.36 a62.13 b62.31 b61.37 y62.80 xy65.63 x1.420.020.570.44
ADFI, g103.81101.04101.59101.38101.21103.851.390.370.700.96
FCR, g/g1.59 b1.63 a1.63 a1.65 x1.61 y1.58 y0.010.010.270.06
DCR, %2.491.660.832.491.660.830.020.130.240.08
EPI408.14 a382.47 b385.81 b368.86 z390.03 y418.33 x10.33<0.01<0.010.05
CP1, CP2, and CP3 represent the groups fed diets containing 20%, 19.5%, and 19% crude protein, respectively, within 1 to 21 days, and 18%, 17.5%, and 17% crude protein, respectively, over 22 to 42 days. CP: crude protein level, PT: protease, ADG: average daily gain, ADFI: average daily feed intake, FCR: feed conversion ratio, DCR: death and culling rate, EPI: European performance index, SEM: standard error of means, a, b, x–z: means without a common superscripted letter within a line are significantly different.
Table 4. Effects of dietary crude protein and protease levels on carcass traits of broilers.
Table 4. Effects of dietary crude protein and protease levels on carcass traits of broilers.
Item, %Crude Protein LevelProtease, mg/kgSEMp-Value
CP1CP2CP30250500 CPPTCP × PT
Dressing92.8591.5590.9591.3891.7492.221.730.550.970.58
Half eviscerated86.4085.8884.4484.8485.8985.981.810.840.070.87
Full eviscerated73.9973.7273.1473.3273.1274.411.830.060.860.41
Breast muscle29.3329.5428.4229.5329.2128.550.270.450.440.41
Leg muscle22.0221.9721.9221.8422.4921.510.220.990.460.48
Abdominal fat2.30 b2.49 ab2.64 a2.482.542.410.110.040.350.11
CP1, CP2, and CP3 represent the groups fed diets containing 20%, 19.5%, and 19% crude protein, respectively, within 1 to 21 days, and 18%, 17.5%, and 17% crude protein, respectively, over 22 to 42 days. CP: crude protein level, PT: protease, SEM: standard error of means. a,b: means without a common superscripted letter within a line are significantly different.
Table 5. Effects of dietary crude protein and protease levels on serum biochemical parameters of broilers.
Table 5. Effects of dietary crude protein and protease levels on serum biochemical parameters of broilers.
Item, %Crude Protein LevelProtease, mg/kgSEMp-Value
CP1CP2CP30250500 CPPTCP × PT
ALT, U/L1.771.791.761.851.691.780.090.980.530.96
AST, U/L172.35181.62161.09185.48147.29182.3017.560.690.210.09
ALP, U/L6810.6 a1830.2 b2461.7 b4573.12615.73913.61208.00.030.750.75
CREA, μmol/L12.56 a10.50 b9.87 b9.8611.3711.710.850.040.280.41
BA, μmol/L43.1944.6445.1239.65 z45.21 y48.11 x1.830.820.050.45
UA, μmol/L295.54 a259.17 ab222.69 b325.77 x245.39 y206.23 z16.670.04<0.010.81
CP1, CP2, and CP3 represent the groups fed diets containing 20%, 19.5%, and 19% crude protein, respectively, within 1 to 21 days, and 18%, 17.5%, and 17% crude protein, respectively, over 22 to 42 days. CP: crude protein level, PT: protease, ALT: alanine aminotransferase, AST: aspartate aminotransferase, ALP: alkaline phosphatase, CREA: creatinine, BA: blood ammonia, UA: uric acid, SEM: standard error of means, a, b, x–z: means without a common superscripted letter within a line are significantly different.
Table 6. Effects of dietary crude protein and protease levels on immune organ indices and serum immunoglobulins of broilers.
Table 6. Effects of dietary crude protein and protease levels on immune organ indices and serum immunoglobulins of broilers.
Item, %Crude Protein LevelProtease, mg/kgSEM p-Value
CP1CP2CP30250500 CPPTCP × PT
Thymus0.270.240.270.290.270.230.030.660.350.11
Spleen0.110.090.110.100.100.110.010.120.720.42
Bursa of Fabricius0.060.060.070.060.070.060.010.670.850.69
IgA, g/L2.46 a2.21 b2.06 c2.282.332.120.100.030.330.47
IgM, g/L1.591.511.721.631.521.660.080.190.440.11
IgG, g/L4.584.544.444.564.524.480.180.320.190.18
CP1, CP2, and CP3 represent the groups fed diets containing 20%, 19.5%, and 19% crude protein, respectively, within 1 to 21 days, and 18%, 17.5%, and 17% crude protein, respectively, over 22 to 42 days. CP: crude protein level, PT: protease, IgA: immunoglobulin A, IgG: immunoglobulin G, IgM: immunoglobulin M, SEM: standard error of means, a–c: means without a common superscripted letter within a line are significantly different.
Table 7. Effects of dietary crude protein and protease levels on crude protein and apparent ileal essential AA digestibility coefficients of broilers.
Table 7. Effects of dietary crude protein and protease levels on crude protein and apparent ileal essential AA digestibility coefficients of broilers.
Item, %Crude Protein LevelProtease, mg/kgSEMp-Value
CP1CP2CP30250500 CPPTCP × PT
Crude protein68.94 b73.57 a75.43 a71.04 y74.86 x72.04 xy1.330.040.050.45
Indispensable AA
Arg78.98 b81.36 ab83.59 a80.3383.4780.131.790.020.080.76
Cys58.41 b68.35 a65.00 a61.00 y65.04 x65.72 x1.95<0.010.040.02
His68.79 b74.57 a75.98 a71.49 y74.65 x73.20 xy2.04<0.010.050.39
Ile68.74 c72.03 b74.52 a70.28 y74.68 x70.34 y1.480.04<0.010.62
Leu73.06 b77.01 a78.29 a74.84 y78.95 x74.57 y1.360.03<0.010.82
Lys77.23 c79.88 b83.54 a79.8681.3179.491.910.030.630.83
Met81.26 b84.51 a84.92 a83.6985.0781.941.320.030.330.87
Phe75.22 b76.94 ab78.70 a74.83 y80.65 x75.38 y1.520.05<0.010.74
Thr62.68 c69.83 b72.79 a67.0769.7068.530.94<0.010.070.15
Tyr73.9073.4174.3872.72 y77.19 x71.79 y2.360.960.040.75
Val63.64 b70.74 a73.25 a66.99 y71.65 x68.99 xy1.77<0.010.030.36
Dispensable AA
Ala69.90 b75.81 a77.35 a73.2276.3773.471.890.010.090.74
Asp63.60 b70.98 a73.53 a66.96 y70.77 x70.38 x1.51<0.01<0.010.11
Glu74.81 b79.88 a81.01 a77.04 y80.58 x78.08 xy1.480.020.050.59
Gly59.25 c66.81 b69.48 a62.68 y66.86 x66.00 x2.01<0.01<0.010.09
Pro68.58 b75.16 a75.95 a71.77 y75.53 x72.40 xy1.720.010.030.71
Ser64.60 c71.31 b73.06 a67.42 y71.74 x69.82 xy1.12<0.010.020.32
CP1, CP2, and CP3 represent the groups fed diets containing 20%, 19.5%, and 19% crude protein, respectively, within 1 to 21 days, and 18%, 17.5%, and 17% crude protein, respectively, over 22 to 42 days. CP: crude protein level, PT: protease, AA; Lys, lysine; Met, methionine; Thr, threonine; Val, valine; Ile, isoleucine; Leu, leucine; Phe, phenylalanine; Arg, arginine; His, histidine; Gly, glycine; Asp, aspartic acid; Ser, serine; Pro, proline; Ala, alanine; Cys, cysteine; Glu, glutamic acid; Tyr, tyrosine; SEM: standard error of means, a–c, x–y: means without a common superscripted letter within a line are significantly different.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Qiu, K.; Chen, J.; Zhang, G.; Chang, W.; Zheng, A.; Cai, H.; Liu, G.; Chen, Z. Effects of Dietary Crude Protein and Protease Levels on Performance, Immunity Capacity, and AA Digestibility of Broilers. Agriculture 2023, 13, 703. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13030703

AMA Style

Qiu K, Chen J, Zhang G, Chang W, Zheng A, Cai H, Liu G, Chen Z. Effects of Dietary Crude Protein and Protease Levels on Performance, Immunity Capacity, and AA Digestibility of Broilers. Agriculture. 2023; 13(3):703. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13030703

Chicago/Turabian Style

Qiu, Kai, Jiang Chen, Guangmin Zhang, Wenhuan Chang, Aijuan Zheng, Huiyi Cai, Guohua Liu, and Zhimin Chen. 2023. "Effects of Dietary Crude Protein and Protease Levels on Performance, Immunity Capacity, and AA Digestibility of Broilers" Agriculture 13, no. 3: 703. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13030703

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop